The twin photons produced by a type-II spontaneous parametric down conversion are well know
as a potential source of photons for quantum teleportation due to the strong entanglement in polarization. This strong entanglement in polarization, however, depends on the spectral composition of the pump photon and the nature of optical isotropy of the crystal. By exact numerical calculation of the concurrence, we have shown that how pump photons spectral width and the birefringence nature of the crystal directly affect the degree of polarization entanglement of the twin photons.
The realization of faithful transmission of information in quantum communication [1, 2], completely secure information exchange in quantum cryptography [3], and the fastest quantum computers [4, 5] fundamentally requires entangled state of the Bell type. The twin photons produced by spontaneous parametric down conversion (SPDC) via a pump photon interacting with a β-barium borate, BaB2O4 (BBO), nonlinear crystal are one of the common source of entangled state of the Bell type. There is an increasing interest in the spectral and spatial properties of the down-converted photons and, specifically, in achieving particular spatial and spectral profiles [6, 7]. The spectral and spatial characteristics of SPDC photons are influenced both by the phase-matching properties of the crystal and by the spectral composition of the pump light. Previous works have shown that a broadband pump, for example, has been shown to lead to different signal and idler spectra in type-II SPDC [8]. Recently, Humble and Grice [9] using the signal-idler state in type-II SPDC have reported that polarization entanglement of the signal and idler photons as well as the fidelity of the teleportation based on the polarization states of these photons depends on the spectral entanglement. This study is carried out for the case in which the amplitudes in the joint signal-idler state which determines the spectral entanglement is approximated by a correlated Gaussian function. In this study we use the exact joint signal-idler biphoton state in type-II SPDC [8] and investigate how the degree of polarization entanglement of the two photons changes as the corresponding crystal transit times and the pump spectral composition vary. These results are also discussed in comparison with the approximate results reported by Humble and Grice [9].
In parametric down-conversion type-I phase matching leads to two photons with same polarization. In this phase matching, if the down-conversion is degenerated, a pair of two photons with identical frequency emerges on a cone [10] which is centered on the pump beam whose opening angle depends on the angle between the crystal optic axis and the pump. On the other hand with type-II phase matching, the down-converted photons are emitted into two cones, one horizontally polarized (h) and the other vertically polarized (v). In the collinear situation the two cones are tangent to one another on exactly one line, namely, the pump beam direction. The two particular directions can be chosen in the noncollinear case where the two cones intersect each other, and the two correlated photons are produced in an entangled state of the form, |h,v〉+|v,h〉. Experimentally, such form of polarization-entangled state using this technique has been demonstrated using a single BBO crystal [11].
In Type-II parametric down-conversion we consider the case where the nonlinearity of the crystal does not depend on frequency so that the gain of the parametric interaction is constant. We also assume that the down-converted beams are constrained to be nearly collinear. The beam that pumps the crystals is pulsed laser which is much stronger than the down-converted beams. Under these conditions and taking into account that parametric down-conversion is very much ineffective, along the two directions, the state of the two photons can be written as [8, 12]
|ψ23〉=A∫dω2∫dω3α(ω2+ω3){Φ(ω2,ω3)×|h2(ω2),v3(ω3)〉+Φ(ω3,ω2)|h3(ω3),v2(ω2)〉},
where A is a normalization constant,
α(ωi+ωj)=exp[-(2ω0-(ωi+ωj))2/2σp2]
is the pump envelope function which ensures conservation of energy, and
Φ(ωi,ωj)=sin{[k2(ωi)+k3(ωj)-kp(ωi+ωj)]L}[k2(ωi)+k3(ωj)-kp(ωi+ωj)]L
is the phase-matching function which ensures conservation of momentum for i,j=2,3 and i≠j. Here, σp determines the bandwidth of the pump photons. Since the pump envelope function depends on the sum frequency, it is symmetric with respect to ω2 and ω3. However, in the phase-matching function Φ(ωi,ωj), since the crystal is birefringent k2(ωi)≠k3(ωj),Φ(ωi,ωj) is not symmetric in its frequency arguments (Φ(ωj,ωi)≠Φ(ωi,ωj)). By expanding the three wave vectors in series about their respective center frequencies (i.e., k2(ωi) and k3(ωj) about ω0, kp(ωi+ωj) about 2ω0), for a perfect phase matching at the center frequencies (i.e., k2(ω0)+k3(ω0)=kp(2ω0)) and small mismatch for off-central frequencies, the phase matching function can be approximated as
Φ(ωi,ωj)≃sin[τp2(ωi-ω0)+τp3(ωj-ω0)]τp2(ωi-ω0)+τp3(ωj-ω0),
where the constants
τpn=(∂kp/∂ω|ω=2ω0-∂kn/∂ω|ω=ω0)L
represent the difference in transit times through the crystal between the pump and the first down-converted photon (n=2) and the pump and the second down-converted photon (n=3), respectively.
Introducing the variables, Δωi,j=ωi,j-ω0, and using the expressions for the phase-matching function in (4) and the pump envelop function in (2), we can write (1) as
|ψ23〉=∫dΔω2∫dΔω3{f(Δωi,Δωj)×|h2(Δωi),v3(Δωj)〉+f(Δωj,Δωi)|h3(Δωj),v2(Δωi)〉},
where the function f(Δωi,Δωj) is given by
f(Δωi,Δωj)=Nijexp{-(Δωi+Δωj)2/2σp2}×{sin[τp2Δωi+τp3Δωj]/(τp2Δωi+τp3Δωj)}
for i=2,3 with i≠j, representing the spectral amplitude for the two different polarization states of the down-converted photons. These amplitudes depend on the bandwidth of the pump mode and crystal transit times (τp2 and τp3) for the down-converted photon 2 and photon 3 with respect to the transit time for the pump mode, respectively. Using (6) and (7), we will study explicitly the direct effect of the transit times difference (τp2,τp3) and the pump spectral linewidth (σp) in the degree of the polarization entanglement between the two down-converted photons.
The degree of entanglement of a bipartite system, quantitatively, can be described using the von Neumann entropy [13, 14] or the concurrence [15]. Here, we will use the concurrence to quantitatively describe the entanglement of the two photons. To this end, for the case of discrete bipartite density matrix ρ, the concurrence, C, is given by [15]
C=max{0,λ1-λ2-λ3-λ4},
in which the λk's (with λ1≧λ2≧λ3≧λ4) are the square roots of the eigenvalues of the Hermitian matrix
ρ̃=ρ̂23σ̂2y⊗σ̂3yρ̂23*σ̂3y⊗σ̂2y.
In (9), ρ̂23=|ψ23〉〈ψ23| is the two photon density operator which can be expressed as a quadruple integral using the state vector in (6), σ̂2y=i|v2〉〈h2|-i|h2〉〈v2| and σ̂3y=i|v3〉〈h3|-i|h3〉〈v3| are the Pauli single-qubit operators. By tracing over the spectral states of the two photons, we determined the matrix elements of the Hermitian matrix, ρ̃. We then diagonalized the matrix to obtain the eigenvalues λ1, λ2, λ3, and λ4 that we substituted into (8). The resulting expression for the concurrence is found to be
C=∫d(Δω2)d(Δω3)f(Δω2,Δω3)f*(Δω3,Δω2).
Equation (10) depends on the spectral amplitudes f(Δω2,Δω3) and f(Δω3,Δω2) which are determined by the birefringence of the crystal and the pump spectral distribution. If the crystal is optically isotropic, we would find that f(Δω2,Δω3)=f(Δω3,Δω2) and the concurrence, for normalized spectral amplitudes
∫d(Δωi)d(Δωj)|f(Δωi,Δωj)|2=1,
become C=1. However, when f(Δω2,Δω3)≠f(Δω3,Δω2), previous studies have shown that the degree of polarization entanglement can drastically decrease [9]. These studies assume an approximate Gaussian function for the Sinc function in (4) describing the phase mismatch resulting from optical anisotropy of the crystal which leads to different relative transit times for the down-converted photons (τp2 and τp3). In the following, without this approximation, we will study the direct effect of optical anisotropy of the crystal and the spectral line width of a Gaussian pump photons. To this end, we note that applying the expression for the spectral amplitudes in (7), the concurrence in (10) can be rewritten as
C=N23N32∫d(Δω2)d(Δω3)exp[-(Δω2+Δω3)2/σp2]×sin[τp2Δω2+τp3Δω3]sin[τp2Δω3+τp3Δω2]/(τp2Δω2+τp3Δω3)(τp2Δω3+τp3Δω2),
where the constants Nij's are normalization constants that should be obtained using (11).
We first examine how the degree of the entanglement of the down-converted photons depends on the spectral bandwidth of the pump photons, σp. In Figure 1, on the inset, we have shown the square of the magnitude of the Gaussian spectral profile of the pump photons [exp{-(Δω2+Δω3)2/σp2}] for different values of the pump bandwidth, σp=0.1 (blue [a]),0.5 (red [b]),1.0 (green [c]), and 4.0 (pink [d]), respectively. For each of these values of spectral bandwidth the concurrence in (12) along with corresponding normalization factors Nij's in (11) is calculated as a function of crystal transit time difference between the pump and the down-converted photons, τp2 and τp3. The colored curves shown in Figure 1 is the result for the corresponding concurrence, C, as function of τp2/τp3. These curves labeled as (a), (b), (c), and (d) show how the concurrence is affected as we vary τp2/τp3 when the pump photons bandwidth is σp=0.1 [blue (a)],0.5 [red (b)],1.0 [green (c)], and 4.0 [pink (d)], respectively. Comparing these curves with the corresponding pump photons spectral profile, we note that as the pump bandwidth becomes narrower, the effect of the difference in crystal transit time on the entanglement of the two photons becomes negligible. This means that the optical anisotropy of the crystal which causes the difference in crystal transit times has no significant effect on the entanglement when the incident pump photons have a negligible bandwidth. On the other hand, as the pump spectral profile becomes broader, the effect of optical anisotropy of the crystal becomes significant. We observe this behavior for the entanglement in Figure 1 where the concurrence becomes less than unity, rapidly, as the pump becomes broader and τp2/τp3<1. However, when τp2/τp3=1, the two down-converted photons have the same crystal transit time which means that the crystal is optically isotropic. Under this condition, independent of the spectral bandwidth of the pump photons, the entanglement remains maximal, C=1.
The concurrence as a function of the ratio of the crystal transit times difference (τp2/τp3) and the pump and the second down-converted photon. Note: σp=0.1 (blue [a]), σp=0.5 (red [b]), σp=1.0 (green [c]), and σp=4.0 (pink [d]).
Humble and Grice [9] have studied the entanglement of the two photons when the expression for the joint spectral amplitude, f(Δω1,Δω2), in (7) is approximated by choosing a constant γ=0.42 to match the full width at half maximum of a Gaussian function for the phase matching function:
sin[(τp2Δω2+τp3Δω3)]/τp2Δω2+τp3Δω3≃exp(-γ2(τp2Δω2+τp3Δω3)2),
so that joint spectral amplitude in (7) can be approximated as
f(Δω2,Δω3)≃N23exp[-(Δω2+Δω3)2/2σp2-γ(τp2Δω2+τp3Δω3)2/2].
Then, for this approximation, the expression for the concurrence in (10) becomes
C=4σ22σ32(1-ρ2)/[(σ22+σ32)2-σ22σ32ρ2],
where
ρ=-(1-γτp2τp3σp2)/(1+γτp22σp2)(1+γτp32σp2),σ2-2=(σp-2+γτp22)(1-ρ2),σ3-2=(σp-2+γτp32)(1-ρ2).
Using the results in (15)–(16), we have analyzed the entanglement of the two photons in comparison with the exact result as predicted by (12). The concurrence, C, for both the exact and approximate cases is calculated for selected values of τp2/τp3 as a function of the pump spectral width, σp, and the results are shown in Figure 2. When the crystal is optically isotropic (τp2/τp3=1), the photons reveal a maximal entanglement (C=1) independent of the pump spectral width since the phase-matching function becomes symmetrical. As a result the concurrence is equal to unity for all values of the spectral width for both the exact (sinc) and approximate (Gaussian) phase-matching functions as described by the overlapping solid and dotted curves; see (a) in Figure 2. On the other hand as the crystal becomes optically anisotropic (τp2/τp3>1), the approximate and the exact results for the concurrence begin to differ when the spectral width of the pump photons increases, as illustrated by the solid and dotted curves (b)–(d) in Figure 2, respectively. These curves show that the approximate results under-predict the degree of entanglement of the down-converted photons for spectrally broad Gaussian pump photons as compared to the corresponding exact prediction. This is shown by the solid curves (approximate) which stay under the corresponding dotted curves representing the exact result for the concurrence.
The concurrence as a function of the pump spectral width σp for different values of the ratio of the crystal transit times (τp2/τp3). The dotted curves are the exact, and the solid curves are approximate. The in-set on the top represents the phase-matching functions, exact (the dotted curve) and approximate (the solid curve).
In conclusion, the Gaussian approximation for the phase matching function in type-II SPDC does not accurately predict the degree of polarization entanglement of the down-converted photons for a pump photon with broad spectral composition. This result may potentially be usefully to design a more effective experimental scheme for optimization of polarization entanglement of the twin photons in type-II SPDC.
Acknowledgments
This work is in part supported by US Department of Energy and Oak Ridge Institute for Science & Education and Middle Tennessee State University. The author thanks Travis S. Humble and Warren P. Grice.
BennettC. H.BrassardG.CrépeauC.JozsaR.PeresA.WoottersW. K.Teleporting an unknown quantum state via dual classical and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen channels199370131895189910.1103/PhysRevLett.70.1895EID2-s2.0-4243059985GisinN.Nicolas.Gisin@physics.unige.chThewR.Quantum communication200713165171EID2-s2.0-704424960710.1038/nphoton.2007.22EkertA. K.Quantum cryptography based on Bell's theorem199167666166310.1103/PhysRevLett.67.661EID2-s2.0-0343152990NielsenM. A.ChuangI. L.2000New York, NY, USACambridge University PressKnillE.LaflammeR.MilburnG. J.A scheme for efficient quantum computation with linear optics20014096816465210.1038/35051009EID2-s2.0-0035804255CarrascoS.NasrM. B.SergienkoA. V.Broadband light generation by noncollinear parametric downconversion200631225325510.1364/OL.31.000253EID2-s2.0-33644549693O'DonnellK. A.U'RenA. B.Observation of ultrabroadband, beamlike parametric downconversion200732781781910.1364/OL.32.000817EID2-s2.0-33947113370GriceW. P.WalmsleyI. A.Spectral information and distinguishability in type-II down-conversion with a broadband pump199756216271634EID2-s2.0-0000723601HumbleT. S.humblets@ornl.govGriceW. P.gricewp@ornl.govSpectral effects in quantum teleportation2007752022307EID2-s2.0-3384695609510.1103/PhysRevA.75.022307ChiaoR. Y.KwiatP. G.SteinbergA. M.BedersonB.WaltherH.Optical tests of quantum mechanics199434New York, NY, USAAcademic PressKwiatP. G.MattleK.WeinfurterH.ZeilingerA.SergienkoA. V.ShihY.New high-intensity source of polarization-entangled photon pairs199575244337434110.1103/PhysRevLett.75.4337EID2-s2.0-27044434968KellerT. E.RubinM. H.Theory of two-photon entanglement for spontaneous parametric down-conversion driven by a narrow pump pulse199756215341541EID2-s2.0-0000071869SchumacherB.Quantum coding19955142738274710.1103/PhysRevA.51.2738EID2-s2.0-33748608655JozsaR.SchumacherB.A new proof of the quantum noiseless coding theorem19944123432349WoottersW. K.Entanglement of formation of an arbitrary state of two qubits1998801022452248EID2-s2.0-4243684526