International Journal of Electrochemistry
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 904128, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/904128

Research Article

Effect of Low Cobalt Loading on TiO₂ Nanotube Arrays for Water-Splitting

Alfonso Pozio

ENEA, C.R. Casaccia, Via Anguillarese 301, S. Maria di Galeria, 00123 Rome, Italy

Received 28 July 2014; Revised 14 October 2014; Accepted 14 October 2014; Published 9 November 2014

Academic Editor: Emmanuel Maisonhaute

Copyright © 2014 Alfonso Pozio. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

This work is intended to define a new possible methodology for the TiO₂ doping through the use of an electrochemical deposition of cobalt directly on the titanium nanotubes obtained by a previous galvanostatic anodization treatment in an ethylene glycol solution. This method does not seem to cause any influence on the nanotube structure, showing final products with news and interesting features with respect to the unmodified sample. Together with an unmodified photoconversion efficiency under UV light, the cobalt doped specimen reports an increase of the electrocatalytic efficiency for the oxygen evolution reaction (OER).

1. Introduction

The publication of the fundamental work of Gong et al. [1], in which the authors created the basis for the development of a new synthesis model for the titania nanotubes based on the anodic oxidation of a titanium foil in fluoride based solutions, opened the way to a new methodology able to combine a simplicity of preparation of the material with a complete control of physical characteristics of the nanosystem [2–5]. Besides, its particular geometric shape is particularly appropriate for application as photo-anode in the photo-electrolysis of water [6]. For this reason, many studies have been directed towards this field, obtaining elevated values of UV photoconversion efficiency for these nanosystems [7, 8]. In the meanwhile, a large range of different applications for this material has been discovered. In fact, for example, it is reported that the electrical resistance of the titania nanotubes was highly sensitive to the chemisorbed hydrogen molecules hydrogen sensing [9, 10], creating a new route in the hydrogen sensing research field [11, 12]. But many other similar examples of the wide versatility of the TiO₂ nanotube arrays are available in literature, as the dye-sensitized solar cells [13–17], lithium batteries [18], and also in different biological and medical researches, like the osteoblast growth [19–22] or drug elution [23–25]. As regards the application of the TiO₂ nanotube arrays as photo-electrodes for water photoelectrolysis, it is important to emphasize that although many important results have been reached in this field, the commercialization of such nanosystem is still far because of the high band gap of titania, which limits the light adsorption only to limited UV region [6]. In addition, also the titania electrocatalytic activity for the OER is very low if compared with that obtained on conventional metallic electrodes (Pt, Ni, etc.). These problems limit the use of this material due to the low current density produced both in conventional mode or in photo-assisted mode. For this reason, a different strategy based on the use of cocatalyst able to enhance the activity for the O₂ evolution maintaining the photo-activity constant can be useful. This type of electrode could be used indifferently in a photo-assisted or in a conventional electrolyser in absence or in the presence of a UV light source. In the past, most researchers focused their attention on the doping of these nanostructures mainly in order to shift the light absorption to lower energy region [26–39]. As alternative, the use of cocatalyst to enhance reactivity was first observed for the photoconversion of H₂O to H₂ and O₂ using the Pt-TiO₂ system [40]. The addition of metals to a semiconductor can change the photocatalytic process by changing the semiconductor surface properties. The metal can enhance the yield of a particular product or the rate of the photocatalytic reaction. On the other side, the metal can be important also because of its own electrocatalytic activity. In our case, the functions of oxidation cocatalyst are applied to O₂ evolution from the electrocatalytic water oxidation. Representative water oxidation inorganic cocatalysts include ruthenium oxide, cobalt oxide, and iridium oxide [41]. Deposition of , , and cocatalysts on n-semiconductors seems all to enhance the activity for O₂ evolution and was found to be the best one. As example, Surendranath et al. described the self-assembly of a highly active cobalt-based oxygen evolving catalyst that forms as a thin film on inert electrodes when aqueous solutions of Co²⁺ salts are electrolyzed in presence of phosphate or borate [42]. These authors evidenced that this catalyst can be interfaced with light absorbing and charge separating materials to affect photoelectrochemical water-splitting. In addition, it can be formed in situ under mild conditions on a variety of conductive substrates and it exhibits high activity at high pH and room temperature.

In the past, Shrestha et al. loaded self-organized TiO₂ nanotubes grown by anodization of Ti-substrate in glycerol-water electrolyte containing fluoride with Ni oxide nanoparticles by a simple chemical bath precipitation technique. Unfortunately, the photocurrent in UV light region decreased significantly which was possibly due to the blockage of UV light by Ni oxide particles [43].

In this work, we electrodeposited very small amount of cobalt on TiO₂ nanotubes grown by anodization of Ti-substrate in ethylene glycol electrolyte containing fluoride, using an in situ method already tested in the past on nickel anodes [44, 45]. We have found that cobalt-titania nanotube arrays own different features with respect to the starting structure. The photoconversion efficiency did not change; the energy gap and the levels of conduction and valence band were equal. In contrast, the catalytic activity for the OER increased greatly at the same level of a conventional metallic electrode. We retain the fact that this methodology, if optimized and deepened, could open a new route to the best effective doping of the titania nanotube arrays able to work both in photo-assisted mode and conventional mode.

2. Experiment

2.1. Materials and Photo-Electrode Preparation

A small disk of commercially pure grade-3 titanium (Titania, Italy) has been used as substrate for the nanotube growth. The circular sample had a diameter of 15 mm with a thickness of 0.5 mm and was arranged to show an active circular area of 1 cm². The unmodified sample (TiO₂/Ti) was prepared with the methodology previously developed in different articles [8, 44]. Briefly, after 3 min. pickling in an HF (Carlo Erba)/HNO₃ (Carlo Erba) solution made by a volumetric ratio of 1 : 3 and diluted in deionised water until 100 mL, the titanium disks have been set in a three-electrode cell containing a 1 M KOH solution (Carlo Erba) and subjected to a prefixed and optimized density current (1 mA/cm²) generated by a potentiostat/galvanostat (Solartron 1286) for 3 min. The counter-electrode was a platinum sheet, while the reference was a standard calomel electrode (SCE). The anodic growth of the nanotube arrays has been obtained in a two-electrode cell with a platinum counter-electrode, using a glycol ethylene (Ashland) solution with 1%wt. H₂O and 0.2%wt. NH₄F and applying 60 V for 3 h by means of a potentiostat/galvanostat PS251-2 (Aldrich). The current has been measured with a Keithley 2000 multimeter and has been acquired with a MadgeTech Volt101 digital recorder placed in series with a calibrated resistance (300 Ω) (Leeds and Northrup) (Figure 1).

Figure 1: Scheme of anodization system.

After the anodization, the sample was washed in glycol ethylene and left overnight in a dry room. Then, after a heat treatment at 90°C in vacuum for 3 hours, the sample has been placed in a tubular furnace (Lenton) for 1 h at 580°C with a slope of 1°C min⁻¹ in air. This step transforms amorphous TiO₂ nanotubes into a crystalline anatase phase, which shows a higher photo-sensibility.

After the physical and electrochemical characterizations, the same TiO₂/Ti sample was loaded with cobalt in order to obtain modified nanotube arrays Co-TiO₂/Ti. Using Figure 1 system, cobalt’s atoms have been electrodeposited on the TiO₂/Ti specimen. The electrodes were placed at a distance of 1 cm in a KOH 2.5 M solution containing (Carlo Erba) corresponding to 20 ppm of cobalt and TiO₂/Ti electrode was anodized at 0.2 mA for 18 h.

After the deposition the sample was washed in distilled water and left overnight in a dry room. Then, the doped sample has underwent again the physical and electrochemical characterizations in order to evaluate the difference.

2.2. Surface Analysis

The material structure was investigated with a Rigaku Miniflex diffractometer. The patterns were obtained using a Cu Kα radiation from a rotating anode source operating at 30 kV and 15 mA. The specimens were scanned at 0.02° s⁻¹ in the continuous scan mode over the 2θ range 20–120°.

The morphology of samples was investigated with a scanning electron microscopy JEOL JSM5510LV.

2.3. Electrochemical Measurements

The electrochemical measurements were performed using a system similar to the one described by Shankar et al. [7]. Briefly, it is made of a Pyrex cell with a 1.5 cm diameter quartz window, where the light, emitted by UV (Ultravitalux Osram) lamp, is placed at distance of 4.5 cm. The source has a spectrum with peak intensity in the UVA region at 360, 400 nm and the UV intensity, which is measured on the sample by a photo-radiometer HD2302.0 (Delta OHM) over the spectral range 220–400 nm, is 24 W m⁻². Along the optical path to the cell, a lens was interposed in order to collimate the radiation of the light source. The active surface of the sample (1 cm²) was immersed in a KOH 1 M solution and placed at 0.5 cm from the quartz window (Figure 2). Photocurrents and “open-circuit potential” (OCP) measurements were made in the cell of Figure 2 via a potentiostat 1287 (Solartron). The measurements of photo-current were performed with a scan rate of 20 mV s⁻¹ in the range of potential  V versus NHE in conditions of presence and absence of UV. The OCP measures were recorded in the presence and absence of UV.

Figure 2: Experimental setup.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Co Electrodeposited TiO₂ Nanotube Arrays

The loading of the TiO₂/Ti specimen is based on the evidence that in situ activation of Ni anodes with cobalt ions in KOH electrolyte during water electrolysis results in a marked increase of electrocatalytic activity [45]. In a basic environment, the cobalt is precipitated as hydroxide ; however at high pH as in the case in question there is the formation of the complex , where the constant of complexation is :

From equation of the equilibrium constant of complexation (2), we obtain the concentration of the cobalt ion in the form of complex which is equal to about 1.5 ppm. In previous works, by means of atomic absorption, a cobalt concentration of about 2 ppm was measured [45, 46].

So, we have ion release in the KOH solution that can be used as doping agent for the TiO₂ nanotubes cathode. Obviously, during the long-time electrolysis the main anode reaction is the oxygen evolution (OER) but cobalt atoms can be electrodeposited into the nanotubes surface in the form of cobalt oxide according to the reaction:

The XRD pattern of nanotube TiO₂/Ti, obtained through electrosynthesis route, is depicted in Figure 3. From comparison with the Co-TiO₂/Ti-substrate pattern (black trace), no difference can be noted and all features typical of the titanium metal and TiO₂ are observed. Particularly, a few peaks ascribable to titanium oxide material anatase and rutile can be recognized [47, 48]. The results indicate that Co doping does not introduce changes in the TiO₂ structure.

Figure 3: XRD pattern of nanotube TiO₂/Ti and Co-TiO₂/Ti obtained through electrosynthesis route; (A) anatase, (R) rutile, and (▼) titanium. The dashed lines indicate the Co₃O₄ and the fcc-Co position [49].

This result is confirmed by the SEM analysis for the Co-TiO₂/Ti reported in Figure 4. The structure of titanium oxide nanotubes is clearly highlighted by the top view image. No difference can be noted with typical TiO₂/Ti nanotube structure already evidenced in previous works [8, 44].

Figure 4: SEM top view of sample Co-TiO₂/Ti.

3.2. Analysis of the Photoelectrochemical Performance

Figure 5 shows the open-circuit potential () for TiO₂/Ti and Co-TiO₂/Ti with UV on and off. When applying the UV, decreases sharply and it reaches a steady state at a lower potential. After switching off the light source, increases rapidly in the first seconds and then slowly until a new steady state level. In UV on condition, the doped electrode shows an of −0.49 V versus NHE while the undoped one −0.54 V. The low decrease of potential indicates a minimal effect on the degree of band bending for the doped -type metal oxide semiconductor.

Figure 5: Open-circuit potential at UV on and off for TiO₂/Ti (red) and Co-TiO₂/Ti (blue).

Figure 6 shows the curves of photocurrent and photoelectrochemical performance of TiO₂/Ti and Co-TiO₂/Ti. The corresponding dark current for Co-TiO₂/Ti is also represented for comparison.

Figure 6: UV photocurrent density and efficiency versus voltage for TiO₂/Ti (∘) and Co-TiO₂/Ti in UV (×) and in dark (—).

The photoconversion efficiency , which is the light energy to chemical energy conversion efficiency, is calculated as [7]

where is the photocurrent density (mA cm⁻²), is the total power output, is the electrical power input, and is the power density of incident light, which is 2.4 mW cm⁻². is the standard reversible potential of 1.23 V/NHE. The applied potential can be calculated:

where is the electrode potential (versus NHE) of the working electrode, at which photocurrent was measured under illumination, and is the electrode potential (versus NHE) of the same working electrode at open-circuit conditions under the same illumination and in the same electrolyte.

After doping, the efficiency of photoelectrochemical remains virtually unchanged (8%) as well as the photo-potential onset of for the discharge of the water around −0.75 V versus NHE and the potential onset of 0.77 V versus NHE. However, at the same time there is a complementary increase in the electrocatalytic activity highlighted by the increase in current for higher potential to that reaches 680% at 1.5 V.

The flat band potential has been determined for both electrodes from the photocurrent measurements applying the equation [50, 51]

where denotes the donor density, the relative dielectric constant of the TiO₂ anodic film (55) [52], the vacuum permittivity ( F cm⁻¹), the charge of an electron ( C), and the light absorption coefficient for the material.

The flat band potential (), calculated in Figure 7 as the intercept with the abscissa, remains constant showing that the cobalt doping does not change the energy levels of the conduction band and valence from the sample nanotube.

Figure 7: Square photocurrent versus electrode potential for TiO₂/Ti (×) and Co-TiO₂/Ti (∘).

All the photoelectrochemical characteristics of TiO₂/Ti and Co-TiO₂/Ti are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1: Photo-electrochemical characteristic of TiO₂/Ti and Co-TiO₂/Ti anodes.

Sample

@1.5 V

V vs NHE
%
V vs NHE (eV)
V vs NHE
mA cm⁻²

TiO₂/Ti
−0.56
7.98
−0.61 (−4.05)
−1.01
0.40

Co-TiO₂/Ti
−0.49
8.22
−0.55 (−3.99)
−0.95
3.13

In considering light receptor electrodes for photoelectrochemical cells an important criterion is the absolute position of the valence (VB) and conduction bands (CB). In fact, fast electron transfer across the electrolyte semiconductor interface occurs when the appropriate band overlaps the redox level of the electrolyte. This is important since recombination of the photo-generated electron-hole pair competes with the electron transfer, and thus these relative rates influence quantum efficiency. The absolute position of the bands effectively controls the degree of band bending, , since the surface Fermi level, , for the heavily doped -type metal oxide semiconductor essentially coincides with the CB level. The value of is generally taken as the difference between and the “Fermi level” of the electrolyte which is taken as the redox potential for the reaction occurring at the photo-electrode [53]:

For water oxidation in alkaline media (6) and for TiO₂/Ti -type semiconductor photo-electrode is the potential:

The maximum open-circuit photo-potential value is and if it exceeds 1.23 V, then it is possible to run water-splitting without any other energy source other than the light. To the extent that falls short of 1.23 V (plus any required overvoltage) one requires an additional energy input assisting the effect; an applied potential, , must be supplied to provide the difference. Since for the materials of interest here, we can conclude from this discussion that the CB position must be 1.23 V above the . This analysis evidences that Co doping does not change the absolute position of the valence and conduction band, thus leaving the photo-catalytic properties unchanged.

4. Conclusion

In this work, we have reported a preliminary study for a new possible doping route for TiO₂ nanotubes. This methodology, yet to be improved and optimized, shows as a first positive feature the fact that the doping with Co into the TiO₂ nanotubes does not produce relevant changes in the electronic structure, thus maintaining the photochemical properties but it improves greatly the electrocatalytic properties of the electrode for the OER. The in situ activation of titania nanotubes in alkaline environment with cobalt ions is a very cheap method to produce electrodes able to work indifferently in photo-assisted or conventional mode.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

References

D. Gong, C. A. Grimes, O. K. Varghese et al., “Titanium oxide nanotube arrays prepared by anodic oxidation,” Journal of Materials Research, vol. 16, no. 12, pp. 3331–3334, 2001.

G. K. Mor, O. K. Varghese, M. Paulose, N. Mukherjee, and C. A. Grimes, “Fabrication of tapered, conical-shaped titania nanotubes,” Journal of Materials Research, vol. 18, no. 11, pp. 2588–2593, 2003.

Q. Cai, M. Paulose, O. K. Varghese, and C. A. Grimes, “The effect of electrolyte composition on the fabrication of self-organized titanium oxide nanotube arrays by anodic oxidation,” Journal of Materials Research, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 230–236, 2005.

A. G. Kontos, A. I. Kontos, D. S. Tsoukleris et al., “Photo-induced effects on self-organized TiO₂ nanotube arrays: The influence of surface morphology,” Nanotechnology, vol. 20, no. 4, Article ID 045603, 2009.

G. K. Mor, K. Shankar, M. Paulose, O. K. Varghese, and C. A. Grimes, “Enhanced photocleavage of water using titania nanotube arrays,” Nano Letters, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 191–195, 2005.

C. A. Grimes, O. K. Varghese, and S. Ranjan, The Solar Hydrogen Generation by Water Photoelectrolysis, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2008.

K. Shankar, G. K. Mor, H. E. Prakasam et al., “Highly-ordered TiO₂ nanotube arrays up to 220 μm in length: use in water photoelectrolysis and dye-sensitized solar cells,” Nanotechnology, vol. 18, no. 6, Article ID 065707, 2007.

F. Mura, A. Masci, M. Pasquali, and A. Pozio, “Stable TiO₂ nanotube arrays with high UV photoconversion efficiency,” Electrochimica Acta, vol. 55, no. 7, pp. 2246–2251, 2010.

O. K. Varghese, D. Gong, M. Paulose, K. G. Ong, E. C. Dickey, and C. A. Grimes, “Extreme changes in the electrical resistance of titania nanotubes with hydrogen exposure,” Advanced Materials, vol. 15, no. 7-8, pp. 624–627, 2003.

O. K. Varghese, D. Gong, M. Paulose, K. G. Ong, and C. A. Grimes, “Hydrogen sensing using titania nanotubes,” Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, vol. 93, no. 1–3, pp. 338–344, 2003.

Q. Chen, D. Xu, Z. Wu, and Z. Liu, “Free-standing TiO₂ nanotube arrays made by anodic oxidation and ultrasonic splitting,” Nanotechnology, vol. 19, no. 36, Article ID 365708, 2008.

E. Şennik, Z. Çolak, N. Kilinç, and Z. Z. Öztürk, “Synthesis of highly-ordered TiO₂ nanotubes for a hydrogen sensor,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 35, no. 9, pp. 4420–4427, 2010.

G. K. Mor, K. Shankar, M. Paulose, O. K. Varghese, and C. A. Grimes, “High efficiency double heterojunction polymer photovoltaic cells using highly ordered TiO₂ nanotube arrays,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 91, Article ID 152111, 2007.

G. K. Mor, J. Basham, M. Paulose et al., “High-efficiency förster resonance energy transfer in solid-state dye sensitized solar cells,” Nano Letters, vol. 10, no. 7, pp. 2387–2394, 2010.

Y. Wang, H. Yang, Y. Liu et al., “The use of Ti meshes with self-organized TiO₂ nanotubes as photoanodes of all-Ti dye-sensitized solar cells,” Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 285–290, 2010.

Y. Alivov and Z. Y. Fan, “Dye-sensitized solar cells using TiO₂ nanoparticles transformed from nanotube arrays,” Journal of Materials Science, vol. 45, no. 11, pp. 2902–2906, 2010.

Z. Liu and M. Misra, “Bifacial dye-sensitized solar cells based on vertically oriented TiO₂ nanotube arrays,” Nanotechnology, vol. 21, no. 12, Article ID 125703, 2010.

D. Fang, S.-Q. Liu, R.-Y. Chen et al., “Fabrication and characterization of highly ordered porous anodic titania on titanium substrate,” Journal of Inorganic Materials, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 647–651, 2008.

S.-H. Oh, R. R. Finõnes, C. Daraio, L.-H. Chen, and S. Jin, “Growth of nano-scale hydroxyapatite using chemically treated titanium oxide nanotubes,” Biomaterials, vol. 26, no. 24, pp. 4938–4943, 2005.

S. Oh and S. Jin, “Titanium oxide nanotubes with controlled morphology for enhanced bone growth,” Materials Science and Engineering C, vol. 26, no. 8, pp. 1301–1306, 2006.

H. J. Oh, J. H. Lee, Y. J. Kim, S. J. Suh, and C. S. Chi, “Surface characteristics of porous anodic TiO₂ layer for biomedical applications,” Materials Chemistry and Physics, vol. 109, no. 1, pp. 10–14, 2008.

K. Das, A. Bandyopadhyay, and S. Bose, “Biocompatibility and in situ growth of TiO₂ nanotubes on Ti using different electrolyte chemistry,” Journal of the American Ceramic Society, vol. 91, no. 9, pp. 2808–2814, 2008.

K. C. Popat, M. Eltgroth, T. J. LaTempa, C. A. Grimes, and T. A. Desai, “Decreased Staphylococcus epidermis adhesion and increased osteoblast functionality on antibiotic-loaded titania nanotubes,” Biomaterials, vol. 28, no. 32, pp. 4880–4888, 2007.

K. C. Popat, M. Eltgroth, T. J. LaTempa, C. A. Grimes, and T. A. Desai, “Titania nanotubes: a novel platform for drug-eluting coatings for medical implants?” Small, vol. 3, no. 11, pp. 1878–1881, 2007.

L. Peng, A. D. Mendelsohn, T. J. LaTempa, S. Yoriya, C. A. Grimes, and T. A. Desai, “Long-term small molecule and protein elution from TiO₂ nanotubes,” Nano Letters, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 1932–1936, 2009.

Y. Wang, C. Feng, Z. Jin, J. Zhang, J. Yang, and S. Zhang, “A novel N-doped TiO₂ with high visible light photocatalytic activity,” Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical, vol. 260, no. 1-2, pp. 1–3, 2006.

A. Ghicov, J. M. Macak, H. Tsuchiya et al., “Ion implantation and annealing for an efficient N-doping of TiO₂ nanotubes,” Nano Letters, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 1080–1082, 2006.

A. Ghicov, J. M. Macak, H. Tsuchiya, et al., “TiO₂ nanotube layers: dose effects during nitrogen doping by ion implantation,” Chemical Physics Letters, vol. 419, pp. 426–429, 2006.

K. Shankar, K. C. Tep, G. K. Mor, and C. A. Grimes, “An electrochemical strategy to incorporate nitrogen in nanostructured TiO₂ thin films: modification of bandgap and photoelectrochemical properties,” Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, vol. 39, no. 11, pp. 2361–2366, 2006.

Q. Li and J. K. Shang, “Self-organized nitrogen and fluorine co-doped titanium oxide nanotube arrays with enhanced visible light photocatalytic performance,” Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 43, no. 23, pp. 8923–8929, 2009.

L. Dong, Y. Ma, Y. Wang et al., “Preparation and characterization of nitrogen-doped titania nanotubes,” Materials Letters, vol. 63, no. 18-19, pp. 1598–1600, 2009.

J. Xu, Y. Ao, M. Chen, and D. Fu, “Photoelectrochemical property and photocatalytic activity of N-doped TiO₂ nanotube arrays,” Applied Surface Science, vol. 256, no. 13, pp. 4397–4401, 2010.

J. H. Park, S. Kim, and A. J. Bard, “Novel carbon-doped TiO₂ nanotube arrays with high aspect ratios for efficient solar water splitting,” Nano Letters, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 24–28, 2006.

K. S. Raja, M. Misra, V. K. Mahajan, T. Gandhi, P. Pillai, and S. K. Mohapatra, “Photo-electrochemical hydrogen generation using band-gap modified nanotubular titanium oxide in solar light,” Journal of Power Sources, vol. 161, no. 2, pp. 1450–1457, 2006.

G. Wu, T. Nishikawa, B. Ohtani, and A. Chen, “Synthesis and characterization of carbon-doped TiO₂ nanostructures with enhanced visible light response,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 19, no. 18, pp. 4530–4537, 2007.

S. K. Mohapatra, M. Misra, V. K. Mahajan, and K. S. Raja, “Design of a highly efficient photoelectrolytic cell for hydrogen generation by water splitting: Application of TiO2-xCx nanotubes as a photoanode and Pt/TiO₂ nanotubes as a cathode,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 111, no. 24, pp. 8677–8685, 2007.

R. Hahn, A. Ghicov, J. Salonen, V.-P. Lehto, and P. Schmuki, “Carbon doping of self-organized TiO₂ nanotube layers by thermal acetylene treatment,” Nanotechnology, vol. 18, no. 10, Article ID 105604, 2007.

N. Lu, H. Zhao, J. Li, X. Quan, and S. Chen, “Characterization of boron-doped TiO₂ nanotube arrays prepared by electrochemical method and its visible light activity,” Separation and Purification Technology, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 668–673, 2008.

Y. Su, S. Han, X. Zhang, X. Chen, and L. Lei, “Preparation and visible-light-driven photoelectrocatalytic properties of boron-doped TiO₂ nanotubes,” Materials Chemistry and Physics, vol. 110, no. 2-3, pp. 239–246, 2008.

A. L. Linsebigler, G. Lu, and J. T. Yates, “Photocatalysis on TiO₂ surfaces: principles, mechanisms, and selected results,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 95, no. 3, pp. 735–758, 1995.

J. Yang, D. Wang, H. Han, and C. Li, “Roles of cocatalysts in photocatalysis and photoelectrocatalysis,” Accounts of Chemical Research, vol. 46, no. 8, pp. 1900–1909, 2013.

Y. Surendranath, M. W. Kanan, and D. G. Nocera, “Mechanistic studies of the oxygen evolution reaction by a cobalt-phosphate catalyst at neutral pH,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 132, no. 46, pp. 16501–16509, 2010.

N. K. Shrestha, M. Yang, Y.-C. Nah, I. Paramasivam, and P. Schmuki, “Self-organized TiO₂ nanotubes: visible light activation by Ni oxide nanoparticle decoration,” Electrochemistry Communications, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 254–257, 2010.

F. Mura, A. Masci, M. Pasquali, and A. Pozio, “Effect of a galvanostatic treatment on the preparation of highly ordered TiO₂ nanotubes,” Electrochimica Acta, vol. 54, no. 14, pp. 3794–3798, 2009.

L. Giorgi and A. Pozio, “Nickel anodes in situ activation with cobalt in alkaline electrolyzers,” in Proceedings of the 1st World Conference on Environmental Catalysis for a better World and Life, vol. 1, pp. 647–650, Italian Chemical Society, 1995.

S. Scaccia, “Determination of traces of Ni, Co and Fe in Li₂CO₃/K₂CO₃ melts by flame atomic absorption spectrometry,” Talanta, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 467–472, 1999.

K. Thamaphat, P. Limsuwan, and B. Ngotawornchai, “Phase characterization of TiO₂ powder by XRD and TEM,” Natural Science, vol. 42, pp. 357–361, 2008.

R. Nashed, P. Szymanski, M. A. El-Sayed, and N. K. Allam, “Self-Assembled nanostructured photoanodes with staggered bandgap for efficient solar energy conversion,” ACS Nano, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 4915–4923, 2014.

N. Fischer, E. van Steen, and M. Claeys, “Preparation of supported nano-sized cobalt oxide and fcc cobalt crystallites,” Catalysis Today, vol. 171, no. 1, pp. 174–179, 2011.

H. Gerischer, “The role of semiconductor structure and surface properties in photoelectrochemical processes,” Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry and Interfacial Electrochemistry, vol. 150, no. 1, pp. 553–569, 1982.

M. Radecka, M. Rekas, A. Trenczek-Zajac, and K. Zakrzewska, “Importance of the band gap energy and flat band potential for application of modified TiO₂ photoanodes in water photolysis,” Journal of Power Sources, vol. 181, no. 1, pp. 46–55, 2008.

D. Scharnweber, R. Beutner, S. Rößler, and H. Worch, “Electrochemical behavior of titanium-based materials—are there relations to biocompatibility?” Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, vol. 13, no. 12, pp. 1215–1220, 2002.

J. M. Bolts and M. S. Wrighton, “Correlation of photocurrent-voltage curves with flat-band potential for stable photoelectrodes for the photoelectrolysis of water,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry, vol. 80, no. 24, pp. 2641–2645, 1976.