BioMed Research International
Volume 2019 (2019), Article ID 3842312, 10 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/3842312

Research Article

What Changed on the Folliculogenesis in the Process of Mouse Ovarian Aging?

Wenlei Ye,¹ Wei Shen,¹ Wei Yan,¹ Su Zhou,¹ Jing Cheng,1,2 Guangxin Pan,1,3 Meng Wu,¹ Lingwei Ma,¹ Aiyue Luo,¹ and Shixuan Wang¹

¹Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
²Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China
³Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Central Hospital of Wuhan, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China

Correspondence should be addressed to Aiyue Luo; aiyueluo@163.com and Shixuan Wang; shixuanwang@tjh.tjmu.edu.cn

Received 16 November 2018; Revised 15 January 2019; Accepted 30 January 2019; Published 1 April 2019

Academic Editor: Siddharth Pratap

Copyright © 2019 Wenlei Ye et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

There are about 1-2 million follicles presented in the ovary at birth, while only around 1000 primordial follicles are left at menopause. The ovarian function also decreases in parallel with aging. Folliculogenesis is vital for ovarian function, no matter the synthesis of female hormones or ovulation, yet the mechanisms for its changing with increasing age are not fully understood. Early follicle growth up to the large preantral stage is independent of gonadotropins in rodents and relies on intraovarian factors. To further understand the age-related molecular changes in the process of folliculogenesis, we performed microarray gene expression profile analysis using total RNA extracted from young (9 weeks old) and old (32 weeks old) mouse ovarian secondary follicles. The results of our current microarray study revealed that there were 371 (≥2-fold, q-value ≤0.05) genes differentially expressed in which 174 genes were upregulated and 197 genes were downregulated in old mouse ovarian secondary follicles compared to young mouse ovarian secondary follicles. The gene ontology and KEGG pathway analysis of differentially expressed genes uncovered critical biological functions such as immune system process, aging, transcription, DNA replication, DNA repair, protein stabilization, and apoptotic process were affected in the process of aging. The considerable changes in gene expression profile may have an adverse influence on follicle quality and folliculogenesis. Our study provided information on the processes that may contribute to age-related decline in ovarian function.

1. Introduction

Ovarian aging results in the cessation of ovarian function, that is, anovulation and a decrease in gonadal steroids secretion. The anovulation causes loss of fertility and reduced hormone production results in multiple health consequences, including vasomotor symptoms, cardiovascular disease, osteoporosis, cognitive dysfunction, depression, mood disorders, sexual dysfunction, vaginal atrophy, and even mortality [1, 2]. The age at which natural menopause occurs may be a marker of ovarian aging which is considered to be the multiple pacemakers [3].

Ovarian follicle is the basic unit of ovarian physiological function. After puberty, the periodic development of the ovarian follicles enables the ovary to produce female hormones to maintain secondary sexual characteristics and ovulation. The reproductive aging process is considered to be dominated by the gradual decrease of both the quantity and the quality of the oocytes residing within the follicles present in the ovarian cortex [4]. Females have approximately 1-2 million primordial follicles at birth [5, 6]. After birth, the number of follicles decreases gradually with increasing age through atresia with some 300,000 to 400,000 primordial follicles remaining at menarche [4, 7]. During the reproductive years, the number of primordial follicles declines until a critical threshold when only about 1000 left at the time of menopause [8–10].

The information on the hormonal changes observed gradual decline of the follicle pool and the reduced oocyte quality during ovarian aging is quite a bit; however, the molecular mechanisms behind that are still not fully understood. Studies have shown that accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and free radicals and the action of environmental factors such as radiation and chemotherapeutic drugs used in cancer patients can cause DNA damage in the oocytes during long periods of dictyate arrest and without repairing, the extent of DNA damage may cause genomic abnormalities (chromosomal breakages and mutations) leading to cell death and follicle atresia [11, 12]. Researches have revealed that the expression of BRCA1 (breast cancer type 1) related DNA repair decreased in the process of ovarian aging in rat and buffalo primordial follicles [13, 14]. Laboratory and clinical studies also demonstrated that expression of BRCA1 declines in single mouse and human oocytes and BRCA1 mutation is associated with primary ovarian insufficiency [15–17].

A better understanding of follicle biology is essential to help make ovarian aging process explicit. Early follicle growth up to the large preantral stage is independent of gonadotropins in rodents and relies on intraovarian factors [6]. Thus in our present study, the secondary follicles from young and old mice ovaries were used to investigate the changes of expression profile during ovarian aging by genome-wide microarray analysis.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Isolation of Secondary Follicles from the Mouse Ovary

The experimental animals were maintained as per the guidelines of the Animal Care Committee of Tongji Hospital within the Tongji Medical College at the Huazhong University of Science and Technology in China. The 9-week old and 32-week old, specific pathogen-free (SPF), female C57BL/6J mice were obtained from Beijing Vital River Laboratory Animal Technology Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China). All mice were killed by decapitation and ovaries were collected free of adhering tissue. Under the stereomicroscope, follicles with diameter of 120-140 μm, an intact basal membrane, a central and spherical oocyte surrounded by granulosa cells were mechanically dissecting by 2 syringe needles. The ovarian secondary follicles were stored at −80°C.

2.2. RNA Isolation and Microarray Analysis

The total RNA of the ovarian secondary follicles was extracted with RNAiso plus reagent according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Takara, Japan). Of the total of 6 samples, 3 replicate samples were from young mouse ovarian secondary follicles and 3 replicate samples were from old mouse ovarian secondary follicles. All RNA samples were stored in DEPC in order to prevent RNA degeneration. GeneChip hybridization for each sample was examined on Affymetrix 3’ IVT Expression Arrays (Mouse Genome 430 2.0 array) at Bioassay Laboratory of CapitalBio Corporation. The technical procedures and quality controls were performed at the CapitalBio Corporation. Hybridization assay procedures were as described in the GeneChip Expression Analysis Technical Manual (http://www.affymetrix.com).

2.3. Microarray Data Analysis

The raw data from microarray analysis was normalized using robust multiarray average (RMA) algorithm. The differentially expressed genes with a fold change ≥2 and a q-value ≤0.05 were identified using Significant Analysis of Microarray (SAM) software. For visualization of differentially expressed genes, unsupervised hierarchical clustering was performed using HemI 1.0.3.7 software (http://hemi.biocuckoo.org/down.php) [18]. Gene Ontology (GO) consisting of three items: molecular functions, biological processes, and cellular components [19] and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG), a set of high-throughput genes and protein pathways [20], analyses of differentially expressed genes were performed using the DAVID online tools (https://david.ncifcrf.gov/) compared with the mouse whole genome [21]. Whole Mouse Genome was used as the reference group. Statistical significance was calculated with a standard hypergeometric equation corrected by a Benjamini Yekutelli correction for multiple testing, which takes into account the dependency among the GO categories. The minimal length of considered GO-paths was 2. Significance was set at corrected p-value < 0.05. The Search Tool for the Tetrieval of Interacting Genes (STRING) database (http://string-db.org/), an online software that provides comprehensive interactions of lists of proteins and genes, was used to build a PPI network of the differentially expressed genes [22]. The cut-off criteria of the minimum required interaction score were 0.7 for the PPI network. The visualizing of the PPI network was constructed using the Cytoscape software (version 3.6.1) [23]. The Clustering with Overlapping Neighborhood Expansion (ClusterONE) plug-in for Cytoscape was used to detect protein complexes in the PPI network [24]. The gene regulatory network modeling for selected differentially expressed genes was performed using Cytoscape software (version 3.6.1).

3. Results

3.1. Global Gene Expression Analysis of Secondary Follicles from Mouse Ovaries

To characterize the genes that are associated with mouse ovarian aging, we examined the gene expression profile of secondary follicles from young and old mouse ovaries. The expression values of all the six samples (three samples each from young and old mouse ovaries) were normalized using the robust multiarray average (RMA) method. The results of our microarray data were made available in the public domain NCBI-GEO repository (accession ID: GSE121493). The box-whisker plot analysis of normalized data showed uniform distribution of the expression levels in both intra- and intersample manner indicating reliable hybridization (see Figure 1). Summary statistics showed effectiveness of quantile normalization as 50th percentile values were close to 4.9. After normalization of raw data for all three biological replicates, the R package significance analysis of microarray (SAM) was used to identify genes that are differentially expressed in secondary follicles from young and old mouse ovaries (fold change ≥2 or ≤0.5 and q-value ≤0.05). And the results revealed that 371 genes were differentially expressed between the two groups, while 174 genes were upregulated and 197 genes were downregulated in the secondary follicles from the old mouse ovaries compared to those from the young mouse ovaries. Further, unsupervised hierarchical clustering analysis using the HemI 1.0.3.7 software showed distinct patterns of up- and downregulated genes in the secondary follicles from young and old mouse ovaries (see Figure 2).

Figure 1: Box and whisker plot (Box plot). We performed the comparison of gene expression with a total of six samples from young (n=3) and old (n=3) mouse ovarian secondary follicles by using Affymetrix 3’ IVT Expression Arrays (Mouse Genome 430 2.0 array) at Bioassay Laboratory of CapitalBio Corporation. Robust multiarray average (RMA) algorithm was used to eliminate the variation in the arrays from noisy data. Box plot was constructed to illustrate the distribution of normalized probe hybridization signal intensities (log ratios) for all six arrays (young and old mouse ovarian secondary follicles). The probe distribution by 0-100% quantiles as whiskers, the 25-75% quantiles as different color boxes, and the 50% quantile as horizontal line within the box indicated a similar range of signal intensities and confirmed perfect hybridization.

Figure 2: Heat map visualization for selected differentially expressed genes. Heat map was produced by unsupervised hierarchical-clustering analysis from microarray data for top 50 upregulated genes and top 50 downregulated genes in old mouse ovarian secondary follicles compared to young. The relative expression levels of each gene are mentioned in different colors. The red lines represent high expression, while blue lines represent low expression. The numbers in the right side, corresponding to the different colors, represent the relative expression levels of each gene.

3.2. Functional Annotation for the Differentially Expressed Genes

The identified differentially expressed genes in the secondary follicles from the old mouse ovaries compared to those from the young mouse ovaries were further analyzed via gene ontology (GO) and KEGG pathway analysis using the DAVID online tool. As shown in Table 1, GO term enrichment analysis showed that the upregulated genes were significantly enriched in immune system process in the biological processes category, cytoplasm, and nucleus in the cellular component category and RNA and DNA binding in the molecular function category. While listed in Table 2, the functional annotation for the downregulated genes revealed that the most significant categories of biological process were involved in transcription and its regulation, cellular component was involved in nucleus and cytoplasm, and molecular function was involved in protein, RNA, and DNA binding. Furthermore, KEGG pathway analysis showed that most of the upregulated genes took part in virus related and Toll-like receptor signaling pathways, whereas downregulated genes mainly participated in PI3K-Akt signaling pathway and Adherens junction in Table 3.

Table 1: Functional enrichment analysis of upregulated genes in the old mouse ovarian secondary follicles compared to young mouse.

Category
Term
Count
%
P Value

GOTERM_BP_DIRECT
GO:0035458~cellular response to interferon-beta
15
8.6
5.62E-21

GOTERM_BP_DIRECT
GO:0009615~response to virus
18
10.3
6.73E-21

GOTERM_BP_DIRECT
GO:0051607~defense response to virus
21
12.1
1.15E-19

GOTERM_BP_DIRECT
GO:0002376~immune system process
24
13.8
1.01E-15

GOTERM_BP_DIRECT
GO:0045087~innate immune response
23
13.2
2.70E-14

GOTERM_BP_DIRECT
GO:0071346~cellular response to interferon-gamma
9
5.2
1.80E-08

GOTERM_BP_DIRECT
GO:0042832~defense response to protozoan
6
3.4
1.60E-06

GOTERM_BP_DIRECT
GO:0006952~defense response
8
4.6
1.36E-05

GOTERM_BP_DIRECT
GO:0032870~cellular response to hormone stimulus
6
3.4
1.57E-05

GOTERM_BP_DIRECT
GO:0034097~response to cytokine
7
4.0
1.79E-05

GOTERM_CC_DIRECT
GO:0020005~symbiont-containing vacuole membrane
5
2.9
1.46E-07

GOTERM_CC_DIRECT
GO:0005829~cytosol
28
16.1
7.00E-05

GOTERM_CC_DIRECT
GO:0005737~cytoplasm
65
37.4
6.61E-04

GOTERM_CC_DIRECT
GO:0005634~nucleus
58
33.3
2.75E-03

GOTERM_CC_DIRECT
GO:0048471~perinuclear region of cytoplasm
12
6.9
8.23E-03

GOTERM_CC_DIRECT
GO:0072562~blood microparticle
5
2.9
1.34E-02

GOTERM_CC_DIRECT
GO:0031225~anchored component of membrane
5
2.9
1.63E-02

GOTERM_CC_DIRECT
GO:0009897~external side of plasma membrane
7
4.0
2.23E-02

GOTERM_MF_DIRECT
GO:0003725~double-stranded RNA binding
9
5.2
2.62E-08

GOTERM_MF_DIRECT
GO:0003690~double-stranded DNA binding
11
6.3
3.33E-08

GOTERM_MF_DIRECT
GO:0003924~GTPase activity
11
6.3
1.81E-06

GOTERM_MF_DIRECT
GO:0005525~GTP binding
12
6.9
6.76E-05

GOTERM_MF_DIRECT
GO:0008134~transcription factor binding
10
5.7
5.97E-04

GOTERM_MF_DIRECT
GO:0003723~RNA binding
15
8.6
9.40E-04

GOTERM_MF_DIRECT
GO:0003677~DNA binding
25
14.4
1.58E-03

GOTERM_MF_DIRECT
GO:0001730~2′-5′-oligoadenylate synthetase activity
3
1.7
2.48E-03

GOTERM_MF_DIRECT
GO:0016817~hydrolase activity, acting on acid anhydrides
3
1.7
2.48E-03

GOTERM_MF_DIRECT
GO:0001077~transcriptional activator activity, RNA polymerase II core promoter proximal region sequence-specific binding
8
4.6
2.65E-03

of enriched genes in each term. The top ten terms based on P value were chosen in each category.

Table 2: Functional enrichment analysis of downregulated genes in the old mouse ovarian secondary follicles compared to young mouse.

Category
Term
Count
%
P value

GOTERM_BP_DIRECT
GO:0006355~regulation of transcription, DNA-templated
42
21.3
7.02E-05

GOTERM_BP_DIRECT
GO:0016311~dephosphorylation
8
4.1
9.84E-05

GOTERM_BP_DIRECT
GO:0006351~transcription, DNA-templated
35
17.8
3.19E-04

GOTERM_BP_DIRECT
GO:0045893~positive regulation of transcription, DNA-templated
16
8.1
5.56E-04

GOTERM_BP_DIRECT
GO:0030335~positive regulation of cell migration
9
4.6
8.87E-04

GOTERM_BP_DIRECT
GO:0006470~protein dephosphorylation
7
3.6
2.39E-03

GOTERM_BP_DIRECT
GO:0043154~negative regulation of cysteine-type endopeptidase activity involved in apoptotic process
5
2.5
4.21E-03

GOTERM_BP_DIRECT
GO:0030177~positive regulation of Wnt signaling pathway
4
2.0
5.61E-03

GOTERM_BP_DIRECT
GO:0043065~positive regulation of apoptotic process
10
5.1
5.85E-03

GOTERM_BP_DIRECT
GO:0097194~execution phase of apoptosis
3
1.5
6.92E-03

GOTERM_CC_DIRECT
GO:0005634~nucleus
106
53.8
3.23E-13

GOTERM_CC_DIRECT
GO:0005737~cytoplasm
100
50.8
4.49E-08

GOTERM_CC_DIRECT
GO:0005654~nucleoplasm
44
22.3
9.26E-08

GOTERM_CC_DIRECT
GO:0070062~extracellular exosome
50
25.4
3.19E-06

GOTERM_CC_DIRECT
GO:0043234~protein complex
19
9.6
3.26E-05

GOTERM_CC_DIRECT
GO:0071013~catalytic step 2 spliceosome
6
3.0
2.24E-03

GOTERM_CC_DIRECT
GO:0005925~focal adhesion
11
5.6
4.30E-03

GOTERM_CC_DIRECT
GO:0005829~cytosol
29
14.7
5.76E-03

GOTERM_CC_DIRECT
GO:0030529~intracellular ribonucleoprotein complex
9
4.6
1.17E-02

GOTERM_CC_DIRECT
GO:0005911~cell-cell junction
7
3.6
1.26E-02

GOTERM_MF_DIRECT
GO:0005515~protein binding
77
39.1
6.99E-09

GOTERM_MF_DIRECT
GO:0044822~poly(A) RNA binding
30
15.2
2.52E-06

GOTERM_MF_DIRECT
GO:0003723~RNA binding
20
10.2
3.71E-04

GOTERM_MF_DIRECT
GO:0003677~DNA binding
35
17.8
4.23E-04

GOTERM_MF_DIRECT
GO:0004725~protein tyrosine phosphatase activity
7
3.6
4.62E-04

GOTERM_MF_DIRECT
GO:0046982~protein heterodimerization activity
15
7.6
7.77E-04

GOTERM_MF_DIRECT
GO:0000166~nucleotide binding
35
17.8
9.78E-04

GOTERM_MF_DIRECT
GO:0016791~phosphatase activity
7
3.6
1.29E-03

GOTERM_MF_DIRECT
GO:0019903~protein phosphatase binding
6
3.0
2.02E-03

GOTERM_MF_DIRECT
GO:0005524~ATP binding
28
14.2
2.62E-03

of enriched genes in each term. The top ten terms based on P value were chosen in each category.

Table 3: Pathway enrichment analysis of differentially expressed genes in old mouse ovarian secondary follicles compared to young mouse.

Category
Term
Count
%
P value

Up-regulated

KEGG_PATHWAY
mmu05164:Influenza A
15
8.6
2.25E-11

KEGG_PATHWAY
mmu05168:Herpes simplex infection
15
8.6
3.13E-10

KEGG_PATHWAY
mmu05162:Measles
11
6.3
6.23E-08

KEGG_PATHWAY
mmu05160:Hepatitis C
11
6.3
6.23E-08

KEGG_PATHWAY
mmu04380:Osteoclast differentiation
8
4.6
4.40E-05

KEGG_PATHWAY
mmu05161:Hepatitis B
8
4.6
1.12E-04

KEGG_PATHWAY
mmu04622:RIG-I-like receptor signaling pathway
6
3.4
1.58E-04

KEGG_PATHWAY
mmu04668:TNF signaling pathway
7
4.0
1.69E-04

KEGG_PATHWAY
mmu04620:Toll-like receptor signaling pathway
6
3.4
9.93E-04

KEGG_PATHWAY
mmu05133:Pertussis
5
2.9
2.38E-03

Down-regulated

KEGG_PATHWAY
mmu04151:PI3K-Akt signaling pathway
14
7.1
4.14E-04

KEGG_PATHWAY
mmu05200:Pathways in cancer
14
7.1
1.31E-03

KEGG_PATHWAY
mmu04550:Signaling pathways regulating pluripotency of stem cells
8
4.1
1.69E-03

KEGG_PATHWAY
mmu04520:Adherens junction
6
3.0
2.03E-03

KEGG_PATHWAY
mmu04015:Rap1 signaling pathway
9
4.6
5.33E-03

KEGG_PATHWAY
mmu04390:Hippo signaling pathway
7
3.6
1.16E-02

KEGG_PATHWAY
mmu05145:Toxoplasmosis
6
3.0
1.36E-02

KEGG_PATHWAY
mmu04510:Focal adhesion
8
4.1
1.51E-02

KEGG_PATHWAY
mmu04022:cGMP-PKG signaling pathway
7
3.6
2.04E-02

KEGG_PATHWAY
mmu03040:Spliceosome
6
3.0
2.57E-02

Number of enriched genes in each term. The top ten terms based on P value were chosen in each category.

3.3. Protein-Protein Interaction and Gene Regulation Network Analysis

In total, 187 nodes and 572 edges were mapped in the PPI network of identified differentially expressed genes using STRING with the minimum required interaction score > 0.7 (Figure 3). The 10 nodes with highest degree were regarded as hub genes: STAT1, IFIT1, IFIT3, IRF7, USP18, OASL2, IFIT2, UBC, DDX58, IFIH1. There were 12 modules generated by ClusterONE with p-value < 0.05. The most significant module with p-value < 0.001 contained 35 nodes and 286 edges (Figure 4). The 10 genes listed above apart from UBC were included in the module. In addition to the 9 genes, other nodes in the module were RSAD2, IFI47, TRIM30A, PARP14, PARP9, IFI44, RTP4, GBP7, ISG15, IRF9, GBP6, GBP3, IGTP, HERC6, IRGM1, DHX58, IIGP1, OAS2, DDX60, CXCL10, ZBP1, GBP2, EIF2AK2, IRGM2, IFI35, and TLR3. And all genes in the module were upregulated. As shown in the gene regulatory network modeling for selected genes, many differentially expressed genes such as BRCA1, STAT3, JUN, AKT1, SEPRING1, TCF3, MAP3K7, and IRF7 took part in various pathways (Figure 5).

Figure 3: Protein-protein interaction (PPI) network complex. Using the Search Tool for the retrieval of Interacting Genes (STRING) database online database, 187 out of 371 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) (upregulated genes are displayed in red and downregulated genes in green) were filtered into the DEGs protein-protein interaction (PPI) network complex.

Figure 4: Overlapping protein complexes in the protein interaction. The most significant module consisted of 35 nodes and 286 edges, and all genes in this module were upregulated (in red).

Figure 5: Gene regulatory network modeling for selected differentially expressed genes by using Cytoscape software (version 3.6.1). Gene regulatory network modeling of selected genes such as BRCA1, RPA2, STAT3, JUN, AKT1, STK3, SOX4, TCF3, S100A8, and IFIT2 showed their genetic interactions by various pathways. Circles indicate genes, red color indicates upregulation, and green color indicates downregulation.

4. Discussion

Elucidating the mechanism of ovarian aging has significant meanings to female health. The gradual decrease of both the quantity and the quality of the oocytes surrounded by the granulosa cells in all stages of follicles dominates the reproductive aging [4]. In previous study, Govindaraj et al. revealed that gene expression patterns changed considerably in the rat primordial follicles in the process of ovarian aging [25]. Folliculogenesis in the ovary is a highly dynamic and periodic process regulated by both intra- and extra-oocyte factors [26]. At each reproductive cycle, activated primordial follicles join the growing pool transiting to primary follicles [26]. Through further development, a primary follicle grows into a secondary follicle [26]. And these stages are gonadotropin independent, but depend on the complex bidirectional communication between the oocyte and the somatic cells [26]. In the subsequent stages of folliculogenesis, the presence of pituitary gonadotropins, follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), and luteinizing hormone (LH) are required [26]. So the secondary follicles from the mouse ovaries were selected as research objective in our study.

Gene expression profile of the secondary follicles from the young and old mouse ovaries was compared by microarray analysis to find what changed in the process of ovarian aging in the present study. The results of our research found that 174 genes were upregulated and 197 genes were downregulated in the secondary follicles from the old mouse ovaries compared to those from the young mouse ovaries.

Further GO and KEGG pathway analyses were performed to study the function of the differentially expressed genes. The result of GO analysis showed that the upregulated genes were mainly involved in biological process such as immune system process and defense response, while downregulated genes were closely related to gene transcription and cell apoptosis. However, there was an unexpected phenomenon in the results of our functional enrichment. Many upregulated genes were involved in response to virus and interferon in the biological process and took part in several virus related signal pathway. This phenomenon revealed that the SPF mice used in our study might infect some viruses. However, the certain thing is that the immune related genes can be expressed in ovarian granulosa cells, not only in immune cells. Several earlier studies indicated that viruses can induce innate immune response in granulosa cells and perturb ovarian function in mouse [27, 28]. And immune response genes were overexpressed with increasing age as showed by several microarray studies of aging [29]. Recently the concept that innate immunity is an essential requisite in the ovulation process is forwarded [30]. The important role of innate immune cells in decreasing the senescence burden was also recognized [31]. There was a probability that innate immune related genes were upregulated in the process of aging and affected the progress of ovarian aging. Yet, the actual role of innate immunity in the process of ovarian aging or folliculogenesis needs to be further researched.

We conducted protein-protein interaction network analysis of differentially expressed genes. The nodes regarded as hub genes were mostly involved in innate immune system. As in the gene regulatory network, many differentially expressed genes between young and old mouse ovarian secondary follicles such as BRCA1, STAT3, JUN, AKT1, SEPRING1, TCF3, MAP3K7, and IRF7 showed their genetic interactions by various pathways. Thus, a number of pathways were interacted through many genes in the process of ovarian aging.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, our data showed quite different gene expression patterns of the secondary follicles between young and old mouse ovaries. The differentially expressed genes involved in the process of ovarian aging are central to biological processes such as immune system process, aging, transcription, DNA replication, DNA repair, protein stabilization, and apoptotic process. However, many upregulated genes in the old mouse ovarian secondary follicles were innate immune related genes. We proposed that innate immune system may play a vital role in the process of ovarian aging. Our results of altered genes and related transcriptional networks may be helpful for understanding the mechanism of the folliculogenesis in the process of ovarian aging in mice.

There are however limitations in the present study. Findings of our present research were mainly based on the bioinformatics analysis and further experiments are needed to verify. Furthermore, these data were acquired with secondary follicles from mouse ovaries and needed to be confirmed with the samples from the human.

Data Availability

The results of our microarray data were made available in the public domain NCBI-GEO repository.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this article.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Numbers 81701438, 81300453, and 81370469).

References

J. C. Stevenson, “A woman's journey through the reproductive, transitional and postmenopausal periods of life: Impact on cardiovascular and musculo-skeletal risk and the role of estrogen replacement,” Maturitas, vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 197–205, 2011.

M. L. Traub and N. Santoro, “Reproductive aging and its consequences for general health,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 1204, pp. 179–187, 2010.

E. B. Gold, “The timing of the age at which natural menopause occurs,” Obstetrics & Gynecology Clinics of North America, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 425–440, 2011.

E. R. Te Velde, “The variability of female reproductive ageing,” Human Reproduction Update, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 141–154, 2002.

E. Markström, E. C. Svensson, R. Shao, B. Svanberg, and H. Billig, “Survival factors regulating ovarian apoptosis—dependence on follicle differentiation,” Reproduction, vol. 123, no. 1, pp. 23–30, 2002.

I. Huhtaniemi, O. Hovatta, A. La Marca et al., “Advances in the molecular pathophysiology, genetics, and treatment of primary ovarian insufficiency,” Trends in Endocrinology Metabolism 29, pp. 400–419, 2018.

E. Block, “A quantitative morphological investigation of the follicular system in newborn female infants,” Journal of Acta Anatomica, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 201–206, 1953.

S. J. Richardson, V. Senikas, and J. F. Nelson, “Follicular depletion during the menopausal transition: Evidence for accelerated loss and ultimate exhaustion,” The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, vol. 65, no. 6, pp. 1231–1237, 1987.

M. J. Faddy and R. G. Gosden, “A model conforming the decline in follicle numbers to the age of menopause in women,” Human Reproduction, vol. 11, no. 7, pp. 1484–1486, 1996.

M. J. Faddy, “Follicle dynamics during ovarian ageing,” Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology, vol. 163, no. 1-2, pp. 43–48, 2000.

J. K. Collins and K. T. Jones, “DNA damage responses in mammalian oocytes,” Reproduction, vol. 152, no. 1, pp. R15–R22, 2016.

D. R. Meldrum, R. F. Casper, A. Diez-Juan, C. Simon, A. D. Domar, and R. Frydman, “Aging and the environment affect gamete and embryo potential: can we intervene?” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 105, no. 3, pp. 548–559, 2016.

V. Govindaraj and A. J. Rao, “Ovarian aging: possible molecular mechanisms with special emphasis on DNA repair gene BRCA1,” Womens Health International, vol. 02, no. 01, p. 112, 2016.

V. Govindaraj, R. Keralapura Basavaraju, and A. J. Rao, “Changes in the expression of DNA double strand break repair genes in primordial follicles from immature and aged rats,” Reproductive BioMedicine Online, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 303–310, 2015.

I. Rzepka-Górska, B. Tarnowski, A. Chudecka-Głaz, B. Górski, D. Zielińska, and A. Tołoczko-Grabarek, “Premature menopause in patients with BRCA1 gene mutation,” Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, vol. 100, no. 1, pp. 59–63, 2006.

K. Oktay, J. Y. Kim, D. Barad, and S. N. Babayev, “Association of BRCA1 mutations with occult primary ovarian insufficiency: A possible explanation for the link between infertility and breast/ovarian cancer risks,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 240–244, 2010.

S. Titus, F. Li, R. Stobezki et al., “Impairment of BRCA1-related DNA double-strand break repair leads to ovarian aging in mice and humans,” Science Translational Medicine, vol. 5, no. 172, Article ID 172ra21, 2013.

W. K. Deng, Y. B. Wang, Z. X. Liu, H. Cheng, and Y. Xue, “HemI: a toolkit for illustrating heatmaps,” PLoS ONE, vol. 9, no. 11, Article ID e111988, 2014.

C. Gene Ontology, “Gene ontology consortium: going forward,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. D1049–D1056, 2015.

M. Kanehisa, Y. Sato, M. Kawashima, M. Furumichi, and M. Tanabe, “KEGG as a reference resource for gene and protein annotation,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. D457–D462, 2016.

D. W. Huang, B. T. Sherman, Q. Tan et al., “DAVID Bioinformatics Resources: expanded annotation database and novel algorithms to better extract biology from large gene lists,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 35, supplement 2, pp. W169–W175, 2007.

D. Szklarczyk, J. H. Morris, H. Cook et al., “The STRING database in 2017: quality-controlled protein-protein association networks, made broadly accessible,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. D362–D368, 2017.

G. Su, J. H. Morris, B. Demchak, and G. D. Bader, “Biological network exploration with cytoscape 3,” Current Protocols in Bioinformatics, vol. 47, pp. 8.13.1–8.13.24, 2014.

T. Nepusz, H. Yu, and A. Paccanaro, “Detecting overlapping protein complexes in protein-protein interaction networks,” Nature Methods, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 471-472, 2012.

V. Govindaraj, H. Krishnagiri, P. Chakraborty, M. Vasudevan, and A. J. Rao, “Age-related changes in gene expression patterns of immature and aged rat primordial follicles,” Systems Biology in Reproductive Medicine, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 37–48, 2017.

N. Rimon-Dahari, L. Yerushalmi-Heinemann, L. Alyagor, and N. Dekel, “Ovarian folliculogenesis,” Results and Problems in Cell Differentiation, vol. 58, pp. 167–190, 2016.

K. Yan, D. Feng, J. Liang et al., “Cytosolic DNA sensor-initiated innate immune responses in mouse ovarian granulosa cells,” Reproduction, vol. 153, no. 6, pp. 821–834, 2017.

Q. Wang, H. Wu, L. Cheng et al., “Mumps virus induces innate immune responses in mouse ovarian granulosa cells through the activation of Toll-like receptor 2 and retinoic acid-inducible gene I,” Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology, vol. 436, pp. 183–194, 2016.

J. P. de Magalhães, J. Curado, and G. M. Church, “Meta-analysis of age-related gene expression profiles identifies common signatures of aging,” Bioinformatics, vol. 25, no. 7, pp. 875–881, 2009.

K. Spanel-Borowski, “Ovulation as danger signaling event of innate immunity,” Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology, vol. 333, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2011.

C. von Kobbe, “Cellular senescence: a view throughout organismal life,” Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, vol. 75, no. 19, pp. 3553–3567, 2018.