International Journal of Polymer Science
Volume 2015 (2015), Article ID 343294, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/343294

Research Article

Water Absorption and Thermomechanical Characterization of Extruded Starch/Poly(lactic acid)/Agave Bagasse Fiber Bioplastic Composites

F. J. Aranda-García, R. González-Núñez, C. F. Jasso-Gastinel, and E. Mendizábal

Departamento de Ingeniería Química, Centro Universitario de Ciencias Exactas e Ingenierías, Universidad de Guadalajara, Boulevard Marcelino García Barragán 1421, 44430 Guadalajara, JAL, Mexico

Received 7 February 2015; Revised 16 June 2015; Accepted 18 June 2015

Academic Editor: Vijay K. Thakur

Copyright © 2015 F. J. Aranda-García et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

Water absorption and thermomechanical behavior of composites based on thermoplastic starch (TPS) are presented in this work, wherein the concentration of agave bagasse fibers (ABF, 0–15 wt%) and poly(lactic acid) (PLA, 0–30 wt%) is varied. Glycerol (G) is used as starch (S) plasticizer to form TPS. Starch stands as the polymer matrix (70/30 wt/wt, S/G). The results show that TPS hygroscopicity decreases as PLA and fiber content increase. Storage, stress-strain, and flexural moduli increase with PLA and/or agave bagasse fibers (ABF) content while impact resistance decreases. The TPS glass transition temperature increases with ABF content and decreases with PLA content. Micrographs of the studied biocomposites show a stratified brittle surface with a rigid fiber fracture.

1. Introduction

Nowadays, the interest in bioplastics is growing for market niches such as packaging, agriculture, or automotive parts among others. They are classified in biodegradable and biobased/nonbiodegradable. In 2014, their total global production capacity reached 1.67 million tons, where 643,000 tons corresponded to biodegradable plastics [1]. By 2018, the production capacity is expected to reach more than 6 million tons, where 1.06 million will correspond to the biodegradable type [1]. The main sources of biomass to produce bioplastics are grains (usually corn), sugar cane bagasse, potatoes, and castor oil. It is reported that other natural sources such as cellulose and corn stover will also become an important raw material [1].

Since starch (S) is an economical biopolymer that is contained in many natural products, it is attractive as a source to make biodegradable plastics [2]. In dry form, depending on the source and characterization method, starch shows a melting temperature () that varies from 200°C [2] to 220 [3] or even 240°C [4]; however, with 10 % of humidity, its decreases to 160°C [3]. It is mainly composed of amylose and amylopectin which show very different physical and chemical properties [2, 4, 5].

Starch has to be plasticized to lower its high [3] and processing temperature to avoid degradation before [6] it melts. Plastification with water, glycerol, sorbitol, sugars, or amino acids lowers its and its glass transition temperature () [6] forming a thermoplastic starch (TPS) and increasing its moldability. Glycerol (G) is the plasticizer most commonly used for starch in proportions ranging from 20 to 50% by weight. Unfortunately, materials based on starch have low mechanical properties because of its hydrophilic character [7–9]. To overcome that problem, TPS has been mixed with other polymers (forming polymer blends) [3, 4], or with reinforcing agents (e.g., natural or synthetic fibers) [2, 5, 7]. Natural fibers as reinforcing materials offer some advantages; among them the following may be mentioned: improvement of some mechanical properties of the polymer matrix [10, 11], minimization of environmental pollution [9], and lower production costs; however, natural fibers present the limitation that processing temperatures are restricted to less than 200°C.

Dufresne and Vignon in an early work on starch/fiber composites reported that thermomechanical properties of potato starch films were improved when they were mixed with cellulose nanofibers, showing also a decrease in moisture sensitivity, while maintaining biodegradability. Additionally, they found that increasing the glycerol content the equilibrium moisture increased and that such parameter decreased when the fiber content was augmented [5].

Huneault and Li studied mixtures of TPS with poly(lactic acid) (PLA) using maleic acid as a compatibilizer. They reported that Young modulus () and tensile strength increased when PLA content was increased [12]. An increase in and tensile strength of TPS was reported using poly(lactic acid) fibrillation for reinforcement [13].

Although there are several works that follow the effect of PLA or natural fibers on moisture absorption and mechanical properties of TPS, there are very few reports on the effect of the simultaneous addition of both materials to the TPS. Furthermore, there is only scarce data on properties of TPS composites containing cellulosic fibers that were obtained as a byproduct of an industrial process. Teixeira et al. reported the use of cassava bagasse to obtain fiber reinforced TPS and PLA/TPS blends, but tensile strength did not increase significantly and the fiber essentially acted as a filler [14]. Castaño et al. found that reinforcing a TPS/PLA/PVA blend with pehuen cellulosic husk, the increase on mechanical properties was small [15]. Using pineapple fibers in TPS/PLA blends, an improvement in mechanostatic properties and water resistance was reported [16]. Cellulose derivatives have also been used to reinforce starch [17].

Using PLA [18, 19] or PCL [20] as polymer matrix with agave sisalana (sisal) as reinforcer, the results showed an increase in storage [18, 19], flexural [18], and tensile moduli [20].

In this work, the effects of the amount of PLA and/or agave bagasse fibers on moisture absorption and mechanical and thermal properties of TPS are reported. This is the first report on the application of agave bagasse fibers to reinforce TPS/PLA blends, which are discarded fibers from industrial processes.

2. Experimental

2.1. Materials

The materials used in this work were corn starch (IMSA) with 10% humidity, glycerol QP (Golden Bell Products), agave bagasse (tequilana Weber blue var.) fiber, PLA (Ingeo Biopolymer 3521D Industries Leben), and Magnesium Nitrate (Fermont). To prepare TPS, after the starch was dried for 24 h at 60°C, it was manually mixed with glycerol (30 wt%) until a homogeneous mixture was obtained. TPS was mixed with different amounts of PLA and/or fiber (Table 1), in a corotating twin-screw extruder (Leistritz Micro 27 equipment GL/GG 32D) to obtain a continuous cord of polymer blend or composites that were pelletized after extrusion. The pellets of the different materials were first dried at 60°C until a constant weight was obtained; then, they were molded by thermal compression in a Schwabenthan Polystat 200T compression equipment at 180°C and 200 bars during 2.5 minutes, maintaining pressure for 10 more minutes during the cooling stage.

Table 1: Composite formulations.

S, g
G, g
TPS, g
PLA, g
ABF, g
PLA wt% in polymer blend●
ABF wt% in composite▼

70
30
100
0
0
0
0

63
27
90
10
0
10
0

56
24
80
20
0
20
0

49
21
70
30
0
30
0

70
30
100
0
11.11
0
10

63
27
90
10
11.11
10
10

56
24
80
20
11.11
20
10

49
21
70
30
11.11
30
10

70
30
100
0
17.65
0
15

63
27
90
10
17.65
10
15

56
24
80
20
17.65
20
15

49
21
70
30
17.65
30
15

TPS represents the mixture of S and G. ●Polymer blend represents the mixture of TPS and PLA. ▼Composite represents the mixture of TPS, PLA, and ABF.

2.2. Equilibrium Moisture

First, composites were dried at 60°C for 24 h; then the material was weighed and placed at 25°C in a closed chamber maintained at a relative humidity of 53% (saturated solution of magnesium nitrate). The composites weight was recorded periodically until a constant weight was obtained.

2.3. Mechanical Tests

Mechanodynamic tests were carried out following ASTM D5023-01, using a thermomechanical analyzer (TA Q800 DMA) and the following conditions: temperature range, −85°C to 150°C, heating rate, 2°C/min, three-point bending clamp, and frequency of 1 Hz. Mechanostatic tests were carried out at 25°C following ASTM D638-04 for stress-strain (Instron 4411, crosshead speed: 5 mm/min), ASTM D790-03 for flexure (Instron 4411), and ASTM D6110-04 (Instron, Ceast 9050) for Charpy impact testing.

2.4. Thermal Characterization

Thermal behavior of the samples was followed by DSC (Q Series DSC Q100, TA Instruments), using ASTM D3418-03. Heating rate was 10°C/min from 20 to 180°C.

2.5. Morphology

Samples were observed by Field Emission Scanning Electronic Microscopy (FE-SEM (Tescan, Mira3)). The samples were frozen in liquid nitrogen for 5 minutes before fracture. Subsequently, the samples were dried at 60°C before FE-SEM observation.

3. Results

3.1. Moisture Absorption

Figure 1 shows moisture absorption of the polymer blend and the composites containing 20 wt% PLA. Such figure illustrates that the rate of moisture absorption decreases as the ABF content increases and that equilibrium is reached in approximately two weeks. Similar moisture absorption behavior was obtained for the other materials.

Figure 1: Moisture absorption of TPS/PLA/Fiber composites as a function of time for the polymer blend and composites containing 20 wt% PLA.

For moisture absorption, it can also be noticed that an increase in ABF content reduces the equilibrium moisture value (Figure 2); that behavior can be explained in terms of the lower hydrophilic character of the fiber comparing with the TPS. Like in this case, it has been reported that composites of TPS with sugarcane bagasse fibers showed a decrease in moisture equilibrium when fiber content was increased [21]. Additionally, since PLA is a less hydrophilic polymer than TPS, independently of fiber content, increasing PLA concentration causes a decrease in the moisture absorption capacity of the composite (Figure 2).

Figure 2: Equilibrium moisture of polymer blends and composites varying PLA content.

3.2. Thermomechanical Analysis

In Figure 3 the storage modulus () is presented as a function of temperature for the composites containing 20 wt% of PLA. There, an overlapping plateau for the 3 samples can be observed from −30 to 40°C; however, the composites maintain the plateau value for about 10°C more than the polymer blend. Such additional temperature resistance before decay is important for outdoor thermoplastic applications and indicates that the fiber acts as a reinforcing material due to its rigidity and hydrogen bonding between the polymer blend and the ABF. Similar storage modulus behavior was obtained for the other composites. Such type of effect has been reported for TPS reinforced with cellulose fibers [22].

Figure 3: Storage modulus as a function of temperature for the polymer blend and composites containing 20 wt% of PLA.

The storage modulus at 25°C of the studied composites is shown in Figure 4. Such figure indicates that higher storage moduli are obtained with the inclusion of ABF and/or PLA, and such increase is larger as more PLA and/or ABF are added. The reinforcement effect of PLA and ABF along with hydrogen bonding leads to a decrease in chains mobility. It has been reported that modulus increases with fiber content [7, 22, 23] due to the high compatibility between TPS and cellulose fillers [5, 10]. Reports about it include bleached leaf wood fibers [24], fibers from bleached eucalyptus pulp [25], flax and ramie fibers [26], wood pulp [27], and tunicin whiskers [28–30].

Figure 4: Storage modulus of polymer blends and composites at 25°C, varying PLA content.

Figure 5 shows tan  versus temperature for the composites containing 20 wt% of PLA. This figure shows that the peaks appear in three regions: (a) around −55°C ( of glycerol), (b) at 54–57°C, which is attributed to of PLA, and (c) at 115–130°C that corresponds to of S.

Figure 5: tan  versus temperature for polymer blend and composites containing 20 wt% PLA.

Using tan  results of the polymer blend and composites containing different amounts of PLA and ABF, the values of TPS are presented in Table 2. The values indicate that an increase in PLA content promotes a decrease in ; such behavior can be explained by the lower value of PLA compared to that of the starch ( > 110°C) [3, 4]. In Table 2, it can also be noticed that for constant PLA content, there is an increase in as fiber content increases; the displacement can be attributed to the decrease of starch chains mobility and the H-bond interactions between ABF and TPS [7, 22, 24].

Table 2: of starch in polymer blends and composites.

PLA content in polymer blend, wt%
ABF content in composites, wt%

0
10
15

10
120°C
124°C
132°C

20
115°C
120°C
130°C

30
111°C
114°C
127°C

3.3. Thermal Analysis

The DSC thermogram (Figure 6) shows the thermal transitions of the polymer blend and composites containing 20 wt% of PLA. For the curves, at approximately 60°C, a change in slope can be observed due to the of PLA. Those temperature values are presented in Table 3. The small decrement in for the composites with respect to the pure PLA obtained here (62°C) can be attributed to glycerin migration, as Li and Huneault reported [31]. In addition, Martin and Avérous reported a small decrease in of PLA by the presence of glycerol [32]. For the composites containing the larger amount of fiber (15 wt%), the of PLA shows a slight decrease by enhanced PLA chain mobility. Jaafar et al. reported a decrease in of PLA, which they attributed to the inclusion of Kenaf fibers that increased PLA chains mobility because fibers separate PLA chains [33].

Table 3: of PLA in polymer blends and composites.

PLA content in polymer blend, wt%
ABF content in composites, wt%

0
10
15

10
57.0°C
57.1°C
54.5°C

20
57.0°C
57.3°C
55.5°C

30
57.0°C
57.0°C
56.0°C

Figure 6: Thermograms of the polymer blend and composites containing 20 wt% of PLA.

The exothermic peak that appears at approximately 100°C is related to PLA crystallization (), as a result of the interaction of PLA and TPS, [32]. values are shown in Table 4, where no noticeable effect can be seen for a fiber or PLA concentration increase (equivalent to TPS concentration decrease). Teixeira et al. reported a small decrease in the of PLA using cassava bagasse [14].

Table 4: of PLA in polymer blends and composites.

PLA content in polymer blend, wt%
ABF content in composites, wt%

0
10
15

10
100.0°C
100.7°C
99.1°C

20
99.9°C
99.8°C
101.0°C

30
98.9°C
100.4°C
100.2°C

For the polymeric materials of Figure 6, the small variation in the slope of the curves indicates that the of S appears at 110–130°C. Those values correspond to the tan  peaks shown in Figure 5.

Figure 6 also shows peaks between 110 and 130°C due to of starch, which coincide with the obtained by mechanodynamic tests, which confirms that increasing fiber content increases .

The endothermic peaks at the high temperature zone correspond to PLA melting temperature (). The peak temperature values presented in Table 5 show that slight changes in PLA melting temperature correspond to an increase with PLA content and a decrease with ABF addition. Such decrease can be explained by the interference that fibers may cause to allow PLA crystallization. Before the PLA melting peaks, the correspondent small shoulder is attributed to rearrangement of lamellar fractions formed during PLA crystallization [34], or premelting of small crystals.

Table 5: of PLA in polymer blends and composites.

PLA content in polymer blend, wt%
ABF content in composites, wt%

0
10
15

10
163.0°C
164.5°C
161.0°C

20
165.9°C
163.6°C
163.4°C

30
166.1°C
165.9°C
163.2°C

3.4. Mechanostatical Tests

Even though mechanodynamic tests allowed the thermomechanical characterization of extruded materials, mechanostatic tests of some of the composites are included to confirm their moduli values pattern, as well as to determine impact resistance behavior. In Figure 7 Young modulus of polymer blends and composites as a function of PLA and fiber content is shown. The inclusion of PLA and/or ABF promotes an increase in modulus. Those patterns are in agreement with the storage modulus values obtained at 25°C (Figure 4).

Figure 7: Young modulus of polymer blends and composites at 25°C, varying PLA content.

Figure 8 shows flexural modulus of the polymeric materials as a function of PLA and fiber content. For this parameter, an increase in PLA and/or fiber content leads to composites with higher flexural modulus, supporting the results obtained for the other moduli.

Figure 8: Flexural modulus of polymer blends and composites at 25°C, varying PLA content.

In Figure 9, it can be noticed that the increase in rigidity of the TPS caused by the addition of PLA and/or ABF leads to a large decrease in impact resistance.

Figure 9: Impact resistance of polymer blends and composites at 25°C varying PLA content.

3.5. Morphology

In Figure 10, micrographs of fractured samples of (a) TPS, (b) polymer blend containing 20 wt% of PLA, and (c) 80 TPS/20 PLA w/w, with 15 wt% ABF composite are shown. In Figure 10(a), uniform gelatinized starch granules can be observed. Figure 10(b) shows a stratified brittle surface. The fibers in the composite can be seen in Figure 10(c), and a rigid fracture is noticed.

(a)

(b)

(c)

Figure 10: SEM images of polymeric materials: (a) TPS, (b) polymer blend containing 20 wt% PLA, and (c) 80 TPS/20 PLA w/w, with 15 wt% ABF composite.

4. Conclusions

Blends of TPS and PLA and composites of TPS/PLA/ABF prepared by extrusion followed by compression molding were characterized. The reinforcing effect of PLA and/or ABF in TPS led to an increase in moduli and a decrease in moisture absorption and impact resistance. The TPS glass transition temperature increased with ABF content and decreased with PLA content.

The reinforcing effect of PLA was enhanced by the incorporation of ABF, although the reduction in impact resistance is not convenient. That kind of behavior is expected generically for rigid materials; nevertheless, the wood appearance and biodegradability, along with the increase in moduli as well as thermal resistance, and the decrease in water absorption justify the production of this type of composites for many applications.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgment

F. J. Aranda-García acknowledges CONACYT for a scholarship.

References

Institute for Bioplastics and Biocomposites and Nova-Institute, More Bioplastic Statistic, European Bioplastics, 2014, http://www.bio-based.eu/markets.

J. L. Guimarães, F. Wypych, C. K. Saul, L. P. Ramos, and K. G. Satyanarayana, “Studies of the processing and characterization of corn starch and its composites with banana and sugarcane fibers from Brazil,” Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 80, no. 1, pp. 130–138, 2010.

H. Wang, X. Sun, and P. Seib, “Effects of starch moisture on properties of wheat starch/poly (lactic acid) blend containing methylenediphenyl diisocyanate,” Journal of Polymers and the Environment, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 133–138, 2002.

P. Sarazin, G. Li, W. J. Orts, and B. D. Favis, “Binary and ternary blends of polylactide, polycaprolactone and thermoplastic starch,” Polymer, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 599–609, 2008.

A. Dufresne and M. R. Vignon, “Improvement of starch film performances using cellulose microfibrils,” Macromolecules, vol. 31, no. 8, pp. 2693–2696, 1998.

H. Liu, F. Xie, L. Yu, L. Chen, and L. Li, “Thermal processing of starch-based polymers,” Progress in Polymer Science, vol. 34, no. 12, pp. 1348–1368, 2009.

J. Gironès, J. P. López, P. Mutjé, A. J. F. Carvalho, A. A. S. Curvelo, and F. Vilaseca, “Natural fiber-reinforced thermoplastic starch composites obtained by melt processing,” Composites Science and Technology, vol. 72, no. 7, pp. 858–863, 2012.

R. L. Shogren, “Poly(ethylene oxide)-coated granular starch-poly(hydroxybutyrate-co-hydroxyvalerate) composite materials,” Journal of Environmental Polymer Degradation, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 75–80, 1995.

L. Yu, K. Dean, and L. Li, “Polymer blends and composites from renewable resources,” Progress in Polymer Science, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 576–602, 2006.

A. Dufresne, D. Dupeyre, and M. R. Vignon, “Cellulose microfibrils from potato tuber cells: processing and characterization of starch–cellulose microfibril composites,” Journal of Applied Polymer Science, vol. 76, no. 14, pp. 2080–2092, 2000.

M. J. John and S. Thomas, “Biofibres and biocomposites,” Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 71, no. 3, pp. 343–364, 2008.

M. A. Huneault and H. Li, “Morphology and properties of compatibilized polylactide/thermoplastic starch blends,” Polymer, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 270–280, 2007.

L. Jiang, B. Liu, and J. Zhang, “Novel high-strength thermoplastic starch reinforced by in situ poly(lactic acid) fibrillation,” Macromolecular Materials and Engineering, vol. 294, no. 5, pp. 301–305, 2009.

E. D. M. Teixeira, A. A. S. Curvelo, A. C. Corrêa, J. M. Marconcini, G. M. Glenn, and L. H. C. Mattoso, “Properties of thermoplastic starch from cassava bagasse and cassava starch and their blends with poly (lactic acid),” Industrial Crops and Products, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 61–68, 2012.

J. Castaño, S. Rodríguez-Llamazares, C. Carrasco, and R. Bouza, “Physical, chemical and mechanical properties of pehuen cellulosic husk and its pehuen-starch based composites,” Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 90, no. 4, pp. 1550–1556, 2012.

W. Smitthipong, R. Tantatherdtam, and R. Chollakup, “Effect of pineapple leaf fiber-reinforced thermoplastic starch/poly(lactic acid) green composite: mechanical, viscosity, and water resistance properties,” Journal of Thermoplastic Composite Materials, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 717–729, 2015.

V. A. Alvarez and A. Vázquez, “Thermal degradation of cellulose derivatives/starch blends and sisal fibre biocomposites,” Polymer Degradation and Stability, vol. 84, no. 1, pp. 13–21, 2004.

M. Prajer and M. P. Ansell, “Thermomechanical evaluation of sisal-PLA composites,” in Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Composite Materials (ICCM '09), pp. 27–31, July 2009.

E. E. M. Ahmad and A. S. Luyt, “Morphology, thermal, and dynamic mechanical properties of poly(lactic acid)/sisal whisker nanocomposites,” Polymer Composites, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 1025–1032, 2012.

A. Campos, K. B. R. Teodoro, E. M. Teixeira et al., “Properties of thermoplastic starch and TPS/polycaprolactone blend reinforced with sisal whiskers using extrusion processing,” Polymer Engineering & Science, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 800–808, 2013.

M. E. Vallejos, A. A. S. Curvelo, E. M. Teixeira et al., “Composite materials of thermoplastic starch and fibers from the ethanol-water fractionation of bagasse,” Industrial Crops and Products, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 739–746, 2011.

L. Avérous and N. Boquillon, “Biocomposites based on plasticized starch: thermal and mechanical behaviours,” Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 111–122, 2004.

R. Belhassen, S. Boufi, F. Vilaseca et al., “Biocomposites based on Alfa fibers and starch-based biopolymer,” Polymers for Advanced Technologies, vol. 20, no. 12, pp. 1068–1075, 2009.

L. Avérous, C. Fringant, and L. Moro, “Plasticized starch-cellulose interactions in polysaccharide composites,” Polymer, vol. 42, no. 15, pp. 6565–6572, 2001.

A. A. S. Curvelo, A. J. F. De Carvalho, and J. A. M. Agnelli, “Thermoplastic starch-cellulosic fibers composites: preliminary results,” Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 183–188, 2001.

M. Wollerdorfer and H. Bader, “Influence of natural fibres on the mechanical properties of biodegradable polymers,” Industrial Crops and Products, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 105–112, 1998.

A. J. F. de Carvalho, A. A. S. Curvelo, and J. A. M. Agnelli, “Wood pulp reinforced thermoplastic starch composites,” International Journal of Polymeric Materials, vol. 51, no. 7, pp. 647–660, 2002.

M. N. Angles and A. Dufresne, “Plasticized starch/tuniein whiskers nanocomposites. 1. Structural analysis,” Macromolecules, vol. 33, no. 22, pp. 8344–8353, 2000.

M. N. Anglès and A. Dufresne, “Plasticized starch/tunicin whiskers nanocomposite materials. 2. Mechanical behavior,” Macromolecules, vol. 34, no. 9, pp. 2921–2931, 2001.

A. P. Mathew and A. Dufresne, “Morphological investigation of nanocomposites from sorbitol plasticized starch and tunicin whiskers,” Biomacromolecules, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 609–617, 2002.

H. Li and M. A. Huneault, “Comparison of sorbitol and glycerol as plasticizers for thermoplastic starch in TPS/PLA blends,” Journal of Applied Polymer Science, vol. 119, no. 4, pp. 2439–2448, 2011.

O. Martin and L. Avérous, “Poly(lactic acid): plasticization and properties of biodegradable multiphase systems,” Polymer, vol. 42, no. 14, pp. 6209–6219, 2001.

W. Jaafar, W. N. Raihan, S. Siti Norasmah et al., “Thermal properties of PLA/Kenaf green nanocomposite: effect of chemi-mechanical treatment,” Advanced Materials Research, vol. 576, pp. 342–344, 2012.

C. Way, D. Y. Wu, D. Cram, K. Dean, and E. Palombo, “Processing stability and biodegradation of polylactic Acid (PLA) composites reinforced with cotton linters or maple hardwood fibres,” Journal of Polymers and the Environment, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 54–70, 2013.