Optimizing PV Power Output with Higher-Voltage Modules: A Comparative Analysis with Traditional MPPT Methods

,


Introduction
Due to the rising energy needs and the need to make power in a way that is good for the environment, the PV generator is the one that is used the most. Maximum power point tracking (MPPT) techniques are used in [1] to get the maximum power possible from the PV panel while accounting for variations in actual voltage and current. Current, voltage, curve-ftting, gradient descent, slide mode, incremental resistance MPPT, and AI-based methods such as fuzzy logic, neural networks, ANFIS, and hybrid methods were discussed, and the benefts and drawbacks of each were tallied based on diferent criteria [2].
Te performance of PV panels is primarily infuenced by irradiance, ambient PV cell temperature, and load impedance. In the study of [3], MPPTcharacteristics are compared. For a ramp change in radiance (600-1000-700 W/m 2 ) and a step change in irradiance (300-600-300 W/m 2 ), (400-1000-400 W/m 2 ), and (500−1000 W/m 2 ) [4,5] and for fxed and variable increment techniques, the responses of several MPPT techniques are compared. For a small-scale PV power system, the efect of temperature is taken into account and an MPPT is constructed [6].
Most commonly, standalone mode operation of a single PV source is used to develop several MPPT approaches. To achieve the MPP with the reference of the output values of the systems, the method was implemented in the incremental conductance (INC), perturb and observe (P&O), and constant voltage controller (CVC) methods [7]. Te modifed IC method based on the new average global peak value was implemented in the existing INC method, and improved efciencies are tabulated [8]. A direct control structure and buck-boost converter were implemented in both the P&O and INC methods. Te results yield 98.3% efciency in the P&O method and 98.5% in the INC method [9]. In these same methods, the feld-programmable gate array (FPGA) was used in the high-speed test algorithm in the loop feature [10]. Te soft MPPT technique is proposed in both P&O and INC methods to solve the issue of continuous steady state oscillations [11]. Problems with gridintegrated PV systems such as low active power, poor MPPT performance, and power loss [12]. Intelligent controllers with convertors are used with fundamental MPPT techniques like IC, P&O, and CVC to address this complexity [13]. Te PV terminal voltage is periodically perturbed and compared to the prior value using the perturb and observe (P&O) approach. Te P&O output is fuctuating slowly as the air conditions approach the maximum power operating point (MPOP). Te MPOP deviated when the meteorological conditions changed quickly [14]. In the constant voltage (CV) approach, the PV voltage is matched to the reference voltage closer to the maximum power point. In contrast to other approaches in [15], the incremental conductance (IC) method draws maximum power at lower and rapidly varying irradiance conditions.
Power converters serve as MPP trackers by changing the power switches' duty cycle [16]. Tree dynamic test operation procedures, such as day-by-day operation, stepped operation, and EN50530 operation procedures, were introduced in P&O, VSSIC, and the hybrid step-size beta method [17]. Soft computing methods such as Kalman flter, fuzzy logic control (FLC), neural network, partial swarm optimisation (PSO), ant colony optimisation (ACO), artifcial bee colony (ABC), bat algorithm, and hybrid PSO-FLC are introduced, and the results are computed [18]. In standalone or grid-connected PV systems, single or double power converters are used depending on the load requirements [19,20]. Te single stage inverter (SSI) is used in place of the double stage converter to reduce costs and the number of components [21]. Te PV parameters are adjusted to keep the DC motor parameter constant at various levels of irradiation [22]. Using PWM pulses from MPPT, the conductance value of the power converter can be changed [23]. A solo PV system with a basic resistive load was simulated under varying weather conditions (−25 C to −50 C) [24,25]. A variable step size incremental conductance is created to enhance the dynamic and steady state performance of the incremental conductance approach in load impedance change [26].
A battery energy storage system (BESS) is added to the PV system for residential applications in order to maintain the voltage level and prevent power supply interruptions [27]. To extract the most power possible, the PV is matched with the residential load line. For a single stage inverter PV system, constant and changing insolation (300 W/m 2 to 700 W/m 2 ) is taken into account, and the MPPT controller is built to run in standalone or grid linked mode depending on the PV output availability. By integrating one cycle control with MPPT, a single stage inverter with MPPT that increases power output by 3% and has an efciency of more than 90% is increased to 95.67% [28].
Te computational complexity of fuzzy logic controllers is lower than that of traditional controllers. Performance of a fxed step size (1000 W/m 2 to 500 W/m) controller is evaluated with fuzzy logic with particle-swarm-optimization-based MPPT. Cell temperature will not have an impact on the power factor and the dc link voltage as they are independently managed [29] for the grid connected single stage inverter for step change in solar irradiation. Te fuzzy controller's membership function shape is changed to regulate the distance between its operational and maximum power points, and the increment in conductance is changed to be proportional to solar irradiation [30]. An adaptive fuzzy logic MPPT controller is proposed and tested for gridconnected PV systems [31] in order to enhance simplefuzzy-logic-based MPPT. Tere is discussion of several single stage and multistage inverters. Grid-connected PV generators use unidirectional inverters to allow power to fow from the source to the grid. When using grid-connected PV with local loads or stand-alone PV with reactive loads, a bidirectional converter is used. Te development of an adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) PSO-based MPPT approach took into account ten diferent patterns of temperature and solar insolation [32]. To improve the shortterm PV power forecasting, an ANFIS-based MPPT controller with a combination of GA-PSO is implemented.
Te use of voltage/current-based ANN MPPTalgorithms is encouraged because the difculty of hardware implementation and the cost of sensors prevented consideration of irradiance and temperature fuctuation [33]. A long-term study is conducted to determine the accuracy. Te ANNbased MPPT is constructed, and the efectiveness in locating the ideal operating point for stationary modules with a slope of 30 degrees is shown for various seasonal variations [34].
To address power quality improvement and safety concerns, various isolated microinverter topologies were considered for grid-connected systems [35]. Te incremental conductance method is chosen from the literature review because it performs better than other MPPT techniques, particularly for changeable irradiance in grid-connected PV systems. Te majority of studies used constant irradiance, while some of them also used irradiance changes of more than 400 W/m 2 . In order to obtain the greatest power for a sudden change in irradiance, a grid-connected PV system with a new MPPT technique is suggested in this research. Te servo mechanism and new MPPT approach are proposed at lower irradiances (250 W/m 2 ) to obtain the maximum power, and the uplift of power from source to grid is thoroughly studied [36]. Te biased three-winding transformer performance was analyzed, and the result obtained through the biased MPPT technique in INC MPPT methods is taken into reference [37].
According to a literature review, no additional equipment has been employed to get the most power possible from the panel thus far. In this study, a novel method for obtaining MPPT is presented employing extra devices.
Tis section gives a quick overview of various PV systems and their MPPT methods that are described in the literature. Problems encountered when connecting the PV system to the grid and various approaches taken to achieve optimal efciency are highlighted. Te reference papers provide a brief description of the benefts and drawbacks. It International Transactions on Electrical Energy Systems introduces the idea of extract maximum power using additional devices.

Functional Block Diagram of the Proposed System.
In the proposed method, the PV generator is connected to the microgrid through a couple of inverter and transformer. During low irradiance, the auxiliary transformer output voltage is added to boost the PV voltage and produce the power with the help of feedback power from the grid through the impulse integrated inverter MPPT method. Te proposed impulse integrated inverter MPPT approach for grid-tied PV generators is shown functionally in Figure 1. Trough a couple of inverters, flter circuits, and transformers, the PV module is connected to the single phase grid. An inverter and a flter circuit are used at the front stage of both the transformer to convert the DC voltage of PV to AC voltage. Te main inverter is rated highly, while the auxiliary inverter is rated lower. Both main transformer and auxiliary transformer secondary windings are linked together in series. Te secondary windings of both transformers are connected to the grid. Te secondary voltage of the auxiliary transformer is added to increase the PV voltage to match the grid voltage level. Te MPPT controller receives I pv and V pv from the PV array output terminals along with the I rr reference. Te MPPT controller's pulses cause the inverter circuit's input conductance to change accordingly. Inverter switches enable the PV to produce the most power possible. Te correct sensors are positioned in the correct locations in order to obtain the reference values of voltage and current.
In this proposed model, the PV panel is divided in to two parts. Tey are as follows: (1) Main panel (2) Auxiliary panel During normal irradiation, switches S 1 and S 2 are in the closed state, and both panels are connected to primary winding 1.
When there is not enough sunlight, the voltage that is present across the primary winding of the transformer is not high enough to allow the power that is available from the photovoltaic panel to be transferred to the secondary side of the transformer, which is connected with the load. After this point, the switch S 1 and the switch S 2 will be turned to the OFF position. Because of this switching operation, the auxiliary photovoltaic panel is now connected to the second primary winding of the transformer, and there is now an adequate voltage produced across the primary side of the transformer.

Proposed System
Modeling. Te equivalent circuit for solar cell shown in Figure 2 is represented as a current source infuenced by the photons is connected in parallel with diode which represents barrier in the PV cell and with the series connected resistor RS and the parallel connected resistor RP. Kirchhof's law is applied in equation (1) to get the current obtained from the PV. PV current variation is proportional to the change in the environmental changes like irradiance and temperature changes which leads to the nonlinearity behavior. Hence, the maximum power from the PV is not easily taken and the curve changes with respect to the atmospheric conditions. To overcome this struggle, some (maximum power point tracking) MPPT algorithms are developed to track the curve and extract the available maximum power from the PV. Conductance of the PV is matched with that of the load. Relationship between the impedance values is given in equation (2). Along with the conventional power equation, the conditions for power transfer from source to grid are depicted in equations (3) and (4).
where I PV is output current in the PV panel, I PH is current in the PV panel, I D is current through the parallel resistor, and I R is current through the parallel resistance.
where Z TOTAL is total impedance, Z MAININV is impedance in the main inverter circuit, Z AUXINV is impedance in the auxiliary inverter circuit, Z LCMain is impedance in the main flter circuit, Z LCAux is impedance in the auxiliary flter circuit, Z PyMain is impedance in the main primary side of the transformer, and Z PyAux is impedance in the auxiliary primary side of the transformer. To transmit power from source to grid, and Here, V PV is output voltage of the PV, V G is grid voltage, and I G is grid current.
Te PV system properly works at higher irradiance value is shown in Figure 3. But for lower irradiance value, it afects the power transfer from source to grid, as it cannot satisfy the condition. Te obtained value of PV voltage and grid voltage relation is given in (5) which is not as in (3) and (4). Te voltage and current equations for the PV system during lower irradiance are given in equations (6) to (11).
At lower irradiance, where, V OMain is output voltage of the main PV and V OAux is output voltage of the auxiliary PV.

International Transactions on Electrical Energy Systems
where V LMain is voltage across inductor in the main circuit, V CMain is voltage across capacitor in main circuit, V PYMain is main circuit primary voltage, V LAux is voltage across inductor in auxiliary circuit, V CAux is voltage across capacitor in auxiliary circuit, and V PyAux is auxiliary circuit primary voltage.
At higher irradiance, To satisfy the condition for power transfer from source to grid, an auxiliary transformer is brought into the system. Te required modifcation needed is obtained in equations (13) and (14).
At lower irradiance, New conditions for power transfer from source to grid are obtained from (15) and (16). Te turns ratio of the auxiliary transformer is given in equations (17) and (18).
Condition for power transfer from PV source to grid, Te overall simplifed diagram is given in fgure 3 Equation (19) shows the computation of load angle δ from the q component of the auxiliary capacitor voltage V CAuxq and the auxiliary capacitor voltage V CAux .   International Transactions on Electrical Energy Systems Equation (20) gives the relationship between the voltage components V CMainαβ and V CMaindq .
Te diference between the actual value P a PV and measured value P M PV gives the ∆P PV . Equations (21) and (22) give the value of P a PV and ∆P PV .
Let us consider I PV � Constant, the required modifcation in the impedance of the PV's output side is getting as follows: Te load angle δ 1 is obtained from the output power of the main inverter and the maximum PV power.
Current mode of a grid connected PV converter is considered in Figure 4 Te relationship between the input vector U in U out U C T and output vector Y in Y out T of the PV inverter can be represented as follows: Te converter output impedance matrix is constructed as follows: To analyze the converter system, the following model is constructed: Input admittance of the converter derived from the PV impedance is as follows: Te cross coupling coefcients are constructed as follows:   International Transactions on Electrical Energy Systems From the analysis of equation (29), the required values of G 22 and i pv a are calculated with the help of δ 1 and δ 2 which values are generated with the help of phase locked loop.
An MPPT controller shown in Figure 5, controls the voltages that come out of the main PV panel and the other auxiliary panel. In this controller, the tabulated available input voltage is taken as a reference and compared with the output voltage; from this diference, the MPPT controller computes the value of the power angle for inverter 2, which is connected between the auxiliary PV panel and primary winding 2. Also, the V pv and I pv values are calculated through the suitable sensors, and the current I RR value is taken as a reference value, then the MPP value is computed. Te driver circuit sends the PWM signal to both inverters and obtains the maximum power from the PV panel.
In Figure 6, the computed PLL value of the main PV panel inverter δ 1 and auxiliary panel inverter δ 2 is generated through the PLL circuit.  If that ratios will not equal then, compare the ∆ ratio with actual parameter ratio (8) If ∆ ratio is greater than the negative value of actual parameters ratios or the ∆ value of current is greater than zero, then increase the voltage value of PV (9) If ∆ ratio is lesser than the negative value of actual parameters ratios or the ∆ value of current is lesser than zero, then decrease the voltage value of PV (10) If the ∆ value of V Sy is not equal to zero, then add the ∆V Sy to the secondary voltage value of transformer by adding the auxiliary circuit to get the new value

Working
Te amount of additional PV panel current (v pv a ) is injected from the additional PV panel with the help of the controllers. Due to I pv a , the required voltage across the primary winding is successfully created and it will drive the available power from the main PV panel to grid. Te proposed simulation setup includes 20 kW panel. Table 1 provides a list of the simulated system parameters for the proposed technique.

Simulink Block Diagram and Resultant Waveforms.
Tree elements make up the suggested system simulation base model for proposed MPPT. As shown in Figure 8, they are the PV array block, control circuit, and power circuit. Figure 9 depicts the simulation of the suggested system. It is split up into three main sections. Te frst installation has two 20 kW PV arrays. Grid-integrated circuits and a transformer with two primary and one secondary winding make up the power circuit. All control components and units are present in the control circuit. Table (2) describes the varying radiation from the sun between 7.00 am and 5.30 pm.

Power Circuit.
On the PI INC transformer, the power circuit is made up of two primary windings and one output winding. One input winding is linked to the inverter from the PV panel 1, and another input winding is connected to the inverter from the PV panel 2 and is controlled by the appropriate controller. Te setup is called as PI INC block. Te current generated by the second winding is used to raise the transformer's output voltage. Te voltage is smoothed using an LC flter. Figure 10 depicts the previously mentioned confguration.

Control Circuit.
Te flter circuit is employed in the simulated power circuit depicted in Figure 11 to cancel out the undesirable signal. For MPPT, a mathematical algorithm is created to determine the value of the needed second PV panel voltage with the help of the computation block. Te 6 International Transactions on Electrical Energy Systems error values are calculated and provided to the PID controller in this stage. Te PWM generator sends output from the PID controller to the VSI. Finally, the secondary winding from the second PV panel receives the computed voltage. Te PV panel's terminal voltage and current are measured, and ripples are eliminated using an appropriate flter. Te PV terminal voltage and current are used to instantly calculate the change in conductance values. Figure 11 illustrates the diference between the actual and reference voltages, which is used to compute the required second PV panel voltage. Due of the proposed system's grid connectivity, synchronization is crucial to grid integration. To track the values of δ1 and δ2 in this method, a single-phase PLL is employed. In the suggested inverter system, this value is used as a reference to generate the modulating signal.
Te simulation control circuit depicted in Figure 11 is essential to the system methodology that is suggested. Trough the specifc computational block, it regulates the system's output.      Figure 13. Initially during the low irradiation 7.00 am to 9.00 am (0 sec to 1 sec) and 4.00 pm to 5.30 pm (2 sec to 3 sec) with no load condition, the current and voltage values of the PV panel   International Transactions on Electrical Energy Systems is very low. But in the normal irradiation, both values got improved. Te electricity drawn from PV is depicted in Figure 14. Te proposed method extracts more power than the traditional method when the irradiance is low.
Te load power that is maintained at both low and high levels of irradiation is shown in Figure 15. Figure 16 shows the grid power for irradiance level. Te grid provides the necessary extra power to the load when the PV power is insufcient to meet the load's needs. If there is more PV power available than what is needed to meet the load, the extra PV electricity is injected into the grid. Te grid power is positive and lower than the traditional incremental MPPT during the 0 sec to 1 sec when power fows from the grid to the load. Te extra PV power is delivered into the grid between 1 and 2 seconds, making the grid power negative. Te grid power is negative in the proposed method whereas it is positive in the conventional way during the time interval of 2 to 3.5 s when the available PV power is marginally larger than the load requirement.
Te auxiliary inverter's power angle variation is seen in Figure 17. During the low irradiation period, the auxiliary unit is connected with the auxiliary inverter. Te auxiliary inverter power angle is generated through the PI INC MPPT controller and this power angle δ is used to improve the transformer primary side voltage.
Te main and auxiliary inverters' peak to peak and rms voltages are displayed in Figure 18 correspondingly. While the auxiliary inverter voltage level is dependent on the PV voltage, the main inverter maintains its voltage level. Te auxiliary inverter output voltage is 0 since it is not necessary when the PV voltage is adequate to power both the load and the grid.
Te auxiliary inverter current is shown in Figure 19. No current is drawn from the inverter when the radiation level is high. Te inverter current is almost 1 A between 0 and 1. Due to biasing, the inverter current is high between 2 second and 3.5 second.

Power and Cost Analysis for the Proposed System
Te power extracted from the 20 kW PV panel is examined and contrasted with the existing incremental conductance MPPT method. Te following two categories are used to underpin investigations: (1) Low irradiation. Table 3 compares the cost of the proposed system to the present system during the low-irradiation period as well as power extraction per hour (2) Irradiation due to cloudy and misty condition. Table 4 compares the existing system's cost analysis and electricity extraction per hour during the overcast and misty period with the proposed system

Low Irradiation.
Comparison of the cost of the proposed system to the present system during the low-irradiation period as well as power extraction per hour is given in Table 3.

Cloudy and Misty Conditions.
Comparison of the existing system's cost analysis and electricity extraction per hour during the overcast and misty period with the proposed system is given in Table 4.

Extracted Power Analysis.
Annual power extraction analysis of proposed and existing MPPT methods energy value are given in (Table 5).

Cost Analysis.
Annual cost analysis of proposed and existing MPPT methods energy value is given in Table 6. Figures 20 and 21 contrast the proposed PI INC approach with the current INC method by providing a visual depiction of energy extraction and cost analysis.
Te suggested methodology is explained in this section. Te choice is made between the transformer and the additional panel. Te transformer was chosen to preserve the voltage profle by adding the necessary voltage. Present is the implementation plan for the increased voltage approach. Tere is provided a functional block diagram of the suggested system. Te PI INC MPPT method's dynamic equation is derived. In addition, provided are the model's   International Transactions on Electrical Energy Systems algorithm and fowchart. In terms of power and cost analysis, a comparison is made between the present and proposed approaches.

Comparative Analysis of Power Extraction during Varied
Irradiation. Table 7 describes the improvement of power developed using the proposed methodology (20 kW Panel).    In Section 3, where simulation parameters and their corresponding values are presented, the suggested method is simulated in full. Te method's simulation block module, control scheme, and power circuit are described. Te PV array's V-I and P-V characteristics are displayed. It is possible to obtain simulation results for the PI INC MPPT method and compare them to INC MPPT. Te outcomes demonstrated the advantages of the PIO INC MPPT. Te proposed system's daily extracted power from the PV was substantially improved according to the simulated output waveforms and data values.   International Transactions on Electrical Energy Systems 13

System Setup.
A simplifed simulation model was used to create the tangible prototype for the Focused Method. Table 8 gives the component ratings for the trial system. Two single-phase inverters constructed using an IGBT power module from SEMIKRON and one auxiliary unit make up this circuit. A secondary winding and a primary winding with two inputs each make up the proposed three-winding transformer. One voltage smoothing capacitor and the secondary winding are linked in parallel to the grid. Trough the inverter circuit, one primary winding is linked to the PV source, while a second winding is linked to the auxiliary PV source. Te required supply is acquired from the auxiliary PV source through the Inverter and it derived with SEMIKRON's-based voltage control circuit. PV source 1 and the auxiliary the corresponding sensor ratings listed in Table 8. Auxiliary PV source's (PV source 2) voltage and current values are measured by suitable sensors and the corresponding sensor ratings listed in Table 8. Te suggested control strategy was created in MATLAB/Simulink using the Simulink coder shown in fgure 22, and it was then implemented in the TI Launchpad f28379 d. Te power control circuit in Figure 23 was isolated using the TLP250, which also served as the power module's driver. Figure 24 depicts the deployment of the whole experimental evaluation system.

Experimental Evaluation Setup of Hardware Photo.
Te hardware input supply for the proposed system comes from a 1 kW PV panel is shown in Figure 24. While drawing power from the PV, three-winding transformers are needed (two primary windings and one secondary winding). Between the primary winding of the transformer (0-15) V and (0-15) V/230V and the PV panel, there are two inverters connected. Te following components: a rectifer, voltage controller, and a TI launch pad f28379 d Texas board controller are used for the control unit, as illustrated in Figure 22.

Control Circuit Implementation Using SIM Coder.
Te terminal voltage and current of the PV panel are measured, and then any ripples in the signal are removed by a flter that is appropriate for the situation. Te voltage and current readings at the PV terminals are immediately put to use in order to calculate the values for the change in conductance. Te auxiliary voltage provided by the PV system is determined by the immediate power availability. Te control circuit is responsible for determining the required auxiliary voltage, with the diference between the actual voltage and the reference voltage being depicted in Figure 22. Since the proposed system will be connected to the grid, synchronization will play an important part in the process of grid integration. For the purpose of achieving frequency tracking of the value of, this method makes use of a single-phase phase-locked loop (PLL). Within the framework of the proposed inverter system, this value of will serve as a reference for the generation of the modulating signal.
An optocoupler TLP250 and a bridge rectifer are used in the driver circuit depicted in Figure 25 to primarily control the voltage. Figure 25. During normal irradiation the auxiliary voltage is connected to the main panel. During low irradiation, the voltage value is reduced in 1 to 2 seconds, and then the auxiliary PV panel is connected to the second winding of the primary winding in 2 to 3 seconds.  In Figure 26, the voltage peaks during the initial period. When the auxiliary unit is connected to the main panel, there is no voltage to fow to the second winding through the auxiliary inverter on the primary side of the transformer. When the switches S 1 and S 2 open, the auxiliary unit is connected to the transformer primary winding 2.      Te RMS value PV panel 2 is shown in Figure 27. When PV panels 1 and 2 are connected to the primary winding, during this period, the RMS value of the auxiliary unit is near zero. Te RMS value is increased after PV panel 2 is connected to the auxiliary unit.

Hardware Result. Te auxiliary PV panel voltage is shown in
Initially, PV panel 1 and PV panel 2 are connected together, and the combined PV output is connected to the load through the transformer. At no load, the combined PV output is high. During low irradiation with load, the output value of PV 1 is reduced, as shown in Figure 28. Figure 29 shows how the power is boosted due to the improved voltage from the auxiliary unit. After the switches are opened, the auxiliary panel is connected to the auxiliary unit. Figures 30(a) and 30(b) depict the proposed PV system's entire impact. Te integrated PV system produces its most electricity under typical irradiation. In 0-1 seconds, it is explicitly mentioned. If there is no power transmission from the period of 1 sec to the period of 2 sec, the radiation period is low. Te PV panel then supplies the load with the available power following the separation of the auxiliary panel, which takes place in 2 to 3 seconds.
Te PLL value of power and its angle are shown in Figures 31(a) and 31(b). When compared to the loading condition, the power angle is superior when it is obtained at low irradiation after one second.
Hardware of the proposed system is developed. Voltage and current of the proposed PI INC MPPT technique were obtained. Extraction of continuous power irrespective of the change in irradiation was presented. Hardware results justify the implementation of proposed MPPT technique as it ensures maximum power extraction under varied environmental conditions.

Conclusion
Te proposed system, PI INC MPPT, was successful in drawing energy from the solar PV panel during periods of low irradiance. Trough research, simulation modelling and efective hardware outcomes, this technique was verifed. Tis unique proposed MPPT approach using an auxiliary unit extracts an additional 3 MW of electricity per year when compared to the current method. Te planned threewinding transformer was built with an auxiliary unit that produces the right output, achieving the ultimate objective. Te Texas board controller proved successful in controlling the voltage needed for the primary winding. Further research is possible using the proposed MPPT with auxiliary unit model because there is a lot of room for interpretation in terms of the feld's potential. Te current economy and the electricity demand are thought to be better suited for this methodology.

Data Availability
Te author gathered the information for their manuscript from the following text books. Data on the world's use of