BioMed Research International
Volume 2020 (2020), Article ID 6407456, 2 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/6407456

Corrigendum

Corrigendum to “The Effect of Cochlear Size on Cochlear Implantation Outcomes”

Jafri Kuthubutheen,¹ Amandeep Grewal,2,3 Sean Symons,2,3 Julian Nedzelski,2,3 David Shipp,2,3 Vincent Lin,2,3 and Joseph Chen2,3

¹School of Surgery, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
²Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada M4N 3M5
³University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada M5S 1A1

Correspondence should be addressed to Jafri Kuthubutheen; jafri.kuth@gmail.com

Received 7 July 2020; Accepted 8 July 2020; Published 5 October 2020

Copyright © 2020 Jafri Kuthubutheen et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

In the article titled “The Effect of Cochlear Size on Cochlear Implantation Outcomes” [1], there was an error in Table 3, where there results following “Outer wall length to 360 degrees” and “Outer wall length to 720 degrees” were inverted. There was also a typo “-vaue” which should have read “-value”. The corrected table is shown below and is listed as Table 1.

Table 1: Cochlear metrics for all subjects. There is no statistically significant difference in all measurements between subjects receiving either electrode.

Minimum (mm)
Maximum (mm)
Mean (mm)
Standard deviation (mm)

-value
Flex 31
8.1
9.8
8.94
1.63

Flex 28
8.1
9.5
8.87
0.38

Combined

8.91
0.37

Outer wall length to 720 degrees
Flex 31
29.8
35.9
32.52
1.41

Flex 28
27.8
34.7
31.91
1.63

Combined

32.29
1.51

Outer wall length to 360 degrees
Flex 31
19.6
23.5
21.4
0.94

Flex 28
18.3
22.6
21.1
1.09

Combined

21.3
1

References

J. Kuthubutheen, A. Grewal, S. Symons et al., “The effect of cochlear size on cochlear implantation outcomes,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2019, Article ID 5849871, 8 pages, 2019.