Case Reports in Surgery

Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 808624, 2 pages

http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/808624

Case Report

Gossypiboma after Breast Augmentation

Kira Lundin, Julie E. Allen, and Lene Birk-Soerensen

Department of Plastic Surgery, Aalborg University Hospital, Soendre Skovvej 3, 9000 Aalborg, Denmark

Received 17 December 2012; Accepted 10 January 2013

Academic Editors: S. Balasubramanian, P. De Nardi, S.-i. Kosugi, and S. Landen

Copyright © 2013 Kira Lundin et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

A 39-year-old woman was referred for removal of cosmetic breast implants and related siliconoma. After an exchange of breast implants at a private clinic a year previously, she had asymmetry of the right breast, persistent pain, and a generally unacceptable cosmetic result. An MRI had shown a well-defined area with spots of silicone-like material at the upper pole of the right breast. Surgical removal of presumed silicone-imbibed breast tissue was undertaken, and surprisingly a gossypiboma was found in its place, which had not been identified on the MRI. Gossypiboma is the condition of an accidentally retained surgical sponge. This complication is also known as a textiloma, gauzoma, or muslinoma and is well described in other surgical specialties. However, it is extremely rare after plastic surgery, and this case illustrates the need for continued attention to the surgical count of sponges and instruments.

1. Case

A 39-year-old woman was referred for removal of breast implants because of persistent pain and an unacceptable cosmetic result. The patient had a history of thrombophilia but was otherwise healthy and had a BMI within normal range.

Twelve months before admission to our department, the patient had had breast implants changed at a private clinic, apparently because of implant rupture. The original augmentation was performed 9 years ago for cosmetic reasons. After the second procedure, the patient suffered from pain and intermittent swelling as well as a hard consistency and change of contour of the right breast.

An ultrasound and mammography had showen no sign of malignant disease. An MRI scan 6 months after the last operation showed a well-defined area dotted with small spots of silicone-like material as seen in Figure 1. It was concluded that the assumed silicone could be remnants from the original breast implants which had been exchanged for new.

Figure 1: MRI scan showing the gossypiboma (small arrow) as a well-defined area dotted with silicone-like material above the breast implant (large arrow) on the right side, corresponding to the area where the patient felt a painful lump. The implant in the left breast is not visible in this slide.

The patient was referred to our department by her local GP, and an indication was found for removal of both implants in the public healthcare system, as the private clinic had recently closed.

During surgery, both implants were removed and found to be intact. The irregular lump was believed to be silicone-imbibed breast tissue due to a previous implant rupture that was lodged in the capsule, and upon dissection of this, a retained surgical sponge was identified, as shown in Figure 2. There was no apparent radioopaque marker in the sponge.

Figure 2: Perioperative photograph of retained surgical sponge embedded in the fibrous capsule in the upper pole of the right breast.

The postoperative course was uneventful and the patient’s symptoms of discomfort disappeared within 2 weeks. It is not known whether a surgical count of sponges and instruments was performed during the patient’s second operation one year previously.

2. Discussion

The term gossypiboma is derived from the Latin word “gossypium” meaning cotton. The condition is also known as a retained surgical sponge, a textiloma, gauzoma, or muslinoma. The incidence of gossypiboma has been described as 1 : 5000–1 : 19.000 procedures in other surgical specialties but is likely to be significantly underreported [1, 2]. Gossypibomas related to plastic surgery procedures appear to be extremely rare and have only been described a few times previously [3–7].

Adherence to guidelines regarding surgical count of sponges and instruments is mandatory, and continued vigilance must be observed. It is the duty of both the surgeon and the assisting nurse to ensure a correct surgical count. In the regrettable event of a retained foreign object after surgery, it is important to secure documentation and to be of assistance with respect to the medicolegal aspects. We would recommend that all surgical sponges contain a radio-opaque marker to facilitate identification.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

References

C. C. Greenberg, S. E. Regenbogen, S. R. Lipsitz, R. Diaz-Flores, and A. A. Gawande, “The frequency and significance of discrepancies in the surgical count,” Annals of Surgery, vol. 248, no. 2, pp. 337–341, 2008.

W. Wan, T. Le, L. Riskin, and A. Macario, “Improving safety in the operating room: a systematic literature review of retained surgical sponges,” Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 207–214, 2009.

S. Y. Song, J. W. Hong, W. M. Yoo, and K. C. Tark, “Gossypiboma after mandibular contouring surgery,” Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 1607–1610, 2009.

T. L. Huston and R. T. Grant, “Abdominal wall gossypiboma,” Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, vol. 63, no. 5, pp. e463–e464, 2010.

S. Kul and G. Güness, “Gossypiboma of the breast: imaging findings,” Journal of Radiology Case Reports, vol. 4, no. 10, pp. 21–25, 2010.

F. Ahmed, M. C. Swan, M. Flynn, and E. P. Tiernan, “Retained VAC therapy sponge as a complication of abdominoplasty,” Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, vol. 63, no. 5, pp. e497–e499, 2010.

M. Sarrabayrouse, H. F. Mayer, and H. D. Loustau, “Gauzoma mimicking siliconoma after breast augmentation surgery,” Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 692–694, 2008.