An appendiceal neoplastic lesion : Case report and implications for colonoscopic screening and surveillance

1Department of Gastroenterology; 2Department of Pathology; 3Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia Correspondence: Dr Hugh J Freeman, Department of Gastroenterology, University of British Columbia Hospital, 2211 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1W5. Telephone 604-822-7216, fax 604-822-7236, e-mail hugfree@shaw.ca Received for publication May 17, 2008. Accepted May 19, 2008 Neoplastic lesions of the appendix, first described in 1882, are still considered rare, particularly adenomas and carcinomas, and preoperative diagnosis is notoriously difficult (1). Even appendiceal carcinoids (ie, neuroendocrine tumours) are uncommon but their increased incidence in Crohn’s disease was only first recognized in resected intestine, previously reported in this Journal (2) and later confirmed elsewhere by others (3). In recent years, many agencies have developed guidelines (4-6) for screening and surveillance colonoscopy if previous colon polyps or colon carcinomas have been detected. Because the appendix and colon have reportedly similar mucosal patterns (7), it has been estimated that appendicular adenocarcinoma may account for approximately 1% of all colorectal malignancies. As colonoscopy numbers continue to increase as a direct result of screening and surveillance, it is likely that appendiceal lesions with or without involvement of the base of the cecum will be detected more often. Rarely, endoscopic resection of the appendix has been possible (8-10). The present case resulted in diagnosis and resection of an adenomatous lesion involving the appendix extending into the base of the cecum with high-grade dysplasia and raises some critical issues not fully evaluated in current endoscopic or surgical guidelines.

A 65-year-old man with a history of previously resected colonic adenomas had an apparent cecal lesion detected during colonoscopy.The polyp proved to be a tubulovillous adenoma with high-grade dysplasia involving most of the body of the appendix along with the base of the cecum.The appendiceal mucosa is biologically similar to the colonic mucosa, yet remains relatively 'hidden' in screening and surveillance studies, which suggests important implications for evolving detection strategies in the follow-up of patients with a previous colon polyp or cancer resections.Although endoscopic removal of the appendix has been reported, treatment of these localized appendiceal lesions requires a wide surgical excision.

Key Words: Appendiceal adenoma; Appendiceal carcinoid; Appendiceal carcinoma; Colonoscopy screening; Colorectal cancer
Lésion néoplasique à l'appendice : rapport de cas et répercussions sur le dépistage et le suivi coloscopiques because of a history of previous colon polyps or cancer represents a distinctly different clinical setting and may yield a higher rate of appendiceal neoplasms than these earlier surgical or pathological series have reported.
Indeed, risk of a neoplastic epithelial change in the appendix is likely to be similar to the colon because the biological characteristics of appendiceal and colon epithelia are also similar.Moreover, the heterogeneous nature of colonic adenomas (eg, sessile serrated adenoma) and their possible impact on future screening guidelines (11), is paralleled by reports of serrated neoplasms in the appendix (12).Moreover, recent studies using MLH-1, MSH-2, MGMT, beta-catenin, p53 and Ki-67 expression, BRAF and K-RAS mutations as well as microsatellite instability have also documented molecular features of this 'serrated neoplastic pathway' in appendiceal neoplasms (13).As colonoscopic guidelines for higher risk patients evolve, recognizing the risk of malignant neoplasms in the appendix may become more important than is currently appreciated.
Colonoscopic features of neoplastic lesions of the appendix have been described but are not specific.In particular, macroscopic cecal changes have been noted, including secreted mucin in the appendiceal orifice (14).Although endoscopic diagnosis and even colonscopic removal of the appendix may be technically feasible (8-10), neoplastic lesions, particularly if invasive, should still be completely resected with sufficient margins.In some patients, as in the present case, precise endoscopic definition of the site of origin (cecal or appendiceal), may be difficult (and, to some extent academic) if the appendiceal base (rather than the tip) appears to be the principal area of neoplastic change because complete surgical excision is essential.Indeed, multiple adenomas confined to the body of the appendix without cecal involvement have occurred, but wide excision of the adjacent colon was recommended (15).In malignant appendiceal neoplasms or even in those with a highgrade dysplasia and a high-risk of malignancy, more extensive excision should be performed.Many recommend right hemicolectomy as the treatment of choice for all malignant appendiceal neoplasms, except for small classical carcinoids less than 2 cm in diameter that are located at the tip of the appendix with a low proliferative index, without angiolymphatic or mesoappendiceal extension (1).
The true risk of appendiceal neoplasia in patients with colon cancer is not known.It has been estimated that the risk of synchronous colon neoplasia is 3%, with a further 2% to 3% risk of metachronous cancer in patients with colorectal cancer.In a recent report from the United Kingdom (7), consecutive patients having a left colectomy or anterior resection had a coincidental appendectomy.Data in this study were also collected from patients having a right hemicolectomy.In patients with colon cancer who had an appendix available for pathological review, more than 4% had synchronous appendiceal neoplastic lesions.Because the appendiceal mucosa cannot be fully assessed during surveillance colonoscopy, an argument has been made that coincidental appendectomy should be completed to remove the risk of future appendicitis or neoplasia.Further studies are needed to confirm this observation because of its important implications for future surveillance strategies and surgical treatment.