Effect of Acetate Group Content in Ethylene-Vinyl Acetate Copolymer on Properties of Composite Based on Low Density Polyethylene and Polyamide-6 Nhi

1Faculty of Environmental Technology, Viet Tri University of Industry, Tien Kien, LamThao, PhuTho, Vietnam, Vietnam 2Faculty of Biotechnology, Institute of Polymer of Kazan National Research Technological University, 68 Karla Marksa Street, Kazan, Republic of Tatarstan 420015, Russia 3Faculty of Biotechnology, Institute of Food Engineering and Biotechnology of Kazan National Research Technological University, 68 Karla Marksa Street, Kazan, Republic of Tatarstan 420015, Russia


Introduction
Plastic packaging has come to occupy an indispensable place in human life.It is difficult to imagine that at the beginning of the last century plastic products did not yet exist.The successful development of polymer packaging materials for long-term food storage has made conditional that they are a functional, lightweight, strong, cheap, and hygienic way to transport food.A substantial growth in the consumption of plastic packaging materials is contributed to a concern, the proper disposal of waste plastics.All over the world the packaging science is constantly looking for new ways to reduce packaging waste.Plastics in food packaging after using go to landfill.They make up 10-12% of total waste in landfills.Of these, polyethylene (PE) makes up about 38%, polyvinylchloride and its derivatives 15%, polypropylene 8%, and other plastics 39%.The time required for decomposition of such polymer materials under natural conditions is 20 to 300 years depending on type and the sizes of waste [1][2][3].
From the point of view of environmental safety and economic benefit, a mixture of nonbiodegradable synthetic polymers with a biodegradable polymer producing environmentally friendly polymers is an established technique to solve this problem [4].On the other hand, it was found that it is sometimes more desirable to mix polymers to combine several properties from each homopolymer of the blend [5].So most pairs of polymers are immiscible, when mixed together they form a two-phase.Weak physical or chemical interactions between the phases of the mixture are usually the cause of poor properties of blends.Improving the compatibility of the mixture is one of the main objectives of creation of polymeric compositions.Increasing interfacial adhesion between the phases is achieved by compatibilization through the introduction of physical or/and chemical interaction between the components [6,7].
In previous works [8][9][10] showed that ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymer (EVA) was used as compatibilizer to overcome the incompatibility for blend of low density polyethylene (LDPE) and polyamide (PA-6), which is well known as a biodegradable polymer [11][12][13].However, in these works the effect of the content of vinyl acetate groups on the properties of polymer composition was not studied.Addressing this issue is consecrated to our research.

Materials
The following materials were used.

FTIR Analysis.
The chemical structure of the polymer compositions can be evaluated using the FTIR spectroscopy ≪InfraLIOM FT-08≫.After the FTIR analysis LDPE/PA-6/EVA blend samples were purified using formic acid and hot orthoxylene as selective solvents.Blend samples were treated first with formic acid, and the insoluble fraction was separated by centrifugation of the suspensions, washed with the pure methanol, and dried to constant weight.The dried sample was extracted further by repeated treatments with hot orthoxylene to obtain orthoxylene soluble and orthoxylene insoluble fraction.The soluble and insoluble fractions were washed several times with pure acetone and then dried to constant weight.The dried insoluble products were used for measuring molecular weight.The purified insoluble products of LDPE functionalized and obtained blends were compression molded in thin films with a thickness of about 0.05 mm for FTIR analysis.

Morphological Analysis.
The surface chemical composition of polymers was studied by using intermittent-contact atomic force microscopy (IC-AFM) MultiMode V (Veeco) and the optical microscope VH-Z500R (Keyence Co., Japan).
2.4.5.Thermal Analysis.Differential scanning calorimetric (DSC) analysis was performed under nitrogen flow, at a scanning rate of 5 ∘ C/min using a DSC 1 STARe (Mettler Toledo, USA).Thermal stability of composites was evaluated using thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) on the instrument STA 6000 (PerkinElmer, USA) with the relaxation character at a heating rate 5 ∘ C/min up to 500 ∘ C. 2.4.6.Thermomechanical Analysis.Thermomechanical analysis (TMA) samples was done using TMA 402F (Netzsch-Geratebau GmbH, Germany).The experiment was carried out under nitrogen flow at a heating rate of 5 ∘ C/min.Heat resistance was evaluated softening temperature, which is determined by the response curves change of linear dimensions of the sample (%) versus temperature.

Assessment of Biodegradation.
The evaluations of the fungus resistance were performed by the growth intensity of fungus on the polymer film surface placed on solid media Czapek and were according to a 5-point scale ranging from zero to 100% fungal growth.Before being placed on solid culture medium, the polymer films were cut in size 5 × 7 cm
or 5 × 5 cm with thickness 0.2 ± 0.02 mm and washed with alcohol and then with distilled water.
The sample surface after biodegradation was studied by using atomic force microscopy (AFM).The microscopic studies on the morphology were conducted using phase contrast microscope (Leica DM 750) with the highest power objective lenses (i.e., 100x lens).
The physical-mechanical properties (elongation at break () and tensile strength at break ()) of the samples after degradation by microorganisms were measured using universal testing machine Inspekt mini 3 kN (Trilogica, Germany) at 20 ∘ C.
Viscosity average molecular weight (Mv) was determined by using an Ubbelohde capillary viscometer.The dried soluble samples were dissolved in orthoxylene in the range from 0.2 to 0.4 g/dL.

Results and Discussion
During the melt extrusion of recycled polymer blend (LDPE/PA-6) with EVA, the possible chemical interaction (H-bonding) can be expected between amine end groups (-NH) of PA-6 component and vinyl acetate groups of EVA.At the same time, a specific intermolecular interaction between polyethylene segments of EVA and those of the PE may also occur.The possible interactions between the polymer components of blend are proposed in Scheme 1 [10].
Polymeric composite containing 10 wt.% PA-6 has low physical-mechanical properties as compared with the control LDPE (Figures 1(a) and 1(b)).At the same time, MFI of the sample is reduced by four times (Figure 1(c)).It is due to the low thermal stability of the PA-6 and, as a consequence, degradation leading to cross-linking of matrix polymer.
As seen in Figure 1, the content of vinyl acetate groups in EVA has significant effect on properties of the polymer composite.The introduction of even 1 wt.%EVA type II to polymer blend leads to forming fully cross-linked composite that cannot processed by any methods.Physical-mechanical properties remain at the level of the polymer composite without compatibilizer.At the same time, the melting viscosity of composites, containing EVA type I, is reduced.
Physical-mechanical properties also increase.However, their values do not reach the control properties of LDPE.
Using stabilizer is a way to enhance degradation resistance of the polymer composition at high temperatures of processing.The previous research showed that the mixture of stabilizers of Agidol 40 and Irgafos 168 is the most effective stabilizer for a polymer composite based on LDPE and PA-6 [15].
The influence of type of EVA on properties of polymer composites based on LDPE and PA-6 in presence of a mixture of stabilizers of 0.1 wt.% of Agidol 40 and 0.1 wt.% Irgafos 168 is presented in Table 1.
As a result of using stabilizer the melting viscosity of the studied composites significantly reduced (Table 1).The more composite contains EVA, the lower it has the viscosity.Decrease in molecular weight of polymer during processing can be the reason of increase in MFI or decrease in the melting viscosity.Possibly, stabilizers change (alter) the mechanism of interaction with the free formed radicals during destruction.Without using stabilizers radicals interact with defective areas in macromolecule of LDPE and sew them.At the same time, presence of Agidol 40 and Irgafos 168 stabilize the polymer chain broken off during destruction.However, physical-mechanical properties of composites increase.It indicates an increase of physical and chemical interactions between the phases of the polymer mixture.
Thus, EVA containing less vinyl acetate groups 10-14 wt.% (type I) in the presence of a mixture of stabilizers Irgafos 168 and Agidol 40 has a positive compatibility effect on polymer composite than ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymer containing 21-30 wt.% vinyl acetate groups (type II).
Quantification of surface morphology of the samples was performed using IC-AFM (Figure 2).Comparison AFM images show that the samples containing PA-6 have a high surface roughness when compared to the initial LDPE.Using the EVA type 1 reduces the surface roughness from 410 nm to 180 nm.As a result PA-6 was uniform distribution in the matrix of LDPE.
IR spectrum of purified sample LDPE/PA-6/EVA, in addition to the absorption bands for LDPE, shows the absorption bands of PA-6 segments at 1638 cm −1 -stretching  vibrations of the C=O groups, 1544 cm −1 and 3297 cm −1 , deformation and stretching vibrations of NH-groups, respectively (Figure 3).However, in the spectrum of the polymer composite two bands at 1244 cm −1 and 610 cm −1 are assigned to the asymmetric and symmetric stretching of the carbonyl bond (C=O) of the grafted EVA.
The ability of the polymer product can maintain performance at elevated temperatures and is determined by heat resistance which characterizes the upper limit of operating temperatures.Figure 4 shows the TGA curves for the pure polymers and their composites.The presence of stabilizers in the polymer blend composite leads to increase their thermal stability and reduce the degradation rate compared with the pure polymers.As shown in Table 2, introduction of PA-6 (to 10 wt.%), EVA type 1, and in the presence of the mixture stabilizers with no effect on the melting and softening points of composite, the degree of crystallinity decreases.
Thus, EVA containing 10-14 wt.% of vinyl acetate groups and in presence of the mixture of stabilizers of Agidol  control sample LDPE is a zone of "alienation" with growth of micromycetes on a nutrient medium 5).The studied samples had signs of biological damage already in the initial stage of research, days (Table 3).Blend, containing 10 wt.% of and 1 wt.% of EVA, is most susceptible to on the surface of sample 30-60% of the coating covered by fungal growth after 28 of incubation.The control LDPE has no sign to biodegradation over the time of The micrographs in Figure 6 illustrate the of the film surface of polymer composition after biodegradation for 28 days.be figure, it is the absence of PA-6 in consisting of blend on the surface after biodegradation, which may be associated with its consumption of microbes source of nutrients.
As a result of biodegradation, the physical-mechanical properties of the samples decrease (Table 4).might be explained by fact that the action of microorganisms tends to the polymer Reduction in demonstrates the ability of the polymer composite to degrade the conditions of biological aging.As a result of that MFI and physical-mechanical properties of the polymer compositions enhance.The polymer composites of LDPE, PA-6, and EVA containing 10-14 wt.% vinyl acetate groups have the ability of biodegradation.It has shown signs of primary biodamage of samples on the 7th day of the experiment and after 28 of incubation 30 to 60% of the total area of surface of sample supports the growth of microorganisms.As a result of biodegradation physical-mechanical properties of the samples and their molecular weight reduce.

Figure 1 :Figure 2 :Figure 3 :
Figure 1: Estimation of the effect of different types EVA on the properties of the polymer composite of LDPE and PA-6: (A) control sample (LDPE); (B) polymer composite, containing EVA type I; (C) polymer composite, containing EVA type II.

Table 1 :
Influence of type of EVA on properties of polymer composite based on LDPE and PA-6 in presence of a mixture of stabilizers of 0.1 wt.% of Agidol 40 and 0.1 wt.% Irgafos 168.

Table 3 :
Assessment of biodeterioration of polymer blends for various incubation times where 0 point: lack the of sample; 1 point: traces of microorganisms (less than 10% of the coating covered by growth); insignificant growth (10% to 30% of the coating covered by fungal growth); 3 points: significant growth of microbial colonies (30-60% the coating covered fungal growth).
EVA containing 10-14 wt.% of acetate groups a positive compatibility effect on polymer composites based International Journal of Polymer Science 7

Table 4 :
Some characteristics of polymeric compositions before and after biodegradation for 28 days.Samples LDPE/PA-6/EVA type I (w/w)