Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine

Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 702914, 7 pages

http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/702914

Research Article

Quality of Life and Mental Health in Patients with Chronic Diseases Who Regularly Practice Yoga and Those Who Do Not: A Case-Control Study

Holger Cramer, Romy Lauche, Jost Langhorst, Gustav Dobos, and Anna Paul

Department of Internal and Integrative Medicine, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Faculty of Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen, Am Deimelsberg 34a, 45276 Essen, Germany

Received 19 March 2013; Revised 13 May 2013; Accepted 23 May 2013

Academic Editor: Arndt Büssing

Copyright © 2013 Holger Cramer et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

While clinical trials have shown evidence of efficacy of yoga in different chronic diseases, subjective health benefits associated with yoga practice under naturalistic conditions have not yet been investigated. The aim of this study was to investigate associations of regular yoga practice with quality of life and mental health in patients with chronic diseases. Using a case-control design, patients with chronic diseases who regularly practiced yoga were selected from a large observational study and compared to controls who did not regularly practice yoga and who were matched individually to each case on gender, main diagnosis, education, and age (within 5 years). Patients’ quality of life (SF-36 questionnaire), mental health (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), life satisfaction, and health satisfaction (Questionnaire for Life Satisfaction) were assessed. Patients who regularly practiced yoga () had a better general health status (), a higher physical functioning (), and physical component score () on the SF-36 than those who did not (). No group differences were found for the mental scales of the SF-36, anxiety, depression, life satisfaction, or health satisfaction. In conclusion, practicing yoga under naturalistic conditions seems to be associated with increased physical health but not mental health in chronically diseased patients.

1. Introduction

Yoga has its roots in Indian philosophy and has been a part of traditional Indian spiritual and medical practice for around 5000 years [1]. While the ultimate goal of traditional yoga has been described as uniting mind, body, and spirit, yoga has become a popular means to promote physical and mental well-being [1, 2]. As such, yoga has been adapted as part of complementary and alternative medicine in Western societies [3]. While yoga traditionally also comprises advice for ethical lifestyle and spiritual practice [1–4], it is most often associated with physical postures (asanas), breathing techniques (pranayama), and meditation (dhyana) in Western societies [2]. Different yoga schools have emerged that put varying focus on physical and mental practices [2]. However, even exercise-based yoga interventions differ from purely gymnastic exercises in that the yoga practitioner focuses his mind on the postures with inner awareness and a meditative focus of mind [5, 6].

Yoga is gaining increased popularity as a therapeutic practice. In 2008, about 15% of the American adult population was practicing yoga or was at least extremely interested in it [7]. Of those who were already practicing yoga, about half started practicing explicitly to improve their overall health, resulting in more than 13 million people practicing yoga for health reasons in 2007 [8, 9]. Worldwide, it is estimated that yoga is regularly practiced by about 30 million people [10].

Yoga has also been recognized as medical therapy; nearly 14 million Americans (6.1% of the population) reported that a physician or other therapist recommended yoga to them [7]. In the United Kingdom, yoga was even promoted by national health services as a safe and effective means to promote health in healthy and diseased individuals of all age groups [11].

Randomized-controlled trials and systematic reviews have investigated the efficacy of yoga in a number of physical conditions. It has been shown to improve health in patients with chronic low back pain [12], chronic neck pain [13], fibromyalgia [14], rheumatoid arthritis [15], osteoarthritis [15], cancer [16, 17], and menopausal symptoms [18]. It can reduce risk factors for cardiovascular disease [19] and improve risk profiles in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus [20].

It has, however, been shown that self-administered yoga practice outside of yoga courses is important for sustained health benefits [6, 21]. Moreover, patients participating in a randomized-controlled trial might not be totally representative of the patient population [22]. Therefore, while clinical trials are important to establish evidence of efficacy of yoga in chronic diseases, studies on differences between patients who practice yoga (outside of clinical trials) and those who do not seem warranted. The aim of this study was to investigate differences in quality of life and mental health in patients with chronic diseases who regularly practice yoga and those who do not use a case-control design. It was hypothesized that patients who regularly practiced yoga had higher health-related quality of life and mental health than those who did not.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Patients

Patients were recruited from a large observational study that was conducted at a German Department for Internal and Integrative Medicine as part of its ongoing quality assurance program. All patients admitted to the Department during a 3-year period received detailed study information and were invited to participate in the study. Adults (aged 18 or older) with chronic diseases of rheumatological, gastrointestinal, pulmonological, and cardiovascular origin, including those with chronic pain syndromes, were eligible. Prior to inpatient treatment, patients who were willing to participate signed informed consent forms and completed questionnaires on complementary therapies use, health-related quality of life, mental health, life and health satisfaction [23].

This reanalysis used a case-control design. Patients who reported to engage in regular yoga practice (at least once weekly for at least 20 minutes) were regarded as cases. Matched pairs were created by randomly assigning a control subject from all possible controls, that is, patients who did not report to regularly practice yoga and who were exactly matched individually to each case on gender, main diagnosis, and education and as close as possible on age (within 5 years).

2.2. Questionnaires

2.2.1. Yoga Practice and Sociodemographic Data

Patients were queried on whether they had ever practiced yoga before. Patients who reported prior yoga practice were further queried how often they were practicing yoga in a typical week (0 to 7 days per weeks) and whether they perceived yoga as helpful or harmful for their disease. Sociodemographic data on age, gender, family status, education, and employment were assessed. With respect to clinical data, ICD-10 diagnoses [24] were recorded.

2.2.2. Health-Related Quality of Life

Health-related quality of life was assessed using the short-form 36 health survey questionnaire (SF-36) [25]. This instrument assesses health-related quality of life during the previous 4 weeks on eight subscales (physical functioning, physical role functioning, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, emotional role functioning, and mental health) and 2 main component summaries (mental component summary, physical component summary). Each scale can range from 0 to 100, with higher values indicating better quality of life. Patients rated their general health status on an unscaled item as “excellent,” “very good,” “good,” “fair” or “poor.” The SF-36 is the most commonly used instrument to assess health-related quality of life in patients with chronic diseases and has proven excellent validity and reliability [25].

2.2.3. Mental Health

Mental health was assessed using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). This instrument has 14 items, scored on 4-point Likert scales [26]. Higher scores indicate more severe symptoms. For both dimensions, cut-off scores have been established that indicate possible subsyndromal (≥8) or clinically relevant (≥11) anxiety or depression [27]. The HADS has been specifically developed as an instrument to detect anxiety and depression in patients with physical conditions. Reliance on aspects of mental conditions that are also symptoms of physical diseases, for example, fatigue or sleep disorders, was avoided [26]. The instrument has excellent validity and reliability [27].

2.2.4. Life Satisfaction and Health Satisfaction

Life satisfaction and health satisfaction were assessed using a 5-point Likert scale item, each from the questionnaire for life satisfaction (FLZ) [28]. Life satisfaction was queried as follows “Considering your current situation, how satisfied are you with your overall life? and satisfaction with health as all in all, how satisfied are you with your health?” The endpoints ranged from 1 = very unsatisfied and 5 = very satisfied.

2.3. Statistical Analysis

Sociodemographic and clinical data were analyzed descriptively. Success of matching was tested by comparing sociodemographic and clinical data between groups. For this purpose and to identify differences between groups in health-related quality of life, mental health, and satisfaction, tests for matched pairs were used. Paired -tests were used for interval-scaled data, McNemar’s test for nominal data, and the sign test for ordinal data [29]. A value of ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant for all analyses. Analyses were conducted using SPSS (release 20.0, IBM, Armonk, NY, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Patients’ Characteristics

During the study period, 2804 patients were admitted to the hospital. Of those, 2486 (88.7%) agreed to participate in the study. One hundred and eighty-six patients reported to engage in regular yoga practice and were matched to 186 control subjects. Of patients who regularly practiced yoga, 129 reported health benefits and 3 reported negative effects associated with yoga practice.

Patients’ characteristics are shown in Table 1. The study sample mainly consisted of women in their 50s; about a third of the patients had been educated to A-level standard; and about half of the patients were in a relationship and employed. More than two-thirds of the patients experienced a chronic pain condition, with back pain, headache, fibromyalgia, and rheumatic arthritis being the most frequently causes for admission. The case and the control groups did not differ significantly on any of these variables.

Table 1: Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of patients with chronic diseases who practice yoga and those who do not (mean ± standard deviation).

Yoga ()
No yoga ()

Age
51.8 ± 12.8
51.5 ± 12.9
0.151

Gender (%)

1.000

    Female
165 (88.7%)
165 (88.7%)

    Male
21 (11.3%)
21 (11.3%)

Education (%) with A-level and higher
66 (35.5%)
66 (35.5%)
1.000

Family status (%) in relationship/married
105 (56.5%)
110 (59.1%)
0.630

Employment (%)

0.823

    Unemployed
103 (55.4%)
100 (53.8%)

    Part-time employed
33 (17.7%)
33 (17.7%)

    Full-time employed
50 (26.9%)
53 (28.5%)

Diagnosis (%)

1.000

    Spinal pain
34 (18.3%)
34 (18.3%)

    Osteoarthritis
16 (8.3%)
16 (8.3%)

    Rheumatic arthritis
9 (4.8%)
9 (4.8%)

    Fibromyalgia
27 (15.55)
27 (15.55)

    Headache
20 (10.8%)
20 (10.8%)

    Pain, others
18 (9.7%)
18 (9.7%)

    Hypertension
7 (3.8%)
7 (3.8%)

    Ischemic cardiac disease
2 (1.1%)
2 (1.1%)

    Inflamm. bowel disease
14 (7.5%)
14 (7.5%)

    Irritable bowel syndrome
9 (4.8%)
9 (4.8%)

    Lung diseases
8 (4.3%)
8 (4.3%)

    Others
22 (1.8%)
22 (1.8%)

3.2. Health-Related Quality of Life, Mental Health, Life Satisfaction, and Health Satisfaction

Patients who regularly practiced yoga reported a better general health status with more patients describing their health status as “excellent,” “good,” or “fair,” and less patients describing it as “poor” compared to those who did not regularly practice yoga (Table 2). Yoga practicing patients also reported a higher physical component summary for health-related quality of life (Table 3). Scores on all SF-36 subscales were higher in cases than in controls with only the physical functioning subscale showing significant group differences () (Figure 1). No significant group differences were found for anxiety, depression, life satisfaction, or health satisfaction (Table 3).

Table 2: General health status of patients with chronic diseases who practice yoga and those who do not.

Yoga ()
No yoga ()

General health status (%)

0.012

    Excellent
1 (0.5%)
0 (0.0%)

    Very good
2 (1.1%)
2 (1.1%)

    Good
32 (17.2%)
26 (14.0%)

    Fair
116 (62.4%)
101 (54.3%)

    Poor
35 (18.8%)
57 (30.6%)

Table 3: Health-related quality of life, mental health, and satisfaction in patients with chronic diseases who practice yoga and those who do not (Mean ± SD).

Yoga
No yoga
Group difference (95% CI)

Health-related quality of life (SF-36)

    Physical component score
35.7 ± 9.1
33.7 ± 9.9
2.0 (0.2; 3.7)
0.029

    Mental component score
37.3 ± 11.6
36.9 ± 11.5
0.5 (−2.2; 3.2)
0.737

Anxiety
9.9 ± 4.0
9.6 ± 3.9
0.3 (−0.6; 1.1)
0.518

Depression
7.5 ± 3.5
7.7 ± 4.0
−0.2 (−1.0; 0.5)
0.563

Life satisfaction
3.4 ± 0.9
3.3 ± 1.0
0.1 (−0.1; 0.3)
0.252

Health satisfaction
2.2 ± 1.0
2.1 ± 1.0
0.1 (−0.1; 0.3)
0.165

Figure 1: Health-related quality of life (SF-36 subscales) in patients with chronic diseases who regularly practice yoga and those who do not (mean + standard deviation). Asterisks indicate significant group differences.

4. Discussion

Using a case-control design, this study compared 186 patients with chronic diseases who regularly practiced yoga with 186 matched controls who did not. As hypothesized, yoga practitioners had better general health status and physical quality of life. In contrast, mental quality of life, mental health, life satisfaction, and health satisfaction did not differ significantly between groups. However, even while not reaching statistical significance, yoga practitioners scored higher on all dimensions of quality of life in the SF-36 including mental quality of life.

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case-control study investigating subjective health benefits associated with yoga practice under naturalistic conditions. Prior case-control studies have mainly investigated differences between healthy people or samples drawn from the general population on anatomical or physiological parameters. In a small case-control study, Chaya et al. [30] found increased insulin sensitivity in yoga practitioners compared to nonusers. Two Chinese studies compared magnetic resonance images in healthy yoga practitioners and non-practitioners and found increased risk of meniscus injuries [31] but decreased risk of degenerative disc disease in yoga practitioners [32]. A recent case-control study investigated brain-grounded maps of the body using a motor imagery task and found no differences between yoga practitioners and matched controls [33]. However, an uncontrolled cross-sectional study found linear associations between frequency of yoga practice under naturalistic conditions and subjective measures of health [34]. None of these studies involved patients with chronic diseases.

Effects of yoga on patients with chronic diseases have been investigated in a number of randomized-controlled trials. A recent meta-analysis found strong evidence for short-term effectiveness and moderate evidence for long-term effectiveness of yoga for chronic low back pain in the most important patient-centered outcomes [12]. Similarly, evidence of effectiveness has been reported by meta-analyses on yoga for fibromyalgia [14], other pain [35], and fatigue [36]. Yoga has also been reported to be effective in improving health status and quality of life in patients with arthritis [15], cardiovascular conditions [19, 37], and lung diseases [37]. In contrast to the findings of the present studies, yoga has also been shown to improve mental health in patients with psychological disorders [37–40] and physical conditions [14, 17, 18, 35]. Patients in both groups of this study reported high levels of depression and anxiety that reached borderline levels of generalized anxiety disorder [27]. The lack of significant group differences in measures of mental health suggests that the positive short-term effects that were found in clinical trials [14, 17, 18, 35, 37–41] might not be there under naturalistic conditions and/or not persist with sustained yoga practice.

How might yoga improve health status in patients with chronic diseases? Regarding chronic pain, the isometric exercises practiced during yoga have been shown to relieve pain and muscle spasm [13]. Moreover, yoga puts a focus on increasing awareness of muscle tonus and joint position and is also thought to help recognizing and changing habitual patterns of posture and muscle tension in daily life [6, 13]. Yoga has been shown to reduce stress [42], body weight, blood pressure, and hyperlipidemia [19, 43], conditions that are associated with chronic diseases such as coronary heart disease and diabetes [44]. Practice of yoga posture but not of yogic meditation has been shown to improve lung function and cardiovascular capacity. Thereby, yoga can improve overall fitness and exercise performance [37].

Three patients (1.6%) reported negative effects associated with their yoga practice. While positive effects of yoga are extensively researched, data on incidence rates of negative effects and adverse events are rare. A Finnish survey found that 62% of 110 Ashtanga Vinyasa Yoga practitioners reported at least 1 yoga-related musculoskeletal injury [45]. More recently, in a large national survey, 21.3% of about 2500 Australian yoga practitioners indicated that they had been injured during yoga in the past [46]. Therefore, the incidence rate of 1.3% in this analysis might underestimate the actual risks of yoga practice.

What is the specifically new this study adds? This study shows for the first time that practicing yoga under naturalistic conditions is associated with better general health status and physical quality of life in patients with chronic diseases. Moreover, yoga practice seems to be generally safe for this patient population. Yoga practice might, therefore, be recommended to patients with a variety of chronic diseases to improve their overall health and physical wellbeing.

The study reported here has several limitations. First, while cases and controls were matched on the most important sociodemographic and clinical variables, they might, however, still differ on some undetected parameters that enhance both yoga practice and health status. In this case, the association between yoga practice and health status might be a mere statistical artifact. Second, frequency of yoga practice, length of practice, and the specific yoga school where patients were engaged in were not assessed. Third, the study design did not control for total exercise time of cases and controls. Therefore, the differences between patients who regularly practiced yoga and those who did not reported here cannot be regarded as a necessarily specific effect of yoga practice but can also be attributed to the physical activity associated with yoga. The contribution of different components of yoga such as physical postures, breathing techniques, or meditation to its health-promoting effect is still an object of investigation.

Future research should address these limitations. Specifically, studies should investigate differences between different yoga schools and yoga practices, such as physical postures, breathing techniques, and meditation. Each of these practices has been shown to be associated with effects on specific health variables in an uncontrolled cross-sectional study [34]. To define the optimal dose of yoga practice, subgroups of yoga practitioners with different practice intensity should be compared. The role of physical activity in the health benefits of yoga could be investigated by controlling for total exercise time. Finally, the analysis presented here is limited to patients with internal diseases. Future studies could replicate this analysis in other patient groups such as patients with mental diseases.

In conclusion, patients with chronic diseases who regularly practiced yoga reported better overall health status and physical quality of life than those who did not. Practicing yoga under naturalistic conditions seems to be associated with improved physical health in chronically diseased patients.

Conflict of Interests

All authors declare that there was no conflict of interests. This study was supported by a Research Grant from the Karl and Veronica Carstens Foundation, Essen, Germany. There was no influence of the sponsor on the design or conduct of the study; the collection, management, analysis, or interpretation of the data; or in the preparation, review, or approval of the paper.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank all physicians, nurses, staff members, and patients for their help in data collection.

References

B. K. S. Iyengar, Light on Yoga, Schocken Books, New York, NY, USA, 1966.

G. Feuerstein, The Yoga Tradition, Hohm Press, Prescott, Ariz, USA, 1998.

E. De Michaelis, A History of Modern Yoga: Patanjali and Western Esotericism, Continuum International Publishing Group, London, UK, 2005.

Y. Hari, Hatha Yoga Pradipika, Nada Productions, Miramar, Fla, USA, 2006.

A. Büssing, F. Edelhuser, A. Weisskircher, J. M. Fouladbakhsh, and P. Heusser, “Inner correspondence and peacefulness with practices among participants in eurythmy therapy and yoga: a validation study,” Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 2011, Article ID 329023, 9 pages, 2011.

H. Cramer, R. Lauche, H. Haller, J. Langhorst, G. Dobos, and B. Berger, “‘I'm more in balance’. A qualitative study of yoga for patients with chronic neck pain,” Journal of Alternative and Complemententary Medicine, 2013.

D. Macy, “‘Yoga in America’ market study,” Yoga Journal magazine, 2008, http://www.yogajournal.com/advertise/press_releases/10

P. M. Barnes, E. Powell-Griner, K. McFann, and R. L. Nahin, “Complementary and alternative medicine use among adults: United States, 2002,” Advance Data, no. 343, pp. 1–19, 2004.

P. M. Barnes, B. Bloom, and R. L. Nahin, “Complementary and alternative medicine use among adults and children: United States, 2007,” National Health Statistics Reports, no. 12, pp. 1–23, 2009.

A. Dangerfield, “Yoga wars,” BBC news magazine, 2009, http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/7844691.stm

NHS, “Your health, your choices. A guide to yoga,” 2013, http://www.nhs.uk/Livewell/fitness/Pages/yoga.aspx

H. Cramer, R. Lauche, H. Haller, and G. Dobos, “A systematic review and meta-analysis of yoga for low back pain,” Clinical Journal of Pain, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 450–460, 2013.

H. Cramer, R. Lauche, C. Hohmann et al., “Randomized controlled trial comparing yoga and home-based exercise for chronic neck pain,” Clinical Journal of Pain, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 216–223.

J. Langhorst, P. Klose, G. J. Dobos, K. Bernardy, and W. Häuser, “Efficacy and safety of meditative movement therapies in fibromyalgia syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials,” Rheumatology International, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 193–207, 2013.

S. Haaz and S. J. Bartlett, “Yoga for arthritis: a scoping review,” Rheumatic Disease Clinics of North America, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 33–46, 2011.

K. B. Smith and C. F. Pukall, “An evidence-based review of yoga as a complementary intervention for patients with cancer,” Psycho-Oncology, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 465–475, 2009.

H. Cramer, S. Lange, P. Klose, A. Paul, and G. Dobos, “Yoga for breast cancer patients and survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” BMC Cancer, vol. 12, article 412, 2012.

H. Cramer, R. Lauche, J. Langhorst, and G. Dobos, “Effectiveness of yoga for menopausal symptoms—a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials,” Evidance-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 2012, Article ID 863905, 11 pages, 2012.

K. E. Innes, C. Bourguignon, and A. G. Taylor, “Risk indices associated with the insulin resistance syndrome, cardiovascular disease, and possible protection with yoga: a systematic review,” Journal of the American Board of Family Practice, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 491–519, 2005.

K. E. Innes and H. K. Vincent, “The influence of yoga-based programs on risk profiles in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review,” Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 469–486, 2007.

H. Cramer, R. Lauche, C. Hohmann, J. Langhorst, and G. Dobos, “Yoga for chronic neck pain: a twelve-month follow-up,” Pain Medicine, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 541–548, 2013.

D. R. Aberle, A. M. Adams, C. D. Berg et al., “Baseline characteristics of participants in the randomized national lung screening trial,” Journal of the National Cancer Institute, vol. 102, no. 23, pp. 1771–1779, 2010.

R. Lauche, H. Cramer, S. Moebus et al., “Results of a 2-week inpatient stay at a clinic for internal and integrative medicine—n observational study,” Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 2012, Article ID 875874, 10 pages, 2012.

World Health Organization, International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems 10th Revision, 2013, http://apps.who.int/classifications/icd10/browse/2010/en.

M. Bullinger and I. Kirchberger, SF-36 Fragebogen zum Gesundheitszustand, Hogrefe, Göttingen, Germany, 1998.

C. Herrmann, U. Buss, and R. P. Snaith, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale—Deutsche Version (HADS-D). Manual, Hans Huber, Bern, Switzerland, 1995.

C. Herrmann, “International experiences with the hospital anxiety and depression scale—a review of validation data and clinical results,” Journal of Psychosomatic Research, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 17–41, 1997.

J. Fahrenberg, M. Myrtek, J. Schumacher, and E. Brähler, Fragebogen zur Lebenszufriedenheit (FLZ). Handanweisung, Hogrefe, Göttingen, Germany, 2000.

J. M. Bland and D. G. Altman, “Matching,” The British Medical Journal, vol. 309, no. 6962, p. 1128, 1994.

M. S. Chaya, G. Ramakrishnan, S. Shastry et al., “Insulin sensitivity and cardiac autonomic function in young male practitioners of yoga,” National Medical Journal of India, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 217–221, 2008.

J. K. Zhu, L. D. Wu, R. Z. Zheng, and S. H. Lan, “Yoga is found hazardous to the meniscus for Chinese women,” Chinese Journal of Traumatoogy, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 148–151, 2012.

C. M. Jeng, T. C. Cheng, C. H. Kung, and H. C. Hsu, “Yoga and disc degenerative disease in cervical and lumbar spine: an MR imaging-based case control study,” European Spine Journal, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 408–413, 2011.

S. B. Wallwork, D. S. Butler, D. J. Wilson, and G. L. Moseley, “Are people who do yoga any better at a motor imagery task than those who do not?” The British Journal of Sports Medicine, 2013.

A. Ross, E. Friedmann, M. Bevans, and S. Thomas, “Frequency of yoga practice predicts health: results of a national survey of yoga practitioners,” Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 2012, Article ID 983258, 10 pages, 2012.

A. Büssing, T. Ostermann, R. Lüdtke, and A. Michalsen, “Effects of yoga interventions on pain and pain-associated disability: a meta-analysis,” Journal of Pain, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2012.

K. Boehm, T. Ostermann, S. Milazzo, and A. Büssing, “Effects of yoga interventions on fatigue: a meta-analysis,” Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 2012, Article ID 124703, 9 pages, 2012.

J. A. Raub, “Psychophysiologic effects of Hatha Yoga on musculoskeletal and cardiopulmonary function: a literature review,” Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 797–812, 2002.

A. W. Li and C. A. Goldsmith, “The effects of yoga on anxiety and stress,” Alternative Medicine Review, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 21–35, 2012.

K. Pilkington, G. Kirkwood, H. Rampes, and J. Richardson, “Yoga for depression: the research evidence,” Journal of Affective Disorders, vol. 89, no. 1–3, pp. 13–24, 2005.

H. B. Meyer, A. Katsman, A. C. Sones, D. E. Auerbach, D. Ames, and R. T. Rubin, “Yoga as an ancillary treatment for neurological and psychiatric disorders: a review,” Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 152–164, 2012.

L. A. Uebelacker, G. Epstein-Lubow, B. A. Gaudiano, G. Tremont, C. L. Battle, and I. W. Miller, “Hatha yoga for depression: critical review of the evidence for efficacy, plausible mechanisms of action, and directions for future research,” Journal of Psychiatric Practice, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 22–33, 2010.

C. S. M. Chong, M. Tsunaka, H. W. H. Tsang, E. P. Chan, and W. M. Cheung, “Effects of yoga on stress management in healthy adults: a systematic review,” Alternative therapies in health and medicine, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 32–38, 2011.

K. Yang, “A review of yoga programs for four leading risk factors of chronic diseases,” Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 487–491, 2007.

A. Jemal, E. Ward, Y. Hao, and M. Thun, “Trends in the leading causes of death in the United States, 1970–2002,” The Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 294, no. 10, pp. 1255–1259, 2005.

P. P. Mikkonen, P. Pedersen, and P. W. McCarthy, “A survey of musculoskeletal injury among Ashtanga Vinyasa yoga practitioners,” International Journal of Yoga Therapy, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 59–64, 2008.

S. Penman, M. Cohen, P. Stevens, and S. Jackson, “Yoga in Australia: results of a national survey,” International Journal of Yoga, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 92–101, 2012.