International Journal of Endocrinology
Volume 2019 (2019), Article ID 7874890, 6 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/7874890

Research Article

Ultrasound Microvascular Blood Flow Evaluation: A New Tool for the Management of Thyroid Nodule?

Carlo Cappelli,¹ Ilenia Pirola,¹ Elena Gandossi,¹ Fiorella Marini,¹ Alessandra Cristiano,¹ Claudio Casella,² Davide Lombardi,³ Barbara Agosti,¹ Alberto Ferlin,¹ and Maurizio Castellano¹

¹Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, SSD Medicina ad indirizzo Endocrino-metabolico, University of Brescia, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, 25123 Brescia, Italy
²Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, 3rd Division of General Surgery, University of Brescia, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, 25123 Brescia, Italy
³Department of Otorhinolaryngology, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, 25123 Brescia, Italy

Correspondence should be addressed to Carlo Cappelli; carlo.cappelli@unibs.it

Received 23 August 2018; Revised 25 January 2019; Accepted 6 February 2019; Published 25 March 2019

Academic Editor: Thomas J. Fahey

Copyright © 2019 Carlo Cappelli et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

Background. Toshiba Medical System has developed a new Doppler technique [Superb Microvascular Imaging (SMI)] that has improved microvascular flow imaging. SMI depicts perinodular and intranodular thyroid microvascular flow in higher detail compared to standard colour Doppler (CD) and power Doppler (PD) imaging. Objective. Assess the nodular microvascular architecture by SMI compared to CD and PD features in a series of thyroid nodules submitted to fine needle aspiration cytology, in order to evaluate the potential of SMI in detecting thyroid cancer. Materials and Methods. From April 2016 to July 2017, 254 patients with thyroid nodules, evaluated as at high risk for malignancy in agreement with AACE/ACE/AME guidelines, were submitted to cytology. All nodules were previously submitted to ultrasound grayscale, CD, PD, and SMI evaluation. Benign and malignant nodules were stratified in accordance to the number of vessels visualised by SMI: score 1 with a maximum of two blood vessels and score 2 with three or more vessels. Results. Score 1 was found in 59.6% of benign nodules and in 17.9% of malignant nodules, whereas score 2 was found in 40.4% and in 82.1%, respectively (sensitivity 81.7%; specificity 60.5%, ). Variables significantly associated with malignancy in the univariate analysis were gender (OR, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.08-0.37; ), vascularity (OR, 1.91; 95% CI, 1.65-3.89; ), and SMI (OR, 6.72; 95% CI, 3.89-11.59; ); multivariate logistic model confirmed SMI score 2 as an independent risk factor for malignancy (OR, 6.99; 95% CI, 3.46-12.09; ). Conclusions. This prospective pilot study showed that SMI can depict intranodular flow in higher detail compared to CDI and PDI, thus improving thyroid cancer detection.

1. Introduction

Thyroid nodularity is extremely common in clinical practice. In a large population study, clinically apparent thyroid nodules were present in 6.4 percent of women and 1.5 percent of men [1]. In surveys of unselected subjects using ultrasonography, 20 to 76 percent of women had at least one thyroid nodule [2, 3]. In Italy, an area of relative iodine deficiency, the ultrasound screening finds thyroid nodules in approximately 50% of all adults [4], and the figure climbs as high as 68% in certain regions [5]. Despite the number of thyroid nodules being impressive, the prevalence of thyroid cancer is low, amounting to about 7%-15% of cases depending on age, sex, radiation exposure history, family history, and other factors [6]. Fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is considered the most reliable test for the diagnosis of thyroid nodules, but it is not cost-effective to submit all the lesions to FNAC; therefore, ultrasound (US) evaluation has become crucial to determine when a nodule requires FNAC or sonographic follow-up. For this reason, several societal guidelines have been written to aid practitioners in making appropriate recommendations, which have also identified certain US features that suggest a higher likelihood of malignancy of a thyroid nodule [7–11]. The hypoechogenicity of the nodule, irregular margins, presence of microcalcifications, absence of halo, and a “taller than wide” shape are considered the features that are more suggestive of cancer. However, none of these are sufficiently specific to classify a lesion as malignant [12, 13].

The use of colour Doppler (CD) and power Doppler (PD) imaging for characterisation of thyroid nodule vascularity is widely used currently. It is considered a nonspecific feature for malignancy even if the presence of intranodular flow raises more concerns than if there is no flow or just perinodular flow is seen. Indeed, different studies showed conflicting data about intranodular vascularity as a sonographic risk factor for thyroid cancer. Perhaps, it depends on the fact that there is not good enough technology to detect it. However, this point remains a matter of debate among specialists worldwide. In this regard, for example, the American Thyroid Association guidelines do not include vascularity in ultrasonographic risk stratification, whereas for the AACE/ACE/AME task force it represents a high-risk feature for malignancy [8–11].

Very recently, a company (Toshiba Medical System) has developed a new Doppler technique (Superb Microvascular Imaging (SMI)) aimed at improving microvascular flow imaging through a new adaptive algorithm which removes clutter dramatically while maintaining very high frame rates.

The purpose of this pilot study was to assess the nodular microvascular architecture by means of SMI compared to standard CD and PD in a prospective series of thyroid nodules submitted to FNAC, in order to evaluate the potential of SMI in detecting thyroid cancer.

2. Materials and Methods

From April 2016 to July 2017, 254 patients with thyroid nodules were submitted to FNAC at our Department. All the nodules were previously evaluated as high-risk for malignancy in agreement with AACE/ACE/AME guidelines [11]. All subjects were submitted to ultrasound examination consisting of grayscale-US, CD, and PD (frame rate 10-15 Hz) followed by SMI (frame ) using an Aplio 500 ultrasound system (Toshiba Medical System, Japan) with a broad bandwidth linear array transducer (imaging frequency: 14 MHz) before being submitted to FNAC. Grayscale ultrasound was first performed to scan the nodule; subsequently, CD, PD, and SMI were performed to evaluate the vascularity both in and around the lesions. The signal was considered a real blood flow signal only if the pulsed Doppler showed an arterial or venous flow pattern. All ultrasonographic examinations were performed and recorded by the same investigator, who had >15 years of experience in thyroid ultrasound.

All the FNAC were performed using 25-gauge needles and capillary action, using a freehand technique and three passes were made/nodule. After insertion into the nodule, the needle was moved back and forth several times with a rapid but gentle stabbing motion. Cytological specimens were smeared according to the Papanicolaou technique and evaluated by experienced cytopathologists blinded to the ultrasound and Doppler results. When the smear was inadequate, FNAC was repeated once; only technically satisfactory results were considered. All the cytopathology analyses were blinded to the ultrasound and Doppler results.

Initial cytological results from the thyroid FNAC procedures were classified into five diagnostic categories based on the Italian thyroid classification system: TIR1 nondiagnostic, TIR1c nondiagnostic cystic; TIR2 nonmalignant/benign; TIR3A low-risk indeterminate lesion; TIR3B high-risk indeterminate lesion; TIR4 suspicious of malignancy; and TIR5 malignant [14]. All patients with high-risk indeterminate lesion (TIR3B) and suspicious or malignant cytology (TIR4/5) underwent surgery.

Taking into account the low false-negative rate reported in literature [8, 11], negative FNAC was considered sufficient to define the nodules as benign for statistical purposes.

The study was conducted according to the principles of the Helsinki Declaration and the guidelines of the Institutional Ethical Committee. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

The study was approved by the Local Ethical Committee (no. 3192).

3. Results

After a second round of FNAC, 18 (7.1%) patients still had inadequate cytological specimens and were excluded from further analysis. Therefore, a total of 242 nodules with valid cytological specimens were obtained from 236 patients (186 females, 50 males). A single nodule was examined in 228 patients, whereas two were biopsied in 7 patients. Nodule size (as evaluated by ultrasound) ranged from 8 to 54 mm ().

FNAC showed indeterminate lesion (TIR3B) and suspicious or malignant (TIR4/5) results in 157 nodules (65%); all underwent surgery. A diagnosis of carcinoma was histologically confirmed in 128 (81.5%).

Examples of the images acquired with the five modes (grayscale US, CD, PD, colour, and monochrome SMI) are reported in Figure 1. Monochrome and colour SMI depicted microvascular flow in greater detail compared to both CD and PD (Figure 1).

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

Figure 1: Solid nodule in the left lobe: images acquired with the five modes: grayscale US (a), monochrome (b) and colour (c) SMI, CD (d), and PD (e). Monochrome and colour SMI showed microvascular flow in greater detail compared to CD or PD.

The number of blood vessels observed inside benign and malignant nodules by SMI is reported in Table 1.

Table 1: Number of blood vessels observed inside benign and malignant nodules by SMI.

N. of vessels inside the nodule
Benign (%)
Malignant (%)

0
24 (21.2)
3 (2.3)

1-2
44 (38.6)
20 (15.6)

3-4
23 (20.1)
47 (36.7)

>5
23 (20.1)
58 (45.4)

Benign and malignant nodules were stratified in accordance to the number of vessels visualised by SMI: score 1 with a maximum of two blood vessels and score 2 with three or more vessels. Demographic and ultrasound characteristics between patients of SMI score 1 and score 2 cohorts were superimposable except for nodular vascularity (Table 2). Following stratification, a significant different behaviour emerged in the two groups (Figure 2). In detail, score 1 was found in 59.6% of benign nodules and in 17.9% of malignancies, whereas score 2 was found in 40.4% of benign nodules and in 82.1% of malignant ones (sensitivity 81.7%, specificity 60.5%, positive predictive value 76.3%, negative predictive value 68.1%, and accuracy 73.4%; ).

Table 2: Demographic and ultrasound characteristics between patients of SMI score 1 and score 2 cohorts.

SMI
value

SCORE 1 ()
SCORE 2 ()

Gender (F/M)
68/23
118/27
0.127

Age (yr)

0.508

Nodule size (mm)

0.938

Ultrasound feature of nodule

    Hypoechogenicity (Y/N)
68/24
107/43
0.774

    Microcalcification (Y/N)
38/54
65/85
0.431

    Blurred margins (Y/N)
34/58
45/105
0.164

    Intranodular vascularization (Y/N)
29/63
108/42
0.001

Figure 2: Analysis of all 242 nodules with valid cytological specimens: stratification of benign and malignant nodules in accordance to the number of vessels visualised by SMI. Score 1: maximum two blood vessels. Score 2: three or more vessels.

The 128 malignant diagnoses included 116 papillary carcinomas, 9 follicular carcinomas, and 3 Hurtle carcinomas.

There was no significant difference in age, size, hypoechogenicity, microcalcification, and blurred margins between patients with benign and malignant nodules (Table 3). Variables significantly associated with malignancy in the univariate analysis were gender (OR, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.08-0.37; ), vascularity (OR, 1.91; 95% CI, 1.65-3.89; ), and SMI (OR, 6.72; 95% CI, 3.89-11.59; ); multivariate logistic model confirmed SMI score 2 as an independent risk factor for malignancy (OR, 6.99; 95% CI, 3.46-12.09; ) (Table 4).

Table 3: Demographic and ultrasound characteristics between patients with benign and malignant nodule.

Benign nodule
Malignant nodule
value

Gender (F/M)
99/15
93/35
0.005

Age (yr)

0.641

Nodule size (mm)

0.941

Ultrasound feature of nodule

    Hypoechogenicity (Y/N)
83/31
92/36
0.873

    Microcalcification (Y/N)
40/74
63/65
0.018

    Blurred margins (Y/N)
37/77
52/76
0.532

    Intranodular vascularization (Y/N)
48/66
89/39
0.001

    SMI (score 1/2)
45/69
23/105
0.001

Table 4: Multivariate analysis of characteristics predicting the malignancy.

Predictors
OR (95% CI)
value

Gender
0.11 (0.04-0.28)
0.001

Age
0.99 (0.96-1.01)
0.547

Hypoechogenicity
0.79 (0.56-1.13)
0.208

Microcalcification
1.34 (0.69-2.60)
0.373

Blurred margins
0.92 (0.45-1.87)
0.547

Intranodular vascularization
1.90 (1,00-3.63)
0.061

SMI
6.99 (3.46-12.09)
0.001

4. Discussion

The present prospective pilot study showed that SMI can depict intranodular flow in greater detail compared to CDI and PDI, thus improving thyroid cancer detection, in particular in thyroid lesion, without the need for CD and PD vascularity evaluation.

After the first report by Fujimoto et al., which described structural alteration within the thyroid gland by ultrasound evaluation in 1967 [15], this technique has become more and more established, now representing an indispensable tool in the clinical practice for thyroid evaluation. In addition, the most relevant recent guidelines and the scientific societies clearly indicate that thyroid ultrasound should be used to identify nodules with a low risk of cancer for which biopsy could be deferred [8, 10, 11]. However, none of the usual grayscale ultrasound features suggesting malignancy (hypoechogenicity, blurred margins, microcalcifications, and a “taller than wide” shape) is able to detect cancer with significant specificity and sensibility when used alone [13]. Even if vascularity is an important feature of ultrasound evaluation, no agreement has been reached regarding its assessment in thyroid nodule management. Some authors, in fact, claim that intranodular vascularity is useful for predicting thyroid malignancy [16, 17], whereas others demonstrate that this ultrasound aspect does not help to predict thyroid cancer [7, 18–20]. In this view, guidelines of different societies seem to conflict; e.g., the ATA guidelines suggest that intranodular vascularity may be reflective of follicular thyroid cancer but not of papillary cancer, and therefore they do not include it in sonographic risk factors for malignancy [8]. On the contrary, the AACE/ACE/AME guidelines include intranodular vascularity in the list of high-risk features [11]. One of the reasons of disagreement could be the difficulty to obtain the full real vascular information from both CD and PD images. In fact, although the latter is more sensitive than the former in detecting small vessels, they are both limited by clutter and overflow when used under a lower-scale condition, because the clutter (tissue motion artefacts) would overlie real low-velocity blood flow, and the overflow (blood flow signals over the lumen) would deform vessels. The recent introduction of the new Doppler technique (SMI) has improved microvascular flow imaging [21]. This has been in fact recently demonstrated in different fields, such as in breast lesions [22–24], testicular [25] hepatic tumours [26], as well as in low-velocity venous flow following pancreas transplantation [27].

In particular in breast cancer, SMI showed superiority to both colour and power Doppler imaging in detecting tumour vessels, in visualising the details of vessel morphology and both peripheral and central vascular distribution [28]. Its superiority in detecting microvascular flow imaging has also been demonstrated in another set of patients, particularly in little children. In these patients, SMI evidenced more detailed data about testicular vascular structure compared with the CD technique [25].

To date, only a few reports have been published about SMI in thyroid diseases, but they are all in line with the previous data. In particular, Flemming and colleagues showed that SMI can depict peri- and intranodular thyroid microvascular flow in greater detail compared to CD and PD in thyroid nodules [29]. This data was confirmed by Machado et al. two years later [21]. Moreover, Kong et al. have successfully demonstrated that intranodular vascularity on SMI was useful for detecting thyroid cancer in a series of 113 nodules [30]. This present study confirms and extends the previous ones. In particular, SMI increased the sensitivity for detecting thyroid cancer, showing at the multivariate logistic analysis level that the presence of three or more vessels (score 2) is significantly associated to malignancy (OR, 6.99; 95% CI, 3.46-12.09, ).

Despite that intranodular vascularity as an ultrasound feature predictive of malignancy is still a matter of debate, it is well known that the recruitment of new capillary blood vessels is a tool for any tumour in growing [31].

These new vessels are so intensive and tiny at first that colour and power Doppler imaging cannot clearly show the branching details. Power Doppler imaging is limited not only by clutter but also by overflow when displaying minute vessels, which is why penetrating vessels are mistaken as peripheral vessels. On the contrary, since at lower scales there is almost no angle dependence, clutter, or overflow, SMI shows much more complete and genuine vascular branches. Therefore, many avascular nodules can currently be categorised in vascular groups, and the classification of many penetrating vessels previously mistaken as peripheral flow can be corrected.

This study has some limitations. First is selection bias of nodules: we have in fact evaluated only nodules at high risk of malignancy in accordance to AACE/ACE/AME guidelines. An unselected and larger series of nodules should be verified in the future. Second, the morphologic characteristics of vessels, such as smooth versus tortuous, were not evaluated; we only investigated the vascular pattern. Third, we correlated SMI findings with cytological results and not with histological results. Considering the low false-negative rate of FNAC reported in benign nodules [8, 11], we believe that our results can be considered reliable. However, future studies comparing SMI with histological specimens are needed.

In conclusion, the presence of three or more vessels on SMI may be a useful sign to help identify thyroid carcinoma.

Data Availability

The clinical and ultrasound data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Disclosure

This research was performed as part of the employment of the authors at the University of Brescia.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Authors’ Contributions

Carlo Cappelli, Ilenia Pirola, and Claudio Casella conceived the study and helped to draft the manuscript. Fiorella Marini and Davide Lombardi did the literature search and selection. Elena Gandossi, Alessandra Cristiano, Barbara Agosti, and Alberto Ferlin participated in the design of the study, submission to ethical approvals, and data collection. Carlo Cappelli, Ilenia Pirola, and Maurizio Castellano coordinated the statistical analysis. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

References

J. B. Vander, E. A. Gaston, and T. R. Dawber, “The significance of nontoxic thyroid nodules: final report of a 15-year study of the incidence of thyroid malignancy,” Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 537–540, 1968.

S. Ezzat, D. A. Sarti, D. R. Cain, and G. D. Braunstein, “Thyroid incidentalomas: Prevalence by palpation and ultrasonography,” Archive of Internal Medicine, vol. 154, no. 16, pp. 1838–1840, 1994.

A. Brander, P. Viikinkoski, J. Nickels, and L. Kivisaari, “Thyroid gland: US screening in a random adult population,” Radiology, vol. 181, no. 3, pp. 683–687, 1991.

C. Durante, F. Cava, A. Paciaroni, and S. Filetti, “Benign thyroid nodules: diagnostic and therapeutic approach,” Recenti Progressi in Medicina, vol. 99, no. 5, pp. 263–270, 2008.

C. Cappelli, M. Castellano, I. Pirola et al., “Reduced thyroid volume and nodularity in dyslipidaemic patients on statin treatment,” Clinical of Endocrinology, vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 16–21, 2008.

L. Hegedüs, “The thyroid nodule,” The Thyroid Nodule, vol. 351, no. 17, pp. 1764–1771, 2004.

M. C. Frates, C. B. Benson, J. W. Charboneau et al., “Management of thyroid nodules detected at US: Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound consensus conference statement,” Radiology, vol. 237, no. 3, pp. 794–800, 2005.

B. R. Haugen, E. K. Alexander, K. C. Bible et al., “2015 American Thyroid Association management guidelines for adult patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer: the American Thyroid Association Guidelines Task Force on Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer,” Thyroid, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 1–133, 2016.

G. Russ, “Risk stratification of thyroid nodules on ultrasonography with the French TI-RADS: description and reflections,” Ultrasonography, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 25–38, 2016.

J. H. Shin, J. H. Baek, J. Chung et al., “Ultrasonography diagnosis and imaging-based management of thyroid nodules: revised Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology consensus statement and recommendations,” Korean Journal of Radiology, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 370–395, 2016.

H. Gharib, E. Papini, J. R. Garber et al., “AACE/ACE/AME Guidelines. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, American College of Endocrinology, and Associazione Medici Endocrinologi Medical guidelines for clinical practice for the diagnosis and management of thyroid nodules – 2016 update,” Endocrine Practice, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 622–639, 2016.

J. J. Ma, H. Ding, B. H. Xu, L. J. Song, B. J. Huang, and W. P. Wang, “Diagnostic performances of various gray-scale, color doppler, and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography findings in predicting malignant thyroid nodules,” Thyroid, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 355–363, 2014.

C. Cappelli, M. Castellano, I. Pirola et al., “The predictive value of ultrasound findings in the management of thyroid nodules,” QJM, vol. 100, no. 1, pp. 29–35, 2007.

F. Nardi, F. Basolo, A. Crescenzi et al., “Italian consensus for the classification and reporting of thyroid cytology,” Journal of Endocrinological Investigation, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 593–599, 2014.

Y. Fujimoto, A. Oka, R. Omoto, and M. Hirose, “Ultrasound scanning of the thyroid gland as a new diagnostic approach,” Ultrasonics, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 177–180, 1967.

E. Papini, R. Guglielmi, A. Bianchini et al., “Risk of malignancy in nonpalpable thyroid nodules: predictive value of ultrasound and color-Doppler features,” Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 87, no. 5, pp. 1941–1946, 2002.

L. Brunese, A. Romeo, S. Iorio et al., “A new marker for diagnosis of thyroid papillary cancer: B-flow twinkling sign,” Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, vol. 27, no. 8, pp. 1187–1194, 2008.

J. D. Iannuccilli, J. J. Cronan, and J. M. Monchik, “Risk for malignancy of thyroid nodules as assessed by sonographic criteria: the need for biopsy,” Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, vol. 23, no. 11, pp. 1455–1464, 2004.

T. Rago, P. Vitti, L. Chiovato et al., “Role of conventional ultrasonography and color flow-doppler sonography in predicting malignancy in ‘cold’ thyroid nodules,” European Journal of Endocrinology, vol. 138, no. 1, pp. 41–46, 1998.

K. Shimamoto, T. Endo, T. Ishigaki, S. Sakuma, and N. Makino, “Thyroid nodules: evaluation with color Doppler ultrasonography,” Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, vol. 12, no. 11, pp. 673–678, 1993.

P. Machado, S. Segal, A. Lyshchik, and F. Forsberg, “A novel microvascular flow technique: initial results in thyroids,” Ultrasound Quarterly, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 67–74, 2016.

Z. Yongfeng, Z. Ping, L. Wengang, S. Yang, and T. Shuangming, “Application of a novel microvascular imaging technique in breast lesion evaluation,” Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, vol. 42, no. 9, pp. 2097–2105, 2016.

J. Zhan, X. H. Diao, J. M. Jin, L. Chen, and Y. Chen, “Superb Microvascular Imaging—a new vascular detecting ultrasonographic technique for avascular breast masses: a preliminary study,” European Journal of Radiology, vol. 85, no. 5, pp. 915–921, 2016.

X. Y. Xiao, X. Chen, X. F. Guan, H. Wu, W. Qin, and B. M. Luo, “Superb microvascular imaging in diagnosis of breast lesions: a comparative study with contrast-enhanced ultrasonographic microvascular imaging,” The British Journal of Radiology, vol. 89, no. 1066, 2016.

L. Karaca, A. Oral, M. Kantarci et al., “Comparison of the superb microvascular imaging technique and the color Doppler techniques for evaluating children’s testicular blood flow,” European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences, vol. 20, no. 10, pp. 1947–1953, 2016.

D. H. Lee, J. Y. Lee, and J. K. Han, “Superb microvascular imaging technology for ultrasound examinations: initial experiences for hepatic tumors,” European Journal of Radiology, vol. 85, no. 11, pp. 2090–2095, 2016.

K. Tokodai, S. Miyagi, C. Nakanishi et al., “The utility of superb microvascular imaging for monitoring low-velocity venous flow following pancreas transplantation: report of a case,” Journal of Medical Ultrasonics, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 171–174, 2018.

A. Park, B. Seo, S. Cha, S. Yeom, S. Lee, and H. Chung, “An innovative ultrasound technique for evaluation of tumor vascularity in breast cancers: superb micro-vascular imaging,” Journal of Breast Cancer, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 210–213, 2016.

F. Forsberg, P. Machado, S. Segal et al., “Microvascular blood flow in the thyroid: preliminary results with a novel imaging technique,” in 2014 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium, pp. 2237–2240, Denver, CO, USA, September 2014.

J. Kong, J. C. Li, H. Y. Wang et al., “Role of superb micro-vascular imaging in the preoperative evaluation of thyroid nodules: comparison with power Doppler flow imaging,” Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, vol. 36, no. 7, pp. 1329–1337, 2017.

J. Folkman, “Tumor angiogenesis: therapeutic implications,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 285, no. 21, pp. 1182–1186, 1971.