Remote Sensing of Aboveground Biomass in Tropical Secondary Forests : A Review

Tropical landscapes are, in general, a mosaic of pasture, agriculture, and forest undergoing various stages of succession. Forest succession is comprised of continuous structural changes over time and results in increases in aboveground biomass (AGB). New remote sensingmethods, including sensors, image processing, statisticalmethods, and uncertainty evaluations, are constantly being developed to estimate biophysical forest changes. We review 318 peer-reviewed studies related to the use of remotely sensed AGB estimations in tropical forest succession studies and summarize their geographic distribution, sensors and methods used, and their most frequent ecological inferences. Remotely sensed AGB is broadly used in forest management studies, conservation status evaluations, carbon source and sink investigations, and for studies of the relationships between environmental conditions and forest structure. Uncertainties in AGB estimations were found to be heterogeneous with biases related to sensor type, processing methodology, ground truthing availability, and forest characteristics. Remotely sensed AGB of successional forests is more reliable for the study of spatial patterns of forest succession and over large time scales than that of individual stands. Remote sensing of temporal patterns in biomass requires further study, in particular, as it is critical for understanding forest regrowth at scales useful for regional or global analyses.


Introduction
Secondary and disturbed forests comprise roughly 30-50% of the area covered by tropical forests [1][2][3][4].These forests play important roles as habitats for animal and plant species [5][6][7] and store significant amount of carbon per unit area [8].Secondary forests emerge following natural or human disturbances, such as clearing, selective logging, introduction of invasive species, storms, or wild fires.Forest succession is a natural response to these disturbances and occurs at varying rates and in different directions, as indicated through species composition and forest structure, depending on environment conditions [9].Changes in structure and species composition during forest succession typically result in substantial increases in aboveground biomass [10,11].Thereby spatial and temporal changes in aboveground biomass (AGB) can be useful indicator of the velocity and direction of the forest succession and patterns of AGB distribution and change through time can help to understand how forest structure is related to the natural environmental conditions [12,13] and global carbon cycle [14].
The use of continuous forest metrics obtained using remote sensing (RS) data, for example, aboveground biomass, tree diameter, canopy height, and canopy closure, enables improved characterization of the forest [15] and allows an improved understanding of the ecological drivers behind land cover dynamics [16].However, challenges exist to estimate biophysical data via available remote sensing technologies, such as optical, radar, and LiDAR data, which form the main tools capable of estimating forest AGB [12,[17][18][19].One issue is due to the varying spatial, temporal, radiometric, and spectral resolutions unique to each sensor system, resulting in different advantages and disadvantages to AGB estimation [20,21].
The use of estimated forest biomass in ecology depends on the cost-benefit relationship that includes image accessibility, availability of image processing techniques, and data confidence.The available literature provides an overall view of RS 2 International Journal of Forestry Research Table 1: Major issues discussed in the reviewed references and the information derived from the aboveground biomass (AGB) estimation by using remote sensing data.

Topic
Information derived Reference Forest regrowth (i) Identifying forest regenerating processes using temporal AGB comparison [28,29,37,38,88,[104][105][106]] (ii) Forest structure and AGB changing across forest successional gradient (iii) Secondary forest detection Human impact on forest biomass (i) AGB differences due to disturbance regimes [26,28,49,86, 102] (ii) Effect of invasive tree species on the stored AGB and forest structure Forest responses to ecological conditions (i) AGB differences between vegetation physiognomies [12,13,53,73,94, 104] (ii) Forest structure differences related to topoedaphic gradients, climatic conditions, or past land use Carbon sink, source, and storage (i) Carbon sequestration [12,26,29,30,102,[106][107][108][109][110][111]] (ii) Carbon amount before specific human impact (iii) Identifying management action that can improve carbon storage Modeling evaluation (i) Testing modeling approach [17,18,30,37,41,78,87,88,98,102,[112][113][114][115][116][117][118][119][120][121] (ii) Image processing techniques (iii) Influence of different spatial scale (iv) Simulation approach Sensor evaluation (i) Testing the performance of specific satellite data to estimate biomass and forest structure [28, 50, 104, 105, 107, 111-113, 116, 118, 121-131] (ii) Testing the AGB accuracy between successional stages (iii) Testing performance of specific satellite data to temporal comparison on forest biomass estimation [20,21] and evaluates specific sensors and techniques [19].However, an integrated effectiveness evaluation of how the AGB estimated with RS data can be used to study the progress of the forest succession and the secondary forest characteristics that interfere in the biomass estimation is missing.Therefore, there is a need for a critical review covering the advantages and limitations of the use of remotely sensed AGB in the evaluation of drivers and paths of the forest succession.In this review we discuss how remote sensing of forests biomass helps to identify forest successional patterns.Our specific objectives are (a) to discuss subtle characteristics of secondary forests that challenge the use of remotely sensed AGB estimations in forest succession studies, (b) to summarize the most frequent ecological inferences discussed and methods used in the literature, and (c) to evaluate the implications of methodological and technological issues in the AGB estimation.We first analyze the potential use of remotely sensed AGB estimations as an ecological variable and then discuss the implications for studies of forest succession.We then summarize the ecological issues mentioned in and the methodological characteristics of the selected studies.We conclude with a discussion of the implications of the findings and highlight opportunities for future investigation.

Database
Relevant journal articles were found by using keyword searches in the Web of Science and Scopus Databases (accessed in January 2014) and by looking through the reference lists of previous narrative reviews [16,19,20].All searches included the words "tropical forest, " "aboveground (or above ground or above-ground) biomass or carbon stock, " and "remote sensing" (or "sensed").Our database selected by the keyword searches consisted of 318 articles and reviews.We found a continuous increase on the number of publications about biomass and carbon stock on tropical forests over the last 29 years (Figure 1).In addition, the higher number of published articles in the last 5-8 years may be related to the increased global interest on climate change.Research institutions from the United States, Brazil, United Kingdom, Germany, and France published most of these articles (Figure 2).The selected articles were published in 101 journals; however, 23% of them were published only in two journals: "Remote Sensing of Environment" and "International Journal of Remote Sensing." This total database was used to identify the main ecological questions dealt with in the literature.The studies selected by our literature search discussed different ecological problems, including biological invasions, carbon sources and sinks, conservation status, habitat suitability, technical management comparisons, and biomass map elaboration (Table 1).These subjects were discussed in the present review because each is closely related to the forest succession process.
We refined our final database using the new following criteria: (a) the search words had to be reported either in the title, abstract, author keywords, or plus keywords; and (b) the aboveground biomass estimation had to be performed using biophysical structure (i.e., length, diameter, and crown size) and remote sensing data.Our final database consisted of 50 articles, which all met the refined criteria and directly or indirectly discuss forest succession patterns and processes.Figure 3 shows the geographic location and spatial resolution of all selected studies.The studies were highly concentrated on Brazilian Amazon, Costa Rica, and Borneo and many of the papers shared the same studied location to collect field data.Approximately, 50% of these studies were done by institutions located outside the studied country.

Estimated Aboveground Biomass as a Variable in Forest Succession Studies
Forest patches regrowth from initial to mature condition by forest succession processes [22].The opposite way, from mature to initial forest stages, also occurs due to forest disturbances in a direct (i.e., clear cut, selective logging) or indirect way (i.e., edge effect in fragmented landscapes) [23][24][25].The progress and regress of forest succession result in continuous modifications in species composition and biophysical features.Successively, there is a replacement of species, local environmental changes, and tree growth or increased mortality.Thereby, many studies investigate how fast the velocity of the forest regeneration is [22], how invasive species change the regrowth tendency [26], what the main environmental features determining the direction of the forest succession are [13], or what the level of the carbon storage in different forest stages is [27].
Historically, these questions have been addressed by ground-based surveys, which are frequently sparsely sampled, inventoried at a small scale, and time consuming [28].Remote sensing technology adds new possibilities for analysis, allowing obtaining data from inaccessible areas using satellite images, which can reduce biases caused by nonrandom plot locations.Satellite images have been largely used to map forest recovery by forest/nonforest maps or successional stand classifications (initial, advanced stages).However, biomass maps obtained from RS data can be used to identify forest succession patterns because AGB integrates important forest structure information associated with forest regrowth or disturbances, such as tree height, diameter, number of trees by area, and wood density (Figure 4), which can be measured and validated in the field.

Dynamics of AGB during Forest Regrowth from Field and RS Measurements.
In tropical forests, young fallows show biomass increases ranging from 1 to 15 Mg ha −1 yr −1 after short-term shifting cultivation [10,27,29,30].A mean biomass increment of 5.3 Mg ha −1 yr −1 has been documented in Atlantic rainforest over a 22-year study of undisturbed forest plots [31].Thus, secondary forests can rapidly grow up to 100 Mg ha −1 of AGB or less than 20 Mg ha −1 within 20 years after land abandonment.The rate of regrowth depends on the availability of seed propagules, vegetation type, environmental conditions, site productivity, intensity of the past land use, and/or human intervention [32].In tropical forest regrowth, leaf AGB tends to increase for 20 years and wood AGB increases for 40 years before stabilizing [10].These time periods seem short when compared to some modeling estimations and field observations that have indicated that the tropical forest needs approximately 80-160 years to reach the mature stage (90% of similar species) [33], although Liebsch et al. [34] found an increase of approximately 57% in species richness over 25 years of forest regrowth in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest.During regrowth, the species richness and the abundance of fauna also increase rapidly and can recover in the first 10-20 years for animals that are not dependent on late-stage plant species [35].
The challenge is to obtain reliable estimates of AGB associated with regrowth using temporal remotely sensed data.Although landscape scale land cover dynamics have been accurately assessed through RS using classification schemes, such as forest/nonforest (e.g., [36]), the study of forest regrowth using continuous variables, such as AGB, can provide new perspectives on regeneration patterns.The ability to track AGB through time enables the assessments of the directional changes in forest dynamics [16].Although limitations to RS estimation of temporal variation in AGB exist, such as those found by [37] who showed that they overestimated forest regrowth rates as a result of forest fires and a severe El Niño drought before the image dates and uncorrected atmospheric effects; a growing number of studies are developing and implementing methodological techniques to minimize such uncertainties [38][39][40][41].
The spatial and temporal evaluation of forest regrowth patterns is also an important issue.Areas belonging to the same region may show different forest area increase as a consequence of differences in human demography and industrialization [42,43].Moreover, the losses (by degradation) and accumulations (by forests regrowth) of biomass may change without a change in forest area [44].The structure and change dynamics of an old-growth tropical forest was studied by Kellner et al. [38].In 8.5 years, the authors found an equal number of positive and negative transitions of mean canopy height estimated by using LiDAR data, indicating steadystate dynamics of disturbance and regeneration.Therefore, unknown tendencies in forest regrowth patterns associated with AGB changes can appear at different time and spatial ranges of analysis.
Forest regrowth has also been identified in remote sensing studies by using forest age [30,45] or successional stand classes [46,47]

Number of documents
The Netherlands The United States and geographic features or land-use history [11].In addition, forest age or successional stand information is not always available for some forest areas [45].The authors explained that the AGB differences are related to the higher levels of collateral damage caused during high-lead harvesting.In other cases, logged areas exhibited lower mean maximum crown size diameters than old-growth forests [28].Aerial photographs revealed that tree height/diameter allometric relationships exhibit regression slope differences between logged and old-growth forests [50].

Natural and Anthropogenic
The impacts of tree species invasion on forest structures and AGB are also well studied and particularly in Hawaii, USA.Invasive tree species can rapidly spread through seeds or vegetative propagation and show opportunistic behaviours [51].This is expected to lead to changes in overall forest AGBs.Asner et al. [26] used airborne LiDAR data to quantify forest structure and found that invasion by the tree Morella faya altered the three-dimensional structure of the rainforests, including the mean tree height, but not the total amount of AGB at the landscape level.The proliferation of tree species, Psidium cattleianum and Ficus rubiginosa, however, corresponded to decreases of 19-38% in tropical forest AGB [13].

Forest Responses to Environmental Conditions.
Environmental conditions and resource availability can also affect primary net production [52] and, consequently, AGB changes throughout forest succession.Differences in the spatial and temporal distributions of precipitation across bioclimatic zones constrain forest AGB in some locations and were found to be an important ecological issue discussed in the reviewed literature.The increase in the number of dry months produced a reduction in forest AGB, showing the influence of net water deficits in the forest structure at regional [53] to continental scales [12].In a study by Asner et al. [13], using airborne LiDAR data, biomass declined 53-84% in areas with increasing elevation, due to changes in temperature and humidity.On the contrary, Alves et al. [54] found AGB increment with elevation increase in the Brazilian Atlantic coast.All these examples demonstrate how environmental conditions can modulate spatial and temporal patterns of forest AGB.
Another common theme in the literature focuses on spatial distribution of biomass as related to differences among forest types.Biomes or vegetation physiognomies are closely related to environmental and climatic conditions.Wang and Qi [18] reported RS AGB differences between dry dipterocarp forests, mixed deciduous forests, and tropical evergreen forests.These results illustrate the potential use of RS AGB data to distinguish between vegetation types.However, Saatchi et al. [12] found that RS AGB data from Amazon forest was not a useful tool for distinguishing between vegetation types due to the low correlation between forest biomass and vegetation types in this biome.Asner et al. [55] integrated airborne LiDAR with maps of ecosystem types and found significant differences related to forest types and geologic substrate, allowing them to scale up the detailed LiDAR measurements to a large portion of the Southern Peruvian Amazon.Vieira et al. [11] and Saatchi et al. [12], however, found that AGB variations in tropical forests were more due to differences in soil type and land-use history than forest types.Thereby, the relationship between estimated AGB and forest succession patterns needs to be interpreted considering specific characteristics of forest types and the influence of environmental conditions among different scales of analyses.

Carbon Source, Sink, and Storage.
The spatial and temporal change of AGB during the forest succession is controlled by a conjunct of environmental, biological, and human factors, as seen until now.The observed forest AGB can be directly related to tree carbon storage.Dry biomass is expected to contain approximately 50% carbon [8,56].The relationship between AGB and carbon opens up a wide range of integrated discussions of the use of forest biomass for carbon monitoring [57,58].Brazil, the Democratic Republic of Congo, and Indonesia have the highest carbon stocks and the largest tropical forest areas, indicating that great effort should be expended in the further verification and monitoring of data in these countries [59,60].
The effect of the increase in atmospheric carbon concentration on climate change is the flagship topic for the study and implementation of environmental carbon sinks as a result of the forest succession.The concept of carbon sinks has been criticized because of estimation biases and the difficulties associated with their quantification and verification using the available technology [61].The difficulty in measuring changes in biomass and the lack of spatially explicit data are the main cause of variation among carbon estimates at the same area [44].To overcome these limitations, Hall et al. [19] proposed a new orbital mission capable of estimating forest carbon storage around the world (see Section 4.1.1 for details).[62].Structural attributes and microclimatic conditions change during the forest regrowth process, which can determine habitat suitability for some species [35].A good relation of habitat heterogeneity and species diversity depends on the taxonomic group under study, how the animal guild studied perceives the vegetation structure, and the spatial resolution of the observation [63].Biophysical forest characteristics obtained through RS data can generate continuum models related to ecological gradients and can be used to produce habitat suitability models [64].

Habitat Suitability. Forest structural complexity can affect animal species distributions and abundance patterns
Gradual changes in RS AGB and forest structure through space and time assessed by optical, radar, or LiDAR data have also been used to investigate the relationship between habitat heterogeneity and species diversity.Kalacska et al. [15] obtained a suitable RS model to estimate Shannon index in a tropical forest.However, the authors noted that remotely sensed data focusing on the canopy surface (i.e., surface reflection measured by Hyperion) might be inappropriate for assessing relationships between subcanopy elements, such as understory species richness.Even though the relationship between species diversity and habitat suitability has been widely documented in field-based research, the empirical knowledge of this relation may be seriously affected by the lack of information over a broad range of environmental conditions [63].Such problems demonstrate the necessity of large-scale studies related to habitat suitability and the need to understand how RS data interact with field-based variables.

Biophysical Measurement and Modeling
Successful estimation and modeling of AGB over large scales require (a) correct selection and application of remote sensing, (b) being coupled with field data for calibration and validation, and being integrated into (c) an appropriate modeling approach (Figure 5).In this review, we focus on the information required to determine forest successional processes and spatial distribution.

Data Sources
4.1.1.Remote Sensing.Selection of an appropriate source of data requires first the identification of the ecological question being asked and identification of the limitations and advantages of each sensor.Overall, the combination or fusion of optical and radar data has the potential to achieve the highest accuracies in the estimated AGB [65,66].Optical data can be used to improve the accuracy of radar data [12], for example, by removing leaf backscatter and compensating leaf attenuation to woody structures in each pixel [18].Radar data (e.g., JERS-1 images) may be especially helpful as the microwaves are independent of cloud cover, a frequent problem in tropical forests.Although the trunk and branch biomass estimations coming from radar are better than the optical data estimations, the response cannot be always the same in terrains with steeper slopes [20].
Other data sources used in the studies evaluated include the Hyperion satellite sensor and aircraft based HYDICE sensor, with high spectral (220 and 210 narrow bands, resp.) and radiometric resolutions.Whereas Landsat has 8-bit resolution with 256 information levels, Hyperion data has 16 bits with 65,536 information levels ranging from data range ∼0.4 to 2.5 m [67].The greater spectral resolution provided by Hyperion can result in improved sensor capabilities allowing measurements of smaller variations in reflected energy [68,69], which can be related to forest biomass or phytochemical characteristics of the canopy.The capacity of hyperspectral sensors to differentiate tree phytochemical features enables more detailed estimates of forest structural data in the forest succession studies, partly related to improved mapping of canopy chemistry related to the tree species composition.Some research initiatives have achieved successful measurements of forest structure and species composition by merging LiDAR (tree height) and hyperspectral (phytochemical) data [70,71], which is an important ongoing focus for studies on the direction and rate of the forest succession.
LiDAR systems can be used to obtain both top of canopy and within canopy structural information as some systems can have effective signal penetration through the forest canopy, resulting in 3D vegetation structure data [53,72] with spatial resolution varying according to the system design and flight altitude above the study area.LiDAR is now considered to be the state of the art for remote sensing based biomass estimation but has significant disadvantages related to the high cost per area, lack of historical data for temporal analysis, and the unavailability of large-scale datasets making regional or global AGB estimation with airborne LiDAR unfeasible [59,73].To mitigate this problem, there is a need for a satellite based platform providing global LiDAR data optimized for AGB estimation with errors less than 10 to 25 Mg C ha −1 [19].
The sensors used in the reviewed studies mainly differed in cost and temporal, spatial, spectral, and radiometric resolutions (Table 2).The widespread use of Landsat TM data may be attributed to the low cost of this data.Despite this, the main limitation of the Landsat images is the reflectance saturation at higher biomass values [20].However, the longer time span of available information (since 1984) is an advantage of Landsat data that can play an important role in temporal forest regrowth analyses.
Multitemporal imagery can be an important source of data for the study of forest regrowth patterns, but the data processing should account for atmospheric corrections and phenological effects.Atmospheric conditions can influence optical RS data through two processes: the absorption and the scatter of solar radiance [74].The main problem is that images from different dates were acquired under different atmospheric conditions, and preprocessing analyses need to accurately correct for these differences [75].The comparison of multiple images from different months to monitor successional changes also needs to consider signal effect resulting from phenological variations in the canopy.Seasonal changes in solar zenith angle, variations in the amount of leaves in the canopy, and the growth of understory vegetation are the main features that can confound remotely sensed signals [76].

Ground Truthing.
The reviewed studies obtained ground truthing field data from plots or through the point quadrant method.The total sampled area ranged from 1.5 to 272 ha, but in 70% of the studies the area ranged from 1 ha to 9.5 ha.Access difficulties may create restrictions to the sampling of larger areas.Studies with small sampling areas tended to overestimate AGB per hectare, but this tendency is not always significant [77].Even so, ground truthing of only small areas may result in site-specific models and limit the transferability of the model to other areas [17].To minimize this condition some studies have used large field databases merging data from different regions [12,73,78].
The suitability of the method depends on the scale of the study area and the structural heterogeneity of the forest [79,80].The greater the sampling spatial scale, the greater the probability of having good representation of forest structural heterogeneity in the region, indicating that a broad sample area may be required.Moreover, there is a need for a minimum knowledge about the spatial distribution of the forest structure studied [81] and the local influence of the topography and soil on the AGB.Tropical trees tend to exhibit an aggregation pattern [82] and high variability within short spatial distances in forest structure and biomass [83], resulting in a complex mosaic that can be difficult to fully sample.The use of plots greater than 0.1 ha has been shown to be more reliable than smaller plots, which is also related to decreased stochastic small-scale disturbances having disproportionate weighting on total measured structure and AGB [83], maintain greater spatial overlap between ground-reference and sensor data, capture greater forest variability, and reduce edge noise from neighbouring trees [84].The use of the point quadrant method has the advantage of evaluating forest heterogeneity at less effort and lower cost than plot-based sampling, but this method can underestimate densities and basal areas [85].The studies that used point quadrant methods also showed high correlation values between field and RS data [18,86].Nevertheless, the use of this method needs to be better evaluated as a ground truthing option because such a method has the potential to be used in large-scale studies with reduced fieldwork [87].Furthermore, a hierarchical sampling scheme of plots, quadrants, and subquadrants can be a good way to include this complexity [88].Data from the smallest scale (subquadrant) can be treated as random draws from an unobserved quadrant and modeled to obtain uncertainty parameters for the regression of quadrant and satellite data [89].

Allometric Equations to Estimate Forest Biomass.
The studies reviewed used between 1 and 16 different allometric equations per study to estimate AGB.Different allometric relations between biomass and tree diameter or height are set by environmental (e.g., ground slope, climatic conditions, and light level) or biological factors [90] and can explain up to 90-95% of the ground AGB [11,91].Testing allometric model accuracies, Vieira et al. [92] applied several allometric equations (developed by different authors) to the same diameter at breast height (DBH) and height and found a difference of 5-7% in AGB estimations, indicating a source of error dependent upon the equation choice.Another source of error in the forest AGB estimation may be the lack of information from nonarboreal sources (such as lianas, palms, tree ferns, bamboo, and epiphytes), which can account for more than 10% of the AGB in Atlantic Forest areas [92].
The choice of the equation used to estimate AGB may depend on the height and DBH range and on the species composition of the forest studied.Attention to these factors may improve the suitability of the biomass estimation using allometric equations [88,93].Another option would be to include wood density in the biomass estimation, providing a more accurate representation of tree biomass than those relying only on DBH and height [94].When species-level data are not available, a mean wood density by forest type, family, or genus can be used [53].

Remotely Sensed Biomass Estimation by Model Inversion.
The main statistical tool used in the studies to relate field and RS data was parametric statistic (90% of the studies).This statistic approach uses continuous biomass data as dependent variable and RS data as independent variable.Modeled biomass values from tropical forests can display nonlinear trends in the residuals, indicating the use of nonlinear models [45].Li et al. [88] obtained better adjusted squared and mean squared error values using nonlinear models than linear models and presented a clear framework to develop a nonlinear biomass model for tropical forests.However, about 50% of the studies used linear regression (simple or multiple).Therefore, the choice between linear or nonlinear approaches depends on their statistical requirements.In both cases, linear or nonlinear equations, the resulted equations are frequently used to predict biomass data in areas not surveyed with field work.Generalized linear models (GLM) have also been used to analyze the suitability of AGB models using Akaike Information Criterion and -squared values to evaluate model performances [87,95].GLM models allow us to explore combinations of factors, covariates, and interactions among variables through a process called iteratively reweighted least squares.This overcomes the basic problem related to regression models that is the change in the variance as a consequence of the transformation of the data to attain normality [96].
Finally, other predictive models used in the reviewed studies were decision tree and neural networks.Decision trees use hierarchical set of rules to define classes and it does not assume any a priori statistical characteristics for the input data layers [12].The use of neural networks is an alternative that can play a significant role in obtaining better accuracy [97].However, neural network models have a substantial subjective component and can be relatively poor for semantically related field and remotely sensed data [98].

Uncertainty.
In the modeling context, uncertainty is the lack of knowledge of the true values of a variable, which can be estimated by the range and likelihood of possible values [57].The overall uncertainty in AGB estimation using RS is directly related to the relationship between a set of potential errors coming from processing satellite data (Section 4.1.1),field data (Section 4.1.2),statistical modeling (Section 4.2), and the ecological variables studied.Beyond the uncertainty from each variable, the errors can come from the interaction among them, for example, in the conflict of scale between satellite and field data samples.The challenge is to balance how the errors influence the ecological data interpretation and how the errors from each modeling step influence the overall error.
Most studies considered were mainly performed in flat forest areas.In optical images, ground slope can shade areas, resulting in decreased reflectance values compared to flat areas [99] and the generation of spectral differences between forests at the same successional stage [76].These topographic effects can be minimized by different algorithmic corrections [100], but biases may still be included in analyses [87].
The position errors of the sensor data can also reduce the modeling accuracy in pixel-based modeling [76].Two common strategies were used to minimize this problem: the correlation of the field data with a 3 × 3 or 5 × 5 pixel window around the ground data [15,98,101] and the use of a mean radiance from a forest patch [18,49].These approaches can also reduce the confidence level of the model due to the high area disproportion between the field area plot (i.e., 0.09 ha) and the pixel window from, for example, the Landsat data (2.25 ha in a 5 × 5 window).
The root mean square error (RMSE) and determination coefficient values were widely used to compare the accuracies of the AGB estimates.The error estimate had a mean value of 41.2 Mg ha −1 (SD = 29.3Mg ha −1 ), considering the reviewed studies that present this analysis in the results (17 studies from the 46 analyzed).Commonly, the RMSE is obtained from the comparison of model predictions with independent data.Data can be randomly separated in two groups, one to implement the model and one to check its performance.This process can be repeated many times to obtain randomized RMSE values.Finally, all values are used to build up the overall error probability density function, which can be used to evaluate the magnitude and trend direction of the errors [57].
Li et al. [88] found that the AGB model might show inflated residual variances toward higher biomass values.The authors noted that this can be associated with the application of the same allometric equation to trees with different sizes and forest with different structure complexities.Errors in forest AGB estimation can be random or systematic [83].Minor AGB errors have been found in forests with low biomass [12,53,102].
Despite these inherent modeling errors, biomass estimation using exclusively field data is far from being easy and is free of errors [17].Studies based only on field information are accurate at the local scale but may fail to take into account the large spatial variability of biomass.AGB estimations using only field data over large areas showed an overall sampling error of approximately ±20% [54,103].Moreover, field-based measurements and estimates are time consuming, labor intensive, and difficult to implement in remote areas [20].Challenges exist in the collection of both RS and field data.However, the integration of these different sources of information is crucial to better AGB estimates in any sites.

Synthesis and Future Research
In this review we highlight the advantages and disadvantages of estimating forest biomass from remote sensing.Remote sensing of aboveground biomass is critical to understand forest succession and landscape dynamics.Forest biomass relates to unique regrowth patterns, including rates and directions, which are partly determined by natural and anthropogenic disturbances.As species composition changes occur simultaneously to changes in forest structure and related aboveground biomass, study approaches limited to forest structure may have high errors in correctly identifying forest successional stages.This problem may be alleviated through fusion of sensors capable of deriving detailed structural (e.g., radar and LiDAR) and phytochemical (e.g., hyperspectral images) features of the forest canopy.
Access to historical ground truthing information remains one of the main difficulties in multitemporal comparisons of AGB.Most of the selected studies indicated forest regrowth as a potential subject to be analyzed by AGB estimation but do not address the topic.Further interpretation of tropical forest ecological processes, as can be derived from remotely sensed forest structure, is required [13].Nevertheless, the potential for the use of remotely sensed biomass estimations in forest succession studies in tropical forests remains high.More detailed analyses on the spatial distribution of AGB are merited for improved forest management, conservation status evaluation, carbon source and sink investigations, and better understanding implications of environmental conditions, including climatic change, on forest structure and composition.
Our review indicates that accuracy and precision assessment are the most important challenges related.The uncertainty estimates need to be robust and transparent, due to the current importance for decision makers [58].In addition, the evaluation of the studies reviewed here indicates that errors in AGB estimations can in some cases be the same as annual AGB changes by regrowth process, making AGB comparisons on a short time scale unfeasible using imprecise or biased data.However, long time scale lag comparisons are still possible if attention is paid to spectral variations between satellite images related to atmospheric conditions and satellite signal degradation over time.Hall et al. [19] highlighted the importance of a new space mission with a technology able to obtain biophysical forest estimates with lower errors in short time scale comparisons.
A reliable AGB estimation depends on the sensor type, processing strategy and forest characteristics.In focusing attention only on the RS data process, we may fail to identify critical ecological patterns.Our results suggest that sampling choices depend on intrinsic forest features and sources of noise related, for example, to topographic characteristics.In addition, we discussed some positive and negative features of each sensor for obtaining AGB estimations.The choice of data source depends on trade-offs between advantages and disadvantages of methodological and technological features.
When making a modeling choice, attention must be paid to potential sources of bias in the biomass regression models, including (a) sample size, (b) accuracy of the allometric equations, (c) image calibration, (d) the methodology used for temporal adjustments between the sampled biomass data and satellite observations, (e) the multicollinearity of the polynomial model [88], (f) the fact that 30-50% of the forest biomass is hidden by emergent trees [94], (g) the increased number of lianas in the intermediate successional stage [15], (h) topography, and (i) the past land-use context in the study of forest regrowth dynamics.

Figure 1 :
Figure 1: Number of articles published over the last 29 years.

Figure 2 :Figure 3 :
Figure 2: Number of articles published by author's countries.The countries included in the figure have more than two publications, considering our search criteria.

Figure 5 :
Figure 5: Source of variability and challenges related to each stage of aboveground biomass estimation and modelling.
[132]te, soil, and human activities determine the forest stand structure and the forest regrowth pattern.The estimated aboveground biomass (AGB) may be used as a variable to answer ecological issues, such as forest responses to environmental conditions, habitat suitability, carbon storage, and conservation in managed areas (adapted from Sarker et al.[132]).
[49]urbance Impacts on Forest AGB.Changes in the natural course of forest succession may occur due to a large number of disturbances, including wild and intentional fires, selective logging, climate change, and/or the introduction of invasive species.Forest responses Some of the reviewed studies evaluated spatial and temporal changes of tree biomass in logged forests under different management techniques.Tangki and Chappell[49]demonstrated that high-lead harvesting techniques resulted in smaller remaining tree biomasses than logging using tractor skidders.

Table 2 :
Remote sensing data used in the studies reviewed.