Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine
Volume 2021 (2021), Article ID 8896896, 10 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8896896

Review Article

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Good Self-Care Practice among People Living with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Ethiopia: A National Call to Bolster Lifestyle Changes

Baye Dagnew,¹ Getu Debalkie Demissie,² and Dessie Abebaw Angaw³

¹Department of Human Physiology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, P. O. Box 196, Gondar, Ethiopia
²Department of Health Promotion and Behavioral Sciences, Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, P. O. Box 196, Gondar, Ethiopia
³Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, P. O. Box 196, Gondar, Ethiopia

Correspondence should be addressed to Baye Dagnew; bayedagnew7@gmail.com

Received 14 September 2020; Revised 1 January 2021; Accepted 12 February 2021; Published 22 February 2021

Academic Editor: Hongcai Shang

Copyright © 2021 Baye Dagnew et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

Background. Self-care practice is the mainstay of management for good glycemic control. Despite the presence of a few pocket studies, no comprehensive study was conducted in Ethiopia to demonstrate the overall good self-care practice among diabetic patients in Ethiopia. Therefore, we intended to conduct this systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate the overall good self-care practice among people living with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in Ethiopia. Methods. We systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, Science Direct, Cochrane library, Google scholar, and direct Google to retrieve relevant studies. Forest plot was used to present the pooled estimate of good self-care practice using DerSimonian and Laird’s random-effects model. We checked publication bias using Egger’s test and funnel plot. Potential heterogeneity was tested using the I-squared statistic. Moreover, subgroup and sensitivity analyses were performed. Results. In this review, 12 primary studies (with a total sample size of 4030) were included. Because of the presence of heterogeneity, we employed a random-effects model. After running the random-effects model, the pooled estimate of overall good self-care practice was 51.12% (95% CI: 41.90–60.34). Furthermore, the pooled estimate of good dietary practice was 50.18% (95% CI: 32.75–67.60), good physical exercise practice was 48.29% (95% CI: 34.14–62.43), the good footcare practice was 63.61% (95% CI: 45.56–81.66), and appropriate self-monitoring of the blood glucose level was 31.89% (95% CI: −4.62–68.41). In this meta-analysis, there was serious interstudy variation, but there was no publication bias. Conclusions. The overall good self-care practice among people living with T2DM was low which necessitates the need for designing strategies to increase the self-care practice. The health sector has to bolster awareness creation to allow better plasma glucose control and preventing diabetes-related complications. This trial is registered with CRD42019147694.

1. Background

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a silently progressive, but serious health condition which affects 386.7 million (prevalence of 8.3%) people globally and projected to rise to 592 million by 2035 [1]. In developed countries, the prevalence of diabetes mellitus is closer to 16% [2]. As reported in 2012, above 77% of diabetes-related morbidity and 88% of mortality occurred in low- and middle-income countries [2, 3]. This is profoundly increased in developing countries, which is attributed to the economic growth, increased life expectancy, and lifestyle changes associated with increasing trends towards urbanization, including unhealthy diet, obesity, and a sedentary lifestyle, resulting in late-onset DM [4]. In Ethiopia, the prevalence of DM was 3.5% in 2011 [5]. The extrapolated prevalence in 2013 was 4.36%, and 34,262 DM patients died in Ethiopia in 2013 [1] with the projected number of DM cases to upsurge to 1.8 million in 2030 [6].

Diabetes-related complications are the major causes of morbidity and mortality [5] and reduce the patients’ quality of life and productivity [7]. Almost no organ is free of diabetes-related complications, but mainly, the eyes (retinopathy, blindness), kidneys (nephropathy), and nerves (neuropathy), blood vessels, musculoskeletal system (poor wound healing), and oral cavity (periodontal diseases) are affected [8].

These vast bad outcomes of DM can only be averted by the cooperative actions of patient activities and health workers intervention [9]. Among the patients’ side, a self-care practice is the mainstay of management for the prevention of diabetes-associated complications and improves health outcomes of patients. Individual components of self-care practice include healthy eating, blood glucose monitoring, physical exercise, foot-care, and healthy coping [10]. Good self-care practice in DM is associated with improved glycemic control [11–13]. Physical exercise for at least 30 minutes a day can reduce diabetes-associated cardiovascular risks by 50% [14].

Even though pieces of evidence showed that good self-care practice is essential to improve the clinical outcomes of DM [15], there is no comprehensive study in Ethiopia to determine self-care practice at the national level. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the pooled estimate of overall good self-care practice among people living with T2DM in Ethiopia.

2. Methods

2.1. Reporting and Registration of the Protocol

The reporting approach was using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guideline [16]. We registered the protocol at PROSPERO with protocol number CRD42019147694 and is available at https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO.

2.2. Inclusion Criteria

(i)Setting: studies conducted in Ethiopia and its localities(ii)Population: adult people living with T2DM(iii)Study type: studies that applied cross-sectional design that reported proportion or prevalence of good self-care practice(iv)Outcome: good self-care practice among adult people living with T2DM(v)Publication status: all published studies(vi)Publication year: no restriction of publication year(vii)Publication date: we included studies published until 5 May 2019(viii)Language: all studies published in English only(ix)Exclusion criteria: citations without abstract, case-reports, case series, unidentified reports, editorials, and those qualitative studies, studies that reported sex-specific findings, either male-only or female-only, were excluded.

2.3. Data Sources

We systematically searched electronic databases including PubMed, Scopus, Science Direct, Cochrane library, and also Google Scholar, and direct Google search to find out primary studies that are relevant to the systematic review and meta-analysis of good self-care practice among people living with T2DM.

2.4. Searching Strategies

In our searching strategy, we included a combination of words or phrases interrelated to self-care practice among adults living with T2DM. The basic search terms and phrases were “self-care,” “self-adherence,” “behavior,” “practice,” “adherence,” “dietary behavior,” “self-management,” “self-control,” “diabetes,” “type 2 diabetes mellitus,” “diabetes mellitus,” and “hyperglycemia.” Corresponding authors were contacted to get full-texts for those studies with incomplete data. We also retrieved additional relevant studies by searching the reference lists of included studies to account for missed studies during electronic database searching. To fit advanced search for different electronic databases, we used a combination of MeSH (Medical Subject Heading) terms or phrases using Boolean operators, “AND” and “OR.” For PubMed database searching, we used the following search strategy: (self-care [Title/Abstract]) OR practice [Title/Abstract]) OR behavior [Title/Abstract]) OR adherence [Title/Abstract]) AND “type 2 Diabetes mellitus ”[Title/Abstract]. For SCOPUS database searching we applied a combination of [TITLE-ABS-KEY] (self-care) AND [TITLE-ABS KEY] (behavior OR practice OR adherence) AND [TITLE-ABS-KEY] (type 2 diabetes AND Mellitus OR diabetes OR insulin AND independent AND diabetes).

2.5. Selection of Studies

We exported all the retrieved primary studies into Endnote version 7 reference manager to remove duplicate studies and also to manage in-text citation and bibliography. Two independent reviewers (BD and GDD) performed screening of the included studies using specific selection criteria. Most of the discrepancies were resolved by the two (BD and GDD) reviewers by consensus after thorough discussion. Few disagreements between the two reviewers were harmonized by the third reviewer (DAA) based on conventional article selection criteria.

2.6. Risk of Bias Assessment

All the selected studies for inclusion were appraised independently by the two authors (BD and GDD) using the quality assessment tool adapted from Hoy et al. [17] that can address both the external and internal validities. The tool has 9 risks of bias items with a maximum score of nine and minimum score zero. The overall risk of study bias has 3 parts such as low risk (0–3) [2], moderate risk [4–6], and high risk [7–9].

2.7. Data Abstraction

Two authors (BD and GDD) extracted the data independently using a structured data extraction format prepared by Microsoft 2010 Excel spreadsheet. After independent extraction, repetition was performed for any variations in the extraction process. Most discrepancies were fixed by the two authors (BD and GDD), and few discrepancies were resolved by the third reviewer (DAA). We communicated with corresponding authors of eligible studies through e-mail and/or cellphone to access incomplete data. The following data were extracted for each included studies: the name of the corresponding author, publication year, study design, study locality, sample size, study type, overall good self-care practice, and individual good self-care practices.

2.8. Outcome Measurement

The primary outcome was good self-care practice among people living with T2DM. Besides, good dietary practice, good footcare practice, self-monitoring of blood glucose, and appropriate physical exercise were the outcome variables for this review. Self-care practice is measured using the Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities (SDSCA) which contains four domains such as dietary, footcare, exercise, and self-monitoring of blood glucose in the last 7 days. Response choices range from 0 to 7. The overall mean score was calculated by summation of each item of the scales and divided by the number of items. Therefore, participants who scored equal to or greater than a mean score were classified as having good diabetes self-care practice. Self-care practice is self-management undertaken by the patients’ willingness and consisted of four domains such as dietary, footcare, exercise, and self-monitoring of blood glucose [18, 19].

Good dietary practice: using the modified form of the fourteen item scales, patients who scored above the median value for the response were classified as having good dietary practice [20].

Good physical exercise practice: 20–30 min of aerobic exercise such as walking or swimming 3-4 days per week [19].

Good footcare practice: patients who scored a total practice score of ≥50% of the maximum score are considered as having good footcare practice.

Appropriate self-monitoring of the blood glucose level: A diabetic patient who monitored his blood glucose level at least four times a day is considered as having good self-monitoring of the blood glucose level [21].

2.9. Reliability

A second reviewer (GDD) was blinded to primary reviewer’s (BD) decision for checking articles selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment phases of the review. Any dissimilarities of judgment were discussed; otherwise, a third reviewer (DAA) was available to arbitrate any issues that remained unresolved.

2.10. Statistical Analysis

The analysis was performed by the active participation of three authors (BD, GDD, and DAA). We performed Egger’s test and funnel plot to find out the possibility of publication bias. I-squared statistics were computed to check heterogeneity in which 25%, 50%, and 75% represent low, moderate, and high heterogeneity, respectively [22]. The pooled self-care practice was estimated using DerSimonian and Laird’s random-effects model [23]. Subgroup analysis was performed to resolve study variations. Sensitivity analysis was employed to identify possible outlying studies and the effects of a single study on the overall estimation. Stata version 11 was used for the analysis with installed meta-analysis packages. The measure of the outcome variable was point estimate with 95% interval estimate.

3. Results

3.1. Characteristics of Included Studies

After full searching of major electronic databases, we retrieved 437 studies, of which 12 studies [24–35] (with a total sample size of 4030 adults living with T2DM) were included for the qualitative synthesis and meta-analysis of good self-care practice (Figure 1).

Figure 1: A PRISMA flow diagram exemplifying the study selection process of included studies for systematic review and meta-analysis of good self-care practice among people living with T2DM.

Of the included studies, the sample size ranged from 194 [35] to 637 [33]. We planned to include all observational studies (case-control, cohort, and cross-sectional studies), but we found only cross-sectional studies which had the required outcome variable and all of them were published. The quality assessment was performed using Hoy et al. critical appraisal tool in each study with no considerable risk of bias for each study. All studies used adults aged 18 years and above except one study which used those participants with the age above 15 years. Regarding sex composition, only 11 studies described the sex compassion as male and females, but one study did not show the male to female ratio (Table 1).

Table 1: Characteristics and quality status of the included studies for this systematic review and meta-analysis.

Author
Year
Country
Study design
Sample size
Sex
Age (years)
Good dietary practice (%)
Good physical exercise
Good footcare practice (%)
Good self-monitoring of blood glucose level (%)
Overall good self-care practice (%)
Quality status

Kassahun T [32]
2016
Ethiopia
Cross-sectional
309
M = 189
≥18
51.1
—
—
—
51.1
Low risk

Chali SW [29]
2018
Ethiopia
Cross-sectional
383
M = 209
≥18
—
—
—
—
54.3
Low risk

Asmelash D [25]
2019
Ethiopia
Cross-sectional
403
M = 216
≥18
45.4
48.9
43.7
97.5
74.4
Low risk

Abate TW [24]
2018
Ethiopia
Cross-sectional
416
M = 240
≥18
—
—
—
—
28.4
Low risk

Mariye T [34]
2018
Ethiopia
Cross-sectional
284
NA
≥18
—
—
—
—
37.3
Low risk

Sorato MM [35]
2016
Ethiopia
Cross-sectional
194
M = 95
>15
82.4
50.5
—
5.7
41.2
Low risk

Kalayou KB [28]
2017
Ethiopia
Cross-sectional
300
M = 173
≥18
30.7
74.0
51.3
14.0
51
Low risk

Mamo M [33]
2016
Ethiopia
Cross-sectional
637
M = 290
≥18
15.4
25.7
76.3
29.0
60.3
Low risk

Ayele K [27]
2012
Ethiopia
Cross-sectional
222
M = 88
≥18
57.7
31.1
—
41.9
39.2
Low risk

Ayele BH [26]
2019
Ethiopia
Cross-sectional
320
M = 142
≥18
—
—
—
—
38.1
Low risk

Addisu Y [31]
2013
Ethiopia
Cross-sectional
310
M = 200
≥18
49.7
44.5
—
20.0
76.8
Low risk

Dedefo MG [30]
2019
Ethiopia
Cross-sectional
252
M = 138
≥18
69.4
63.5
82.9
15.1
60.7
Low risk

The total sample size of the 12 studies
4030
M = 1980

M, male; NA, not available (from the included studies, one study did not describe the number of males and females in the study).

The pooled estimate of good self-care practice among people living with T2DM.

In the meta-analysis of the magnitude of overall good self-care practice, there was substantial heterogeneity (I² = 97.4%). To account for this interstudy variation, we used a random-effects model for the main meta-analysis of estimated pooled prevalence of overall good self-care practice, and it was 51.12% (95% CI: 41.90–60.34) (Figure 2).

Figure 2: Estimated pooled prevalence of overall good self-care practice among T2DM.

3.2. Subgroup Analysis

We performed subgroup analysis by year of publication with still high heterogeneity. The estimated pooled prevalence of good self-care practice was highest in studies published before 2017 (53.88%), and it was 54.37% in those studies who used a sample size of above 384 (Table 2).

Table 2: Subgroup analysis of the pooled estimate of good self-care practice with 95% CI, value, and heterogeneity estimate among people living with T2DM.

Subgroup analysis by
Characteristics
Pooled estimate (%)
I² ( value)

Year of publication
Before 2017
53.88 (40.77–66.98)
96.8% ()

≥2017
49.17 (36.16–62.18)
97.8% ()

Sample size
≤384
50.03 (40.85–59.21)
95.9% ()

>384
54.37 (28.73–80.05)
99.1% ()

3.3. Publication Bias

It was assessed using funnel plot, and the result indicated the symmetrical distribution of studies (Figure 3) and Egger’s regression test () with bias coefficient = 0.018 indicating that there was no publication bias.

Figure 3: Funnel plot to show publication bias for the good self-care practice.

3.4. Sensitivity Analysis

To check the effect of a single study on the overall outcome, we used the leave-one-out method, and there was no observed study which exerted a significant impact on the overall estimate of good self-care practice (Figure 4).

Figure 4: Sensitivity analysis for studies included in the meta-analysis of overall good self-practice.

3.5. The Estimated Pooled Prevalence of Individual Good Self-Care Practice

The pooled estimate of good dietary practice was 50.18% (95% CI: 32.75–67.60) (Figure 5), good physical exercise practice was 48.29% (95% CI: 34.14–62.43) (Figure 6), good footcare practice was 63.61% (95% CI: 45.56–81.66) (Figure 7), and appropriate self-monitoring of the blood glucose level was 31.89% (95% CI: -4.62–68.41) (Figure 8).

Figure 5: Estimated pooled prevalence of good dietary practice among T2DM.

Figure 6: Forest plot depicting good physical exercise among T2DM.

Figure 7: Pooled estimate of good footcare practice among people living with T2DM.

Figure 8: Pooled estimate of appropriate self-monitoring of the blood glucose level among T2DM.

4. Discussion

Due to lack of shreds of evidence on the overall good self-care practice, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the estimated pooled prevalence of overall good self-care practice and its components (dietary practice, physical exercise, blood glucose monitoring, and footcare practices) among people living with T2DM. Self-care practice is a vital strategy for the management of diabetes mellitus using different domains (components) of self-care practice such as good dietary practice, physical exercise, footcare, and self-monitoring of blood glucose level [36]. Self-care practice is important for healthcare sector stakeholders to design and implement prevention strategies for DM-related complications [37]. The practice of self-care is not only important to diabetic patients but also for other medical practices to reduce the direct and indirect costs of medicine [38]. Plasma glucose control is important for prevention and decelerating the progression of complications which can be achieved by integrated management (pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic) [39].

In this meta-analysis, the pooled estimate of overall good self-care practice among people living with T2DM in Ethiopia was 51.12% (95% CI: 41.90–60.34). This is similar to a study conducted in Malaysia (51.12 vs. 53%) [40] but lower than a study in Bangladesh (51.12% vs. 71.8%) [41]. This difference might be due to the socioeconomic status of the population, extent (scope) of the study, and sample size variations. Furthermore, the status of health service delivery in the country could affect self-care practice. Healthcare providers and the community education level, media exposure level, and utilization of standard guidelines to practice self-care are also factors which might bring differences in the level of self-care practice among different countries. The pooled estimate of good physical exercise in this meta-analysis was lower than a study in Ghana (48.29% vs. 69.33%) [42] but higher than a study in Yemen (48.29% vs. 15.2%) [43] and Poland (48.29% vs. 26.5%) [44]. This difference might be because of sample size differences and wealth index of the countries. Besides the abovementioned reasons, the health system of the country and community education might affect the practice. Regarding good dietary practice, the pooled estimate was 50.18% which is consistent to a study in Ethiopian hospitals (50.18% vs. 44.3%) [45], Addis Ababa, Ethiopia (50.18% vs. 48.6%) [46], and Bahir Dar, Ethiopia (50.18% vs. 35.9%) [20] but higher than a study conducted in Yemen (50.18% vs. 21.0%) [43]. This difference might be justified by variations in the population of the study, duration of diabetes mellitus, and health information given by health educators or health service providers. The pooled estimate of good footcare was 63.61% which is higher than a study in Malaysia (63.61 vs. 38.2%) [47], Iraq (63.61% vs. 40%) [48], and Gujarat, India (63.61% vs. 16.6%) [49]. This could be due to the variations in the socioeconomic status, the extent of the study, and sample size differences. Moreover, the composition of healthcare providers could affect footcare practice. As it is known, the prevalence of T2DM and its complications are progressively rising. This study is implicated to the Ethiopian Federal Ministry of Health and local health officials to monitor and undertake supportive supervision to health professionals and service delivery to prevent long-term complications of T2DM.

4.1. Limitations of the Study

As a limitation, the results of this study should be interpreted by considering possible limitations. Due to lack of sufficient studies in Ethiopia, it might be difficult to generalize to the whole population. Interstudy heterogeneity was profound in this review which was not resolved using subgroup analysis, and we were not able to find out the remarkably influencing factors for the outcome.

5. Conclusions

This systematic review and meta-analysis revealed a lower pooled estimate of overall good self-care practice of which good footcare practice was the highest. Self-care practice is profoundly important for the control of plasma glucose concentration among people living with T2DM. The health sector stakeholders have to bolster awareness creation to enhance self-care practice of people living with T2DM to bring better plasma glucose control and preventing diabetes mellitus associated complications.

Abbreviations

CI: | Confidence interval
DM: | Diabetes mellitus
ES: | Effect size.

Data Availability

The dataset used to support the findings of this study is available from the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

BD prepared the PROSPERO registration, conceptualized the study, and involved in study selection, data extraction, report writing, manuscript first draft preparation, and review. GDD participated in the protocol writing, conceptualization, screening, data extraction, analysis, report writing, and manuscript preparation. DAA involved in the screening of primary studies, resolution of conflicts during data extraction, took part in the analysis section, and manuscript write-up. All authors read and approved the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the authors of primary studies.

References

L. Guariguata, D. R. Whiting, I. Hambleton, J. Beagley, U. Linnenkamp, and J. E. Shaw, “Global estimates of diabetes prevalence for 2013 and projections for 2035,” Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, vol. 103, no. 2, pp. 137–149, 2014.

S. Wild, G. Roglic, A. Green, R. Sicree, and H. King, “Global prevalence of diabetes: estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030,” Diabetes Care, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 1047–1053, 2004.

A. D. Harries, S. Satyanarayana, A. M. V. Kumar et al., “Epidemiology and interaction of diabetes mellitus and tuberculosis and challenges for care: a review [Review article],” Public Health Action, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 3–9, 2013.

J. da Rocha Fernandes, K. Ogurtsova, U. Linnenkamp et al., “IDF Diabetes Atlas estimates of 2014 global health expenditures on diabetes,” Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, vol. 117, pp. 48–54, 2016.

D. R. Whiting, L. Guariguata, C. Weil, and J. Shaw, “IDF diabetes atlas: global estimates of the prevalence of diabetes for 2011 and 2030,” Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, vol. 94, no. 3, pp. 311–321, 2011.

Y. Feleke and F. Enquselassie, “An assessment of the health care system for diabetes in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia,” Ethiopian Journal of Health Development, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 203–210, 2005.

K. V. Narayan, P. Zhang, A. M. Kanaya et al., Diabetes: The Pandemic and Potential Solutions. Disease Control Priorities in Developing Countries, The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank, Chennai, India, 2nd edition, 2006.

A. L. G. Figueira, L. C. G. V. Boas, A. C. M. Coelho, M. C. Fd Freitas, and A. E. Pace, “Educational interventions for knowledge on the disease, treatment adherence and control of diabetes mellitus,” Revista latino-americana de enfermagem., vol. 25, 2017.

I. D. Atlas, Online Version of IDF Diabetes Atlas, International Diabetes Federation, Brussels, Belgium, 2013.

A. A. Educators, “AADE guidelines for the practice of diabetes self-management education and training (DSME/T),” The Diabetes Educator, vol. 35, no. 3_suppl, pp. 85S–107S, 2009.

M. Song, “Diabetes mellitus and the importance of self-care,” Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 93–98, 2010.

C. Y. Osborn, S. S. Bains, and L. E. Egede, “Health literacy, diabetes self-care, and glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes,” Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics, vol. 12, no. 11, pp. 913–919, 2010.

J. K. T. Tshiananga, S. Kocher, C. Weber, K. Erny-Albrecht, K. Berndt, and K. Neeser, “The effect of nurse-led diabetes self-management education on glycosylated hemoglobin and cardiovascular risk factors,” The Diabetes Educator, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 108–123, 2012.

H. Hamasaki, “Daily physical activity and type 2 diabetes: a review,” World Journal of Diabetes, vol. 7, no. 12, p. 243, 2016.

J. J. Eva, N. C. Fen, L. C. Ming, W. Y. Yen, P. Sarker, and M. M. Rahman, “Self-care and self-management among adolescent T2DM patients: a focused review,” Frontiers in Endocrinology, vol. 9, p. 489, 2018.

V. Welch, M. Petticrew, P. Tugwell et al., “PRISMA-Equity 2012 extension: reporting guidelines for systematic reviews with a focus on health equity,” PLoS Medicine, vol. 9, no. 10, Article ID e1001333, 2012.

D. Hoy, P. Brooks, A. Woolf et al., “Assessing risk of bias in prevalence studies: modification of an existing tool and evidence of interrater agreement,” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol. 65, no. 9, pp. 934–939, 2012.

I. D. Federation, IDF Diabetes Atlas: International Diabetes Federation, Executive Office, Chennai, India, 2011.

E. Hailu, W. H. Mariam, T. Belachew, and Z. Birhanu, “Self-care practice and glycaemic control amongst adults with diabetes at the Jimma University Specialized Hospital in south-west Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study,” African Journal of Primary Health Care & Family Medicine, vol. 4, no. 1, 2012.

Y. M. Demilew, A. T. Alem, and A. A. Emiru, “Dietary practice and associated factors among type 2 diabetic patients in felege hiwot regional referral hospital, Bahir dar, Ethiopia,” BMC Research Notes, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 434, 2018.

E. M. Benjamin, “Self-monitoring of blood glucose: the basics,” Clinical Diabetes, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 45–47, 2002.

J. P. T. Higgins, S. G. Thompson, J. J. Deeks, and D. G. Altman, “Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses,” BMJ, vol. 327, no. 7414, pp. 557–560, 2003.

R. DerSimonian and N. Laird, “Meta-analysis in clinical trials,” Controlled Clinical Trials, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 177–188, 1986.

T. W. Abate, M. Tareke, and M. Tirfie, “Self-care practices and associated factors among diabetes patients attending the outpatient department in Bahir Dar, Northwest Ethiopia,” BMC Research Notes, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 800, 2018.

D. Asmelash, N. Abdu, S. Tefera, H. W. Baynes, and C. Derbew, “Knowledge, attitude, and practice towards glycemic control and its associated factors among diabetes mellitus patients,” Journal of Diabetes Research, vol. 2019, Article ID 2593684, 9 pages, 2019.

B. H. Ayele, M. M. Mengesha, and T. Tesfa, “Predictors of self-care activities of outpatient diabetic residents in Harar and Dire Dawa: a hospital-based cross-sectional study,” SAGE Open Medicine, vol. 7, 2019.

K. Ayele, B. Tesfa, L. Abebe, T. Tilahun, and E. Girma, “Self care behavior among patients with diabetes in Harari, Eastern Ethiopia: the health belief model perspective,” PLoS One, vol. 7, no. 4, Article ID e35515, 2012.

K. K. Berhe, H. B. Gebru, H. B. Kahsay, and A. A. Kahsay, “Assessment of self care management and its associated factors among type 2 diabetes patients in mekelle hospital and ayder referral hospitals, mekelle city, tigray, northern Ethiopia, 2012/13,” Global Journal of Medical Research, vol. 17, 2017.

S. W. Chali, M. H. Salih, and A. T. Abate, “Self-care practice and associated factors among diabetes mellitus patients on follow up in benishangul Gumuz regional state public hospitals, western Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study,” BMC Research Notes, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 833, 2018.

M. G. Dedefo, B. M. Ejeta, G. B. Wakjira, G. F. Mekonen, and B. G. Labata, “Self-care practices regarding diabetes among diabetic patients in West Ethiopia,” BMC Research Notes, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 212, 2019.

A. E. Yohannes Addisu Endalew Hailu, “Assessment of diabetic patient perception on diabetic disease and self-care practice in dilla university referral hospital, south Ethiopia,” Journal of Metabolic Syndrome, vol. 3, no. 4, 2013.

T. Kassahun, H. Gesesew, L. Mwanri, and T. Eshetie, “Diabetes related knowledge, self-care behaviours and adherence to medications among diabetic patients in Southwest Ethiopia: a cross-sectional survey,” BMC Endocrine Disorders, vol. 16, no. 1, 2016.

M. Mamo and M. Demissie, “Self care practice and its associated factors among diabetic patients in addisababa public hospitals, cross sectional study,” Journal of Diabetes and Cholesterol Metabolism, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 2–5, 2016.

T. Mariye, H. Tasew, G. Teklay, H. Gerensea, and W. Daba, “Magnitude of diabetes self-care practice and associated factors among type two adult diabetic patients following at public Hospitals in central zone, Tigray Region, Ethiopia, 2017,” BMC Research Notes, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 380, 2018.

M. M. Sorato, “Levels and predictors of adherence to self-care behaviour among adult type 2 diabetics at arba minch general hospital, Southern Ethiopia,” Journal of Diabetes & Metabolism, vol. 7, no. 6, 2016.

S. R. Shrivastava, P. S. Shrivastava, and J. Ramasamy, “Role of self-care in management of diabetes mellitus,” Journal of Diabetes & Metabolic Disorders, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 14, 2013.

A. Tol, D. Shojaeezadeh, A. Eslami et al., “Evaluation of self-care practices and relative components among type 2 diabetic patients,” Journal of Education and Health Promotion, vol. 1, 2012.

W. H. Organization, Self-care in the Context of Primary Health Care, WHO Regional Office for South-East Asia, New Delhi, India, 2009.

G. Roglic, “WHO Global report on diabetes: a summary,” International Journal of Noncommunicable Diseases, vol. 1, no. 1, p. 3, 2016.

M. Y. Tan and J. Magarey, “Self-care practices of Malaysian adults with diabetes and sub-optimal glycaemic control,” Patient Education and Counseling, vol. 72, no. 2, pp. 252–267, 2008.

F. Saleh, S. J. Mumu, F. Ara, M. A. Hafez, and L. Ali, “Non-adherence to self-care practices & medication and health related quality of life among patients with type 2 diabetes: a cross-sectional study,” BMC Public Health, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 431, 2014.

J. Osei-Yeboah, W. Owiredu, G. Norgbe et al., “Physical activity pattern and its association with glycaemic and blood pressure control among people living with diabetes (PLWD) in the Ho municipality, Ghana,” Ethiopian Journal of Health Sciences, vol. 29, no. 1, 2019.

A. ALhariri, F. Daud, and S. A. M. Saghir, “Factors associated with adherence to diet and exercise among type 2 diabetes patients in Yemen,” Diabetes Management, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 264–271, 2017.

http://Physical-Activity-In-diabetes-patients-at-the-level-of-primary-medical-healthcare-a-polish-national-study-2572-5629-1000136.pdf.

M. A. Mohammed and N. T. Sharew, “Adherence to dietary recommendation and associated factors among diabetic patients in Ethiopian teaching hospitals,” Pan African Medical Journal, vol. 33, no. 260, 2019.

A. Worku, S. M. Abebe, and M. M. Wassie, “Dietary practice and associated factors among type 2 diabetic patients: a cross sectional hospital based study, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia,” SpringerPlus, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 15, 2015.

A. Muhammad-Lutfi, M. Zaraihah, and I. Anuar-Ramdhan, “Knowledge and practice of diabetic foot care in an in- patient Setting at a tertiary medical center,” Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal, vol. 8, no. 3, p. 22, 2014.

H. J. Saber and A. S. Daoud, “Knowledge and practice about the foot care and the prevalence of the neuropathy among a sample of type 2 diabetic patients in Erbil, Iraq,” Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care, vol. 7, no. 5, p. 967, 2018.

N. Lakshmi, N. Patel, P. Parmar, K. Garasiya, and M. Chaudhary, “Study the foot care practice among diabetic patients in Ahmedabad city, Gujarat,” International Journal of Medical Science and Public Health, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 333–338, 2018.