Bacteremia in a long term care facility

Episodes of bacteremia identified in a long term care facility over a seven and a half-year period from July 1984 to December 1991 were reviewed. Twenty-nine episodes of bacteremia were identified, a rate of 4.35/100,000 patient-days. The most common infecting organisms were Escherichia coli (11 episodes), Streptococcus pneumoniae (four), Proteus mirabilis (three), Staphylococcus aureus (three) and Bacteroides species (two). The source of bacteremia was urinary in 45% of patients, gastrointestinal in 17%, pneumonia in 14%, skin in 14% and unknown in 10%. The overall case fatality rate was 24%, but for the final six years of the review the case fatality rate was only 9.5%. These observations report a rate of bacteremia 10-fold lower than reported from other North American long term care facilities and, potentially, a lower case fatality rate. The primary site of bacteremia, however, in long term care facilities is the urinary tract.


R ESIDENTS OF LONG TERM CARE FACILITIES ARE AT
increased risk for infection because of associated comorbidities, interventions n ecessitated by chronic functional problems and, possib ly, because of institutionalization. Bacteremia is an important infection because it is generally associated with a high mortality.There is limited information available, however, that describes bacteremia occurring in long term care facilities.Studies reporting bacteremia in long term care facilities in the United States have identified urinary t ract infection as the most frequent source, and reported an incidence of about 0.3/1000 patient-days (1)(2)(3).The overall mortality has been 21 to 35%.The present study of bacteremia occurring in one long term care facility in Winnipeg, Manitoba over a seven and a half-year period was undertaken to exan1ine characteristics of bacteremia in the study population and to compare this experience with that reported from other facilities in North America.

Institution:
The Deer Lodge Centre is a long term care facility that was formerly a Veteran's Hospital.Most residents are male, with a male: female ratio of approximately 3.5: 1.During the period of this review, from July 1984 to December 1991, the centre varied in size from 199 to 420 beds.The remain ing acute care beds in the facility were progressively eliminated during this period and replaced by beds for assessment and rehabilitation.short term respite admissions and further long term care beds.This review describes bacteremia in permanent resid ents in the long term care facility beds at this institution.Residents who became acutely ill were transferred to the acute care ward in the facility where parenteral therapy and more intensive nursing care could be provided.They were not transferred to an acute care facility unless specialized intervention such as surgery was required .Laboratory methods: Blood cultures and other diagnostic tests were ordered based on clinical judgement by house officers on site 24 h a day.or by attending physicians.The centre had on -site laboratory facilities.Paired blood cultures were obtained from two different sites and inoculated into Becton-Dickinson supplemented peptone media.This was a manual system with visual observation and routine subcu ltures at 24 hand after five days of incubation.Identification and susceptibility testing of organisms followed standard methods.
Definitions and data analysis: Episodes of bacteremia were identified through review of laboratory records.
Patient records for all subjects with bacteremia were then reviewed.Data extracted included: patient demographic data: duration of admission: functional status: comorbidities; medication use; evidence supporting a potential primary s ite for bacteremia: and outcome.Evidence collected to document a primary site of infection included clinical presentation and ancillary laboratory and radiological studies.Standard definitions proposed for long term care facilities were used to identify a site of infection (4).Death was determined to  'Death not directly attributed to infection be due to infection if the resident was clinically not anticipated to die within the short term and no cause for death other than sepsis was identified.
Organisms isolated from blood cultures were judged to be contaminants based on the type of organism isolated (usually coagulase-negative staphylococci).patient presentation.lime to blood culture positivity and clinical course.The bacteremia rate was determined using a denominator of patient-days in long term care.

RESULTS
During the seven and a half-year review, 29 episodes of bacteremia were identified.An add itional three episodes with coagulase-negative staphylococci isolated were considered to be contaminants.These three coagu lase-negative staphylococci were isola ted in 1984, 1989 and 1990.The number of positive blood cu ltures and total number of blood cultures processed in th e laboratory is provided in Table 1.The overall proportion positive varied from 2 .9 to 11.9% in different years and was 6.3% for the entire review.
The most common infecting organism was Escherichia coli.accounting for l 1 (38%) of all isolates.Other organisms included StTeptococcus pneumoniae (four), Proteus mirabilis (three).Staphylococcus aureus (three) .Bacteroides species (two) and one each of Enterococcus jaecalis.beta-hemolytic streptococcus group B. betahemolytic streptococcus not group A or D, Klebsiella pneumoniae.KLebsiella oxytoca.Enterobacter agglomerans and Clostridium species.The most common source of bacteremia was the urinary tract (Table 2).Six (46%) of 13 episodes of genitourinary origin had recent trauma or known u nderlying gen itourinary abnormalities.The five gastrointestinal episodes included two gastrostomy tube s ite infections, two b iliary tract infections and one toxic m egacolon.The overall case fatality rate was seven (24%).with six of the seven deaths directly attribu table to infection (Table 2).Five (63%) of eight bacteremic subj ects died in the fi rst one and a h alf years but only two (9.5%) in the last six years of this review.

DISCUSSION
The overall rate ofbacteremia was 0.04/1000 patientdays in this long term care facility over the seven and a half-year period reviewed.The yearly variation in bacteremia rates was from 0 .031 to 0.068, suggesting that the bacteremia rate remained relatively stable over the study period.This observed rate is 10-fold lower than rates r eported previously by Muder et  Despite the lower bacteremia rate at this institution compared with these other reports, the observed case fatality rate of 24% was similar to the 21 to 35% rates of these other reports (1-3).In addition, the proportion of cases of bacteremia attributable to urinary tract infection.46%, was similar to the 55% and 56% proportions reported by these other authors .Thus, the urinary tract is the most common origin of bacteremic infection in long term care facility subjects (1-3).In about 50% of the cases of urinary origin.genitourinary trauma could be documented as a precipitating event.
Thus. although the bacteremia rate was substantially lower, other characteristics of bacteremia in the present population were similar to previous reports from American facilities.
While the overall case fatality of 24% was consistent with previous reports , a remarkably low mortality of less than 10% was observed during the final six years of the present review.The actual number of bacteremic episodes was small, and this may be a spurious variation.However. it does suggest that bacteremia in highly impaired nursing home residents may be associated with a relatively low mortality.
There are a number of potential explanations for the substantially lower bacteremia rate at the present institution.First the lower rate may be due to failure to obtain blood cultures in potentially bacteremic subjects.The on-site laboratory facilities and 24 h physician coverage would, however, encourage obtaining blood cultures.The previous reports do not comment on the total number of b lood cultures obtained in their populations.The positivity rate for blood cultures in our institution varied from 2.9 to 11.9% , with an overall rate of 6.3%, excluding potential contaminants.In acute care facilities, organisms are isolated from 8 to 12% of blood cultures, b u t this includes presumed contaminants, which occu r in 2 to 3% of blood cultures (5,6).Thus, our observed positivity rate of 6% is consistent with that reported from acute care facilities, and does not s u ggest a less frequent use of b lood cultures.The somewhat low rate of positive cu ltures may reflect increased use of b lood cultures in less ill subjects, rather than fai lure to obtain b lood cultures in residents likely to be bacteremic .
The other potential explanation fo r our lower observed bacteremia rate is lack of sensitivity of the laboratory methods used.These were manual methods with visual inspection.Muder et al (1) used a Bactec system.While the Bactec system may allow more rapid detection , a greater sensitivity compared with visual inspection and blind subculture would not be anticipated.Thus, differences in laboratory methods seem unlikely to eJ~..rplain the 10-fold difference in bacteremia observed.
If bias in patient selection for blood culture or less sensitive laboratory methods cannot explain the lower bacteremia rate, significant differences in patient populations or practices between institutions seems to be the likely explanation for the lower rate of bacteremia.More debilitated patients are more likely to experience bacteremia, but our population was as functionally impaired as that described by Setia et al (2) or Rudman et al (3).Some elements of nursing care related to invasive devices, such as foley catheters or, potentially , positioning of patients to prevent pneumonia, could influence the occurrence of bacteremic infections.Differences in antimicrobial use could also have an impact.We can only speculate on differences between institutional patient populations or practices to explain variations in bacteremia rates between ours and other reports.However, our observations do suggest that some long term care facilities may have bacteremia rates substantially lower than those previously reported.