BioMed Research International
Volume 2020 (2020), Article ID 2098325, 10 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/2098325

Research Article

Bone Metastases Pattern in Newly Diagnosed Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Real-World Analysis in the SEER Database

Xiaojing Yang,¹ Hanru Ren,² Weiwei Yu,¹ Hongling Li,¹ Xinmiao Yang,¹ and Jie Fu¹

¹Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated with Sixth People’s Hospital, No. 600, Yishan Road, Shanghai 200233, China
²Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai Pudong Hospital, Fudan University, Pudong Medical Center, Shanghai 201300, China

Correspondence should be addressed to Jie Fu; fujie74@sjtu.edu.cn

Received 7 March 2020; Revised 14 June 2020; Accepted 24 June 2020; Published 17 July 2020

Academic Editor: Jiang Du

Copyright © 2020 Xiaojing Yang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

Objective. To evaluate the prevalence rate and survival situation of bone metastases in initial nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients and the hazard and forecast elements of bone metastases NPC patients. Patients and Methods. The data collected from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program between 2010 and 2016 were evaluated. Univariate and multivariable logistic analysis and the Cox regression were carried out to estimate predictors and elements of the being of bone metastases at diagnosis, respectively. The overall survival of different subgroups were appraised by log-rank tests and the Kaplan–Meier analysis. Results. Factors including male sex, higher N stage, presence of liver, and brain or lung metastases were largely related to the occurrence of bone metastases. The median survival time for bone metastasis NPC patients was 14.0 months. A factor of more than one primary sequence number predicted worse survival. Conclusion. The data offer corresponding risks and prognostic indicators of bone metastases for NPC patients.

1. Introduction

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is a rare malignant tumor with a high geographic risk and a serious risk of distant metastasis. The annual incidence rate of NPC is between 0.15% and 0.5% in Southeast Asia [1]. Although early NPC can be cured, patients are usually in advanced stage at the time of initial diagnosis. It has been reported that about 15% of patients with NPC have distant metastases at the time of initial diagnosis [2]. The TNM staging is a well-accepted standard for predicting the prognosis of NPC. However, for the patients who have distant metastasis at the time of initial diagnosis, more accurate prognostic indicators are in highly demand.

Bone is one of the most common sites of distant metastases in NPC patients [3]. Bone metastases could bring about pathological fractures and pain, which reduce the life quality of patients [4]. It is reported that the prevalence of bone metastases in NPC is 54%-80% [5]. The survival time of patients with NPC who have distant metastases at initial diagnosis varies greatly [6, 7]. Early detection and treatment can prevent bone-related complications such as fractures and relieve the symptoms and prognosis of patients [5]. At present, there is no clear screening guide for testing bone metastases in NPC patients. Early identification of risk factors for bone metastases allows thorough examination of high-risk patients with bone metastases. These patients could obtain in-time treatment at an early stage. Several previous research displayed the prognostic indicators for NPC patients with bone metastases in China [3, 5, 8, 9]. They reported that NPC patients with bone metastases who are of higher age, of higher N stage, of high serum lactic dehydrogenase levels, with anemia, with multiple bone metastases sites, and without radiotherapy had worse survival. Due to the ethnic and geographical differences in NPC patients, it would be more evident to explore the relevant data in Western countries.

The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program of the National Cancer Institute was established in 1973 and offers a significant data source for epidemiological analysis [10]. With the application of the SEER database, this research was designed to define the prevalence and risk elements of bone metastases in the initial diagnosis of NPC patients in areas out of Asian, such as the United States, and to define the risk factors and overall survival (OS) for these patients.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Ethical Considerations and Data Availability Statement

The patient consent was not required to use the data in SEER database. Our research is in line with the Helsinki Declaration and related ethics. Demographic and tumor data can be obtained directly from the SEER database.

2.2. Cohort Definition

The patient data from 2010 to 2016 were acquired from the SEER database. The SEER Stat software (Version 8.3.5, http://seer.cancer.gov/seerstat/download) was used to define inclusion criteria of NPC patients: (1) with a clear pathological diagnosis; (2) diagnosed from 2010 to 2016; (3) the stage of TNM of the patients follows the seventh edition of AJCC; and (4) the survival time is clear. Excluding cases with only autopsy or death certificates, invalid follow-up, and unknown bone metastases and NPC cases with bone metastases were eventually obtained. The detailed flow chart is shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1: Flowchart of patient inclusion in this cohort study.

2.3. Parameters

The demographic data included age (0-24, 25-49, 50-74, and ≥75 years), gender (male, female), race ((white, black, and others (American Indian/Alaska Native or Asian/Pacific Islander)), insurance status (insured, uninsured, or unknown), and marital status (married, single, or unknown). The clinical properties incorporated T stage (T0, T1, T2, T3, T4, and unknown) and N stage (N0, N1, N2, N3, and unknown), organ metastases including liver (none, yes, and unknown), lung (none, yes, and unknown), and brain (none, yes, and unknown), and sequence number (one primary only, others). And the data also included the survival status and time of each patient.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

Risk factors of newly diagnosed NPC patients with bone metastases were primarily determined by univariate logistic regression. If the results turned out statistically significant (), then the multivariate logistic regression was used for further analysis. The OS was defined as the time from the diagnosis to death, which is the main result of survival analysis. Differences in survival were dissected by the Kaplan–Meier analysis and log-rank test. A multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression was performed by analyzing the above factors. The statistical analysis was performed by SPSS 23.0 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY). was known as statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Demographic and Clinical Characteristics

In the duration of 2010 and 2016, 3,772 NPC patients in the SEER database met our screening criteria (Figure 1). 4.1% of these people were younger than 25 years old. 22.1% of patients were between the ages of 25 and 49. A large percent referring 58.2% of the patients were between 50 and 74 years old, and 10.3% were older than 75 years. The ratio of women to men is about 1 : 2.4. For the ethnic information, 47.7% are white, and 12.1% are black. The remaining 40.2% are American Indian/AK Aboriginal and Asian/Pacific Islander. Most of them are married (56.2%) and insured (62.9%). As for the TNM stage, the T1 and N1 stages accounted for 27.5% and 27.0%, respectively. On the other hand, the patients presented liver, brain, or lung metastases accounting for 7%, 1.0%, and 4.2%, respectively. 83.7% of the patients had one major serial number. Demographic and clinical data details are displayed in Table 1.

Table 1: Univariate and multivariable logistic regression for analyzing the demographic and related clinical characteristics for developing bone metastases in patients diagnosed with initial NPC (diagnosed 2010–2016).

Subject characteristics
No. of NPC patients
Univariable
Multivariable

Without bone met (, %)
With bone met (, %)
OR (95% CI)

OR (95% CI)

Age

    0-24
142 (92.8)
11 (7.2)
1 (reference)
1.0
1 (reference)
1.0

    25-49
757 (90.8)
77 (9.2)
1.031 (0.535-1.988)
0.972
1.295 (0.528-2.881)
0.527

    50-74
2066 (94.1)
129 (5.0)
0.800 (0.423-1.516)
0.494
0.978 (0.447-2.140)
0.956

    75+
372 (95.4)
18 (4.6)
0.620 (0.286-1.346)
0.227
0.813 (0.314-2.103)
0.667

Gender

    Female
1063 (95.9)
46 (4.1)
1 (reference)
1.0
1 (reference)
1.0

    Male
2474 (92.9)
189 (7.1)
1.765 (1.269-2.456)
0.001
1.676 (1.134-2.478)
0.010

Race

    White
1703 (94.7)
96 (5.3)
1 (reference)
1.0
1 (reference)
1.0

    Black
425 (93.0)
32 (7.0)
1.336 (0.883-2.021)
0.171
0.893 (0.537-1.483)
0.662

    Others
1409 (92.9)
107 (7.1)
1.347 (1.014-1.790)
0.040
1.003 (0.711-1.415)
0.985

Marital status

    Married
1996 (94.1)
125 (5.9)
1 (reference)
1.0
1 (reference)
1.0

    Single
1321 (93.2)
96 (6.8)
1.160 (0.882-1.528)
0.298
0.946 (0.664-1.348)
0.759

    Unknown
220 (94.0)
14 (6.0)
NA
NA
NA
NA

Insurance status

    Insured
2249 (94.7)
125 (5.3)
1 (reference)
1.0
1 (reference)
1.0

    Uninsured
1142 (92.4)
94 (7.6)
1.481 (1.123-1.953)
0.005
1.256 (0.903-1.746)
0.176

    Unknown
146 (90.1)
16 (9.9)
NA
NA
NA
NA

T stage

    T0
19 (86.4)
3 (13.6)
1 (reference)
1.0
1 (reference)
1.0

    T1
1001 (96.3)
38 (3.7)
0.240 (0.068-0.848)
0.027
0.455 (0.096-2.149)
0.320

    T2
525 (96.0)
22 (4.0)
0.265 (0.073-0.964)
0.044
0.457 (0.094-2.229)
0.333

    T3
594 (94.3)
36 (5.7)
0.384 (0.109-1.358)
0.137
0.632 (0.133-3.018)
0.566

    T4
715 (91.1)
70 (8.9)
0.620 (0.179-2.147)
0.451
0.917 (0.197-4.266)
0.911

    Unknown
683 (91.2)
66 (8.8)
NA
NA
NA
NA

N stage

    N0
797 (96.6)
28 (3.4)
1 (reference)
1.0
1 (reference)
1.0

    N1
970 (95.1)
50 (4.9)
1.467 (0.915-2.352)
0.111
1.086 (0.630-1.873)
0.767

    N2
766 (93.1)
57 (6.9)
2.118 (1.333-3.366)
0.001
1.844 (1.085-3.136)
0.024

    N3
405 (89.0)
50 (11.0)
3.514 (2.179-5.667)
<0.05
2.052 (1.166-3.611)
0.013

    Unknown
599 (92.3)
50 (7.7)
NA
NA
NA
NA

Liver Met

    None
3488 (95.8)
152 (4.2)
1 (reference)
1.0
1 (reference)
1.0

    Yes
48 (37.8)
79 (62.2)
37.768 (25.457-55.991)
<0.05
23.742 (15.261-36.938)
<0.05

    Unknown
1 (20.0)
4 (80.0)
NA
NA
NA
NA

Brain Met

    None
3519 (94.4)
209 (5.6)
1 (reference)
1.0
1 (reference)
1.0

    Yes
18 (47.4)
20 (52.6)
18.708 (9.748-35.904)
<0.05
10.372 (4.505-23.676)
<0.05

    Unknown
0 (0.0)
6 (100.0)
NA
NA
NA
NA

Lung Met

    None
3431 (95.3)
171 (4.7)
1 (reference)
1.0
1 (reference)
1.0

    Yes
99 (62.3)
59 (37.3)
11.958 (8.367-17.089)
<0.05
6.027 (3.835-9.473)
<0.05

    Unknown
7 (58.3)
5 (41.7)
NA
NA
NA
NA

Sequence number

    One primary only
2946 (93.3)
212 (6.7)
1 (reference)
1.0
1 (reference)
1.0

    Others
591 (96.3)
23 (3.7)
1.849 (1.192-2.869)
0.006
1.298 (0.777-2.167)
0.319

All factors with unknown data were removed from the Cox and Kaplan–Meier model. NPC: nasopharyngeal carcinoma; IQR: interquartile range; Met: metastases; NA: not available.

3.2. Prevalence of Bone Metastases

In the entire cohort study, the prevalence of bone metastases with the initial diagnosis of NPC was 6.2% (235/3,772) (Figure 1). An average follow-up time was 14.9 months for all 235 patients with bone metastases.

3.3. Risk Factors for Spreading Bone Metastases

Univariate analysis showed that different factors were significantly associated with the prevalence of bone metastases. Patients that were male (, 95% CI: 1.269-2.456, ), uninsured (, 95% CI: 1.123-1.953, ), and had liver, brain, and lung metastases (, 95% CI: 25.457-55.991, ; , 95% CI: 9.748-35.904, ; and , 95% CI: 8.367-17.089, ), and not only one primary sequence number (, 95% CI: 1.192-2.869, ) were more likely to have bone metastases. Multivariate logistic regression analyses that showed male, presence of liver, and brain or lung metastases at initial diagnosis were positively related to bone metastases (Table 1).

3.4. Survival Analysis and Prognostic Factors for Bone Metastases

At the end of follow-up, 67.2% () of NPC patients who had bone metastases at the time of initial diagnosis died. According to our univariate analysis model, the median OS for these NPC patients was 14.0 months (95% CI: 11.478-16.522 months, Figure 2(a)). Older age (Figure 2(b)), insurance status (Figure 2(f)), and more than one primary sequence number (Figure 2(l)) were negatively correlated with OS. On the other hand, gender (Figure 2(c)), race (Figure 2(d)), marital status (Figure 2(e)), liver, brain, and lung metastases (Figure 2(g)–2(i)), and TNM stage (Figure 2(j) and 2(k)) showed no significant relationship with prognosis.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

(g)

(h)

(i)

(j)

(k)

(l)

Figure 2: The Kaplan–Meier analysis of overall survival among patients diagnosed with nasopharyngeal carcinoma with initial bone metastases ((a), overall), stratified by age (b), gender (c), race (d), marital status (e), insurance status (f), liver metastases (g), brain metastases (h), lung metastases (i), T stage (j), N stage (k), and sequence number (l).

By using the multivariate Cox regression, the patients only with primary NPC (, 95% CI: 1.061-3.287, ) had better OS than the other groups of which the median survival time was 15 months, while the other group was 7 months (Table 2).

Table 2: Multivariable Cox regression for analyzing the prognosis factors for primary NPC with bone metastases.

Subject characteristics
No. of NPC patients with bone metastases
Survival, median (IQR), mo
HR (95% CI)

Overall
Dead (, %)

Age

    0-24
11
6 (54.5)
24 (7.903-40.097)
1 (reference)
1.0

    25-49
77
47 (61.0)
18 (14.907-21.093)
1.298 (0.501-3.361)
0.591

    50-74
129
90 (69.8)
13 (9.617-16.383)
2.095 (0.805-5.448)
0.129

    75+
18
15 (83.3)
7 (3.425-10.575)
3.896 (1.291-11.754)
0.016

Gender

    Female
46
30 (65.2)
19 (10.596-27.404)
1 (reference)
1.0

    Male
189
128 (67.7)
13 (10.739-15.261)
1.386 (0.885-2.171)
0.153

Race

    White
96
64 (66.7)
13 (7.163-18.837)
1 (reference)
1.0

    Black
32
22 (68.8)
13 (9.317-16.683)
1.260 (0.723-2.195)
0.415

    Others
107
72 (67.3)
15 (11.383-18.617)
1.177 (0.805-1.723)
0.400

Marital status

    Married
125
85 (68.0)
14 (9.798-18.202)
1 (reference)
1.0

    Unmarried
96
62 (64.6)
16 (12.550-19.450)
0.924 (0.644-1.326)
0.668

    Unknown
14
11 (78.6)
NA
NA
NA

Insurance status

    Insured
125
78 (62.4)
17 (13.007-20.993)
1 (reference)
1.0

    Uninsured
94
67 (71.3)
13 (9.003-16.997)
1.338 (0.934-1.915)
0.112

    Unknown
16
13 (81.3)
NA
NA
NA

T stage

    T0
3
3 (100)
12 (0.000-24.803)
1 (reference)
1.0

    T1
38
27 (71.1)
16 (11.842-20.158)
0.475 (0.130-1.727)
0.258

    T2
22
14 (63.6)
20 (9.457-30.543)
0.329 (0.084-1.286)
0.110

    T3
36
28 (77.8)
15 (10.623-19.377)
0.567 (0.154-2.085)
0.392

    T4
69
55 (79.7)
8 (5.829-10.171)
0.699 (0.194-2.518)
0.584

    Unknown
66
30 (45.5)
NA
NA
NA

N stage

    N0
28
22 (78.6)
12 (0.332-23.668)
1 (reference)
1.0

    N1
50
39 (78.0)
13 (9.850-16.150)
1.093 (0.603-1.980)
0.769

    N2
57
42 (73.7)
17 (13.379-20.621)
0.919 (0.543-1.555)
0.754

    N3
50
39 (78.0)
13 (6.447-19.553)
1.208 (0.669-2.179)
0.531

    Unknown
50
16 (32.0)
NA
NA
NA

Liver Met

    None
152
91 (59.9)
15 (12.02-17.980)
1 (reference)
1.0

    Yes
79
64 (81.0)
13 (9.811-16.189)
1.375 (0.947-1.995)
0.094

    Unknown
4
3 (75.0)
NA
NA
NA

Brain Met

    None
209
138 (66.0)
15 (12.429-17.571)
1 (reference)
1.0

    Yes
20
15 (75.0)
5 (0.772-9.228)
1.399 (0.771-2.540)
0.270

    Unknown
6
5 (83.3)
NA
NA
NA

Lung Met

    None
171
110 (64.3)
15 (12.048-17.952)
1 (reference)
1.0

    Yes
59
45 (76.3)
13 (6.425-19.575)
1.361 (0.920-2.014)
0.123

    Unknown
5
3 (60.0)
NA
NA
NA

Sequence number

    One primary only
212
138 (65.1)
15 (12.305-17.695)
1 (reference)
1.0

    Others
23
20 (87.0)
7 (0.000-15.307)
1.868 (1.061-3.287)
0.030

All factors with unknown data were removed from the Cox and Kaplan–Meier model. NPC: nasopharyngeal carcinoma; IQR: interquartile range; mo: months; Met: metastases; Surg: surgical treatments; NA: not available.

4. Discussion

At the moment, this research is the largest scale of analysis on bone metastases in NPC in the United States. The SEER database was carried out to analyze the prevalence and survival rate of the newly diagnosed bone metastasis in NPC in the United States between 2010 and 2016.

According to the reports, compared with breast cancer, lung cancer, and prostate cancer, the prevalence of bone metastasis in patients with NPC is relatively low [10–12]. This study showed that 6.2% of NPC patients had bone metastases at the initial diagnosis, consistent with the study conducted by Yang et al. (7.7%) [13] while other studies reported the opposite results [14, 15]. This could have partly resulted from various detection methods used to detect the rate of bone metastases in NPC patients [14, 16]. However, the method used to identify bone metastases in these bone metastasis NPC patients in the SEER database was hard to define. Only a few studies on risk factors for bone metastasis in patients with NPC were reported in the United States. On the other hand, the related studies were reported in China, one of which showed that sex, C-reactive protein, neutrophils, platelets, hemoglobin, and other factors were notably related to the progress of bone metastases [13]. In addition, in this study, the number/location of lymph node metastases was also related to the development of bone metastases. These indicators could provide clinical value for NPC patients to predict a high risk of developing bone metastases. For these NPC patients in high risk, the bone should be further examined to check bone metastases.

In addition, identifying prognostic factors related to bone metastases in NPC can help the physicians with providing personalized treatment strategies for different patients. It also improves the quality of life and promotes a good prognosis for the patients. Our research demonstrated for the first time that the sequence number is related to OS in bone metastasis NPC patients. Among the NPC patients with bone metastases at the initial diagnosis, the prognosis of patients with only one mass at the primary diseased site was better than that of patients with multiple masses, as a result of the activity of tumor cells. Multiple masses at the primary site imply that the tumor cells are active and more prone to metastasize, which bring a poor prognosis for patients. Previous studies of patients with NPC in the SEER database showed that the race [17, 18], marital status [19], and age [20, 21] were associated with the prognosis of the patients. However, this is based on patients who have not had distant metastases. In addition, this study showed that the above factors have no significant relationship with patient prognosis. This could have resulted from multiple reasons. In the first place, NPC is not a common tumor in the United States as 70% of new NPC occur in East and Southeast Asia each year [22], and the number of cases collected in this study is not enough. As a result, the stratified analysis of the relationship between different races and prognosis in patients with bone metastases of NPC may bring bias to the study. Moreover, for patients who have had a distant metastasis, marital status may have little effect on their treatment and prognosis. This could be illustrated in that the OS of these advanced patients was short and no long-term relationship was observed. Besides, regarding to the age in this study, it was refined into four stages, and the results turned out that patients older than 75 years have a significantly worse prognosis. This is consistent with the research of Huang et al. [21], which showed that senior age is a risk factor for poor prognosis. Further investigations are required with a large number of patients admitted in the study.

There were also limitations in this research. This is a retrospective analysis that may bring bias to the results. Meanwhile, NPC has a low prevalence in the United States, and the sample size is not large enough. Besides, the detection methods for bone metastasis in these cases are not included so that the differences between multiple methods are required to be detected. In addition, it would be better to combine the data in the SEER database with the data of NPC patients in East and Southeast Asia, which would give more comprehensive information to analyze the global NPC patients.

5. Conclusion

To conclude, in newly diagnosed NPC patients, the prevalence of bone metastases is close to 6.2%. Bone metastases could reduce the survival rate of NPC patients. Especially at the time of initial diagnosis, further detection of the bone should be considered as a routine examination of male NPC patients. Our data identify a series of risk and prognostic factors for NPC patients with bone metastases and provide proof to realize early detection of bone metastases. This would be beneficial to the clinicians to choose the appropriate treatment with better patient survival.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The author reports no conflicts of interest in this work.

Authors’ Contributions

Xiaojing Yang, Hanru Ren, Weiwei Yu, Hongling Li, and Xinmiao Yang conceived and designed the study. Xiaojing Yang and Hanru Ren wrote the manuscript. Xiaojing Yang and Jie Fu reviewed and edited the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the manuscript. Xiaojing Yang and Hanru Ren contributed equally to this work.

Acknowledgments

Xiaojing Yang is the recipient of a grant from Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated with Sixth People’s Hospital (contract grant number: ynlc201807) and a grant from the Shanghai Municipal Health Commission (20184Y0229).

References

J. T. S. Wee, T. C. Ha, S. L. E. Loong, and C. N. Qian, “Is nasopharyngeal cancer really a "Cantonese cancer"?” Chinese Journal of Cancer, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 517–526, 2010.

L. Q. Tang, Q. Y. Chen, W. Fan et al., “Prospective study of tailoring whole-body dual-modality [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography with plasma Epstein-Barr virus DNA for detecting distant metastasis in endemic nasopharyngeal carcinoma at initial staging,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 31, no. 23, pp. 2861–2869, 2013.

T. Lu, Q. Guo, X. Cui et al., “Prognostic evaluation of nasopharyngeal carcinoma with bone-only metastasis after therapy,” Yonsei Medical Journal, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 840–845, 2016.

Y. Zhang, X. Guo, G. Wang et al., “Real-world study of the prevalence, risk factors, and prognostic factors associated with bone metastases in women with uterine cervical cancer using surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) data analysis,” Medical Science Monitor, vol. 24, pp. 6387–6397, 2018.

X. S. Sun, Y. J. Liang, S. L. Liu et al., “Subdivision of nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients with bone-only metastasis at diagnosis for prediction of survival and treatment guidance,” Cancer Research and Treatment, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 1259–1268, 2019.

M. Y. Chen, R. Jiang, L. Guo et al., “Locoregional radiotherapy in patients with distant metastases of nasopharyngeal carcinoma at diagnosis,” Chinese Journal of Cancer, vol. 32, no. 11, pp. 604–613, 2013.

L. Shen, J. Dong, S. Li et al., “M1 stage subdivision and treatment outcome of patients with bone-only metastasis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma,” The Oncologist, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 291–298, 2015.

C. Chen, J. B. Wu, H. Jiang et al., “A prognostic score for nasopharyngeal carcinoma with bone metastasis: development and validation from multicenter,” Journal of Cancer, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 797–806, 2018.

S. He, Y. Wang, H. Peng et al., “Pretreatment alkaline phosphatase and Epstein-Barr virus DNA predict poor prognosis and response to salvage radiotherapy in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma and metachronous bone-only metastasis,” Journal of Cancer, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 417–424, 2017.

Z. Xiong, G. Deng, X. Huang et al., “Bone metastasis pattern in initial metastatic breast cancer: a population-based study,” Cancer Management and Research, vol. Volume 10, pp. 287–295, 2018.

M. B. dos Reis Oliveira, F. C. de Queiroz Mello, and M. E. M. Paschoal, “The relationship between lung cancer histology and the clinicopathological characteristics of bone metastases,” Lung Cancer, vol. 96, pp. 19–24, 2016.

X. Guo, C. Zhang, Q. Guo et al., “The homogeneous and heterogeneous risk factors for the morbidity and prognosis of bone metastasis in patients with prostate cancer,” Cancer Management and Research, vol. Volume 10, pp. 1639–1646, 2018.

L. Yang, L. Xia, Y. Wang et al., “Development and external validation of nomograms to predict the risk of skeletal metastasis at the time of diagnosis and skeletal metastasis-free survival in nasopharyngeal carcinoma,” BMC Cancer, vol. 17, no. 1, p. 628, 2017.

F. Y. Liu, J. T. Chang, H. M. Wang et al., “[18F] fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography is more sensitive than skeletal scintigraphy for detecting bone metastasis in endemic nasopharyngeal carcinoma at initial staging,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 599–604, 2006.

C. C. Pan, J. Lu, P. Chen et al., “Evaluation of the prognostic significance of refinement and stratification of distant metastasis status in 1016 cases of nasopharyngeal carcinoma,” Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi, vol. 35, no. 8, pp. 595–599, 2013.

S. H. Ng, S. C. Chan, T. C. Yen et al., “Staging of untreated nasopharyngeal carcinoma with PET/CT: comparison with conventional imaging work-up,” European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 12–22, 2009.

S. D. Challapalli, M. C. Simpson, E. Adjei Boakye et al., “Survival differences in nasopharyngeal carcinoma among racial and ethnic minority groups in the United States: a retrospective cohort study,” Clinical Otolaryngology, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 14–20, 2019.

V. J. Patel, N. W. Chen, and V. A. Resto, “Racial and ethnic disparities in nasopharyngeal cancer survival in the United States,” Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, vol. 156, no. 1, pp. 122–131, 2017.

S. G. Wu, Q. H. Zhang, W. W. Zhang, J. Y. Sun, Q. Lin, and Z. Y. He, “The effect of marital status on nasopharyngeal carcinoma survival: a surveillance, epidemiology and end results study,” Journal of Cancer, vol. 9, no. 10, pp. 1870–1876, 2018.

I. Sultan, M. Casanova, A. Ferrari, R. Rihani, and C. Rodriguez-Galindo, “Differential features of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in children and adults: a SEER study,” Pediatric Blood & Cancer, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 279–284, 2010.

S. J. Huang, Y. Y. Tang, H. M. Liu et al., “Impact of age on survival of locoregional nasopharyngeal carcinoma: an analysis of the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results program database, 2004-2013,” Clinical Otolaryngology, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 1209–1218, 2018.

F. Bray, J. Ferlay, I. Soerjomataram, R. L. Siegel, L. A. Torre, and A. Jemal, “Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of prevalence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries,” CA: a Cancer Journal for Clinicians, vol. 68, no. 6, pp. 394–424, 2018.