International Journal of Vascular MedicineVolume 2012 (2012), Article ID 750126, 12 pagesdoi:10.1155/2012/750126

Review Article

Targeting Endothelial Dysfunction in Vascular Complications Associated with Diabetes

Arpeeta Sharma,1,2 Pascal N. Bernatchez,² and Judy B. de Haan¹

¹Oxidative Stress Laboratory, Diabetic Complications Division, Baker IDI Heart and Diabetes Institute, P.O. Box 6492, St. Kilda Road Central, Melbourne, VIC 8008, Australia²The James Hogg Research Centre at St. Paul's Hospital and Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, V6Z 1Y6

Received 1 July 2011; Accepted 4 August 2011

Academic Editor: Matthew R. Spite

Copyright © 2012 Arpeeta Sharma et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

Cardiovascular complications associated with diabetes remain a significant health issue in westernized societies. Overwhelming evidence from clinical and laboratory investigations have demonstrated that these cardiovascular complications are initiated by a dysfunctional vascular endothelium. Indeed, endothelial dysfunction is one of the key events that occur during diabetes, leading to the acceleration of cardiovascular mortality and morbidity. In a diabetic milieu, endothelial dysfunction occurs as a result of attenuated production of endothelial derived nitric oxide (EDNO) and augmented levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS). Thus, in this review, we discuss novel therapeutic targets that either upregulate EDNO production or increase antioxidant enzyme capacity in an effort to limit oxidative stress and restore endothelial function. In particular, endogenous signaling molecules that positively modulate EDNO synthesis and mimetics of endogenous antioxidant enzymes will be highlighted. Consequently, manipulation of these unique targets, either alone or in combination, may represent a novel strategy to confer vascular protection, with the ultimate goal of improved outcomes for diabetes-associated vascular complications.

1. Introduction

Diabetes mellitus is a highly prevalent chronic metabolic disorder that is considered a major health problem in westernized societies [1–3]. Diabetes, characterized by persistent elevation of blood glucose levels (hyperglycaemia), occurs due to inadequate production of insulin (type 1 diabetes; T1D), or resistance to endogenous insulin usually associated with the metabolic syndrome and obesity (type 2 diabetes; T2D). Despite intensive glycaemic control, individuals with T1D and T2D are predisposed to developing vascular complications, which include cardiomyopathy, atherosclerosis, nephropathy, retinopathy, and neuropathy [4, 5]. Indeed, there is a striking correlation between the incidence of cardiovascular disease and mortality rates in diabetic patients [6, 7]. Although the mechanisms by which diabetes increases cardiovascular complications are incompletely understood, strong supportive evidence from experimental and clinical studies points to the impaired function of the vascular endothelium as a critical inducer of these cardiovascular complications [4, 8]. In the current review, we discuss the important role of the endothelium and the factors that contribute to diabetes-associated cardiovascular complications, in particular nitric oxide (NO) bioavailability and reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation. In addition, this review will highlight novel compounds or molecules that show promise in improving vascular function in diabetic settings.

2. The Protective Nature of the Vascular Endothelium

The vascular endothelium, comprised of a single layer of endothelial cells that line the lumen, was initially only considered as a physical barrier separating the circulating blood from the underlying tissue. However, over the past few decades, the versatile role of the endothelium in cardiovascular homeostasis has become more greatly appreciated. The vascular endothelium is responsible for maintaining vascular tone and blood pressure which is achieved by balancing the release of vasoconstrictors and vasodilators [9]. In addition, the vascular endothelium maintains blood fluidity by promoting anticoagulant, antiatherosclerotic and antithrombotic pathways [9]. Endothelial-derived nitric oxide (EDNO), a potent gaseous mediator released by endothelial cells, is widely accepted as the key determinant of endothelial function. Importantly, EDNO directly induces vascular smooth muscle relaxation by the activation of soluble guanylate cyclase and subsequent increase in cGMP [10], thereby contributing to resting vascular tone and blood pressure. EDNO is also considered an anti-atherogenic and antithrombotic molecule through its ability to inhibit platelet aggregation, inflammatory cell adhesion, and smooth muscle cell proliferation and migration [11]. Constitutively expressed endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) converts L-arginine to nitric oxide using molecular oxygen in the presence of its cofactors tetrahydrobiopterin (BH₄), heat shock protein 90 (hsp90), and calcium-calmodulin complex (Figure 1). Additionally, eNOS activity is significantly increased upon phosphorylation at serine 1177, mediated by the protein kinase B/Akt pathway [12]. Importantly, eNOS is only catalytically active upon dissociation from its endogenous binding protein, caveolin-1 (Cav-1) [13], which maintains eNOS in a tonic “inhibitory” state and will be discussed in greater detail below. Indeed, functional alterations in EDNO production or bioavailability play a critical role in the pathogenesis of various cardiovascular diseases [14]. Therefore, regulation and/or improvements in EDNO bioavailability are a major research focus to delineate novel drug targets aimed at improving endothelial function and cardiovascular disease (CVD) outcomes [15].

Figure 1: Under basal conditions, eNOS is kept in a “less active” state by binding to Cav-1. Activation of eNOS occurs by stimuli, (sheer stress, agonists such as acetylcholine, Ach), which causes an increase in intracellular Ca²⁺ and subsequent recruitment of cofactors and phosphorylation of the enzyme at S¹¹⁷⁷. Following which, eNOS is dissociated from Cav-1 and efficient EDNO production occurs. CaM: calmodulin; hsp90: heat shock protein 90.

3. Diabetes-Mediated Endothelial Dysfunction

Extensive clinical evidence has demonstrated that diabetic patients have attenuated EDNO-dependent vascular tone [16, 17]. The resultant endothelial dysfunction is an important precursor of diabetes-mediated vascular events and has emerged as an independent risk factor for diabetes-associated cardiovascular complications [18].

Diabetic vessels from murine models and various endothelial derived cells from vascular beds stimulated with high glucose, exhibit increased levels of ROS associated with attenuated EDNO levels [19–21] (Figure 2). It is now widely accepted that in the diabetic milieu, through upregulation of the NADPH oxidase (Nox) enzymes [20, 22], ROS such as superoxide are released in pathological amounts and contribute to the observed reductions in EDNO bioavailability [23]. In particular, superoxide rapidly inactivates EDNO forming deleterious peroxynitrite, which in turn oxidizes the essential eNOS co-factor, BH₄, thereby uncoupling the eNOS enzyme. Consequently, eNOS uncoupling diminishes the capacity of the enzyme to produce EDNO and causes a switch in production to superoxide, thereby further increasing superoxide levels [20]. The “eNOS uncoupling” phenomenon has gained an increasing amount of attention and is considered as one of the major sources of ROS production. Recently, it has been elucidated that in a prooxidative environment, eNOS is subjected to S-glutathionylation, an oxidative post-translational modification [24]. This modification occurs specifically at the cysteine 908 residue, thereby affecting the redox function of the enzyme and leading to an increase in superoxide production [24, 25]. Furthermore, eNOS S-glutathionylation is associated with impaired endothelium-dependent relaxation that is restored by thiol-specific reducing agents, which reverse the S-glutathionylation process, in hypertensive vessels [24].

Figure 2: Pathways activated during hyperglycaemia that limit eNOS function and subsequent NO production, leading to endothelial dysfunction and diabetes-associated vascular disease.

The enhanced superoxide generating activity of the Nox family of enzymes plays a key role in mediating oxidative stress and endothelial dysfunction. In the vasculature, the predominant isoforms of the multisubunit Nox enzyme are the Nox1, Nox2, and Nox4 isoforms and their regulatory subunits, including p22phox, p47phox, and Rac-1 [26]. In streptozotocin- (STZ-) induced murine models and db/db mice, which represent T1D and T2D respectively, it has been shown that the expression and activity of these Nox isoforms and their regulatory subunits are greatly upregulated in the aortic region and mesenteric vascular bed [22, 27–29]. Furthermore, this upregulation was associated with increased oxidative stress and attenuated eNOS expression and eNOS-derived EDNO [29, 30]. More recently, it was shown that the increased expression of the Nox catalytic subunits, in particular Nox2, is directly related to eNOS uncoupling and eNOS-derived superoxide production in carotid arteries of diabetic rats [31].

Another cellular signaling pathway that is altered in the presence of high glucose and contributes to endothelial dysfunction is the increased de novo synthesis of diacylglycerides (DAG) and the subsequent activation of protein kinase C (PKC) [32, 33]. Indeed, various vascular cells exposed to hyperglycaemic conditions, as well as tissues from diabetic animals, have shown a consistent activation of PKC, which in turn modulates ROS generation and is described extensively in the review by Yang et al. [33–35]. Finally, recent studies have shed light on the pivotal role of the RhoA/Rock pathway (to be discussed in more detail below), which plays a part in diabetes-associated endothelial dysfunction via modulation of eNOS and EDNO levels [21].

Collectively, these studies show that various pathways are altered in diabetes and that these alterations influence the balance between ROS and EDNO production. It is becoming increasingly clear that this balance between ROS and EDNO (Figure 2) is critical for vascular health, function and integrity in diabetes. Therefore, a major research focus of the past decade has been towards the improvement of vascular endothelial function via modulation of these pathways in order to limit or prevent vascular complications associated with diabetes.

4. Improving Endothelial Function: A Clinical Perspective

Several therapeutic interventions have been tested in patients with diabetes and cardiovascular disease in an effort to improve endothelial function. These therapeutic interventions, in particular statin therapy, ACE inhibition, and arginine supplementation, have shown some improvements in these disease settings. Statins, which were initially designed as lipid-lowering drugs, demonstrate lipid-independent effects such as partially restoring EDNO levels and decreasing oxidative stress in hypertensive and hypercholesterolaemic patients [48, 49]. These improvements occurred more rapidly than the decline in cholesterol levels [48], suggesting that one of the pleiotropic effects of statins is to enhance endothelial function by upregulating EDNO signaling. Furthermore, long-term ACE inhibition improved forearm blood flow, a marker of improved vascular function, in patients with coronary artery disease and T2D in response to acetylcholine [50, 51]. Indeed, it was shown that ACE inhibition attenuated the superoxide-generating effects of angiotensin II, impaired the breakdown of bradykinin, and increased the production of EDNO in patients with coronary artery disease [50]. In addition, L-arginine supplementation was able to restore diabetes-mediated endothelial-dependent vasodilation by augmenting cGMP production in diabetic settings where L-arginine stores were depleted [52]. Although these therapeutic strategies are showing promise in restoring vascular function in diabetic patients, it is likely that a more targeted approach focusing specifically on the mechanisms that contribute to diabetes-mediated endothelial dysfunction will ultimately yield more promising outcomes. This review will now focus on the mechanisms and novel compounds that specifically target eNOS signaling and the regulation of oxidative stress in the context of a diabetic setting.

5. Targeting eNOS Signaling and EDNO Production

eNOS is under constant regulation by various factors, including phosphorylation, transcriptional regulation, direct interaction with proteins, and substrate and co-factor availability. Furthermore, downstream effectors of various cellular signaling pathways, such as RhoA, are also capable of modulating eNOS function. In this section, we highlight the importance of BH₄ availability, transcriptional regulation, and the role of RhoA and Cav-1 in proper eNOS regulation and signaling in a diabetic context (see Table 1).

Table 1: Novel targets that regulate eNOS function.

Compound
Biological action
Disease context
References

BH₄
↑co-factor availability
Endothelium-dependent vasodilation, hypercholesterolemia, diabetes
[36–38]

GTPCH
↑BH₄ synthesis
Diabetes
[39, 40]

AVE9488
↑eNOS transcription
Atherosclerosis, ischemia-reperfusion injury
[41, 42]

AVE3085
↑eNOS transcription
Atherosclerosis, hypertension
[41, 43]

Fasudil
Stabilise eNOS gene expression, ↑eNOS activity
Atherosclerosis, hypertension, heart failure, diabetes
[44–47]

5.1. BH₄ Availability

BH₄ is a critical co-factor of eNOS regulation, facilitating electron transfer from its reductase domain to its oxygenase domain. For eNOS to be catalytically active, it must exist in its dimeric form. Indeed, BH₄ contributes significantly to the stability of the eNOS dimer [39]. Several reports have indicated that hyperglycaemia results in significant reductions in BH₄ levels, thereby “uncoupling” eNOS to its monomeric form and causing an increase in eNOS-derived superoxide [39, 40]. Furthermore, the diabetes-mediated increases in ROS levels, particular peroxynitrite, oxidizes BH₄ to its inactive form dihydrobiopterin (BH2) [36]. A recent study has shown that BH₄ oxidation is the key determinant for eNOS uncoupling and under conditions of low BH₄ bioavailability, eNOS uncoupling is suppressed through increased association of eNOS with Cav-1 [53].

A clinical study has shown that concomitant intra-arterial infusion of BH₄ in type 2 diabetic patients improved endothelium-dependent vasodilation, demonstrating the therapeutic potential of upregulating BH₄ bioavailability [37]. Furthermore, BH₄ supplementation improved endothelial function in vessels from animal models of hypercholesterolaemia and diabetes [36, 38]. The importance of BH₄ availability was further strengthened by studies overexpressing the rate limiting enzyme guanosine triphosphate-cyclohydrolase 1 (GTPCH) which is involved in de novo synthesis of BH₄ [39]. Adenoviral-mediated gene transfer of GTPCH in human endothelial cells exposed to high glucose conditions rescued eNOS function by increasing EDNO production and reducing superoxide levels as well as improving the stability of the eNOS dimer [39]. These results were corroborated in an in vivo transgenic GTPCH overexpressing mouse model of T2D, which exhibited markedly improved EDNO-dependent vascular tone, attenuated oxidative stress, and increased eNOS dimer to monomer ratio [40]. Thus, based on preclinical research and limited clinical data, augmentation of BH₄ levels in diabetic patients, appears to be a feasible strategy to restore impaired endothelial dysfunction.

5.2. Transcriptional Regulation of eNOS

Various physiological and pathophysiological stimuli are able to modify the transcriptional activity of the eNOS gene by inducing transcription or stabilizing steady-state eNOS mRNA levels [54]. Increased transcription of the enzyme in turn results in sustained activation of eNOS-dependent activities. For instance, sheer stress has been implicated in modulating eNOS mRNA stability while growth factors, such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), stimulate transcription of the eNOS gene [54]. Chemical library screening for compounds that stimulate eNOS transcription yielded two small molecular weight compounds, named AVE9488 and AVE3085, which have demonstrated the ability to increase EDNO production while concurrently up-regulating eNOS gene expression and reversal of eNOS uncoupling [41, 43]. In apolipoprotein-E- (ApoE-) deficient mice, AVE9488 and AVE3085 reduced cuff-induced neotima formation and atherosclerotic plaques, while atherosclerotic plaque formation was unaffected in ApoE/eNOS double knockout (KO) mice, indicating that the actions of these compounds are eNOS-specific [41]. Furthermore, AVE3085 improved endothelial-dependent vascular function and lowered blood pressure in spontaneously hypertensive rats [43], and AVE9488 exhibited cardioprotective effects against ischemia-reperfusion injury in an EDNO-dependent manner [42]. Although, these transcriptional regulatory compounds have not been tested directly in a diabetic context, their ability to ameliorate endothelial dysfunction in pathophysiological settings, such as hypertension and atherosclerosis, lends support for their therapeutic potential in diabetes-induced endothelial dysfunction.

5.3. Potential Role of RhoA

RhoA is a small GTPase protein involved in several aspects of cellular function including signal transduction cascades related to vascular inflammation. Amongst its many regulatory functions, activation of RhoA and its downstream target, Rho-associated kinase (ROCK), has been shown to downregulate eNOS gene expression by affecting eNOS mRNA stability and suppressing protein kinase B/Akt activation, thus reducing eNOS phosphorylation and catalytic activity [12]. Conversely, administration of the ROCK inhibitor, fasudil, increased protein kinase B/Akt activity and EDNO release in cultured endothelial cells [44]. Additionally, fasudil administration was protective against vascular-injury-induced leukocyte recruitment in wild type but not eNOS KO mice [44], confirming that one of the targets of this ROCK inhibitor is downstream eNOS-dependent activites. Importantly, from a diabetes perspective, studies have demonstrated a significant correlation between increased RhoA activity and impaired vascular function in experimental models of T1D and T2D [21, 55, 56]. Recently, it was shown that increased levels of ROS, in particular peroxynitrite, suppress eNOS activity in a RhoA/ROCK-dependent manner in STZ-induced diabetic rats [12, 21, 55, 56]. Furthermore, treatment with the peroxynitrite decomposition catalyst, FeTTPs, improved vasorelaxation to acetylcholine, lowered oxidative-stress and RhoA activity, upregulated eNOS expression, and improved EDNO levels [21]. It has also been shown that the RhoA/ROCK pathway is involved in the pathogenesis of diabetic retinal microvasculopathy by promoting leukocyte and neutrophil adhesion to the retinal vasculature, thereby contributing to endothelial damage [57].

Inhibitors of the RhoA/ROCK pathway are showing promise as potential regulators of vascular damage. Non-isoform specific ROCK inhibitors such as fasudil and Y-27632 protect against various cardiovascular diseases such as atherosclerosis, pulmonary and systemic hypertension and chronic heart failure in clinical and preclinical studies [45–47]. Mechanistically, Y-27632 has been able to prevent thrombin-mediated downregulation of eNOS gene expression in cultured endothelial cells [58]. More importantly, fasudil has a direct effect on endothelial function, as demonstrated by improved vascular resistance and forearm blood flow during intra-arterial infusion of the ROCK inhibitor [46]. In addition, intravitreal administration of fasudil significantly increased eNOS activation and decreased leukocyte adhesion in the retinas of diabetic rats [57]. Thus, the diverse range of benefits associated with inhibiting the RhoA/ROCK pathway have paved the way for the generation of newer ROCK inhibitors with higher specificity between ROCK isoforms [59]. Currently, only fasudil is approved for human use in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke [60]. The testing of fasudil and newer more specific second generation ROCK inhibitors in a diabetic setting would be of great interest in an effort to limit vascular complications.

5.4. Modulating eNOS with Caveolin-1

Cav-1 is the main structural protein of endothelial cell caveolae, which are highly dynamic invaginations of the plasma membrane known to play an integral role in cellular signal transduction events [14]. Various endothelial cell signaling molecules, including eNOS, localize in caveolae and are modulated by direct interaction with Cav-1 [61]. One of the most intriguing roles of endothelial Cav-1 is its negative regulation of eNOS [61, 62]. Cav-1 has been shown to directly bind eNOS and to inhibit eNOS-derived EDNO release under basal conditions (Figure 1) [63]. On the contrary, for optimal EDNO release, eNOS must reside in caveolae microdomains. This was clearly demonstrated by a reduction in EDNO release from HEK 293 cells stably transfected with palmitoylation-deficient mutants of eNOS, which lacked the ability of eNOS to target caveolae [64]. Therefore, eNOS is most catalytically active when present in caveolae microdomains and dissociated from the Cav-1 protein. Accumulating evidence now suggests that in cardiovascular disease, endothelial dysfunction occurs as a result of alterations in the caveolae/Cav-1 signaling pathway [15]. Supportive evidence for a role for Cav-1 in proper vascular regulation comes from studies involving Cav-1 KO animals, which demonstrate dysregulated eNOS synthesis, increased vascular permeability, cardiomyopathy, and pulmonary hypertension [65, 66], all of which are rescued upon reintroduction of Cav-1 back into the endothelium [66, 67].

From the above studies, it is clear that for optimal eNOS activity, the presence of dissociated eNOS from Cav-1 in functional caveolae is required. However, both reductions in Cav-1 as well as overexpression of Cav-1 have been shown to affect eNOS activity in diabetic settings. For example, in a study of moderately diabetic rats, kidney cortical eNOS dimer-to-monomer ratios and eNOS phosphorylation were reduced, thereby contributing to the attenuation of proper EDNO synthesis. Interestingly, eNOS colocalized with Cav-1 throughout the renal vascular endothelium, however, the amount of Cav-1 bound to the plasma membrane was significantly attenuated [68]. These data clearly suggest that the dynamics of membrane bound eNOS/Cav-1 has to be preserved for proper EDNO synthesis. More recently, it has been shown that impaired endothelium-dependent vasorelaxation is linked to increased Cav-1 protein expression in the aorta of diabetic rats. This was attributed to an inhibition of eNOS function due to Cav-1 binding and a reduction in EDNO production [68, 69]. Furthermore, in a diabetic setting, the interaction of Cav-1 with other pathways has also been invoked. For example, Cav-1 has been implicated in diabetic peripheral neuropathy through regulation of neural cell growth factor receptor Erb 2 signaling [70].

Although a definite role for Cav-1 in diabetes has not been fully elucidated, it is apparent that modulating eNOS function by Cav-1 could be beneficial in ameliorating diabetes mediated endothelial dysfunction. A major issue that has limited Cav-1 research to date is that genetic ablation of Cav-1 results in the loss of both caveolae and Cav-1 dependent signaling [65]. This makes segregation of the functional role of caveolae versus Cav-1 dependent signaling pathways problematic. Hence, a novel approach to target the eNOS/Cav-1 interaction in a regulated fashion is clearly warranted. Previous studies have shown that Cav-1 binding to and inhibition of eNOS is mediated by the putative Cav-1 scaffolding domain (amino acids 82–101) [61]. By performing alanine scanning of the Cav-1 scaffolding domain, we have determined the amino acids responsible for eNOS inhibition [63]. Mutation of the amino acids threonine 90, 91 (T90, T91) and in particular phenylalanine 92 (F92) to an alanine, failed not only to inhibit eNOS activity but also was able to increase eNOS-derived NO release. This occurred despite Cav-1 retaining the ability to bind to eNOS [63, 71]. Moreover, we have generated a cell-permeable Cav-1 peptide lacking the eNOS inhibitory domain. When this peptide was applied ex vivo to aortic rings isolated from wild-type mice, there was an 80% improvement in endothelial-dependent vasodilation as compared to the wild-type peptide, an effect that was abolished in eNOS KO mice. This clearly indicates that eNOS is a specific target for the mechanism of action of this peptide. Furthermore, blood pressure was reduced in vivo following an intraperitoneal injection of the peptide in a concentration dependent manner. Lastly, in endothelial cells, treatment with the peptide was able to decrease superoxide production as measured by the cytochrome c assay [71]. Thus, our group has established a more targeted approach to positively regulate eNOS function by Cav-1. This strategy has the potential to improve endothelial dysfunction by upregulating eNOS activity in diabetes and cardiovascular disease, both of which have impaired Cav-1/eNOS signaling. However, a limitation that must be taken into account, is that increasing EDNO levels in the presence of oxidative stress, could lead to the production of peroxynitrite and consequently nitrosylation of proteins, leading to further damage.

6. Targeting Oxidant and Antioxidant Pathways in Diabetes

The vascular system controls excess ROS through a diverse range of endogenously expressed antioxidant enzymes, thus limiting oxidative damage. Antioxidants serve to protect against oxidative damage by scavenging ROS and interfering with downstream signaling events mediated by ROS. However, in diabetes, the activity of vascular ROS-producing enzymes is increased, whilst antioxidant defences are altered or impaired, skewing the balance to a more prooxidative profile. In this section, we discuss a major ROS producing enzyme of the vasculature and two key vascular antioxidant enzymes known to play a role in the protection against endothelial dysfunction and cardiovascular disease induced by diabetes.

6.1. Nox Isoforms

Since the Nox family of enzymes is one of the primary sources of ROS in the vasculature, much interest has focused on ways to minimise ROS production without compromising the important role played by physiologically relevant concentrations of ROS [72]. Compounds that suppress Nox activity may therefore offer therapeutic benefits to ameliorate diabetic complications, in particular diabetes mediated endothelial dysfunction and atherosclerosis where Nox involvement is increasingly being appreciated [73]. Indeed, it has been suggested that inhibition of vascular smooth muscle-specific Nox1 may be an efficient strategy to suppress neointimal formation in the prevention of vascular complications associated with diabetes through the prevention of smooth muscle cell migration, proliferation and extracellular matrix production [74].

Several novel small-molecule and peptide inhibitors of the NOX enzymes have been developed and shown to have promise in experimental studies [75]. Indeed, treatment with the Nox inhibitor, apocynin, reversed the upregulation of Nox isoforms, increased eNOS function, and reduced endothelial dysfunction in STZ-induced and fructose-fed rats [29, 30]. Apocynin was also effective in improving vascular function induced by hyperglycaemia in a non-obese model of T2D [76]. Another novel Nox inhibitor, VAS2870, lowered superoxide formation in oxidized low-density-lipoprotein-treated endothelial cells [77]. A highly-specific Nox inhibitor, known as gp91 ds-tat, has been shown to interfere with Nox subunit assembly and subsequent activation of the enzyme. Although gp91 ds-tat has not been tested in a diabetes-specific setting, it has shown promise in a rat model of hypertension through its ability to decrease vascular ROS and endothelial dysfunction [78, 79].

Even though studies using Nox inhibitors have shown benefit, the issues of specificity, potency, and toxicity militate against any of the existing published compounds as candidates for drug development. For example, the mode of action of apocynin has been controversial and a matter of debate. Recent evidence has suggested that apocynin is nonselective in its mode of action as it also targets other enzymes such as Rho-kinase. Indeed, it is now believed to act as an antioxidant rather than a specific Nox inhibitor, as demonstrated in vascular endothelial and smooth muscle cells [80]. Thus, a more preferable strategy in the design of Nox-inhibitors would be the development of agents with isoform and target specificity. This strategy may be more beneficial considering the important signaling role provided by some of the Nox isoforms and the important protective role of Nox2 in the innate immune response.

6.2. Superoxide Dismutase

The superoxide dismutase (SOD) enzymes are involved in the removal of superoxide through its dismutation to oxygen and hydrogen peroxide. The SOD enzymes are therefore the first line of defence against increases in superoxide and for that reason are important regulators of ROS production (Figure 3) [81]. Of relevance to the vasculature, the SOD enzymes are also a key determinant of EDNO bioavailability since SOD competes with EDNO for superoxide in a diffusion-limited manner, thus attenuating the formation of peroxynitrite. In doing so, the SOD enzymes indirectly improve EDNO bioavailability [82]. Indeed, in mice with a genetic ablation of the cytosolic Cu/Zn-containing isoform, SOD1, endothelial dysfunction was associated with increased superoxide and peroxynitrite levels compared with wild type controls [83]. Furthermore, exogenously added SOD was able to partially restore endothelium-dependent vasodilation in an eNOS-dependent manner in SOD1 KO mice [83]. In addition, overexpressing the mitochondrial isoform, SOD2, specifically in the endothelium of STZ-induced diabetic mice, prevented diabetic retinopathy and superoxide-mediated oxidative stress [84]. These data clearly demonstrate the important role SOD plays in balancing oxidative stress through removal of superoxide and thereby maintaining EDNO levels.

Figure 3: Classic antioxidant pathways for the neutralization of ROS produced by hyperglycaemia in the cytoplasm and mitochondria of endothelial cells. : superoxide anion; : peroxynitrite; : nitrite; H₂O₂: hydrogen peroxide; : hydroxyl radicals; LOOH: lipid hydroperoxides; LOH: lipid alcohol; Nox: NADPH oxidase.

Studies assessing the level of antioxidant defence in diabetes are mostly in agreement that antioxidant capacity is compromised in the diabetic milieu. Indeed, lower SOD1 activity has been associated with both T1D and T2D patients [85–87] and with increased susceptibility to vascular disease in children with T1D [88]. However, paradoxically in one study of a rabbit model of diabetes, impaired vascular function was linked to increased SOD expression and augmented superoxide levels [89]. However, adenoviral ex vivo gene transfer of both SOD1 and SOD2 into these diabetic rabbits improved vascular function by decreasing superoxide levels, leading these authors to conclude that, despite the increase in endogenous SOD, it had been rendered functionally less active and therefore unable to cope with the elevated diabetes-mediated oxidative stress [89]. This was confirmed in human endothelial cells, where exposure to high glucose for 7 and 14 days increased SOD1 and SOD2 protein levels despite SOD activity declining, therefore stressing the need for functionally active SOD to protect against oxidative stress [90].

Cardiovascular clinical trials investigating the potential of exogenous antioxidants, such as vitamin C and E, to bolster antioxidant defences have failed to show a positive outcome with respect to CVD endpoints [91, 92]. This lack of improvement in cardiovascular outcomes has spawned the development of compounds that mimic endogenous antioxidant enzymes with greater cellular penetration, efficacy, and stability, in order to lower oxidative stress in disease settings. Indeed, administration of tempol, a cell-permeable SOD mimetic, has shown improvements in diabetes associated microvascular complications, such as nephropathy and retinopathy [93, 94]. In addition, tempol restored endothelial vasorelaxation in large conduit vessels of alloxan-induced diabetic rabbits [95]. MN40403, another highly specific nonpeptide SOD mimetic was able to reverse endothelial dysfunction ex vivo by targeting Nox-mediated superoxide production in aortae of ApoE-deficient mice [96].

Lastly, it is important to note that although SOD and SOD mimetics have displayed efficacy in experimental models of diabetes, their role in improving diabetic vascular complications remains controversial. This may be due to the fact that in pathological conditions, dismutation of superoxide by SOD is linked to excess production of hydrogen peroxide, another ROS known to cause irreversible endothelial damage and attenuate EDNO production [97]. Thus, the availability or concurrent addition of other antioxidants such as catalase, thioredoxins, peroxiredoxins, and glutathione peroxidases, which function to neutralize hydrogen peroxide and/or hydroxyl radicals, may prove to be a more effective therapy to combat oxidative stress [81].

6.3. GPx1: A Versatile Antioxidant Enzyme

Glutathione peroxidases (GPx) are a family of selenocysteine-containing enzymes that participate in the second step of the antioxidant pathway, which involves the neutralization of hydrogen peroxide to water (Figure 3) utilizing glutathione (GSH) as its substrate [81, 98]. GPx1 is the predominant isoform expressed in the cytosol and mitochondria. Under conditions of increased oxidative stress, a build-up of hydrogen peroxide favours the production of hydroxyl radicals through Fenton-type reactions, leading to the formation of lipid peroxides. The formation of lipid peroxides in turn damage cell membranes and contribute to the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis [99]. GPx1 is considered a multifaceted antioxidant enzyme in its ability to eliminate lipid peroxides, hydrogen peroxide [81] and reduce the potent peroxynitrite anion [81, 100] (Figure 3). Indeed, recent preclinical and clinical data have shown that GPx1 plays a critical role in protecting the cardiovascular system against oxidative stress [101, 102] with low levels of GPx1 activity acknowledged as an independent risk factor for cardiovascular events in patients with coronary artery disease [102].

The generation of GPx1 KO mice by our group [103] and others [104, 105] have specifically demonstrated the importance of GPx1 in protecting the vasculature against oxidative stress and vascular complications of diabetes [106]. Although deletion of GPx1 is nonlethal and GPx1 KO mice are fertile [81, 103], these mice have an enhanced oxidative stress profile and are more susceptible to endothelial dysfunction [107, 108]. Indeed, a 50% reduction of GPx1, as seen in heterozygous mice, is sufficient to impair endothelial function and cause significant abnormalities to the vasculature and cardiac structures [101, 108]. Furthermore, resistance arteries isolated from GPx1 KO mice displayed paradoxical vasoconstriction in response to bradykinin, a EDNO-dependent vasodilator, whilst their wild-type counterparts exhibited dose-dependent vasodilation [107]. These findings were accompanied by reduced levels of cGMP, a downstream signaling molecule of the EDNO pathway, with no change in eNOS expression within the aorta of GPx1 KO mice [107]. These findings are strongly suggestive that a deficiency in GPx1 contributes to the reduction in EDNO bioavailability. In support of this finding, Galasso et al. demonstrated impaired ischemia-induced angiogenesis, as well as a reduction in the number of endothelial progenitor cells in response to vascular endothelial growth factor stimulation in GPx1 KO mice, both processes known to be EDNO dependent [109]. In addition, GPx1 deficiency has been shown to accelerate angiotensin-II-mediated endothelial dysfunction, cardiac hypertrophy, and mean arterial blood pressure [110, 111].

Armed with this knowledge, our group was particularly interested in the role of Gpx1 in vascular complications associated with diabetes. In order to achieve these aims, we generated ApoE/GPx1 double KO (dKO) mice and rendered them diabetic using STZ, which proved to be a robust model for diabetes-associated atherosclerosis and nephropathy [106, 112]. In diabetic ApoE/GPx1 dKO mice, atherosclerotic lesions were significantly increased in all regions of the aorta and aortic sinuses compared with diabetic ApoE KO mice. The enhanced atherosclerosis was accompanied by an increase in proatherogenic inflammatory markers, such as VCAM-1 and Nox2, and the pro-fibrotic markers, CTGF and VEGF [106]. In the absence of GPx1, there was an upregulation in SOD 1 and catalase, however, this compensatory response was insufficient to protect the mice against oxidative stress-mediated damage, as quantified by the increased nitrotyrosine levels detected in ApoE/GPx1 dKO compared with ApoE KO counterparts [106]. Diabetic nephropathy, detected as increased albuminuria, creatinine clearance, mesangial expansion, oxidative stress, and fibrosis, was also significantly enhanced in diabetic ApoE/GPx1 dKO mice compared with diabetic ApoE KO controls [112]. Collectively, these studies implicate a major role for GPx1 in protecting the vasculature against hyperglycaemia-mediated oxidative stress, endothelial dysfunction, atherogenesis, and nephropathy.

Ebselen is a lipid-soluble seleno-organic compound, which mimics the activity of GPx1. Clinical studies have demonstrated that ebselen has neuroprotective effects in stroke patients, showing its suitability and safety for human usage. In addition, Ebselen has been extensively studied for its therapeutic potential in various experimental models of diabetes [112–115]. In a T2D rat model associated with metabolic syndrome, a reduction in endothelium-dependent vasodilation as well as EDNO production and angiogenic capacity was prevented by treatment with ebselen [115]. Additionally, we have shown that ebselen is protective against atherosclerosis in diabetic ApoE KO mice, which was associated with a decrease in oxidative stress markers and reduced expression of proatherogenic cellularity and mediators [113]. In endothelial cells, pretreatment with ebselen, diminished hydrogen-peroxide induced increases in inflammatory cytokines, such as TNF-α and NFkB, and attenuated the TNF-α-induced expression of endothelial cell adhesion molecules (VCAM-1 and ICAM-1) [113, 116]. Importantly, in our studies, ebselen was able to significantly improve diabetes-associated atherosclerosis and nephropathy in our ApoE/GPx1 dKO mice [112]. This finding was pivotal as it demonstrated that ebselen, a synthetic compound that mimics an endogenous antioxidant enzyme, is target specific and able to lessen the pathological consequences brought about by a deficiency in GPx1.

Currently, newer ebselen analogues with structural modifications, including a diselenide moiety, have been generated for their greater efficacy, potency, and their potential to behave in a superior fashion to ebselen in vivo. Indeed, thorough biochemical and kinetic analysis have proven that these analogues have a higher catalytic activity [117]. Most recently, Hort et al. have shown that daily treatment of hypercholesterolemic LDL receptor KO mice with diphenyl diselenide (0.1 mg/kg or 1 mg/kg) for 30 days, reduced atherosclerotic lesions, which was accompanied by improved vascular function, downregulation of proatherogenic genes, reduced infiltration of inflammatory cells, and lowered oxidative stress levels [118]. These findings are supported by our own unpublished observations with various other ebselen analogues designed for their improved activity, which have demonstrated their antiatherogenic potential in diabetic ApoE/GPx1 dKO mice. Accordingly, targeting GPx1 activity through the use of novel GPx1 mimetics is proving beneficial in various preclinical settings, providing a strong foundation for their translation into clinical trials.

7. Conclusion

It is now well accepted that proper regulation of endothelial function in diabetes is considerably impaired, leading to often fatal cardiovascular complications. EDNO bioavailability and oxidative stress are two separate but inter-linked determinants of vascular function that are both compromised in a diabetic setting. Hence, developing novel therapeutics to specifically improve EDNO bioavailability and reduce oxidative stress is a clearly desirable dual strategy to manage endothelial dysfunction. This review highlights the importance of developing new compounds that upregulate EDNO synthesis, target key vascular ROS-producing enzymes, and mimic endogenous antioxidants, a strategy that might prove clinically relevant in preventing the development and/or retarding the progression of diabetes associated vascular complications.

References

D. W. Dunstan, P. Z. Zimmet, T. A. Welborn et al., “The rising prevalence of diabetes and impaired glucose tolerance: the Australian diabetes, obesity and lifestyle study,” Diabetes Care, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 829–834, 2002.

K. M. V. Narayan, J. P. Boyle, T. J. Thompson, S. W. Sorensen, and D. F. Williamson, “Lifetime risk for diabetes mellitus in the United States,” JAMA, vol. 290, no. 14, pp. 1884–1890, 2003.

D. Thompson and A. M. Wolf, “The medical-care cost burden of obesity,” Obesity Reviews, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 189–197, 2001.

C. J. Lockhart, P. K. Hamilton, K. A. McVeigh, and G. E. McVeigh, “A cardiologist view of vascular disease in diabetes,” Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 279–292, 2008.

S. M. Grundy, I. J. Benjamin, G. L. Burke et al., “Diabetes and cardiovascular disease: a statement for healthcare professionals from the american heart association,” Circulation, vol. 100, no. 10, pp. 1134–1146, 1999.

E. Standl, B. Balletshofer, B. Dahl et al., “Predictors of 10-year macrovascular and overall mortality in patients with NIDDM: the Munich General Practitioner Project,” Diabetologia, vol. 39, no. 12, pp. 1540–1545, 1996.

M. T. Schram, P. J. Kostense, R. A. J. M. Van Dijk et al., “Diabetes, pulse pressure and cardiovascular mortality: the Hoorn Study,” Journal of Hypertension, vol. 20, no. 9, pp. 1743–1751, 2002.

F. Cosentino and T. F. Lüscher, “Endothelial dysfunction in diabetes mellitus,” Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology, vol. 32, supplement 3, pp. S54–S61, 1998.

H. Haller, “Endothelial function. General considerations,” Drugs, vol. 53, supplement 1, pp. 1–10, 1997.

R. F. Furchgott and J. V. Zawadzki, “The obligatory role of endothelial cells in the relaxation of arterial smooth muscle by acetylcholine,” Nature, vol. 288, no. 5789, pp. 373–376, 1980.

D. M. Lloyd-Jones and K. D. Bloch, “The vascular biology of nitric oxide and its role in atherogenesis,” Annual Review of Medicine, vol. 47, pp. 365–375, 1996.

X. F. Ming, H. Viswambharan, C. Barandier et al., “Rho GTPase/Rho kinase negatively regulates endothelial nitric oxide synthase phosphorylation through the inhibition of protein kinase B/Akt in human endothelial cells,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, vol. 22, no. 24, pp. 8467–8477, 2002.

W. K. Alderton, C. E. Cooper, R. G. Knowles, et al., “Nitric oxide synthases: structure, function and inhibition,” Biochemical Journal, vol. 357, no. 3, pp. 593–615, 2001.

A. Sharma, C. Yu, and P. N. Bernatchez, “New insights into caveolae, caveolins and endothelial function,” The Canadian Journal of Cardiology, vol. 26, supplement A, pp. 5A–8A, 2010.

Y. Xu, H. Buikema, W. H. van Gilst, and R. H. Henning, “Caveolae and endothelial dysfunction: filling the caves in cardiovascular disease,” European Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 585, no. 2-3, pp. 256–260, 2008.

G. E. McVeigh, G. M. Brennan, G. D. Johnston et al., “Impaired endothelium-dependent and independent vasodilation in patients with Type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus,” Diabetologia, vol. 35, no. 8, pp. 771–776, 1992.

M. Huszka, M. Kaplar, L. Rejto et al., “The association of reduced endothelium derived relaxing factor-no production with endothelial damage and increased in vivo platelet activation in patients with diabetes mellitus,” Thrombosis Research, vol. 86, no. 2, pp. 173–180, 1997.

C. P. Tiefenbacher and J. Kreuzer, “Nitric oxide-mediated endothelial dysfunction—is there need to treat?” Current Vascular Pharmacology, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 123–133, 2003.

F. Cosentino, K. Hishikawa, Z. S. Katusic, and T. F. Lüscher, “High glucose increases nitric oxide synthase expression and superoxide anion generation in human aortic endothelial cells,” Circulation, vol. 96, no. 1, pp. 25–28, 1997.

H. Ding, M. Aljofan, and C. R. Triggle, “Oxidative stress and increased eNOS and NADPH oxidase expression in mouse microvessel endothelial cells,” Journal of Cellular Physiology, vol. 212, no. 3, pp. 682–689, 2007.

A. B. El-Remessy, H. E. Tawfik, S. Matragoon, B. Pillai, R. B. Caldwell, and R. W. Caldwell, “Peroxynitrite mediates diabetes-induced endothelial dysfunction: possible role of Rho kinase activation,” Experimental Diabetes Research, vol. 2010, Article ID 247861, 9 pages, 2010.

H. Ding, M. Hashem, and C. Triggle, “Increased oxidative stress in the streptozotocin-induced diabetic apoE-deficient mouse: changes in expression of NADPH oxidase subunits and eNOS,” European Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 561, no. 1–3, pp. 121–128, 2007.

F. Giacco and M. Brownlee, “Oxidative stress and diabetic complications,” Circulation Research, vol. 107, no. 9, pp. 1058–1070, 2010.

C. A. Chen, T. Y. Wang, S. Varadharaj et al., “S-glutathionylation uncouples eNOS and regulates its cellular and vascular function,” Nature, vol. 468, no. 7327, pp. 1115–1120, 2010.

C. A. Chen, et al., “Superoxide induces eNOS protein Thiyl radical formation: a novel mechanism regulating eNOS function and coupling,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 286, no. 33, pp. 29098–29107, 2011.

A. C. Cave, A. C. Brewer, A. Narayanapanicker et al., “NADPH oxidases in cardiovascular health and disease,” Antioxidants and Redox Signaling, vol. 8, no. 5-6, pp. 691–728, 2006.

M. C. Wendt, A. Daiber, A. L. Kleschyov et al., “Differential effects of diabetes on the expression of the gp91 phox homologues nox1 and nox4,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 381–391, 2005.

X. Gao, H. Zhang, A. M. Schmidt, and C. Zhang, “AGE/RAGE produces endothelial dysfunction in coronary arterioles in Type 2 diabetic mice,” American Journal of Physiology, vol. 295, no. 2, pp. H491–H498, 2008.

M. Olukman, C. E. Orhan, F. G. Çelenk, and S. Ülker, “Apocynin restores endothelial dysfunction in streptozotocin diabetic rats through regulation of nitric oxide synthase and NADPH oxidase expressions,” Journal of Diabetes and Its Complications, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 415–423, 2010.

B. Unger and B. Patil, “Apocynin improves endothelial function and prevents the development of hypertension in fructose fed rat,” Indian Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 208–212, 2009.

C. H. Leo, A. Joshi, and O. L. Woodman, “Short-term type 1 diabetes alters the mechanism of endothelium-dependent relaxation in the rat carotid artery,” American Journal of Physiology, vol. 299, no. 2, pp. H502–H511, 2010.

A. Hempel, C. Maasch, U. Heintze et al., “High glucose concentrations increase endothelial cell permeability via activation of protein kinase Cα,” Circulation Research, vol. 81, no. 3, pp. 363–371, 1997.

T. Inoguchi, T. Sonta, H. Tsubouchi et al., “Protein kinase C-dependent increase in reactive oxygen species (ROS) production in vascular tissues of diabetes: role of vascular NAD(P)H oxidase,” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. S227–S232, 2003.

T. Inoguchi, P. Li, F. Umeda et al., “High glucose level and free fatty acid stimulate reactive oxygen species production through protein kinase C-dependent activation of NAD(P)H oxidase in cultured vascular cells,” Diabetes, vol. 49, no. 11, pp. 1939–1945, 2000.

G. Yang, R. Lucas, R. Caldwell, L. Yao, M. Romero, and R. Caldwell, “Novel mechanisms of endothelial dysfunction in diabetes,” Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 59–63, 2010.

J. Vasquez-Vivar, P. Martasek, J. Whitsett, J. Joseph, and B. Kalyanaraman, “The ratio between tetrahydrobiopterin and oxidized tetrahydrobiopterin analogues controls superoxide release from endothelial nitric oxide synthase: an EPR spin trapping study,” Biochemical Journal, vol. 362, no. 3, pp. 733–739, 2002.

T. Heitzer, K. Krohn, S. Albers, and T. Meinertz, “Tetrahydrobiopterin improves endothelium-dependent vasodilation by increasing nitric oxide activity in patients with Type II diabetes mellitus,” Diabetologia, vol. 43, no. 11, pp. 1435–1438, 2000.

N. J. Alp and K. M. Channon, “Regulation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase by tetrahydrobiopterin in vascular disease,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 413–420, 2004.

S. Cai, J. Khoo, and K. M. Channon, “Augmented BH₄ by gene transfer restores nitric oxide synthase function in hyperglycemic human endothelial cells,” Cardiovascular Research, vol. 65, no. 4, pp. 823–831, 2005.

N. J. Alp, S. Mussa, J. Khoo et al., “Tetrahydrobiopterin-dependent preservation of nitric oxide-mediated endothelial function in diabetes by targeted transgenic GTP-cyclohydrolase I overexpression,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 112, no. 5, pp. 725–735, 2003.

P. Wohlfart, H. Xu, A. Endlich et al., “Antiatherosclerotic effects of small-molecular-weight compounds enhancing endothelial nitric-oxide synthase (eNOS) expression and preventing eNOS uncoupling,” Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, vol. 325, no. 2, pp. 370–379, 2008.

S. Frantz, A. Adamek, D. Fraccarollo et al., “The eNOS enhancer AVE 9488: a novel cardioprotectant against ischemia reperfusion injury,” Basic Research in Cardiology, vol. 104, no. 6, pp. 773–779, 2009.

Q. Yang, H.-M. Xue, W.-T. Wong et al., “AVE3085, an enhancer of endothelial nitric oxide synthase, restores endothelial function and reduces blood pressure in spontaneously hypertensive rats,” British Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 163, no. 5, pp. 1078–1085, 2011.

S. Wolfrum, A. Dendorfer, Y. Rikitake et al., “Inhibition of Rho-kinase leads to rapid activation of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/protein kinase Akt and cardiovascular protection,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 24, no. 10, pp. 1842–1847, 2004.

Z. Mallat, A. Gojova, V. Sauzeau et al., “Rho-associated protein kinase contributes to early atherosclerotic lesion formation in mice,” Circulation Research, vol. 93, no. 9, pp. 884–888, 2003.

T. Kishi, Y. Hirooka, A. Masumoto et al., “Rho-kinase inhibitor improves increased vascular resistance and impaired vasodilation of the forearm in patients with heart failure,” Circulation, vol. 111, no. 21, pp. 2741–2747, 2005.

Y. Fukumoto, T. Matoba, A. Ito et al., “Acute vasodilator effects of a Rho-kinase inhibitor, fasudil, in patients with severe pulmonary hypertension,” Heart, vol. 91, no. 3, pp. 391–392, 2005.

S. John, M. P. Schneider, C. Delles, J. Jacobi, and R. E. Schmieder, “Lipid-independent effects of statins on endothelial function and bioavailability of nitric oxide in hypercholesterolemic patients,” American Heart Journal, vol. 149, no. 3, article 473, 2005.

J. I. Osende, M. Ruiz-Ortega, L. M. Blanco-Colio, and J. Egido, “Statins to prevent cardiovascular events in hypertensive patients. The ASCOT-LLA study,” Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 528–531, 2004.

G. B. J. Mancini, G. C. Henry, C. Macaya et al., “Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition with quinapril improves endothelial vasomotor dysfunction in patients with coronary artery disease: the TREND (Trial on Reversing ENdothelial Dysfunction) study,” Circulation, vol. 94, no. 3, pp. 258–265, 1996.

G. O'Driscoll, D. Green, A. Maiorana, K. Stanton, F. Colreavy, and R. Taylor, “Improvement in endothelial function by angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 1506–1511, 1999.

G. M. Pieper and L. A. Dondlinger, “Plasma and vascular tissue arginine are decreased in diabetes: acute arginine supplementation restores endothelium-dependent relaxation by augmenting cGMP production,” Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, vol. 283, no. 2, pp. 684–691, 1997.

K. Karuppiah, et al., “Suppression of eNOS-derived superoxide by caveolin-1: a biopterin-dependent mechanism,” American Journal of Physiology, vol. 301, no. 3, pp. H903–H911, 2011.

C. D. Searles, “Transcriptional and posttranscriptional regulation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase expression,” American Journal of Physiology, vol. 291, no. 5, pp. C803–C816, 2006.

Z. Xie, W. Su, Z. Guo, H. Pang, S. R. Post, and M. C. Gong, “Up-regulation of CPI-17 phosphorylation in diabetic vasculature and high glucose cultured vascular smooth muscle cells,” Cardiovascular Research, vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 491–501, 2006.

T. K. Ali, M. M. H. Al-Gayyar, S. Matragoon et al., “Diabetes-induced peroxynitrite impairs the balance of pro-nerve growth factor and nerve growth factor, and causes neurovascular injury,” Diabetologia, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 657–668, 2011.

R. Arita, Y. Hata, S. Nakao et al., “Rho kinase inhibition by fasudil ameliorates diabetes-induced microvascular damage,” Diabetes, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 215–226, 2009.

M. Eto, C. Barandiér, L. Rathgeb et al., “Thrombin suppresses endothelial nitric oxide synthase and upregulates endothelin-converting enzyme-1 expression by distinct pathways: role of Rho/ROCK and mitogen-activated protein kinase,” Circulation Research, vol. 89, no. 7, pp. 583–590, 2001.

K. M. D. Satoh, Y. Fukumoto, and H. Shimokawa, “Rho-kinase: important new therapeutic target in cardiovascular diseases,” American Journal of Physiology, vol. 301, no. 2, pp. H287–H296, 2011.

H. Ying, S. L. Biroc, W. W. Li et al., “The Rho kinase inhibitor fasudil inhibits tumor progression in human and rat tumor models,” Molecular Cancer Therapeutics, vol. 5, no. 9, pp. 2158–2164, 2006.

G. García-Cardeña, P. Martasek, B. S. S. Masters et al., “Dissecting the interaction between nitric oxide synthase (NOS) and caveolin. Functional significance of the nos caveolin binding domain in vivo,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 272, no. 41, pp. 25437–25440, 1997.

H. Ju, R. Zou, V. J. Venema, and R. C. Venema, “Direct interaction of endothelial nitric-oxide synthase and caveolin-1 inhibits synthase activity,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 272, no. 30, pp. 18522–18525, 1997.

P. N. Bernatcher, P. M. Bauer, J. Yu, J. S. Prendergast, P. He, and W. C. Sessa, “Dissecting the molecular control of endothelial NO synthase by caveolin-1 using cell-permeable peptides,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 102, no. 3, pp. 761–766, 2005.

J. Liu, G. García-Cardeña, and W. C. Sessa, “Palmitoylation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase is necessary for optimal stimulated release of nitric oxide: implications for caveolae localization,” Biochemistry, vol. 35, no. 41, pp. 13277–13281, 1996.

Y. Y. Zhao, Y. Liu, R. V. Stan et al., “Defects in caveolin-1 cause dilated cardiomyopathy and pulmonary hypertension in knockout mice,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 99, no. 17, pp. 11375–11380, 2002.

P. M. Bauer, J. Yu, Y. Chen et al., “Endothelial-specific expression of caveolin-1 impairs microvascular permeability and angiogenesis,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 102, no. 1, pp. 204–209, 2005.

T. Murata, M. I. Lin, Y. Huang et al., “Reexpression of caveolin-1 in endothelium rescues the vascular, cardiac, and pulmonary defects in global caveolin-1 knockout mice,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 204, no. 10, pp. 2373–2382, 2007.

K. H. Elcioğlu, L. Kabasakal, Ş. Çetinel, G. Conturk, S. F. Sezen, and G. Ayanoğlu-Dülger, “Changes in caveolin-1 expression and vasoreactivity in the aorta and corpus cavernosum of fructose and streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats,” European Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 642, no. 1–3, pp. 113–120, 2010.

E. N. Zeydanli, H. B. Kandilci, and B. Turan, “Doxycycline ameliorates vascular endothelial and contractile dysfunction in the thoracic aorta of diabetic rats,” Cardiovascular Toxicology, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 134–147, 2011.

J. F. McGuire, S. Rouen, E. Siegfreid, D. E. Wright, and R. T. Dobrowsky, “Caveolin-1 and altered neuregulin signaling contribute to the pathophysiological progression of diabetic peripheral neuropathy,” Diabetes, vol. 58, no. 11, pp. 2677–2686, 2009.

P. N. Bernatchez, et al., “A non-inhibitory mutant of the caveolin-1 scaffolding domain enhances eNOS-derived NO synthesis and vasodilation in mice,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 121, no. 93, pp. 3747–3755, 2011.

K. Bedard and K. H. Krause, “The NOX family of ROS-generating NADPH oxidases: physiology and pathophysiology,” Physiological Reviews, vol. 87, no. 1, pp. 245–313, 2007.

T. Kakehi and C. Yabe-Nishimura, “NOX enzymes and diabetic complications,” Seminars in Immunopathology, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 301–314, 2008.

M. Y. Lee, A. S. Martin, P. K. Mehta et al., “Mechanisms of vascular smooth muscle NADPH oxidase 1 (Nox1) contribution to injury-induced neointimal formation,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 480–487, 2009.

J. B. de Haan and M. E. Cooper, “Targeted antioxidant therapies in hyperglycemia-mediated endothelial dysfunction,” Frontiers in Bioscience, vol. 3, pp. 709–729, 2011.

S. Gupte, N. Labinskyy, R. Gupte, A. Csiszar, Z. Ungvari, and J. G. Edwards, “Role of NAD(P)H oxidase in superoxide generation and endothelial dysfunction in Goto-Kakizaki (GK) rats as a model of nonobese NIDDM,” PLoS One, vol. 5, no. 7, Article ID e11800, 2010.

C. Stielow, R. A. Catar, G. Muller et al., “Novel Nox inhibitor of oxLDL-induced reactive oxygen species formation in human endothelial cells,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 344, no. 1, pp. 200–205, 2006.

F. E. Rey, M. E. Cifuentes, A. Kiarash, M. T. Quinn, and P. J. Pagano, “Novel competitive inhibitor of NAD(P)H oxidase assembly attenuates vascular O2- and systolic blood pressure in mice,” Circulation Research, vol. 89, no. 5, pp. 408–414, 2001.

M. S. Zhou, I. H. Schulman, P. J. Pagano, E. A. Jaimes, and L. Raij, “Reduced NAD(P)H oxidase in low renin hypertension: link among angiotensin II, atherogenesis, and blood pressure,” Hypertension, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 81–86, 2006.

S. Heumüller, S. Wind, E. Barbosa-Sicard et al., “Apocynin is not an inhibitor of vascular NADPH oxidases but an antioxidant,” Hypertension, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 211–217, 2008.

J. B. de Haan, P. J. Crack, N. Flentjar, R. C. Iannello, P. J. Hertzog, and I. Kola, “An imbalance in antioxidant defense aftfects cellular function: the pathophysiological consequences of a reduction in antioxidant defense in the glutathione peroxidase-1 (Gpx1) knockout mouse,” Redox Report, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 69–79, 2003.

M. D. Chávez, N. Lakshmanan, and M. Kavdia, “Impact of superoxide dismutase on nitric oxide and peroxynitrite levels in the microcirculation—a computational model,” in Proceedings of the 29th Annual International Conference of IEEE-EMBS, Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC '07), pp. 1022–1026, August 2007.

C. L. M. Cooke and S. T. Davidge, “Endothelial-dependent vasodilation is reduced in mesenteric arteries from superoxide dismutase knockout mice,” Cardiovascular Research, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 635–642, 2003.

H. Goto, T. Nishikawa, K. Sonoda et al., “Endothelial MnSOD overexpression prevents retinal VEGF expression in diabetic mice,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 366, no. 3, pp. 814–820, 2008.

S. R. J. Maxwell, H. Thomason, D. Sandler et al., “Antioxidant status in patients with uncomplicated insulin-dependent and non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus,” European Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 484–490, 1997.

K. Uchimura, A. Nagasaka, R. Hayashi et al., “Changes in superoxide dismutase activities and concentrations and myeloperoxidase activities in leukocytes from patients with diabetes mellitus,” Journal of Diabetes and its Complications, vol. 13, no. 5-6, pp. 264–270, 1999.

E. C. Opara, E. Abdel-Rahman, S. Soliman et al., “Depletion of total antioxidant capacity in type 2 diabetes,” Metabolism, vol. 48, no. 11, pp. 1414–1417, 1999.

B. Suys, L. O. De Beeck, R. Rooman et al., “Impact of oxidative stress on the endothelial dysfunction of children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus: protection by superoxide dismutase?” Pediatric Research, vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 456–461, 2007.

M. Zanetti, J. Sato, Z. S. Katusic, and T. O'Brien, “Gene transfer of superoxide dismutase isoforms reverses endothelial dysfunction in diabetic rabbit aorta,” American Journal of Physiology, vol. 280, no. 6, pp. H2516–H2523, 2001.

A. Ceriello, P. Dello Russo, P. Amstad, and P. Cerutti, “High glucose induces antioxidant enzymes in human endothelial cells in culture; Evidence linking hyperglycemia and oxidative stress,” Diabetes, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 471–477, 1996.

I. M. Lee, N. R. Cook, J. M. Gaziano et al., “Vitamin E in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease and cancer. The women's health study: a randomized controlled trial,” JAMA, vol. 294, no. 1, pp. 56–65, 2005.

M. Sheikh-Ali, J. M. Chehade, and A. D. Mooradian, “The antioxidant paradox in diabetes mellitus,” American Journal of Therapeutics, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 266–278, 2011.

F. R. DeRubertis, P. A. Craven, and M. F. Melhem, “Acceleration of diabetic renal injury in the superoxide dismutase knockout mouse: effects of tempol,” Metabolism, vol. 56, no. 9, pp. 1256–1264, 2007.

M. A. Rosales, K. C. Silva, J. B. Lopes de Faria, and J. M. Lopes de Faria, “Exogenous SOD mimetic tempol ameliorates the early retinal changes reestablishing the redox status in diabetic hypertensive rats,” Investigative Ophthalmology &amp; Visual Science, vol. 51, no. 8, pp. 4327–4336, 2010.

C. G. Schnackenberg and C. S. Wilcox, “The SOD mimetic tempol restores vasodilation in afferent arterioles of experimental diabetes,” Kidney International, vol. 59, no. 5, pp. 1859–1864, 2001.

D. S. Weber and K. K. Griendling, “The Yin/Yang of superoxide dismutase mimetics: potential cardiovascular therapies?” British Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 139, no. 6, pp. 1059–1060, 2003.

P. K. Witting, B. S. Rayner, B. J. Wu, N. A. Ellis, and R. Stocker, “Hydrogen peroxide promotes endothelial dysfunction by stimulating multiple sources of superoxide anion radical production and decreasing nitric oxide bioavailability,” Cellular Physiology and Biochemistry, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 255–268, 2007.

R. Brigelius-Flohé, A. Banning, and K. Schnurr, “Selenium-dependent enzymes in endothelial cell function,” Antioxidants and Redox Signaling, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 205–215, 2003.

H. Esterbauer, G. Wag, and H. Puhl, “Lipid peroxidation and its role in atherosclerosis,” British Medical Bulletin, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 566–576, 1993.

H. Sies, V. S. Sharov, L. O. Klotz, and K. Briviba, “Glutathione peroxidase protects against peroxynitrite-mediated oxidations: a new function for selenoproteins as peroxynitrite reductase,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 272, no. 44, pp. 27812–27817, 1997.

M. A. Forgione, A. Cap, R. Liao et al., “Heterozygous cellular glutathione peroxidase deficiency in the mouse: abnormalities in vascular and cardiac function and structure,” Circulation, vol. 106, no. 9, pp. 1154–1158, 2002.

S. Blankenberg, H. J. Rupprecht, C. Bickel et al., “Glutathione peroxidase 1 activity and cardiovascular events in patients with coronary artery disease,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 349, no. 17, pp. 1605–1613, 2003.

J. B. de Haan, C. Bladier, P. Griffiths et al., “Mice with a homozygous null mutation for the most abundant glutathione peroxidase, Gpx1, show increased susceptibility to the oxidative stress- inducing agents paraquat and hydrogen peroxide,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 273, no. 35, pp. 22528–22536, 1998.

L. A. Esposito, J. E. Kokoszka, K. G. Waymire, B. Cottrell, G. R. MacGregor, and D. C. Wallace, “Mitochondrial oxidative stress in mice lacking the glutathione peroxidase-1 gene,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 754–766, 2000.

T. Yoshida, N. Maulik, R. M. Engelman et al., “Glutathione peroxidase knockout mice are susceptible to myocardial ischemia reperfusion injury,” Circulation, vol. 96, no. 9, supplement, pp. II216–II220, 1997.

P. Lewis, N. Stefanovic, J. Pete et al., “Lack of the antioxidant enzyme glutathione peroxidase-1 accelerates atherosclerosis in diabetic apolipoprotein E-deficient mice,” Circulation, vol. 115, no. 16, pp. 2178–2187, 2007.

M. A. Forgione, N. Weiss, S. Heydrick et al., “Cellular glutathione peroxidase deficiency and endothelial dysfunction,” American Journal of Physiology, vol. 282, no. 4, pp. H1255–H1261, 2002.

F. Fumeron, A. F. Reis, and G. Velho, “Genetics of macrovascular complications in diabetes,” Current Diabetes Reports, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 162–168, 2006.

G. Galasso, S. Schiekofer, K. Sato et al., “Impaired angiogenesis in glutathione peroxidase-1-deficient mice is associated with endothelial progenitor cell dysfunction,” Circulation Research, vol. 98, no. 2, pp. 254–261, 2006.

N. Ardanaz, X. P. Yang, M. E. Cifuentes et al., “Lack of glutathione peroxidase 1 accelerates cardiac-specific hypertrophy and dysfunction in angiotensin II hypertension,” Hypertension, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 116–123, 2010.

S. Chrissobolis, S. P. Didion, D. A. Kinzenbaw et al., “Glutathione peroxidase-1 plays a major role in protecting against angiotensin II-induced vascular dysfunction,” Hypertension, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 872–877, 2008.

P. Chew, D. Y. C. Yuen, N. Stefanovic et al., “Antiatherosclerotic and renoprotective effects of ebselen in the diabetic apolipoprotein E/GPx1-double knockout mouse,” Diabetes, vol. 59, no. 12, pp. 3198–3207, 2010.

P. Chew, D. Y.C. Yuen, P. Koh et al., “Site-specific antiatherogenic effect of the antioxidant ebselen in the diabetic apolipoprotein E-deficient mouse,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 823–830, 2009.

H. Sui, W. Wang, P. H. Wang, and L. S. Liu, “Effect of glutathione peroxidase mimic ebselen (PZ51) on endothelium and vascular structure of stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats,” Blood Pressure, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 366–372, 2005.

S. V. Brodsky, O. Gealekman, J. Chen et al., “Prevention and reversal of premature endothelial cell senescence and vasculopathy in obesity-induced diabetes by ebselen,” Circulation Research, vol. 94, no. 3, pp. 377–384, 2004.

N. Ali, M. Yoshizumi, K. Tsuchiya et al., “Ebselen inhibits p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase-mediated endothelial cell death by hydrogen peroxide,” European Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 485, no. 1–3, pp. 127–135, 2004.

K. P. Bhabak and G. Mugesh, “Amide-based glutathione peroxidase mimics: effect of secondary and amide substituents on antioxidant activity,” Chemistry—An Asian Journal, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 974–983, 2009.

M. A. Hort, M. R. Straliotto, P. M. Netto, J. B. T. Da Rocha, A. F. De Bem, and R. M. Ribeiro-Do-Valle, “Diphenyl diselenide effectively reduces atherosclerotic lesions in LDLr -/- Mice by attenuation of oxidative stress and inflammation,” Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 91–101, 2011.