Semicentralized Power Sharing Scheme for Islanded Parallel-Connected Inverters

-is paper presents a new control scheme that permits flexible power sharing between parallel inverters connected to microgrid operating in an island mode. -e presented scheme processes the information of active and reactive output powers from all inverters in a central controller that calculates the set points for each inverter, based on the desired ratios of their output powers. -ese necessitate adjustment of the inverters’ terminal voltages (phase and magnitude) relative to the voltage at the common AC bus. -e proposed power-sharing scheme uses a robust low bandwidth-based sharing communication to achieve precision and fast dynamic response, minimum circulating current between parallel inverters, and adapting to changes in line impedance, even under information transfer delays. -e presented power-sharing scheme has been validated using MATLAB/Simulink simulation and experimental results obtained from a prototype of three three-phase parallel inverters connected to a number of loads. -e results emphasize the superiority of the proposed topology performance under different loads (25% to 100%), line impedances, grid conditions, and communication delay.


Introduction
Increasing demand for large-scale power delivery with high reliability necessitates the use of multiple distributed energy resources (DERs) to be connected in parallel; for example, parallel inverters in microgrid operation [1]. e proper operation of the parallel inverters requires sophisticated control techniques. Many of these techniques have been proposed in the past decades and continue to evolve [2].
Among several methods for controlling parallel inverters, a frequency-voltage droop method is well established and commonly used, with proven track record [3].
is technique mimics the operation of a large-scale power system that uses predefined droop characteristic that relates generator speed and output active power. is technique is also known as wireless control as no communication required between the inverters, thus making it simple to implement and reliable [4]. However, it has several disadvantages that can degrade its performance. Some of its shortcomings are as follows: its frequency and amplitude deviations are load dependent, hence resulting in poor load voltage regulation performance; inherent tradeoff between the voltage regulation and the power sharing between the inverters; and impedance mismatched among inverters affects the power sharing performance [5].
In [6], power derivative-integral terms are introduced into a conventional droop scheme to improve its transient response. However, it is difficult to select the suitable coefficients for the derivative term that ensures the stable system operation. In [11], the authors proposed a combined static droop characteristics with an adaptive transient droop function to ensure active damping of power oscillations. However, the authors did not present experimental validation for this technique. In [16], the authors proposed an improved droop technique that uses web-based low bandwidth communication to improve the load sharing performance. is technique achieves good active power sharing in a low voltage network, but the authors did not present the results for reactive power sharing. A droop control with an optimization algorithm is introduced in [13]. It uses particle swarm optimization to optimize the droop constant. It shows good active and reactive power sharing in simulation, but there is no hardware verification.
Recently, it has been recognized that excellent current sharing and voltage regulation in a parallel system can be achieved by sharing some information among parallelconnected inverters. Examples of the control techniques that utilize communication among parallel inverters are active load sharing techniques. ey can be classified as circularchain current technique [19], master-slave technique [20], and the average current sharing technique [21,22]. In the circular-chain current technique, successive inverter modules track the current of the previous inverter to achieve an equal current distribution. However, the main weakness of this approach is that it heavily relies on communication bringing robust uncertainty to the system. e master-slave technique utilizes one inverter to regulate the amplitude and frequency, and remaining inverters act as slaves that inject currents. In the average current sharing technique, all the inverters in the microgrid contribute to voltage, frequency, and current regulations. Additionally, the average current information is calculated by averaging the inverter current injection into a common bus and shared as a reference for each module. e previous discussions have shown that both droop and active load sharing techniques have their own advantages and drawbacks. e methods to address the drawback diverse from communication to communicationless methods. In some applications, the inverters have tight loading requirements to prevent overheating and preserve longer lifetime, and accurate sharing of active and reactive power is crucial. Having the flexibility to modify the power references while keeping accurate sharing and damped responses will facilitate those applications. erefore, it is desirable to have a control technique that is flexible and reliable with good voltage regulation and current sharing properties, and reduced circulating current, with minimum low-cost communication and robust for communication delays.
is paper proposes a new power-sharing algorithm that requires low bandwidth communication with a central controller. e central controller receives active and reactive power information from all parallel-connected inverters and calculates active and reactive power references for each inverter.
ese references are calculated based on the specified ratio of output power of each inverter. Based on this information, each inverter adjusts its voltage reference phase and amplitude relative to the common AC bus to achieve the required output power. is technique adjusts the phase (not the frequency); hence, it can achieve good frequency regulation. e proposed controller can be considered as a strong candidate for module inverter design where the capability can be extended per request.
is controller brings scalability and flexibility with accuracy to achieve a wide range of power.
is paper is organized in seven sections. Brief review of power flow theory is presented in Section 2.
e system structure and proposed power sharing technique are discussed in Section 3. Section 4 presents the stability analysis of the proposed technique. Sections 5 and 6 present the MATLAB/Simulink simulation and experimental results, respectively, to confirm the validity and effectiveness of the proposed technique. e major findings and contributions of this paper are highlighted in the conclusions in Section 7.

AC Power Flow Analysis
e equivalent circuit of inverter connected to the common AC bus is shown in Figure 1. e complex power injected by an inverter to the common AC bus is given as follows [23]: where P is the active power and Q is the reactive power. Figure 1 shows the simplest equivalent circuit for an inverter exporting/importing power from the grid where E is the amplitude of inverter output voltage measured at filter bus, V is the common bus voltage amplitude, and α is the power angle. Z and θ are the magnitude and phase of the overall system impedance, which consist of resistance and inductive reactance, R and jωL. e dominant factors to control the active and reactive powers depend on the line impedance being inductive or resistive which were investigated more in [5,24]. It is important to mention here that the low voltage network is dominantly in resistive nature (low L/R ratio). However, it has been realized that the output impedance can be shaped [25] to be dominantly inductive or resistive using the virtual impedance loop within the voltage control loop [26]. Figure 2 shows the active and reactive power plots for different voltage levels and under highly inductive and resistive impedance conditions when the power angle is varied. It is assumed that the voltage amplitude at the inverter filter bus is the same as that at the common AC bus. Active and reactive power plots for different voltage levels and under highly inductive and resistive impedance conditions when the inverter's voltage amplitude is varied are shown in Figure 3. In this case, it is assumed that the power angle α is kept at 0°. For inductive line impedance, X is set to 1.57 Ω, and for resistive line impedance, R is set to 0.3 Ω. Figure 2(a) shows that for inductive line impedance, inverter active power output increases as the power angle increases and vice versa. e rate of active power change increases at a higher voltage level, while there is no 2 International Transactions on Electrical Energy Systems significant change in reactive power as power angle increases or decreases for all voltage levels, as shown in Figure 2(b). For resistive line impedance, change in power angle does not significantly affect inverter active power output; however, it varies the amount of reactive power inverter exchanges with the load. ese observations can be seen in Figures 2(c) and 2(d).
On the one hand, when the power angle α is kept at 0°, changing the amplitude of inverter's voltage does not affect active power in the system with highly inductive line impedance and reactive power in resistive line impedance, as shown in Figures 3(a) and 3(d), respectively. On the other hand, increasing the amplitude of inverter's voltage increases reactive power for inductive line impedance and active power in resistive line impedance system and vice versa. is is applicable for all voltage levels, as shown in Figures 3(b) and 3(c).

Principle of Proposed Semicentralized Power
Sharing Scheme is section discusses the proposed power sharing technique, circuit configuration, synchronization technique, central controller, reference voltage adjustment, and communication structure.

Circuit Configuration.
e parallel-connected inverter configuration used in this paper is shown in Figure 4(a). Each inverter module consists of a three-phase inverter, which is controlled using sinusoidal pulse width modulation (SPWM), output power filter, contactor, two voltage transducers, and interface inductor. e first voltage transducer is placed after the output power filter and  Figure 1: Equivalent circuit of inverter connected to common AC bus [5].

S = P+jQ
International Transactions on Electrical Energy Systems 3 followed by a contactor. is transducer measures the inverter's output voltage when it is connected to the microgrid. ere is another voltage transducer placed after the contactor, which enables the inverter to measure V pcc prior and during the synchronization stage. Each inverter's output voltage is regulated by proportional integral (PI) controller in the DQ synchronous reference frame, as shown in Figure 4(b). e interface inductor is needed to limit inrush current during inverter synchronization to the AC bus.
is inductor dominates the overall line impedance; hence, the system becomes inductive. e central controller receives active and reactive power information from each inverter and calculates the active and reactive power references for each inverter. A low bandwidth communication is used to share the power information between different inverters. e details on communication are covered in Section 3.5.

Synchronization of Parallel Inverter.
Synchronization with minimum errors in the phase and magnitude of the connecting inverter compared to those in operation is important for any proper transition from single inverter operation to parallel operation. Improper synchronization creates large inrush current at the moment of connection to the AC bus. ere are several synchronization techniques discussed in the literature, and the majority use a digital phase locked loop (PLL) [27]. However, the proposed power sharing technique uses a zero-crossing technique presented in [28] for its simplicity and good performance in islanded microgrid.
In this approach, the zero-crossing detection method is used to synchronize connecting inverter's reference voltage frequency and phase to the voltage at the point of common coupling (V pcc ). e first inverter establishes the voltage and frequency using internally generated reference voltage V * defined as follows: where E is the preset amplitude, α(k) is the angle, f is the system fundamental frequency, T(k) is the switching period, and f sw is the switching frequency. During the synchronization of the subsequent inverter, each connecting inverter measures its V pcc and sends this information to its own reference voltage generator (RVG). RVG locates the zero crossing of V pcc and makes the adjustment to the T(k) value through several reset-wait-measure-change procedural loops to adjust its reference voltage frequency to be the same as the frequency of V pcc . When the frequency is synchronized, RVG resets the angle α(k) to 0 after detecting the next zero crossing to synchronize the phase of the connecting inverter to the phase of V pcc .

Central Controller.
e main function of the central controller is to generate the reference active and reactive powers for each inverter, taking the output active and reactive power information from each inverter at the previous sampling period. e central controller has the advantage of sharing the total active and reactive powers needed between the inverters by any arbitrary ratio that can be specified.

Contactor
Inverter N Gate Driver SPWM Controller

International Transactions on Electrical Energy Systems
Assuming N inverters are connected to the microgrid, the ratio for active power and reactive power is defined as follows: where R Pj and R Qj are the active and reactive power ratios set to j th inverter, respectively. e active and reactive power references for j th inverter are shown as where P h and Q h are the output active and reactive power from the h th inverter, respectively.

Reference Voltage Adjustment.
When the RVG of an inverter receives the power references from the central controller, it calculates the active and reactive power differences. e active and reactive power differences of the j th inverter are given by From these power differences, the RVG makes adjustments to the reference voltage in order to force the inverter active and reactive output powers to follow their references. e voltage adjustment can be divided into two stages, which are the phase adjustment and amplitude adjustment. As stated earlier in this section, on the one hand, the system impedance is assumed to be dominated by inductive reactance, so the active power can be adjusted by varying the phase of reference voltage at the filter bus relative to that of the common AC bus. On the other hand, the reactive power can be changed by adjusting the amplitude of the reference voltage. ere is no change in the frequency of the reference voltage. It is worth mentioning here that with the adjustment made by the controller, a consideration should be taken to compensate for the deviation to voltage, in particular, the amplitude. One way to compensate this is using a virtual impedance [29]. However, for the sake of simplification and highlighting the controller responses, the virtual impedance is neglected.

Phase Adjustment.
e RVG monitors the P ∆j and makes adjustment to its power angle α j based on the following conditions: where P aj , P bj , and P cj are the active power sublimits of j th inverter and ∆α xj , ∆α yj , and ∆α zj are the adjustment angles for j th inverter for every sampling time. e active power sublimits are defined as where P 0 j is the rated active power of j th inverter. Figure 5(a) shows the time diagrams that will be used to assist in derivation of the expression for the adjustment angles used in the proposed power sharing. ∆P xj , ∆P yj , and ∆P zj are the changes in j th inverter active power output as a result of different angle adjustments, T d is sampling period, and T r is the maximum time needed to change inverter output power from the initial operating condition to the desired new operating point. T r can be divided into three equally-divided sections with different levels of adjustment to the output power.
Assuming an inverter is just connected to microgrid and required to output its rated active power and the voltage magnitude at the filter bus and the common AC bus remain constant within each sampling period, the following proportional expression can be obtained as follows: 6 International Transactions on Electrical Energy Systems e active power injected by an inverter into the common AC bus is rearranged as follows (with the assumption that E ≈ V) to obtain the expression for the adjustment angle: From this equation, the following expressions for adjustment angles can be obtained by replacing ∆P x , ∆P y , and ∆P z from (8)-(10), respectively, into the P term in (11).
Adding or subtracting an adjustment value ∆α xj to the angle α j produces rapid change in active power coming from the j th inverter, while adjustment values ∆α yj and ∆α zj produce relatively slower changes in active power. When |P ∆j | is between P bj and P cj , even slower adjustment is needed to avoid the fluctuation of active power output around the set point.

Amplitude Adjustment.
e RVG also monitors Q ∆j and makes adjustment to the reference voltage amplitude simultaneously as the load angle adjustment in the previous step.
e adjustments to the amplitude of the reference voltage are based on the following conditions: where Q aj , Q bj , and Q cj are the active power limits of j th inverter and ∆E xj , ∆E yj , and ∆E zj are the amplitude adjustments for j th inverter in every sampling time. e reactive power limits are defined as where Q 0 j is the rated reactive power of j th inverter. Figure 5(b) shows the time diagrams that will be used to assist in derivation of the expression for the amplitude International Transactions on Electrical Energy Systems 7 adjustments used in the proposed power sharing, and ∆Q xj , ∆Q yj , and ∆Q zj are the changes in j th inverter reactive power output as a result of different amplitude adjustments.
Assuming an inverter is just connected to microgrid and required to output its rated reactive power, the following proportional expression can be obtained: e reactive power injected by an inverter into the common AC bus is rearranged as follows (with the assumption that α ≈ 0) to obtain the expression for the amplitude adjustments: From this equation, the following expressions for amplitude adjustments can be obtained by replacing ∆Q x , ∆Q y , and ∆Q z from (17)- (19), respectively, into the Q term in (20).
e summarized reference voltage adjustment steps by the RVG are shown in Figure 6.

Communication Structure.
is control technique required a low-bandwidth communication for the active and reactive power information exchange between each inverter and the central controller. e communication type may vary depending on inverter locations in the system and available communication structure. For example, in rural areas, company intranet and dedicated website can be used for communication, as proposed in [16]. If the inverters are located in the same building but separate far away from each other, the local area network communication can be used [15]. e experimental works presented in this paper use communication based on PWM signals outputted by each DSP and converted back to DC value at the target destination using low pass filters. e PWM frequency used for the communication is 10 kHz, which is higher than switching frequency used for the inverter control (4.2 kHz).
is high frequency is adopted so that a small filter size can be used to filter out the PWM signal.

Stability Analysis of the Proposed Power Sharing Technique
A small signal model has been developed for the proposed power sharing technique to assess its stability against the controller parameters and the chosen power ratio. e small signal model represents multiparallel inverters connected to the PCC with a shared load. As the voltage controller for each inverter has been implemented in the DQ frame, the output impedance ideally equals zero as the internal model principal states [30]. erefore, the grid-side impedance (L int,j ) will represent the final output impedance for each inverter. A thevenin equivalent for each inverter is used [31] for simplicity as the most major dynamics are dominated by the low frequency modes of power sharing loops [32]. Figure 7 shows the small signal model of the microgrid including the proposed controller. e power control loop gathers the power information from all inverters and then produces a set point for each inverter. e equivalent instantaneous power equals the load power which can be calculated in the DQ frame by e average load power is obtained after passing the instantaneous power through a low pass filter as where P T and Q T are the averaged total power from all inverters and ω c is the cutoff frequency of the low pass filter. Each inverter receives its power set point, and then the required phase angle is calculated as in (12)- (14). erefore, the phase of each inverter can be obtained as where m j is the active power-phase gain for the j th inverter.
In the same way, the amplitude is obtained by where n j is the reactive power-amplitude gain for the j th inverter. By linearizing equations (23)   International Transactions on Electrical Energy Systems where the capital letter notations (I L D , I LQ , V L D , V LQ ) denote the steady state values which can be obtained by MATLAB/Simulink simulation of the model. e state of the output current for each inverter can be modeled as Because the load states are in the common DQ frame which are obtained by the common bus frequency and phase, each inverter state has to be transformed to the common DQ frame instead of its local DQ frame.
us, inverter 1 frame can be chosen as the common, and all states should be represented by the same transformation to the common frame. e mapping matrices for the states i o dq ,j to i o DQ ,j are calculated as e common phase angle Δα com equals Δα 1 for our assumption.
In the same manner, the state of the load voltage can be transformed to the local frame which is used in (28) by Each inverter, j, now can be modeled as a subsystem of the entire model as For the sake of the entire microgrid model development, the states of the inverter's output currents in (30) can be all combined together as Δi o dq , 2 .
Finally, the state of the load connected to the PCC represented by the load current state is derived as It is clear that the load voltage is treated as input to some subsystems. To close the loop, the load voltage Δv L DQ has to be defined in terms of the available states. e virtual resistor method is used to ease the derivation. A virtual resistor R v with a high value (1000 Ω) is assumed to be connected to the PCC. is resistor has a negligible impact on the system dynamics [33]. Consequently, the Δv L DQ is calculated as By rearranging (33), e entire microgrid model including the proposed control scheme is obtained as where Equations (24) and (25) include the parameters of the proposed controller which are T d , T a , R Pj , R PT , R Qj , and R QT , while X j and V j are assumed to be fixed variable. For a distribution ratio of 1 : 1 : 1, Figure 8 shows the root locus of the system when (T a /100) < T d < (T a /2) and T a � 100 ms. It is obvious that variations of T d have no significant effect on the system dynamics. e dominant poles (on the right) are controlled by the output impedance values and the low pass filter cutoff frequency. Figure 9 shows the low frequency pole evolution when the low pass filter cutoff frequency varies as the output inductance of the first inverter changes as 0.5 mH < L o,1 < 30 mH, while the others are the same as in Table 1. As the output impedance and the cut off frequency are fixed in the design phase, the dynamics of the system, regardless of the ratio among inverters and the controller response time, and assure the stability.

Results and Discussion: Simulation Analysis
is section presents MATLAB/Simulink simulations that aim to validate the performance of the proposed power sharing scheme. e proposed scheme is validated on a microgrid, as shown in Figure 4(a) that comprises of three parallel inverters and loads, with parameters listed in Table 1.
e simulation results are divided into two parts. Part I compares the dynamic performance of the proposed power sharing scheme to that of the conventional droop control under similar operating conditions. Additionally, the robustness of the proposed controller to the impedance mismatch is investigated by using unequal interfacing inductors for all inverters. A delay of 5 ms is added to the information exchange between inverters and the central controller to consider the effect of communication delay in real world application. Part II presents the performance of the proposed power sharing scheme with different power ratios assigned to each inverter.
In both parts, initially, inverter 1 output voltage is ramped up to its rated voltage and connected to load 1 (all the power is provided by inverter 1). At time t � 100 ms, a second inverter is connected to the microgrid followed by the third inverter at t � 400 ms. e load 1 is disconnected at t � 1.0 s and reconnected at t � 1.2 s. At t � 1.6 s, the additional load (load 2) is added to load 1.

Simulation Part I.
In this part, all the three inverters share the total load power by the ratio of 1 : 1 : 1. Figure 11 presents simulation results that compare the proposed power sharing scheme to that of the conventional droop technique. It is important to mention that a discrete loading is applied at the beginning of simulation to expose the proposed controller action and performance and then followed by a significant load step. e initial load was 420 W and after reaching the steady state, the load was disconnected, and the second step was to 1350 W. Figure 11(a) presents current contributions of the three inverters and total load current waveform using the proposed power sharing scheme, while the current waveforms obtained using conventional droop are presented in Figure 11(b). ese results have shown that both control schemes are able to share the total load between the three inverters but with different dynamic responses. Figures 11(c) and 11(d) show the active and reactive power output of three inverters and the total load active and reactive powers using the proposed power sharing technique and the droop control, respectively. It can be observed that the proposed power sharing scheme has faster dynamic response compared to that of the conventional droop control as it takes less than 100 ms to equally share the active and reactive powers between the three inverters. Also, the proposed power scheme exhibits lower circulating currents between the inverters than the conventional droop control. When the second load is connected at t � 1.6 s, good transient and steady state performances are observed. Figure 11(d) has shown that the droop control has slower dynamic response and takes longer period for the inverters to achieve equal active power sharing, while it is unable to achieve equal reactive power sharing. is is because the conventional droop control is sensitive to impedance mismatch.  Figure 9: Root locus of the system when the low pass filter cutoff frequency varies as 1 < ω c < 300 rad/s.

Simulation Part II.
is part presents simulation results when the three inverters share active and reactive powers by ratios of 1 : 2 : 4 and 1 : 1 : 1, respectively, to emphasize its accuracy against different distribution of output powers. Figure 12(a) shows the output current of the three inverters and total load current waveforms. Figure 12(b) displays active and reactive power output of the three inverters and load active and reactive power. It can be seen that the proposed power sharing is able to force the inverters active and reactive output powers to follow the ratios set by the central controller, within less than 5 cycles (100 ms). When an additional load is introduced at t � 1.6 s, all inverters are still able to satisfy the required power ratios set by the central controller.

Results and Discussion: Experimental Analysis
A scaled down prototype of microgrid consists of three inverters and a number of local loads are constructed to validate the practicality of the proposed power sharing scheme. Figure 13 shows hardware arrangement and picture of the experimental test rig. Each inverter is controlled by an Infineon TriCore ™ TC1796B. e same DSP is used for the central controller. e communication is implemented using PWM channels at the source and low pass filters at the destination targets as previously explained. is approach is chosen for its simplicity and considering close proximity of the inverters.
e test rig parameters are the same as in the simulation section. Experiential results are organized in the same order as in simulation. An additional case that demonstrates the performance of the proposed power sharing scheme under nonlinear load is presented. Figure 14 shows the experimental results under different operating conditions when the three parallel inverters equally shared the active power and reactive power needed by the load (by ratio of 1 : 1 : 1). Figure 14(a) shows system transient response when inverter 2 is introduced to the load bus in the microgrid, while Figure 14(b) presents experimental waveforms that illustrate system steady state and transient response when inverter 3 is introduced. It can be observed that the power sharing between the inverters is achieved without any inrush current or significant transients, and thanks to synchronization method adopted in this paper and proposed power sharing scheme. Figure 14(c) depicts the system response during sudden disconnection of the main load. Circulating currents are observed to flow between the inverters after the load is disconnected.

Experiment Part I.
at is because the line impedance mismatches which is explained in [34]. Obviously, the proposed controller is able to damp these currents. Figure 14(d) shows that the circulating currents between inverters when the main load is disconnected are small (around 300 mA peak to peak). Waveforms that illustrate the system response during transition from light load to full load are presented in Figure 14(e). Results that illustrate the applicability of the  proposed power sharing scheme to nonlinear load are displayed in Figure 14(f ) when a rectifier feeds a passive load is introduced at the main AC bus. It is observed that the proposed power sharing is able to cope with nonlinear load that injects significant current harmonics. e output voltage of all the three inverters and load voltage when all the inverters are connected to microgrid are shown in Figure 15.

Experiment Part II.
In this part, the active power ratio and reactive power ratio are set to 1 : 2 : 4 and 1 : 1 : 1, respectively.
is means P 1 � (1/7)P L , P 2 � (2/7)P L , and P 3 � (4/7)P L ;  Figure 16(a), the transient performance when inverter 2 is connected to microgrid is shown. is result shows smooth transient performance, and after 350 ms, both inverters are able to achieve the specified power ratio. e same good transient performances are observed when inverter 3 is connected to the microgrid, and this is shown in Figure 16(b). e steady state performance of the three inverters supplying load 1 and transient performance when the load is disconnected are shown in Figure 16(c). In Figure 16(d), the circulating currents among the parallel inverters are shown, and they are small in magnitude. e transient performance from partial loading to full loading is shown in Figure 16(e),   and it can be seen that the specified ratio is achieved. Finally, Figure 16(f ) depicts that this controller is able to achieve the same good performance under nonlinear type load. e simulation and experimental results clearly indicate the superiority of this technique in term of power sharing compared to the conventional droop technique. Additionally, the ability to set the required ratio gives extraflexibility on power management. Table 2 compares the proposed power sharing technique to some of the existing techniques, including droop.

Conclusion
is paper proposed a new power sharing scheme for parallel-connected inverters in islanded microgrid. is technique requires a low-bandwidth communication between inverters and central controller to exchange inverter active and reactive power output information. It has been shown that the proposed power sharing outperforms the conventional droop control as it has faster dynamic response and better sharing of reactive power between the inverters that use different line impedances and able to damp the circulating currents. Simulation and hardware implementation results have demonstrated that the proposed power sharing technique is robust under impedance mismatches, load steps, nonlinear load conditions, and demonstrated its hot swap capability. e ability to set the specific active and reactive power ratios gives flexibility to the utility owner to manage the available power in an efficient manner, which enables power demand management and reforming including peak shifting, capping, and bidirectional power flow.

Data Availability
e data used to support the findings of the study are available from the first author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest
e authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.