Cardiology Research and Practice

Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 986847, 7 pages

http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/986847

Clinical Study

Brachial-Ankle Pulse Wave Velocity Is the Only Index of Arterial Stiffness That Correlates with a Mitral Valve Indices of Diastolic Dysfunction, but No Index Correlates with Left Atrial Size

Bryan Chow and Simon W. Rabkin

Department of Medicine (Cardiology), University of British Columbia, Level 9, 2775 Laurel Street, Vancouver, BC, Canada, V5Z 1M9

Received 3 December 2012; Accepted 11 February 2013

Academic Editor: F. H. H. Leenen

Copyright © 2013 Bryan Chow and Simon W. Rabkin. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

The objective of this study was to determine the optimal assessment of arterial stiffness that relates to diastolic dysfunction. Forty-one patients had measurements of brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV), carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV), ankle brachial index (ABI), pulse pressure (PP), and augmentation index (AIx). Diastolic dysfunction was evaluated by echocardiographic indices of the ratio of the peak early diastolic mitral valve velocity and the peak late diastolic velocity (E/A ratio), left atrial diameter, and left atrial volume indexes. There was a significant () correlation between baPWV and E/A ratio with an inverse relationship indicating that higher arterial stiffness was associated with greater diastolic dysfunction. In contrast, there was no significant correlation between E/A ratio and cfPWV, PP, ABI, or AIx. After multivariate analysis, the relationship between baPWV and E/A ratio remained significant (), independent of age and systolic blood pressure (BP). There were no correlations between any index of vascular stiffness and left atrial dimension or volume. In summary, baPWV correlates with diastolic dysfunction, independent of a patient’s age and BP and is a better indicator of diastolic dysfunction than other indicators of arterial stiffness. baPWV has the utility of infering the presence of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction.

1. Introduction

Compromised left ventricular diastolic function represents an ongoing cardiovascular challenge from the perspective of its detection, assessment, and management [1, 2]. The early detection of diastolic dysfunction has garnered increasing attention because it predicts the development of heart failure [3, 4]. Currently, the primary imaging modality for assessing left ventricular diastolic function is Doppler echocardiography although there are controversies in the precision of its assessment [5–8]. It can require the integration of transmitral flow, pulmonary venous flow, mitral annular motion, myocardial deformation, and cardiac structure. This complex measurement of diastolic function can be reduced to several common elements—the assessment of transmitral flow velocity and evaluation of cardiac structure which includes left atrial size [1, 8]. The ratios of peak early diastolic mitral flow filling velocity (E) and of the peak late mitral diastolic filling velocity (A), E/A ratio, characterize the severity and stage of the diastolic dysfunction [9]. In diastolic dysfunction, the E/A ratio decreases as E velocity is reduced and A velocity is increased [9]. Because ageing alters the E/A ratio, age adjustment is necessary [6]. Another component of the assessment of diastolic dysfunction is left atrial (LA) dimension. LA size or volume has been proposed as a simple noninvasive assessment of the degree of LV diastolic dysfunction [10]. LA size is increased, and LA emptying is decreased in patients with diastolic heart failure [11].

While the role of arterial stiffness in prediction of cardiovascular events is well documented [12–15], the capacity of arterial stiffness to alter left ventricular diastolic function is less certain. Arterial stiffness is hypothesized to produce LV diastolic dysfunction through increased cardiac after load [16, 17] and reduced coronary perfusion; the latter is hypothesized to produce LV diastolic dysfunction through decreased diastolic blood pressure [18]. The concept that systolic arterial loading can impair subsequent diastolic function, however, was not substantiated by investigators using the more direct assessment of myocardial relaxation by examining LV pressure decay during early diastole or tau [19]. In addition, the proposition that arterial stiffness impairs left ventricular relaxation and subsequent diastolic dysfunction has had mixed clinical evidence, with some studies supporting the presence of an association [20], some are equivocal [21], while other studies found no relationship [22]. Some of the studies that reported a relationship between arterial stiffness and diastolic dysfunction did not adjust for factors such as age [20] that affect arterial stiffness and diastolic dysfunction independently.

Variations in reports may in part be due to differences in techniques for the measurement of arterial stiffness. Pulse wave velocity (PWV) is a validated method to quantify arterial stiffness [23] and can be measured in different arterial segments, with brachial-ankle PWV (baPWV) and carotid-femoral PWV (cfPWV) being the most common ones. Augmentation index (AIx), pulse pressure (PP), and increased ankle brachial index (ABI) are also indices of arterial stiffness. AIx has traditionally been considered to represent increased wave reflection [24], while more recently increased AIx has been attributed to a reduction in the reservoir function—compliance properties of the aorta and other elastic arteries [25]. Increased arterial stiffness produces an increase in systolic blood pressure and reduction in diastolic blood pressure which is easily recognized by an increase in pulse pressure [26]. Increased ABI, occurring in the absence of peripheral arterial disease, indicates a greater augmentation in systolic arterial pressure as the pulse wave moves the longer distance to the ankle arteries compared to the shorter distance to the brachial arteries, and it is due to an increase in arterial stiffness [27]. Which of these indices of arterial stiffness, if any, best identifies a relationship with diastolic dysfunction needs to be determined?

The objective of this study was to determine whether arterial stiffness is related to left ventricular diastolic dysfunction and to determine which of four indices of arterial stiffness—baPWV, cfPWV, ABI, or pulse pressure—correlated best with an echocardiographic assessment of diastolic dysfunction.

2. Methods

Patients from a cardiology clinic at a University teaching hospital who met the following criteria were studied. Men or women over the age of 45 years that agreed to participate in the study were included. Patients were only included if they had a satisfactory echocardiographic assessment without significant aortic or mitral valve diseases or impairment in left systolic ventricular function identified on echocardiographic assessment.

A noninvasive measure of vascular stiffness was performed as previously outlined [27, 28]. PWV and augmentation index were measured on an Omron Colin VP1000/2000 (Ill, USA). Briefly, the subject was examined while resting in the supine position, with electrocardiogram electrodes placed on both wrists and a microphone for detecting heart sounds placed on the left edge of the sternum. Blood pressure cuffs, which were connected to the device, were placed around both arms and ankles. After the participants rested in the supine position, the right carotid pulse wave and femoral artery contours were recorded simultaneously by placement of a transducer over these arteries. Using the carotid pressure waveform, the augmentation index (AIx) was calculated as the difference between the second and the first systolic shoulder and was expressed as a percentage of the carotid pulse contour. PWV was calculated as the ratio of the distance in meters from the brachial artery to ankle or carotid to femoral artery and the transit time in seconds, measured from the basal level of one pulse to the other either baPWV or cfPWV.

Cardiac structure and function were assessed according to a standardized protocol. Two-dimensional echocardiograms were performed. Parasternal long- and short-axes views were used to determine left ventricular end-diastolic and end-systolic measurements and wall thickness dimensions and left atrial diameter according to the recommendations of the American Society of Echocardiography [29]. Diastolic function was determined using Doppler assessment of mitral inflow velocity specifically peak early and late diastolic mitral flow velocities. Left atrial volume was measured using the biplane area-length method determined from the apical 4 chamber view. Left atrial volume was indexed by body surface area. All measurements were recorded by an ultrasonographer unaware of the clinical condition of the participants.

All numeric data are expressed as mean values (±SD), and categorical data are present at percentages. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were conducted using PASW Statistics 18. Statistical significance was set at .

3. Results

The study population consisted of 41 adult patients (mean age 68 ± 11 years, 66% male) of whom 73% had hypertension and 12% had diabetes mellitus (Table 1). The echocardiographic data indicate that the group had a normal systolic function with an ejection fraction of 63.3 ± 5%. There was a significant correlation between baPWV and E/A ratio (Figure 1). The relationship was negative, indicating a decreasing E/A ratio with increases in baPWV. None of the other indices of arterial stiffness, cfPWV, ABI, or Aix, correlated significantly with E/A ratio (Table 2). Measures of left atrial size, left atrial diameter (LAD) and left atrial volume index (LAVI), did not correlate significantly with any index of arterial stiffness. LAD correlated significantly with age. The number of subjects without hypertension is small and precluded meaningful separate analysis.

Table 1: Clinical characteristics of the study population.

Number of subjects
41

Age (years)
68 ± 11

Gender (% men)
66

BMI (kg/m²)
26.7 ± 3.6

BSA (m²)
1.84 ± 0.22

Hypertension (%)
73.2

Dyslipidemia (%)
48.8

Diabetes (%)
12.2

CAD (%)
22.0

Medications

    β-blockers (%)
34.1

    ACEIs (%)
36.6

    ARBs (%)
7.3

    CCBs (%)
24.4

    Statins (%)
43.9

    Aspirin (%)
53.7

    Antiplatelets (%)
14.6

    Diuretics (%)
19.5

Heart rate (bpm)
67.3 ± 12.8

SBP (mm Hg)
138.5 ± 18.1

DBP (mm Hg)
78.8 ± 8.4

PP (mm Hg)
59.7 ± 14.2

baPWV (cm/s)
1814 ± 415

cfPWV (cm/s)
1610 ± 500

AIx (%)
20.0 ± 18.3

ABI
1.14 ± 0.12

LAD (mm)
36.8 ± 6.5

LAVI (ml/m²)
33.5 ± 11.7

E (cm/s)
79.6 ± 26.0

A (cm/s)
76.0 ± 25.5

E/A
1.15 ± 0.54

Age < 60: 1.3 ± 0.4

Age ≥ 60: 1.1 ± 0.6

LVEF (%)
63.3 ± 5.0

LVM (g)
151.2 ± 36.6

LVMI (g/m²)
80.3 ± 21.0

LVDD (mm)
45.0 ± 5.1

LVSD (mm)
28.4 ± 5.5

IVST (mm)
10.0 ± 1.4

PWT (mm)
9.7 ± 1.2

BMI: body mass index, BSA: body surface index, CAD: coronary artery disease, ACEIs: angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, ARBs: angiotensin II receptor antagonists, CCBs: calcium channel blockers, SBP: systolic blood pressure, DBP: diastolic blood pressure, PP: pulse pressure, ABI: ankle-brachial index, Aix: augmentation index, cfPWV: carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity, baPWV: brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity, LAD: left atrial diameter, LAVI: left atrial volume index, E: peak early diastolic filling velocity, A: peak late diastolic filling velocity, E/A: E/A ratio; LVEF: left ventricular ejection fraction, LVM: left ventricular mass, LVMI: left ventricular mass index, LVDD: left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, LVSD: left ventricular end-systolic diameter, IVS: interventricular septal end-diastolic thickness, and PWT: posterior wall end-diastolic thickness.

Table 2: Univariate correlates between echocardiographic variables and indices of arterial stiffness.

E/A
LAd
LAVI

baPWV
−0.311*
0.04
0101
0.52
0.008
0.96

cfPWV
−0.040
0.11
0.119
0.45
0.213
0.18

PP
−0.152
0.34
0.260
0.10
0.238
0.13

ABI
0.156
0.32
−0.096
0.55
0.135
0.40

AIx
−0.044
0.78
0.048
0.76
−0.098
0.54

Age
−0.180
0.26
0.313*
0.04
0.210
0.18

SBP
−0.170
0.28
0.144
0.36
0.108
0.50

: pearson correlation coefficient; other abbreviations as in Table 1. *Indicates .

Figure 1: The relationship between baPWV and E/A ratio.

Because baPWV and cfPWV comprise some of the same elements of arterial stiffness, the relationship between baPWV and cfPWV was explored by a linear correlation analysis. There was a significant relationship between the two factors with an value of 0.717 or value of 0.514 (Figure 2). The line of identity demonstrates that baPWV exceeds cfPWV on a consistent basis. baPWV was 17% greater than cfPWV.

Figure 2: The relationship between baPWV and cfPWV.

Age was positively correlated with baPWV () and cfPWV (). There were also significant positive correlations between systolic blood pressure (SBP) and both baPWV () and cfPWV (). Pulse pressure was significantly correlated with cfPWV (), but IT did not correlate significantly with baPWV or AIx. There was a significant positive correlation between age and pulse pressure ().

The relationship between age and indices of aortic stiffness necessitates the use of multivariate analysis in order to consider the potential effect of age on the relationship between aortic stiffness and E/A ratio. A significant association between baPWV and E/A ratio persisted after adjusting for age, SBP, and PP in a multiple regression analysis (Table 3). Multivariate analysis was utilized, in case one of the variables was obscuring a relationship between cfPWV and E/A ratio. Age and SBP were significantly correlated with cfPWV in multivariate analysis. There was no significant relationship between cfPWV and E/A ratio after multiple regression analysis (Table 4).

Table 3: Multivariate analysis for baPWV.

Model
Unstandardized
Standardized
Sig
95% Confidence

beta
S.E.
Beta

for beta

E/A
−455.5
215.065
−.588
−2.118
.042
−892.604
−18.473

Age
26.9
4.959
.751
5.418
.000
16.791
36.947

SBP
21.5
6.315
.937
3.401
.002
8.644
34.310

PP
−23.7
8.286
−.811
−2.854
.007
−40.489
−6.810

Table 4: Multivariate analysis for cfPWV.

Model
Unstandardized
Standardized
Sig
95% Confidence

Beta
S.E.
Beta

for beta

E/A
−21.990
278.229
−.024
−.079
.937
−587.418
543.438

Age
26.356
6.415
.611
4.108
.000
13.319
39.393

SBP
22.997
8.170
.833
2.815
.008
6.395
39.600

PP
−18.876
10.720
−.537
−1.761
.087
−40.661
2.909

SBP is systolic blood pressure.PP is pulse pressure.

4. Discussion

The major contribution of this study is the comparative analysis of different indices of arterial stiffness and their association with left ventricular diastolic dysfunction. We found that baPWV was significantly correlated with an indicator of diastolic dysfunction, and the association was independent of age and blood pressure. Importantly, baPWV was a better predictor of diastolic dysfunction than several other indices of arterial stiffness, namely, cfPWV, AIx, PP, or ABI.

Both baPWV and cfPWV are indicators of arterial stiffness, and each of them is related to cardiovascular morbidity and mortality [14, 15, 30–32]. With regards to diastolic dysfunction, recent investigations have mainly examined either baPWV [22, 33–37] or cfPWV [20, 38–41] in relation to E/A ratio. We compared baPWV and cfPWV and found a significant relationship between diastolic dysfunction and baPWV but not with cfPWV. It was not our purpose to compare baPWV versus cfPWV over the spectrum of cardiovascular diseases; we rather focused solely on the association with an index of left ventricular diastolic function and found a greater utility for baPWV. While both baPWV and cfPWV are indicators of arterial stiffness, baPWV is an indicator of the combination of central and peripheral arterial stiffness [31, 42–44]. Our study suggests that the effects of peripheral arterial stiffness on ventricular diastolic function are better represented by the greater arterial path measured by baPWV as compared to the centrally confined path of cfPWV. While baPWV and cfPWV are highly and significantly correlated with each other, the correlation is far from being identical. We found a of 0.513, indicating that only about 50% of the variance of one is accounted for by the other. This value is similar to the one reported by others () [42]. We found that baPWV was predominantly greater than cfPWV by 17%. This is consistent with another report that shows that, on average, baPWV was approximately 20% higher than cfPWV [42]. The higher value presumably reflects the additional contribution of “peripheral” (or muscular) arterial stiffness to central arterial stiffness [43]. baPWV recognizes a different vascular stiffness pathway, and, is one differently affected by interventions such as weight loss [45]. The association of baPWV with an increased risk of total cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality [15] may reflect the effect of baPWV on the heart.

Our finding that baPWV correlates with LV diastolic function is consistent with several studies [34, 35, 37] but they did not compare baPWV with a wide range of other measurements of arterial stiffness. Wang et al. compared PWV measurements in the brachial-ankle, carotid-femoral, heart-femoral, and heart-carotid segments among hypertensive patients and also found baPWV to be the best predictor of diastolic dysfunction amongst measurements of PWV [46]. However, they did not conduct a multivariate analysis adjusting for age and blood pressure [46]—two factors that influence diastolic cardiac function.

Age and systolic blood pressure are the two primary determinants of baPWV and cfPWV as we found and as has been reported previously [42]. Therefore, our measurements of PWV were adjusted for these two parameters. With advancing age, arterial stiffness increases due to changes in arterial elasticity and compliance, leading to elevations in systolic pressures and pulse pressure [47–49]. Prolonged elevations in blood pressure can also independently lead to similar changes in the vasculature that increases arterial stiffness [50, 51]. The associations of age, SBP, and PP with baPWV and cfPWV are confirmed in the present study. After including these factors in multivariate analysis, the negative relationship between baPWV and E/A ratio remained significant, and the baPWV relationship with mitral valve velocity measurements was independent of age, SBP, and PP.

We did not find any associations between indices of arterial stiffness and left atrial size assessment either by left atrial diameter or left atrial volume. While left atrial size has been purported to be a marker of chronic diastolic dysfunction and cardiovascular disease risk [52], previous data on the relationship of left atrial size and arterial stiffness have been limited and somewhat conflicting. One study reported no significant association between PWV or pulse pressure and left atrial size but an association between AIx and left atrial size [21]. Another study reported a significant correlation between cfPWV and left atrial diameter [39]. Brachial-ankle PWV and cfPWV correlated with left atrial diameter in patients with hypertension, end-stage renal disease, and heart failure [53]. One potential explanation for the differences between studies is the differences in the proportion of other factors that influence left atrial size in each of the study population. Left atrial size is larger in patients with hypertension and in the elderly as well as patients with reduced left ventricular systolic function [11, 22]. The proportion of individuals with each of these characteristics likely influenced the relationship between left atrial size and arterial stiffness. Our study consisted of individuals with normal LV systolic function.

Augmentation index was not associated with diastolic dysfunction in our study. This finding is consistent with two studies [21, 54] but contrasts with the findings of two another studies [55, 56]. While AIx is an indicator of arterial stiffness, pulse wave velocity more closely correlates with adverse cardiovascular outcomes [57]. We did not find any relationship between pulse pressure and diastolic function. Our findings are consistent with some previous data that say that PWV is superior to central and brachial pulse pressures for the detection of diastolic dysfunction in older adults with “preserved” LV ejection fraction [58].

Several possible limitations of this study should be considered. The patient population is relatively small. However, significant correlations were still found. Secondly, the changes in E/A ratio with the progression of diastolic dysfunction are such that the initial impairment of diastolic function is manifested as a decreased E/A ratio. In long standing disease, changes in ventricular and atrial structure occur, and the diastolic dysfunction may predominantly have a restrictive pattern, which is manifested as an increased E/A ratio [6]. Others however disagree with this postulated pattern of progression [8]. The use of decreasing E/A ratio as an indicator of diastolic dysfunction is appropriate in this study that consists of a study population without severe cardiac disease. Third, we focused mainly on E/A ratio as an indicator of diastolic dysfunction. Mitral valve velocities and myocardial tissue Doppler measurements can provide additional important data on the state of diastolic function. However, each of these measurements has unique limitations in their correlation with more precise measurements of diastolic function [8]. Importantly, E/A ratio remains a standard among the field of the detection of diastolic dysfunction. Fourth, subjects were on antihypertensive drugs that can impact on arterial stiffness and minimize the wave reflection thereby altering the relative strength of the relationship between different indices of arterial stiffness and diastolic function [59]. Fifth, we use the term arterial stiffness recognizing that this term may encompass abnormalities in separate measures of arterial compliance, distensibility, pressure augmentation, or wave reflection in different segments of the vasculature.

In summary, the present study shows that increased baPWV is associated with diastolic dysfunction, measured by E/A ratio. Age, SBP, and PP were major determinants of increased baPWV, but the relationship between baPWV and E/A ratio was independent of these clinical variables. Our findings show that baPWV is more closely correlated with E/A ratio than with other indices of arterial stiffness, namely cfPWV, AIx, ABI, or pulse pressure. The more extensive arterial pathway measured by baPWV in comparison to cfPWV may explain this relationship. These data suggest that measuring baPWV has the utility of infering or suspecting the presence of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

References

B. A. Borlaug and W. J. Paulus, “Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment,” European Heart Journal, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 670–679, 2011.

J. J. McMurray, S. Adamopoulos, S. D. Anker et al., “ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2008. The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure 2008 of the European Society of Cardiology. Developed in collaboration with the Heart Failure Association of the ESC (HFA) and endorsed by the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM),” European Journal of Heart Failure, vol. 10, no. 10, pp. 933–989, 2008.

G. C. Kane, B. L. Karon, D. W. Mahoney et al., “Progression of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction and risk of heart failure,” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 306, no. 6, pp. 856–863, 2011.

C. S. P. Lam, A. Lyass, E. Kraigher-Krainer et al., “Cardiac dysfunction and noncardiac dysfunction as precursors of heart failure with reduced and preserved ejection fraction in the community,” Circulation, vol. 124, no. 1, pp. 24–30, 2011.

C. Tschöpe and W. J. Paulus, “Is echocardiographic evaluation of diastolic function useful in determining clinical care? Doppler echocardiography yields dubious estimates of left ventricular diastolic pressures,” Circulation, vol. 120, no. 9, pp. 810–819, 2009.

S. F. Nagueh, C. P. Appleton, T. C. Gillebert et al., “Recommendations for the evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function by echocardiography,” Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 107–133, 2009.

W. C. Little and J. K. Oh, “Echocardiographic evaluation of diastolic function can be used to guide clinical care,” Circulation, vol. 120, no. 9, pp. 802–809, 2009.

K. O. Ogunyankin, “Assessment of left ventricular diastolic function: the power, possibilities, and pitfalls of echocardiographic imaging techniques,” Canadian Journal of Cardiology, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 311–318, 2011.

R. A. Nishimura and A. J. Tajik, “Evaluation of diastolic filling of left ventricle in health and disease: doppler echocardiography is the clinician's Rosetta Stone,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 8–18, 1997.

C. L. Simek, M. D. Feldman, H. L. Haber, C. C. Wu, A. R. Jayaweera, and S. Kaul, “Relationship between left ventricular wall thickness and left atrial size: comparison with other measures of diastolic function,” Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 37–47, 1995.

J. S. Gottdiener, D. W. Kitzman, G. P. Aurigemma, A. M. Arnold, and T. A. Manolio, “Left atrial volume, geometry, and function in systolic and diastolic heart failure of persons ≥65 years of age (The Cardiovascular Health Study),” The American Journal of Cardiology, vol. 97, no. 1, pp. 83–89, 2006.

C. Vlachopoulos, K. Aznaouridis, M. F. O'Rourke, M. E. Safar, K. Baou, and C. Stefanadis, “Prediction of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality with central haemodynamics: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” European Heart Journal, vol. 31, no. 15, pp. 1865–1871, 2010.

F. U. S. Mattace-Raso, T. J. M. Van Der Cammen, A. Hofman et al., “Arterial stiffness and risk of coronary heart disease and stroke: the Rotterdam Study,” Circulation, vol. 113, no. 5, pp. 657–663, 2006.

S. Laurent, P. Boutouyrie, R. Asmar et al., “Aortic stiffness is an independent predictor of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in hypertensive patients,” Hypertension, vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 1236–1241, 2001.

C. Vlachopoulos, K. Aznaouridis, D. Terentes-Printzios, N. Ioakeimidis, and C. Stefanadis, “Prediction of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality with brachial-ankle elasticity index: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” Hypertension, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 556–562, 2012.

T. Weber, M. F. O'Rourke, M. Ammer, E. Kvas, C. Punzengruber, and B. Eber, “Arterial stiffness and arterial wave reflections are associated with systolic and diastolic function in patients with normal ejection fraction,” American Journal of Hypertension, vol. 21, no. 11, pp. 1194–1202, 2008.

B. A. Borlaug, V. Melenovsky, M. M. Redfield et al., “Impact of arterial load and loading sequence on left ventricular tissue velocities in humans,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 50, no. 16, pp. 1570–1577, 2007.

I. Guelen, F. U. S. Mattace-Raso, N. M. Van Popele et al., “Aortic stiffness and the balance between cardiac oxygen supply and demand: the Rotterdam Study,” Journal of Hypertension, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 1237–1243, 2008.

M. R. Starling, D. G. Montgomery, G. B. J. Mancini, and R. A. Walsh, “Load independence of the rate of isovolumic relaxation in man,” Circulation, vol. 76, no. 6, pp. 1274–1281, 1987.

G. Soldatos, K. Jandeleit-Dahm, H. Thomson et al., “Large artery biomechanics and diastolic dysfunctionin patients with Type 2 diabetes,” Diabetic Medicine, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 54–60, 2011.

W. P. Abhayaratna, M. E. Barnes, M. F. O'Rourke et al., “Relation of arterial stiffness to left ventricular diastolic function and cardiovascular risk prediction in patients ≥65 years of age,” The American Journal of Cardiology, vol. 98, no. 10, pp. 1387–1392, 2006.

P. C. Hsu, T. H. Lin, C. S. Lee et al., “Mismatch between arterial stiffness increase and left ventricular diastolic dysfunction,” Heart and Vessels, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 485–492, 2010.

R. Asmar, A. Benetos, J. Topouchian et al., “Assessment of arterial distensibility by automatic pulse wave velocity measurement: validation and clinical application studies,” Hypertension, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 485–490, 1995.

M. F. O'Rourke and W. W. Nichols, “Aortic diameter, aortic stiffness, and wave reflection increase with age and isolated systolic hypertension,” Hypertension, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 652–658, 2005.

J. E. Davies, J. Baksi, D. P. Francis et al., “The arterial reservoir pressure increases with aging and is the major determinant of the aortic augmentation index,” American Journal of Physiology, vol. 298, no. 2, pp. H580–H586, 2010.

W. W. Nichols, M. F. O'Rouke, and C. Vlackopoulos, McDonald's Blood Flow in Arteries: Theoretical, Experimental and Clinical Principles, Hodder Arnold, London, UK, 2011.

S. W. Rabkin, S. H. Chan, and C. Sweeney, “Ankle-brachial index as an indicator of arterial stiffness in patients without peripheral artery disease,” Angiology, vol. 63, pp. 150–154, 2012.

S. W. Rabkin and S. H. Chan, “Correlation of pulse wave velocity with left ventricular mass in patients with hypertension once blood pressure has been normalized,” Heart International, vol. 7, p. e5, 2012.

R. M. Lang, M. Bierig, R. B. Devereux et al., “Recommendations for chamber quantification: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography's guidelines and standards committee and the Chamber Quantification Writing Group, developed in conjunction with the European Association of Echocardiography, a branch of the European Society of Cardiology,” Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography, vol. 18, no. 12, pp. 1440–1463, 2005.

T. C. Turin, Y. Kita, N. Rumana et al., “Brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity predicts all-cause mortality in the general population: findings from the Takashima study, Japan,” Hypertension Research, vol. 33, no. 9, pp. 922–925, 2010.

A. Yamashina, H. Tomiyama, K. Takeda et al., “Validity, reproducibility, and clinical significance of noninvasive brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity measurement,” Hypertension Research, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 359–364, 2002.

M. Nakamura, T. Yamashita, J. Yajima et al., “Brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity as a risk stratification index for the short-term prognosis of type 2 diabetic patients with coronary artery disease,” Hypertension Research, vol. 33, no. 10, pp. 1018–1024, 2010.

Y. Usui, Y. Takata, Y. Inoue et al., “Severe obstructive sleep apnea impairs left ventricular diastolic function in non-obese men,” Sleep Medicine, vol. 4, p. 4, 2011.

L. Xu, C. Q. Jiang, T. H. Lam et al., “Arterial stiffness and left-ventricular diastolic dysfunction: Guangzhou Biobank Cohort Study-CVD,” Journal of Human Hypertension, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 152–158, 2011.

C. M. Chung, C. M. Chu, S. T. Chang et al., “Quantification of aortic stiffness to predict the degree of left ventricular diastolic function,” American Journal of the Medical Sciences, vol. 340, no. 6, pp. 468–473, 2010.

M. Yambe, H. Tomiyama, Y. Hirayama et al., “Arterial stiffening as a possible risk factor for both atherosclerosis and diastolic heart failure,” Hypertension Research, vol. 27, no. 9, pp. 625–631, 2004.

H. Masugata, S. Senda, K. Yoshikawa et al., “Relationships between echocardiographic findings, pulse wave velocity, and carotid atherosclerosis in type 2 diabetic patients,” Hypertension Research, vol. 28, no. 12, pp. 965–971, 2005.

G. Soldatos, K. Jandeleit-Dahm, H. Thomson et al., “Large artery biomechanics and diastolic dysfunctionin patients with type 2 diabetes,” Diabetic Medicine, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 54–60, 2011.

H. Triantafyllidi, S. Tzortzis, J. Lekakis et al., “Association of target organ damage with three arterial stiffness indexes according to blood pressure dipping status in untreated hypertensive patients,” American Journal of Hypertension, vol. 23, no. 12, pp. 1265–1272, 2010.

C. Tsioufis, D. Chatzis, K. Dimitriadis et al., “Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction is accompanied by increased aortic stiffness in the early stages of essential hypertension: a TDI approach,” Journal of Hypertension, vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 1745–1750, 2005.

C. D. Libhaber, G. R. Norton, O. H. I. Majane et al., “Contribution of central and general adiposity to abnormal left ventricular diastolic function in a community sample with a high prevalence of obesity,” The American Journal of Cardiology, vol. 104, no. 11, pp. 1527–1533, 2009.

H. Tanaka, M. Munakata, Y. Kawano et al., “Comparison between carotid-femoral and brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity as measures of arterial stiffness,” Journal of Hypertension, vol. 27, no. 10, pp. 2022–2027, 2009.

J. Sugawara, K. Hayashi, T. Yokoi et al., “Brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity: an index of central arterial stiffness?” Journal of Human Hypertension, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 401–406, 2005.

M. Munakata, N. Ito, T. Nunokawa, and K. Yoshinaga, “Utility of automated brachial ankle pulse wave velocity measurements in hypertensive patients,” American Journal of Hypertension, vol. 16, no. 8, pp. 653–657, 2003.

J. N. Cooper, J. M. Buchanich, A. Youk et al., “Reductions in arterial stiffness with weight loss in overweight and obese young adults: potential mechanisms,” Atherosclerosis, vol. 223, no. 2, pp. 485–490, 2012.

C. P. Wang, W. C. Hung, T. H. Yu et al., “Brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity as an early indicator of left ventricular diastolic function among hypertensive subjects,” Clinical and Experimental Hypertension, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 31–43, 2009.

G. F. Mitchell, H. Parise, E. J. Benjamin et al., “Changes in arterial stiffness and wave reflection with advancing age in healthy men and women: the Framingham Heart Study,” Hypertension, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 1239–1245, 2004.

A. Benetos, B. Waeber, J. Izzo et al., “Influence of age, risk factors, and cardiovascular and renal disease on arterial stiffness: clinical applications,” American Journal of Hypertension, vol. 15, no. 12, pp. 1101–1108, 2002.

P. V. Vaitkevicius, J. L. Fleg, J. H. Engel et al., “Effects of age and aerobic capacity on arterial stiffness in healthy adults,” Circulation, vol. 88, no. 4, pp. 1456–1462, 1993.

S. S. Franklin, “Arterial stiffness and hypertension: a two-way street?” Hypertension, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 349–351, 2005.

M. O'Rourke, “Arterial stiffness, systolic blood pressure, and logical treatment of arterial hypertension,” Hypertension, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 339–347, 1990.

P. S. Douglas, “The left atrium: a biomarker of chronic diastolic dysfunction and cardiovascular disease risk,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 42, no. 7, pp. 1206–1207, 2003.

W. C. Yu, S. Y. Chuang, Y. P. Lin, and C. H. Chen, “Brachial-ankle vs carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity as a determinant of cardiovascular structure and function,” Journal of Human Hypertension, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 24–31, 2008.

I. Nakae, S. Matsuo, T. Matsumoto, K. Mitsunami, and M. Horie, “Augmentation index and pulse wave velocity as indicators of cardiovascular stiffness,” Angiology, vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 421–426, 2008.

I. Ikonomidis, J. Lekakis, C. Papadopoulos et al., “Incremental value of pulse wave velocity in the determination of coronary microcirculatory dysfunction in never-treated patients with essential hypertension,” American Journal of Hypertension, vol. 21, no. 7, pp. 806–813, 2008.

T. Weber, J. Auer, M. F. O'Rourke, C. Punzengruber, E. Kvas, and B. Eber, “Prolonged mechanical systole and increased arterial wave reflections in diastolic dysfunction,” Heart, vol. 92, no. 11, pp. 1616–1622, 2006.

S. Laurent and P. Boutouyrie, “Recent advances in arterial stiffness and wave reflection in human hypertension,” Hypertension, vol. 49, no. 6, pp. 1202–1206, 2007.

W. P. Abhayaratna, W. Srikusalanukul, and M. M. Budge, “Aortic stiffness for the detection of preclinical left ventricular diastolic dysfunction: pulse wave velocity versus pulse pressure,” Journal of Hypertension, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 758–764, 2008.

Y. Matsui, K. Eguchi, M. F. O'Rourke et al., “Differential effects between a calcium channel blocker and a diuretic when used in combination with angiotensin II receptor blocker on central aortic pressure in hypertensive patients,” Hypertension, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 716–723, 2009.