Disease Markers
Volume 2017 (2017), Article ID 3104180, 5 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/3104180

Research Article

A Case-Control Study of the Association between Polymorphisms in the Fibrinogen Alpha Chain Gene and Schizophrenia

Wenwang Rao,¹ Na Zhou,1,2 Huiping Zhang,3,4 Rui Liu,¹ Shangchao Zhang,¹ Yingying Su,¹ Guang Yang,¹ Yue Ma,¹ Jieping Shi,¹ Yaqin Yu,¹ and Qiong Yu¹

¹Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Jilin University, Changchun, China
²Department of Pharmacy, Stomatology Hospital, Jilin University, Changchun 130041, China
³Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
⁴VA Medical Center, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT, USA

Correspondence should be addressed to Qiong Yu; yuqiong@jlu.edu.cn

Received 15 October 2016; Accepted 27 December 2016; Published 19 January 2017

Academic Editor: Hubertus Himmerich

Copyright © 2017 Wenwang Rao et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

Our previous studies using the mass spectrum analysis provided evidence that fibrinopeptide A (FPA) could be a potential biomarker for schizophrenia diagnosis. We sought further to demonstrate that variants in the fibrinogen alpha chain gene (FGA) coded FPA might confer vulnerability to schizophrenia. 1,145 patients with schizophrenia and 1,016 healthy volunteers from the Han population in Northeast China were recruited. The association of three tag single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) (rs2070011 in the UTR, rs2070016 in intron 4, and rs2070022 in the UTR) in FGA and schizophrenia was examined using a case-control study design. Genotypic distributions of these three SNPs were not found to be significantly different between cases and controls (rs2070011: , ; rs2070016: , ; rs2070022: , ). There were also no significant differences in SNP allelic frequencies between cases and controls (all ). Additionally, the frequency of haplotypes consisting of alleles of these three SNPs was not significantly different between cases and healthy control subjects (global , ). Our study did not show a significant association of FGA SNPs with schizophrenia. Future studies may need to test more FGA SNPs in a larger sample to identify those SNPs with a minor or moderate effect on schizophrenia.

1. Introduction

Schizophrenia (SZ, OMIM181500), which is characterized by delusions, hallucinations, altered cognition, emotional reactivity, and disorganized behavior [1], remains one of the most severe and heterogeneous neuropsychiatric disorders. It affects approximately 1% of the population worldwide. Owing to the pervasiveness of associated deficits and frequently life-long course, the burden of schizophrenia is ranked among the top ten diseases in the world [2]. Despite vigorous studies on schizophrenia over the past century, the etiology of schizophrenia remains obscure and available treatments for schizophrenia are only modestly effective [3].

Our recent study demonstrated that fibrinopeptide A (FPA) was a potential biomarker for diagnosis of schizophrenia using the mass spectrum analysis [4]. First, our study built the diagnosis model by analyzing serum protein expression differences between 166 schizophrenic patients and 201 healthy controls. Second, we validated this model in newly recruited 76 schizophrenic patients and 103 healthy volunteers. Third, we assessed the ability of the pattern in differentiating schizophrenia from other chronic diseases by testing the model in another set of a sample consisting of 44 cases and 41 hypertensive or diabetic patients. Fourth, our study observed a number of peaks that were different between patients with first-episode schizophrenia and healthy volunteers via the diagnosis model. When m/z 1206.58 of the peptide was served as an independent biomarker to differentiate patients with schizophrenia from healthy volunteers, the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.981 in receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. While m/z 1206.58 of the peptide was utilized to differentiate schizophrenic patients from patients with other chronic diseases, the AUC reached 0.999 in ROC curve analysis. Finally, through the MALDI-TOF/TOF-MS analysis [5], the peptide with m/z 1206.58 was characterized as FPA.

Given that the level of FPA was significantly different between schizophrenic patients and healthy individuals [4], we speculated whether some polymorphisms located in the FGA gene may have regulated the expression of FGA gene. Hence, our research group selected three FGA tagSNPs and analyzed their association with schizophrenia in the Chinese Han population.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Population

A total of 1,145 schizophrenia patients (mean age = years; 49.2% males) were recruited from the Changchun Mental Hospital of Jilin University in Northeast of China. Two independent experienced psychiatrists interviewed each patient and made the diagnosis based on the International Statistical Classification of Disease and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision. The concordant diagnosis was obtained between two raters, with an interrater reliability for diagnostic consensus . Healthy control subjects (mean age = years; 53.4% males), consisting of 1,016 healthy volunteers without a past and present history of psychiatric disorders, were recruited from the Health Medical Center, located at the First Hospital Affiliated to Jilin University in Northeast China.

All subjects gave written informed consent, which was approved by the ethics committee of the School of Public Health, Jilin University. Each participant was Han Chinese living in Jilin Province of China. They attended this study on a voluntary basis and voluntarily offered blood samples for the genotyping analysis.

2.2. DNA Extraction and SNP Genotyping

Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood lymphocytes using the ClotBlood DNA Kit (Cwbio, Beijing) and detected using an ultraviolet spectrophotometer (Beckman, USA), OD260/OD280: 1.6–1.9.

We selected three tagSNPs located in the fibrinogen alpha chain gene (FGA) by Haploview 4.2 using genotype data from Genome Browser release #27 in the HapMap Project (http://www.hapmap.org). FGA is mapped to Chromosome 4q28 and contains six exons. These three tagSNPs included rs2070011 (in the 5′UTR of FGA), rs2070016 (in intron 4 of FGA), and rs2070022 (in the 3′UTR of FGA). The primers for genotyping these three tagSNPs were designed using the AssayDesigner3.1 and are listed in Table 1.

Table 1: Primers for polymerase chain reaction.

SNPs
Primer sequence (5′-3′)

rs2070011
F: 5′-ACGTTGGATGGATTAACCAAACCTCTTGCAG-3′,

R: 5′-ACGTTGGATGGCACTCCAGCTGAAAGAAAG-3′

rs2070016
F: 5′-ACGTTGGATGGAGAAACTCTGGAATGAGGG-3′,

R: 5′-ACGTTGGATGAACCAGGCTCCTGAGTATTG-3′

rs2070022
F: 5′-ACGTTGGATGCTCTCTGCAACCTTGAAGAC-3′,

R: 5′-ACGTTGGATGTGCTTTCCAATGGCATTATG-3′

SNP genotyping was determined by the allele-specific matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF-MS) using the Sequenom MassARRAY platform in Bio-X Institutes, Beijing [6]. Using a MassARRAY Nanodispenser (Sequenom, San Diego, CA, USA), standardized genotyping reactions were dispensed onto a 384-well spectroCHIP [7]. The repeated control samples were set in every genotyping plate and the concordance was more than 99%.

2.3. Statistical Analysis

Sex differences were compared between cases and controls by Pearson’s tests. The Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) was examined by the Chi-square () goodness-of-fit test. The FGA SNP allele frequencies and genotype distributions were analyzed using the Chi-square () test. Pairwise linkage disequilibrium (LD) between FGA SNPs was operated using Haploview 4.2 [8]. The haplotype analysis was executed using UNPHASED 2.404 [9], and 10,000 permutations were performed to adjust for multiple testing. The power defined that the probability that the test correctly rejects the null hypothesis (H0) when the alternative hypothesis (H1) is true of the sample was calculated using Quanto 1.2.4 Software [10]. We hypothesized the known risk allele frequencies and a schizophrenia population prevalence of 0.01 as well as analyzing log-additive, recessive, and dominant models, respectively.

All statistical analysis was carried out using SPSS version 21.0 (IBM SPSS, IBM Corp, Armonk, NY, USA).   values were two-tailed, and was considered to be the suggestive association level.

3. Results

3.1. Demographic Characteristics and HWE Test Results

No significant sex differences were found between cases with schizophrenia and healthy controls , ). No deviation from HWE was detected in both cases and control groups for the three tagSNPs (all ) except for rs2070011 and rs2070016 in the control group (, ; , ). We randomly chose 10% of the samples from the control group to replicate the genotyping results. The genotyping accuracy rate was more than 99%.

3.2. The Allele and Genotype Analysis

Table 2 shows genotype distributions and allele frequencies of three FGA tagSNPs in schizophrenic patients and healthy controls. Between schizophrenic patients and controls, no significant difference was observed in genotype distributions of the three tagSNPs (all ). With regard to allele frequencies of the three tagSNPs, we found no significant differences between schizophrenic patients and healthy controls (all ). In addition, inheritance modeling did not show significant differences in genotype frequency distributions between two cases and control for all three tagSNPs (all ).

Table 2: Comparison of allele frequencies and genotype distributions of three FGA tagSNPs between schizophrenic patients and healthy controls.

tagSN
Group
Genotypic association (%)
Allelic association (%)

1/1
1/2
2/2

1
2

rs2070011
SCZ (1144)

332
586
226
1.28
0.528
1250
1038
0.36
0.550

(29.0)
(51.2)
(19.8)
(54.6)
(45.4)

NC (1007)
272
538
197
1082
932

(27.0)
(53.4)
(19.6)
(53.7)
(46.3)

rs2070016
SCZ (1139)

33
318
788
4.10
0.128
384
1894
0.35
0.554

(2.9)
(27.9)
(69.2)
(16.9)
(83.1)

NC (966)
19
301
646
339
1593

(2.0)
(31.1)
(66.9)
(17.5)
(82.5)

rs2070022
SCZ (1144)

845
277
22
1.23
0.541
1967
321
1.22
0.269

(73.9)
(24.2)
(1.9)
(86.0)
(14.0)

NC (1002)
760
226
16
1746
258

(75.8)
(22.6)
(1.6)
(87.1)
(12.9)

alleles of rs2070011 are A and G, the alleles of rs2070016 are C and T, and the alleles of rs2070022 are C and T.

: schizophrenia; NC: normal control.

3.3. The Haplotype Analysis

The LD patterns of the three FGA SNPs are shown in Figure 1. The three tagSNPs were in LD. In view of the strong linkage disequilibrium in the present subjects, only eight 3-SNP common haplotypes (rs2070011, rs2070016, and rs2070022) were estimated to have a frequency of >1%. There were no significant differences observed in overall haplotype frequencies between schizophrenic patients and healthy controls (global , df = 6, and ) through 10,000 permutation corrections. In addition, we did not notice significant differences in individual haplotypes between cases and controls (ACC: , ; ATC: , ; ATT: , ; GCC: , ; GCT: , ; GTC: , ; and GTT: , ).

Figure 1: Linkage disequilibrium (LD) of three FGA tagSNPs. The linkage disequilibrium (LD) between pairwise SNPs, using (left, red color) and (right, gray color) values, is shown for all subjects. High levels of LD are represented by increasing scale intensity from 0 to 100, as shown by the bars.

3.4. The Power Analysis

Our sample had a power of 0.90–0.99 for rs2070011, 0.30–0.99 for rs2070016, and 0.22–0.99 for rs2070022, respectively, to reveal an association of FGA tagSNPs and schizophrenia. We examined dominant, recessive, and log-additive polymorphic inheritance in schizophrenia with an odds ratio (OR) ranging from 1.4 to 2.0 (, two-tailed test).

4. Discussion

A number of studies have revealed the association between variants of a list of genes and schizophrenia [11]. To date, the association of FGA variants with schizophrenia little has been reported. FGA encodes the alpha component of fibrinogen that is a blood-borne glycoprotein comprising three pairs of nonidentical polypeptide chains. To our knowledge, this is the first study that investigated the association of FGA variants and schizophrenia in the Chinese Han population in Northeast China. Our findings suggested that FGA polymorphisms might not be associated with the susceptibility to schizophrenia.

At present, our study did not observe a significant association of FGA polymorphisms and schizophrenia. This is consistent with the results from previous studies. For example, in the study by Liu et al. [12], no significant difference was obtained when the number of core unit repeats of an FGA short tandem repeat (STR) polymorphism was compared between schizophrenia patients and healthy controls. Jungerius et al. [13] also reported negative associations of FGA variants and schizophrenia (, by rs2070022; , by rs2070016). In view of the relatively large sample size and our high statistical power, these results from our study were reliable and accurate and repeatable. However, the negative findings for the three possibly functional FGA SNPs are beyond our expectation that the FPA has the potential clinical diagnostic value as a biomarker of schizophrenia. One of the explanations causing this discrepancy is that epigenetic regulation may play important roles in the formation and development of FPA [14]. More specifically, various environmental factors, particularly when occurring during development, have been claimed to produce long-lasting epigenetic changes at the FGA gene, thereby affecting availability and function of FPA [15]. However, this is only our speculation and further detailed investigations need to be explored.

Our study has three major limitations. First, our study had eliminated genotyping errors and chance or failure of the assumptions of HWE owing to departure from HWE. Thus, the explanation of the association between FGA variants and schizophrenia was rational [16–18]. Second, our present study only genotyped three FGA tagSNPs, nevertheless, in view of the fact that the total FGA variants contain more than 500 polymorphic loci. Hence, it is necessary to fine-map FGA to identify schizophrenia-associated FGA SNPs. Third, although our previous study detected FPA serum levels from patients with schizophrenia, we did not note enough data information. Thus, we cannot carry out further analyses to evaluate the role of the selected SNPs in FPA serum levels.

5. Conclusions

To sum up, the present study did not provide evidences to support the fact that FGA variants might influence the susceptibility to schizophrenia in the Han Chinese population from Northeast China. However, the current association findings remain preliminary until replicated in other independent larger samples in different ethnicities.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that no financial competing interests exist.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Norman Bethune Program of Jilin University 2015227, the National Natural Science Foundation of China (30901229 and 81673253), the Young Scholars Program of Norman Bethune Health Science Center of Jilin University (no. 2013202018), the Young Program of Jilin Provincial Health Department (2014Q027), and the Graduate Innovation Fund of Jilin University (2016217).

References

R. Tandon, M. S. Keshavan, and H. A. Nasrallah, “Schizophrenia, ‘just the facts’ what we know in 2008. 2. Epidemiology and etiology,” Schizophrenia Research, vol. 102, no. 1–3, pp. 1–18, 2008.

H. Y. Chong, S. L. Teoh, D. B.-C. Wu, S. Kotirum, C.-F. Chiou, and N. Chaiyakunapruk, “Global economic burden of schizophrenia: a systematic review,” Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, vol. 12, pp. 357–373, 2016.

R. Tandon, M. S. Keshavan, and H. A. Nasrallah, “Schizophrenia, ‘just the facts’: what we know in 2008. Part 1: overview,” Schizophrenia Research, vol. 100, no. 1-3, pp. 4–19, 2008.

N. Zhou, J. Wang, Y. Yu et al., “Mass spectrum analysis of serum biomarker proteins from patients with schizophrenia,” Biomedical Chromatography, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 654–659, 2014.

C. Jurinke, P. Oeth, and D. van den Boom, “MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry: a versatile tool for high-performance DNA analysis,” Molecular Biotechnology, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 147–163, 2004.

S. Gabriel, L. Ziaugra, and D. Tabbaa, “SNP genotyping using the Sequenom MassARRAY iPLEX platform,” Current Protocols in Human Genetics, chapter 2, unit 2-12, 2009.

Y. Gu, X. Liu, Y. Yu et al., “Association of ATM gene polymorphism with PTC metastasis in female patients,” International Journal of Endocrinology, vol. 2014, Article ID 370825, 7 pages, 2014.

J. C. Barrett, B. Fry, J. Maller, and M. J. Daly, “Haploview: analysis and visualization of LD and haplotype maps,” Bioinformatics, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 263–265, 2005.

F. Dudbridge, “Likelihood-based association analysis for nuclear families and unrelated subjects with missing genotype data,” Human Heredity, vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 87–98, 2008.

W. J. Gauderman, “Sample size requirements for association studies of gene-gene interaction,” American Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 155, no. 5, pp. 478–484, 2002.

N. C. Allen, S. Bagade, M. B. McQueen et al., “Systematic meta-analyses and field synopsis of genetic association studies in schizophrenia: the SzGene database,” Nature Genetics, vol. 40, no. 7, pp. 827–834, 2008.

H. Liu, W. Yu, X. Wang et al., “Number of STR repeats as a potential new quantitative genetic marker for complex diseases, illustrated by schizophrenia,” Biochemical Genetics, vol. 45, no. 9-10, pp. 683–689, 2007.

B. J. Jungerius, M. L. C. Hoogendoorn, S. C. Bakker et al., “An association screen of myelin-related genes implicates the chromosome 22q11 PIK4CA gene in schizophrenia,” Molecular Psychiatry, vol. 13, no. 11, pp. 1060–1068, 2008.

N. Tsankova, W. Renthal, A. Kumar, and E. J. Nestler, “Epigenetic regulation in psychiatric disorders,” Nature Reviews Neuroscience, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 355–367, 2007.

C. Faulk and D. C. Dolinoy, “Timing is everything: the when and how of environmentally induced changes in the epigenome of animals,” Epigenetics, vol. 6, no. 7, pp. 791–797, 2011.

O. Mayo, “A century of Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium,” Twin Research and Human Genetics, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 249–256, 2008.

M. Li and C. Li, “Assessing departure from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium in the presence of disease association,” Genetic Epidemiology, vol. 32, no. 7, pp. 589–599, 2008.

J. K. Wittke-Thompson, A. Pluzhnikov, and N. J. Cox, “Rational inferences about departures from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium,” American Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 76, no. 6, pp. 967–986, 2005.