Retracted: A Retrospective Study on the Efficacy of Two Different Rehabilitation Interventions on KOA: Shock Wave Therapy vs. Electroacupuncture Therapy

[This retracts the article DOI: 10.1155/2021/2099653.].


Background and Aim
Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is a common chronic disease of osteoarthritis, with a relatively high incidence in the elderly.KOA can cause severe systemic physical symptoms such as joint pain, swelling, stiffness, and restricted mobility [1].The number of patients with KOA worldwide is currently estimated to be as high as 350 million [2].The prevalence of knee osteoarthritis is 8.1% in China [3].KOA has become a serious public health problem that seriously affects the life and health of middle-aged and elderly people.Therefore, effective treatment of KOA has become a hot and difficult issue.Traditional Chinese acupuncture has a long history in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis.It has significant effects in relieving patients' pain and improving clinical symptoms, and even in repairing degenerative knee joints with simple, convenient, and easy operation [4][5][6].Electroacupuncture (EA) is a form of acupuncture therapy that combines traditional acupuncture with electrical stimulation, which is famous for quantification and repeatability.Previous studies have confirmed the good therapeutic effect of electroacupuncture on KOA.The specific mechanisms include anti-inflammatory, improving blood circulation, and analgesia [7,8].In clinical biological research, Gang et al. [9].found that electroacupuncture can improve the muscle tone of the rectus femoris in KOA patients, and Han and Sun [10] found that electroacupuncture can also improve the gait function of KOA patients.Traditional Chinese medicine can restore the mechanical balance of the knee joint to achieve a therapeutic effect by treating tendons or treating both muscles and bones at the same time.In addition to the

R E T R A C T E D
direct improvement of muscle function, electroacupuncture also has a complex central analgesic mechanism.At the same time, electroacupuncture not only plays a direct role in improving muscle function but also has a complex central analgesic mechanism [11], which may play a direct antiinflammatory effect on articular cartilage, resulting to treating pain and alleviating the degradation of KOA cartilage finally [12].It has been proved that electroacupuncture can improve the atrophy of the rectus femoris and biceps femoris in KOA rabbit models.In addition, electroacupuncture had a protective effect on the articular cartilage of the rabbit KOA model.In recent years, some new methods of noninvasive treatment, such as extracorporeal shock wave, have emerged.Some studies have shown that the mechanism of pain improvement is that shock wave can incapacitate sensory unmyelinated fibers and reduce the expression of nociceptors on neurocutaneous calcitonin gene-related multiskin, thus reducing the pain sensitivity of patients [13].When the shock wave acts on the local area, it causes minor trauma to the affected area, thus improving the blood supply to the local microcirculation.The levels of interleukin-1, tumor necrosis factor a, and nitric oxide in cartilage were decreased, while the subchondral bone mineral density was increased after extracorporeal shock wave intervention, which were proved that extracorporeal shock wave was beneficial in reducing cartilage inflammation and enhancing subchondral bone strength.The purpose of this study was to analyze the clinical efficacy, adverse reactions, and safety of rehabilitation therapy (shock wave therapy) and alternative medicine (traditional Chinese acupuncture electroacupuncture) in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis.This study provided a new idea of integrated rehabilitation medicine for the clinical treatment of knee osteoarthritis.

Method
2.1.Subjects.This study retrospectively selected patients with knee osteoarthritis in the outpatient clinic from January 1, 2018, to December 30, 2020, and followed the necessary inclusion and exclusion criteria.Each participant signed an informed consent form before participation.This study approved by the Ethics Committee of the Central Hospital of Longhua District was conducted by the Central Hospital of Longhua District, Shenzhen.
Diagnostic criteria: defined the criteria for the diagnosis of knee osteoarthritis in 1995 by the American College of Rheumatology [14].
Inclusion criteria: (a) according to the Chinese "Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Osteoarthritis," the research subjects who can be clearly diagnosed as knee osteoarthritis; (b) the patients are all over 18 years old; (c) no other treatments have been used for the treatment of osteoarthritis in the past month; (d) informed consent was signed by the recruited patient.
Exclusion criteria: (a) patients with other serious bone and joint diseases, or diseases with similar clinical symptoms; (b) patients who have not signed the informed consent.
The included knee osteoarthritis patients were divided into the shock wave group (n = 54), electroacupuncture group (n = 41), and control group (n = 33) based on different treatments.In this study, the percentage of females is 47.1% and males 52.9% in the control group (mean age 55:84 ± 5:62 years; mean course of disease 4:35 ± 1:23 years); the percentage of females is 51.2% and males 48.8% in the electroacupuncture group (mean age 56:32 ± 5:78 years; mean course of disease 4:82 ± 1:57 years); the percentage of females is 48.1% and males 51.9% in the shock wave group (mean age 55:31 ± 5:54 years; mean course of disease 4:59 ± 1:49 years).The difference in basic population specificity was not statistically significant among the three groups.Please see Table 1.

Intervention.
Each patient with knee osteoarthritis was treated for four weeks.
(1) Shockwave group: shockwave treatment was performed on the basis of Voltaren topical treatment, once every 7 days, the frequency was

R E T R A C T E D
higher the score, the more severe the knee osteoarthritis pain.See Table 2 for details.

Statistical Analysis.
Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software 22.0.Quantitative data such as age (years), course of disease (years), osteoarthritis index score, and NRS were all described by statistics.Age, course of disease, osteoarthritis index score NRS, and WHOQOL-BREF score were statistically analyzed by one-way ANOVA LSD (satisfying the effect of homogeneity of variance) and T3 test (not satisfying the effect of homogeneity of variance).Differences were tested using pairwise q-tests.Repeated measurement analysis of variance is used to evaluate the trend of osteoarthritis index score and NRS score with the time of TCM treatment.P < 0:05 was considered as statistically significant.

Osteoarthritis Index Score Analysis before and after
Treatment.The knee osteoarthritis patients in the control group, the electroacupuncture group, and the shock wave group were scored on the osteoarthritis index before treatment, after 2 weeks of treatment, and after 4 weeks of treatment.There were no statistically significant differences in the total scores of pain and stiffness, daily activities, and osteoarthritis index scores before treatment.After 2 weeks of treatment and 4 weeks of treatment, the total scores of pain, stiffness, daily activities, and osteoarthritis index scores of knee osteoarthritis patients in the electroacupuncture group and shock wave group decreased compared with the control group, and they were statistically significant (P value < 0.05).
Repeated measures of variance were used to analyze the trend of changes in the osteoarthritis index scores of each group before treatment, 2 weeks after treatment, and 4 weeks after treatment.The results showed that the score showed a gradual downward trend over time, and it was statistically significant (P < 0:05).There was no statistically significant difference between the electroacupuncture group and the shock wave group.See Table 3 for details.

Analysis of NRS Scores before and after
Treatment.The knee osteoarthritis patients in the control group, electroacupuncture group, and shock wave group were evaluated for NRS before treatment, 2 weeks after treatment, and 4 weeks after treatment.The results showed that there was no statistically significant difference in NRS scores between the three groups before treatment (P = 0:965).After 2 weeks and 4 weeks of treatment, the scores of patients with knee osteoarthritis in the electroacupuncture group and shock wave group were lower than those in the control group, and they were statistically significant (P < 0:001).
Repeated measures of variance were used to analyze the decline in NRS scores of each group before treatment, 2 weeks after treatment, and 4 weeks after treatment.The change of the decline over time was statistically significant (P < 0:001).The decline of NRS scores in the electroacupuncture group and shock wave group was greater than that of the control group.There was no statistically significant difference between the electroacupuncture group and the shock wave group.See Table 4 for details.

Analysis of WHOQOL-BREF Scale after Treatment.
The knee osteoarthritis patients in the control group, the electroacupuncture group, and the shock wave group were scored by WHOQOL-BREF before treatment and 4 weeks after treatment.The results showed that there was no statistically significant difference in the scores of the three groups before treatment.After 4 weeks of treatment, the physical, psychological, and social environment of each group changed significantly.The physiological and psychological scores of patients with knee osteoarthritis in the electroacupuncture group and shock wave group increased compared with those in the conventional group (P < 0:001).There was no statistical difference between the three groups after treatment.See Table 5 for details.

Adverse
Reactions.There were no adverse reactions in the electroacupuncture group and shock wave group during the one-month treatment course.The treatment is safe and effective.

Discussion
This study found that electroacupuncture combined with drugs and shock wave combined with drugs are more effective than conventional drug treatment in terms of arthritis index.The curative effect increases with the prolonged treatment time.There was no statistical difference between electroacupuncture and shock wave drugs.Clinical studies have shown that this effect may be related to the downregulation of the expression of IL-1β and MMP-3 in the synovial fluid of KOA patients and the upregulation of the expression of SOD [15].In terms of pain index, electroacupuncture combined with drugs and shock waves combined with drugs are more effective than conventional drug treatments.As the treatment time is extended, the efficacy increases.There was no statistical difference between electroacupuncture and shock wave drugs.Animal experiments have shown that this effect can adjust the metabolic environment of chondrocytes by reducing the content of IL-1β and TNF-α in articular cartilage, inhibit the catabolism of cartilage matrix, and inhibit cartilage degeneration, thereby reducing the damage of articular cartilage.
In addition, in terms of quality of life assessment, electroacupuncture combined with drugs and shock waves combined with drugs are more effective than conventional drug treatment in terms of physiological and psychological indexes.There was no statistical difference between electroacupuncture and shock wave drugs.There was no statistical difference with the conventional group in terms of social environment.There was no statistical difference between the groups before and after treatment.Studies have shown that electroacupuncture can effectively alleviate the symptoms of KOA.The mechanism of action may be related to downregulating the expression of AQP3 to regulate water transport, reduce the degradation of cartilage extracellular matrix, and reduce the destruction of articular cartilage.
The mechanism of this experiment needs to be further studied and proved in the future.

Table 1 :
Baseline data for the three general population groups.

Table 3 :
Score analysis of osteoarthritis index scores before treatment, after 2 weeks of treatment, and 4 weeks of treatment of the three groups (mean(SD)).

Table 4 :
NRS score analysis of the three groups before treatment, 2 weeks after treatment, and 4 weeks after treatment (mean(SD)).

Table 5 :
NRS score analysis of the three groups before treatment, 2 weeks after treatment, and 4 weeks after treatment (mean(SD)).