Nasal Carriage of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus among Healthcare Workers in a Tertiary Care Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal

Introduction Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is one of the most common causes of nosocomial infections. One of the potential risk factors for nosocomial staphylococcal infections is colonization of the anterior nares of healthcare workers (HCWs). Our study aimed to determine the rate of nasal carriage MRSA among HCWs at Manmohan Memorial Medical College and Teaching Hospital, Kathmandu. Methods Two hundred and thirty-two nasal swabs were collected from HCWs of Manmohan Memorial Medical College and Teaching Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal, within six months (February 2018–July 2018). Nasal swabs were cultured, and S. aureus isolates were subjected to the antimicrobial susceptibility test by the modified Kirby–Bauer disc diffusion method. MRSA and iMLSB (inducible macrolide lincosamide streptogramin B) resistance was screened using the cefoxitin disc (30 μg) and D-test (clindamycin and erythromycin sensitivity pattern), respectively, following CLSI (Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute) guidelines. Risk factors for MRSA colonization were determined using the chi-square test considering the p value ˂0.05 as significant. Results A total of 34/232 (14.7%) S. aureus were isolated, out of which 12 (35.3%) were MRSA. The overall rate of nasal carriage MRSA among HCWs was 5.2% (12/232). Colonization of MRSA was higher in males (8.7%) than in females (4.3%). MRSA colonization was found to be at peak among the doctors (11.4%). HCWs of the postoperative ward were colonized highest (18.2%). All MRSA isolates were sensitive to linezolid and tetracycline. iMLSB resistance was shown by 7(20.6%) of the isolates. MRSA strains showed higher iMLSB resistance accounting for 33.3% (4/12) in comparison to methicillin-susceptible strains with 13.6% (3/22). Smoking was found to be significantly associated with MRSA colonization (p=0.004). Conclusion Rate of nasal carriage MRSA is high among HCWs and hence needs special attention to prevent HCW-associated infections that may result due to nasal colonization.


Introduction
Staphylococcus aureus is a major human pathogen which has potential to cause ample of clinical infections ranging from bacteraemia and infective endocarditis to osteoarticular, skin and soft tissue, pleuropulmonary, and device-related infections [1]. With a few exceptions, the incidence of hospital-acquired infection caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is increasing worldwide, resulting in longer hospital stay, prolonged antibiotic administration, and higher costs [2].
Penicillin was introduced in the 1940s to treat staphylococcal infections; however, in 1945, strains of S. aureus developed resistance to it. Later, methicillin was introduced in 1959, but in 1961, S. aureus isolates acquired resistance to methicillin as well [3]. MRSA strains exhibit blanket resistance to virtually all β-lactams, often associated with resistance to other classes of antibiotics [4]. e mecA gene, present on the staphylococcal cassette chromosome (SCC), codes for a low antibiotic affinity PBP (penicillin-binding protein) known as PBP2a, responsible for the resistance among MRSA strains [5].
A few options are available for the treatment of MRSAassociated infections, such as macrolides, lincosamides, and streptogramin B (MLSB) with clindamycin being a good alternative, particularly for skin and soft tissue infections, and also works as an alternative in penicillin-allergic patients [6]. However, MLSB resistance is one of the most common resistance mechanisms detected in Gram-positive organism [7]. MLSB resistance can be either constitutive (cMLSB) or inducible (iMLSB) [8]. Failure in detection of iMLSB resistance may be a clinical failure of clindamycin treatment [9]. Since the incidence of inducible clindamycin resistance is high, accurate identification of inducible clindamycin resistance is important to prevent therapeutic failure in infections caused by these strains [10].
It has been reported that HCWs have been the source of MRSA outbreaks in several cases [11]. S. aureus nasal carrier, a nurse, caused outbreaks in two newborn nurseries at different hospitals in association with upper respiratory tract infections in 1986. Phage typing revealed that the nurse's strain of S. aureus and the outbreak strains were identical [12]. Previous studies suggest possibilities that HCWs play a substantial role in MRSA transmission, highlighting the importance of rapid and accurate identification of MRSA carrier HCWs [13]. S. aureus nasal carriage among the general adult population shows global variation [14]. e knowledge of frequency of nasal carriage S. aureus and MRSA among HCWs along with their current antimicrobial profile becomes necessary in the selection of appropriate treatment options for these carriers. Several studies have shown that the elimination of carriage in the anterior nares reduces the incidence of staphylococcal infections [15].
Hence, this study was carried out to determine the rate of nasal carriage S. aureus and MRSA along with their antimicrobial profile among HCWs. Also, this study aimed to determine the associated risk factors for nasal carriage MRSA.

Study Design.
A hospital-based cross-sectional study was performed in the Department of Microbiology of Manmohan Memorial Medical College and Teaching Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal, within six months (February 2018-July 2018) among 238 HCWs with informed written consent. However, six HCWs did not provide consent, and hence, only 232 HCWs were included in the study. All the participants in the study were interviewed with a standard questionnaire for the clinical history and demographic data.

Inclusion Criteria.
All the hospital staff who provided patient care directly were involved in the study.

Exclusion Criteria.
HCWs presented with wound and upper respiratory tract infection in the last three months were excluded from the study.

Nasal Swab
Collection. Nasal swabs were collected using sterile cotton swab moistened with normal saline. e swab was introduced 1-2 cm in the nasal cavity and rotated 3 times both clockwise and anticlockwise. For each specimen, both nostrils were sampled using the same swab and immediately transported to the laboratory on peptone water. e swabs, after 4 hours of incubation at 37°C on peptone water, were inoculated on mannitol salt agar.  e result was interpreted as per the guidelines of CLSI zone size interpretative chart in terms of "sensitive," "resistant," and "intermediate sensitive." 2.8. Detection of iMLSB Resistance. Erythromycin (E) and clindamycin (CD) sensitivity patterns were reported following CLSI guidelines. Isolates were tested for inducible resistance using the D-test. For the detection of iMLSB resistance, 0.5 McFarland equivalent suspension of organism was inoculated into MHA plate as described in the CLSI recommendation. CD (2 μg) and E (15 μg) discs were placed 15 mm apart from the center on the MHA. Plates were analyzed after 18 hours of incubation at 37°C. If the E zone was ≤13 mm and the CD zone was ≥21 mm and both had a circular shape, the organism was negative for inducible resistance (D-test negative). If the E zone was ≤13 mm and the CD zone was ≥21 mm with a D-shaped zone around the CD, the organism was positive for inducible resistance (Dtest positive).

Data Analysis.
Each sample was encoded with an identification number. Similarly, findings were recorded manually and entered into database.
e analysis was carried out by SPSS version 20 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA). Risk factors for MRSA colonization were determined using the chi-square test considering the p value ˂0.05 as significant.

Results
A total of 232 nasal swabs were collected from HCWs, of which 34 (14.7%) were found to be carriers of S. aureus, and among them, 12/34 (35.3%) HCWs were found to be MRSA carriers. Overall distribution of MRSA was found to be 5.2% (12/232) ( Figure 1).

Demographic Characteristics of the Study Population.
e age of study participants ranged from 16 to 65 years, with a mean age of 28.71 ± 7.8 years. e age group of 25-35 years (47.8%) participated in the study was in higher frequency followed by <25 years (34.1%), 35-45 years (13.4%), and least with the age group of ≥45 years (4.7%). Females were predominantly in higher fractions (80.2%) in the present study (Table 1).
Similarly, the prevalence of MSSA was found to be the highest among laboratory staffs with 25% (5/20), while MRSA was found to be the highest among doctors with 11.4% (5/44) ( Table 2).
Distribution of MSSA was found to be highest in laboratory staffs with 19.2% (5/26), while MRSA was found to be the highest in postoperative ward staffs with 18.2% (2/11) ( Table 3).

Erythromycin and Clindamycin Susceptibility
Pattern of S. aureus. Among 34 isolates, 12 (35.3%) were sensitive to both erythromycin and clindamycin and 2 (5.9%) were resistant to both erythromycin and clindamycin. Similarly, 7 (20.6%) were resistant to erythromycin and sensitive to clindamycin with the D-test being positive, whereas 13 (38.2%) were sensitive to erythromycin and resistant to clindamycin but with the D-test negative. Our study showed higher iMLSB resistance in MRSA strains with 33.3% (4/12) in comparison to MSSA strains with 13.6% (3/ 22). A total of 7/34 (20.6%) of the isolates showed iMLSB resistance (Table 4).

Determining Risk Factors for MRSA Colonization.
Smoking was found to be significantly associated with MRSA colonization (p � 0.004). No other factors were significantly associated with MRSA colonization (Table 5).

Discussion
S. aureus is one of the most common multidrug resistant Gram-positive bacteria and perhaps the pathogen of greatest concern because of its intrinsic virulence, its ability to cause a diverse array of life-threatening infections, and its capacity to adapt to different environmental conditions [16]. In our study, the rate of nasal carriage S. aureus was found to be 14.7%, which is similar to the findings of Khanal [23], and several other studies [24][25][26].
In our study, the overall rate of nasal carriage MRSA was found to be 5.2%. Similar results were found in study performed by Vaidya et al. in India (6%) [20], Boncompain et al. in Argentina (6.3%) [22], and other studies [17][18][19]. However, the prevalence of nasal carriage MRSA in HCWs was found comparatively to be lower in our study in comparison to a study performed in the Gaza strip by Aila et al. (25.5%) [26]. Whereas, the prevalence of MRSA was found to be slightly higher in our study in comparison to findings of Shrestha   International Journal of Microbiology such as sampling techniques, culture methods, identification of S. aureus and MRSA basis, study population, study criteria, and hospital environment.
Profession wise, our study showed the highest MRSA colonization of 11.4% among doctors. Similarly, Vaidya et al. in India reported that doctors were colonized the highest with MRSA [20]. While, Khatri et al. in Nepal reported that lab personnel were the highest nasal carriers of MRSA (10.5%) [18]. However, the study performed by Haftom et al. in Ethiopia reported MRSA carriage the highest among nurses accounting for 7.8% [19]. Higher colonization of MRSA among doctors may be due to frequent patient contact. e high rate of nasal carriage MRSA among HCWs indicates high    International Journal of Microbiology chances of transmission of the pathogen to the patients during patient care [18], which ultimately leads to longer hospital stay, prolonged antibiotic administration, and higher costs. Ward wise, our study showed that HCWs of the postoperative ward were colonized the highest (18.2%). is could be due to the traumatic and postoperative immunological suppression of the patients [29]. As most isolates belonged to HCWs from the postoperative ward, the vulnerability of surgical site wound infection with MRSA among patients, following transmission from carrier HCWs, cannot be ignored. Similarly, Khatri et al. in Nepal reported that the percentages of nasal carriage MRSA (14.3%) were the highest among HCWs from postoperative department [18]. However, Vaidya et al. in India reported that HCWs of the emergency ward were found to be colonized the highest (15.3%) [20]. In contrast, a study performed by Haftom et al. in Ethiopia reported that HCWs of the surgical ward were the highest colonized with MRSA (17.1%) [19].
In our study, all isolated S. aureus (both MRSA and MSSA) were sensitive to linezolid and tetracycline. However, in a study performed by Karimi et al., only 58.4% of S. aureus was sensitive to tetracycline [30]. MRSA strains also showed higher sensitivity to teicoplanin (91.7%), chloramphenicol (91.7%), amikacin (83.3%), and clindamycin (83.3%) in our study. High sensitivity of those antibiotics towards MRSA indicates that these antibiotics might be an option for empirical therapy of MRSA infections in our hospital. Similarly, all isolated MSSA were sensitive to chloramphenicol besides cloxacillin, cefoxitin, cefotaxime, and cefepime, followed by teicoplanin (95.5%), amikacin (95.5%), clindamycin (95.5%), gentamicin (90.9%), and cotrimoxazole (86.4%). Similarly, the abovementioned antibiotics might be implicated for the empirical therapy of MSSA infections in our hospital.
Among 34 isolates, 7 (20.6%) were resistant to erythromycin and sensitive to clindamycin with the D-test being positive. D-test positive was higher (33.3%) in MRSA in comparison to MSSA (13.6%). Our study showed lower iMLSB resistance (33.3%) among MRSA strains in comparison to a study performed by Khanal et al. in Nepal (66.7%) [17]. e differences in findings may be due to various factors such as different study populations, different study periods, and different settings and variations in methodology. Whereas, in a study performed by Adhikari et al. in Nepal, in clinical samples, iMLSB resistance and cMLSB resistance were found to be 11.48% and 29.25%, respectively. Comparatively, iMLSB resistance was found to be higher and cMLSB lower in our study [31]. e differences in findings may be due to differences in samples (nasal swabs vs. clinical samples).
Our study also aimed to determine the risk factors for MRSA colonization. e colonization of MRSA was significantly high among smokers (p � 0.004). Cigarette smoking increases mucus production, impairs epithelial elastic properties, decreases IgA production, and affects phagocyte activities which facilitate bacterial colonization and exacerbate inflammatory responses leading to epithelial damage, further impairing host immunity and promoting bacterial colonization of the respiratory tract [32]. Coinciding with our study, smoking was found to be one of the risk factors for colonization among healthy adults [33].
In our study, other factors were not found to be significantly associated with MRSA colonization. However, years of service and level of education were found to be significantly associated with MRSA colonization in a study performed by Maroof

6
International Journal of Microbiology identifying strains with the same genotype that helps to add further evidence on the relationship between nasal carriage MRSA among HCWs and incidence of staphylococcal infections among patients. is study is based only on the phenotypic methods. It reveals only about the carriage status of S. aureus (carriage status of other organisms such as coagulase-negative S. aureus was not studied). Also, this study only determines the carriage status but does not suggest about the ways for its decolonization.

Conclusion
Our study revealed that the nasal carriage S. aureus and MRSA is high among HCWs, especially among the doctors and the HCWs of the postoperative ward. iMLSB resistance is higher in MRSA than in MSSA strains. e high rate of nasal carriage MRSA among HCWs indicates the need for standard infection control precautions to be employed in the professional practice to minimize the carriage as well as the transmission rate. Our study also suggested that smoking is significantly associated with MRSA colonization.

Data Availability
e data generated to support the findings of this study are included within the article. e primary raw data are available to interested researchers from the corresponding author upon request.

Consent
Written informed consent was taken from all the participants involved in the study.

Conflicts of Interest
e authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.