Disease Markers
Volume 2021 (2021), Article ID 8897906, 11 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8897906

Research Article

The Role, Function, and Mechanism of Long Intergenic Noncoding RNA1184 (linc01184) in Colorectal Cancer

Yan-Xia Sui,¹ Dong-Li Zhao,² Yan Yu,³ and Lin-Chuan Wang⁴

¹Department of Pathology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Yan Ta Road No 277, Xi’an, Shaanxi Province 710061, China
²Department of Radiotherapy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Yan Ta Road No 277, Xi’an, Shaanxi Province 710061, China
³Inspection Department of Hong-Hui Hospital, Xi’an Jiaotong University College of Medicine, Nan Guo Road No 76, Xi’an, Shaanxi Province 710041, China
⁴Department of Clinical Laboratory, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Yan Ta Road No 277, Xi’an, Shaanxi Province 710061, China

Correspondence should be addressed to Yan Yu; yu.yan74@163.com and Lin-Chuan Wang; wang_linchuan@163.com

Received 24 August 2020; Accepted 21 January 2021; Published 30 January 2021

Academic Editor: Roberta Rizzo

Copyright © 2021 Yan-Xia Sui et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

Background. Long intergenic noncoding RNA1184 (linc01184) has been recently discovered; however, its role in human diseases is limited to date. The present study is aimed at investigating the expression pattern and mechanism of linc01184 in colorectal cancer (CRC) tumorigenesis. Methods. The expression of linc01184 in CRC tissues and cell lines was compared with that in normal controls. The functions of linc01184 in CRC cells were identified by overexpression and small interfering RNA (siRNA) approaches in vitro. Meanwhile, the target gene prediction software, luciferase reporter, RNA pull-down, and western blotting assays were used to analyze the oncogenic mechanism. Results. We found that linc01184 was obviously upregulated in CRC tissues and cells when compared to normal controls, and its upregulation had a positive association with the CRC progression. linc01184 knockdown significantly suppressed CRC cell proliferation and invasion and promoted apoptosis. Besides, linc01184 acted as a competitive endogenous RNA (ceRNA) by directly binding to microRNA-331 (miR-331), and its overexpression resulted in notable increases of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), phosphorylated Ser/Thr kinases (p-Akt), and extracellular regulated protein kinase 1/2 (p-ERK1/2) at posttranscriptional levels in CRC cells, which were antagonized by miR-331. Conclusions. The findings reveal for the first time that linc01184 is an enhancer for the proliferation and invasion of CRC by functioning as a ceRNA through the linc01184-miR-331-HER2-p-Akt/ERK1/2 pathway regulatory network.

1. Introduction

Colorectal cancer (CRC), which is a multifactorial (such as smoking, drinking, and inadequate fiber and vitamin D intake) [1], multistep (adenocarcinoma sequence) [2] disease, is the third frequent and the second leading cause of death in cancer, accounting for approximately 1.80 million cases and 862,000 deaths in 2018 globally [3]. At present, CRC screening programs include carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and fecal occult blood test annually, flexible sigmoidoscopy every 5 years, or colonoscopy every 10 years for the average risk individuals at age 50 to 75 years [4–7]. However, these methods have either low sensitivity or specificity or low utilization/adherence rates; their clinical applications have been limited. Numerous regulatory noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs), such as microRNAs (miRNAs) [8–13] and long or large noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) [14–21], have established the differential expression in CRC progression and, thus, can be used as a diagnostic tool or prognostic biomarker for CRC (Table 1).

Table 1: Regulatory ncRNAs associated with CRC.

Regulatory ncRNAs
Cytoband
Expression
Mode of action and references

MicroRNAs (miRNAs)

miR-34a
1p36.22
Decreased
Regulates p53 gene expression [8]

miR-610
11p14.1
Decreased
Targets hepatoma-derived growth factor (HDGF) [9]

miR-187
18q12.2
Decreased
Targets transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β) [10]

miR-374a
Xq13.2
Decreased
Reducing cyclin D1 (CCND1) to inactivate the PI3K/Akt pathway [11]

miR-363-3p
Xq26.2
Decreased
Inhibits epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) [12]

miR-15a/16
13q14.2
Decreased
Modulates the expression of genes controlling cell cycle progression [13]

Long or large noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs)

Colorectal cancer-associated lncRNA (CCAL)
3q29
Elevated
Activates Wnt signaling [14]

Colon cancer-associated transcript-1-long isoform (CCAT1-L)
8q24.21
Elevated
Regulates chromatin interactions at v-MYC avian myelocytomatosis viral oncogene homolog (MYC) [15]

Colorectal neoplasia differentially expressed (CRNDE)
16q12.2
Elevated
Responds to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling [16]

HOX transcript antisense intergenic RNA (HOTAIR)
12q13.13
Elevated
Functions as a positive moderator of EMT [17]

lincRNA-p21
6p21.2
Decreased
Activated by p53 and modulates heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein K (hnRNP-K) [18]

Metastasis-associated lung adenocarcinoma transcript 1 (MALAT1)
11q13.1
Elevated
Promotes EMT and activates Wnt signaling [19]

Maternally expressed gene 3 (MEG3)
14q32
Decreased
Serve as p53 regulators [20]

H19
11p15.5
Elevated
Acts as precursor of miR-675 to regulate retinoblastoma gene expression and participates EMT [21]

The miRNAs (18~24 nt) can affect the expression of approximately 60% of protein-coding genes and act as negative regulators in cancers by binding the 3 untranslated region (3UTR) of the target mRNA [22–24]. The lncRNAs (>200 nt), which can be divided into the sense, antisense, bidirectional, intronic lncRNAs, and large intergenic ncRNAs (lincRNAs), have been implicated to interact with DNA, RNA, and protein, exerting almost all aspects of gene regulation via the molecular mechanisms of signal, decoy, guides, scaffold, and so on [24–27]. In the oncogenesis of CRC, numerous decoy lncRNAs (such as colon cancer-associated transcript-1 (MALAT1) [19], urothelial carcinoma-associated 1 (UCA1) [28], and H19 [29]) have been identified to function as competing endogenous RNAs (ceRNAs) or RNA sponges by binding miRNA and reduce the latter action on mRNA. linc01184, which is located on chromosome 5q23.3, is a newly discovered lincRNA and associated with the racial-specific erythrocyte traits [30]; however, its potential role in CRC and other cancers is still unknown. Our previous study has indicated that miR-331 is a CRC suppressor by targeting HER2 [31]. Meanwhile, we have also observed that linc01184 contains a complementary sequence for the seed region of miR-331. Thus, we perform the study to identify whether linc01184 acts as a contributor to CRC carcinogenesis by the interaction with miR-331.

In the present study, we demonstrated that linc01184 overexpression was a characteristic molecular change in CRC and had a close association with the progression of CRC. We further explored the biological roles of linc01184 in CRC cell lines in vitro and confirmed its oncogenic mechanism that linc01184 may function as a ceRNA to sponge miR-331, subsequently upregulating the expression of its target HER2 and triggering off the activation of p-Akt/p-ERK1/2 signaling pathways at the posttranscriptional levels. Thus, this study provided the first evidence that linc01184 may be a potential biomarker and play a carcinogenic role in the progression of CRC.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Tissue Samples and Cell Lines

Paired CRC and adjacent normal tissue samples were obtained from 247 patients (average age: years) who underwent radical resection of CRC but without any other therapeutic interventions at the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University between 2010 and 2014. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Hospital and was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. All patients provided written informed consent before the study, and their information was kept anonymous in the study.

Samples were collected and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80°C until total RNA extraction. The pathological stage was appraised by an experienced pathologist using the American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union for International Cancer Control (AJCC/UICC) tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging system [15]. Six CRC cell lines (HCT-116, LoVo, HT-29, SW480, DLD-1, and Caco2) and one human normal colon epithelial cell line (CRL-1831) were obtained from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) (Manassas, VA, USA). All cells were authenticated by Beijing Genomics Institute (Shenzhen, China) based on 8 short tandem repeat (STR) loci using the ABI GeneAmp®9700 PCR system (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA). The cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) (Gibco-BRL, Gaithersburg, MD, USA) at 37°C in a humidified 5% CO₂ incubator.

2.2. RNA Extraction and Real-Time Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-qPCR)

Total RNA from tissue samples and cells was extracted by the TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), and 1000 ng total RNA was converted to cDNA in a final volume of 10 μL using the One-Step SuperScript III RT reagent kit (Invitrogen) following the manufacturer’s protocol. The reverse transcription procedures were as follows: 45°C for 30 min and 85°C for 15 sec, and then held at 4°C. RT-qPCR was performed to determine the levels of linc01184, miR-331, and HER2 by the SYBR Green qPCR Master Mix (Thermo Fisher, Shanghai, China). All primers (Table 2) were synthesized by RiBoBio Co., Ltd. (Guangzhou, China), and U6 or β-actin (RiBoBio) was used as the internal reference. The RT-qPCR was conducted at 94°C for 3 min and followed by 40 cycles of 94°C for 10 sec, 55°C for 35 sec, and 55°C for 25 sec. The experiment was performed in triplicate and repeated three times; the relative levels of linc01184 and miR-331 were assessed using the 2-ΔΔCt method as described previously [16].

Table 2: The primer sequences included in this study.

Genes
Forward primer ()
Reverse primer ()

Human-HER2
GGTCTTGATCCAGCGGAACC
AGCGGTTGGTGTCTATCAGT

linc01184
CACCATCGTTTGCTGAACACT
CCGCTTGCACCTTATCTCACTA

miR-331
GCCCCUGGGCCUAUCCUAGAA
Universal qPCR primer

U6
CTCGCTTCGGCAGCACA
Universal qPCR primer

β-Actin
CTCCATCCTGGCCTCGCTGT
GCTGTCACCTTCACCGTTCC

2.3. Cell Transfection

The scramble control RNA and siRNA specific to linc01184 were obtained from RiBoBio. Then, the scramble control RNA and 5, 10, 20, 40, and 80 nM siRNA, respectively, were transfected into SW480 and HCT-116 cells using lipofectamine 3000 (Invitrogen) under the manufacturer’s procedure.

2.4. Cell Proliferation Assay

The proliferation of SW480 and HCT-116 cells transfected by scramble control RNA or siRNA was assessed by the Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8; Sigma). Briefly, the transfected cells (/well) were seeded into a 96-well plate (ExcellBio, Taicang, Jiangsu, China) and incubated for 24 h. Then, 10 μL CCK-8 solution was added into each well and cultured for 4 h at 37°C with 5% CO₂. Finally, the cell viability (%) was calculated on the basis of the optical densities (ODs) at 450 nm wavelength.

2.5. Cell Invasion Assay

The HCT-116 and SW480 cells (/well) transfected with scramble control RNA or siRNA were added to the Transwell (Corning Incorporated, NY, USA) and cultured for 48 h. After washing five times, the Transwell was placed in a 24-well plate (ExcellBio), and the cells were fixed with 95% alcohol for 10 min. After removing alcohol, the cells were stained with 0.1% crystal violet (Sigma-Aldrich, Castle Hill, NSW, Australia) for 30 min. The cell invasion was observed under an inverted microscope (Leica MZ8, Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany) at ×10 magnification.

2.6. Constructions of Plasmid Vectors and Luciferase Reporter Gene Vectors

Full-length linc01184 and wild-type (WT) and mutant (MUT) linc01184 were all synthesized by RiBoBio. In accordance with the manufacturer’s procedure, they were cloned into pCDNA3.1 (Invitrogen) and pGL3 luciferase reporter plasmid (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) to construct the pCDNA-linc01184, luci-linc01184-WT, and luci-linc01184-MUT, respectively.

2.7. Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay

The luci-linc01184-WT or luci-linc01184-MUT and miR-331 mimic or negative control (NC) mimic (RiBoBio) were cotransfected into HCT-116 cells by lipofectamine 3000 (Invitrogen), and the luciferase activity of the transfected cells was evaluated by a dual-luciferase reporter assay kit (Promega). All experiments were conducted according to the manufacturer’s protocols.

2.8. RNA Pull-Down Assay

The biotin-labeled WT and MUT miR-331 which are obtained from Invitrogen Corporation were transfected into HCT-116 cells using lipofectamine 3000 (Invitrogen). Then, the enrichment of linc01184 in transfected cells was measured by the RNA pull-down kit (Promega) in accordance with the manufacturer’s protocol.

2.9. Apoptosis Assay

The HCT-116 cells which are transfected with scramble control RNA, siRNA, pCDNA-linc01184, miR-331 inhibitor (RiBoBio), and siRNA+miR-331 inhibitor, respectively, were added to a 24-well plate and cultured for 48 h. The apoptosis of harvesting cells was evaluated by the FITC-Annexin V apoptosis detection kit (BD Biosciences, Piscataway, NJ, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

2.10. Western Blotting Assay

Using the mammalian protein extraction reagent (Pierce, Rockford, IL, USA), the total proteins were extracted from HCT-116 cell lysates that are transfected with 1 μg/mL pcDNA-linc01184, 20 nM siRNA, 60 nM miR-331 inhibitor, and siRNA+miR-331 inhibitor, respectively. The protein concentration was measured by a Bio-Rad protein assay kit (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). Then, the protein was separated using 10% SDS-PAGE and transferred to a 0.22 μm nitrocellulose membrane (Bio-Rad). The membrane was incubated with anti-HER2, anti-Akt, anti-p-Akt, anti-ERK1/2, and anti-p-ERK1/2 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA) at 4°C overnight. Then, the horseradish peroxidase- (HRP-) labeled goat anti-mouse IgG (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) was added, and the membrane was incubated for 1 h. The β-actin (RiBoBio) was used as the reference protein.

2.11. Statistical Analysis

An independent-sample -test, chi-squared test, and Kruskal-Wallis rank test (one-way ANOVA) were used to analyze the data by SPSS 13.0 (serial number 5026743; SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA). A value < 0.05 (two-tailed) was considered to be statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. linc01184 Was Highly Expressed in CRC Tissues and in Cell Lines

To investigate the role of linc01184 in CRC, the RT-qPCR was used to measure linc01184 expression in CRC and normal controls. We found that linc01184 expression in CRC tissues was significantly higher than that in adjacent normal tissues ( vs. , ) (Figure 1(a)). Using the median (2.43) as a cut-off, 137 CRC patients were defined as high linc01184 expression cases. Among them, linc01184 overexpression had a significant association with the tumor size, invasion for lymph node and depth, metastasis, differentiated type, and TNM stage (all ) but was not significantly correlated with age, sex, and tumor location (all ) (Table 3). Furthermore, linc01184 expression in six CRC cell lines was 2-3 times of that in the normal colon epithelial cell line (CRL-1831), (Figure 1(b)). The findings indicated that linc01184 upregulation may play an oncogenic role in the progression of CRC.

(a)

(b)

Figure 1: linc01184 expression in both tissues and cell lines by RT-qPCR. (a) Compared with the adjacent normal tissue, linc01184 expression was highly upregulated in colorectal cancer (CRC) tissue; (b) linc01184 expression in CRC cell lines (HCT-116, LoVo, HT-29, SW480, DLD-1, and Caco2) was significantly higher than that in a normal colon epithelial cell line (CRL-1831). vs. normal tissue or CRL-1831.

Table 3: Correlation between linc01184 expression and pathological parameters in CRC.

Parameters
No. of patients
linc01184 high expression
value
value

Age

0.158
0.691

    ≤60
117
62

    >60
130
75

Sex

0.136
0.712

    Male
149
80

    Female
98
57

Tumor size

3.99
0.046

    ≤5 cm
171
81

    >5 cm
76
56

Location

0.146
0.702

    Colon
167
90

    Rectum
80
47

Lymph node invasion

7.871
0.005

    Negative
145
60

    Positive
102
77

Depth of invasion

4.410
0.036

    T1-T2
79
30

    T3-T4
168
107

TNM stage

12.007
0.001

    I/II
115
39

    III/IV
132
98

Differentiated type

6.310
0.012

    High/moderate
150
65

    Poor
97
72

Metastasis

4.475
0.034

    Negative
203
100

    Positive
44
37

Note: .

3.2. linc01184 Knockdown Significantly Inhibited CRC Cell Proliferation and Invasion

Furthermore, loss of function assay through RNA interference was performed to elucidate the effect of linc01184 on the CRC cells in vitro. We found that compared with the treatment of scramble control, the abilities of linc01184 expression (Figure 2(a)), cell viability (Figure 2(b)), and invasion (Figure 2(c)) in HCT-116 and SW480 cells were obviously weakened by siRNA through a dose-dependent manner. For both linc01184 expression and cell growth, the highest inhibition efficiency can be obtained at ≥20 nM siRNA. Thus, the experiments in vitro demonstrated the biological functions of linc01184 on facilitating the proliferation and invasion of CRC cells.

(a)

(b)

(c)

Figure 2: Loss of function to elucidate the effects of linc01184 on the growth of CRC cells in vitro. (a) linc01184 expression in HCT-116 and SW480 cells was significantly inhibited when transfected with siRNA; (b) CCK-8 assay showed that the cell viability in HCT-116 and SW480 cells was significantly decreased by siRNA; (c) the images under an inverted microscope showed that the invasion in HCT-116 and SW480 cells can be significantly inhibited by siRNA. vs. scramble control; # vs. 5 nM siRNA; & vs. 10 nM siRNA.

3.3. linc01184 Directly Targeted miR-331 and Acted as ceRNA in CRC Cell

To verify that miR-331 (NR_029895) might be a potential target of linc01184 (NR_015360), the sequences from NCBI (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) were analyzed by the RNAHybrid 2.2 software. TargetScan revealed that linc01184 contains complementary sites for the seed region of miR-331 (Figure 3(a)). To further investigate the interaction between linc01184 and miR-331, the luci-linc01184-WT (AUGGGAGUUCAGGGGCU) and MUT (AUGGGAGUUCCCCCCAU) were constructed () (Figure 3(b)). Meanwhile, the luci-linc01184-WT or MUT and miR-331 mimic or NC mimic were cotransfected into HCT-116 cells; the dual-luciferase reporter assay showed that the activity of luci-linc01184-WT could be significantly inhibited by miR-331 (Figure 3(c)). Moreover, the RNA pull-down assay was conducted in HCT-116 cells transfected with miR-331-WT and MUT probes; the results revealed that linc01184 was dramatically enriched by the miR-331-WT probe (Figure 3(d)).

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

Figure 3: linc01184 directly targeted miR-331 and acted as ceRNA of miR-331 in CRC cells. (a) The prediction of the binding region between linc01184 and miR-331; (b) the sequence of wild-type (WT) and mutant (MUT) linc01184 luciferase reporters; (c) dual-luciferase reporter assay revealed that linc01184 directly targeted miR-331, vs. luci-linc01184-MUT or negative control (NC) mimic; (d) the analysis of enrichment between linc01184 and miR-331 probes using the RNA pull-down assay, vs. control probe or miR-331 mutant (MUT) probe; (e) linc01184 expression in transfected HCT-116 cells, vs. empty vector, # vs. 0.5 μg/mL pCDNA-linc01184; (f) miR-331 expression in transfected HCT-116 cell, vs. empty vector or scramble control.

In addition, the RT-qPCR assay showed that the highest linc01184 expression can be obtained at ≥1 μg/mL pCDNA-linc01184 transfection in HCT-116 cells, with about three times of expression compared to empty vector (Figure 3(e)). Thus, 1 μg/mL pCDNA-linc01184 and 20 nM siRNA were used to evaluate the effect of linc01184 on the miR-331 expression. The data showed that linc01184 overexpression significantly repressed miR-331 expression, which was promoted when silencing linc01184 (Figure 3(f)). Our findings indicated that linc01184 directly targeted miR-331 and acted as a ceRNA by sponging miR-331.

3.4. linc01184 Upregulated HER2 and Inhibited Apoptosis in CRC Cell

The target relationship between miR-331 and HER2 has been identified in our previous study [31]. Thus, to explore the effect of linc01184 on HER2 expression and apoptosis, HCT-116 cells were transfected with scramble control, 1 μg/mL pCDNA-linc01184, 20 nM siRNA, 60 nM miR-331 inhibitor, and combination of siRNA and miR-331 inhibitor, respectively. We found that linc01184 overexpression or miR-331 downregulation resulted in a significant upregulation of HER2 (Figures 4(a) and 4(b)) and inhibition of apoptosis (Figure 4(c)), which were abolished by siRNA. However, the effect of siRNA on both HER2 expression and apoptosis in HCT-116 cells can be antagonized by miR-331 inhibitor (Figure 4). The results identified the functions of linc01184 on HER2 upregulation and inhibiting CRC cell apoptosis via competing with miR-331.

(a)

(b)

(c)

Figure 4: The change of HER2 protein level expression and cell apoptosis in HCT-116 cells under various conditions. (a) Western blot showed that linc01184 overexpression (pCDNA-linc01184 transfection) or miR-331 downregulation (miR-331 inhibitor transfection) significantly enhanced HER2 expression, which was abolished by siRNA; however, the effect of siRNA on HER2 expression can be antagonized by miR-331 inhibitor; (b) fold change of HER2 was significantly increased by linc01184 overexpression or miR-331 downregulation, which was opposite to siRNA transfection; (c) linc01184 overexpression or miR-331 downregulation significantly suppressed CRC cell apoptosis. vs. scramble control.

3.5. linc01184 Promoted the Akt/ERK1/2 Signaling Pathways in CRC Cell

To further examine whether linc01184 is involved in HER2 downstream signaling pathways, the phosphorylation levels of Ser/Thr kinases (p-Akt) and extracellular regulated protein kinase 1/2 (p-ERK1/2) under various conditions were analyzed in the present study. As presented in Figure 5(a), the protein levels of Akt and ERK1/2 are almost unchanged in HCT-116 cells transfected with 1 μg/mL pCDNA-linc01184, 20 nM siRNA, 60 nM miR-331 inhibitor, or combination of siRNA and miR-331 inhibitor. However, linc01184 overexpression or miR-331 downregulation resulted in notable increases of p-Akt and p-ERK1/2 protein levels, which was opposite to siRNA transfection. The results were also been verified in Figure 5(b) that pCDNA-linc01184 or miR-331 inhibitor transfections significantly increased the ratios of both p-Akt/Akt and p-ERK1/2/ERK1/2 with respect to scramble control transfection, which were both decreased by siRNA transfection (all ). Furthermore, cotransfection of siRNA and miR-331 inhibitor presented no effect on the protein levels of p-Akt and p-ERK1/2 (Figures 5(a) and 5(b)). Collectively, the results suggested that linc01184 overexpression triggered off the activation of p-Akt and p-ERK1/2 signals in CRC cells, which was antagonized by miR-331.

(a)

(b)

Figure 5: The changes of Akt and ERK1/2 protein levels in HCT-116 cells under various conditions. (a) linc01184 overexpression or miR-331 downregulation resulted in notable upregulations of p-Akt and p-ERK1/2 protein levels, which were abolished by siRNA; (b) the fold changes of p-Akt/Akt and p-ERK1/2/ERK1/2 were significantly increased by linc01184 overexpression or miR-331 downregulation. vs. scramble control.

4. Discussion

The studies of human genomes have revealed that <2% of the genomes are protein-coding genes, while many noncoding elements are transcribed into ncRNAs, yielding tens of thousands of lncRNAs that lack protein-coding capacity [32–34]. Until now, only a limited number of lncRNAs are well understood for their functions; however, it is very clear that lncRNAs can play abundantly regulatory and functional roles in multiple biological processes. In cancers, lncRNAs execute their molecular functions through diverse mechanisms, such as the roles of scaffolds in chromatin remodeling [35, 36], enhancer RNA (eRNA) in chromatin interactions [37, 38], ceRNAs to sponge miRNAs [39], and natural antisense transcript (NAT) [40].

linc01184 is a newly discovered intergenic lncRNA with ~3.0 kb length, but its biological function in human diseases is limited to date. In the study, we investigated the linc01184 expression profiles in CRC, the results revealed that linc01184 was significantly upregulated in both CRC tissues and cell lines in comparison with normal controls, and its upregulation was closely associated with tumor size, invasion, metastasis, differentiation, and TNM stage of CRC. Meanwhile, siRNA-mediated linc01184 knockdown significantly inhibited CRC cell proliferation and invasion and enhanced apoptosis in vitro. These results led us to believe that linc01184 may play a carcinogenic role and is a potential biomarker in the progression of CRC.

HER2 belongs to the human epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) family and is an oncogenic driver to be well used as the marker of prognosis and therapeutic target in ovarian [41] and breast cancers [42]; it also plays a key factor in CRC [43]. Moreover, increasing evidences have demonstrated that lncRNAs can regulate the miRNA’s expression as a ceRNA in multiple cancers, including CRC [44–46]. Our previous study has identified that miR-331 was a CRC suppressor by targeting HER2 to inhibit p-Akt/p-ERK1/2 signals [31]. Due to the expression pattern and biological function of linc01184 being opposite to those of miR-331 in CRC, thus, we hypothesized a mechanism that linc01184 may act as ceRNA to control the expression of HER2-p-Akt/p-ERK1/2 via sponging miR-331 in the development of CRC.

To validate the hypothesis of the present study, the target gene prediction software, luciferase reporter assay, and RNA pull-down assay were used to analyze the potential interactions between linc01184 and miR-331. We found that the seed sequence of miR-331 was perfectly matched with linc01184. Meanwhile, miR-331 significantly inhibited the activity of linc01184-fused luciferase and pulled down linc01184. We also found that miR-331 expression was inverse to linc01184 in CRC cells in vitro. Additionally, western blot and fold change analyses showed that linc01184 overexpression in CRC cells significantly increased protein levels of HER2, p-Akt, and p-ERK1/2, while silencing of linc01184 displayed the opposite effect. Moreover, the combined treatment of miR-331 inhibitor and siRNA-linc01184 indicated that miR-331 inhibitor could antagonize the anticancer effects of siRNA-linc01184 on cell apoptosis and deactivation of HER2/p-Akt/p-ERK1/2 signaling pathways. Therefore, the fact that linc01184 acted as ceRNA to control the expressions of HER2, p-Akt, and p-ERK1/2 at posttranscription levels via directly binding to miR-331 may be one of the potential mechanisms in CRC tumorigenesis.

5. Conclusions

In the current study, we identified linc01184 as a positive modulator and revealed its mechanism in CRC carcinogenesis for the first time. We found that linc01184 functioned as a ceRNA of miR-331 through the linc01184-miR-331-HER2-Akt/ERK1/2 pathway regulatory network, in which linc01184 suppressed the expression of miR-331, subsequently upregulated HER2, and stimulated the activation of Akt/ERK1/2 signals, thereby promoting CRC cell proliferation and invasion.

Abbreviations

ncRNA: | Noncoding RNA
linc01184: | Large intergenic noncoding RNA1184
CRC: | Colorectal cancer
miR-331: | MicroRNA-331
HER2: | Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2
ceRNA: | Competitive endogenous RNA
Akt: | Ser/Thr kinase
ERK: | Extracellular regulated protein kinases
CEA: | Carcinoembryonic antigen
lncRNAs: | Long noncoding RNA
UCA1: | Urothelial carcinoma-associated 1
HOTAIR: | HOX transcript antisense RNA
HOTTIP: | Homeobox A transcript at the distal tip
GC: | Gastric cancer
AJCC/UICC: | American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union for International Cancer Control
DMEM: | Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium
TNM: | Tumor-node-metastasis
ATCC: | American Type Culture Collection
RT-qPCR: | Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction
siRNA: | Silence RNA
HRP: | Horseradish peroxidase.

Data Availability

The data used in the study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

YS, DZ, YY, and LW declare no financial or other conflicts of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

LW and YS were major contributors to the writing of the manuscript. YS, DZ, and LW were responsible for the study design. The statistical analysis and figure of the study were performed by YY. YS, DZ, YY, and LW have read and approved the final manuscript for publication in Disease Markers.

Acknowledgments

We thank all authors who have contributed significantly to the study and present an acknowledgment that all authors are in agreement with the content of the manuscript. This study was supported by grants from the Scientific and Technological Research Project of Shaanxi Province, China (No. 2016SF-174), and Natural Science Basic Research Program of Shaanxi Province, China (Nos. 2018SF-043 and 2019JM-364).

References

Y. Ma, Y. Yang, F. Wang et al., “Obesity and risk of colorectal cancer: a systematic review of prospective studies,” PLoS One, vol. 8, no. 1, article e53916, 2013.

J. W. Arends, “Molecular interactions in the Vogelstein model of colorectal carcinoma,” The Journal of Pathology, vol. 190, no. 4, pp. 412–416, 2000.

WHO, September 2018, https://wwwwhoint/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/cancer.

M. R. Z. Mohamad Amin Pourhoseingholi, “Colorectal cancer screening: time for action in Iran,” World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 82-83, 2012.

F. Bénard, A. N. Barkun, M. Martel, and D. Renteln, “Systematic review of colorectal cancer screening guidelines for average-risk adults: summarizing the current global recommendations,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 124–138, 2018.

S. J. K. J. Winawer, J. Krabshuis, R. Lambert, M. O'Brien, M. Fried, and World Gastroenterology Organization Guidelines Committee, “Cascade colorectal cancer screening guidelines,” Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 297–300, 2011.

S. Subramanian, M. Klosterman, M. M. Amonkar, and T. L. Hunt, “Adherence with colorectal cancer screening guidelines: a review,” Preventive Medicine, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 536–550, 2004.

T. C. Chang, E. A. Wentzel, O. A. Kent et al., “Transactivation of miR-34a by p53 broadly influences gene expression and promotes apoptosis,” Molecular Cell, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 745–752, 2007.

B. Sun, X. Gu, Z. Chen, and J. Xiang, “miR-610 inhibits cell proliferation and invasion in colorectal cancer by repressing hepatoma-derived growth factor,” American Journal of Cancer Research, vol. 5, no. 12, pp. 3635–3644, 2015.

F. Zhang, Y. Luo, Z. Shao et al., “MicroRNA-187, a downstream effector of TGFβ pathway, suppresses Smad-mediated epithelial-mesenchymal transition in colorectal cancer,” Cancer Letters, vol. 373, no. 2, pp. 203–213, 2016.

Y. Chen, J. Jiang, M. Zhao et al., “microRNA-374a suppresses colon cancer progression by directly reducing CCND1 to inactivate the PI3K/AKT pathway,” Oncotarget, vol. 7, no. 27, pp. 41306–41319, 2016.

F. Hu, J. Min, X. Cao et al., “miR-363-3p inhibits the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and suppresses metastasis in colorectal cancer by targeting Sox4,” Biochemical & Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 474, no. 1, pp. 35–42, 2016.

L. Shi, R. Jackstadt, H. Siemens, H. Li, T. Kirchner, and H. Hermeking, “p53-induced miR-15a/16-1 and AP4 form a double-negative feedback loop to regulate epithelial-mesenchymal transition and metastasis in colorectal cancer,” Cancer Research, vol. 74, no. 2, pp. 532–542, 2014.

Y. Ma, Y. Yang, F. Wang et al., “Long non-coding RNA CCAL regulates colorectal cancer progression by activating Wnt/β-catenin signalling pathway via suppression of activator protein 2α,” Gut, vol. 65, no. 9, pp. 1494–1504, 2016.

J. Xiang, Q. Yin, T. Chen et al., “Human colorectal cancer-specific CCAT1-L lncRNA regulates long-range chromatin interactions at the MYC locus,” Cell Research, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 513–531, 2014.

B. C. Ellis, L. D. Graham, and P. L. Molloy, “CRNDE, a long non-coding RNA responsive to insulin/IGF signaling, regulates genes involved in central metabolism,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1843, no. 2, pp. 372–386, 2014.

R. Kogo, T. Shimamura, K. Mimori et al., “Long noncoding RNA HOTAIR regulates polycomb-dependent chromatin modification and is associated with poor prognosis in colorectal cancers,” Cancer Research, vol. 71, no. 20, pp. 6320–6326, 2011.

H. Zhai, A. Fesler, K. Schee, Ø. Fodstad, K. Flatmark, and J. Ju, “Clinical significance of long intergenic noncoding RNA-p21 in colorectal cancer,” Clinical Colorectal Cancer, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 261–266, 2013.

C. Xu, M. Yang, J. Tian, X. Wang, and Z. Li, “MALAT-1: a long non-coding RNA and its important 3 end functional motif in colorectal cancer metastasis,” International Journal of Oncology, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 169–175, 2011.

D. D. Yin, Z. J. Liu, E. Zhang, R. Kong, Z. H. Zhang, and R. H. Guo, “Decreased expression of long noncoding RNA MEG3 affects cell proliferation and predicts a poor prognosis in patients with colorectal cancer,” Tumor Biology, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 4851–4859, 2015.

W. P. Tsang, E. K. O. Ng, S. S. M. Ng et al., “Oncofetal H19-derived miR-675 regulates tumor suppressor RB in human colorectal cancer,” Carcinogenesis, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 350–358, 2010.

E. Berezikov and R. H. Plasterk, “Camels and zebrafish, viruses and cancer: a microRNA update,” Human Molecular Genetics, vol. 14, Supplement 2, pp. R183–R190, 2005.

R. C. Friedman, K. K. Farh, C. B. Burge, and D. P. Bartel, “Most mammalian mRNAs are conserved targets of microRNAs,” Genome Research, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 92–105, 2009.

M. U. Kaikkonen, M. T. Lam, and C. K. Glass, “Non-coding RNAs as regulators of gene expression and epigenetics,” Cardiovascular Research, vol. 90, no. 3, pp. 430–440, 2011.

Y. Yang, P. Junjie, C. Sanjun, and Y. Ma, “Long non-coding RNAs in colorectal cancer: progression and future directions,” Journal of Cancer, vol. 8, no. 16, pp. 3212–3225, 2017.

M. Huarte, “The emerging role of lncRNAs in cancer,” Nature Medicine, vol. 21, no. 11, pp. 1253–1261, 2015.

J. Wei, K. Huang, C. Yang, and C. S. Kang, “Non-coding RNAs as regulators in epigenetics (review),” Oncology Reports, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 3–9, 2017.

Z. Bian, L. Jin, J. Zhang et al., “LncRNA--UCA1 enhances cell proliferation and 5-fluorouracil resistance in colorectal cancer by inhibiting miR-204-5p,” Scientific Reports, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 23892, 2016.

W. C. Liang, W. M. Fu, C. W. Wong et al., “The lncRNA H19 promotes epithelial to mesenchymal transition by functioning as miRNA sponges in colorectal cancer,” Oncotarget, vol. 6, no. 26, pp. 22513–22525, 2015.

C. J. J. D. Hodonsky, D. Jain, U. M. Schick et al., “Genome-wide association study of red blood cell traits in Hispanics/Latinos: the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos,” PLoS Genetics, vol. 13, no. 4, article e1006760, 2017.

D. ZHAO, Y. SUI, and X. ZHENG, “miR-331-3p inhibits proliferation and promotes apoptosis by targeting HER2 through the PI3K/Akt and ERK1/2 pathways in colorectal cancer,” Oncology Reports, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 1075–1082, 2016.

K. C. Wang and H. Y. Chang, “Molecular mechanisms of long noncoding RNAs,” Molecular Cell, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 904–914, 2011.

J. E. S. H. Wilusz, H. Sunwoo, and D. L. Spector, “Long noncoding RNAs: functional surprises from the RNA world,” Genes & Development, vol. 23, no. 13, pp. 1494–1504, 2009.

Y. F. M. J. Fang, “Roles, functions, and mechanisms of long non-coding RNAs in cancer,” Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics, vol. 14, pp. 42–54, 2016.

S. M. K. Nakano, K. Murakami, M. Meguro et al., “Expression profile of LIT1/KCNQ1OT1 and epigenetic status at the KvDMR1 in colorectal cancers,” Cancer Science, vol. 97, no. 11, pp. 1147–1154, 2006.

F. Z. M. Aguilo, M. M. Zhou, and M. J. Walsh, “Long noncoding RNA, polycomb, and the ghosts hauntingINK4b-ARF-INK4aexpression: figure 1,” Cancer Research, vol. 71, no. 16, pp. 5365–5369, 2011.

N. M. S. Hah, S. Murakami, A. Nagari, C. G. Danko, and W. L. Kraus, “Enhancer transcripts mark active estrogen receptor binding sites,” Genome Research, vol. 23, no. 8, pp. 1210–1223, 2013.

C. L. F. T. Hsieh, T. Fei, Y. Chen et al., “Enhancer RNAs participate in androgen receptor-driven looping that selectively enhances gene activation,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 111, no. 20, pp. 7319–7324, 2014.

X. S. M. Liu, M. Sun, F. Q. Nie et al., “Lnc RNA HOTAIR functions as a competing endogenous RNA to regulate HER2 expression by sponging miR-331-3p in gastric cancer,” Molecular Cancer, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 92–106, 2014.

S. Katayama, Y. Tomaru, T. Kasukawa et al., “Antisense transcription in the mammalian transcriptome,” Science, vol. 309, no. 5740, pp. 1564–1566, 2005.

A. W. J. Shang, J. Wu, F. Bi et al., “Relationship between HER2 and JAK/STAT-SOCS3 signaling pathway and clinicopathological features and prognosis of ovarian cancer,” Cancer Biology & Therapy, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 314–322, 2017.

A. N. Seo, H. J. Lee, E. J. Kim et al., “Expression of breast cancer stem cell markers as predictors of prognosis and response to trastuzumab in HER2-positive breast cancer,” British Journal of Cancer, vol. 114, no. 10, pp. 1109–1116, 2016.

E. J. Blok, P. J. K. Kuppen, J. E. M. van Leeuwen, and C. F. M. Sier, “Cytoplasmic overexpression of HER2: a key factor in colorectal cancer,” Clinical Medicine Insights: Oncology, vol. 7, no. 7, pp. 41–51, 2013.

Z. W. H. Liu, H. Wang, H. Cai et al., “Long non-coding RNA MIAT promotes growth and metastasis of colorectal cancer cells through regulation of miR-132/Derlin-1 pathway,” Cancer Cell International, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 59–69, 2018.

L. P. L. Salmena, L. Poliseno, Y. Tay, L. Kats, and P. P. Pandolfi, “A ceRNA Hypothesis: The Rosetta Stone of a Hidden RNA Language?” Cell, vol. 146, no. 3, pp. 353–358, 2011.

F. A. R. M. Karreth, M. Reschke, A. Ruocco et al., “The BRAF pseudogene functions as a competitive endogenous RNA and induces lymphoma in vivo,” Cell, vol. 161, no. 2, pp. 319–332, 2015.