Canadian Respiratory Journal
Volume 2019 (2019), Article ID 3859230, 5 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/3859230

Clinical Study

A Retrospective Analysis of Three Antiviral Regimens of Peramivir in the Treatment of Severe Influenza A with Primary Viral Pneumonia

Jin-na Wang, Xu Wang, Shu-le Yu, Yue-hui Ding, Meng-lei Wang, and Hong-dou Chen

Department of Pharmacy, The Affiliated Suqian Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Suqian, Jiangsu 223800, China

Correspondence should be addressed to Hong-dou Chen; chenhongdou2000@aliyun.com

Received 29 October 2018; Revised 14 March 2019; Accepted 31 March 2019; Published 30 April 2019

Academic Editor: Theodoros I. Vassilakopoulos

Copyright © 2019 Jin-na Wang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

Objective. To evaluate the difference of clinical efficacy of peramivir alone and peramivir combined with immunomodulators (either ribonucleic acid or thymopetidum) in the treatment of severe influenza A with primary viral pneumonia. Methods. A retrospective analysis was applied to 45 patients who were diagnosed with severe influenza A with primary viral pneumonia in our hospital from December 2017 to March 2018. The cases were divided into three groups: the peramivir group, the peramivir combined with ribonucleic acid group, and the peramivir combined with thymopetidum group. Results. The duration of viral nucleic acid positivity in the peramivir group, the peramivir combined with ribonucleic acid group, and the peramivir combined with thymopetidum group was 6.13 ± 2.06, 6.53 ± 2.72, and 6.10 ± 1.37 days, respectively. The remission time of the clinical symptoms of the peramivir group, the peramivir combined with ribonucleic acid group, and the peramivir combined with thymopetidum group was 8.06 ± 2.73, 7.94 ± 2.89, and 7.67 ± 1.58 days, respectively. Comparisons between the peramivir group and the peramivir combined with ribonucleic acid group or the peramivir combined with thymopetidum group revealed no significant differences in the duration of virus nucleic acid positivity, remission time of clinical symptoms, time to fever alleviation, and time to cough alleviation. Conclusions. There is no observed benefit in the addition of ribonucleic acid or thymopetidum when peramivir sodium chloride injection is used in the treatment of severe influenza A with primary viral pneumonia. This trial is registered with ChiCTR1800019417.

1. Introduction

Influenza is an acute respiratory disease caused by the influenza virus. Due to its strong infectivity and rapid transmission, influenza has broken out in the world for many times which not only seriously affected the health of people in various countries but also caused immeasurable economic losses [1]. As we know, influenza is mostly self-limited and is usually accompanied by fever, shivering, headache, myalgia, and so on. However, some people such as the elderly, young children, and pregnant and lying-in women can easily develop into severe cases or even deaths because these populations are prone to complications including pneumonia, nervous system injury, and cardiac damage [2–4].

There are currently two categories of anti-influenza drugs. Category I are M2 ion channel blockers, and the main representative drugs are amantadine and rimantadine. These drugs are only effective against influenza A. In addition, because of the high variability of influenza viruses, the resistance to M2 ion channel blockers has been high. Therefore, this class of drugs is not recommended for treating influenza [5]. The second class of anti-influenza drugs is the neuraminidase (NA) inhibitors, such as oseltamivir, zanamivir, and peramivir, which are recommended as the main drugs. Oseltamivir is an oral preparation that cannot be used in critically ill patients and infants under the age of one. Zanamivir is an inhalant, and inhalants are not recommended for severe influenza patients and influenza patients with complications according to the Influenza Diagnosis and Treatment Program (2018 edition, China). The introduction of peramivir sodium chloride injection in China in 2013 has brought good news to patients with severe and critical influenza [6–8].

At present, the research on peramivir in the treatment of influenza is mainly concentrated in patients with simple infection [9, 10]. There are studies in special groups and patients with other diseases (e.g., in patients with diabetes or respiratory diseases or using immunosuppressive agents) [11–15], but few studies have reported the clinical efficacy of peramivir in severe cases [16]. The Influenza Diagnosis and Treatment Program (2018 edition, China) also noted that the current clinical data on peramivir for severe influenza cases were limited. In addition, the outbreak of influenza in northern and southern China since the autumn of 2017 has led to a large number of severe cases and even deaths. Most of these severe cases were complicated with primary viral pneumonia, and there was also a number of patients with a combination of secondary bacterial pneumonia or mixed pneumonia. Therefore, this study focuses on patients with severe influenza A complicated with primary viral pneumonia in our hospital.

In recent years, immunomodulators have been widely used in the treatment of many diseases. The most widely used immunomodulators include ribonucleic acid for injection II and thymopetidum for injection, both of which are used as adjuvant therapeutic drugs for tumors and diseases caused by immunodeficiency [17, 18]. When we study influenza cases in our hospital, we find that peramivir is usually combined with ribonucleic acid or thymopetidum in the treatment of influenza. It may be that clinicians believe immunomodulators can help alleviate influenza symptoms by improving immunity of patients. This finding has attracted our attention, so the purpose of this study is to determine whether it is meaningful in the addition of ribonucleic acid or thymopetidum when peramivir sodium chloride injection is used in the treatment of severe influenza A with primary viral pneumonia.

2. Patients and Methods

2.1. Diagnostic Criteria

The diagnostic criteria were based on the Influenza Diagnosis and Treatment Program (2018 edition, China). All enrolled patients were diagnosed as severe influenza A with primary viral pneumonia with the following three points. First, the pharyngeal swabs of the patients were tested with reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) influenza virus nucleic acid test kits, and the results showed that the patients were positive for influenza A. Second, the patients were diagnosed as primary viral pneumonia (excluding secondary bacterial pneumonia and mixed pneumonia) by clinicians through CRP values (CRP<20 mg/L), bacterial culture (negative results of bacterial culture), and clinical symptoms. Third, one of the following types of cases was considered a severe case: (1) persistent high fever for more than 3 days accompanied by severe cough, sputum, bloody sputum or chest pain; (2) rapid breathing, dyspnea, or cyanosis lips; (3) mental changes that could include slow reactions, sleepiness, restlessness, or convulsions; (4) severe vomiting, diarrhea, or dehydration; (5) combined with pneumonia; (6) significant aggravation of previous underlying diseases. All patients in our study were combined with pneumonia, so they were diagnosed as severe cases.

2.2. Patients and Groups

Forty-five hospitalized patients with severe influenza A complicated with primary viral pneumonia admitted to our hospital from December 2017 to March 2018 were selected according to “The Influenza Diagnosis and Treatment Plan” issued by China in 2018. The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) diagnosed as severe influenza A with primary viral pneumonia and (2) more than 18 years old, regardless of sex. The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) vaccinated for influenza within the past six months (2) taking M2 channel blockers (e.g., amantadine and rimantadine) and neuraminidase inhibitors (oseltamivir, zanamivir, etc.) within the past month. All patients were divided into three groups: group A (peramivir group), group B (peramivir combined with ribonucleic acid group), and group C (peramivir combined with thymopetidum group).

2.3. Therapeutic Method

According to treatment plan of clinicians, patients were divided into three groups. Group A patients were given peramivir sodium chloride injection (Ranbaxy, Guangzhou China). Group B patients received peramivir sodium chloride injection (the same dosage as group A) and ribonucleic acid for injection II (diluted with 5% glucose injection; Jilin Ao Dong Pharmaceutical Co.). Group C patients were treated with peramivir sodium chloride injection (the same dosage as group A) and thymopetidum for injection (diluted with 5% glucose injection; Xi’an Diesel Biological Pharmaceutical Co.).

Peramivir, 300 mg, was intravenously injected once a day. Ribonucleic acid, 100 mg, was intravenously injected once a day. Thymopetidum, 80 mg, was intravenously injected once a day.

2.4. Evaluation Indicator

To evaluate the efficacy of peramivir alone and peramivir combined with other drugs (either ribonucleic acid or thymopetidum) in the treatment of severe influenza A with primary viral pneumonia, the duration of virus nucleic acid positivity and remission time of clinical symptoms were selected as the main evaluation indicators. The patient’s temperature, respiratory symptoms (such as cough, sputum, sore throat, and nasal congestion), and systemic symptoms (such as muscle pain, chills, and fatigue) were recorded three times a day. The throat swab of patients was collected every two days, and test results were also recorded. The duration of virus nucleic acid positivity referred to the influenza virus nucleic acid going from positive to negative and being maintained for 24 hours or more. The remission time of the clinical symptoms was defined as the disappearance of all influenza symptoms or the presence of only mild influenza symptoms and maintenance of that condition for at least 24 hours. In addition, influenza can cause fever, cough, chills, fatigue, muscle soreness, and other clinical symptoms, so the remission time of these influenza symptoms also reflected the efficacy of these drugs. As shown in Table 1, most patients had influenza accompanied by the two symptoms of fever and cough. Therefore, the remission time of fever symptoms and the remission time of cough symptoms were selected as two secondary indexes to evaluate the efficacy of peramivir alone and peramivir combined with other drugs (either ribonucleic acid or thymopetidum) in the treatment of severe influenza A with primary viral pneumonia. Fever relief occurred when the body temperature dropped to 37.5 degrees and maintained for at least 24 hours. Cough relief referred to no cough or mild cough for at least 24 hours.

Table 1: Comparison of influenza symptoms in the three groups.

Symptom
Group A ()
Group B ()
Group C ()

Number
%
Number
%
Number
%

Fever
16
100
19
100
10
100

Cough
16
100
19
100
9
90

Expectoration
13
81.25
13
68.42
3
30

Chilly
3
18.75
10
52.63
7
70

Weak
5
31.25
5
26.32
1
10

Muscle soreness
1
6.25
8
42.11
1
10

Headache
4
25.00
1
5.26
4
40

Sore throat
2
12.50
6
31.58
1
10

Chest tightness
3
18.75
2
10.53
1
10

Nasal congestion
1
6.25
4
21.05
1
10

2.5. Statistical Analysis

Origin 8.0 software was used to process the data. The measurement data were expressed as the mean ± SD, and the numeration data were expressed as the number of cases and %. The χ² test was used for group comparisons, and the difference was considered statistically significant when .

3. Results

3.1. General Characteristics

Forty-five hospitalized patients with severe influenza A complicated with primary viral pneumonia admitted to our hospital from December 2017 to March 2018 were included in this study and divided into three groups (A, B, and C). Table 2 shows the general characteristics of the three groups of patients. The statistical analysis showed that there were no significant differences in these characteristics between the three groups.

Table 2: General characteristics of the study patients.

Item

Group A ()
Group B ()
Group C ()

Age, years
Mean ± SD
45.80 ± 15.71
44.38 ± 15.01
46.60 ± 15.72

Range
21–68
22–70
27–67

Sex
Male/female
8/8
8/11
4/6

%
50/50
42.11/57.89
40/60

Influenza A
Number
16
19
10

Primary pneumonia
Number
16
19
10

Body temperature at admission, °C
Mean ± SD
38.81 ± 0.50
38.49 ± 0.77
38.50 ± 0.91

Range
38.00–39.70
38.10–39.50
38.00–40.00

Time from onset to administration of drugs (>48 h)
Number
16
19
10

3.2. Clinical Efficacy

As shown in Table 3, the duration of viral nucleic acid positivity in the A, B, and C groups was 6.13 ± 2.06, 6.53 ± 2.72, and 6.10 ± 1.37 days, respectively. There were no significant differences between groups A and B or between groups A and C. In addition, the remission time of the clinical symptoms of the A, B, and C groups was 8.06 ± 2.73, 7.94 ± 2.89, and 7.67 ± 1.58 days, respectively. Compared with group A, the remission time of clinical symptoms in groups B and C was relatively shortened. However, little difference was observed between groups A and B or between groups A and C (Figure 1). The time to fever alleviation in the B and C groups was shorter than that in the A group, but no obvious differences were shown between group A and the other two groups. Lastly, when comparing the time to cough alleviation in group A with that of the other two groups, significant differences were also not detected.

Table 3: Clinical efficacy of three groups.

Item
Group A ()
Group B ()
value
Group A ()
Group C ()
value

Mean ± SD
Mean ± SD
Mean ± SD
Mean ± SD

Duration of virus nucleic acid positivity, days
6.13 ± 2.06
6.53 ± 2.72
0.19
6.13 ± 2.06
6.10 ± 1.37
0.65

Remission time of clinical symptoms, days
8.06 ± 2.73
7.94 ± 2.89
0.47
8.06 ± 2.73
7.67 ± 1.58
0.80

Time to fever alleviation, hours
28.89 ± 16.37
26.93 ± 12.04
0.74
28.89 ± 16.37
27.20 ± 8.87
0.96

Time to cough alleviation, hours
72.00 ± 31.45
69.43 ± 34.99
0.90
72.00 ± 31.45
70.00 ± 42.76
0.99

(a)

(b)

Figure 1: Duration of virus nucleic acid positivity (a) and remission time of clinical symptoms (b) in groups A, B, and C.

4. Discussion

4.1. Findings of the Study

In recent years, more and more scholars have paid attention to the topic of peramivir combining with other drugs (such as traditional Chinese medicine injections, Chinese medicine granules, and favipiravir [19]) in the treatment of influenza. Duan reported that peramivir combined with traditional Chinese medicine Qingre recipe has a definite effect on mild influenza and can shorten the remission time of influenza symptoms, which is worthy of promotion in clinic [20]. Li et al. reported that the combination of baicalin and peramivir exhibited a higher efficacy against influenza H1N1 virus infection than they were used alone. The combination of the two agents can not only reduce the dosage of peramivir but also reduce its side effects and drug resistance. The results suggested a potential clinical value of the combination of the two agents [21]. However, there is no report on peramivir combined with immunomodulator in the treatment of influenza at home and abroad. The aim of this study was to determine whether it is necessary to combine one immunomodulator (either ribonucleic acid or thymopetidum) with peramivir in the treatment of severe influenza A with primary viral pneumonia. From the results of the study, we can see that the three treatment regimens can alleviate the symptoms of influenza in all patients and turn the influenza virus negative. However, there was no significant difference in the four evaluation indicators (the duration of viral nucleic acid positivity, the remission time of the clinical symptoms, the time to fever alleviation, and the time to cough alleviation) between the peramivir group and the peramivir combined with ribonucleic acid group or the peramivir combined with thymopetidum group (). The results showed that no significant results were observed in the addition of ribonucleic acid or thymopetidum when peramivir sodium chloride injection is used in the treatment of severe influenza A with primary viral pneumonia, which suggests little potential clinical value of the combination of peramivir and one immunomodulator (either ribonucleic acid or thymopetidum). It may be that immunomodulators cannot relieve the symptoms of fever and cough caused by influenza like baicalin or traditional Chinese medicine Qingre recipe. In addition, another reason could be that the immunomodulators made in China cannot improve the immunity of patients in a short time, which cannot help alleviate influenza symptoms. This discovery of this study not only reduces medical expenses and improve medication compliance of patients but also improves the quality of medical services.

4.2. Limitations of the Study

The results (Table 3) showed that the average duration of viral nucleic acid positivity and the average remission time of clinical symptoms in the peramivir group were 6.13 and 8.06 days. These durations were significantly shorter than those reported by Chinese researchers Zhan et al. They reported the average duration of viral nucleic acid positivity and the average remission time of clinical symptoms for severe influenza A patients were 11.7 days and 13.21 days (all severe influenza A patients received oseltamivir phosphate capsules) [22]. Although the results show that peramivir can alleviate the clinical symptoms of patients and turn influenza virus negative. And, compared with the existing studies, peramivir has achieved better clinical results than oseltamivir for patients with severe influenza A. However, the absence of a control group (placebo or another neuraminidase inhibitor group) in our study does not confirm the efficacy of peramivir in the treatment of severe influenza A with primary viral pneumonia. Besides, another limitation of the study should also be pointed out. The throat swabs were taken every 2 days, so patients clearing the virus within 48 hours were all considered to have cleared the virus simultaneously. Thus, the estimation for the time to virus clearance lacks precision. In addition, there are some other shortcomings in this study, such as small sample size and lack of multicenter experiments. The reason is that our hospital is small, so we could not collect a large number of samples and we have no funds for multicenter experiments. In addition, the influenza subtype was not identified in this study because of limited experimental conditions. At present, our team is conducting a prospective randomized controlled study equipped with advanced medical equipment to identify influenza subtypes. In addition, due to cooperation with many medical institutions, this study can obtain a large number of samples. It is hoped that more meaningful data can be obtained so as to provide basis for clinical medication.

5. Conclusion

According to the results of this study, there is no observed benefit in the addition of ribonucleic acid or thymopetidum when peramivir sodium chloride injection is used in the treatment of severe influenza A with primary viral pneumonia. So, clinicians may consider not to use immunomodulators (either ribonucleic acid or thymopetidum) in combination with peramivir in the treatment of severe influenza A with primary viral pneumonia.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the Science and Technology Information Network in Suqian City (No. Z2018188).

References

Y. Liu, Y. H. Huang, B. L. Wei et al., “Efficacy and safety of clearing heat and detoxifying injection in the treatment of influenza: a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial,” Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 2014, Article ID 151235, 8 pages, 2014.

N. J. Cox and K. Subbarao, “Influenza,” The Lancet, vol. 354, no. 9186, pp. 1277–1282, 1999.

P. J. Gavin and R. B. Tomson Jr., “Review of rapid diagnostic tests for inﬂuenza,” Clinical and Applied Immunology Reviews, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 151–172, 2004.

D. Y. Oh and A. C. Hurt, “A review of the antiviral susceptibility of human and avian influenza viruses over the last decade,” Scientifica, vol. 2014, Article ID 430629, 10 pages, 2014.

W. S. Choi, S. Y. Ryu, J. Lee et al., “Safety and effectiveness of peramivir in Korean adult influenza patients: prospective observational study based on post-marketing surveillance data,” Journal of Korean Medical Science, vol. 33, no. 32, 2018.

B. Yu and X. Li, “Recent development for anti-influenza drugs,” Guangdong Chemical Industry, vol. 42, no. 01, pp. 65–67, 2015.

J. Lee, J.-H. Park, H. Jwa, and Y. H. Kim, “Comparison of efficacy of intravenous peramivir and oral oseltamivir for the treatment of influenza: systematic review and meta-analysis,” Yonsei Medical Journal, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 778–785, 2017.

T. Hikita, H. Hikita, F. Hikita, N. Hikita, and S. Hikita, “Clinical effectiveness of peramivir in comparison with other neuraminidase inhibitors in pediatric influenza patients,” International Journal of Pediatrics, vol. 2012, Article ID 834181, 4 pages, 2012.

T. Komeda, S. Ishii, Y. Itoh et al., “Post-marketing safety and effectiveness evaluation of the intravenous anti-influenza neuraminidase inhibitor peramivir (I): a drug use investigation,” Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy, vol. 20, no. 11, pp. 689–695, 2014.

M. M. Alame, E. Massaad, and H. Zaraket, “Peramivir: a novel intravenous neuraminidase inhibitor for treatment of acute influenza infections,” Frontiers in Microbiology, vol. 7, 2016.

T. Komeda, S. Ishii, Y. Itoh et al., “Post-marketing safety and effectiveness evaluation of the intravenous anti-influenza neuraminidase inhibitor peramivir (II): a pediatric drug use investigation,” Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 194–201, 2015.

S. Kohno, H. Kida, M. Mizuguchi et al., “Intravenous peramivir for treatment of influenza A and B virus infection in high-risk patients,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 55, no. 6, pp. 2803–2812, 2011.

N. Ishiguro, N. Koseki, M. Kaiho et al., “Clinical effectiveness of four neuraminidase inhibitors (oseltamivir, zanamivir, laninamivir, and peramivir) for children with influenza A and B in the 2014-2015 to 2016-2017 influenza seasons in Japan,” Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 449–457, 2018.

N. Hirotsu, Y. Saisho, T. Hasegawa, and T. Shishido, “Clinical and virologic effects of four neuraminidase inhibitors in influenza A virus-infected children (aged 4–12 years): an open-label, randomized study in Japan,” Expert Review of Anti-Infective Therapy, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 173–182, 2018.

S. Nakamura, T. Miyazaki, K. Izumikawa et al., “Efficacy and safety of intravenous peramivir compared with oseltamivir in high-risk patients infected with influenza A and B viruses: a multicenter randomized controlled study,” Open Forum Infectious Diseases, vol. 4, no. 3, Article ID ofx129, 2017.

C. Y. Yeh, F. D. Wang, Y.-C. Chuang et al., “Clinical outcomes and prognostic factors of patients with severe influenza receiving intravenous peramivir salvage therapy in intensive care units,” Journal of Microbiology, Immunology and Infection, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 697–704, 2018.

X. T. Lyu, P. Guo, S. Dan et al., “Effect of miR-320a up-regulation on apoptosis and migration of Bel-7402 cells induced by ribonucleic acid II,” Chinese Pharmacological Bulletin, vol. 33, no. 11, pp. 1510–1516, 2017.

L. Zhou, H. S. Xu, D. Zhao, Q. G. Wang, and Q. Xie, “Effects of immunotherapy on immune function and inflammatory factors in patients with severe pneumonia,” Laboratory Medicine and Clinic, vol. 14, no. 18, pp. 2658–2661, 2017.

S. Park, J. Kim, I. Lee et al., “Combination effects of peramivir and Favipiravir against oseltamivir-resistant 2009 pandemic influenza A(H1N1) infection in mice,” PLoS One, vol. 9, no. 7, Article ID e101325, 2014.

G. H. Duan, “Observation on the curative effect of the combination of Chinese and Western medicine in the treatment of influenza,” Journal of Modern Medicine & Health, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 282-283, 2019.

J. H. Li, F. F. Lin, J. Y. Du et al., “Antiviral effects of baicalin combined with peramivir against pandemic 2009 H1N1 virus in vitro and in vivo,” Chinese Pharmacological Bulletin, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 617–621, 2013.

H. Q. Zhan, L. J. Wang, N. Sun, H. Liu, X. Q. Li, and S. M. Bai, “Retrospective study of clinical efficacy and safety of oseltamivir in treatment of 527 cases of pandemic(H1N1),” Capital Medicine, vol. 12, pp. 52–54, 2014.