BioMed Research International
Volume 2018 (2018), Article ID 6285134, 14 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6285134

Review Article

Isolation, Structures, and Bioactivities of the Polysaccharides from Gynostemma pentaphyllum (Thunb.) Makino: A Review

Xiaolong Ji,¹ Yingbin Shen,² and Xudan Guo³

¹College of Food Science and Engineering, Northwest A&F University, 712100 Yangling, China
²Department of Food Science and Engineering, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, Guangdong, China
³Basic Medical College, Hebei University of Chinese Medicine, 050200 Shijiazhuang, China

Correspondence should be addressed to Xudan Guo; guoxudan123@126.com

Received 22 July 2018; Accepted 30 September 2018; Published 16 October 2018

Academic Editor: Gail B. Mahady

Copyright © 2018 Xiaolong Ji et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

Polysaccharides obtained from Gynostemma pentaphyllum (Thunb.) Makino have promising prospects in functional food and nutraceuticals due to its broad range of biological activities including antioxidant, immunomodulatory, antitumor, hepatoprotective, neuroprotective, and antifatigue activities. These beneficial biological activities are related to chemical composition and structure of the G. pentaphyllum polysaccharides. The molecular weight, monosaccharide composition, and chemical structures could be influenced by both different extraction/purification techniques employed to obtain polysaccharide enriched products. The purpose of this article is to review previous and current literature regarding the extraction, purification, structural characterization, and biological activity of G. pentaphyllum polysaccharides. This review provides a useful bibliography for the further investigation, production, and application of G. pentaphyllum polysaccharides as functional foods and nutraceuticals.

1. Introduction

Gynostemma pentaphyllum (Thunb.) Makino, named “Jiao-Gu-Lan” in Chinese, belongs to the family Cucurbitaceae and genus Gynostemma Bl. and is distributed widely in northeast and southeast Asia [1–3]. G. pentaphyllum has been used in food and supplemental products for hundreds of years in China, where it is mainly distributed south of the Qinling Mountains and Yangtze River [4, 5]. According to the traditional Chinese medicine, the taste and nature of G. pentaphyllum are slightly bitter, neutral, and warm [6]. G. pentaphyllum consumption is believed to treat hematuria, edema, pain of the pharynx, heat and edema of the neck, and tumors and trauma [7]. The book, Herbs for Famine, published during the Ming Dynasty (1368-1644 AD) described the use of G. pentaphyllum as a vegetable, which was suitable as a food or a dietary supplement during famine [6, 8]. At present, lots of G. pentaphyllum products have been launched in the United States, China, and several other Asian and European countries, including G. pentaphyllum tea, tablet, instant powder, capsule, oral liquid, and pill. In addition, there are additives made from G. pentaphyllum for use in beverage, sports drink, cola, beer, biscuits, breads, and noodles [9, 10].

In recent decades, pharmacological studies have reported many functions of G. pentaphyllum, including antimicrobial, anticancer, antiaging, antifatigue, antiulcer, hypolipidemic, and immune-modulatory activities [11–15]. The multiple pharmacological effects of G. pentaphyllum are attributed to its various chemical ingredients, including saponins, amino acids, polysaccharides, flavonoids, organic acids, trace elements, and other chemicals [16, 17]. Polysaccharides are one of the most abundant components of G. pentaphyllum and represent a major group of biologically active constituents. G. pentaphyllum polysaccharides isolated with different extraction and purification methods have been shown to be structurally diverse biomacromolecules with various functions, including anti-inflammatory [18], antitumor [19], immunomodulatory [20, 21], and antioxidant activities [22], antiexercise fatigue properties [23, 24], hepatoprotective [25], and neuroprotective [26] activities and as a therapeutic agent for the treatment hyperlipidemia disorders [27].

To the best of our knowledge, there has been no review of the extraction and purification techniques or the structural characteristics and biological activities of G. pentaphyllum polysaccharides. One of the purposes of this review is therefore to report the relationships between the structural features and biological activities of G. pentaphyllum polysaccharides in order, to aid in the better understanding and subsequent utilization of these macromolecules.

2. Extraction and Purification Methods

As G. pentaphyllum polysaccharides are structural components of cell walls, basic extraction methods are used that breakdown the cell wall from the outer layer to the inner layer with mild to strong extraction conditions, which do not alter the structural morphology of the cell well [28–32]. The list of the extraction methods for G. pentaphyllum polysaccharides obtained from pretreated dry powders is summarized in Table 1. Generally, extraction in hot or boiling water is the classical and most convenient method of laboratory extraction and is also widely used in industry [30, 31]. The liquid: solid ratio has an important influence on the yield for conventional water extraction, and the extraction temperature together with time is usually in the range of 80-100°C and 15-360 min, respectively. However, the disadvantages of hot water extraction include long times and high temperatures, low efficiency, and possible polysaccharides degradation [33]. Different technologies have been used to improve the efficiency of extraction, including microwave-assisted treatments, high-powered ultrasonic processing, and enzyme assistant extraction. Response surface methodology based on a Box-Behnken design or Central Composite Rotatable design was applied to optimize extraction conditions to obtain the crude G. pentaphyllum polysaccharides through water extraction and ethanol precipitation [34–37]. Taken together, with the application of various technologies, a higher yield could be obtained, even with fewer and shorter extraction times, with lower extraction temperatures, and with smaller solid: liquid ratios [28]. Figure 1 illustrates the extraction and purification of G. pentaphyllum polysaccharides. An ultrasonic and microwave-assisted extraction method is used to maximize the output of G. pentaphyllum polysaccharides. The most favorable conditions for this extraction originated in the Qinling Mountains of Shaanxi Province and include ultrasonic power of 900 W, an extraction time of 40 min, and a liquid: solid ratio of 1:25, to produce a final yield of 7.29% [38]. Zhou identified the optimal extraction conditions as a microwave power of 800 W, microwave time of 15 min, and a liquid: solid ratio of 1:35. Under these conditions, the yield of crude polysaccharides from G. pentaphyllum was 8.61% [38].

Table 1: A summary of the extraction of polysaccharides from Gynostemma pentaphyllum.

Types
Times (min)
Solid-liquid ratio
Temperature (°C)
Solvent
Other conditions
Yield (%)
References

Routine extraction

GPMPP
90
1:15
95
water
4 times

[36]

CGP
15
1:67
95
water
immersing time: 10 min
11.29
[37]

CGP
30
1:10
100
water

6.82
[49]

CGP
120
1:20
100
water
2 times
6.35
[38]

CGP
120
1:15
80
water

2.82
[34]

CGP
180
1:40
80
water
2 times
5.35
[53]

CGP
120
1:40
85
water
2 times

[54]

CGP
120
1:15
90
water
2 times
4.03
[55]

CGP
60
1:16
80
water

9.66
[56]

GPP
120
1:15
80
water
2 times
11.44
[22]

CGP
120
1:16
80
alkali solution
0.5 M NaOH

[18]

CGP
360
1:16

alkali solution
0.5 M NaOH

[56]

Ultrasound-assisted extraction

CGP
40
1:25

water
ultrasonic power 900W 2 times
7.29
[38]

CGP
31
1:26
83
water

3.356
[57]

CGP
15

50
water
ultrasonic power 800W
2.49
[35]

GPP
52
1:47
100
water
ultrasonic power 129W
3.24
[58]

Microwave-assisted extraction

CGP
15
1:35

water
microwave power 800W 2 times
8.61
[38]

CGP
6
1:25

microwave power 560W immersing time: 70 min
3.91
[55]

GGP
12
1:20

microwave power 400W immersing time: 50 min
3.37
[34]

Enzyme-assisted extraction

CGP
150

45
water
ratio of enzyme amount 2%, pH 6.0

[59]

Figure 1: Schematic representation of the extraction, purification, and bioactivity of polysaccharides from the Gynostemma pentaphyllum.

Crude G. pentaphyllum polysaccharides can be further purified by a combination of techniques, including precipitation with ethanol, protein removal by the Savage reagent, decolorization by H₂O₂ or macroporous resin, ion exchange chromatography, and gel filtration chromatography [39, 40]. Ion exchange chromatography separates neutral polysaccharides from acidic ones using various concentrations of an NaCl eluent. Gel filtration separates polysaccharides of different molecular weights. Li et al. isolated three different fractions (GPA1, GPA2, and GPA3) from acidic G. pentaphyllum polysaccharides separated with a diethylaminoethyl-cellulose column (7.0 × 30 cm) and a Sepharose CL-6B column (2.5 × 100 cm). These three acidic polysaccharides contained different amounts of Man, Rha, GlcA, GalA, Glc, Gal, Xyl, Ara, and Fuc [4]. Jia et al. fractionated GPP1, GPP2, and GPP3 with a DEAE cellulose column (2.0 × 40 cm) preequilibrated with distilled water and eluted with 0, 0.3, and 2.5 M of NaCl at a flow rate of 1 mL/min (10 mL/tube). The collected fraction was further purified on a Sephacryl S-400 column (3.0 × 100 cm) and eluted with distilled water at a flow rate of 0.3 mL/min. The major polysaccharide fraction was collected and freeze-dried to give a white purified polysaccharide [41].

The procedures used to separate and purify the polysaccharides from G. pentaphyllum are summarized as follows. Briefly, G. pentaphyllum is carefully washed, dried, and ground to obtain a fine powder and then immersed in 80% ethanol for hours to remove fat, pigments, and low molecular weight sugars. The polysaccharide solution is then extracted from the residue with water using differentially assisted extraction steps and is then filtered and concentrated [42, 43]. After solubilization, the resultant polysaccharide solution is usually subjected to different chromatographic columns described above and sequentially eluted with appropriate running buffers, collected, dialyzed, concentrated, and lyophilized, to produce the pure G. pentaphyllum polysaccharides [41, 42]. The polysaccharide contents can be determined using the phenol-sulfuric acid method [44]. The polysaccharides isolated from G. pentaphyllum are used to make oral liquid, sports drink and chewable tablet.

3. Physiochemical and Structural Features

The physiochemical and structural characteristics of a polysaccharide mainly include monosaccharide composition and sequence, molecular weight, configurations, types, and positions of glycosidic linkages [45–47]. Polysaccharides with various monosaccharide constituents and chemical structures have been isolated from G. pentaphyllum. Different research groups determined the basic chemical structures of purified G. pentaphyllum polysaccharides using gas chromatography, gas chromatography-mass spectroscopy, infrared spectroscopy, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), acid hydrolysis, methylation analysis, periodate oxidation, and Smith degradation [15, 22]. The primary structural characteristics of G. pentaphyllum polysaccharides, such as their molecular weights, monosaccharide compositions, chemical structures, and biological activities, are summarized in Table 2, together with their names and related bibliographies.

Table 2: The polysaccharides isolated from Gynostemma pentaphyllum.

No.
Compound name
Molecular weight (Da)
Monosaccharide composition
Structures
Biological activities
Reference

1
GPMPP
3.67×10⁴
Rha, Ara, Xyl, Man, Glc, Gal in the ratio of 1.39:3.76:1.00:1.64:4.98:
5.88

Antioxidant
Immunomodulation
[13]

2
GPA1
1.96×10⁴
Man, Rha, GlcA, GalA, Glc, Gal, Ara, Fuc in the ratio of 1:0.04:1.4: 0.9:1.3:2.6:2:0.2

Antioxidant
[4]

GPA2
1.06×10⁴
Man, Rha, GlcA, GalA, Glc, Gal, Xyl, Ara, Fuc in the ratio of 1:0.1: 2.2:1.8:2.2:2.6:0.2:1.9:0.2

GPA3
6.7×10³
Man, Rha, GlcA, GalA, Glc, Gal, Xyl, Ara, Fuc in the ratio of 1:0.6: 3.9:0.5:5.5:2.6:0.5:1.2:0.2

3
GPP1

Glc, Man, Gal, Rha, Ara in the ratio of10.0:9.9:5.1:2.5:2.4
Backbone composed of (1→6)-linked- Glcp, (1→6)-linked-Manp, (1→3,6)- linked-Galp, with braches attached to O-3 of some residues. Braches composed of (1→)-linked-Rhap residues and (1→)-linked-Araf residues
Neuroprotective effect
[41]

4
CGPP

Man, Glc, Ara, Rha, Gal, GlcA in the ratio of 2.0:2.2:1.3:2.2:1.2:2.5

Anticancer
Immunomodulation
[20]

5
GPP-TL
9.3×10³
Glc, Gal, Ara in the ratio of 43:5:1
Backbone composed of (1→4)-α--Glcp, (1→4)-β--Galp, (1→4,6)-α--Glcp, with braches attached to O-6 of some residues. Braches composed of (1→)-α--Glcp
Antioxidant
[9]

6
GPS-3
9.1×10³
Rha, Xyl, Ara, Gal, Glc in the ratio of 1.75:1.00:8.70:3.07:5.79
α-configuration and β-configuration
Hepatoprotective activity
Antitumor
[49, 50]

GPS-2
1.07×10⁴
Rha, Xyl in the ratio of 1:12.25
α-configuration

7
GPP1-a

Ara, Gal, Glc in the ratio of 0.18: 0.72:1.00
β-configuration
Antioxidant
[60]

GPP2-b
Ara, Rib, Xyl, Gal, Glc in the ratio of 0.38:0.64:0.97:1.26:1.00
β-configuration

GPP3-a
Rib, Fru, Gal, Glc in the ratio of 1.62:0.54:0.49:1.00
α-configuration

8
GP-I
9.3×10⁴
Glc, Gal, Man, Rha, Ara in the ratio of 5.3: 4.2: 3.0: 0.7: 0.8

Anticancer
[43]

9
GP-B1
7.9×10⁴
Gal, Ara, Man, Rha, Xyl, Glc, GalA, GlcA in the ratio of 3.5:3.2: 0.6:0.9:0.3:0.5:0.6:0.4

Antitumor
[42]

GP-C1
1.26×10⁵
Gal, Ara, Man, Rha, Glc, GlcA in the ratio of 2.1:1.0:0.3:0.5:0.4:0.9

10
GPP2-s1
1.12×10⁴

C-6 position and C-2 position
Antitumor
[19]

11
GPP1-a
8.92×10⁴
Ara, Gal, Glc in the ratio of 0.18:0.72:1.00
Backbone composed of (1→4)-α-- Glcp, with braches attached to O-6 of some residues. Braches composed of (1→6)-α--Glcp, (1→3)-β--Galp, (1→6)-α--Galp, and terminated with (1→)-β--Galp and (1→)-β--Araf. α-configuration.
Anti-fatigue activity
[22]

GPP2-b
1.975×10⁵
Ara, Rib, Xyl, Gal, Glc in the ratio of 0.38:0.64:0.97:1.26:1.00
α-configuration

GPP3-a
2.536×10⁵
Rib, Fru, Gal, Glc in the ratio of 1.62:0.54:0.49:1.00
α-configuration

12
PSGP

Gal, Ara, Rha, GalA, Xyl, Man, GlcA in the ratio of 18.9: 10.5:7.7: 4.7:3.9:3.1:1.2

Immunomodulation
[61]

13
GPP-S
1.2×10⁶
Rha, Ara, Glc, Gal in the ratio of 1:3.72:19.49:7.82
Backbone composed of (1→4)-linked- Glcp and (1→6)-linked-Galp, Braches composed of (1→4,6)-α--Glcp and terminated with (1→)-linked-Araf residues
Antioxidant
Anti-inflammatory
[18]

14
GM

Glc, Gal, Man, Fru in the ratio of 1.54:3.05:1.00:1.10

Antioxidant
[62]

GMA
9.4×10⁴
Glc, Fru in the ratio of 11.45:1.00

GMB
1.2×10⁵
Glc, Gal, Man in the ratio of 1.30:1.31:1.00

GMC
7.2×10⁴
Glc, Gal, Man, Fru in the ratio of 1.00:2.17:1.25:1.02

15
GPP
7.1×10³
Man, Glc, Gal, Ara, in the ratio of 1.00:77.33:4.81:1.83.
Backbone composed of (1→4)-α-- Glcp, with braches attached to O-6 of some residues. Braches composed of (1→4, 6)-α--Glcp, and terminated with (1→) -α--Glcp residues
Antioxidant
[15]

16
GPM1
2.0×10⁵
Rha, Ara, Xyl, Man, Glc, Gal in the ratio of 1.78:1.99:1.00:1.11:6.00:6.89

Antioxidant
[38]

GPM2
1.67×10⁵
Rha, Ara, Xyl, Man, Glc, Gal in the ratio of 3.23:7.70:1.00:2.29:2.88: 14.82

17
GPI

Glc, GalA, Man, Ara, Rha, Gal, Xyl in the ratio of 6.81:7.19:13.19: 33.86:6.77:8.13:3.46
furan structure
Antioxidant
[59]

18
GPP
2.52×10⁶
Man, GlcA, Gal, Xyl, Rha
α-configuration
Antioxidant
[53]

3.1. Monosaccharide Compositions

Monosaccharide composition analyses commonly involve the cleavage of glycosidic linkages by acid hydrolysis, derivatization, and detection and quantification with HPLC and gas chromatography methods [30, 48]. Because different raw materials, extractions, and purification processes have been used, different monosaccharide compositions of G. pentaphyllum polysaccharides have been reported, but most of the polysaccharides are composed of Rha, Man, Ara, Glc, and Gal in different molar ratios. Li et al. separated three polysaccharides, GPA1, GPA2, and GPA3, from G. pentaphyllum and analyzed their monosaccharide compositions with HPLC [4]. The results are shown in Table 2. Song and colleagues reported the monosaccharide compositions of two polysaccharides (GPS-2 and GPS-3) and found that GPS-3 consisted of Rha, Xyl, Ara, Gal, and Glc in a molar ratio of 1.75:1.00:8.70:3.07:5.79, whereas GPS-2 consisted only of Rha and Xyl [49, 50]. Various G. pentaphyllum polysaccharides have different monosaccharide compositions in various molar ratios. Indeed, the same variety G. pentaphyllum in different fields may have different monosaccharide compositions.

3.2. Average Molecular Weights

Different techniques including HPLC and high-performance gel permeation chromatography have been used to determine the average molecular weights of G. pentaphyllum polysaccharides, with many studies of G. pentaphyllum polysaccharides based on the same methods [42, 43]. Chi et al. reported that the molecular weights of G. pentaphyllum polysaccharides were 8.920 × 10⁴ Da (GPP1-a), 1.975 × 10⁵ Da (GPP2-b), and 2.536×10⁵ Da (GPP3-a) [22]. Different molecular weights in the range of 10³-10⁶ Da have been found in various G. pentaphyllum preparations using different experimental conditions.

3.3. Chemical Structures

Apart from their monosaccharide components and molecular weights, little structural or conformational information regarding G. pentaphyllum polysaccharides has been reported. A structural investigation of a G. pentaphyllum polysaccharide with antiexercise fatigue activity (GPP1-a) indicated that GPP1-a (Figure 2(a)) contained a backbone of (1→4)-linked -D-glucose residues, with branches attached at O-6. The branches were mainly composed of (1→6)-linked -D-glucose, (1→3)-linked -D-galactose, and (1→6)-linked α-D-galactose residues and terminated with --arabinose residues [22].

(a)

(b)

Figure 2: Schematic structure of GPP1-a (a) and GPP-S (b).

The structural features of a water-soluble polysaccharide (GPP-S) were studied using methylation analysis, Fourier transform-infrared spectroscopy, and ¹H, ¹³C, and HSQC, COSY, and HMBC NMR spectral data. It was shown that the GPP-S primarily consisted of (1→4)-linked-Glcp (76.37%), (1→4,6)-linked-Glcp (12.42%), (1→6)-linked-Galp (6.74%), and (1→)-linked-Araf (4.47%); a schematic structure is shown in Figure 2(b) [18].

The primary structures of G. pentaphyllum polysaccharide (GPP-TL) were determined with a combination of chemical and instrumental analyses, including methylation analysis, gas chromatography, infrared spectroscopy, and ¹H and ¹³C NMR. GPP-TL had glucose and galactose residues in the main chain with (1→6)-linked branches at glucose residues [9].

3.4. Conformational Features

Polysaccharide activities depend on their chemical structures, molecular weights, and chain conformations, but no reports are available on the chain conformations of G. pentaphyllum polysaccharides [30, 51]. Except for a study by Chi et al., no reports have described scanning electron microscopic and atomic force microscopic structural characterization of GPP1-a. GPP1-a consisted mainly of randomly distributed individual spherical particles, which were comprised of smaller spherical particles with diameters of 500-1000 nm. There were many clusters with different sizes, which were attributed to the aggregation of one or more GPP 1-a polysaccharide chains at room temperature [22].

The relationships between the chain conformations of G. pentaphyllum polysaccharides and their biological activities are difficult to determine [46, 48]. The details of the chain conformations of G. pentaphyllum polysaccharides in aqueous solution require further investigation with advanced technologies, such as viscosity analyses, static and dynamic light scattering, circular dichroism, transmission and scanning electron microscopy, atomic force microscopy, fluorescence spectroscopy, and NMR spectroscopy [48, 52].

4. Biological Activities

Based on traditional Chinese medicine theory, G. pentaphyllum is widely used to reduce cholesterol levels, promote the production of body fluids, regulate blood pressure, strengthen the immune system, treat chronic bronchitis and gastritis, and reduce inflammation [63–66]. According to many studies, polysaccharides are a major class of bioactive compounds in G. pentaphyllum, contributing to its beneficial effects on human health and its pharmacological activities. The multiple bioactivities and health benefits of G. pentaphyllum polysaccharides are summarized and compared in detail below.

4.1. Antioxidant Activity

Natural materials are a highly promising source of antioxidants, and a wide range of bioactive constituents of plants, fungi, and animals, especially polysaccharides, have antioxidant activities [67–70]. Antioxidant activities have been the focus of much research into the mechanisms underlying the nutraceutical and therapeutic effects of traditional Chinese medicines, based on various assay methods and activity indices [46, 67].

Many research groups have demonstrated the antioxidant activities of G. pentaphyllum polysaccharides in vitro and in vivo. Li et al. recently demonstrated that GPA1, GPA2, and GPA3, obtained from G. pentaphyllum using a combination of water extraction, ion exchange, and gel permeation chromatography had antioxidant activities [4]. Results showed that GPA3 had a stronger scavenging activity of 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) and hydroxyl radicals; a stronger chelating activity of ferrous ions; and a stronger reducing power than GPA1 and GPA2 in vitro. A novel heteropolysaccharide (GPP-TL) isolated from tetraploid G. pentaphyllum (Makino) leaf by hot water extraction, anion exchange, and gel permeation chromatography had a DPPH• scavenging capacity value of 15.92 μmol TE/g; a HOSC value of 36.42 μmol TE/g; and an ORAC value of 10.83 μmol TE/g under the experimental conditions [9]. Three fractions of polysaccharides, GMA, GMB, and GMC, were isolated and purified from G. pentaphyllum, and their antioxidant activities were evaluated using superoxide radical, hydroxyl radical, and 1,2,3-phentriol self-oxidation assays [62]. The results indicated that GMC possessed a strong scavenging effect of superoxide radicals and inhibited 1,2,3-phentriol self-oxidation, which may have been associated with the physiochemical and monosaccharide composition of these polysaccharides.

GPP1-a, composed of Ara, Gal, and Glc with molar ratios of 0.18:0.72:1.00, significantly prolonged the exercise time to exhaustion in mice; increased glycogen levels and some of antioxidant enzyme activities; and decreased malondialdehyde (MDA) levels in muscle. The results showing that GPP1-a prolonged exercise time to exhaustion in mice may have been associated with scavenging of reactive oxygen species (ROS) [22]. The antioxidant activities of G. pentaphyllum polysaccharides in vivo were reported to be less definitive than in vitro results, indicating that mechanism of polysaccharide antioxidation needs further exploration.

4.2. Immunomodulatory Activity

Immunomodulation is considered an important biological function of natural polysaccharides, which act as immunomodulators and/or biological response modifiers [71, 72]. Studies found that G. pentaphyllum polysaccharides promoted cellular immunity, humoral immunity, and nonspecific immunity. The immunomodulatory activities of G. pentaphyllum polysaccharide conjugates (GPMPP) were previously investigated by Shang et al. in rats [13]. Their results indicated that GPMPP significantly increased splenic and thymic indices; activated macrophages and NK cells; and exhibited activity on normal and Con A/LPS-stimulated splenocytes in a dose-dependent manner in C57BL/6 rats. GPMPP elevated CD4⁺ T lymphocyte counts as well as the CD4⁺/CD8⁺ ratio in a dose-dependent manner and it increased IL-2 levels in the sera and spleen of Cy-immunosuppressed mice. Furthermore, GPMPP also significantly increased SOD, GSH-Px, T-AOC, GSH, and CAT levels and decreased MDA levels. The results showed that GPMPP might play an important role in prevention of oxidative damage in the immune system and indicated that GPMPP had immunomodulatory activity in vivo. Yang et al. reported that PSGP (a water-soluble polysaccharide from G. pentaphyllum herbal tea) reduced peritoneal macrophages to release nitric oxide, ROS, and tumor necrosis factor-alpha and inhibited the proliferation of human colon carcinoma HT-29 and SW-116 cells in vitro in a dose-dependent manner [73].

4.3. Antitumor Activity

It has been reported that the anticancer effects of polysaccharides have strong relationship with their molecules size form, degree of branching, and solubility in water. As we have mentioned before, many previously studies have suggested that polysaccharides exert strong antitumor activity through different mechanisms [30, 74, 75], (1) the prevention of oncogenesis by oral administration of polysaccharides; (2) improving the immune response to tumors; (3) direct antitumor activity through inducing the apoptosis of tumor cells; and (4) preventing the spread or migration of tumor cells in the body [30, 72–76]. Li et al. reported that several G. pentaphyllum polysaccharide fractions (GP-B1 and GP-C1) had a significant inhibitory effect on the growth of melanoma B16 cells in vivo and in vitro [42]. However, GP-B1 and GP-C1 are dissimilar in their chemical compositions and molecular weights, and the lower molecular weight form of GP-B1 had higher antitumor activities. The antitumor actions of acidic polysaccharides were associated with their molecular weights, chemical compositions, and glycosidic linkages [30].

4.4. Hepatoprotective Activity

Only a few studies have demonstrated the direct hepatoprotective effects of G. pentaphyllum polysaccharides. Therefore, more detailed studies are required to clarify the compositional features and hepatoprotective activities of these polysaccharides. Song et al. reported that administration of GPS-3 at doses of 50, 100, or 200 mg/kg body weight prevented the hepatic injury induced by erguotou liquor (16 mL/kg) in mice in a dose-dependent manner. Furthermore, at these dosages, GPS-3 could significantly inhibit increases in serum AST and ALT levels, reduce hepatocyte MDA content, increase GSH content, and reduce hepatocyte necrosis in the injured mice [50].

Low and high doses of G. pentaphyllum polysaccharides (40 and 80 g/kg, respectively) were fed to rats with injured livers induced by carbon tetrachloride. G. pentaphyllum polysaccharides significantly decreased the levels of AST and ALT in liver-injured rats, while iNOS mRNA expression in hepatic tissue was downregulated. In addition, levels of the antiapoptotic protein, Bcl-2/Bax, were elevated in hepatic tissue and there was reduced liver injury. The results indicated that G. pentaphyllum polysaccharides had protective effects on CCl₄-induced liver injury in rats, and whose mechanism of action may have been related to the inhibition of cytotoxicity and antiapoptotic pathways [77].

4.5. Neuroprotective Activity

Many research groups have investigated the neuroprotective effects of polysaccharides in different cell models [78–80]. In vivo and in vitro studies have demonstrated the ability of polysaccharide-rich extracts to provide neuroprotective effects through promotion of neurite outgrowth and activation of NF-κB, PI3K/Akt, MAPK, Nrf2/HO-1 signaling pathways [81]. GPP1 (a purified polysaccharide from G. pentaphyllum) efficiently protected PC-12 cells against Aβ (25-35)-induced cytotoxicity, likely by either preventing oxidative stress, excessive intracellular free calcium concentration influx, or loss of mitochondrial membrane potential or through elevating Bax/Bcl-2 and cleaved caspase-3 protein expression or possibly by a combination of these effects. These findings suggested that GPP1 exerted a neuroprotective effect against Aβ (25-35)-induced neurotoxicity in PC12 cells, at least in part, via inhibiting oxidative stress and suppressing the mitochondrial apoptotic pathway [41].

4.6. Antifatigue Activity

The consumption and depletion of energy sources [82], the production and accumulation of metabolic products [83], the dysfunction of the immune system [84], and excessive generation of ROS, which are highly reactive molecules that can attack and damage cellular structure, all promote exercise-induced fatigue [85, 86]. Many studies have attempted to identify natural antifatigue polysaccharides without adverse effects, to improve athletic ability, postpone fatigue, and to accelerate the elimination of fatigue in humans [87]. Treatment with GPP1-a significantly prolonged exhaustive exercise time of mice. The underlying mechanisms by which GPP1-a prolonged this exhaustive exercise time may have been associated with the role of GPP1-a in scavenging excessive ROS produced during the exercise regime [60].

4.7. Others

G. pentaphyllum polysaccharides were shown to have significant in vivo antidiabetic effects in a type 2 diabetes rat model induced by injection of streptozotocin after consumption of a high fat/sugar diet. Polysaccharide administration significantly lowered levels of blood glucose levels, total cholesterol, triglycerides, low-density lipoprotein, and malondialdehyde and increased blood insulin, superoxide dismutase, and high-density lipoprotein. The results indicated that G. pentaphyllum polysaccharides had hypoglycemic and hypolipidemic effects in rats with streptozotocin-induced type 2 diabetes and that the underlying mechanism associated with these effects might have been related to increases in serum insulin and antioxidant activity [27].

Pharmacological studies of polysaccharides have shed some light on a novel aspect of functional foods in antiaging [88, 89]. The most obvious was the 55.44% inhibition of COX-2 by GPP-S. The inhibition of IL-1β and IL-6 was 30.58% and 20.54%, respectively [18].

5. Correlations of Structure, Content, and Biological Activity

The various biological activities of polysaccharides are strongly related to their chemical compositions and configurations [39, 45]. Few studies regarding the structure-function relationships of these polysaccharides have been reported, and it has been difficult to relate the structures of G. pentaphyllum polysaccharides to their biological activities. Nevertheless, some relationships can be inferred as follows.

It is well-established that the molecular weights of polysaccharides are closely associated with their biological activities [90, 91]. Li et al. prepared a lower molecular weight polysaccharide (GPA3) with a similar composition to other polysaccharides (GPA1 and GPA2), which displayed higher antioxidant activities than GPA1 and GPA2 because its lower molecular weight allowed the spatial conformation of G. pentaphyllum polysaccharides to be maintained [4]. Antioxidation tests in vitro showed that GMC (72 kDa) possessed a stronger scavenging effect of superoxide radicals and inhibited the activity of 1,2,3-phentriol self-oxidation more than GMA (94 kDa) and GMB (120 kDa) [62].

Many glycoconjugates are acidic complex carbohydrates composed of glucuronic acid and galacturonic acid [92]. Uronic acid residues can alter the physiochemical properties and solubility of the associated polysaccharide conjugates and therefore can affect the activities of polysaccharides [31, 61]. Uronic acid in G. pentaphyllum polysaccharides is crucial for their biological activities, and fractions rich in uronic acid have higher bioactivity. GP-C1 contains a similar monosaccharide composition as GP-I and has greater antitumor activities than GP-I in vitro, most likely do the fact that GP-C1 contains galacturonic acids [42, 43].

Previous studies have indicated that the structural characteristics of polysaccharides, such as -(1→4) linkages in the main chain, are important for their biological activities [39]. However, various chemical structures have been reported for G. pentaphyllum polysaccharides including a backbone composed of (1→4)--D-Glcp (Table 2). Overall, different studies have expedited our understanding of the structural basis of the biological effects and biological mechanisms of polysaccharides.

6. Conclusions and Perspectives

G. pentaphyllum (Thunb.) Makino is a source of highly promising traditional medicines and functional foods and has thus gained increasing attention. Over the past thirty years, polysaccharides have been isolated and purified from G. pentaphyllum with various extraction methods, mainly microwave-assisted or ultrasonic-assisted. G. pentaphyllum polysaccharides have a wide range of potent bioactivities, including antioxidant, immunomodulatory, antitumor, hepatoprotective, neuroprotective, and antifatigue activities. Like many other polysaccharides [30], the isolation, structural characterization, and bioactivities of polysaccharides from G. pentaphyllum have been extensively investigated in recent years. However, the relationships between their bioactivities and these high-order structural chemicals are still not well-established because of the great diversity and complexity of the latter. Further research is required to extend our understanding of the functional effects of G. pentaphyllum polysaccharides.

To better determine the effects of G. pentaphyllum polysaccharide metabolites on human health, in vivo studies must be conducted, both in animals and clinical studies, because the limitation of those in vitro studies carried on human tissues and cells. Another important issue is the exploration of potent new technologies, such as the “omics” technologies (i.e., genomics, transcriptomics, metabolomics, and proteomics) and bioinformatics to clarify the different mechanisms underlying the effects of G. pentaphyllum polysaccharides on their bioactivities. This knowledge will help investigators to design more potent health promoting pharmaceuticals and functional foods based on G. pentaphyllum polysaccharide chemical modifications.

Abbreviations

Man: | Mannose
Rha: | Rhamnose
GlcA: | Glucuronic acid
GalA: | Galacturonic acid
Glc: | Glucose
Gal: | Galactose
Xyl: | Xylose
Ara: | Arabinose
Fuc: | Fucose
Rib: | Ribose
Fru: | Fructose
HSQC: | Heteronuclear singular quantum correlation
COSY: | Correlation spectroscopy
HMBC: | Heteronuclear multiple bond correlation
HOSC: | Hydroxyl radical scavenging capacity
ORAC: | Oxygen radical absorbance capacity
SOD: | Superoxide dismutase
GSH-Px: | Glutathione peroxidase
T-AOC: | Total antioxidant capacity
GSH: | Glutathione
CAT: | Catalase
NF-κB: | Nuclear factor-kappaB
PI3K/Akt: | Phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase/serine/threonine kinase
MAPK: | Mitogen-activated protein kinase
Nrf2/HO-1: | Nuclear factor-erythroid 2 related factor 2/ heme oxygenase-1.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

Xiaolong Ji and Yingbin Shen contributed equally to this work

Acknowledgments

This research was financially supported by PhD Research Fund of Hebei University of Chinese Medicine (BSZ2018010) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC31401650).

References

A. Attawish, S. Chivapat, S. Phadungpat et al., “Chronic toxicity of Gynostemma pentaphyllum,” Fitoterapia, vol. 75, no. 6, pp. 539–551, 2004.

J.-H. Hu, Q.-W. Li, T. Zhang, and Z.-L. Jiang, “Effect of Gynostemma Pentaphyllum Polysaccharide on boar spermatozoa quality following freezing-thawing,” Cryobiology, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 244–249, 2009.

X. Shang, C. Qin, G. Cao et al., “Advance in research on the polysaccharide from Gynostemma Pentaphyllum Makino,” Natural Product Research and Development, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 514–518, 2010.

B. Li, X. Zhang, M. Wang, and L. Jiao, “Characterization and antioxidant activities of acidic polysaccharides from Gynostemma pentaphyllum (Thunb.) Markino,” Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 127, pp. 209–214, 2015.

Y. Lv, X. B. Yang, Y. Zhao, Y. Ruan, Y. Yang, and Z. Z. Wang, “Separation and quantification of component monosaccharides of the tea polysaccharides from Gynostemma pentaphyllum by HPLC with indirect UV detection,” Food Chemistry, vol. 112, no. 3, pp. 742–746, 2009.

V. Razmovski-Naumovski, T. H.-W. Huang, V. H. Tran, G. Q. Li, C. C. Duke, and B. D. Roufogalis, “Chemistry and pharmacology of Gynostemma pentaphyllum,” Phytochemistry Reviews, vol. 4, no. 2-3, pp. 197–219, 2005.

S. Z. Li, People’s Health Publisher, Beijing, China, 1985.

J. G. Cheng, “Investigation of the plant Jiaogulan and its analogous herb, Wulianmei,” Zhong Cao Yao, vol. 21, pp. 424-425, 1990.

Y. Niu, W. Yan, J. Lv, W. Yao, and L. Yu, “Characterization of a novel polysaccharide from tetraploid Gynostemma pentaphyllum Makino,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 61, no. 20, pp. 4882–4889, 2013.

X. Wang, Q. Wang, and S. Li, “Research progress and application of Gynostemma pentaphyllum polysaccharides,” Guangxi Journal of Light Industry, no. 6, pp. 20–22, 2010.

Q. Deng and X. Yang, “Protective effects of Gynostemma pentaphyllum polysaccharides on PC12 cells impaired by MPP+,” International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, vol. 69, pp. 171–175, 2014.

M. K. Sanavova and D. A. Rakhimov, “Plant polysaccharides: VII. Polysaccharides of Morus and their hypoglycemic activity,” Chemistry of Natural Compounds, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 617–619, 1997.

X. Shang, Y. Chao, Y. Zhang, C. Lu, C. Xu, and W. Niu, “Immunomodulatory and antioxidant effects of polysaccharides from Gynostemma pentaphyllum Makino in immunosuppressed mice,” Molecules, vol. 21, no. 8, article no. 1085, 2016.

Z. Xie, H. Huang, Y. Zhao et al., “Chemical composition and anti-proliferative and anti-inflammatory effects of the leaf and whole-plant samples of diploid and tetraploid Gynostemma pentaphyllum (Thunb.) Makino,” Food Chemistry, vol. 132, no. 1, pp. 125–133, 2012.

W. Yan, Y. Niu, J. Lv et al., “Characterization of a heteropolysaccharide isolated from diploid Gynostemma pentaphyllum Makino,” Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 92, no. 2, pp. 2111–2117, 2013.

Y. Li, W. Lin, J. Huang, Y. Xie, and W. Ma, “Anti-cancer effects of Gynostemma pentaphyllum (Thunb.) Makino (Jiaogulan),” Chinese Medicine, vol. 11, pp. 43–58, 2016.

D. Fan, Y. Kuang, and S. Xiang, “Research progress in chemical constituents and pharmacological activities of Gynostemma pentaphyllum,” Chinese Pharmaceutical Journal, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 342–352, 2017.

P. P. Shang, Structure and anti-inflammatory effect of a polysaccharides from tetraploid Gynostemma pentaphyllum makino [M.S. thesis], Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China, 2014.

T. Chen, B. Li, Y. Li, C. Zhao, J. Shen, and H. Zhang, “Catalytic synthesis and antitumor activities of sulfated polysaccharide from Gynostemma pentaphyllum Makino,” Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 83, no. 2, pp. 554–560, 2011.

J. Liu, L. Zhang, Y. Ren, Y. Gao, L. Kang, and Q. Qiao, “Anticancer and immunoregulatory activity of Gynostemma pentaphyllum polysaccharides in H22 tumor-bearing mice,” International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, vol. 69, pp. 1–4, 2014.

F. R. Zuo, Effects of Gynostemma Pentaphyllum polysaccharides on immune function in immunosupperssed mice [M.S. thesis], Guangxi University, Nanning, China, 2017.

A.-P. Chi, J.-P. Chen, Z.-Z. Wang, Z.-Y. Xiong, and Q.-X. Li, “Morphological and structural characterization of a polysaccharide from Gynostemma pentaphyllum Makino and its anti-exercise fatigue activity,” Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 74, no. 4, pp. 868–874, 2008.

S. Lin-Na and S. Yong-Xiu, “Effects of polysaccharides from Gynostemma pentaphyllum (Thunb.), Makino on physical fatigue,” African journal of traditional, complementary, and alternative medicines : AJTCAM / African Networks on Ethnomedicines, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 112–117, 2014.

B. Qi and H. Huang, “Anti-fatigue effects of polysaccharides from Gynostemma pentaphyllum makino by forced swimming test,” Advanced Materials Research, vol. 881-883, pp. 426–429, 2014.

Z. P. Xiao, The Protective Effect of Gynostemma Pentaphyllum polysaccharides on chemical liver injury [M.S. thesis], Shandong University, Jinan, China, 2008.

Q. Deng, Protection of Gynostemma pentaphyllum polysaccharides against MPP+-induced PC12 cell damage and the underlying mechanisms [Ph.D. thesis], XinJiang Medical University, Wulumuqi, China, 2015.

X. Du, Y. Hou, H. Tan et al., “Hypoglycemic activity of polysaccharide from Gynostemma pentaphyllum on type 2 diabetic rats and its mechanism,” Science Technology and Engineering, vol. 11, no. 24, pp. 5754–5758, 2011.

X. He, X. Wang, J. Fang et al., “Structures, biological activities, and industrial applications of the polysaccharides from Hericium erinaceus (Lion's Mane) mushroom: A review,” International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, vol. 97, pp. 228–237, 2017.

X. He, X. Wang, J. Fang et al., “Polysaccharides in Grifola frondosa mushroom and their health promoting properties: A review,” International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, vol. 101, pp. 910–921, 2017.

X. Ji, Q. Peng, Y. Yuan, J. Shen, X. Xie, and M. Wang, “Isolation, structures and bioactivities of the polysaccharides from jujube fruit (Ziziphus jujuba Mill.): A review,” Food Chemistry, vol. 227, pp. 349–357, 2017.

M. Jin, K. Zhao, Q. Huang, C. Xu, and P. Shang, “Isolation, structure and bioactivities of the polysaccharides from Angelica sinensis (Oliv.) Diels: A review,” Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 89, no. 3, pp. 713–722, 2012.

L. Shi, “Bioactivities, isolation and purification methods of polysaccharides from natural products: A review,” International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, vol. 92, pp. 37–48, 2016.

X. He, J. Fang, Y. Ruan et al., “Structures, bioactivities and future prospective of polysaccharides from Morus alba (white mulberry): A review,” Food Chemistry, vol. 245, pp. 899–910, 2018.

A. Chi and J. Chen, “Study on microwave-assisted extraction of Gynostemma pentaphyllum polysaccharides,” Food Science, vol. 28, no. 7, pp. 181–184, 2007.

X. Lin, Y. Gao, and S. Zhao, “The response surface design optimization of Gynostemma polysaccharide extraction process,” Chemical Production and Technology, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 22–24, 2013.

X. Y. Shang, Y. Zhang, Y. L. Bai, C. L. Xu, W. N. Niu, and C. G. Qin, “Extraction and antioxidant activities of polysaccharides from Gynostemma pentaphyllum makino,” Asian Journal of Chemistry, vol. 25, no. 16, pp. 9092–9096, 2013.

Z. Wang, D. Luo, and C. Ena, “Optimization of polysaccharides extraction from Gynostemma pentaphyllum Makino using Uniform Design,” Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 311–317, 2007.

B. Z. Zhou, The separation, purifieation and antioxidant activity of poylsaccharides from Gynostemma Pentaphyllum [M.S. thesis], Shaanxi Normal University, Xian, China, 2011.

S. P. Wasser, “Medicinal mushrooms as a source of antitumor and immunomodulating polysaccharides,” Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 258–274, 2002.

V. Samavati and M. S. Yarmand, “Statistical modeling of process parameters for the recovery of polysaccharide from Morus alba leaf,” Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 98, no. 1, pp. 793–806, 2013.

D. Jia, C. Rao, S. Xue, and J. Lei, “Purification, characterization and neuroprotective effects of a polysaccharide from Gynostemma pentaphyllum,” Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 122, pp. 93–100, 2015.

X.-L. Li, Z.-H. Wang, Y.-X. Zhao et al., “Isolation and antitumor activities of acidic polysaccharide from Gynostemma pentaphyllum Makino,” Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 89, no. 3, pp. 942–947, 2012.

X.-L. Li, Z.-H. Wang, Y.-X. Zhao et al., “Purification of a polysaccharide from Gynostemma pentaphyllum Makino and its therapeutic advantages for psoriasis,” Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 89, no. 4, pp. 1232–1237, 2012.

M. Dubois, K. A. Gilles, J. K. Hamilton, P. A. Rebers, and F. Smith, “Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances,” Analytical Chemistry, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 350–356, 1956.

S.-P. Nie and M.-Y. Xie, “A review on the isolation and structure of tea polysaccharides and their bioactivities,” Food Hydrocolloids, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 144–149, 2011.

L. Yang and L.-M. Zhang, “Chemical structural and chain conformational characterization of some bioactive polysaccharides isolated from natural sources,” Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 76, no. 3, pp. 349–361, 2009.

M. Zhang, S. W. Cui, P. C. K. Cheung, and Q. Wang, “Antitumor polysaccharides from mushrooms: a review on their isolation process, structural characteristics and antitumor activity,” Trends in Food Science & Technology, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 4–19, 2007.

J.-K. Yan, W.-Q. Wang, and J.-Y. Wu, “Recent advances in Cordyceps sinensis polysaccharides: mycelial fermentation, isolation, structure, and bioactivities: a review,” Journal of Functional Foods, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 33–47, 2014.

S. L. Song, The separation, purifieation and pharmacologieal aetion researeh of Gynostemma Pentaphyllum poylsaccharides [M.S. thesis], Shandong University, Jinan, China, 2006.

S. L. Song, Z. P. Xiao, H. Liang, Y. S. Wang, and A. G. Ji, “Protective effects of Gynostemma pentaphyllum Makino polysaccharide on alcoholic hepatic injuries,” Advanced Materials Research, vol. 781-784, pp. 668–673, 2013.

S. S. Ferreira, C. P. Passos, P. Madureira, M. Vilanova, and M. A. Coimbra, “Structure-function relationships of immunostimulatory polysaccharides: A review,” Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 132, pp. 378–396, 2015.

F. Zhang, L. Lin, and J. Xie, “A mini-review of chemical and biological properties of polysaccharides from Momordica charantia,” International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, vol. 92, pp. 246–253, 2016.

X. B. Guo, Preparation, physicochemical characteristics and antioxidant activity of polysaccharide from Gynostemma Pentaphyllum [M.S. thesis], Anhui University of Chinese Medicine, Hefei, China, 2013.

Z. Zhang and W. Zhang, “Extraction and physi-chemical property research of polysaccharide from Gynostemma pentaphyllum,” Forest by-Product and Speciality in China, no. 6, pp. 1–4, 2007.

J. Fan and J. Yu, “Optimization of extracting process for polysaccharides from Gynostemma pentaphyllum,” Science and Technology of Food Industry, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 199–202, 2010.

D. Luo and Z. Wang, “The research of polysaccharide extraction from Gynostemma pentaphyllum,” Science and Technology of Food Industry, vol. 26, no. 11, pp. 129–131, 2005.

P. Zhao, L. Ou, and W. Li, “Study on optimization for ultrasonic wave extraction of polysaccharide from Gynostemma pentaphyllum,” Journal of Anhui Agricultural Science, vol. 37, no. 18, pp. 8472-8473, 2009.

J. Li, Y. Yang, D. Su et al., “Optimization extraction technology of polysaccharides from Gynostemma pentaphyllum by using response surface method,” Food Science and Technology, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 142–147, 2011.

F. Wang, Structure analysis, antibacterial activity and application research of polysaccharides from Gynostemma pentaphyllum [M.S. thesis], Guangxi University, Nanning, China, 2013.

A. Chi, L. Tang, J. Zhang, and K. Zhang, “Chemical composition of three polysaccharides from Gynostemma pentaphyllum and their antioxidant activity in skeletal muscle of exercised mice,” International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 479–485, 2012.

X. B. Yang, Y. Zhao, Y. Yang, and Y. Ruan, “Isolation and characterization of immunostimulatory polysaccharide from an herb tea, Gynostemma pentaphyllum makino,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 56, no. 16, pp. 6905–6909, 2008.

Z. Wang and D. Luo, “Antioxidant activities of different fractions of polysaccharide purified from Gynostemma pentaphyllum Makino,” Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 54–58, 2007.

F. Aktan, S. Henness, B. D. Roufogalis, and A. J. Ammit, “Gypenosides derived from Gynostemma pentaphyllum suppress NO synthesis in murine macrophages by inhibiting iNOS enzymatic activity and attenuating NF-κB-mediated iNOS protein expression,” Nitric Oxide: Biology and Chemistry, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 235–242, 2003.

C. Circosta, R. De Pasquale, and F. Occhiuto, “Cardiovascular effects of the aqueous extract of Gynostemma pentaphyllum Makino,” Phytomedicine, vol. 12, no. 9, pp. 638–643, 2005.

T. H.-W. Huang, V. Razmovski-Naumovski, N. K. Salam et al., “A novel LXR-α activator identified from the natural product Gynostemma pentaphyllum,” Biochemical Pharmacology, vol. 70, no. 9, pp. 1298–1308, 2005.

J. Yeo, Y. J. Kang, S. M. Jeon et al., “Potential hypoglycemic effect of an ethanol extract of Gynostemma pentaphyllum in C57BL/KsJ-db/db mice,” Journal of Medicinal Food, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 709–716, 2008.

K. Schlesier, M. Harwat, V. Böhm, and R. Bitsch, “Assessment of antioxidant activity by using different in vitro methods,” Free Radical Research, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 177–187, 2002.

J. Wang, S. Hu, S. Nie, Q. Yu, and M. Xie, “Reviews on Mechanisms of In Vitro Antioxidant Activity of Polysaccharides,” Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity, vol. 2016, Article ID 5692852, 13 pages, 2016.

J. Zhang, X. Xiao, Y. Dong, L. Shi, T. Xu, and F. Wu, “The anti-obesity effect of fermented barley extracts with Lactobacillus plantarum dy-1 and Saccharomyces cerevisiae in diet-induced obese rats,” Food & Function, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 1132–1143, 2017.

P. A. S. White, R. C. M. Oliveira, A. P. Oliveira et al., “Antioxidant activity and mechanisms of action of natural compounds isolated from lichens: a systematic review,” Molecules, vol. 19, no. 9, pp. 14496–14527, 2014.

X. Meng, H. Liang, and L. Luo, “Antitumor polysaccharides from mushrooms: a review on the structural characteristics, antitumor mechanisms and immunomodulating activities,” Carbohydrate Research, vol. 424, pp. 30–41, 2016.

M.-F. Moradali, H. Mostafavi, S. Ghods, and G.-A. Hedjaroude, “Immunomodulating and anticancer agents in the realm of macromycetes fungi (macrofungi),” International Immunopharmacology, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 701–724, 2007.

X. Yang, Y. Zhao, and Y. Lv, “In vivo macrophage activation and physicochemical property of the different polysaccharide fractions purified from Angelica sinensis,” Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 71, no. 3, pp. 372–379, 2008.

J. Zhao, J. E. Kim, E. Reed, and Q. Q. Li, “Molecular mechanism of antitumor activity of taxanes in lung cancer (Review),” International Journal of Oncology, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 247–256, 2005.

L. Ren, C. Perera, and Y. Hemar, “Antitumor activity of mushroom polysaccharides: a review,” Food & Function, vol. 3, no. 11, pp. 1118–1130, 2012.

L. Wu, J. Sun, X. Su, Q. Yu, Q. Yu, and P. Zhang, “A review about the development of fucoidan in antitumor activity: Progress and challenges,” Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 154, pp. 96–111, 2016.

C. Zhang, “Protective effect of Gynostemma Pentaphyllum poylsaccharide on liver injure by carbon tetrachloride in rats,” Chinese Journal of Experimental Traditional Medical Formulae, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 244–247, 2013.

J. Gong, F. Sun, Y. Li et al., “Momordica charantia polysaccharides could protect against cerebral ischemia/reperfusion injury through inhibiting oxidative stress mediated c-Jun N-terminal kinase 3 signaling pathway,” Neuropharmacology, vol. 91, pp. 123–134, 2015.

P. Teng, Y. Li, W. Cheng, L. Zhou, Y. Shen, and Y. Wang, “Neuroprotective effects of Lycium barbarum polysaccharides in lipopolysaccharide-induced BV2 microglial cells,” Molecular Medicine Reports, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 1977–1981, 2013.

D. Wei, T. Chen, M. Yan et al., “Synthesis, characterization, antioxidant activity and neuroprotective effects of selenium polysaccharide from Radix hedysari,” Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 125, pp. 161–168, 2015.

Q.-H. Gao, X. Fu, R. Zhang, Z. Wang, and M. Guo, “Neuroprotective effects of plant polysaccharides: A review of the mechanisms,” International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, vol. 106, pp. 749–754, 2018.

X.-L. Zhang, F. Ren, W. Huang, R.-T. Ding, Q.-S. Zhou, and X.-W. Liu, “Anti-fatigue activity of extracts of stem bark from Acanthopanax senticosus,” Molecules, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 28–37, 2011.

T. H. Pedersen, O. B. Nielsen, G. D. Lamb, and D. G. Stephenson, “Intracellular acidosis enhances the excitability of working muscle,” Science, vol. 305, no. 5687, pp. 1144–1147, 2004.

A. D. Harper Smith, S. L. Coakley, M. D. Ward, A. W. Macfarlane, P. S. Friedmann, and N. P. Walsh, “Exercise-induced stress inhibits both the induction and elicitation phases of in vivo T-cell-mediated immune responses in humans,” Brain, Behavior, and Immunity, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 1136–1142, 2011.

K. Azizbeigi, S. R. Stannard, S. Atashak, and M. Mosalman Haghighi, “Antioxidant enzymes and oxidative stress adaptation to exercise training: Comparison of endurance, resistance, and concurrent training in untrained males,” Journal of Exercise Science & Fitness, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–6, 2014.

A. Chi, H. Li, C. Kang et al., “Anti-fatigue activity of a novel polysaccharide conjugates from Ziyang green tea,” International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, vol. 80, pp. 566–572, 2015.

S. Zhou and J. Jiang, “Anti-fatigue effects of active ingredients from traditional Chinese medicine: a review,” Current Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 24, 2017.

H. Hasani-Ranjbar, S. Khosravi, N. Nayebi, B. Larijani, and M. Abdollahi, “A systematic review of the efficacy and safety of anti-aging herbs in animals and human,” Asian Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, vol. 7, no. 8, pp. 621–640, 2012.

Z. A. M. Yasin, F. Ibrahim, N. N. Rashid, M. F. M. Razif, and R. Yusof, “The importance of some plant extracts as skin anti-aging resources: A review,” Current Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, vol. 18, no. 11, pp. 864–876, 2017.

M. Soltani, H. Kamyab, and H. A. El-Enshasy, “Molecular weight (Mw) and monosaccharide composition (MC): Two major factors affecting the therapeutic action of polysaccharides extracted from Cordyceps sinensis-mini review,” Journal of Pure and Applied Microbiology, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 1601–1613, 2013.

A. Zong, H. Cao, and F. Wang, “Anticancer polysaccharides from natural resources: a review of recent research,” Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 90, no. 4, pp. 1395–1410, 2012.

H. Chen, M. Zhang, and B. Xie, “Quantification of uronic acids in tea polysaccharide conjugates and their antioxidant properties,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 52, no. 11, pp. 3333–3336, 2004.