Case Reports in Neurological Medicine

Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 672314, 6 pages

http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/672314

Case Report

The Middle Fossa Approach for the Removal of a Trochlear Schwannoma

Andrew B. Boucher¹ and L. Madison Michael II2,3

¹College of Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, 910 Madison, Suite 1002, Memphis, TN 38163, USA

²Department of Neurosurgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, 847 Monroe Avenue, Suite 427, Memphis, TN 38163, USA

³Semmes-Murphey Neurologic & Spine Institute, 6325 Humphreys Boulevard, Memphis, TN 38120, USA

Received 13 January 2014; Accepted 16 February 2014; Published 12 March 2014

Academic Editors: P. Sandroni and M. Toft

Copyright © 2014 Andrew B. Boucher and L. Madison Michael II. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

Objectives. Schwannomas originating from the trochlear nerve are extremely rare; only 30 cases have been reported in the literature. Many operative approaches have been utilized for lesion resection, but the advantages of the anterior transpetrosal approach are numerous and include excellent exposure, minimal extradural retraction of the temporal lobe, and minimal cerebrospinal fluid leaks. We report the second case of a trochlear schwannoma resected via the anterior transpetrosal approach. Setting. A 64-year-old male presented with 3-month history of diplopia and headaches. On physical examination, he was found to have a right fourth nerve palsy. Brain magnetic resonance imaging revealed a mass within the right ambient cistern compressing the adjacent midbrain. A right-sided anterior transpetrosal approach was used—which confirmed that the trochlear nerve entered the mass—to achieve gross total resection. Pathological examination confirmed diagnosis of schwannoma. The patient was discharged on postoperative day 3. He experienced a persistent fourth nerve palsy postoperatively with an otherwise normal neurological examination. Follow-up imaging confirmed complete removal of the tumor. Conclusion. The anterior transpetrosal approach is an excellent approach for removal of trochlear schwannomas involving the cisternal course of the trochlear nerve. It affords complete visualization of this anatomical region while introducing minimal morbidity.

1. Introduction

Schwannomas originating from cranial nerves account for 8% of intracranial neoplasms. The vast majority of these tumors arise from the sensory cranial nerves, most commonly, the vestibular or trigeminal nerve [1–3]. Schwannomas that originate from purely motor cranial nerves in patients without neurofibromatosis are uncommon. Of these, trochlear nerve schwannomas are exceedingly rare; to date, there have been only 30 reported cases of surgically confirmed trochlear nerve schwannomas [2–28].

Tumors arising from the trochlear nerve can present a surgical challenge because they often involve the cisternal region near the brainstem [16]. The most common approach used to resect these tumors has been the subtemporal transtentorial approach [16]. But the disadvantages of intradural approaches include retraction injury and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak. The extradural anterior transpetrosal approach is ideal for trochlear schwannomas involving the cisternal portion. It affords excellent visualization of the epicenter of the lesion. Progressive enfolding of the tumor capsule into the surgical opening allows for a radical resection. Other benefits of the anterior transpetrosal approach include minimal temporal lobe retraction, avoidance of vital structures, and minimal CSF leakage. One previously published case employed the anterior transpetrosal approach for resection of a trochlear schwannoma. This case is the second one reported in the literature in which an extradural anterior petrosal approach was used in the resection of a trochlear schwannoma.

2. Case Report

2.1. History and Examination

A 64-year-old white male with an unremarkable past medical history presented with acute-onset diplopia. His symptoms began 2 months prior to his initial neurosurgical evaluation. There was no obvious history of trauma. The patient reported that his double vision was exacerbated by looking down and was improved when tilting his head to the left. He also was experiencing significant right frontal headaches that worsened throughout the day. On physical examination, he was found to have diplopia on downward gaze to the right, which suggested a right-sided trochlear nerve palsy with no other focal neurological deficits. The remainder of his neurological exam was unremarkable.

2.2. Imaging

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain with and without contrast revealed a well-circumscribed, heterogeneously enhancing space-occupying lesion in the right ambient cistern. The mass measured 9 mm × 7 mm × 11 mm and compressed the adjacent anterior aspect of the upper pons. It appeared to have a broad base with a thin enhancing tail extending inferolaterally along the meninges (Figures 1(a) and 1(b)) [1–3].

(a)

(b)

Figure 1: Preoperative MRI brain with contrast axial (a) and coronal T1-weighted (b) images reveals a well-circumscribed, heterogeneously enhancing lesion adjacent to the right side of the upper pons.

2.3. Operation

The patient was transferred to the operative table and placed in the lateral decubitus position. A lumbar drain was placed at this time. His head was placed in a Mayfield 3-point fixation system, which was aligned to maximally expose the right temporal region. The operative site was prepped and draped in the usual sterile fashion. A curvilinear incision was made overlying the right temporal region that began approximately 1.5 cm anterior to the external auditory canal and was carried superiorly to the superior temporal line. It was then carried posteriorly approximately 5 cm. The skin flap was rotated inferiorly and posteriorly and affixed into place with hooks. The temporalis muscle was mobilized anteriorly. This exposed the right temporal region. An electric drill was taken, and a right temporal craniotomy was elevated and the microscope was moved into the field.

Approximately 20 mL of CSF was removed from the lumbar drain at this time to promote brain relaxation. An extradural subtemporal dissection ensued. Dissection continued medially and the greater superficial petrosal nerve was identified. Dissection continued medially until Meckel’s cave was identified extradurally. Anteriorly, the middle meningeal artery was seen coursing through the foramen spinosum and posteriorly was the superior petrosal sinus.

A middle fossa retractor was inserted and extradural elevation of the right temporal lobe was performed. Careful attention was paid to avoid excessive retraction of the temporal lobe. An anterior petrosectomy was performed as originally described by Kawase et al. [29, 30]. The superior petrosal sinus was cauterized laterally. An incision was made beginning along the temporal dura and carried through the superior petrosal sinus and into the posterior fossa. This allowed identification of the 5th nerve at the nerve root entry zone. The tentorium was cut medially, and the dura overlying Meckel’s cave was removed resulting in excellent visualization of the tentorial incisura region. A large mass was clearly identified at this time; the trochlear nerve appeared to enter directly into the lesion (Figure 2). The capsule was cauterized and incised. Multiple specimens were sent for pathological analysis, and the pathology of the specimens was consistent with a schwannoma. The trochlear nerve was now cut proximally to allow further mobilization of the mass. Following intratumoral debulking, progressive mobilization of the capsule resulted in a gross total resection. The retractor was removed, the wound was closed in a multilayer fashion, and a dressing was applied.

Figure 2: The trochlear nerve entering directly into the visualized tumor.

2.4. Postoperative Course

The patient had an uneventful postoperative course and was discharged to home on postoperative day 3. As expected, the patient continued to experience diplopia with downward gaze. At 1-month followup, the patient had recovered well from the surgery with no complaints. The right trochlear nerve palsy persisted as anticipated. Followup MRI of the brain performed 6 months postoperatively revealed no evidence of residual disease (Figures 3(a) and 3(b)).

(a)

(b)

Figure 3: Postoperative MRI brain with contrast axial (a) and coronal (b) T1-weighted images reveals complete resection of the trochlear schwannoma.

3. Discussion

Nonvestibular cranial nerve schwannomas are extremely uncommon. Of these, trigeminal schwannomas are the most common but only account for up to 8% of intracranial schwannomas [31]. Trochlear schwannomas are extremely rare as this case represents just the 32nd reported case that was surgically confirmed (Table 1). Trochlear schwannomas arise mostly in middle-aged patients with an average age of 46 years old, although they have been described in patients as young as 16 years old (Table 1). Trochlear schwannomas may have a variety of presentations ranging from isolated trochlear nerve palsy—as in this case—to hemiparesis, cerebellar signs, or other cranial nerve deficits [16]. Trochlear nerve palsy has only been seen in about half of the surgically confirmed trochlear schwannomas [3, 16]. It has been proposed that due to the cisternal length of the fourth nerve, the tumor may displace and twist the nerve fibers instead of destroying them, which could account for the absence or later presentation of trochlear paralysis in these cases [25]. In our present case, the diplopia was the only presenting symptom, other than headache, suggesting that trochlear schwannomas may present with an isolated trochlear palsy. As a general rule, resection of the trochlear schwannoma entails sacrificing the trochlear nerve, which results in a permanent fourth nerve palsy. However, there has been one recent exception reported in which partial resection resulted in improvement of diplopia [5].

Table 1: Prior Surgically-Defined Trochlear Schwannomas.

Author
Year
Age/Sex
Location
Approach

King [15]
1976
55/F
Ambient Cistern
Subtemporal transtentorial

Boggan et al. [7]
1979
32/F
Ambient Cistern
Subtemporal transtentorial

Leunda et al. [2]
1982
54/M
Ambient Cistern
Subtemporal transtentorial

Leunda et al. [2]
1982
16/F
Cisternocavernous
Subtemporal transtentorial

Yamamoto et al. [27]
1987
37/F
Ambient Cistern
Subtemporal transtentorial

Garen et al. [11]
1987
18/F
Ambient Cistern
Subtemporal transtentorial

Tokuriki et al. [24]
1988
43/M
Ambient Cistern
Subtemporal transtentorial

Maurice-Williams [18]
1989
56/M
Ambient Cistern
Suboccipital, CP angle approach

Samii et al. [20]
1989
53/F
Ambient Cistern
Pterional

Celli et al. [8]
1992
51/M
Ambient Cistern
Subtemporal transtentorial

Jackowski et al. [14]
1994
26/F
Ambient Cistern
Transtemporal with partial division of tentorium

Abe et al. [4]
1994
60/M
Ambient Cistern
Lateral Suboccipital

Abe et al. [4]
1994
57/M
Ambient Cistern
Subtemporal transtentorial

Dolenc and Coscia [9]
1996
68/M
Ambient Cistern
Lateral suboccipital

Beppu et al. [6]
1997
66/M
Ambient Cistern
Lateral suboccipital

Santoreneos et al. [21]
1997
35/F
Ambient Cistern
Subtemporal with partial division of tentorium

Nadkarni and Goel [19]
1999
48/F
Ambient Cistern
Subtemporal transtentorial

Matsui et al. [17]
2002
61/M
Ambient Cistern
Presigmoid transpetrosal

Veshchev et al. [26]
2002
26/F
Cavernous Sinus
Pterional

Türe et al. [25]
2002
31/M
Ambient Cistern
Infratentorial, lateral supracerebellar

Shenouda et al. [22]
2002
49/M
Cisternocavernous
Presigmoid combined transpetrosal

Du et al. [10]
2003
17/F
Ambient Cistern
Orbitozygomatic pterional

Shenoy and Raja [23]
2004
54/F
Ambient Cistern
Subtemporal transtentorial

Ohba et al. [3]
2006
48/M
Ambient Cistern
Anterior transpetrosal

Gerganov et al. [12]
2007
52/F
Ambient Cistern
Retrosigmoid

Grigorian and Korobova [13]
2008
47/F
Ambient Cistern
Retromastoidal

Grigorian and Korobova [13]
2008
44/F
Ambient Cistern
Paramedian subtentorial supracerebellar

Kohama et al. [16]
2009
47/F
Ambient Cistern
Posterior transpetrosal

Bartalena et al. [5]
2010
50/F
Ambient Cistern
Subtemporal transtentorial

Younes et al. [28]
2012
65/F
Ambient Cistern
Pterional

Boucher and Michael (current study)
2013
64/M
Ambient Cistern
Anterior transpetrosal

The approach for gross resection of trochlear schwannomas should be based on the size and location of the tumor. The size can vary, but symptomatic tumors that were previously resected ranged from 10 to 45 mm [3]. The vast majority of these tumors arise from the cisternal portion of the fourth nerve (Table 1). This location can pose a challenge due to the morbidities associated with the different surgical approaches needed to reach this region. In the past, the subtemporal transtentorial approach with minor variations has been the most common approach used to resect these tumors (Table 1). Other intradural approaches—including pterional, suboccipital, and presigmoid transpetrosal—have been employed to resect trochlear schwannomas. However, these intradural approaches have increased risk of morbidity due to the greater temporal lobe retraction and increased risk of CSF leaks as compared with the extradural approach used in this case.

We utilized the extended middle fossa approach, also known as the anterior transpetrosal approach, in the gross total resection of the trochlear schwannoma. Kawase et al. first described this approach in 1985 for basilar artery aneurysms and later for the resection of sphenopetroclival meningiomas in 1991 [29, 30]. This approach offers many theoretical advantages over the other options used for resection of trochlear schwannomas, such as great exposure to the petroclival region, which allows for complete resection. With their typical soft consistency, trochlear schwannomas may be easily resected from the cisternal region, which is optimally visualized via the anterior transpetrosal approach.

While the subtemporal transtentorial approach also allows for adequate visualization of the surgical field, this approach potentially involves more temporal lobe retraction than the middle fossa approach. The increased traction increases the likelihood of morbidity due to damage of the temporal lobe. Another potential disadvantage of this approach is harm to the vein of Labbe with resultant venous infarction. The lateral suboccipital approach has also been used successfully, but this approach has disadvantages of inadequate exposure if there are significant parasellar portions of the tumor as well as increased risk of damage to the cranial nerves that surround the access route [29]. The other major advantage of the middle fossa approach is the avoidance of CSF leaks as the dissection is extradural. While CSF leaks have still been reported to occur in some cases [32], the likelihood is greatly decreased as compared to intradural approaches.

The main disadvantages of the middle fossa approach are possible inadequate exposure, if the petrosal bone resection is insufficient, possible unintentional entry into the middle ear, and risk to the geniculate ganglion, if there is excessive traction on the greater superficial petrosal nerve [29, 32]. These risks are minimal with careful dissection and adequate knowledge of the anatomy of the middle fossa.

4. Conclusion

The anterior transpetrosal approach is an excellent approach for the resection of trochlear nerve schwannomas. It was used successfully in this patient to achieve gross total resection of this uncommon tumor. The patient retained his isolated right trochlear nerve palsy with no added morbidity. The anterior transpetrosal approach has advantages over other techniques for removal of these rare schwannomas. This approach offers optimal visualization of the petroclival region while introducing minimal morbidity and should be considered as a surgical corridor for removal of trochlear schwannomas with involvement of the ambient cistern.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgment

The authors received no financial support. The authors also wish to thank Andrew J. Gienapp for technical and copy editing, preparation of the paper and figures for publishing, and publication assistance with this paper.

References

P. C. Burger, B. W. Scheithauer, Armed Forces Institute of Pathology (US), and Universities Associated for Research and Education in Pathology, Tumors of the Central Nervous System, vol. 10, Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, Washington, DC, USA, 1994.

G. Leunda, J. Vaquero, and J. Cabezudo, “Schwannoma of the oculomotor nerves. Report of four cases,” Journal of Neurosurgery, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 563–565, 1982.

S. Ohba, T. Miwa, and T. Kawase, “Trochlear nerve schwannoma with intratumoral hemorrhage: case report,” Neurosurgery, vol. 58, article E791, 2006.

T. Abe, T. Iwata, M. Shimazu et al., “Two cases of trochlear nerve neurinoma,” Neurological Surgery, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 371–375, 1994.

T. Bartalena, C. Leoni, M. P. Trossello et al., “Hourglass cystic schwannoma of the trochlear nerve,” Acta Bio-Medica, vol. 81, no. 2, pp. 147–150, 2010.

T. Beppu, Y. Yoshida, T. Wada et al., “Trochlear and abducens nerve neurinomas accompanied by a cerebellopontine angle meningioma—case report,” Neurologia Medico-Chirurgica, vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 416–421, 1997.

J. E. Boggan, M. L. Rosenblum, and C. B. Wilson, “Neurilemmoma of the fourth cranial nerve. Case report,” Journal of Neurosurgery, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 519–521, 1979.

P. Celli, L. Ferrante, M. Acqui, L. Mastronardi, A. Fortuna, and L. Palma, “Neurinoma of the third, fourth, and sixth cranial nerves: a survey and report of a new fourth nerve case,” Surgical Neurology, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 216–224, 1992.

V. V. Dolenc and S. Coscia, “Cystic trochlear nerve neurinoma,” British Journal of Neurosurgery, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 593–597, 1996.

R. Du, J. Dhoot, M. W. McDermott, and N. Gupta, “Cystic schwannoma of the anterior tentorial hiatus: case report and review of the literature,” Pediatric Neurosurgery, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 167–173, 2003.

P. D. Garen, C. G. Harper, C. Teo, and I. H. Johnston, “Cystic schwannoma of the trochlear nerve mimicking a brain-stem tumor. Case report,” Journal of Neurosurgery, vol. 67, no. 6, pp. 928–930, 1987.

V. Gerganov, S. Amir, A. Koerbel, A. Brandes, A. Stan, and S. Madjid, “Cystic trochlear nerve schwannoma. Case report,” Surgical Neurology, vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 221–225, 2007.

I. A. Grigorian and A. N. Korobova, “Neurinomas of the trochlear nerve,” Zhurnal Voprosy neǐrokhirurgii Imeni N. N. Burdenko, vol. 1, pp. 50–52, 2008.

A. Jackowski, G. Weiner, and G. O'Reilly, “Trochlear nerve schwannomas,” British Journal of Neurosurgery, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 219–223, 1994.

J. S. King, “Trochlear nerve sheath tumor: case report,” Journal of Neurosurgery, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 245–247, 1976.

M. Kohama, K. Murakami, T. Endo, M. Watanabe, and T. Tominaga, “Surgical and histological observations of trochlear neurinoma—case report,” Neurologia Medico-Chirurgica, vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 217–220, 2009.

T. Matsui, E. Morikawa, T. Morimoto, and T. Asano, “Presigmoid transpetrosal approach for the treatment of a large trochlear nerve schwannoma,” Neurologia Medico-Chirurgica, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 31–35, 2002.

R. S. Maurice-Williams, “Isolated schwannoma of the fourth cranial nerve: case report,” Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, vol. 52, no. 12, pp. 1442–1443, 1989.

T. D. Nadkarni and A. Goel, “Trochlear nerve neurinoma presenting as pathological laughter,” British Journal of Neurosurgery, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 212–213, 1999.

M. Samii, W. Draf, and J. Lang, Surgery of the Skull Base: An Interdisciplinary Approach, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1989.

S. Santoreneos, A. Hanieh, and R. E. Jorgensen, “Trochlear nerve schwannomas occurring in patients without neurofibromatosis: case report and review of the literature,” Neurosurgery, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 282–287, 1997.

E. F. Shenouda, A. Ghosh, and H. B. Coakham, “Trochlear nerve schwannoma removed by combined petrosal approach,” British Journal of Neurosurgery, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 600–604, 2002.

S. N. Shenoy and A. Raja, “Cystic trochlear nerve neurinoma mimicking intrinsic brainstem tumour,” British Journal of Neurosurgery, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 183–186, 2004.

Y. Tokuriki, J. Yamashita, H. Kikuchi, R. Asato, and H. Handa, “Trochlear nerve neurinoma. Case report,” Neurologia Medico-Chirurgica, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 70–73, 1988.

U. Türe, K. Ozduman, I. Elmaci, and M. Necmettin Pamir, “Infratentorial lateral supracerebellar approach for trochlear nerve schwannoma,” Journal of Clinical Neuroscience, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 595–598, 2002.

I. Veshchev, S. Spektor, M. Gazi Yaşargil et al., “Trochlear nerve neuroma manifested with intractable atypical facial pain: case report,” Neurosurgery, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 889–892, 2002.

M. Yamamoto, M. Jimbo, and E. Takara, “Trochlear neurinoma: case report,” Neurological Surgery, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 493–497, 1984.

W. M. Younes, E. J. Hermann, and J. K. Krauss, “Cisternal trochlear nerve schwannoma: improvement of diplopia after subtotal tumour excision,” British Journal of Neurosurgery, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 107–109, 2012.

T. Kawase, R. Shiobara, and S. Toya, “Anterior transpetrosal-transtentorial approach for sphenopetroclival meningiomas: surgical method and results in 10 patients,” Neurosurgery, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 869–876, 1991.

T. Kawase, S. Toya, R. Shiobara, and T. Mine, “Transpetrosal approach for aneurysms of the lower basilar artery,” Journal of Neurosurgery, vol. 63, no. 6, pp. 857–861, 1985.

M. Elsharkawy, Z. Xu, D. Schlesinger, and J. P. Sheehan, “Gamma Knife surgery for nonvestibular schwannomas: radiological and clinical outcomes: clinical article,” Journal of Neurosurgery, vol. 116, no. 1, pp. 66–72, 2012.

J. D. Day, “The middle fossa approach and extended middle fossa approach: technique and operative nuances,” Neurosurgery, vol. 70, pp. 192–201, 2012.