Case Reports in Transplantation
Volume 2020 (2020), Article ID 5023948, 8 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/5023948

Case Series

Pneumatosis Intestinalis in Adult Bilateral Lung Transplant Patients: A Single Institution Experience and Literature Review

Eric Christiansen,¹ Nisha Singh,² Amy Trahan,¹ Sofya Tokman,³ David Row,⁴ and Olga Kalinkin¹

¹Department of Radiology, St. Joseph’s Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ, USA
²Department of Medicine, St. Joseph’s Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ, USA
³Norton Thoracic Institute, St. Joseph’s Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ, USA
⁴Department of Surgery, St. Joseph’s Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ, USA

Correspondence should be addressed to Eric Christiansen; chri2408@umn.edu

Received 2 March 2020; Revised 20 May 2020; Accepted 27 May 2020; Published 13 July 2020

Academic Editor: Ryszard Grenda

Copyright © 2020 Eric Christiansen et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

Pneumatosis intestinalis (PI) is a radiologic finding which is characterized by the accumulation of gas within the bowel wall. This radiologic finding is traditionally thought of in the sense of intestinal ischemia. An uncommon cause of this finding is post organ transplantation. We did an institutional and literature review of this finding to demonstrate its distinct imaging features and benign nature. It was observed to occur in approximately 5.2% of patients post lung transplant (23/442). On imaging, it displays an expansile/bubbly appearance of gas within the bowel wall that is distinct from the traditional findings seen in intestinal ischemia. Clinical review showed that posttransplant patients with PI can be successfully managed conservatively with early enteral nutrition, oxygen, antibiotics, and limited follow-up imaging. With the increasing use of organ transplantation, PI is being diagnosed with increased frequency. It is important to let clinicians know of this entity and its potential outcomes.

1. Introduction

Pneumatosis intestinalis (PI) is a radiologic and pathologic finding which is defined as accumulation of gas within the submucosa or subserosa of the small or large bowel [1]. PI was first reported by Du Vernoi in 1730 during cadaveric dissection [2]. It is a clinical condition with a wide spectrum of etiologies and outcomes, ranging from completely benign to life threatening. PI is most commonly thought of in critical scenarios such as intestinal ischemia, necrotizing enterocolitis, mesenteric vascular disease, and intestinal obstruction [3]. Benign PI is a less common entity, usually found incidentally on plain radiograph or CT and is typically seen in conditions related to chronic immunosuppression such as solid organ transplant and graft vs. host disease (GVHD), as well as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), asthma, scleroderma, or as a complication of endoscopy [4].

Pneumoperitoneum, mesenteric gas, and portal venous gas are additional imaging findings often seen in the setting of PI that have not been proven to correlate with severity of disease [5]. Pneumatosis intestinalis associated with solid organ transplantation poses a unique challenge since these patients have recently undergone an extensive operation and are on high-dose immunosuppression; thus, they may be poor surgical candidates. There have been a number of case reports of benign PI in the setting of lung transplant over the years, including two more recent small case series, Thompson et al. with 7 patients and Chandola et al. with 10 patients, which demonstrated this to be a benign entity that can be managed conservatively [5, 6].

2. Methodology

A thorough departmental review was performed using Montage, which was queried for patients who underwent lung transplant and subsequently developed pneumatosis intestinalis. Between March 2015 and June 2019, there were 442 lung transplants performed with 23 patients also having PI diagnosed on CT. These patients had CT scans to evaluate the extent of pneumatosis after it was incidentally found on a plain chest radiograph. Each of the scans was individually analyzed by a radiologist for additional findings and characterization of the PI. Systemic review of clinical notes and electronic medical records was performed in order to collect information on patient demographics, clinical course, hospital stay, laboratory values, medications, and any interventions.

3. Results

From March 2015 to June 2019, 442 lung transplants were performed in which 23 adults were observed to incidentally develop PI (5.2%, Table 1). There were 13 men and 9 women with mean age of 62 years (range, 37-79 y). The primary diagnosis and reason for lung transplant was pulmonary fibrosis (), scleroderma-related interstitial lung disease (), sarcoidosis () and alpha-1 antitrypsin-related COPD (). Mean time to development of PI post lung transplant was 168 days, range 5 to 1477 days, and median of 47 days. Placement of gastrojejunostomy (GJ) tube after transplant and before development of PI was seen in 19 patients (83%). The mean time from placement of the GJ tube to development of PI was 66 days, range 3 to 519 days, and median of 37 days.

Table 1: PI data.

Patient
Age, sex
Primary diagnosis
Time to PI after Tx
Time to PI after GJ tube
Immunosuppression
Symptoms
PI distribution
Pneumoperitoneum
Mesenteric gas
Portal venous gas
Lactic acid
Amylase
Bicarbonate
Follow-up imaging
Management

1
58, M
Sarcoidosis
23
11
P+T+MMF
Abdominal pain, diarrhea
C/A
Y
Y
N
23.5
45
28

O₂ at 15 L Vancomycin, Zosyn, Micafungin

2
43, M
IPF
47
43
P+T+MMF
None
C/A/T/D
N
N
N
1.9

23

O₂ at 15 L Flagyl, Merrem

3
71, F
IPF
53
3
P+T+MMF

C/A/T
N
N
N
1.4

29

O₂ at 15 L Flagyl

4
66, F
Sarcoidosis
36
4
P+T+MMF+IVIG

A/T
Y
N
N
1.6
31
23
None
OR for ex lap O₂ at 15 L (negative)

5
67, F
IPF
517
519
P+T+MMF
Diarrhea
A
Y
N
N
0.7
17
25

O₂ at 15 L

6
66, F
IPF
147

P+T+MMF

C/A
N
N
N
1.1

23

O₂ at 15 L

7
64, M
IPF
8
10
P+T+MMF
Diarrhea
C/A
N
Y
Y

29

O₂ at 15 L

8
59, M
Scleroderma ILD
5

P+T+MMF
None
C
Y
Y
N

37

OR surgery—cecal ischemia and perforation and closed loop large bowel obstruction

9
69, F
Scleroderma ILD
41
45
P+T+MMF

C/A/T
Y
Y
N
2.2
90
23

Flagyl O₂ at 15 L

10
37, F
Scleroderma ILD
28
38
P+T+MMF
None
C/A/T/D
Y
Y
N
0.9

24

O₂ at 15 L

11
79, M
IPF
375

P+T+MMF
None
C/A
Y
N
N
2
39
23

O₂ at 15 L

12
54, F
IPF
28
37
P+T+MMF
None
C/A/T/D
Y
Y
N
1.6

26

Flagyl O₂ at 15 L Switched TF to Vivonex

13
71, M
IPF
209
10
P+T+MMF

C
N
N
Y
1.6

28

Flagyl O₂ at 15 L

14
61, F
Scleroderma ILD
47
53
P+T+MMF
None
C/A/T
Y
Y
N
2.6

24

O₂ at 15 L Zosyn

15
73, M
CPFE
37
45
P+T+MMF
Diarrhea
C/A/T
Y
Y
N
3.3
74
28

O₂ at 15 L Flagyl/Vancomycin (C. diff)

16
61, M
IPF
63
21
P+T+MMF
Diarrhea
C/A/T/D
Y
Y
N
1.8
38
25

Switch TF to elemental Flagyl, Florastor O₂ at 15 L

17
59, F
IPF
234
193
P+T+MMF
None
C/A/T/D
N
N
N
0.5

24
None
Patient seen in ED after outside X-ray showing PI, discharged from ED

18
43, M
IPF
200
108
P+T+MMF
None
A/T
Y
Y
N
1.8
34
25

Switch TF to elemental O₂ at 15 L Flagyl

19
71, M
IPF
24
13
P+T+MMF
None
C
Y
N
N
1.5

26
None
Treated outpatient

20
58, M
A1AT
17
28
P+T+MMF
Diarrhea
C/A/T/D
Y
Y
N
0.6
120
30

Flagyl O₂ at 15 L

21
55, M
IPF
1477
30
P+T
None
C/A
N
Y
N
1.5
23
36

O₂ at 15 L

22
69, M
IPF
51
39
P+T+MMF
None
C/A/T
Y
Y
N
0.8
40
29
None

O₂ at 15 L

23
62, M
IPF
202

P+T+MMF

C/A/T
N
N
N
1

22

O₂ at 15 L

Note: IPF: interstitial pulmonary fibrosis; P: prednisone; T: tacrolimus; MMF: mycophenolate mofetil; C/A/T/D: cecum/ascending/transverse/descending colon.

Distribution of PI was observed with involvement of the cecum in 78% (), ascending colon in 87% (), transverse colon in 57% (), and descending colon in 26% (). Pneumoperitoneum was seen in 65% () of cases, and mesenteric gas in 57% (). Portal venous gas was only seen in 2 cases (7%).

The majority of lung transplant recipients with PI were managed conservatively with a combination of bowel rest, supplemental oxygen, and antibiotics. Patients remained nil per os (NPO) for an average of 1.1 days after diagnosis (range, 0-4). Diet was typically advanced by starting out with a clear liquid diet or tube feeds depending on the patient, which progressed daily as symptoms improved until their goal nutrition was achieved. Management varied based on admitting provider and was noted to become more standardized in recent years. Of the 21 subjects who were treated as inpatients, 100% were treated with high flow oxygen typically at 15 L, 52% were administered Flagyl, and 2 patients (9%) ended up requiring surgery. Almost all patients were on antibiotic coverage; however, we specifically looked at Flagyl due to its documented use in the literature in these patients. Improvement of PI is typically assessed radiographically with either an abdominal X-ray or an abdominal CT scan. The colorectal surgery (CRS) service is typically consulted for GI-related issues with all transplant patients. The average length of CRS involvement in patients with PI is 3.5 days (range, 0-16); they typically stay involved with patient care until GI symptoms have resolved and the patient is tolerating a diet. Follow-up imaging was also assessed; of the 23 patients, 19 patients received follow-up radiographs (83%), while 3 patients received follow-up CT scans (13%). On average, patients had 3.5 abdominal X-rays (range, 0-9) and 0.2 abdominal CTs (range, 0-2).

Pneumatosis intestinalis was asymptomatic in the majority of patients (12, 57%). Eleven patients complained of gastrointestinal symptoms with 10 reporting nausea and diarrhea and only 2 reporting abdominal pain. Notably, diarrhea and nausea were long standing in many of these patients and likely preceded the development of PI.

There are several laboratory values that can help predict prognosis in patients with PI [3]. These include a (mmol/L), (mEq/L), (U/L), and [3]. In this cohort, the mean lactic acid level was 1.3 mmol/L (range, 2.0-3.3) with 5 patients having a level above 2.0 mmol/L. Mean serum bicarbonate was 26.5 mEq/L, and all patients had a (range, 22-37). None of the patients had an amylase above 200 U/L with mean serum amylase being 50.6 U/L (range, 17-90). The serum pH was assessed in only 3 patients and ranged from 7.47 to 7.49.

As part of the pretransplant work-up, all patients received a colonoscopy prior to their procedure. Based on the colonoscopy reports, we specifically analyzed the findings involving the ascending and transverse colon looking for any predisposing factors for the development of pneumatosis. Three patients had polyps discovered in the ascending colon; pathology revealed these to be tubular adenomas without high-grade dysplasia. Two patients had diverticula involving the ascending colon without active inflammation, while one patient had active colitis of the ascending colon. All other patients had normal colonoscopy findings.

All lung transplant recipients were immunosuppressed at the time of PI diagnosis, and all were taking prophylactic antimicrobials. The vast majority (22, 96%) were taking a combination of corticosteroids (prednisone), calcineurin inhibitors (tacrolimus), and antiproliferative agents (mycophenolate mofetil). One patient was on 2 types of drug immunosuppression consisting of tacrolimus and prednisone alone. All the patients took valganciclovir for cytomegalovirus prophylaxis, 22 took an azole antifungal for fungal prophylaxis (as coccidioidomycosis is ubiquitous in the southwest of the United States), and 19 took trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for pneumocystis pneumonia prophylaxis. There are numerous other antibiotics that only 1 or 2 patients were on, typically for targeting a specific bacterium or due to medication allergies; this list included Ampicillin, Nystatin, Itraconazole, CMV immunoglobulin, Meropenem, Daptomycin, Vancomycin, Micafungin, Piperacillin-Tazobactam, and Atovaquone. All 23 patients tested negative for cytomegalovirus posttransplantation.

4. Discussion

Although the mechanism of PI in lung transplant recipients remains uncertain, 3 major theories have been put forth and include the mechanical, the bacterial, and the biochemical [1, 7].The mechanical theory postulates that gas dissects into the bowel wall from increased intraluminal pressure or from increased mediastinal pressure in mechanically ventilated patients via the mediastinum. The bacterial theory suggests that gas-forming bacteria enter the submucosa through mucosal rents and produce gas within the bowel wall, while the biochemical theory suggests that carbohydrates are broken down by bacteria resulting in gas production which is then absorbed into the bowel wall. Notably, there is also a less well-known theory that postulates that PI results from immunosuppression-driven atrophy of the lymphoid tissues within the bowel wall. This atrophy may compromise the integrity of the bowel mucosa and allows gas to dissect into the bowel wall (reference). One additional theory that we wanted to explore was PI forming as a result of feeding tubes; the proposed mechanism being a combination of iatrogenic mucosal injury and increased intraluminal pressures as well as increased bacterial overgrowth in the region of tube feeds [8]. Another common etiology of PI in nontransplant patients is intestinal ischemia; however, due to the nonwatershed distribution and time frame, late postsurgical, seen in our patient population, this does not appear to be a potential etiology.

There are multiple case reports and 2 small case series [5, 6, 9, 10] that have previously been published on PI in the post lung transplant population. Thompson et al. described 6 patients (out of 321, Table 2) with a rate of observation of 2% while Chandola et al. described 10 patients (out of 373, Table 3) with a rate of 2.68% [5, 6]. These are very similar to our rate of observation of 5.2%. However, the true incidence is likely underestimated due to this commonly being an incidental finding in asymptomatic patients. The clinical presentation, radiologic appearance, and clinical outcomes were also similar to ours. Both authors agreed that patients can be managed conservatively in the majority of cases. However, Chandola et al. showed that high serum lactate and portal venous gas were indicative of more severe illness requiring surgical management.

Table 2: Thompson et al. patients.

Patient
Age, sex
Primary diagnosis
Time to PI after Tx
Immunosuppression
Symptoms
PI distribution
Pneumoperitoneum
Lactic acid

1
39, F
Scleroderma ILD
84
P+T+A
Abdominal pain, N/V
C/A/T/D
N
1.3

2
64, M
IPF
453
P+T
Abdominal pain
C/A
Y
1.1

3
51, M
Cystic fibrosis
128
P+T+A
None
C/A/T/D
Y
1

4
55, M
COPD
24
P+T+A
Diarrhea
C/A/T
Y
1.7

5
65, M
IPF
125
P+T+A
None
C/A/T/D
N
1.3

6
22, M
Cystic fibrosis
16
P+T+A
Abdominal pain
C/A
N
1

83
0.7

Note: A: azathioprine.

Table 3: Chandola et al. data.

Patient
Age, sex
Primary diagnosis
Time to PI after Tx
Immunosuppression
Symptoms
PI distribution
Pneumoperitoneum
Portomesenteric gas
Lactic acid

1
56, M
COPD
73
P+T+MM+B
Diarrhea, vomit
A/T/D
N
N

2
59, M
COPD
160
P+T+MM+B
Abdominal pain
C/A/T/D
Y
N
4.1

3
32, F
GVHD
134
P+T+MMF+A+C
Diarrhea
A/T
Y
N
1.1

4
59, M
IPF
19
P+T+MM
Diarrhea
A/T
Y
N
1.2

5
35, F
IPF
63
P+T+MM+B
Abdominal pain
Terminal ileum
N
N
1.7

6
53, F
COPD
5
P+T+MM+B
Distention
A
N
Y
10.5

7
68, M
IPF
90
P+T+MM+B
None
A/T
N
N

8
63, F
IPF
455
P+T+MM+B
None
T
Y
N
1.8

9
42, F
Sarcoidosis
2495
P+T+MM
None
C/A/T
N
N

10
49, M
COPD
34
P+T+MM
None
A/T
Y
N

The mean and median to development of PI after transplant were 168 days and 47 days, respectively (range, 5-1477), in our group of patients. Chandola et al. had a mean time of 352.8 days (median 82 days, range 5-2495 days) and Thompson et al. had a mean time of 152 days (median 105 days, range 18-453 days). Many of our subjects (74%) were outpatients at the time of PI diagnosis. The patients that developed PI while still admitted posttransplant typically occurred later in their stay; the extended admissions were all secondary to other issues and not typically a result of the PI. At our institution, it is common for the transplant team to consult the colorectal surgery (CRS) for pneumatosis intestinalis. The surgical team follows the patients until PI improves radiographically and the patient tolerates enteral nutrition. On average, CRS followed the patients for 3.5 days (range, 0-16).

Imaging findings of pneumatosis intestinalis posttransplant are unique as compared to PI seen in other scenarios such as bowel ischemia. PI in posttransplant patients has a bubble-like/expansile appearance with a significant amount of air within the bowel wall (Figures 1 and 2). In these patients, it is helpful to view the pneumatosis on lung windows in order to properly assess its extent (Figure 3). In contrast, for PI in a patient with intestinal ischemia (Figure 4), imaging findings show more of a thin rim of gas bubbles within the submucosa without the expansile appearance. Although posttransplant PI can appear as a thin layer of gas, it would be unusual for intestinal ischemia to appear as bubble-like/expansile. Thus, if the bubble-like/expansive appearance of PI is seen, it may support a benign etiology and clinical course.

(a)

(b)

(c)

Figure 1: (a) Abdominal radiograph, (b) coronal CT, and (c) axial CT. PI of the ascending and transverse colon with “bubbly/expansile” wall appearance with extensive air cysts in the subserosal and submucosal layers.

(a)

(b)

(c)

Figure 2: (a) Abdominal radiograph, (b) coronal CT, and (c) axial CT. Pneumatosis intestinalis of the ascending and proximal transverse colon displaying circumferential bubbly/expansile appearance of the colon wall. Notice also the presence of subcutaneous emphysema.

(a)

(b)

Figure 3: (a) Lung window and (b) soft tissue window. Viewing the bowel through the lung windows allows the reader to better visualize the compartmentalization of the gas, which is located within the colonic wall.

Figure 4: Pneumatosis intestinal in a patient with intestinal ischemia displaying linear small gas bubbles within the colon wall. Note the prominent wall thickening of the colon with the adjacent inflammatory changes of the mesentery.

Additional imaging findings that can be seen with PI include pneumoperitoneum, mesenteric gas, and portal venous gas. These findings are not unexpected since the gas within the wall can diffuse/spread into the adjacent mesenteric veins and into the portal venous system. It has been noted in the previous case reports that portal venous gas was associated with increased risk of need for surgery [5, 11]. In our study, neither of the 2 patients that had portal venous gas required surgery or an extended hospital stay.

There were 2 patients that did undergo surgery as a result of the PI in our study. The first patient went to the OR on the day of PI diagnosis which was posttransplant day number 32. This patient had normal labs, including lactic acid, and did not have any abdominal pain. The imaging findings were that of bubble-like/expansile PI of the cecum and ascending colon with mesenteric gas and free air. This was in 2015, and an exploratory laparotomy was performed without any findings. In retrospect, this surgery may have been preventable based on current knowledge. At the time, however, the likely benign clinical course of this entity in the posttransplant patient was not known to the on call surgeon, who was concerned that the patient had ischemic bowel. The second patient that underwent surgery underwent an exploratory laparotomy on day 5 posttransplant due to imaging findings of cecal ischemia and perforation secondary to a closed large bowel obstruction. While this patient was posttransplant and the imaging findings displayed pneumatosis intestinalis, they were not the typical findings of posttransplant PI; it lacked the cystic/bubbly wall. Instead, they were clearly a result of another process, which in this case was a closed loop large bowel obstruction.

Based on our experience, patients with a benign abdominal exam and reassuring laboratory analysis can be managed conservatively with supplemental oxygen, bowel rest, and antibiotics. Our data showed that reinitiation of enteral nutrition early in the patient’s admission resulted in decreased hospital stays without adverse effects. The patient’s immunosuppressive regimen was not altered during the treatment of PI.

Our report is limited by its relatively small sample size and lack of a control group. However, this is the largest case series to date describing the presentation and management of lung transplant recipients with PI, and our findings support those of smaller case series.

5. Conclusion

Pneumatosis intestinalis in lung transplant recipients is a benign entity that presents incidentally. This can be managed conservatively with minimal clinical intervention and follow-up imaging. Management of these patients can be accomplished with early feeding, serial abdominal exams, high flow oxygen, and minimal imaging follow-up. It is likely reasonable to treat this subset of patients outside of the hospital without additional care in the proper clinical setting. Radiologic findings that are suggestive of benign etiology include bubbly/expansile appearance of the colon as well as involvement of the cecum/ascending colon. Free intraperitoneal air is not an indication of severity. Overall our findings align with the 2 previous case series reported in this population. Radiologists and clinicians need to be aware of this entity to prevent unnecessary intervention. Based on analysis of our institutional data, one could presume that the most likely etiology for the development of PI in this patient population is immunosuppressants. In addition, the majority of patients who had instrumentation of the GI tract with a feeding tube also developed PI, and this is likely a contributing factor. It seems that in most clinical scenarios, this is a multifactorial process and subject to further study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

References

Y. Heng, M. D. Schuffler, R. C. Haggitt, and C. A. Rohrmann, “Pneumatosis intestinalis: a review,” The American Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 90, no. 10, pp. 1747–1758, 1995.

J. G. Du Vernoi, “Anatomische beobachtung der unter der auberen und innerin haut der gedarme eingeschlossenen,” Luft Phys Med Abhandl Acad Wissensch Petersb, vol. 2, p. 182, 1783.

P. N. Khalil, S. Huber-Wagner, R. Ladurner et al., “Natural history, clinical pattern, and surgical considerations of pneumatosis intestinalis,” European Journal of Medical Research, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 231–239, 2009.

F. Y. Ling, A. M. Zafar, L. F. Angel, and A. L. Mumbower, “Benign pneumatosis intestinalis after bilateral lung transplantation,” BMJ Case Reports, vol. 2015, 2015.

W. M. Thompson, L. Ho, and C. Marroquin, “Pneumatosis intestinalis and pneumoperitoneum after bilateral lung transplantation in adults,” AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 196, no. 3, pp. W273–W279, 2011.

R. Chandola, A. Elhenawy, D. Lien, and B. Laing, “Massive gas under diaphragm after lung transplantation: pneumatosis intestinalis simulating bowel perforation,” The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, vol. 99, no. 2, pp. 687–689, 2015.

V. Gemma, D. Mistrot, D. Row et al., “Pneumatosis intestinalis in solid organ transplant recipients,” Journal of Thoracic Disease, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 1984–1997, 2018.

A. C. Cavalea, R. E. Heidel, B. J. Daley, C. M. Lawson, D. A. Benton, and J. M. McLoughlin, “Pneumatosis intestinalis in patients receiving tube feeds,” American Journal of Surgery, vol. 83, no. 8, pp. 825–831, 2017.

R. Chandola, B. Laing, D. Lien, and J. Mullen, “Pneumatosis intestinalis and its association with lung transplant: Alberta experience,” Experimental and Clinical Transplantation, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 75–80, 2018.

L. M. Ho, E. K. Paulson, and W. M. Thompson, “Pneumatosis intestinalis in the adult: benign to life-threatening causes,” AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 188, no. 6, pp. 1604–1613, 2007.

R. I. Andorsky, “Pneumatosis cystoides intestinalis after organ transplantation,” The American Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 85, no. 2, pp. 189–194, 1990.