At present, there are few relevant studies on the intensive sea use, and few scholars have provided qualitative and quantitative research examples on the interaction and interaction coupling relationship between intensive sea use and the marine economy. This study constructs comprehensive evaluation indicator systems using the Liaoning Coastal Economic Belt as the research object. The set pair analysis method is used to obtain comprehensive results, and the coupling coordination degree model is employed to carry out an in-depth analysis of the spatiotemporal characteristics of the interaction between intensive sea use and the marine economy. The results show the following. (1) The six cities in the Liaoning Coastal Economic Belt exhibited a fluctuating upward trend in the composite index for intensive sea use, but the intensive sea use level differed among the cities. The intensive sea use level of Huludao was the lowest among the six cities. (2) All cities in the Liaoning Coastal Economic Belt witnessed an upward trend in the marine economy development index, and the gaps between the cities gradually narrowed. The marine economy development index was ranked from top to bottom as follows: Jinzhou, Panjin, Dalian, Yingkou, Dandong, and Huludao. (3)The coupling coordination degree between intensive sea use and marine economy development was relatively stable in Dalian, Jinzhou, Yingkou, and Panjin, ranging approximately from 0.76 to 0.96, which indicates that the four cities witnessed good coordination between sea area utilization and marine economy development. The coupling coordination degree of Dandong and Huludao were relatively low, and Huludao consistently witnessed a low value.
With the launch of the “Maritime Power Strategy” and “Maritime Silk Road Initiative,” Chinese coastal provinces have begun to increase the utilization intensity of sea areas, gradually leading the marine economy to provide an important impetus for China’s economic growth [
Development activities in some coastal belts have had negative impacts on the marine environment, including habitat loss, degradation of fishery resources, deterioration of water quality, excessive pollutants in edible fish and shellfish, channel siltation, decline in productivity of biological resources, and invasion of alien species [
Research on marine economies has long been under development and mainly includes (1) research on marine economies [
Several studies delve into the marine economy, but only a few studies exist on intensive sea use. Researchers have conducted qualitative and quantitative studies on intensive sea use, but there is no example of the interaction and coupling between sea area utilization and the marine economy.
Therefore, the innovation of this paper lies in taking the Liaoning Coastal Economic Belt as an example, through the model method, the interaction and coupling between sea area utilization and the marine economy are quantitatively analyzed; this study constructs a comprehensive evaluation indicator system for both intensive sea use and the marine economy. Then, the set pair analysis method is used to comprehensively measure intensive sea use and the marine economy specifically in the Liaoning Coastal Economic Belt. This study explores the correlation mechanism between the intensive utilization of sea areas and the marine economy and probes into the coordinated relationship between the two. This study draws lessons from the principles of the index system for intensive land utilization established in previous research to create an index system for intensive water use, and this study using a relative development degree model to measure the level of intensive sea utilization and marine economic development.
Establishing a concept of intensive sea use is an important basis for constructing a relevant evaluation indicator system, and it is necessary for analyzing the interaction and coupling mechanism between intensive sea use and the marine economy. The theory of intensive use was first applied to land use. Based on relevant theoretical research on the intensive use of land [
Research on the human-sea relationship in coastal areas must recognize that oceans are an important part of the human-sea regional system. The marine system is closely related to the development of human society. Human beings rely on land to form a human-sea system (consisting of human beings, oceans, and land) in the process of marine development and utilization. The human-sea regional system essentially exhibits an interrelated and interactive relationship between human society and the sea and land resource environments. The human-sea regional system always transforms between disorder and order and between balance and imbalance due to the interaction between its complex internal and external connections. The human-sea regional system and the synergy among its components enables the system to shift from disorder to order, thereby leading to system evolution from simple to complex levels [
From the perspective of self-organization theory, human beings develop and utilize marine resources and marine space by investing in certain production factors such as labor, technology, and capital to promote constant and steady growth in the marine economy and facilitate orderly change in the structure and scale of sea area utilization and improvement in the potential of sea resources [
Mechanism of interaction between intensive utilization and the marine economic system in sea areas.
Under the human-sea regional system, human beings rely on land to develop and utilize marine resources, forming a human-sea regional system composed of humans, oceans, and land. This study, in reference to the
The Liaoning Coastal Economic Belt, located in the northeastern part of China, is adjacent to the Bohai Sea and Yellow Sea and includes six coastal cities: Dalian, Dandong, Jinzhou, Yingkou, Panjin, and Huludao (Figure
The geographical location of the research area.
In 2016, the regional GDP of the Liaoning Coastal Economic Belt was CNY 1,141.04 billion. The marine GDP reached CNY 391.7 billion, accounting for 31% of the regional GDP [
Liaoning coastal economic belt has obvious geographical advantages. It is the main sea passage and important window of opening up for the combination of Northeast China and Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei metropolitan circle. It has extremely prominent strategic position and regional advantages. The adoption of
The sea use type and area data in this study were obtained from the relevant confirmation data of the Department of Ocean and Fisheries of Liaoning Province from 2005 to 2017 (Table
Introduction of data and data sources.
Data | Data sources |
---|---|
Marine utilization type and ocean area data | Based on confirmation data from Liaoning provincial department of marine and fishery, and some data is obtained from remote sensing |
Socioeconomic data | China Ocean Statistical Yearbook, Liaoning Statistical Yearbook, Bulletin of Liaoning’s Marine Environmental Status, and statistical yearbooks and statistical bulletins on national economic and social development for the relevant cities |
Investment in fixed assets in coastal areas, gross product per unit sea area, and marine GDP | Calculation is based on index data from the China Marine Statistical Yearbook |
Diversity index of sea area use types, sea area use equilibrium index, sea area utilization rate, shoreline development intensity, and economic density of coastline | The department of oceanography and fisheries of Liaoning province extracted information from remote sensing images based on relevant confirmation data |
Marine economy contribution rate, port cargo throughput, technology investment intensity, return on investment for fixed assets, and coefficient of labor elasticity | Based on the statistical yearbook of Liaoning province and the statistical yearbook and bulletin on national economic and social development of the cities |
Marine water quality composite index and marine function zoning compliance | Liaoning bulletin on the state of the marine environment and reports on the quality of the marine environment in the cities concerned |
According to the definition of intensive sea use, input status, utilization structure, economic benefits, and sustainability of sea area utilization are the main factors determining the level of intensive sea use. Based on the definition and connotation of intensive sea use, this study drew on the indicator system for intensive land use evaluation [ Sea use structure mainly refers to the utilization structures of different sea use types, indicating the structural allocation status of sea resources and the distribution of marine industries and sea use types. It was measured by the sea use type diversity index Sea input intensity reflects the material basis provided by each production factor in the sea use process. It was measured by three indicators: fixed-asset investment per unit of sea area, coastline development intensity, and sea use rate. The fixed-asset investment per unit of sea area indicates the amount of capital investment in sea areas; the coastline development intensity indicates the investment in coastline resources; the sea use rate reflects the sea use level of the study area. Marine economic benefits were measured by three indicators: total production per unit of sea area, expropriation of sea use royalties, and contribution rate of the marine economy. The total production per unit of sea area represents the economic benefits generated per unit of sea area. The expropriation of sea use royalties indicates the paid use of sea areas, which is expressed by the ratio of the total sea use royalties expropriated to the sea area used. The contribution rate of the marine economy is expressed by the proportion of the total marine GDP in the regional GDP, which reflects the proportion of marine economic growth in regional economic growth. The sustainability of sea use reflects the sustainability of intensive sea use based on the advantages and disadvantages of the marine environment. It was measured by two indicators, composite index for sea water quality and the conformity of marine functional zoning. The composite index for sea water quality is reflected by the compliance rate of sea water quality. The conformity of marine functional zoning indicates the suitability of sea area development to marine functional zoning.
Comprehensive evaluation indicator system for intensive sea use.
Criterion level | Level-1 indicator | Level-2 indicator | Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Measures for intensive sea use level | Sea use structure | Sea use type diversity index | 0.47 |
Sea use structure balance index | 0.53 | ||
Fixed-asset investment per unit of sea | 0.36 | ||
Sea input intensity | Area | ||
Sea use rate | 0.42 | ||
Coastline development intensity3 | 0.22 | ||
Total production per unit of sea area | 0.48 | ||
Marine economic benefits | Expropriation of sea use royalties | 0.26 | |
Contribution rate of marine economy | 0.25 | ||
Sustainability of sea use | Composite index for sea water quality | 0.46 | |
Conformity of marine functional zoning4 | 0.54 |
The marine economy indicates the status of various industrial activities for developing, utilizing, and protecting the oceans and the associated economic activities [ The degree of development of the marine economy was measured by three indicators: total marine GDP, port cargo throughput, and coastline economic density. Total marine GDP represents the overall development of the marine economy. Port cargo throughput represents the role of ports in marine economic growth. Coastline economic density represents the economic intensity of coastline resource utilization and development activities. The structure of marine industries reflects the composition, interrelationship, and proportion of each marine industry. It was measured by the location quotient of marine industries and the marine industry structure index. The location quotient of marine industries reflects the contribution of leading marine industries to marine economic growth. The marine industry structure index reflects the structural status of secondary and tertiary marine industries. The potential of marine economy development is used to measure sustainable use in marine economy development. It was measured by three indicators: labor elasticity coefficient, density of marine scientific research institutions, and the rate of return on fixed-asset investment of marine industries. The labor elasticity coefficient reflects the promotion of sea-based employment growth to the marine economy. The density of scientific research institutions reflects the support of marine science and technology investment for the development of the marine economy. The rate of return on fixed-asset investment of marine industries reflects the degree of support of marine capital investment for marine economic benefits.
Comprehensive evaluation indicator system for the marine economy.
Criterion level | Level-1 indicator | Level-2 indicator | Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Comprehensive evaluation of the marine economy | Degree of development of the marine economy | Total marine GDP in coastal areas | 0.13 |
Port cargo throughput | 0.13 | ||
Coastline economic density | 0.14 | ||
Structure of the marine industries | Location quotient of marine industries ( | 0.09 | |
Marine industry structure index6 | 0.14 | ||
Development potential of the marine economy | Technology investment intensity | 0.2 | |
Rate of return on the fixed-asset investment of marine industries | 0.14 | ||
Labor elasticity coefficient | 0.03 |
It is used to evaluate the development and utilization of coastline by human activities. It is expressed by the artificial index of coastal zone, that is, the length of artificial shoreline/total length of shoreline.
The conformity of marine function zone planning reflects the connection between marine function zoning and sea area use. According to the degree, it is divided into five grades: consistent, well compatible, compatible, conditionally compatible, and nonconforming.
It is used to evaluate the intensity of economic activities and resource utilization on the coastline of coastal urban units, that is, gross marine product/coastline length.
In this study, the data were nondimension processed using the min-max normalization method. The coefficient of variation was used to determine the weight of each indicator. The weighting was based on the degree of variation of the observed values of the indicators on the to-be-evaluated objects [
Generally, the larger the difference of index value, the more can reflect the difference of evaluated units and the greater the impact on comprehensive evaluation. The calculation formula is as follows:
Set pair analysis refers to an identity-discrepancy-contrary (IDC) quantitative analysis on certain and uncertain problems. It can solve multiobjective decision-making and multiattribute evaluation problems and has been widely used in related research fields [
The capacitive coupling model from physics [
The coupling degree only refers to the degree of mutual influence between the two systems, whereas the coupling coordination degree can express the degree of coordination between the two systems [
The coupling coordination degree model can evaluate the degree of coupling coordination between intensive sea use and marine economy development but cannot evaluate their relative degree of development. Therefore, the relative development degree model was used to calculate the relative development coefficient of intensive sea use and the marine economy:
Classification criteria and types of degree of coordination.
Degree of coupling coordination | Relative development degree | Characteristics of coordination types | Type | Coordination stage |
---|---|---|---|---|
0 < | 0 < | The sea use status lags behind the marine economy, restricting the development of the marine economy; sea areas tend to be extensively utilized | I | Separation |
0.8 < | The sea use status synchronizes with the marine economy, facilitating the development of the marine economy; sea areas tend to be intensively utilized | II | ||
1.2 ≤ | The sea use status is ahead of the marine economy, affecting the development of the marine economy; sea areas tend to be excessively utilized | III | ||
0.3 < | 0 < | The sea use status lags behind the marine economy, restricting the development of the marine economy; sea areas tend to be extensively utilized | IV | Antagonism |
0.8 < | The sea use status synchronizes with the marine economy, facilitating the development of the marine economy; sea areas tend to be intensively utilized | V | ||
1.2 ≤ | The sea use status is ahead of the marine economy, affecting the development of the marine economy; sea areas tend to be excessively utilized | VI | ||
0.5 < | 0 < | The sea use status lags behind the marine economy, restricting the development of the marine economy; sea areas tend to be extensively utilized | VII | Run-in |
0.8 < | The sea use status synchronizes with the marine economy, facilitating the development of the marine economy; sea areas tend to be intensively utilized | VIII | ||
1.2 ≤ | The sea use status is ahead of the marine economy, affecting the development of the marine economy; sea areas tend to be excessively utilized | IX | ||
0.8 < | 0 < | The sea use status lags behind the marine economy, restricting the development of the marine economy; sea areas tend to be extensively utilized | X | Coordination |
0.8 < | The sea use status synchronizes with the marine economy, facilitating the development of the marine economy; sea areas tend to be intensively utilized | XI | ||
1.2 < E | The sea use status is ahead of the marine economy, affecting the development of the marine economy; sea areas tend to be excessively utilized | XII |
As shown in Figure
Composite index for intensive sea use.
It can be seen in Figure
Composite index for the marine economy.
Panjin witnessed a constant decline in the marine economy development index before 2009 and a slow rise after 2009. This is because the sea use type diversity index and sea use structure balance index of Panjin were relatively low, and the endogenous power for the development of the marine economy was insufficient from 2004 to 2009. With the establishment of Panjin Port and the gradual transformation of its marine industry structure after 2010, the comprehensive strength of Panjin’s marine economy gradually increased. Dalian, as an important city in the Liaoning Coastal Economic Belt, is economically developed and possesses unique marine resources. However, due to its large sea area and coastline base, Dalian had relatively low fixed-asset investment intensity, coastline development intensity, and sea use rate. Its marine economy development index was ranked in the middle of the six cities. The sea use type for Dandong was of low diversity, with fish culture being the main type for a long time. The long-term low value of the sea use structure index has restricted the development of marine economy in Dandong. Yingkou Port has obvious resource advantages; however, an insufficient investment in science and technology and inappropriate industrial structure have led to relatively limited capability with regards to overall sea development. In Huludao, low diversity of sea use types and inefficient use and idleness of coastal resources were the main reasons for the long-term low marine economic benefit index in the city. Huludao should further diversify its development efforts in terms of sea use in the future.
From 2004 to 2016, the coupling coordination degree between intensive sea use and marine economy development was relatively stable in Dalian, Jinzhou, Yingkou, and Panjin, ranging approximately from 0.76 to 0.96 (see Figure
Evaluation of the degree of coordination between intensive sea use and marine economy.
The degrees of coupling coordination between intensive sea use and marine economy development in Dandong and Huludao were relatively low, and Huludao consistently witnessed a low value. This was due to the low diversity in the sea use types of these two cities. Dandong has long used sea areas for fish cultivation. In both 2004 and 2016, the sea area for fishery accounted for 92% and 70% of the total sea area, respectively. In Huludao, engineering construction is the main type of sea use, and the marine industry structure is not reasonable. However, during the study period, the index showing coupling coordination between intensive sea use and marine economy development in Huludao increased from 0.54 in 2004 to 0.80 in 2016, making Huludao the fastest growing region among the six coastal cities in the Liaoning Coastal Economic Belt. This phenomenon indicates that, in Huludao, both the structure and scale of sea area utilization are undergoing orderly changes, and the sea use structure tends to be rationalized. In addition, the rational use of sea resources has promoted the development of the marine economy, indicating that Huludao is in the process of entropy reduction of the human-sea regional system.
The degree of coupling coordination can only indicate the coordination value between intensive sea use and marine economy development, while the relative development degree can be used to analyze the relative development between intensive sea use and marine economy development. Therefore, this study used ArcGIS software to draw a spatial evolution map for the relative development degree of the six cities in the Liaoning Coastal Economic Belt in 2004, 2008, 2012, and 2016. On this basis, the changes in the relative development degree between intensive sea use and marine economy development in the six cities were analyzed, as shown in Figure
Spatial variation of relative development degree of six coastal cities in Liaoning Province. (a) 2004. (b) 2008. (c) 2012. (d) 2016.
In 2004, Dandong and Huludao were classified under Type VIII, indicating that their intensive sea use and the marine economy were developing synchronously in the run-in state; Jinzhou and Panjin fell under Type XI. In 2008 and 2012, Jinzhou and Panjin also fell under Type XI. However, in 2016, only Jinzhou fell into Type XI. In 2004, Dalian fell under Type IX, indicating that the intensive sea use and the marine economy were in the run-in state, the intensive sea use was ahead of the development of the marine economy, and excessive sea use led to the degradation of the human-sea regional system; Yingkou fell into Type XII. In 2008, Dalian, Dandong, and Yingkou were classified as Type XII. In addition, Huludao fell into Type IX, indicating that the intensive sea use and the marine economy were in the run-in state. The intensive sea use was ahead of the development of marine economy, and excessive sea use led to the degradation of the human-sea regional system. In 2012, Dalian, Dandong, and Yingkou fell into Type XII, and Huludao fell under Type IX. In 2016, Dalian, Dandong, Yingkou, Panjin, and Huludao all fell into Type XII. In general, intensive sea use was ahead of marine economy development in more and more regions during the study period, that is, excessive sea use caused a waste of sea resources. As a result, the use of sea areas was inconsistent with the development of the marine economy, and the human-sea regional system generally remained in the entropy increase process. Therefore, in the future, these cities should appropriately plan the use of sea areas based on the principle of maximizing the comprehensive benefits to promote the sustainable development of the marine economy.
Taking the Liaoning Coastal Economic Belt as the research object, this study constructed an evaluation indicator system for intensive sea use and marine economy development from the perspective of the human-sea-land relationship and based on the connotation of intensive sea use. The set pair analysis method was employed to conduct a quantitative analysis on the levels of intensive sea use and marine economy in the study area from 2004 to 2016. The coupling coordination degree model was used to analyze the spatiotemporal evolution characteristics of the coordination between intensive sea use and the marine economy in the Liaoning Coastal Economic Belt. The following conclusions were drawn: From 2004 to 2016, the composite indexes for both intensive sea use and the marine economy in the Liaoning Coastal Economic Belt rose. In terms of the composite index for intensive sea use, there was a great gap between Huludao and other five cities. In terms of the composite index for the marine economy, the gap between cities gradually narrowed during the study period. According to the calculation results of the coupling coordination degree model, the level of coupling coordination between intensive sea use and marine economy in the Liaoning Coastal Economic Belt gradually increased from 2004 to 2016, which tended to be good resonant coupling. Huludao was in the separation state prior to 2016 and evolved into the run-in state in 2016. Dandong was in the run-in state before 2016 and evolved into the coordination state in 2016. Dalian, Panjin, Jinzhou, and Yingkou were in the coordination state throughout the study period. In terms of the relative development index, the relative degree of development between intensive sea use and marine economy in the Liaoning Coastal Economic Belt did not show any of the characteristics of Types I–VII. It did not experience the separation and antagonism stages during the study period. The regions in the run-in stage gradually disappeared, and there were a small number of cities that experienced synchronous development. Intensive sea use was ahead of marine economy development under the coordination and optimization stage in more and more regions. Even in the same coordination stage, the relative degree of development between intensive sea use and marine economy varied with cities. In actual planning, it is necessary to coordinate and distinguish among the differences between cities.
Based on the analysis of the mechanism of intensive sea use and marine economy from the perspective of the human-sea system, this paper builds a comprehensive evaluation index system of intensive sea use and marine economy. Based on the set pair analysis method, the comprehensive evaluation of the sea area intensive utilization and marine economy of the Liaoning coastal economic belt is carried out. Through calculation and coupling model, the in-depth analysis of the spatial and temporal evolution characteristics between the intensive use of the sea area and the marine economy in the Liaoning coastal economic zone reveals the interaction mechanism and the law of development and change of the intensive use of the sea area and the development of the marine economy. The research results can provide support for the rational development and utilization of marine resources and the formulation of marine economic development policies and have important scientific and practical significance.
However, the study does have some limitations. The definitions and connotation of the index system of intensive utilization in China needs to be further improved because the research on intensive utilization is still in the exploratory stage. In addition, in terms of the model, the coupling coordination degree model is established to evaluate the coupling coordination between intensive utilization and marine economy by referring to the coupling concept in physics. In order to quantify the relationship between the marine economy and marine intensive utilization more accurately, the model needs to be further explored.
The data used to support the findings of the study are available from the corresponding author upon request.
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.
The article was translated into English and edited by Editage (