International Journal of Hypertension

Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 513047, 6 pages

http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/513047

Review Article

AT2 Receptor-Interacting Proteins ATIPs in the Brain

Sylvie Rodrigues-Ferreira,1,2,3 Erwann le Rouzic,1,2,3,4 Traci Pawlowski,5,6 Anand Srivastava,⁵ Florence Margottin-Goguet,1,2,3 and Clara Nahmias1,2,3

¹Inserm U1016, Paris 75014, France

²CNRS UMR 8104, Paris 75014, France

³Institut Cochin, Université Paris Descartes, 22 Rue Méchain, 75014 Paris, France

⁴MUTABILIS S.A., 93230 Romainville, France

⁵J.C. Self Research Institute of Human Genetics, Greenwood Genetic Center, Greenwood, SC 29646, USA

⁶Caris Life Sciences, Phoenix, AZ 85040, USA

Received 29 November 2012; Accepted 22 December 2012

Academic Editor: Patrick Vanderheyden

Copyright © 2013 Sylvie Rodrigues-Ferreira et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

A complete renin-angiotensin system (RAS) is locally expressed in the brain and fulfills important functions. Angiotensin II, the major biologically active peptide of the RAS, acts via binding to two main receptor subtypes designated AT1 and AT2. The present paper focuses on AT2 receptors, which have been reported to have neuroprotective effects on stroke, degenerative diseases, and cognitive functions. Our group has identified a family of AT2 receptor interacting proteins (ATIPs) comprising three major members (ATIP1, ATIP3, and ATIP4) with different intracellular localization. Of interest, all ATIP members are expressed in brain tissues and carry a conserved domain able to interact with the AT2 receptor intracellular tail, suggesting a role in AT2-mediated brain functions. We summarize here current knowledge on the ATIP family of proteins, and we present new experimental evidence showing interaction defects between ATIP1 and two mutant forms of the AT2 receptor identified in cases of mental retardation. These studies point to a functional role of the AT2/ATIP1 axis in cognition.

1. Introduction

The renin-angiotensin system (RAS), a major regulator of blood pressure and cardiovascular functions, is now fully recognized as playing important roles in the brain [1–6]. Among the active peptides generated by the RAS, angiotensin II (AngII) stands as the best characterized. This octapeptide binds to two receptor subtypes, namely, AT1 and AT2, that belong to the superfamily of seven transmembrane domains receptors. In most tissues and cell lines, AT1 appears as a driving receptor that mediates most effects of AngII by activating classical heterotrimeric G proteins and intracellular signaling cascades [6, 7]. In contrast, AT2 is generally considered as an AT1-counteracting receptor that involves nonclassical signaling pathways and does not necessarily require exposure to AngII [6, 8]. Over the past few years, several AT2 receptor interacting partners have been identified [8–12], among which SHP-1 [8, 9], PLZF [13], and ATIP1/ATBP50 [12, 14, 15] that regulate AT2 receptor trafficking, internalization and/or activation. In this paper, we will focus on the family of ATIP proteins and their potential roles in AT2-mediated brain functions.

2. AT2 Receptor in the Brain

In contrast to the ubiquitous AT1 receptor, the AT2 subtype is predominantly expressed during embryonic development and is restricted to few sites in the adult [8, 17, 18]. In the central nervous system, AT2 expression is high during fetal life and remains elevated in the adult in specific areas involved in cognition, behavior, and locomotion [1, 18–20]. AT2 is mainly expressed in neurons and mediates neuronal differentiation [21–27], survival [28–30] and regeneration [31–33] through the regulation of protein kinases and phosphatases [8, 34–38], and the reorganization of the cytoskeleton [39, 40]. Functional in vivo studies tend to indicate protective effects of the AT2 receptor against stroke, Alzheimer disease, and cognitive impairment [26, 33, 41–45]. Involvement of AT2 receptors in cognition has also been suggested by the identification of mutations in the corresponding AGTR2 gene in several cases of mental retardation [46–48]. However these results remain a matter of debate [49–52], and functional alterations of AT2 receptors in mental retardation have still to be demonstrated. Further analyses of AT2 signaling pathways and AT2 interacting partners in the brain [53] following or not receptor activation with compound 21 (M024), a new selective AT2 ligand [54–56], should bring further insights on the effects of AT2 receptors in normal and pathological situations.

3. A Family of AT2 Receptor-Interacting Proteins (ATIP)

A family of AT2 receptor-interacting proteins (ATIPs) has been identified by a two-hybrid system cloning strategy using as a bait the 52 carboxy-terminal residues of the AT2 receptor [14, 15]. Three major human ATIP members (ATIP1, ATIP3, and ATIP4) are encoded by alternative exon splicing [16] and from alternative promoters [57] present on a single gene designated MTUS1. This gene contains 17 coding exons encompassing more than 112 kilobases and localizes at chromosomal position 8p22 [16]. All three ATIP transcripts use the same 3′ exons of the gene, and therefore encoded proteins are identical in their carboxy-terminal (395 amino acids) portion, which carries the AT2 receptor-interacting domain [12, 14, 16]. Thus, each ATIP member is in principle able to interact with AT2, although to date, only ATIP1 has been formally demonstrated to bind AT2 in living cells [14, 15, 34]. Expression of all three mRNA species has been detected in nonpathological human tissues by real-time PCR analysis using probes specific for each splice isoform [16] (Figure 1). ATIP1 and ATIP3 are ubiquitous whereas ATIP4 expression is restricted to the central nervous system. All ATIP transcripts were found expressed in every brain area examined [16], ATIP1 being predominant in all brain regions except cerebellum and fetal brain in which ATIP4 represents the major ATIP species.

(a)

(b)

Figure 1: Distribution profiles of ATIP transcripts in normal human tissues. (a) Real-time PCR using probes common to all ATIP transcripts (3′ exons). (b) Real-time PCR using probes specific for each ATIP transcript (5′ exons). Results presented are from Di Benedetto et al., 2006 [16], and are normalized relative to the levels of human acidic ribosomal phosphoprotein P0 (RPLP0). Sk. muscle: skeletal muscle.

4. The ATIP1/AT2 Axis in Neuronal Differentiation

ATIP1 (also designated MTSG1 and ATBP50 in the mouse) is the first characterized member of the ATIP protein family [14, 15, 58]. ATIP1 is a cytosolic protein that inhibits cell proliferation, receptor tyrosine kinase signaling, and ERK phosphorylation and contributes to the trafficking of the AT2 receptor from the Golgi to the cell membrane.

Real-time PCR analysis of ATIP transcripts in human tissues has revealed that ATIP1 is ubiquitous and the most abundant ATIP mRNA species expressed in the brain [16] (Figure 1). However, only few studies have investigated the effects of ATIP1 in brain functions. In rat fetal neurons, ATIP1 is constitutively associated with the AT2 receptor at the cell membrane and is part of a multimeric complex comprising the AT2 receptor and the SHP-1 tyrosine phosphatase [34]. Upon AT2 receptor activation by AngII, ATIP1 and SHP-1 remain associated but detach from the AT2 receptor and translocate from the cell membrane to the nucleus. In the nucleus, the ATIP1/SHP-1 complex activates the transcription of the methyl methanesulfonate sensitive 2 (MMS2) gene, thereby contributing to AT2-mediated neuronal differentiation [34]. These data suggest that detachment of ATIP1 from the AT2 receptor, rather than its association, may trigger activation of AT2 signaling pathways. Accordingly, dissociation of ATIP1/AT2 complexes following AngII stimulation has also been reported in transfected Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) cells [14].

5. ATIP1/AT2 Alterations in Mental Retardation

ATIP1 interacts with the C-terminal intracellular portion of the AT2 receptor [14, 15]. Interestingly, two nonconservative amino acid substitutions (R324Q and I337V) in the carboxy-terminal sequence of the human AT2 receptor have been identified in cases of mental retardation [46], prompting us to investigate whether these alterations may impact on the ability of the AT2 receptor to recruit ATIP1. We addressed this question using the two-hybrid system in yeast. The last 52 amino acids of the human AT2 receptor, either wild-type or mutated (R324Q or I337V), were PCR-amplified and subcloned into the pGBT9 vector in frame with the Gal4-DNA binding domain. The AT2-interacting domain of ATIP1 was subcloned into the VP16 vector. Interactions were assayed as previously described in the HF7 yeast strain which contains Histidine and beta-galactosidase reporter genes [14]. Interaction between the C-terminal domain of ATIP1 and the C-terminal region of the human AT2 receptor was confirmed (Figure 2). To our surprise, the interaction of ATIP1 with each of the mutated forms of the AT2 receptor was stronger compared to the interaction with wild-type AT2, suggesting that AT2 mutants may exhibit higher affinity for ATIP1. These data raise the interesting possibility that mutated AT2 receptors may retain ATIP1 at the cell membrane upon AngII stimulation. Further experiments are required to explore this hypothesis. We speculate that AT2 mutations (R324Q and I337V) identified in mental retardation may impair the intracellular activity of the receptor by preventing the release of ATIP1. These results suggest for the first time that dysfunctions in the AT2/ATIP1 axis may be involved in mental retardation. They point to a role for ATIP1 in brain functions and relaunch the debate on the functional involvement of AT2 receptors in mental retardation.

Figure 2: Interaction between ATIP1 and wild-type or mutated AT2 receptors. The C-terminus domain of ATIP1 (ATIP) interacts with the C-terminal region of human AT2 receptor, either wild-type (WT) or mutated (R324Q, I337V). The yeast reporter strain HF7 expressing the pairs of indicated hybrid proteins was analyzed for histidine auxotrophy and β-galactosidase expression as described [14]. Transformants were plated on medium with histidine (left), without histidine (His, middle), or replica-plated on Whatman filters and tested for β-galactosidase activity (βGal, right). Growth in the absence of histidine and blue color in the β-galactosidase assay indicate interaction between hybrid proteins (WT: wild-type sequence; Ctrl; empty vector).

6. Microtubule-Associated ATIP3

As mentioned before, ATIP3 is identical to ATIP1 in the carboxy-terminal region carrying the AT2-interacting domain; however whether this isoform indeed interacts with the AT2 receptor in living cells remains to be determined. QPCR analyses revealed that ATIP3 transcripts are expressed in all human tissues including in the central nervous system [16]. However, ATIP3 functions in the brain have not yet been investigated. Of interest, ATIP3 closely associates with microtubules (Figure 3) [12, 59, 60], suggesting possible roles of this protein in diverse biological functions associated with cytoskeleton remodeling. Indeed, ATIP3 localizes to the mitotic spindle during cell division and acts as a potent antimitotic protein that inhibits cancer cell proliferation in vitro and tumor growth in vivo, in line with tumor suppressor effects of ATIP3 reported in breast cancer [59].

Figure 3: Schematic representation of ATIPs localization and interaction with AT2 receptors. ATIP1 is constitutively associated with the AT2 receptor at the cell membrane in rat fetal neurons and dissociates from the receptor upon AngII stimulation [34]. Putative interactions of ATIP3 and ATIP4 with AT2 receptors through their respective carboxy-terminal regions are represented.

In the brain, microtubules play essential roles by regulating neuronal differentiation, neurite outgrowth, and cell migration [61, 62]. Alterations of microtubule-associated proteins such as tau are strongly associated with the occurrence of neurodegenerative pathologies, including Alzheimer disease [63, 64], in which AT2 receptors have also been implicated [43, 44, 65]. Whether microtubule-associated effects of ATIP3 may also contribute to the regulation of brain functions, in response or not to AT2 receptor stimulation, is a question that deserves further studies.

7. Brain-Specific Expression of ATIP4

The cDNA cloning and functional characterization of the ATIP4 isoform have not been undertaken to date. ATIP4 presents two interesting features that make it a good candidate for mediating AT2 functions in the brain. First, expression of the ATIP4 mRNA is restricted to the brain and remains undetectable in peripheral tissues [16] (Figure 1). Of note, ATIP4 mRNA levels are highest in the fetal brain and in the cerebellum, which are two regions of abundant AT2 receptor expression in human brain [20]. Second, the amino acid sequence of ATIP4 contains a stretch of 24 hydrophobic residues flanked by charged residues, which is the hallmark of intrinsic membrane-spanning domains. Based on these in silico observations, it is tempting to speculate that ATIP4 might be structurally organized as a transmembrane protein with a short (36 residues) N-terminal extracellular domain and an intracellular region (456 residues) able to interact with the AT2 receptor (Figure 3). Future studies should be designed to investigate whether ATIP4 and AT2 are indeed colocalized at the plasma membrane in neuronal cells, and whether they functionally interact to regulate important brain functions. Prominent ATIP4 expression in the cerebellum compared to other regions of the brain (Figure 1) may suggest involvement of this ATIP isoform in functions related to locomotion, behavior, and/or cognition.

8. Concluding Remarks

Since the discovery of a new family of AT2 receptor interacting proteins in 2004, the question of whether these polypeptides may play a role in normal and/or pathological brain functions has not been addressed. Notably, all ATIP members are abundantly expressed in the brain and share the same C-terminal domain able to interact with the AT2 receptor, suggesting that each ATIP member may contribute to brain AT2 receptor functions. A functional AT2/ATIP1 axis has been previously reported to be involved in rat fetal neuron differentiation. We present here evidence that AT2/ATIP1 interactions are altered by AGTR2 mutations identified in cases of mental retardation. These data relaunch the debate on the implication of AT2 receptors in mental retardation and point to MTUS1 as an attractive target gene in human brain pathologies.

Conflict of Interests

The authors have no conflict of interests to declare.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the University Paris Descartes, Inserm, CNRS, Roche laboratories, the foundation RAJA-Danièle-Marcovici, the association Odyssea, and the association Prolific.

References

C. Llorens-Cortes and F. A. Mendelsohn, “Organisation and functional role of the brain angiotensin system,” Journal of the Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System, vol. 3, supplement 1, pp. S39–S48, 2002.

M. I. Phillips and E. M. De Oliveira, “Brain renin angiotensin in disease,” Journal of Molecular Medicine, vol. 86, no. 6, pp. 715–722, 2008.

A. E. Cuadra, Z. Shan, C. Sumners, and M. K. Raizada, “A current view of brain renin-angiotensin system: is the (pro)renin receptor the missing link?” Pharmacology and Therapeutics, vol. 125, no. 1, pp. 27–38, 2010.

A. G. Dupont and S. Brouwers, “Brain angiotensin peptides regulate sympathetic tone and blood pressure,” Journal of Hypertension, vol. 28, no. 8, pp. 1599–1610, 2010.

J. W. Wright and J. W. Harding, “Brain renin-angiotensin-A new look at an old system,” Progress in Neurobiology, vol. 95, no. 1, pp. 49–67, 2011.

M. Horiuchi, J. Iwanami, and M. Mogi, “Regulation of angiotensin II receptors beyond the classical pathway,” Clinical Science, vol. 123, no. 4, pp. 193–203, 2012.

S. Higuchi, H. Ohtsu, H. Suzuki, H. Shirai, G. D. Frank, and S. Eguchi, “Angiotensin II signal transduction through the AT1 receptor: novel insights into mechanisms and pathophysiology,” Clinical Science, vol. 112, no. 7-8, pp. 417–428, 2007.

S. Nouet and C. Nahmias, “Signal transduction from the angiotensin II AT2 receptor,” Trends in Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–6, 2000.

M. Mogi, M. Iwai, and M. Horiuchi, “Emerging concepts of regulation of angiotensin II receptors: new players and targets for traditional receptors,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 27, no. 12, pp. 2532–2539, 2007.

E. R. Porrello, L. M. Delbridge, and W. G. Thomas, “The angiotensin II type 2 (AT2) receptor: an enigmatic seven transmembrane receptor,” Frontiers in Bioscience, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 958–972, 2009.

M. Mogi, M. Iwai, and M. Horiuchi, “New insights into the regulation of angiotensin receptors,” Current Opinion in Nephrology and Hypertension, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 138–143, 2009.

S. Rodrigues-Ferreira and C. Nahmias, “An ATIPical family of angiotensin II AT2 receptor-interacting proteins,” Trends in Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 21, no. 11, pp. 684–690, 2010.

T. Senbonmatsu, T. Saito, E. J. Landon et al., “A novel angiotensin II type 2 receptor signaling pathway: possible role in cardiac hypertrophy,” EMBO Journal, vol. 22, no. 24, pp. 6471–6482, 2003.

S. Nouet, N. Amzallag, J. M. Li et al., “Trans-inactivation of receptor tyrosine kinases by novel angiotensin II AT2 receptor-interacting protein, ATIP,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 279, no. 28, pp. 28989–28997, 2004.

C. J. Wruck, H. Funke-Kaiser, T. Pufe et al., “Regulation of transport of the angiotensin AT2 receptor by a novel membrane-associated Golgi protein,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 57–64, 2005.

M. Di Benedetto, I. Bièche, F. Deshayes et al., “Structural organization and expression of human MTUS1, a candidate 8p22 tumor suppressor gene encoding a family of angiotensin II AT2 receptor-interacting proteins, ATIP,” Gene, vol. 380, no. 2, pp. 127–136, 2006.

S. Shanmugam and K. Sandberg, “Ontogeny of angiotensin II receptors,” Cell Biology International, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 169–176, 1996.

A. M. Nuyt, Z. Lenkei, M. Palkovits, P. Corvol, and C. Llorens-Cortes, “Ontogeny of angiotensin II type 2 receptor mRNA expression in fetal and neonatal rat brain,” Journal of Comparative Neurology, vol. 407, no. 2, pp. 193–206, 1999.

Z. Lenkei, M. Palkovits, P. Corvol, and C. Llorens-Cortès, “Expression of angiotensin type-1 (AT1) and type-2 (AT2) receptor mRNAs in the adult rat brain: a functional neuroanatomical review,” Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 383–439, 1997.

A. M. Allen, D. P. MacGregor, M. J. McKinley, and F. A. Mendelsohn, “Angiotensin II receptors in the human brain,” Regulatory Peptides, vol. 79, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 1999.

S. Meffert, M. Stoll, U. M. Steckelings, S. P. Bottari, and T. Unger, “The angiotensin II AT2 receptor inhibits proliferation and promotes differentiation in PC12W cells,” Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology, vol. 122, no. 1, pp. 59–67, 1996.

L. Laflamme, M. De Gasparo, J. M. Gallo, M. D. Payet, and N. Gallo-Payet, “Angiotensin II induction of neurite outgrowth by AT2 receptors in NG108-15 cells. Effect counteracted by the AT1 receptors,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 271, no. 37, pp. 22729–22735, 1996.

F. Côté, T. H. Do, L. Laflamme, J. M. Gallo, and N. Gallo-Payet, “Activation of the AT2 receptor of angiotensin II induces neurite outgrowth and cell migration in microexplant cultures of the cerebellum,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 274, no. 44, pp. 31686–31692, 1999.

L. Gendron, M. D. Payet, and N. Gallo-Payet, “The angiotensin type 2 receptor of angiotensin II and neuronal differentiation: from observations to mechanisms,” Journal of Molecular Endocrinology, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 359–372, 2003.

M. O. Guimond, C. Wallinder, M. Alterman, A. Hallberg, and N. Gallo-Payet, “Comparative functional properties of two structurally similar selective nonpeptide drug-like ligands for the angiotensin II type-2 (AT(2)) receptor. Effects on neurite outgrowth in NG108-15 cells,” European Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 699, no. 1–3, pp. 160–171, 2012.

B. Maul, O. von Bohlen und Halbach, A. Becker et al., “Impaired spatial memory and altered dendritic spine morphology in angiotensin II type 2 receptor-deficient mice,” Journal of Molecular Medicine, vol. 86, no. 5, pp. 563–571, 2008.

U. M. Steckelings, F. Rompe, E. Kaschina et al., “The past, present and future of angiotensin II type 2 receptor stimulation,” Journal of the Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 67–73, 2010.

J. Li, J. Culman, H. Hörtnagl et al., “Angiotensin AT2 receptor protects against cerebral ischemia-induced neuronal injury,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 617–619, 2005.

N. Hobara, M. Goda, N. Yoshida et al., “Angiotensin II type 2 receptors facilitate reinnervation of phenol-lesioned vascular calcitonin gene-related peptide-containing nerves in rat mesenteric arteries,” Neuroscience, vol. 150, no. 3, pp. 730–741, 2007.

M. Horiuchi, M. Mogi, and M. Iwai, “The angiotensin II type 2 receptor in the brain,” Journal of the Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–6, 2010.

R. Lucius, S. Gallinat, P. Rosenstiel, T. Herdegen, J. Sievers, and T. Unger, “The angiotensin II type 2 (AT2) receptor promotes axonal regeneration in the optic nerve of adult rats,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 188, no. 4, pp. 661–670, 1998.

K. Reinecke, R. Lucius, A. Reinecke, U. Rickert, T. Herdegen, and T. Unger, “Angiotensin II accelerates functional recovery in the rat sciatic nerve in vivo: role of the AT2 receptor and the transcription factor NF-kappaB.,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 17, no. 14, pp. 2094–2096, 2003.

P. Namsolleck, F. Boato, K. Schwengel et al., “AT2-receptor stimulation enhances axonal plasticity after spinal cord injury by upregulating BDNF expression,” Neurobiology of Disease. In press

J. M. Li, M. Mogi, K. Tsukuda et al., “Angiotensin II-induced neural differentiation via angiotensin II type 2 (AT2) receptor-MMS2 cascade involving interaction between AT2 receptor-interacting protein and Src homology 2 domain-containing protein-tyrosine phosphatase 1,” Molecular Endocrinology, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 499–511, 2007.

B. Plouffe, M. O. Guimond, H. Beaudry, and N. Gallo-Payet, “Role of tyrosine kinase receptors in angiotensin II AT2 receptor signaling: involvement in neurite outgrowth and in p42/p44mapk activation in NG108-15 cells,” Endocrinology, vol. 147, no. 10, pp. 4646–4654, 2006.

M. O. Guimond, C. Roberge, and N. Gallo-Payet, “Fyn is involved in angiotensin II type 2 receptor-induced neurite outgrowth, but not in p42/p44mapk in NG108-15 cells,” Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 201–212, 2010.

K. Bedecs, N. Elbaz, M. Sutren et al., “Angiotensin II type 2 receptors mediate inhibition of mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade and functional activation of SHP-1 tyrosine phosphatase,” Biochemical Journal, vol. 325, no. 2, pp. 449–454, 1997.

N. Elbaz, K. Bedecs, M. Masson, M. Sutren, A. D. Strosberg, and C. Nahmias, “Functional trans-inactivation of insulin receptor kinase by growth-inhibitory angiotensin II AT2 receptor,” Molecular Endocrinology, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 795–804, 2000.

U. Stroth, S. Meffert, S. Gallinat, and T. Unger, “Angiotensin II and NGF differentially influence microtubule proteins in PC12W cells: role of the AT2 receptor,” Molecular Brain Research, vol. 53, no. 1-2, pp. 187–195, 1998.

P. Kilian, S. Campbell, L. Bilodeau et al., “Angiotensin II type 2 receptor stimulation increases the rate of NG108-15 cell migration via actin depolymerization,” Endocrinology, vol. 149, no. 6, pp. 2923–2933, 2008.

C. A. McCarthy, A. Vinh, J. K. Callaway, and R. E. Widdop, “Angiotensin AT2 receptor stimulation causes neuroprotection in a conscious rat model of stroke,” Stroke, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 1482–1489, 2009.

P. Gelosa, A. Pignieri, L. Fändriks et al., “Stimulation of AT2 receptor exerts beneficial effects in stroke-prone rats: focus on renal damage,” Journal of Hypertension, vol. 27, no. 12, pp. 2444–2451, 2009.

N. Gallo-Payet, M. O. Guimond, L. Bilodeau, C. Wallinder, M. Alterman, and A. Hallberg, “Angiotensin II, a neuropeptide at the frontier between endocrinology and neuroscience: is there a link between the angiotensin II Type 2 receptor and Alzheimer's disease?” Frontiers in Endocrinology, vol. 2, p. 17, 2011.

F. Jing, M. Mogi, A. Sakata et al., “Direct stimulation of angiotensin II type 2 receptor enhances spatial memory,” Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 248–255, 2012.

U. M. Steckelings, L. Paulis, P. Namsolleck, and T. Unger, “AT2 receptor agonists: hypertension and beyond,” Current Opinion in Nephrology & Hypertension, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 142–146, 2012.

V. S. Vervoort, M. A. Beachem, P. S. Edwards et al., “AGTR2 mutations in X-linked mental retardation,” Science, vol. 296, no. 5577, pp. 2401–2403, 2002.

T. Ylisaukko-oja, K. Rehnström, R. Vanhala, C. Tengström, J. Lähdetie, and I. Järvelä, “Identification of two AGTR2 mutations in male patients with non-syndromic mental retardation,” Human Genetics, vol. 114, no. 2, pp. 211–213, 2004.

E. Takeshita, E. Nakagawa, K. Nakatani, M. Sasaki, and Y. Goto, “Novel AGTR2 missense mutation in a Japanese boy with severe mental retardation, pervasive developmental disorder, and epilepsy,” Brain and Development, vol. 34, no. 9, pp. 776–779, 2012.

T. Bienvenu, K. Poirier, H. Van Esch et al., “Rare polymorphic variants of the AGTR2 gene in boys with non-specific mental retardation,” Journal of Medical Genetics, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 357–359, 2003.

J. Erdmann, S. Dähmlow, M. Guse et al., “The assertion that a G21V mutation in AGTR2 causes mental retardation is not supported by other studies (multiple letters),” Human Genetics, vol. 114, no. 4, pp. 396–397, 2004.

D. Huang, W. Sun, and C. M. Strom, “Sequence variations in AGTR2 are unlikely to be associated with x-linked mental retardation,” American Journal of Medical Genetics, vol. 139, no. 3, pp. 243–244, 2005.

V. S. Vervoort, G. Guzauskas, J. Archie, C. E. Schwartz, R. E. Stevenson, and A. K. Srivastava, “AGTR2 in brain development and function,” American Journal of Medical Genetics, vol. 140, no. 5, pp. 419–420, 2006.

K. Seidel, S. Kirsch, K. Lucht et al., “The promyelocytic leukemia zinc finger (PLZF) protein exerts neuroprotective effects in neuronal cells and is dysregulated in experimental stroke,” Brain Pathology, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 31–43, 2011.

Y. Wan, C. Wallinder, B. Plouffe et al., “Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation, of the first selective nonpeptide AT2 receptor agonist,” Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 47, no. 24, pp. 5995–6008, 2004.

J. Georgsson, C. Sköld, M. Botros et al., “Synthesis of a new class of druglike angiotensin II C-terminal mimics with affinity for the AT2 receptor,” Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 50, no. 7, pp. 1711–1715, 2007.

U. M. Steckelings, M. Larhed, A. Hallberg et al., “Non-peptide AT2-receptor agonists,” Current Opinion in Pharmacology, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 187–192, 2011.

J. Yu, X. Liu, H. Ye, and X. Zhou, “Genomic characterization of the human mitochondrial tumor suppressor gene 1 (MTUS1): 5' cloning and preliminary analysis of the multiple gene promoters,” BMC Research Notes, vol. 2, p. 109, 2009.

S. Seibold, C. Rudroff, M. Weber, J. Galle, C. Wanner, and M. Marx, “Identification of a new tumor suppressor gene located at chromosome 8p21.3-22.,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 17, no. 9, pp. 1180–1182, 2003.

S. Rodrigues-Ferreira, A. Di Tommaso, A. Dimitrov et al., “8p22 MTUS1 gene product ATIP3 is a novel anti-mitotic protein underexpressed in invasive breast carcinoma of poor prognosis,” PLoS ONE, vol. 4, no. 10, Article ID e7239, 2009.

A. Molina, S. Rodrigues-Ferreira, A. Di Tommaso, and C. Nahmias, “[ATIP, a novel superfamily of microtubule-associated proteins].,” Médecine Sciences, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 244–246, 2011.

C. C. Hoogenraad and F. Bradke, “Control of neuronal polarity and plasticity-a renaissance for microtubules?” Trends in Cell Biology, vol. 19, no. 12, pp. 669–676, 2009.

F. E. Poulain and A. Sobel, “The microtubule network and neuronal morphogenesis: dynamic and coordinated orchestration through multiple players,” Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 15–32, 2010.

K. Iqbal, F. Liu, C. X. Gong, and I. Grundke-Iqbal, “Tau in Alzheimer disease and related tauopathies,” Current Alzheimer Research, vol. 7, no. 8, pp. 656–664, 2010.

L. M. Ittner and J. Götz, “Amyloid-β and tau-a toxic pas de deux in Alzheimer's disease,” Nature Reviews Neuroscience, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 65–72, 2011.

S. AbdAlla, H. Lother, A. El Missiry et al., “Angiotensin II AT2 receptor oligomers mediate G-protein dysfunction in an animal model of Alzheimer disease,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 284, no. 10, pp. 6554–6565, 2009.