Journal of Analytical Methods in Chemistry
Volume 2017 (2017), Article ID 9528472, 9 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/9528472

Research Article

SPE/TLC/Densitometric Quantification of Selected Synthetic Food Dyes in Liquid Foodstuffs and Pharmaceutical Preparations

Anna W. Sobańska, Jarosław Pyzowski, and Elżbieta Brzezińska

Department of Analytical Chemistry, Medical University of Lodz, Ul. Muszynskiego 1, 90-151 Lodz, Poland

Correspondence should be addressed to Anna W. Sobańska; anna.sobanska@umed.lodz.pl

Received 28 April 2017; Accepted 18 June 2017; Published 17 July 2017

Academic Editor: Ricardo Jorgensen Cassella

Copyright © 2017 Anna W. Sobańska et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

Selected synthetic food dyes (tartrazine, Ponceau 4R, Brilliant Blue, orange yellow, and azorubine) were isolated from liquid preparations (mouthwashes and beverages) by Solid Phase Extraction on aminopropyl-bonded silica with diluted aqueous sodium hydroxide as an eluent. The extraction step was followed by thin layer chromatography on silica gel 60 with chloroform-isopropanol-25% aq. ammonia 1 : 3 : 1 (v/v/v) as mobile phase and the densitometric quantification of dyes was achieved using quadratic calibration plots (; = 0.04–0.09 μgspot⁻¹). The overall recoveries for all studied dyes were at the average level of over 90% and the repeatability of the proposed procedure (CV ≤ 4.1%) was sufficient to recommend it for the routine quantification of the aforementioned dyes in liquid matrices.

1. Introduction

Synthetic food dyes are still common food additives despite the growing awareness of their negative influence on the human organism. The particularly harmful food colorants are azo dyes that exhibit carcinogenic and potentially genotoxic activity [1]. The list of dyes permitted in the European Union contains over 30 substances of which 12 are synthetic colorants [2].

Legal requirements and limitations regarding the application of food dyes have led to the development of several analytical techniques that enable the detection and quantification of these food additives. Liquid chromatography, including thin layer chromatography (TLC) in normal (NP) and reversed (RP) phase mode, has been successfully used to quantify food dyes in different matrices. Selected references on TLC methods proposed to separate and quantify permitted and illegal synthetic food dyes are listed in Table 1.

Table 1: Selected references on TLC separation and/or quantification of synthetic food dyes (including some illegal or delisted examples).

Dyes
Sorbent
Eluent
Detection method
Ref.

Amaranth, indigotine, tartrazine, Ponceau 4R, orange yellow, Allura Red, Brilliant Blue, food green 3
Silica gel RP18
Methanol-acetonitrile-5% aq.
Na₂SO₄ (3 : 3 : 10, v/v/v)
Methanol-butanone-5% aq.
Na₂SO₄ (1 : 1 : 1, v/v/v)
Densitometry
[14]

Detection of illegal dyes
RP-18
Methanol-acetonitrile-5% aq.
Na₂SO₄ (3 : 3 : 10, v/v/v)
Methanol-butanone-5% aq.
Na₂SO₄ (1 : 1 : 1, v/v/v)
Methanol-butanone-5% aq.
Na₂SO₄ (1 : 1 : 1, v/v/v)
Mass spectroscopy
[13]

Tartrazine, azorubine, orange yellow
NH₂
i-PrOH-Et₂O-NH₃ (2 : 1 : 1 v/v/v)
Video-scanning
[15]

Ponceau 4R, tartrazine, orange yellow
Silica gel 60
i-PrOH-NH₃-H₂O
(10 : 1 : 1 v/v/v)
Sorbent scraping, extraction, and spectrophotometry
[11]

Indigotine, Ponceau 4R, orange yellow, tartrazine, amaranth
MgO
Sodium citrate 15% aq.-methanol
(4 : 1 v/v)
Visual
[20]

Amaranth, tartrazine, orange yellow
Silica gel
n-butanol-ethanol-H₂O-NH₃(10 : 5 : 5 : 2 v/v/v/v)
Visual
[3]

Tartrazine, Allura Red
RP-18W
Methanol-citric buffer pH 3.5 (45 : 55 v/v)
Densitometry
[4]

Ponceau 4R
RP-18W
Tetrahydrofuran-acetic buffer pH 3.5 (45 : 55 v/v)

Brilliant Blue
CN
1,4-Dioxane-acetic buffer pH 3.5-H₂O (25 : 20 : 55 v/v/v) + 0.025 M sodium octane-1-sulfonate

Azorubine
RP-18W
Acetone-acetic buffer pH 3.5 (4 : 6 v/v)

Patent blue
CN
Tetrahydrofuran-acetic buffer pH 3.5-H₂O (25 : 20 : 55 v/v/v) + 0.025 M diethylamine
Densitometry
[4]

Quinoline yellow
RP-18W
1,4-Dioxane-acetic buffer pH 3.5 (1 : 9 v/v)

Amaranth, tartrazine, Brilliant Blue
Scolecite
Acetone
Visual
[21]

Silica gel G

Tartrazine, orange yellow, quinolone yellow, amaranth, Ponceau 6R, erythrosine, indigotine, Brilliant Blue, brilliant black
RP-18
Water-ethanol-(NH₄)₂SO₄ aq.
Water-acetone-(NH₄)₂SO₄ aq.
Visual
[22]

Fat soluble dyes
Al₂O₃
Petroleum ether-CCl₄ (1 : 1 v/v)
Visual
[8]

Starch impregnated with paraffin or vegetable oil
MeOH-H₂O-AcOH (80 : 15 : 5 v/v/v)

Water soluble dyes
Polyamide powder
NH₃-methanol-H₂O 5 : 15 : 80 (v/v/v)

Fat soluble dyes
Silica gel G
Benzene
Visual
[23]

Water soluble dyes
Silica gel G
i-BuOH-HCOOH-H₂O (25 : 10 : 10 v/v/v)

i-BuOH-AcOH-H₂O (25 : 10 : 10 v/v/v)

Butanone-methyl isobutyl ketone-AcOH-H₂O (20 : 10 : 10 : 5 v/v/v/v)

i-BuOH-i-PrOH-NH₃ aq. (1 : 1 : 1 v/v/v)

Butanone-pyridine-H₂O (4 : 1 : 1 v/v/v)

Naphthol yellow, tartrazine, Ponceau 4R, amaranth, erythrosine, rhodamine B, indigotine, patent blue
Silica gel G
EtOH-n-BuOH-H₂O (9 : 2 : 1 v/v/v)
Sorbent scraping, extraction, and spectrophotometry
[12]

Densitometry

Spectral reflectance

Tartrazine, orange yellow, amaranth, Ponceau SX, erythrosine, Allura Red, Brilliant Blue, food green 3
Silica gel 60
n-BuOH-AcOH-H₂O (4 : 1 : 5 v/v/v)
Densitometry
[5]

n-BuOH-EtOH-H₂O-NH₃ (10 : 5 : 5 : 2 v/v/v/v)

The actual determination of colorants in different food matrices was often preceded by the sample pretreatment stage including Solid Phase Extraction (SPE) on sorbents such as cellulose (cotton wool) [3], octadecyl-bonded silica (RP-18) [4–7], polyamide powder [8], alumina [9], polyurethane foam [10], or amino-modified silica (NH₂) [5]. Quantification of dyes, separated by TLC, was achieved by sorbent scraping, extraction, and spectrophotometric analysis of extracts [11, 12], mass spectroscopy [13], densitometry [4, 5, 12, 14], or software processing of images scanned with flatbed scanners [15–18].

The purpose of this study was to develop a new, easy, and rapid methodology that could be used to quantify the most common synthetic dyestuffs in liquid matrices such as beverages or mouthwashes using the cheapest possible chromatographic plates and a simple sample clean-up step.

2. Experimental

2.1. Chemicals, Materials, and Solutions

Food quality synthetic dyes, tartrazine (E102), orange yellow (E110), azorubine (E122), Ponceau 4R (E124), and Brilliant Blue (E133), were from Food Colours, Piotrków Trybunalski (Poland). Their purity was assessed spectrophotometrically according to [19]. Chloroform, isopropanol, 25% aq. ammonia, ethyl acetate, pyridine, glacial acetic acid, ethanol, 1,4-dioxane, n-butanol, acetone, methanol, toluene, triethanolamine, and sodium hydroxide were from Avantor (formerly Polskie Odczynniki Chemiczne), Gliwice (Poland). The preparations analyzed in this study were purchased locally (mouthwashes) or prepared by spiking a commercial, colorless isotonic drink with appropriate dyes at concentrations 0.15, 0.45, and 0.75 mgmL⁻¹. Standard solutions of dyes for TLC/densitometric analysis were prepared at the following concentrations (of pure dyes in distilled water): 0.03, 0.05, 0.15, 0.30, 0.50, 0.65, 0.80, 1.00, 1.10, 1.30, 1.45, and 1.60 mgmL⁻¹. The solutions for the standard addition VIS spectrophotometric determinations of E124 and E133 dyes in mouthwashes were prepared by aqueous (blue mouthwash) or ethanolic (red mouthwash) dilution of 5.0 mL mouthwash and the appropriate volume of the dye standard solution in a 10 mL volumetric flask. The volumes of standard solutions added to the subsequent flasks were 0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, and 1.0 mL and the concentrations of standard solutions were 0.15 mgmL⁻¹ (Ponceau 4R) and 0.16 mgmL⁻¹ (Brilliant Blue).

2.2. Solid Phase Extraction (SPE)

Solid Phase Extraction was conducted with a vacuum SPE apparatus from Bioanalytic, on CRONUS SPE NH₂ cartridges (200 mg/3 mL). SPE cartridges were conditioned with 2 × 3 mL methanol, loaded with the drink or mouthwash sample (10 mL of the product diluted with water to 50 mL), and washed with water (3 × 3 mL). The adsorbed dyes were desorbed by washing the sorbent with NaOH 0.01 molL⁻¹, collected in 5 mL volumetric flasks and diluted to volume with distilled water.

2.3. Thin Layer Chromatography

Thin layer chromatography was performed on 10 × 20 cm standard quality silica gel 60 plates (layer thickness 0.25 mm) from Merck. Plates were developed with methanol-dichloromethane 1 : 1 (v/v) and dried at room temperature overnight prior to use. Standard solutions prepared according to Section 2.1 and the solutions of dyes isolated by SPE (Section 2.2) were spotted with the Desaga AS30 sampler equipped with a 10 μL syringe (1 μLspot⁻¹), 15 mm from the plate bottom edge and at 8 mm intervals, starting 10 mm from the plate edge and developed with chloroform-isopropanol-25% aq. ammonia 1 : 3 : 1 (v/v/v) as mobile phase. Plates were developed in a vertical chromatographic chamber lined with filter paper and previously saturated with the mobile phase vapor for 20 min. The development distance was 75 mm from the plate bottom edge. After development, plates were dried at room temperature (20°C), scanned, and analyzed in reflectance mode with the Desaga CD 60 densitometer at appropriate wavelengths.

2.4. Spectrophotometric Determination of Food Dyes in Mouthwashes by Standard Addition Method

Spectroscopic measurements were performed with the Lambda 25 UV/VIS spectrophotometer, Perkin-Elmer. Samples of mouthwashes prepared according to Section 2.1 were placed in 1 cm quartz glass cuvettes and scanned over the wavelength range 400–700 nm with the 1 nm resolution. The analytical wavelengths were 514 nm (red mouthwash) and 634 nm (blue mouthwash). Absorbances for both series of mouthwash solutions were plotted against the concentrations of the added standards and the dye concentrations without the standard addition were obtained by extrapolation of linear plots:

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Method Development

3.1.1. Solid Phase Extraction

Liquid matrices such as beverages, drops, mouthwashes, and pharmaceutical preparations often have physicochemical properties that make their direct analysis by chromatographic or spectroscopic techniques impossible even after dilution. Their relatively high viscosity, opacity, and complex composition are the reasons why the analysis of food dyes in such samples is often a two-step process involving some isolation process prior to the actual analysis. Synthetic food dyes including those analyzed in our study have been isolated from drinks and drops by SPE on the supports such as RP-18 [4–7], cotton wool [3], polyurethane foam [10], or aminopropyl-bonded silica [5]. We have decided to use the commercial SPE columns filled with NH₂-modified silica, recommended for normal phase extraction of polar compounds and as a weak anion exchanger (WAX) for organic anions to which the food colorants quantified in our study also belong. The of the NH₂ functional group is around 9.8. When this sorbent is supposed to be used as an anion exchanger, the sample must be applied at a pH at least 2 units below 9.8. The pH must be at such a level that the anionic compound of interest is also charged (2 pH units above its own ). The elution of the anionic analyte from the sorbent may be achieved by either of three approaches: (i) neutralization of the analyte (2 pH units below its ); (ii) neutralization of the ionized aminopropyl group (2 pH units above its ); (iii) adding a different anion that competes with the analyte.

The aminopropyl-bonded silica SPE isolation of food dyes reported in [5] was based on the approach (i) with anionic food dyes neutralized with ethanolic sulfuric acid. We have, however, decided to try approach (ii) or (iii). According to our earlier research, the recovery of food colorants covered by our study from the aminopropyl-bonded silica is possible with aqueous sodium hydroxide or diluted solutions of organic basis including water soluble amines (e.g., triethanolamine, imidazole, morpholine, or 2-amine-2-methyl-1-propanol) [24]. Alternatively, we have used pH 7.4 phosphate buffered saline with added methanol. The selection of possible conditions used for the recovery of food dyes from the NH₂ sorbent is broad and we have observed that, by careful optimization of this step, it is possible to reach a certain level of selectivity useful if the actual quantification step is based on the UV/VIS spectrophotometry. However, when the analysis involves the chromatographic separation (as it was the case in our study), selectivity of the extraction step is not crucial and the elution may be achieved easily and quickly with diluted aqueous sodium hydroxide.

3.1.2. Chromatographic and Densitometric Conditions

The synthetic dyes analyzed throughout this study are, from the structural point of view, sodium salts of strong (sulfonic) acids (Figure 1). On the basis of the literature data and our experience [25, 26] it was expected that such compounds, when subjected to classical RP chromatography, may exhibit low affinity to the stationary phase and tend to travel near the solvent front. It is, of course, possible to modify the RP retention of such dyes with additives such as aqueous ammonium sulfate [13, 14, 22] or suitable acidic buffers [4] but in our research we have opted for the NP chromatography or its modification known to us from our earlier research, that is, some form of Hydrophilic Interaction Liquid Chromatography- (HILIC-) type separation on the simple, cheap, and readily available unmodified silica. In order to optimize the chromatographic separation process several mobile phases have been analyzed and the values obtained for the selected examples are presented in Table 2.

Table 2: values of food dyes, selected mobile phases.

Azorubine
0.50
0.62
0.28
0.77
0.43
0.34
0.42
0.47
0.58
0.74
>0.95
0.91
>0.95
0.75
0.70
0.92
0.63
0.49
0.88
0.88

Tartrazine
0.21
0.36
0
0.61
0.08
0.11
0.04
0.12
0.25
0.50
>0.95
0.89
>0.95
0.44
0.42
0.45
0.28
0.06
0.70
0.78

Ponceau 4R
0.20
0.40
0
0.63
0.06
0.15
0.07
0.20
0.30
0.56
>0.95
0.89
>0.95
0.48
0.59
0.49
0.21
0.13
0.73
0.75

Brilliant Blue
0.37
0.43
0
0.64
0.19
0.16
0.17
0.33
0.37
0.56
>0.95
0.89
>0.95
0.43
0.74
0.56
0.30
0.19
0.64
0.73

Orange yellow
0.48
0.60
0.11
0.75
0.42
0.29
0.35
0.44
0.54
0.69
>0.95
0.91
>0.95
0.76
0.80
0.82
0.59
0.42
0.85
0.91

-i-PrOH-NH₃ 25% aq. (1 : 3 : 1 v/v/v); ²EtOAc-pyridine-H₂O (11 : 5 : 4 v/v/v); ³CHCl₃-i-PrOH-AcOH (2 : 6 : 1 v/v/v); ⁴EtOAc-pyridine-H₂O (2 : 1 : 1 v/v/v); ⁵CHCl₃-i-PrOH-NH₃ 25% aq. (2 : 6 : 1 v/v/v); ⁶EtOAc-pyridine-H₂O (12 : 5 : 3 v/v/v); ⁷CHCl₃-i-PrOH-H₂O (2 : 6 : 1 v/v/v); ⁸CHCl₃-i-PrOH-H₂O (1 : 3 : 1 v/v/v); ⁹(a) CHCl₃-i-PrOH-H₂O (2 : 6 : 1 v/v/v); (b) EtOAc-pyridine-H₂O (11 : 5 : 4 v/v/v); ¹⁰EtOAc-EtOH-H₂O (75 : 35 : 30 v/v/v); ¹¹1,4-dioxane-H₂O (2 : 1 v/v); ¹²EtOH-n-butanol-H₂O (9 : 1 : 2 v/v/v); ¹³Acetone-MeOH-NH₃ 25% aq. (8 : 4 : 1 v/v/v); ¹⁴EtOAc-MeOH-H₂O-AcOH (65 : 33 : 11 : 1); ¹⁵MeOH-toluene (11 : 9 v/v); ¹⁶MeOH-toluene-AcOH (55 : 40 : 5 v/v/v); ¹⁷EtOAc-EtOH-NH₃ 25% aq. (75 : 45 : 15 v/v/v); ¹⁸EtOAc-i-PrOH-H₂O (75 : 35 : 30 v/v/v); ¹⁹EtOAc-MeOH-H₂O-triethanolamine (65 : 33 : 11 : 1 v/v/v/v); ²⁰i-PrOH-NH₃ 25% aq. (8 : 3 v/v).

Figure 1: Structures of dyes E102, E110, E122, E124, and E133.

The complete TLC separation of all dyes under investigation with a single mobile phase is not an easy task (as we knew from the literature [5, 21] and have soon found out from our own experience) and we were not entirely happy with any chromatographic system tested at this point of our study. Luckily, it is highly unlikely that as many as five dyes are used in a single preparation so it is our suggestion that a different mobile phase should be used depending on the combination of dyes present in a particular formulation. Azorubine/orange yellow and tartrazine/Ponceau 4R are two pairs of dyes that seem to be particularly difficult to separate on silica gel 60 and if any of these pairs is present we recommend using solvent system 3 (for azorubine/orange yellow), 8, or 17 (for tartrazine/Ponceau 4R). Solvent systems 15 and 18 can be used as the most universal mobile phases but the separation quality achieved for system 18 is just borderline and in the case of system 15 separation of azorubine/Brilliant Blue and orange yellow/Brilliant Blue may be incomplete. This is, however, a minor problem since the absorption ranges of dyes belonging to these pairs do not overlap (Figure 2) and their simultaneous densitometric quantification is possible in spite of the incomplete separation.

Figure 2: Multiwavelength scans of studied dyes.

The analytical wavelengths selected on the basis of multiwavelength densitometric scanning were as follows: tartrazine 420 nm; orange yellow 460 nm; azorubine 500 nm; Ponceau 4R 500 nm; Brilliant Blue 620 nm.

3.2. Validation

3.2.1. Calibration Plots

Standard solutions of dyes prepared according to Section 2.1 were spotted on chromatographic plates and developed according to Section 2.3. Chromatograms were developed and scanned according to Section 2.3 and the surfaces of chromatographic peaks were plotted against the amount of dyes. The linear and quadratic calibrating plots were generated and compared by means of values and nonnumerical analysis of residues according to [27] (Figure 3). It was concluded that the quadratic calibration lines give a better fit and the resulting equations are presented in Table 3.

Table 3: Regression coefficients () with confidence intervals. Analytical wavelengths selected on the basis of densitometric scanning (Figure 2).

(95%, 10)
(95%, 10)
(95%, 10)

LOQ

µgspot⁻¹

Orange yellow

0.9978
0.09

Azorubine

0.9992
0.08

Brilliant Blue

0.9993
0.06

Ponceau 4R

0.9982
0.07

Tartrazine

0.9971
0.04

Figure 3: Comparison of residues for linear and quadratic calibration plots.

3.2.2. Limit of Quantification (LOQ)

The quantification limits of our method is difficult to determine. The limits for the TLC/densitometry step, determined according to [27] (Section  4.8.a) are given in Table 3 but the SPE sample pretreatment step makes it possible to concentrate the analytes, as we have estimated earlier, by two orders of magnitude, depending on the size of the SPE column and the composition of the eluent, with the experiment timing as the main limitation (sample flow rate through the sorbent must not be too high to ensure the complete adsorption of the analyte). Taking into consideration the size of SPE columns that we have used and the extraction time we have estimated the overall LOQ at ca. 1 mgL⁻¹ or less.

3.2.3. Specificity

Reflectance UV/VIS spectra of the dyes isolated from analyzed samples and processed chromatographically were obtained directly from the TLC spots (three different places within each spot) and compared to those of the standards to prove the identity and purity of dyes separated by SPE and thin layer chromatography.

3.2.4. Precision and Accuracy

Precision of the proposed method was tested on two levels: repeatability and intermediate precision ([27], Sections  4.5.1 and  4.5.2). The method accuracy was tested according to [27] (Section  4.6), using spiked drink samples (Table 4) and real mouthwash samples, simultaneously analyzed by UV/VIS spectrophotometry according to the procedure, described in Section 2.4 (Table 5).

Table 4: Dye contents in spiked preparations determined by SPE/TLC/densitometry.

Dye
Expected dye content
Recovered dye content
CV [%]
Recovery [%]

µgµL⁻¹
µgµL⁻¹

Blue drink
E133
0.15
0.14
3.1
93.3

0.45
0.41
2.7
91.1

0.75
0.73
3.3
97.3

Red drink
E122
0.15
0.14
1.6
93.3

0.45
0.42
2.5
93.3

0.75
0.71
3.0
94.7

Red drink
E124
0.15
0.13
4.1
86.7

0.45
0.43
2.9
95.6

0.75
0.72
2.3
96.0

Yellow drink
E110
0.15
0.14
2.8
93.3

0.45
0.42
3.2
93.3

0.75
0.74
2.7
98.7

Yellow drink
E102
0.15
0.13
3.3
86.7

0.45
0.42
2.9
93.3

0.75
0.73
3.4
97.3

Table 5: Dye concentrations in real samples determined by UV/VIS spectrophotometry or SPE followed by TLC/densitometry.

Dye
UV/VIS
TLC/densitometry
TLC/densitometry

Day 1, Analyst 1
Day 2, Analyst 2

Dye content
µgmL⁻¹
Dye content
µgmL⁻¹
CV [%]
Recovery [%]
Dye content
µgmL⁻¹
CV [%]
Recovery [%]

Blue mouthwash
E133
8.6
7.7
2.23
89.5
7.8
3.62
90.7

Red mouthwash
E124
28.0
26.0
1.02
92.3
25.6
1.89
91.4

A colorless drink, containing water, sugar, citric acid, magnesium, sodium citrate, natural lemon flavor, potassium sorbate, dimethyl dicarbonate, ester gum, and vitamins B1, B6, B12, and E, was spiked with dyes at 3 levels of concentrations (0.15, 0.45, and 0.75 mgmL⁻¹). 10 mL samples of the drink were analyzed according to Sections 2.2 and 2.3. Dye recoveries and coefficients of variation (CV) are given in Table 4.

Two brands of analyzed, commercial mouthwashes (red and blue) had the following compositions:

(1)Red mouthwash: glycerin, ethanol, water, benzyl alcohol, chlorhexidine, chlorobutanol, citral, citronellol, sodium docusate, eugenol, limonene, linalool, menthol, and E124.(2)Blue mouthwash: water, ethanol, sodium benzoate, cocamidopropyl betaine, sodium saccharine, zinc chloride, propylene glycol, sodium fluoride, olaflur, sodium chloride, glycerin, and E133.

The results of spectrophotometric and chromatographic analyses of commercial mouthwashes are given in Table 5.

4. Conclusion

The proposed method of isolation and quantification of food dyes is easy, accurate, and precise enough for the routine analysis of the most widely used colorants in liquid matrices. Other components of liquid preparations, including surfactants, vitamins, preservatives, and flavors, do not interfere. Due to the possibility of using different SPE and TLC eluents tested in our study, the proposed method has a high potential for further developments, including colorants other than the aforementioned ones, analysis of complex dye mixtures, and matrices of different composition.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this manuscript.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by an internal grant of the Medical University of Lodz no. 503/3-016-03/503-31-001.

References

K. Golka, S. Kopps, and Z. W. Myslak, “Carcinogenicity of azo colorants: influence of solubility and bioavailability,” Toxicology Letters, vol. 151, no. 1, pp. 203–210, 2004.

Directive 94/36/WE of European Parliament and Council on colors for use in foodstuffs.

H. T. McKone and G. J. Nelson, “Separation and identification of some FD&C dyes by TLC,” Journal of Chemical Education, vol. 53, article 722, 1976.

T. Tuzimski, “Determination of sulfonated water-soluble azo dyes in foods by SPE coupled with HPTLC-DAD,” Journal of Planar Chromatography - Modern TLC, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 281–289, 2011.

S. M. Anderton, C. D. Incarvito, and J. Sherma, “Determination of natural and synthetic colors in alcoholic and non alcoholic beverages by quantitative HPTLC,” Journal of Liquid Chromatography & Related Technologies, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 101–110, 1997.

Automation of AOAC 988.13 for the Identification of FD&C Color Additives in Foods using Solid Phase Extraction. Gilson Inc., Middelton Application Note FB0112, May 2012.

M. González, M. Gallego, and M. Valcárcel, “Liquid chromatographic determination of natural and synthetic colorants in lyophilized foods using an automatic solid-phase extraction system,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 51, no. 8, pp. 2121–2129, 2003.

J. Davídek and G. Janíček, “Thin layer-chromatographic separation of fat soluble and water soluble food dyes,” Qualitas Plantarum et Materiae Vegetabiles, vol. 16, no. 1-4, pp. 253–257, 1968.

P. Qi, T. Zeng, Z. Wen, X. Liang, and X. Zhang, “Interference-free simultaneous determination of Sudan dyes in chili foods using solid phase extraction coupled with HPLC-DAD,” Food Chemistry, vol. 125, no. 4, pp. 1462–1467, 2011.

E. C. Vidotti, J. C. Cancino, C. C. Oliveira, and M. D. C. E. Rollemberg, “Simultaneous determination of food dyes by first derivative spectrophotometry with sorption onto polyurethane foam,” Analytical Sciences, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 149–153, 2005.

S. Sayar and Y. Özdemir, “First-derivative spectrophotometric determination of ponceau 4R, sunset yellow and tartrazine in confectionery products,” Food Chemistry, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 367–372, 1998.

S. J. Lyle and M. S. Tehrani, “Thin-layer chromatographic separation and subsequent determination of some water-soluble dyestuffs,” Journal of Chromatography A, vol. 175, no. 1, pp. 163–168, 1979.

H. Oka, Y. Ikaia, T. Ohno et al., “Identification of unlawful food dyes by thin-layer chromatography-fast atom bombardment mass spectrometry,” Journal of Chromatography A, vol. 674, no. 1-2, pp. 301–307, 1994.

H. Oka, Y. Ikai, N. Kawamura et al., “Simple method for the analysis of food dyes on reversed-phase thin-layer plates,” Journal of Chromatography A, vol. 411, no. C, pp. 437–444, 1987.

F. Soponar, A. C. Moţ, and C. Sârbu, “Quantitative determination of some food dyes using digital processing of images obtained by thin-layer chromatography,” Journal of Chromatography A, vol. 1188, no. 2, pp. 295–300, 2008.

A. V. Gerasimov, “Qualitative and Quantitative treatment of thin-layer chromatograms of incompletely separated synthetic food colors,” Journal of Analytical Chemistry, vol. 55, no. 12, pp. 1161–1165, 2000.

A. V. Gerasimov, “Use of computer-assisted color treatment of chromatograms in the TLC determination of tartrazine,” Journal of Analytical Chemistry, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 209-210, 2003.

A. V. Gerasimov, “Use of the software processing of scanned chromatogram images in quantitative planar chromatography,” Journal of Analytical Chemistry, vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 348–353, 2004.

K. S. Minioti, C. F. Sakellariou, and N. S. Thomaidis, “Determination of 13 synthetic food colorants in water-soluble foods by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with diode-array detector,” Analytica Chimica Acta, vol. 583, no. 1, pp. 103–110, 2007.

J. Masłowska, “A new chromatographic method for the separation of food dye mixtures on thin MgO layers,” Chromatographia, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 99–101, 1985.

P. K. Shrivastava and R. Prakash, “Thin layer chromatographic separation of a few food dyes over scolecite as a new adsorbent,” Chromatographia, vol. 21, no. 11, pp. 655-656, 1986.

D. M. Milojković-Opsenica, K. Lazarević, V. Ivačković, and Ž. L. Tešić, “Reversed-phase thin-layer chromatography of some foodstuff dyes,” Journal of Planar Chromatography - Modern TLC, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 276–279, 2003.

J. Rai, “Separation and identification of water soluble and fat soluble food dyes by thin layer chromatography,” Chromatographia, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 211–213, 1971.

A. W. Sobańska, J. Krzemiński, P. Jakubczyk, and E. Brzezińska, “Oznaczanie zawartości syntetycznych barwników spożywczych w płukankach do jamy ustnej przy pomocy spektrofotometrii UV/VIS lub ekstrakcji do fazy stałej i chromatografii cienkowarstwowej/densytometrii,” Współczesna Analityka Farmaceutyczna i Biomedyczna w Ochronie Zdrowia, Poznań, 17-18.09.2015.

A. W. Sobanska and J. Pyzowski, “Simultaneous multiple-development HPTLC quantification of water- and oil-soluble sunscreens,” Journal of Planar Chromatography - Modern TLC, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 344–348, 2012.

A. W. Sobańska and E. Brzezińska, “Strategies of sunscreen separation by thin layer chromatography,” Acta Poloniae Pharmaceutica: Drug Research, vol. 69, no. 5, pp. 791–797, 2012.

B. Renger, Z. Végh, and K. Ferenczi-Fodor, “Validation of thin layer and high performance thin layer chromatographic methods,” Journal of Chromatography A, vol. 1218, no. 19, pp. 2712–2721, 2011.