International Journal of Surgical Oncology
Volume 2020 (2020), Article ID 9679385, 7 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/9679385

Research Article

Enabling Microparticle Imprinting to Achieve Penetration and Local Endurance in the Peritoneum via High-Intensity Ultrasound (HIUS) for the Treatment of Peritoneal Metastasis

Agata Mikolajczyk,¹ Tanja Khosrawipour,2,3 Alice Martino,² Joanna Kulas,¹ Marek Pieczka,¹ Maciej Zacharski,¹ Jakub Nicpon,⁴ and Veria Khosrawipour²

¹Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Wroclaw, Lower Silesia, Poland
²Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California Irvine (UCI), Orange, CA, USA
³Department of Surgery (A), University-Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, North-Rhine Westphalia, Germany
⁴The Center of Experimental Diagnostics and Innovative Biomedical Technology, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Wroclaw, Poland

Correspondence should be addressed to Maciej Zacharski; maciej.zacharski@upwr.edu.pl

Received 27 April 2020; Revised 6 July 2020; Accepted 11 August 2020; Published 25 August 2020

Academic Editor: Steven Curley

Copyright © 2020 Agata Mikolajczyk et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

Introduction. Micro- and nanoparticles, with their submicron size, the versatility of physical and chemical properties, and easily modifiable surface, are uniquely positioned to bypass the body’s clearing systems. Nonetheless, two main problems with micro- and nanoparticles arise which limit the intraperitoneal application. The study was performed to evaluate whether HIUS enables the imprinting of microparticles and, therefore, enhances penetration and local endurance in the peritoneum. Methods. High-intensity ultrasound (HIUS) at 20 kilohertz with an output power of 70 W was applied on peritoneal tissue samples from fresh postmortem swine for different time intervals. Before the HIUS application, the surface of the samples was covered with strontium aluminate microparticles before analysis via electron microscopy. In-tissue strontium aluminate penetration and particle distribution size were measured using fluorescence microscopy on frozen thin sections. Results. With increasing HIUS durations (1 versus 5 minutes), increasing strontium aluminate particles were detected in the peritoneum. HIUS leads to a particle selection process with enhancing predominantly the penetration of smaller particles whereas larger particles had a harder time penetrating the peritoneum. Smaller particles were detected up to 277 µm ± 86 µm into the peritoneum. Conclusion. Our data indicate that HIUS might be used as a method to prepare the peritoneal tissue for micro- and nanoparticles. Higher tissue penetration rates without the increase and longer local endurance of the applied substance could be reached. More studies need to be performed to analyze the effect of HIUS in enhancing intraperitoneal drug applications.

1. Introduction

Peritoneal metastasis (PM) is a common manifestation of advanced gastrointestinal and gynecological cancers. The cytostatics used for the treatment of PM do not remain in the abdominal cavity for prolonged periods of time and are instead quickly absorbed into the circulation due to the particularly small molecular weight of chemotherapeutics [1, 2]. For intraperitoneal administration, the ideal drug should remain active in the peritoneal cavity for an extended period of time. Additionally, systemic absorption and toxicity should be avoided. At the moment, most of the HIPEC, PIPAC, and other forms of intraperitoneal chemotherapies are accomplished using the intravenous formulation of chemotherapeutic agents. Classic intraperitoneal chemotherapy drugs are susceptible to rapid clearance, exhibit local toxicity, and have limited penetration depths [3]. Nanoparticles, with their submicron size, the versatility of physical and chemical properties, as well as easily modifiable surface, are uniquely positioned to bypass the body’s clearing systems. Nonetheless, two main problems with micro- and nanoparticles arise which limit the intraperitoneal application.

The first problem is that micro- and nanoparticles do not easily penetrate the peritoneal surface [4]. Fluid chemotherapy does penetrate the peritoneum by molecular movement according to Fick’s law of diffusion. Although it is known that the antitumor effect of intraperitoneal chemotherapy (IPC) is still strongly limited by the penetration of chemotherapy drugs less than 1 mm into peritoneal tissue [5, 6], there is at least some penetration into the target tissue.

However, micro- and nanoparticles are not subjected to forces of diffusion. These particles do not penetrate the peritoneal surface easily and thus are subject to drifting within the peritoneal cavity. Here, they accumulate on certain hotspots and do not distribute evenly within the peritoneal cavity [7–10]. The problem with micro- and nanoparticles is that although they are not subject to rapid clearance like traditional chemotherapy drugs, they have limited penetration into the peritoneum. Additionally, they do not evenly distribute within the peritoneum and, at present, are unable to target the peritoneal surface. Due to their relatively large size in comparison with molecular chemotherapeutic agents, they are not governed by the forces of diffusion, and, therefore, it cannot be guaranteed that micro- and nanoparticles will have substantial interaction with the peritoneum than traditional chemotherapeutic agents.

Manipulation of the chemical composition of these particles has been attempted with the intention of significantly increasing peritoneal residence time and prolonging the exposure to chemotherapeutic agents. This will also increase the local drug concentration, which is the primary goal of intraperitoneal chemotherapy [11]. Ideally, the drug will be driven deeper into the peritoneal surface, increasing the time it remains within the peritoneum to also increase the local drug concentration. We have termed this process “imprinting.” Our study will analyze if HIUS could be used to achieve “Imprinting” of solid micro- and nanoparticles into the deeper peritoneal tissue layer.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Peritoneal Tissue Model

The experiments were performed on commercially available tissue samples. Fresh postmortem swine peritoneum was purchased (local pork supplier, Zerniki Wielkie, Poland) and cut into proportional sections. Samples were then placed into Petri dishes, and NaCl 0.9% was added until the peritoneal surface was covered with 5 mm of liquid. Luminescent particles were purchased in the form of powder (strontium aluminate powder, Sigma-Aldrich/Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany). The strontium aluminate powder was further ground with mortar to ensure that no residual large SA particles remained. Part of these grounded particles was subject to electron microscopy for quality control and size measurements. As the strontium aluminate is not soluble in water, a suspension was generated. For that, 500 mg luminescent particles were suspended in 3 ml of physiological saline solution (0.9%).

200 μL of luminescent particle suspension was dropped with a Pasteur pipette on the peritoneal surface which was already covered by 5 mm of liquid. Next, high-intensity ultrasound (HIUS) was applied with a metal pen to the center of the peritoneal tissue using a sonicator (Sonoplus UW 2070, Bandelin, Berlin, Germany). The tip of the pen was within 3 mm of the tissue surface (Figure 1(a)). Samples were divided into three groups which were treated for 0, 60, and 300 seconds, respectively. Each treatment contained 0.3 seconds of active and 0.7 seconds of passive interval, with 20 kHz frequency, output power of 70 W, and 50% of amplitude.

(a)

(b)

Figure 1: (a) Model of a high-intensity ultrasound directed (HIUS) “imprinting” of solid particles on the peritoneal surface. (b) Size distribution of luminescent particles.

2.2. Microscopic Analysis

After treatments, all tissues were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen. Cryosections (10 µm) were prepared from different areas of each specimen. Sections were mounted with ProLong™ Gold Antifade Mountant (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) containing 1.5 µg/ml 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) to stain nuclei. The penetration depth of luminescence particles was measured using the Nikon Eclipse 80i fluorescence microscope (Nikon Instruments Europe B.V. Amsterdam, Netherlands). The distance between the luminal surface and the innermost positive staining for luminescence particles was measured and reported in micrometers.

2.3. Particle Detection on Scanning Electron Microscopy

A sample of the pestled luminescence surface particle was placed on a glass-probe and was analyzed via scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Samples were spotted on aluminum tables, then dried, dusted with carbon (15 nm), and placed in the scanning chamber electron microscope (Auriga 60, Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany). All samples were carried out at a beam voltage equal to 2 kV. The luminescence particles within three cubic areas of 0.04 mm² of the scans were subject to particle size measurements.

2.4. Ethical Approval and Regulations

Part of the experiments was performed on commercially available animal tissue samples. All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations which are applied according to the Polish law. Approval of the Local Board on Animal Care was obtained (Zapytanie 8/8/2019) according to Polish law.

2.5. Statistical Analyses

Experiments were independently performed three times. A total of eight tissue sections per tissue sample were subject to luminescence particle penetration measurement.

For evaluating the distribution of the particle sizes, a length of 200 µm of each tissue section (3 sections per sample) was subject to analyses. Prism 7.0 software (GraphPad, La Jolla, CA, USA) was utilized to analyze the data. Student’s t-test was used for the analyses of independent groups. A significant value was considered at .

3. Results

3.1. Electron Microscopy of Luminescence Particles

The electron microscopy analysis of the luminescence particles revealed a wide range of solid particle sizes. A total of 358 particles in the micrometer range were subject to size measurements. A large portion of the particles was around 20–40 µm (Figures 1(b) and 2(a)). Noticeably smaller particles (<10 µm) were subject to particle electrostatic forces which accumulated these particles to conglomerates and clusters (2B). Smaller particles below 10 µm were, therefore, not observed as free particles.

(a)

(b)

Figure 2: Electron microscopy analysis of solid luminescence particles (strontium aluminate). (a) Most particles’ sizes vary between <5 µm and 60 µm. (b) Particles smaller than 10 µm accumulate into clusters due to electrostatic effects and possibly temporarily disaggregate under high-intensity ultrasound.

3.2. Ex Vivo Experiment

HIUS was applied without complications. After applying HIUS, visual control of the sample was performed. However, after 300 seconds, some whitening and swelling of the peritoneum were noted. Luminescence particles were detected in fluorescence microscopy in all three groups. Microscopic analysis of the different tissue specimens showed a substantial difference in the penetration depth of the luminescence particles. Luminescence particles in the untreated samples remained on the peritoneal surface and followed the surface terrain. Tissue penetration levels after HIUS were 42 µm ± 21 µm (0 seconds), 92 µm ± 42 µm (60 seconds), and 277 µm ± 86 µm (300 seconds) (Figures 3 and 4(a)). Penetration increased significantly with longer HIUS duration (0 seconds versus 60 seconds () and 300 seconds ) (Figure 4(a)). 161 luminescent particles (lp) were detected after 1 min of HIUS (111 lp with <5 µm, 26 lp with 5–10 µm, 15 lp with 10–15 µm, 8 lp with 15–20 µm, and no lp were larger than 20 µm) whereas 198 particles were measured after 5 minutes (113 lp with <5 µm, 42 lp with 5–10 µm, 23 lp with 10–15 µm, 16 lp with 15–20 µm, and 6 lp > 20 µm) (Figure 4(b)). The number of particles penetrating the peritoneum increased with decreasing particle diameter (Figure 4(b)). In particular, particles less than 5 µm can be transported more easily through the barrier. More than 50% of particles that penetrated the peritoneum were less than 5 µm (Figure 4(b)) after 60 seconds and 300 seconds of HIUS. However, as the duration of HIUS increased (300 seconds), larger particles greater than 20 µm in size began to penetrate the peritoneum.

(a)

(b)

(c)

Figure 3: Microscopic analysis of the penetration depth of luminescence particles into fresh peritoneal samples of Polish large white breed pigs. Nuclei (blue) were stained with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) intense white signal corresponding to the luminescence particles. Location of luminescence particles after (a) 0 seconds, (b) 60 seconds, and (c) 300 seconds of high-intensity ultrasound.

(a)

(b)

Figure 4: Microscopic analysis of the penetration depth of luminescence particles into fresh peritoneal samples of Polish white breed pigs. (a) In-tissue penetration of luminescence particles after 0, 1, and 5 minutes. (b) Particle sizes detected in the peritoneal according to particle size after 1 minute (yellow) and 5 minutes (red).

4. Discussion

Despite much progress in the development of antitumoral particles, their therapeutic applicability has been low. These particles seem promising in the treatment of PM due to their high antitumor potency and high cytotoxicity. However, their use is currently limited by their distribution into the peritoneal cavity. These particles do not follow the same mechanics of standard liquid chemotherapeutic agents. Particles concentrate within different body compartments, organs, and tissues [12, 13]. This has been a significant problem in the application of these particles. For example, intraperitoneal application of more complex particles such as liposomal doxorubicin showed limited interaction with the surface and partial resorption [4, 14]. The application of HIUS might, therefore, be a way to improve particle distribution and absorption in the peritoneal cavity. Direct imprinting as demonstrated might be an opportunity to place and ensure the local endurances of these particles.

Our data indicates that the pretreatment of tissue samples with HIUS enhances solid particle imprinting into the peritoneal tissue. This manipulation increases the local endurance of particles that would otherwise be washed away or accumulate in other regions of the body. Furthermore, the increased penetration depth reached by this method could improve antitumoral efficiency against peritoneal metastasis development. HIUS pretreatment has the potential to be a new approach for many forms of IPC. Yet, further research needs to be conducted for a translation of this ex vivo method into clinical practice.

A method to achieve a solution for both decreased tissue penetration and nonuniform particle distribution may be a sort of quasi “Imprinting” of these particles into the peritoneal surface via high-intensity ultrasound (HIUS). This could solve the problem of limited penetration into the tissue by the relatively large particles in comparison to the molecular size chemotherapy. It would also prohibit the drifting of particles and, therefore, decreasing the accumulation of particles on hotspots. Also, the agglomeration state of nano- and microparticles might significantly interfere with the biological uptake [15, 16]. Although the current research has been focused predominantly on its interference with the cellular uptake [17, 18], there might also be significant interference in regard to biological surfaces. Although the forces in nanoparticle agglomeration are related to their surface energy, also known as Van-der Waals force [19], the particle agglomeration of solid microparticles is related to the electrostatic energy between them [20]. HIUS could be an option to overcome these forces easily and, therefore, increase particle interaction with the biological surface or possibly even greater cellular uptake of particles.

It remains unclear whether particles are actively pushed into the cavities or sediments are brought into motion by HIUS and tear formation. It is also possible that both mechanisms play a role in particle penetration. While recent data on the effects of HIUS on the peritoneum have been acquired, many technical aspects remain unclear. Another possible advantage of HIUS pretreatment is the reduced absorption of particles through the lymphatic pathway. We know that nano- and microparticles accumulate in the lymphatic system [21]. HIUS could also activate the particles itself to interact with the surrounding surface and release their chemical compounds as recently shown [13]. The possibility of using HIUS to improve drug penetration of fluid chemotherapy has already been demonstrated [22]. This effect is supposedly attributed to the morphological changes on the peritoneal surface and on the underlying tissue by HIUS [23]. However, our study did not evaluate particle clearance or in-tissue endurance. In contrast to molecules and smaller nanoparticles, solid particles >1 µm are barely affected by diffusion forces and Brownian motion [24–26].

5. Conclusion

HIUS could be a game-changer for micro- and nanoparticle IPC by improving the interaction of micro- and nanoparticles with the peritoneum. By increasing efficiency, local drug availability, and increased endurance of more complex particles in the peritoneal cavity, HIUS has the potential to significantly impact the utilization of micro- and nanoparticles in the treatment of PM. In combination with new drug formulas and concepts, HIUS could enhance the efficiency of local drug delivery exceptionally and improve well-known limitations of local drug applications like limited penetration, limited endurance, and limited local concentration.

Abbreviations

HIPEC: | Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy
HIUS: | High-intensity ultrasound
IPC: | Intraperitoneal chemotherapy.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author on request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Authors’ Contributions

Agata Mikolajczyk and Tanja Khosrawipour contributed equally contributed to this work. AM contributed to study design, laboratory analysis, and data acquisition. TK contributed to the supervision of the study, drafting, and critical revision for the important intellectual content of the manuscript; MA contributed to drafting and critical revision for the important intellectual content of the manuscript; JK contributed to study design, laboratory analysis, data acquisition, and manuscript drafting; MP contributed to data interpretation and critical revision for the important intellectual content of the manuscript; MZ contributed to study design and critical revision for the important intellectual content of the manuscript; JN contributed to drafting and critical revision for the important intellectual content of the manuscript; VK contributed to study design, data analysis, and manuscript drafting.

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by institutional funds.

References

M. F. Flessner, “The transport barrier in intraperitoneal therapy,” American Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology, vol. 288, no. 3, pp. F433–F442, 2005.

R. L. Dedrick and M. F. Flessner, “Pharmacokinetic problems in peritoneal drug administration: tissue penetration and surface exposure,” Journal of the National Cancer Institute, vol. 89, no. 7, pp. 480–487, 1997.

G. Los, E. M. E. Verdegaal, P. H. A. Mutsaers, and J. G. McVie, “Pentetration of carboplatin and cisplatin into rat peritoneal tumor nodules after intraperitoneal chemotherapy,” Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 159–165, 1991.

A. Mikolajczyk, V. Khosrawipour, J. Schubert et al., “Effect of liposomal doxorubicin in pressurized intra-peritoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC),” Journal of Cancer, vol. 9, no. 23, pp. 4301–4305, 2018.

R. L. Dedrick, C. E. Myers, P. M. Bungay, and V. T. DeVita, “Pharmacokinetic rational for the peritoneal drug administration in the treatment of ovarian cancer,” Cancer Treatment Reports, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 1978.

G. Los, P. H. Mutsaers, W. J. van der Vijgh, G. S. Baldew, P. W. de Graaf, and J. G. McVie, “Direct diffusion of cis-diamminedichloroplatinum(II) in intraperitoneal rat tumor after intraperitoneal chemotherapy: a comparison with systemic chemotherapy,” Cancer Research, vol. 49, pp. 3380–3384, 1989.

R. Liu, A. H. Colby, D. Gilmore et al., “Nanoparticle tumor localization, disruption of autophagosomal trafficking, and prolonged drug delivery improve survival in peritoneal mesothelioma,” Biomaterials, vol. 102, pp. 175–186, 2016.

S. Hallaj-Nezhadi, C. R. Dass, and F. Lotfipour, “Intraperitoneal delivery of nanoparticles for cancer gene therapy,” Future Oncology, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 59–68, 2013.

E. Salvatorelli, M. De Tursi, P. Menna et al., “Pharmacokinetics of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin administered by intraoperative hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy to patients with advanced ovarian cancer and peritoneal carcinomatosis,” Drug Metabolism and Disposition, vol. 40, no. 12, pp. 2365–2373, 2012.

A. Bellendorf, V. Khosrawipour, T. Khosrawipour et al., “Scintigraphic peritoneography reveals a non-uniform 99mTc-Pertechnetat aerosol distribution pattern for Pressurized Intra-Peritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) in a swine model,” Surgical Endoscopy, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 166–174, 2018.

P. H. Sugarbaker and O. A. Stuart, “Pharmacokinetics of the intraperitoneal nanoparticle pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in patients with peritoneal metastases,” European Journal of Surgical Oncology, vol. S0748–7983, no. 19, pp. 30380–4, 2019.

J. W. Nichols, Y. Sakurai, H. Harashima, and Y. H. Bae, “Nano-sized drug carriers: extravasation, intratumoral distribution, and their modeling,” Journal of Controlled Release, vol. 267, pp. 31–46, 2017.

J. P. M. Almeida, A. L. Chen, A. Foster, and R. Drezek, “In vivo biodistribution of nanoparticles,” Nanomedicine, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 815–835, 2011.

A. Mikolajczyk, V. Khosrawipour, J Kulas et al., “Release of doxorubicin from its liposomal coating via high intensity ultrasound,” Molecular and Clinical Oncology, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 483–487, 2019.

B. Halamoda-Kenzaoui, M. Ceridono, P. Urbán et al., “The agglomeration state of nanoparticles can influence the mechanism of their cellular internalisation,” Journal of Nanobiotechnology, vol. 15, no. 1, p. 48, 2017.

J. E. Skebo, C. M. Grabinski, A. M. Schrand, J. J. Schlager, and S. M. Hussain, “Assessment of metal nanoparticle agglomeration, uptake, and interaction using high-illuminating system,” International Journal of Toxicology, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 135–141, 2007.

A. Bruinink, J. Wang, and P. Wick, “Effect of particle agglomeration in nanotoxicology,” Archives of Toxicology, vol. 89, no. 5, pp. 659–675, 2015.

G. Pyrgiotakis, C. O. Blattmann, S. Pratsinis, and P. Demokritou, “Nanoparticle-nanoparticle interactions in biological media by atomic force microscopy,” Langmuir, vol. 29, no. 36, pp. 11385–11395, 2013.

H. C. Hamaker, “The London-van der waals attraction between spherical particles,” Physica, vol. 4, no. 10, pp. 1058–1072, 1937.

W. 1 Kaialy, “A review of factors affecting electrostatic charging of pharmaceuticals and adhesive mixtures for inhalation,” International Journal of Pharmaceutics, vol. 503, no. 1-2, pp. 262–276, 2016.

Y. Xie, T. R. Bagby, M. Cohen, and M. L. Forrest, “Drug delivery to the lymphatic system: importance in future cancer diagnosis and therapies,” Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery, vol. 6, no. 8, pp. 785–792, 2009.

V. Khosrawipour, S. Reinhard, A. Martino, T. Khosrawipour, M. Arafkas, and A. Mikolajczyk, “Increased tissue penetration of doxorubicin in pressurized intra-peritoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) after high intensity ultrasound (HIUS),” International Journal of Surgical Oncology, vol. 2019, Article ID 6185313, 2019.

A. Mikolajczyk, T. Khosrawipour, J Kulas et al., “The structural effect of high intensity ultrasound on peritoneal tissue: a potential vehicle for targeting peritoneal metastases,” BMC Cancer, vol. 20, no. 1, p. 481, 2020.

G. Metcalfe, M. F. M. Speetjens, D. R. Lester, and H. J. H. Clercx, “Beyond passive,” Advances in Applied Mechanics, vol. 45, pp. 109–188, 2012.

E. Van der Giessen and H. Aref, Advances in Applied Mechanics, Academic Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 1st edition, 2012.

P. Dolez, Nanoengineering, Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1st edition, 2015.