Case Reports in Infectious Diseases
Volume 2019 (2019), Article ID 5892913, 7 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/5892913

Case Report

Treating Primary Arthroprosthesis Infection Caused by Mycobacterium abscessus subsp. abscessus

Valerio Pace,¹ Pierluigi Antinolfi,¹ Emanuele Borroni,² Daniela Maria Cirillo,² Elio Cenci,³ Claudio Piersimoni,⁴ Angela Cardaccia,³ Marco Nofri,⁵ Chiara Papalini,⁵ Rosario Petruccelli,¹ Fabrizio Marzano,¹ and Maria Bruna Pasticci⁵

¹Traumatology and Orthopedic Clinic, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
²Emerging Bacterial Pathogens Unit, Division of Immunology, Transplantation and Infectious Diseases, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
³Microbiology Section, Department of Medicine, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
⁴Regional Reference Mycobacteriology Unit-Clinical Pathology Laboratory, United Hospitals, Ancona, Italy
⁵Infectious Disease Clinic, Department of Medicine, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy

Correspondence should be addressed to Maria Bruna Pasticci; mariabruna.pasticci@unipg.it

Received 8 May 2019; Accepted 9 October 2019; Published 16 December 2019

Academic Editor: Jean-François Faucher

Copyright © 2019 Valerio Pace et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

Prosthetic joint infections (PJI) caused by nontuberculous mycobacteria are very rare, and results of treatment can be unpredictable. A 72-year-old female underwent hip replacement after an accidental fall in a local hospital in Santo Domingo. The postoperative period was uneventful except for a traumatic wound near the surgical scar. PJI caused by Mycobacterium abscessus subsp. abscessus was diagnosed 6 months later. A two-stage reimplantation was performed after a 3-month period of aetiology-directed therapy, including amikacin, imipenem, and clarithromycin. M. abscessus isolate was reported to be resistant to clarithromycin when incubation was protracted for 14 days and to harbour the gene erm(41). The patient manifested major side effects to tigecycline. At reimplant, microbiologic investigations resulted negative. Overall, medical treatment was continued for a 7-month period. When discontinued and at 6-month follow-up, the patient was clinically well, inflammatory markers were normal, and the radiography showed well-positioned prosthesis. Mycobacterium abscessus subsp. abscessus is a very rare cause of PJI, yet it must be included in the differential diagnosis, especially when routine bacteria cultures are reported being negative. Further investigations are needed to determine any correlations between clinical results and in vitro susceptibility tests, as well as the clinical implications of M. abscessus subsp. abscessus harbouring the functional gene erm(41). Moreover, investigations are needed for determine optimal timings of surgery and lengths of medical therapy to improve patient outcome.

1. Introduction

Joint replacements are becoming more common surgical procedures, able to significantly improve the patient quality of life [1, 2]. Minor and major complications have relatively low rates, with reported prosthetic joint infection (PJI) rate of around 1% [3–6]. Infection onset can be early after the surgical procedure or delayed. Risk factors for infection do not significantly vary from those of other types of infections, with the relevant adjunct that revision arthroplasty or history for PJI can particularly increase the risk [6]. Staphylococci and other Gram-positive bacteria are the most common microorganisms isolated from prosthetic joint infection (about 60%). Infections can be also caused by Gram negatives, anaerobes, and fungi. A similar amount of cases have been reported to be polymicrobial or culture negative. Mycobacterium tuberculosis and other nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) rarely cause PJI [3–6].

The correct aetiology identification of the infection is essential, in order to provide an accurate and adequate treatment [3–5]. Bacterial cultures of synovial fluids, removed prostheses, and intraoperative tissue samplings are recommended before the prescription of any antibiotic therapy [3–5]. With regards to mycobacterial aetiology, routine cultures can lead to false-negative results. Moreover, infections caused by mycobacteria, including M. tuberculosis and NTM, are rare and results of treatment can be unpredictable [7–15]. There is a paucity of results in the literature on the treatments and outcomes of mycobacterial PJI [16]; likewise, there are a limited number of publications on PJI caused by M. abscessus complex. Over the last two decades, the literature has reported the presence of inducible resistance genes for macrolides, which are considered important components in the treatment of infections caused by these microorganisms [17, 18].

We present a case of M. abscessus subsp. abscessus primary prosthetic hip infection diagnosed and treated.

2. Case Report

A 72-year-old female patient presented on the 15th of January 2018 to a local hospital in S. Domingo, after a fall which caused a fracture of her right femur. Three days after admission, the patient underwent a total hip replacement (THR) (posterolateral approach). Clinical findings, routine postoperative blood results, and postoperative radiography controls were all satisfactory, with no signs of complications. Early mobilization and rehabilitation was started on the 1st postop day. The patient was discharged on the 5th postop day and was able to mobilize with two crutches. Routine post-THR instructions were followed by the patient with good compliance. Two weeks later, the patient reported a traumatic superficial wound on the surgical scar that healed spontaneously in a few days. The patient did not refrain from bathing or swimming in the ocean.

The patient returned to Italy on the 11th of March 2018 and continued with the postoperative physiotherapy. However, she started to complain of right inguinal pain, which became progressively worse. A month later, the patient was evaluated at an emergency room because of a red swelling over the proximal part of the wound. The area was drained, and levofloxacin 500 mg a day oral for one week was prescribed. At the next control, no findings were detected.

However, after another month, due to worsening of the pain, the patient was evaluated at the trauma-orthopaedic (TO) clinic of our hospital: Santa Maria della Misericordia, Perugia, Italy. On clinical examination, the range of motion was satisfactory with regards to rotations and extension and hip flexion was limited by pain, but the wound was healed. Radiograph results showed no signs of infection, prosthesis loosening, or other abnormalities.

On the 24th of June 2018, 5 months after surgery, due to ongoing pain and limited hip flexion, the patient underwent a repeated radiography. At this time, a radiolucency around the acetabular component of the prosthesis was evidenced (Figure 1). An ultrasonography of the right hip showed multiple little fluid areas around the prosthesis with the aspect of multiple abscesses. Therefore, the patient was admitted to the TO clinic.

Figure 1: Hip radiography: radiolucency around the acetabular component of the prosthesis.

On admission (29th of June 2018), past medical history included hypercholesterolemia, previous atrial fibrillation (not currently in treatment), gastritis, and aortic valve replacement in July 2017 (biologic prosthesis). She denied any allergy. Drug history included proton pump inhibitors, escitalopram, simvastatin, and pain killers when required. She denied smoking and drinking. The physical examination evidenced normal vital signs, a systolic murmur, and a limited motion of the hip due to pain. Only the day of admission temperature 37.8°C was recorded. Laboratory investigations showed erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) 85 (normal range: 1–30 1st hour), C-reactive protein (CRP) 5.6 mg/dL (normal range 0.0–0.5 mg/dL), and white blood count (WBC) 5.34 (normal range: 3.60–9.60 × 10³/µL). Liver and kidney function tests were normal. An ultrasound-guided right hip joint aspirate was performed on the 2nd of July and sent for microbiological investigations. Also urine and blood cultures were collected and both resulted negative. Both transthoracic and a transesophageal echocardiography were performed, and both showed the absence of cardiac valve vegetations or any other relevant cardiac abnormality. The biologic valve, which had been replaced in 2017, was well functioning. Teicoplanin 400 mg/day IV and imipenem 500 mg TID IV were started on the 2nd of July (patient’s weight was 45 kg).

However, the periprosthetic fluid aspirate (1 sample) results on the 11th of July showed growth of acid-fast bacilli (AFB), identified as Mycobacterium abscessus. Given these findings, a further aspirate was obtained on the same day to confirm the result. The sample was examined also with acid-fast stain, which resulted negative for AFB (Table 1). Teicoplanin was discontinued while imipenem was confirmed, and clarithromycin 500 mg BID orally and amikacin 500 mg once a day IV were started (Table 1). Meanwhile, a revision procedure was planned and performed the day after. The previous scar and a posterolateral approach were used. No fistulas were noticed, and the state of the skin around the right hip was satisfactory with no redness or palpable masses. However, there was purulence between the bone and acetabular part of the prosthesis, and the acetabular component was loosed. On the contrary, the femoral part of the prosthesis was stable. A femoral fracture occurred while removing the prosthesis. A vancomycin-gentamycin antibiotic-loaded spacer was implanted. An intraoperative bone sample along with the explanted prosthesis was collected for microbiologic studies with the sonication technique. Microscopy examination evidenced purulence but microorganisms were not observed. Culture results were obtained on the 20th of July, and evidenced M. abscessus growth (antibiotic susceptibility tests are reported in Table 2) along with Enterococcus faecalis. Both microorganisms grew only from the sonication fluid of the prosthesis broth culture. E. faecalis was susceptible to ampicillin, teicoplanin, vancomycin, and tigecycline. The ongoing antibiotic treatment was maintained, and linezolid 600 mg BID orally was added (Table 1).

Table 1: Microbiology, medical, and surgical treatments.

Date
Microbiology results
Medical therapy
Surgical procedures
Side effects

07/02/2018
Periprosthesis fluid: M. abscessus
Imipenem, teicoplanin
Periprosthetic aspirate

07/11
Periprosthesis fluid: negative
Imipenem, amikacin, clarithromycin
Periprosthetic aspirate

07/12
Prosthesis: M. abscessus + E. faecalis
Periprosthesis bone: negative
Imipenem, amikacin, clarithromycin, linezolid
Prosthesis explanted vancomycin + gentamycin-loaded spacer

07/27

Imipenem, amikacin, clarithromycin
PICC-line positioned

08/09

Imipenem, amikacin, clarithromycin

08/17

Imipenem, amikacin, clarithromycin

09/18

Imipenem, amikacin, clarithromycin

10/20

Imipenem, clarithromycin

Suspected amikacin ototoxicity

10/26

Tigecycline, amikacin

Probable in vitro imipenem resistance

11/10

Imipenem, amikacin

Tigecycline gastric intolerance

11/14
Spacer + bone samples: no growth
Imipenem, amikacin,
Prosthesis reimplant

11/27

Imipenem, amikacin, clarithromycin

12/04

Imipenem, amikacin, clarithromycin

12/05

Imipenem, clarithromycin
PICC-line explanted
Suspected amikacin ototoxicity

12/10

Imipenem, clarithromycin
PICC-line positioned

12/12

Tigecycline, clarithromycin

Tigecycline gastric intolerance and hepatitis

12/20

Clarithromycin

03/01/2019

Clarithromycin
PICC-line explanted
Stop clarithromycin

Table 2: Mycobacterium abscessus subsp. abscessus: in vitro antibiotic susceptibility and genome sequencing results. Breakpoints according to CLSI [19].

Antibiotics
07.02.2018
08.07.2018
10.01.2018
10.02.2018

4-day reading (mg/L)
4-day reading (mg/L)
14-day reading (mg/L)
14-day reading (mg/L)

23s-wild type-macrolide constitutive resistance not detected

16s-wild type-susceptible to amikacin erm(41)-wild type-macrolide-inducible resistance detected

Amikacin
3 (S)

16 (S)

Tigecyclin
0.5 (S)

0.75 (S)

Clarithromycin
0.5 (S)
1.5 (S)
4 (R)
4 (R)

Imipenem
4 (S)

32 (R)

Linezolid
8 (R)

>256 (R)

Azitromycin
128 (R)

Moxifloxacin
>32 (R)

Gentamycin
12 (R)

E-test, Middlebrook 7H-11 agar; broth microdilution testing, Middlebrook 7H-9 broth.

The postoperative radiography showed satisfactory results (Figure 2).

(a)

(b)

Figure 2: Hip radiography: anteroposterior and oblique views after prosthesis explant and spacer positioning.

A week later, a PICC-line catheter was inserted, and after 4 days, the patient was transferred initially to the Infectious Disease Clinic of our hospital and then to a rehabilitation centre where the patient continued on the antibiotic treatment and clinical and laboratory monitoring (Table 1).

Drug susceptibility testing (DST), was performed on the M. abscessus subsp. abscessus isolate using the E-test (AB Biodisk, Solna, Sweden) and the broth microdilution methods, the former with both 4 day and 14 day readings (Sensititre, Trek Diagnostic Systems, USA) [20, 21]. Results were evaluated according to the breakpoints reported in the CLSI document from 2011 (Table 2) [19].

In addition to phenotypic DST, the isolate also underwent gene sequencing using the Illumina platform MiniSeq (Table 2). Results revealed the presence of the wild-type gene erm(41) conferring inducible clarithromycin resistance [17, 20, 22, 23], while no mutations for the gene 23s affecting macrolide susceptibility and the gene 16s affecting amikacin susceptibility were found.

The patient was readmitted on the 20th of October, 3 months after the prosthesis had been explanted, at the Infectious Disease Clinic to be evaluated for prosthesis reimplant. On the day of admission, amikacin was discontinued (Table 1).

On admission, the patient was clinically and hemodynamically well, wound and surrounding skin conditions did not show findings of infection, and range of motion was limited as expected for the presence of the spacer. Laboratory examinations were in the normal range.

Due to the in vitro susceptibility tests and gene sequencing results, antibiotic treatment was modified (Table 1). A two stage revision procedure was performed on the 14th of November, and a new hip prosthesis was implanted. Again, the previous scar and the posterolateral approach were used. The spacer was removed and sent together with a bone sample to the microbiology laboratory for sonication cultures that resulted negative for M. abscessus and any other microorganism. Urine and blood cultures were also drawn and were negative.

In the postoperative period, antibiotic treatment was further modified due to tigecycline intolerance (Table 1). Thereafter, the patient was clinically well, without signs of local or systemic infection. Postoperative radiography showed good position of the prosthesis (Figure 3).

(a)

(b)

Figure 3: Hip radiography after prosthesis reimplant.

At discharge, pain was under control, skin and wound in good conditions, the mobility status was satisfactory, and antimicrobial therapy consisted of amikacin 500 mg IV once a day, clarithromycin 500 mg orally BID, and imipenem 500 mg TID IV (Table 1).

The follow-up every 2 weeks included clinical evaluation and inflammatory markers as well as liver and renal function tests (Table 1).

In December 2018, the patient was admitted because laboratory parameter evidenced an increase of ESR and PCR values. On admission, the patient was feeling well, she had no fever, and on physical examination there were no systemic or local signs of infection over the right hip. The PICC-line was changed, and cultures resulted negative. ESR resulted normal five days later. M. abscessus directed therapy was again modified discontinuing imipenem and amikacin and adding tigecycline 50 mg twice a day IV to clarythromicin. Eight days later, tigecycline had to be interrupted again due to gastric intolerance and increased transaminases.

Eighteen weeks after prosthesis was reimplanted, the patient had no pain, the prosthesis was functioning well, the inflammatory parameters were normal, and clarithromycin, the only antibiotic left for the last 3 weeks, was discontinued (Table 1).

At follow-up 6 months after treatment discontinuation, the patient had no pain, inflammatory markers were normal, and prosthesis was functioning well.

3. Discussion

We present a case of PJI caused by Mycobacterium abscessus subsp. abscessus.

Mycobacterium abscessus subsp. abscessus PJI was defined by the presence of clinical manifestations and the growth of the microorganism from the periprosthetic aspirate and the sonication fluid of the prosthesis.

M. abscessus subsp. abscessus belongs to rapidly growing NTM. Its growth requires specific media, yet it can develop also into routine bacterial plates or broth culture media in about one week. However, its identification can be missed when cultures are incubated for only 48 hours [10, 14, 16, 24].

Overall, infections due to member species of the M. abscessus complex are not uncommon and are consequent to the exposition to these microorganisms. Nevertheless, the association between exposition and infection is difficult to diagnose and usually reported only for health care-associated infections or outbreaks following specific procedures. M. abscessus complex most commonly causes skin, soft tissue, and pulmonary infections; however, any human tissue can be involved. The complex rarely has been reported to cause PJI, and usually it is in the early postoperative period [10–16, 24]. In our patient, clinical symptoms started within 3 months from surgery, and it is not clear if the prosthesis infection occurred when it was first implanted or afterwards, when the patient reported a traumatic skin wound and eventually tissue exposition to mycobacteria present in tap water or in the environment.

Symptoms of PJI caused by nontuberculous mycobacteria are nonspecific. In our patient, the only symptom was pain that started soon after the prosthesis was implanted. At that time, there were no indications for further investigation because pain can be a common finding in most cases of joint arthroplasty in the early postoperative period and it is usually related to the procedure itself. As a result, the first time we had a suspicion of infection was 6 months after surgery when the radiography evidenced a radiolucency around the acetabular component of the prosthesis, and above all, when the ultrasonography showed multiple abscesses surrounding the prosthesis, the inflammatory markers resulted to be elevated and M. abscessus was isolated from the synovial fluid aspirate. Overall, the clinical course was that of a subacute, early/delayed PJI.

With regard to treatment, the past studies have reported correlations between treatment protocols and outcomes for NTM prosthetic joint infections. Nevertheless, there are no treatment protocols relating to in vitro susceptibility tests, gene studies, and the clinical response, especially when M. abscessus PJI is diagnosed [10–16, 23–25]. Overall, in order to treat the patient and prevent recurrence, there is an agreement that a combination of antibiotics and a long-course therapy are best indicated. Among the antibiotics, amikacin is reported to lead to good outcome, together with clarithromycin, fluoroquinolones, and imipenem [10–16, 23–25]. However, M. abscessus is a complex and comprises three different subspecies: M. abscessus subsp. abscessus, M. abscessus subsp. bolletii, and M. abscessus subsp. massiliense [23, 26] that may have different susceptibility patterns. Specifically, M. abscessus subsp. abscessus and M. bolletii might harbour a functional gene erm(41) leading to lack of efficacy of macrolide; therein, raising questions on the utility of clarithromycin in the treatment of infections caused by these microorganisms with inducible macrolide resistance [18, 27, 28]. To investigate for this probability, gene sequencing is advisable. However, when this is not possible in vitro susceptibility tests with also an extended incubation periods are recommended [19, 22, 29].

As in the majority of patients with PJI, while awaiting synovial fluid aspirate results, the initial treatment for our patient was empiric, directed against the more common microorganisms causing PJI. The identification of M. abscessus as the aetiology of PJI in our patient necessitated the resetting of the therapeutic regime, following indications from the current literature and the E-test susceptibility reports with shorter incubation time. According to those results, imipenem, clarithromycin, and amikacin were active against the isolate [19]. However, contradictory results were obtained when clarithromycin activity was evaluated with broth microdilition technique and extending the incubation period to 14 days [19]. The same issue emerged also for imipenem. Being so, while a prolonged incubation is recommended to test clarithromycin in vitro activity [19, 29, 30], a long incubation time can cause the inactivation of other antibiotics such as imipenem [28, 30]. In light of this, the reported results might have been misleading. Overall, these in vitro tests were time consuming and caused delays and doubts on the efficacy of the antibiotics we were administering. In treating our patient, we were also faced with a delay in the isolate identification at the subspecies level, as well as the results of the genetic investigations evaluating for the presence of the inducible gene erm(41). The presence of this gene has been reported associated with clarithromycin resistance. The patient also encountered side effect experienced from the tigecycline administration, which was reported to have a good in vitro activity against the patient M. abscessus isolate.

In our patient, E. faecalis was also grown from the sonication fluid of the prosthesis, but it was diagnosed as a contamination, as it grew only from one sample and only in the broth culture. Nevertheless, even if E. faecalis had an aetiological significance, it was ampicillin susceptible, therefore, susceptible to imipenem, and the patient was treated with imipenem for 5 months.

According to scientific evidence, debridement and implant removal are both very important in the treatment of PJI infections, including those caused by NTM. Most favourable outcomes seem to be related to a two-stage revision surgery strategy with removal of the infected prosthesis and insertion of the antibiotic cement spacer (1st stage) to be followed by timely reimplantation of a new prosthesis. We followed the aforementioned recommendations [10–16]. The medical treatment in this case consisted of amikacin, imipenem, and clarithromycin, for 7 months and, overall, this combination of antibiotics in addition to surgery revealed to be successful.

With regard to clinical and functional outcomes, the patient exhibited a good range of motion before discharge and at an early (6 months) follow-up was pain free and able to walk. The wound was well healed with no evidence of local infection. The patient also referred to be satisfied with the treatments, and regained her quality of life.

4. Conclusions

Mycobacterium abscessus subsp. abscessus is a very rare cause of PJI, yet it must be included in the differential diagnosis, especially when routine bacteria cultures are reported being negative. Further investigations are needed to determine any correlations between clinical results and in vitro susceptibility tests, as well as the clinical implications in treating infections caused by M. abscessus subsp. abscessus harbouring the functional gene erm(41). Finally, investigations are needed to study optimal timings of surgery and lengths of medical therapy.

Consent

The authors obtained written informed consent from the patient.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

MB P, M N, and C P were the attending infectious diseases physicians, who reviewed the literature and wrote the manuscript; V P, P A, R P, F M, and P A were the attending orthopaedic surgeons, who also contributed to the writing of the manuscript; E B, M D C, CE, C P, A C, and E C performed microbiologic investigations. All the authors read and approved the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the patient for consenting them to report her case.

References

O. Ethgen, O. Bruyère, F. Richy, C. Dardennes, and J.-Y. Reginster, “Health-related quality of life in total hip and total knee arthroplasty,” The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, vol. 86, no. 5, pp. 963–974, 2004.

P. Räsänen, P. Paavolainen, H. Sintonen et al., “Effectiveness of hip or knee replacement surgery in terms of quality-adjusted life years and costs,” Acta Orthopaedica, vol. 78, no. 1, pp. 108–115, 2007.

D. R. Osmon, E. F. Berbari, A. R. Berendt et al., “Executive summary: diagnosis and management of prosthetic joint infection: clinical practice guidelines by the infectious diseases society of America,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2013.

D. R. Osmon, E. F. Berbari, A. R. Berendt et al., “Diagnosis and management of prosthetic joint infection: clinical practice guidelines by the infectious diseases society of America,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. e1–e25, 2013.

S. Corvec, M. E. Portillo, B. M. Pasticci, O. Borens, and A. Trampuz, “Epidemiology and new developments in the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection,” The International Journal of Artificial Organs, vol. 35, no. 10, pp. 923–934, 2012.

J. L. Del Pozo and R. Patel, “Infection associated with prosthetic joints,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 361, no. 8, pp. 787–794, 2009.

S.-J. Kim and J. H. Kim, “Late onset Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection after total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and pooled analysis,” Scandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 45, no. 12, pp. 907–914, 2013.

G. L. Wolfgang, “Tuberculosis joint infection following total knee arthroplasty,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, vol. 201, pp. 162–166, 1985.

C.-L. Lee, Y.-S. Wei, Y.-J. Ho, and C.-H. Lee, “Postoperative Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection after total knee arthroplasty,” The Knee, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 87–89, 2009.

A. J. Eid, E. F. Berbari, I. G. Sia, N. L. Wengenack, D. R. Osmon, and R. R. Razonable, “Prosthetic joint infection due to rapidly growing mycobacteria: report of 8 cases and review of the literature,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 45, no. 6, pp. 687–694, 2007.

M. Kim, C.-W. Ha, J. W. Jang, and Y.-B. Park, “Rapidly growing non-tuberculous mycobacteria infection of prosthetic knee joints: a report of two cases,” The Knee, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 869–875, 2017.

P. Amit, S. Rastogi, and S. Marya, “Prosthetic knee joint infection due to Mycobacterium abscessus,” Indian Journal of Orthopaedics, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 337–342, 2017.

J. M. Spanyer, S. Foster, J. A. Thum-DiCesare et al., “Mycobacterium abscessus: a rare cause of periprosthetic knee infection,” The American Journal of Orthopedics, vol. 47, no. 9, pp. 1–13, 2018.

A. Jitmuang, V. Yuenyongviwat, K. Charoencholvanich, and M. Chayakulkeeree, “Rapidly-growing mycobacterial infection: a recognized cause of early-onset prosthetic joint infection,” BMC Infectious Diseases, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 801–810, 2017.

M. W. Henry, A. O. Miller, B. Kahn, R. E. Windsor, and B. D. Brause, “Prosthetic joint infections secondary to rapidly growing mycobacteria: two case reports and a review of the literature,” Infectious Diseases, vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 453–460, 2016.

S.-X. Wang, C.-J. Yang, Y.-C. Chen, C.-J. Lay, and C.-C. Tsai, “Septic arthritis caused by Mycobacterium fortuitum and Mycobacterium abscessus in a prosthetic knee joint: case report and review of literature,” Internal Medicine, vol. 50, no. 19, pp. 2227–2232, 2011.

K. A. Nash, N. Andini, Y. Zhang, B. A. Brown-Elliott, and R. J. Wallace Jr., “Intrinsic macrolide resistance in rapidly growing mycobacteria,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 50, no. 10, pp. 3476–3478, 2006.

F. P. Maurer, V. Ruegger, C. Ritter, G. V. Bloemberg, and E. C. Bottger, “Acquisition of clarithromycin resistance mutations in the 23S rRNA gene of Mycobacterium abscessus in the presence of inducible erm(41),” Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, vol. 67, no. 11, pp. 2606–2611, 2012.

Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute, Performance Standards for Susceptibility Testing of Mycobacteria, Nocardia ssp., and other Aerobic Actinomycetes, Approved Standard, Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute, Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2nd edition, 2011.

G. L. Woods, J. S. Bergmann, F. G. Witebsky et al., “Multisite reproducibility of results obtained by the broth microdilution method for susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium abscessus, Mycobacterium chelonae, and Mycobacterium fortuitum,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 1676–1682, 1999.

J. Biehle, S. J. Cavalieri, M. Saubolle, and L. J. Getsinger, “Evaluation of Etest for susceptibility testing of rapidly growing mycobacteria,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 33, no. 7, pp. 1760–1764, 1995.

B. A. Brown-Elliot, S. Vasireddy, R. Vasireddy et al., “Utility of sequencing the erm(41) gene in isolates of Mycobacterium abscessus subsp. abscessus with low and intermediate clarithromycin MICs,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 1211–1216, 2015.

K. E. Hanson, E. S. Slechta, H. Muir, and A. P. Barker, “Rapid molecular detection of inducible macrolide resistance in Mycobacterium chelonae and M. abscessus strains: a replacement for 14-day susceptibility testing?” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 1705–1707, 2014.

M.-R. Lee, W.-H. Sheng, C.-C. Hung, C.-J. Yu, L-N. Lee, and P.-R. Hsueh, “Mycobacterium abscessus complex infections in humans,” Emerg Infect Dis, vol. 21, no. 9, pp. 1638–1646, 2015.

D. E. Griffith, T. Aksamit, B. A. Brown-Elliott et al., “An official ATS/IDSA statement: diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of nontuberculous mycobacterial diseases,” American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, vol. 175, no. 4, pp. 367–416, 2007.

E. Tortoli, T. Fedrizzi, C. J. Meehan et al., “The new phylogeny of the genus Mycobacterium: the old and the news,” Infection, Genetics and Evolution, vol. 56, pp. 19–25, 2017.

R. J. Langlet and D. Urquhart, “Macrolides and Mycobacterium abscessus: a good idea?” International Journal of Mycobacteriology, vol. 7, no. 4, p. 394, 2018.

P. Ananta, I. Kham-ngam, P. Chetchotisakd et al., “Analysis of drug-susceptibility patterns and gene sequences associated with clarithromycin and amikacin resistance in serial Mycobacterium abscessus isolates from clinical specimens from North East Thailand,” PLoS-One, vol. 13, no. 11, Article ID e0208053, 2018.

Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute, Performance Standards for Susceptibility Testing of Mycobacteria, Nocardia ssp., and other Aerobic Actinomycetes. M-26, Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute, Philadelphia, PA, USA, 3rd edition, 2018.

F. Mougari, R. Amarsy, N. Veziris et al., “Standardized interpretation of antibiotic susceptibility testing and resistance genotyping for Mycobacterium abscessus with regard to subspecies and erm41 sequevar,” Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, vol. 71, no. 8, pp. 2208–2212, 2016.