Case Reports in Hematology
Volume 2021 (2021), Article ID 2348977, 6 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/2348977

Case Report

Combined Ruxolitinib and Venetoclax Treatment in a Patient with a BCR-JAK2 Rearranged Myeloid Neoplasm

Coen J. Lap,¹ Samah Nassereddine,¹ Min-Ling Liu,² Victor E. Nava,² and Anita Aggarwal1,2

¹The George Washington University Medical Faculty Associates, Washington, DC, USA
²Washington DC Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA

Correspondence should be addressed to Coen J. Lap; clap@mfa.gwu.edu

Received 22 May 2021; Revised 12 July 2021; Accepted 17 July 2021; Published 28 July 2021

Academic Editor: Håkon Reikvam

Copyright © 2021 Coen J. Lap et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

Hematological malignancies with a BCR-JAK2 rearrangement have been described only sporadically in the literature over the last three decades. Although most patients suffer from a chronic myeloid neoplasm with marked eosinophilia, the clinical presentation varies significantly and can even manifest as a lymphoid malignancy. In this case report, we present a patient with a therapy-related BCR-JAK2⁺ myeloid neoplasm with extensive extramedullary disease localizing in the lymph nodes. While treatment with a JAK2 inhibitor (ruxolitinib) was not able to stop disease progression, combination treatment with inhibitors of both JAK2 and BCL2 (venetoclax) resulted in disease control for over 1.5 years. Combining these two inhibitors might be strategic in these patients, not only because BCL2 is a downstream target of JAK/STAT signaling but also because BCL2 is crucial for JAK2 inhibitor resistance. The recent inclusion of JAK2-rearranged malignancies in major classification systems and guidelines emphasizes the importance of not only getting a better understanding of the clinical phenotype of these rare disorders but also of identifying alternative treatment options for patients ineligible for allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Considering the low toxicity of combination treatment with these two small molecule inhibitors, this regimen could be further explored in future studies.

1. Introduction

Activating mutations in Janus kinase 2 (JAK2), which include JAK2 V617F and mutations in exon 12, are found in a high proportion of patients diagnosed with chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN), including >95% of patients with polycythemia vera and approximately 55–65% of patients with essential thrombocytosis and primary myelofibrosis [1]. While these mutations are considered crucial molecular events in the pathogenesis of these disorders, rare chromosomal translocations involving JAK2 have been described in patients suffering from both myeloid and lymphoid malignancies [2, 3]. The t(9; 22) (p24.1; q11.2) is a recurrent rearrangement that juxtaposes the Breakpoint Cluster Region gene (BCR; 22q11.2) to the JAK2 gene (9p24.1), which leads to the formation of a BCR-JAK2 fusion [4]. While this translocation has been identified in patients diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL), most case reports have described it as the sole genetic abnormality observed in patients suffering from a clinical disease that resembles myeloid neoplasms, including MPN, myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), or MPN/MDS overlap syndromes and is often associated with significant extramedullary hematopoiesis and/or bone marrow failure [2, 3, 5–8]. In most patients, the disease is highly therapy-resistant with rapid progression occurring within the first couple of months after diagnosis [9]. While JAK2 inhibitors have been suggested to be of some benefit in controlling disease, so far, long-term remissions have only been achieved after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) [10, 11]. Here, we describe a case of a patient suffering from a therapy-related BCR-JAK2⁺ myeloid neoplasm with significant disease localized in his lymph nodes. While monotherapy with a JAK2 inhibitor (ruxolitinib) was not able to control disease, combined treatment with inhibitors of JAK2 and BCL2 (venetoclax) resulted in disease control for over 1.5 years. A rationale for combining these two small molecule inhibitors is provided as an additional option, which could be further explored for patients with this rare hematological malignancy, especially when allo-SCT is not feasible.

2. Case Presentation

A 54-year-old male presented initially in February 2013 with left axillary lymphadenopathy. He was diagnosed with stage IIA nodular lymphocyte predominant Hodgkin lymphoma (NLPHL) and received two cycles of ABVD (adriamycin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine) before he became lost to follow-up. In March 2014, he presented again with biopsy-proven relapsing NLPHL. A bone marrow aspirate was performed at that time, revealing an unremarkable flow analysis and a normal karyotype (46XY [12]). He received three cycles of R-EPOCH (rituximab, etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, and doxorubicin) with additional radiation therapy to the left axillary region for residual disease. He remained in complete remission until May 2018, when he presented with fatigue, a 25 kg weight loss over three months and was found to be anemic with a hemoglobin (Hgb) of 7.2 g/dL, platelet count (Plt) of 159 × 10³/µL, and a white blood cell count (WBC) of 6.1 × 103/µL. Peripheral blood smear revealed a neutrophilic left-shift with 3% myelocytes, 2% metamyelocytes, and 6% eosinophils. Evaluation of the red blood cells (RBC) revealed marked anisopoikilocytosis, teardrop cells, and 2% nucleated RBC. No circulating blasts were seen. FDG-PET/CT displayed extensive FDG-avid lymphadenopathy (SUVmax∼10) with splenomegaly measuring 18.4 cm. Bone marrow (BM) biopsy demonstrated a hypercellular BM with left-shifted myeloid hyperplasia but less than 1% blasts (Figure 1(a)), an increased myeloid to erythroid ratio (>5 : 1) and diffuse grade 3 reticulin fibrosis (Figure 1(b)). Cytogenetics revealed a 46XY, del(6) (p21.2p24), t(22; 9; 11) (q11.2, p24, p11.2) [11]/46XY, del(9) [9] karyotype with fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis showing absence of a BCR-ABL1 rearrangement, but three copies of BCR (Figure 2). The third copy of BCR was identified to be on the short arm terminus of chromosome 9 resulting in a BCR-JAK2 fusion as suggested with an additional JAK2 (9p24.1) probe (not shown). The rearrangement was confirmed with RNA sequencing, which revealed a break in exon 1 of BCR (nucleotide 1107 and codon 369) and a break in exon 17 of JAK2 (nucleotide 2171 and codon 724) leading to an in-frame fusion. The resulting product included the coiled-coil oligodimerization domain of BCR as well as the area distal to the pseudokinase domain (JH2) of JAK2, thereby maintaining the active tyrosine kinase domain (JH1) in exon 19. Additional mutation analysis was negative for JAK2 V617 F or alterations in CALR, PDGFRA, PDGFRB, or FGFR1 but did reveal an alteration in CD36 (c.157_158AA > G_p.N53 fs  24). Excisional biopsy of a lymph node ruled out lymphoma, but revealed extensive extramedullary involvement of the same myeloid malignancy with prominent erythroid precursors, atypical megakaryocytes, and left-shifted myeloid cells without increase of blasts (Figure 3). Importantly, the same BCR-JAK2 translocation was identified in the biopsy and confirmed with RNA sequencing.

(a)

(b)

Figure 1: Bone marrow biopsy showing a hypercellular marrow with marked myeloid hyperplasia with left shift ((a) hematoxylin and eosin stain, 400x) and grade 3 fibrosis ((b) reticulin stain, 200x).

Figure 2: Fluorescent in situ hybridization with probes for BCR (22q11.2, green signal) and ABL1 (9q34.1, red signal) was negative for a BCR-ABL1 rearrangement. However, a third signal for the BCR probe (green signal, arrow) was observed, suggesting partial or complete gain of chromosome 22 or a translocation that involves BCR with a partner gene other than ABL1. Additional testing with a probe for JAK2 (9p24.1, not shown) suggested the presence of a BCR-JAK2 fusion, which was confirmed with RNA sequencing.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

Figure 3: Lymph node showing extensive extramedullary involvement by a myeloproliferative neoplasm with numerous megakaryocytes ((a) hematoxylin and eosin stain, 400x), no increase in blasts ((b) CD34 immunostain, 400x), or significant myeloid cells ((c) MPO immunostain, 400x) but with prominent erythroid precursors ((d) CD71 immunostain, 400x).

Pending the results of the molecular analysis, the patient was started on the BCR-ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) imatinib mesylate 400 mg once daily due to an initial concern of CML. Because of limited response and upon identification of the BCR-JAK2 translocation, treatment was switched to ruxolitinib and uptitrated to 20 mg twice daily. An early referral for allo-SCT was discussed, but the patient decided to postpone this. While initially an improvement in blood counts was observed (Hgb, 10.8 g/dL; Plt, 180 × 10³/µL; WBC, 8.1 × 103/µL) with a reduced need for transfusions, he developed worsening anemia (Hgb, 7.8 g/dL), thrombocytopenia (Plt, 30 × 10³/µL), and leukocytosis (WBC, 17.6 × 103/µL) with an elevated LDH (680 U/L) in January 2019. A peripheral smear revealed 6% promyelocytes, 3% metamyelocytes, 6% eosinophils, and 2% blasts, but repeated bone marrow evaluation only showed diffuse fibrosis and the previously identified BCR-JAK2 translocation. The spleen remained enlarged at 19 cm on imaging. Ruxolitinib was continued, and because of disease progression, venetoclax was initiated and uptitrated to 400 mg daily. At that point, he was evaluated for allo-SCT but was found ineligible due to diminished pulmonary function. After several weeks, blood counts improved, and the patient became transfusion-independent and EPO support was discontinued. Over time, his blood counts normalized (Hgb, 12.4 g/dl; Plt, 167 × 10³/µL; WBC, 5.7 × 10³/µL with 2% eosinophils) with repeat imaging, six months after the start of venetoclax, revealing a significant decrease in lymphadenopathy and a reduction in the spleen size to 13.1 cm. A new BM biopsy showed stable disease with extensive fibrosis, no increase in blasts, but persistence of the BCR-JAK2 fusion and the CD36 alteration, as well as a new TET2 mutation (c.3782 G > A_p.R1261H). During this time, the patient tolerated the combination regimen well without development of infections, need for blood product support, or hospitalizations. Although no cytogenetic response was observed, the treatment significantly improved his quality of life. He remained stable under this combination treatment until May 2020, at which point he presented with abdominal complaints and renal failure as a result of bulky lymphadenopathy and splenomegaly due to disease progression. Ruxolitinib and venetoclax were discontinued. Blood counts revealed Hgb, 11 g/dL; Plt, 170 × 10³/µL; and WBC, 12.1 × 10³/µL with a peripheral smear showing left-shifted hematopoiesis with 4% eosinophils and 1% blasts. Renewed bone marrow analysis only revealed fibrosis without a significant increase in blasts. The patient was started on azacytidine and re-evaluated for allo-SCT. However, allo-SCT was further postponed as a result of the patient contracting COVID-19. During that period, azacytidine was continued, and ruxolitinib was restarted. Unfortunately, the disease progressed with worsening bone marrow failure, without signs of transformation, and he passed away several months later.

3. Discussion

The 2017 revision of the World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of Myeloid Neoplasms and Acute Leukemia included a new provisional entity “Myeloid Neoplasm with PCM1-JAK2 Rearrangement” in the category of “Myeloid/Lymphoid Neoplasms Associated with Eosinophilia and Rearrangement of PDGFRA, PDGFRB, or FGFR1, or with PCM1-JAK2” [12]. While the patient described here does not have a hematological malignancy with a PCM1-JAK2 rearrangement, many experts in the field advocate to classify those rare cases with a JAK2 rearrangement, including gene partners other than PCM1, in the same category because of similar clinical features [13]. This is also highlighted by the inclusion of patients with a BCR-JAK2 rearrangement in the latest version of the U.S. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines for “Myeloid/Lymphoid Neoplasms with Eosinophilia and Tyrosine Kinase Fusion Genes” (version 3.2021). Regardless of the classification, the presence of a BCR-JAK2 translocation has not been linked to a specific clinical phenotype although most patients present as a chronic myeloid neoplasm with marked eosinophilia (∼50–70%) (Table 1). However, eosinophilia can be notably absent and is not a requirement for the diagnosis. Additionally, BCR-JAK2 rearrangements are sometimes identified in the new provisional entity of Philadelphia chromosome-like ALL, which are characterized by activated tyrosine kinase signaling as well as JAK/STAT signaling but lack the presence of a BCR-ABL1 rearrangement [19]. The clinical heterogeneity may be the result of both disease factors (additional mutations and subclones) as well as existing host factors (germline allele diversity). Our patient presented with symptoms of a myeloid malignancy with a newly acquired BCR-JAK2 rearrangement, four years after treatment for relapsing NLPHL. Considering that the patient had a normal bone marrow evaluation at the time of his relapsing NLHPL and was subsequently exposed to cytotoxic chemotherapy, including etoposide and cyclophosphamide, it supports a diagnosis of a therapy-related malignancy. It is likely that clonal evolution and expansion over time have resulted in a secondary myeloid neoplasm. Although the clinical significance of a CD36 N53 fs24 mutation is not clear at the moment, it is important to mention that it has been identified in patients with mixed phenotype acute leukemia’s (MPAL) [20]. More importantly, the R1261H missense mutation in the epigenetic modifier TET2 is a recurrent abnormality identified in (therapy-related) myeloid malignancies and is considered a driver of clonal hematopoiesis [21].

Table 1: Summary of the literature regarding described phenotype, treatment, and response duration of patients with a BCR-JAK2 fusion.

Reference
Age
Sex
Disease
Treatment
Follow-up

Griesinger et al. [2]
63
F
CML-like MPD, myeloid blast crisis
Imatinib, hydroxyurea, interferon-alpha
Complete hematological response. 20 months after diagnosis, she developed myeloid blast crisis and died.

Kantarcioglu et al. [3]
64
F
MDS
Not described
Died 3 months after diagnosis

Cuesta-Domínguez et al. [4]
58
M
B-ALL
Not described
Not described

Cirmena et al. [5]
67
F
AML
Not described
Not described

Tirado et al. [6]
14
M
B-ALL
Not described
Not described

Snider et al. [7]
59
M
MPN with eosinophilia, MPAL
Hydroxyurea, chemotherapy, allo-SCT
Transformation to MPAL 12 months after diagnosis. No evidence of disease 30 days after allo-SCT.

Elnaggar et al. [8]
84
M
CML-like MPD
Imatinib
Lost to follow-up

Schwaab et al. [10]
n/a
n/a
Myeloid neoplasm
Ruxolitinib 20 mg BID, allo-SCT
Complete hematological and cytogenetic remission on ruxolitinib. Relapsed after 18 months upon which referred for allo-SCT.

Schwaab et al. [11]
69
M
MDS/MPN
Ruxolitinib 20 mg BID, allo-SCT
Complete hematological, cytogenetic, and molecular response. AlloSCT while in remission

He et al. [14]
36
F
MPN with eosinophilia
Dasatinib, allo-SCT
No response of dasatinib. No evidence of disease 18 months after allo-SCT.

Bellesso et al. [15]
54
M
BCR-ABL⁻ CML
Imatinib, dasatinib, allo-SCT
No response of imatinib or dasatinib. Died of aGvHD 53 days after allo-SCT

Impera et al. [16]
49
F
MPN-unclassifiable
Imatinib, dasatinib peg-interferon
No initial response with imatinib or dasatinib. Partial hematological response with peg-interferon

Lane et al. [17]
44
M
Atypical CML with leukemia cutis
Not described
Not described

Thakral et al. [18]
31
M
MPN with eosinophilia
Hydroxyurea, allo-SCT
No evidence of disease three months posttransplantation

CML, chronic myeloid leukemia; MPD, myeloproliferative disorder; MDS, myelodysplastic syndrome; B-ALL, B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia; AML, acute myeloid leukemia; MPN, myeloproliferative neoplasm; MPAL, mixed phenotype acute leukemia; allo-SCT, allogeneic stem cell transplantation; BID, twice a day; aGvHD, acute graft-versus-host disease; F, female; M, male.

As a result of the t(9; 22) (p24.1; q11.2), a fusion gene is formed in which the oligodimerization domain of BCR is juxtaposed to the JAK2 tyrosine kinase domain resulting in constitutive activation of the JAK/STAT signaling pathway, which promotes cellular proliferation, differentiation, and growth [4, 22]. JAK inhibitors such as ruxolitinib (JAK1/2) have been used successfully in patients with JAK2-mutated MPN and, as such, have been proposed as a possible treatment for patients with a BCR-JAK2⁺ myeloid malignancy [10, 11]. Unfortunately, responses seen in the handful of patients treated to date have been mixed with some progressing rapidly and others obtaining a complete cytogenetic response. However, even cytogenetic responses are usually short-lived due to the development of JAK2 inhibitor resistance. Although our patient had an initial response after the start of ruxolitinib, he progressed five months later, prompting initiation of the BCL2 inhibitor venetoclax. Combining these two inhibitors may be strategic since downstream transcriptional targets of JAK/STAT signaling include antiapoptotic members of the BCL2 family, such as BCL2 and BCL-xl [23–25]. Several preclinical studies have suggested a beneficial synergistic effect of combining these two inhibitors in patients with JAK2-mutated hematological malignancies [25–27]. Moreover, resistance to JAK2 inhibitors has been attributed to overexpression of both BCL2 and BCL-xl. Although our patient did not develop a cytogenetic remission, the combination treatment stabilized the disease for over 1.5 years, achieving normal blood counts and significant reduction in splenomegaly and lymphadenopathy before final progression.

Even with combination treatment, our patient eventually developed progressive disease and succumbed before he was able to undergo allo-SCT. Although combined treatment might be able to control disease for a significant period of time, even when monotherapy with a JAK2 inhibitor fails, only allo-SCT results in long-term disease control, affirming the need for early referral. It needs to be emphasized that TKIs used for the treatment of BCR-ABL1⁺ CML have not shown to be of any benefit and should be avoided in the treatment of these patients [11]. Considering the rarity of hematological malignancies with a BCR-JAK2 translocation, it remains important to report cases to disseminate clinical experience, which may allow better characterization of the clinical phenotype and provide beneficial insights regarding targeted therapy regimens for patients who are not eligible for allo-SCT.

4. Conclusion

BCR-JAK2-rearranged hematological malignancies are rare disorders that can have a variable clinical presentation but should be classified as a “Myeloid/Lymphoid Neoplasms with Eosinophilia and Gene Rearrangement.” Because eosinophilia can be discrete, or even absent, it highlights the importance of cytogenetic analysis in all patients that are presenting with a myeloid neoplasm. Combination treatment with inhibitors of JAK2 and BCL2 has minimal toxicity and can be beneficial in controlling disease.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and any accompanying images.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

All authors contributed equally to this work.

References

A. Tefferi, “Novel mutations and their functional and clinical relevance in myeloproliferative neoplasms: JAK2, MPL, TET2, ASXL1, CBL, IDH and IKZF1,” Leukemia, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 1128–1138, 2010.

F. Griesinger, H. Hennig, F. Hillmer et al., “ABCR-JAK2 fusion gene as the result of a t(9;22)(p24;q11.2) translocation in a patient with a clinically typical chronic myeloid leukemia,” Genes, Chromosomes and Cancer, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 329–333, 2005.

B. Kantarcioglu, I. Kaygusuz-Atagunduz, A. Uzay, T. Toptas, T. F. Tuglular, and M. Bayik, “Myelodysplastic syndrome with t(9;22)(p24;q11.2), a BCR-JAK2 fusion: case report and review of the literature,” International Journal of Hematology, vol. 102, no. 3, pp. 383–387, 2015.

Á. Cuesta-Domínguez, M. Ortega, C. Ormazábal et al., “Transforming and tumorigenic activity of JAK2 by fusion to BCR: molecular mechanisms of action of a novel BCR-JAK2 tyrosine-kinase,” PLoS One, vol. 7, no. 2, Article ID e32451, 2012.

G. Cirmena, S. Aliano, G. Fugazza et al., “A BCR-JAK2 fusion gene as the result of a t(9;22)(p24;q11) in a patient with acute myeloid leukemia,” Cancer Genetics and Cytogenetics, vol. 183, no. 2, pp. 105–108, 2008.

C. A. Tirado, W. Chen, L. J.-s. Huang et al., “Novel JAK2 rearrangement resulting from a t(9;22)(p24;q11.2) in B-acute lymphoblastic leukemia,” Leukemia Research, vol. 34, no. 12, pp. 1674–1676, 2010.

J. S. Snider, I. Znoyko, K. G. Lindsey et al., “Integrated genomic analysis using chromosomal microarray, fluorescence in situ hybridization and mate pair analyses: characterization of a cryptic t(9;22)(p24.1;q11.2)/BCR-JAK2 in myeloid/lymphoid neoplasm with eosinophilia,” Cancer Genetics, vol. 247, pp. 44–47, 2020.

M. M. Elnaggar, S. Agersborg, T. Sahoo et al., “BCR-JAK2 fusion as a result of a translocation (9;22)(p24;q11.2) in a patient with CML-like myeloproliferative disease,” Molecular Cytogenetics, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 23, 2012.

C. A. Smith and G. Fan, “The saga of JAK2 mutations and translocations in hematologic disorders: pathogenesis, diagnostic and therapeutic prospects, and revised World Health Organization diagnostic criteria for myeloproliferative neoplasms,” Human Pathology, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 795–810, 2008.

J. Schwaab, M. Knut, C. Haferlach et al., “Limited duration of complete remission on ruxolitinib in myeloid neoplasms with PCM1-JAK2 and BCR-JAK2 fusion genes,” Annals of Hematology, vol. 94, no. 2, pp. 233–238, 2015.

J. Schwaab, N. Naumann, J. Luebke et al., “Response to tyrosine kinase inhibitors in myeloid neoplasms associated with PCM1 ‐ JAK2 , BCR‐JAK2 and ETV6‐ABL1 fusion genes,” American Journal of Hematology, vol. 95, no. 7, pp. 824–833, 2020.

S. Swerdlow, E. Campo, N Harris et al., WHO Classification of Tumours of Haematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues, iARC Press, Lyon, France, 4th edition, 2017.

A. Reiter and J. Gotlib, “Myeloid neoplasms with eosinophilia,” Blood, vol. 129, no. 6, pp. 704–714, 2017.

R. He, P. T. Greipp, A. Rangan et al., “BCR-JAK2 fusion in a myeloproliferative neoplasm with associated eosinophilia,” Cancer Genetics, vol. 209, no. 5, pp. 223–228, 2016.

M. Bellesso, R. Santucci, D. F. Dias, R. Centrone, and R. C. Elias, “Atypical chronic myeloid leukemia with t(9; 22)(p24, 11.2), a BCR-JAK2 fusion gene,” Revista Brasileira de Hematologia e Hemoterapia, vol. 35, pp. 218-219, 2013.

L. Impera, A. Lonoce, D. A. Fanfulla et al., “Two alternatively spliced 5′BCR/3′JAK2 fusion transcripts in a myeloproliferative neoplasm with a three-way t(9; 18; 22)(p23; p11.3; q11.2) translocation,” Cancer Genetics, vol. 204, no. 9, pp. 512–515, 2011.

S. W. Lane, D. J. Fairbairn, C. McCarthy, A. Nandini, J. Perry-Keene, and G. A. Kennedy, “Leukaemia cutis in atypical chronic myeloid leukaemia with a t(9; 22) (p24; q11.2) leading to BCR-JAK2 fusion,” British Journal of Haematology, vol. 142, no. 4, p. 503, 2008.

B. Thakral, T. Muzzafar, S. A. Wang, and L. J. Medeiros, “Myeloid neoplasm with eosinophilia and BCR-JAK2/t(9; 22)(p24; q11.2) morphologically mimicking chronic myeloid leukemia,” Annals of Diagnostic Pathology, vol. 44, Article ID 151405, 2020.

S. Jain and A. Abraham, “BCR-ABL1-like B-acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma: a comprehensive review,” Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, vol. 144, no. 2, pp. 150–155, 2020.

B. M. Getta, M. Roshal, J. Zheng et al., “Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with myeloablative conditioning is associated with favorable outcomes in mixed phenotype acute leukemia,” Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, vol. 23, no. 11, pp. 1879–1886, 2017.

R. L. Bowman, L. Busque, and R. L. Levine, “Clonal hematopoiesis and evolution to hematopoietic malignancies,” Cell Stem Cell, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 157–170, 2018.

E. Bousoik and H. Montazeri Aliabadi, “Do we know Jack” about JAK? A closer look at JAK/STAT signaling pathway,” Frontiers in Oncology, vol. 8, p. 287, 2018.

P. Sepúlveda, A. Encabo, F. Carbonell-Uberos, and M. D. Miñana, “BCL-2 expression is mainly regulated by JAK/STAT3 pathway in human CD34+ hematopoietic cells,” Cell Death & Differentiation, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 378–380, 2007.

I. Sakai and A. S. Kraft, “The kinase domain of Jak2 mediates induction of bcl-2 and delays cell death in hematopoietic cells,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 272, no. 19, pp. 12350–12358, 1997.

A. Zeuner, F. Pedini, F. Francescangeli et al., “Activity of the BH3 mimetic ABT-737 on polycythemia vera erythroid precursor cells,” Blood, vol. 113, no. 7, pp. 1522–1525, 2009.

B. Will, T. Siddiqi, M. A. Jordà et al., “Apoptosis induced by JAK2 inhibition is mediated by Bim and enhanced by the BH3 mimetic ABT-737 in JAK2 mutant human erythroid cells,” Blood, vol. 115, no. 14, pp. 2901–2909, 2010.

M. Waibel, V. S. Solomon, D. A. Knight et al., “Combined targeting of JAK2 and BCL-2/BCL-XL to cure mutant JAK2-driven malignancies and overcome acquired resistance to JAK2 inhibitors,” Cell Reports, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 1047–1059, 2013.