Metro Train Stopping Scheme Decision Based on Multisource Data in Express-Local Train Mode

,


Introduction
Te confict between the substantial travel demand of urban residents and the limited road trafc resources is intensifying and exacerbated by people's growing time consciousness.Congested road trafc conditions signifcantly undermine residents' travel experience.Te subway has become the preferred mode of transportation for most residents due to its safety, efciency, comfort, and speed.As a high-capacity means of transport, which does not occupy surface transportation resources, the subway has also become an integral component of transportation infrastructure development in major cities and is widely employed to alleviate pressure on ground transportation systems.Simultaneously, China's rapid urbanization necessitates continuous expansion of city boundaries and prompts the transition from a "single center" to a "multicenter" model.Tese developments and changes inevitably impose new requirements on public transportation systems and continue to rise long-haul passengers' travel demands steadily.Te characteristics of passenger travel demand and fow distribution on longdistance rail transit lines difer signifcantly from those observed on existing rail transit lines.Compared with traditional urban rail transit station operations involving frequent stops, implementing fast and slow train stopping schemes can better cater to the travel needs of long-haul passengers.
To solve this problem, scholars at home and abroad have made the following typical studies on train operation schemes.Cury et al. [1] applied train operation schemes to the feld of urban rail transit frstly.Before that, the research on train operation schemes was limited to the feld of railway transportation, and the research content was the optimization of train numbers and departure intervals.Smrek [2] summarized the analytical techniques, operational models, and planning objectives applicable to the operation and organization of urban rail transit.Assis and Milani [3] proposed a method for calculating the optimal train schedule of subway lines based on a linear programming model, considering the time variation of passenger demand and line operating conditions.Wang et al. [4] considered various constraints in the actual train operation, established a multiobjective mixed integer nonlinear programming model, and obtained the dynamic train schedule and train turnover plan.
For the study of the operation scheme of the single interchange and cross-station parking mode, Niu et al. [5] proposed a quadratic integer programming model with linear constraints to meet the dynamic OD demand based on the cross-station stopping mode and minimize passenger waiting time and obtained the train schedule.Zhang et al. [6] analyzed time-varying passenger demand, proposed a fexible transit scheme that reduced the average travel time of passengers, and found the optimal scheme based on the genetic algorithm.Cao et al. [7] proposed a comprehensive evaluation model suitable for the express train mode, aiming at shortening the train running time and reducing the passenger waiting time and travel time, and the 0-1 integer programming model was established and solved by the Tabu algorithm and obtained the optimal train running scheme.Lee et al. [8] classifed passengers according to starting and ending points and transfer choices, set up a coordination model of fast and local train modes with the goal of the shortest passenger travel time, designed a genetic algorithm, and obtained the optimal combination scheme of the fast and local train.Zhang et al. [9] proposed a timetable optimization model aiming at minimizing the total waiting time of passengers and solved it by genetic algorithm.Tang and Xu [10] established a double-layer programming model for the train operation scheme of suburban rail transit lines and designed a hybrid algorithm combining G-SA and MSA.Niu et al. [11] analyzed the problem of matching between the time-varying passenger fow demand and passenger waiting time and between trains and running routes in terms of the formulation and algorithm application of the train operation plan with the single route and all-station stopping mode, established a model with the goal of minimizing the passenger waiting time, and adopted the genetic algorithm.Deng et al. [12] constructed the elastic demand function of passenger travel, established a multiobjective double-layer programming model, and designed a simulated annealing algorithm.Based on IC card data, Zheng and Jin [13] proposed a new subway operation plan formulation method and obtained a departure plan that was closer to the passenger fow demand.Zhao et al. [14] established an integer linear programming model based on time-varying section requirements and predetermined service levels and used the two-stage method to solve the fnal train running plan.Based on AFC data, Yang et al. [15] proposed comprehensive optimization to formulate route plans and schedules.A mixed integer nonlinear programming model was established and solved by the improved NSGA-II.
In terms of the parallel operation of fast and local trains, Liu et al. [16] analyzed a line of rapid rail transit in Shanghai and discussed the reasonable crossing station location and siding setting.Sun et al. [17] established a double-layer programming model for fast and local train operation schemes.Te upper layer model took the minimization of the passenger travel time and train turnover time as the target, and the lower layer model was the passenger fow allocation model, and it was solved by the particle swarm optimization algorithm.Zheng et al. [18] established a 0-1 integer programming model with the goal of maximizing the overall travel time of passengers under the cross-station parking mode and solved it by the Tabu search algorithm.
In summary, most studies primarily focus on designing subway operation schemes by designing operational routing, stopping schemes, optimization models, and model-solving algorithms.Most studies ignore the importance of input data, and the input data are often only single OD survey data or data obtained from the automated fare collection system (AFC) or prediction data derived from the aforementioned sources without considering the infuence of land use and other factors on passenger fow trends.As a result, the designed optimization scheme is only suitable for the passenger fow in the input period of the model but not for the actual passenger fow generated by the line.Part of the reason is that data from single source cannot fully refect the characteristics of the passenger fow.Tere is also a part of the factor that the passenger fow has a certain randomness and volatility, and the passenger fow data input to the model cannot capture the overall trend of passenger fows over a long period of time, and the smaller the amount of data, the greater the deviation.As urban centers continue to develop and grow in size, it has become increasingly evident that land use planning along subway stations signifcantly infuences the passenger fow distribution, resulting in tidal passenger fows becoming a common occurrence.To address this issue caused by the uneven distribution of residential and employment lands, this study focuses on a specifc subway line and proposes a train stopping scheme based on fast and local train modes.Multiple sources of data including AFC data, point of interest (POI) data, and real estate website data are collected for analysis purposes.Based on these datasets, an optimization model for the train stopping scheme is established with objectives of minimizing both the passenger travel time and system-generalized cost functions under various operational constraints.Te NAGA-II algorithm with the elite strategy is employed.Te proposed method is validated using Changchun Metro Line 1 as an illustrative example.Te main contributions of this paper are as follows: (1) Utilizing multisource data including the POI data, real estate website data, AFC data, and passenger survey questionnaire; a spatial weight function is introduced to obtain the land use index refecting the distribution characteristics of the passenger fow.
Based on these data, the express-local train stopping plan can be designed that adapts to the overall trend of the passenger fow without requiring extensive analysis or prediction.(2) An optimization model for train stopping schemes is established by analyzing characteristics of the passenger fow distribution as well as passengers' choice behavior.Tis model determines the optimal proportion of fast and slow trains and maximizes limited resources while improving quality of service and travel efciency.
Te remainder of this paper is organized as follows.Section 2 provides detailed descriptions of issues studied, Section 3 establishes an optimization model for the train stopping scheme and designs the NSGA-II algorithm to solve it, Section 4 presents empirical research results regarding optimal ratios between fast and slow trains followed by discussion, and fnally, Section 5 summarizes thesis fndings while proposing future research directions.

Train Stopping Strategy.
Te train stopping plan specifes the stopping mode and stopping station.General urban rail transit train stops are mainly divided into two categories: one is all-station stopping mode and the other is the expresslocal train cross-station operation scheme.Local trains stop at every station to cater to the short-haul passenger fow and enhance operational accessibility.Express trains only stop at stations with high intensity of passenger fow, signifcantly reducing the travel time for long-haul passengers while also alleviating congestion on local trains as quickly as possible.

Classifcation of Passengers.
From the point of passengers, they do not need to choose what kind of trains to take when running the all-station stopping mode.Passengers with diferent origins and destinations will choose the frst train they encounter.When the express and local train modes are operated, passengers need to make a decision on whether to board the express train or the local train, and diferent decisions result in diferent travel times for passengers with the same origins and destinations.So, according to the origin and destination, passengers are divided into fve categories: P1, P2, P3, P4, and P5.A is defned as the express station, and B is defned as the local station.Te routes of the fve categories of passengers are shown in Table 1.
For P3 and P4 passengers, if their origins and destinations are close (<5 km) or there are no transfer opportunities available, most of them will choose to take the local direct train.However, P3 long-haul passengers will board the express train when it arrives and then transfer if necessary.Tey may also opt to directly board a local train when one is available.Nevertheless, passengers often have low desire or demand for transfers.Tus, those with diferent types of departure and destination stations tend to choose the local direct train more frequently.So, P3, P4, and P5 can be classifed into one category according to their choice behavior.As for P1, whether they take the express train or the local train, the on-board time is the same.However, for P2, diferent choice behaviors correspond to diferent on-board times, and the on-board time of choosing to take the express train will be signifcantly less than that of taking the local train.Terefore, P1 and P2 belong to two categories.With the previous one, there are three categories fnally, L1, L2, and L3.L1: Passengers whose departure and destination stations are both express stations, and both the express stations are adjacent.L2: Passengers whose departure and destination stations are both express stations, and both the express stations are not adjacent.L3: Local direct passengers.

Analysis of Passenger Travel Time.
Te travel time consists of the on-board time and the waiting time.Te travel time is analyzed separately according to the classifcation of passengers, and the ratio of express to local trains is set as 1: n; the arrival of passengers is evenly distributed, so the average waiting time is half of the departure interval, the duration of a cycle is T, the pairs of the express train is D f , and the pairs of the local train is D s .For L1 and L2 passengers, their waiting time t wf is expressed as follows: For L3 passengers who choose a local train, the waiting time t ws is Te on-board time includes three parts: the running time, the stopping time, and the start-stop additional time consumed during starting and braking.Te on-board time t in is given as follows: Journal of Advanced Transportation where t od is the pure running time between the origin and destination; t stop is the stopping time; t qt is the start-stop additional time; a s is 0-1 decision variable, if the train stops at s station, a s � 1, otherwise, a s � 0. L1 passengers on-board time is given as follows: L2 passenger have two types of routes: express direct and local direct.Express direct t L21 in is shown in formula ( 5) and local direct t L22 in is shown in formula ( 6):

L3 passengers on-board time t L3
in is given as follows:

Model Construction and Solution
3.1.Processing of Multisource Data.Te stopping scheme for the express-local train is designed based on the multisource data.Te data used in this paper include AFC data, POI data, real estate website data, and questionnaire data.

Preprocessing of AFC Data.
Te AFC system stores nine items of valid information on the passenger rail transit travel, including the date, ticket card number, station name, transaction type, credit card time, etc.By processing the relevant information, the spatial and temporal distribution characteristics of the passenger fow and the OD table of passengers joining the transfer can be obtained, shown in Table 2.

Amap POI Data.
Each POI contains four aspects of information: name, category, coordinates, and land use nature.Considering the scope impact of the TOD mode, it takes the subway station as the center and the bufer range within European distance of 800 m of the surrounding as the research scope.Te POI data are collected and sorted through Python to obtain the land use information near the station.
3.1.3.Real Estate Website Data.Te data of "Fangtianxia" and "Lianjia201d" real estate websites are crawled through Python to obtain the distance, number of households, and foor area information of residential land and ofce land and to estimate the number of employees or residents near the site.Match the real estate website data with the POI data, and input the information into the Excel if the information is successfully matched.Due to the limited information uploaded by the real estate website, there is a part of the property information missing.For POI with this situation, the foor area, number of buildings, and foor height of POI are recorded, and then, the number of households is estimated according to the height of each foor of 3 meters and each household of 100 square meters, and fnally, the data are entered into the Excel.
For the estimation of the number of employees in ofce buildings, the building area can be used for calculation.Te used area is calculated according to 60% of the building area, and the per capita ofce area is calculated according to 10 square meters to estimate the number of employees.which are given in Table 3.

Passenger Travel Characteristics Survey Questionnaire
Data.Trough a survey questionnaire, the basic travel characteristics data of subway passengers, such as the travel purpose, travel time, travel cost, and frequency of rail transit travel, are obtained.
Te processing of multisource data involves data layer fusion based on the POI data and real estate information data, so as to obtain ofce and residence indices refecting land use characteristics.Cluster analysis is then conducted on stations using the station passenger collector-distributor volume abstracted from the AFC data and land use index to determine the stopping mode, which belongs to the feature layer fusion.Finally, the train operation scheme model is established by inputting the stopping scheme and OD matrix, obtaining feasible schemes.Before determining the fnal train stopping plan, the survey questionnaire data and the potential stopping plan are integrated at the decisionmaking level.Te data fusion process is shown in Figure 1.

Multisource Data Fusion Based on Spatial Weight
Function.Te spatial weight function ω in the geographical weighted regression model is introduced in the analysis of land use around the station, and the data from the real estate website are integrated.Te principle is that the closer the things are, the closer they are to each other (Tobler's frst law of geography), and the closer the distance, the greater the where p ijlive is the number of households in the residential interest point ij, d ij is the distance between i and j, and h is the window width Te ofce index ω iwork of site i is given as follows: where p ijwork is the number of employees in the ofce interest point ij.
Te standardized residence index, ofce index, and passenger fow data are given in Table 4. Stations 121, 128, and 135 are the terminal stations and transfer stations, which must be the stopping stations.To eliminate the interference of abnormal data, the data of stations 121, 128, and 135 are cleared.

Model Establishment.
Te research focuses on a bidirectional single rail transit line without siding tracks during peak hours, and turn-back of trains is not considered.A multiobjective optimization model is established to minimize the total travel time cost of passengers and the operating cost of enterprises.Considering a series of driving conditions, the optimal pairs of express trains and local trains, and the stopping sequence of express trains are obtained.Te parameters and variables involved in the model are given in Tables 5 and 6.
Te assumptions of the model are as follows: (1) All the passengers between express stations take express trains when available; otherwise, they will take local trains.
Te passenger travel time includes the passenger waiting time and on-board time According to the passenger classifcation method, the number of diferent types of passengers is determined as follows.
Te number of L1 passengers Te number of L2 passengers Te number of L3 passengers

Waiting Time. L1 passengers waiting time
L2 passengers waiting time L3 passengers waiting time Total passenger waiting time T w � q 1 T w1 + q 2 T w2 + q 3 T w3 . (18)

On-Board Time. L1 passengers
L2 passengers L3 passengers 6 Journal of Advanced Transportation Passengers' total on-board time

Objective 2. Minimum train operating costs
Te cost changes brought about by this model only involve the additional cost of stops, so the second objective is expressed as follows: Te driving condition constraints are as follows: Formula (26) represents the constraint on the stopping sequence of express trains; it stipulates that express trains must stop at the start and end stations and across one stop at the whole line at least.Formulas (27), (28), and (29) represent the constraint on the range of departure frequency; the departure frequency of the express train is greater than that of the local train.Formula (30) is the constraint of the section load rate; formula (31) is the constraint of the number of stops of the express train, and formulas (32), (33), and (34) are the constraints of the departure interval.

Model Solving.
Te multiple objectives of the optimization model are contradictory.Generally, one goal enhancement is accompanied by the performance degradation of another one, so no solution can make each goal reach the optimal solution, but a set of multiple optimal solutions, that is, the Pareto optimal solution set.In essence, the traditional solving methods convert the multiple objective functions by linear weighting into a single objective problem.Te defect of this method is that the dimensions between the optimization objectives are difcult to be unifed, and the value of the weight of each objective function remains to be discussed.Terefore, from the perspective that there are multiple satisfactory solutions for the subobjective solution of the multiobjective optimization model, it solves the Pareto solution set of the stopping scheme by using the binary coded express stopping scheme and the nondominated sorting NAGA-II algorithm with the elite strategy and analyzes each solution from the perspective of the potential stopping scheme and beneft.Finally, the optimal solution of the train stopping scheme and running pairs is obtained.Te algorithm steps are as follows: Step 1: Initialize the population and set the evolutionary algebra Gen � 1.
Step 2: Determine whether the frst generation of subpopulation is generated; if it is generated, the evolutionary algebra Gen � 2; otherwise, the initial population is generated by nondominated ordering and selection, crossover, and mutation to generate the frst generation of subpopulation, and the evolutionary algebra Gen � 2.
Step 3: Combine the parent population with the child population to form a new population.
Step 4: Determine whether a new parent population has been generated; if not, calculate the objective function of the individuals in the new population, and perform operations such as fast nondominated sorting, calculation of crowding degree, and elite strategy to generate a new parent population.Otherwise, proceed to step 5.
Step 5: Select, cross, and mutate the parent population to generate the ofspring population.
Step 6: Determine whether Gen is equal to the largest evolutionary algebra; if not, then evolutionary algebra Gen � Gen + 1 and return to step 3. Otherwise, the run ends.

Time Distribution of Passenger Flow. Te maximum section passenger fow distribution of Changchun Rail
Transit Line 1 is shown in Figure 3.
As can be seen from Figure 3, the maximum section passenger fow of this line presents a bimodal distribution, showing an obvious morning and evening peak at 7:00-9:00 and 17:00-19:00.

Section Distribution of Passenger Flow. Te section distribution of passenger fow for Changchun Rail Transit
Line 1 in the morning peak is shown in Figure 4.
(1) Direction unbalance coefcient It can be seen from Figure 4 that in the morning peak hours, the distribution of section passenger fow up and down is "convex font," that is, the section passenger fow at two ends of the line is small, and the section passenger fow in the middle is large.Overall, the passenger fow in the upward direction is slightly larger than that in the downward direction.Passenger fow direction unbalance coefcient: Te direction unbalance coefcient of this line is 1.07, and the closer it is to 1, the more balanced the distribution of upstream and downstream passenger fow, so the passenger fow of this line is more balanced in the direction.(2) Section unbalance coefcient Te distribution of cross-section passenger fow on the station can be described by the unbalance coefcient of the passenger fow cross-section, as shown in Figure 5. Te section unbalance coefcient of the passenger fow section exceeds 1.5 in both the upward and downward directions, and the passenger fow shows obvious fuctuation in space.

Distribution of Passenger Collector-Distributor Volume
(1) Passenger collector-distributor volume of each station: Te passenger fow of each station in the morning peak is shown in Figure 6.
As can be seen from Figure 6, at Stations 121, 122, 123, 124, and 134, the number of passengers getting on is much higher than that getting of, while at Stations 126, 127, and 129, the number of passengers getting of is much higher than that getting on, and the diference between the number of passengers getting on and of at Station 127 is particularly obvious.Te number of passengers getting on and getting of at Station 128 is much higher than that at other stations.Combined with the analysis of the land use near the metro line, it can be preliminarily judged that Stations 127 and 128 are located in the city center, Station 127 is the destination of most commuter passengers, and Station 128 is also a transfer station, so there are both commuters and transfer passengers getting of at this station.Stations 121, 122, 123, and 134 are located in the suburbs, and the nearby areas are mostly residential land, so the number of passengers getting on is much higher than the number of passengers getting of.(2) Passenger collector-distributor volume in diferent directions: To further analyze the distribution of passengers getting on and getting of, the number of passengers in the upward and downward directions are counted separately, as shown in Figure 7.
As can be seen from Figure 7, in the upward direction, a large number of passengers get on the train at Stations 121, 122, 123, and 124, while few passengers get of.Te situation is just the opposite at Stations 127, 132, and 133.Many passengers are getting on and of at Station 128, and there are almost no passengers getting on at stations south of Station 128.In the downward direction, a large number of passengers get on at Stations 132, 133, and 134, and a large number of passengers get of at Station 127.Similarly, a large Te most signifcant diference between the downward direction and the upward direction is that in the upward direction, there are still a large number of passengers getting of at stations south of Station 128, but in the downward direction, passengers are getting of at stations north of Station 128(except Station 127); there are very few passengers getting of at each station.Tis is because the station around the southern end of the metro line has both residential and ofce land, while the site around the northern end of the line is mostly residential land, and there are few ofce buildings.

Distance Distribution of Passenger Flow.
Te average station distance of Changchun Rail Transit Line 1 is about 1.2 km, the average passenger distance is 5.64 km, the average passenger distance of upward is 5.88 km, and the average passenger distance of downward is 5.56 km.Te proportion of long-haul passengers is shown in Table 7.
All the above passenger fow indicators are given in Table 8.
Obviously, the passenger fow volume of each station of Changchun Rail Transit Line 1 is unbalanced, and there are more long-haul passengers; it is suitable for running express and local trains.

Optimization Results and Analysis
. SPSS was used to perform cluster analysis on the standardized passenger fow data, residence index, and ofce index, and the cluster lineage diagram of the site was obtained, as shown in Figure 8.
According to the pedigree chart, the station can be divided into three categories and fve subcategories, as given in Table 9.
Te frst type (Stations 122 and 123): these two stations have the highest residence index and the lowest ofce index among all the stations, indicating that the land around these sites is mostly residential land, and the passenger fow is relatively large.It can be inferred that the passenger fow of these sites during the morning peak period is mostly residents living around the site, so the stop is necessary at these two stations.
Te second type: the second type of site has a low passenger fow, and the residence index and ofce index are in the middle level.Class 2.1 has Stations 124, 132, and 133, and the passenger fow of these stations is relatively large, and the ofce index is greater than the residence index, so there will be some passengers with the origin station (such as Stations 122 and 123) to the destination of Class 2.1 stations, and Stations 124 and 132 are transfer stations.So, this kind of station must be stopping stations.Te common feature of Class 2.2 stations is that the passenger fow is small, so there is no need for the express train to stop.Te residence index and ofce index around category stations (Stations 125 and 131) are high, but the passenger fow rate is small; the reason is that these areas are still in the development stage, so in the current train operation plan, such stations are designated as overtaking stations.Te passenger fow of Class 2.2.2 is small, and the residence index and ofce index are not high, so the express train does not have to stop.It is worth mentioning that the distance between Stations 125 and 124 is only 500 m, and consecutive stops in short distance greatly afect the efciency of subway operation, and Line 1 and Line 3 cannot realize intrastation transfer at Station 125, resulting in a small number of passengers at the station, so before realizing intrastation transfer between Line 1 and Line 3, it makes little sense for trains to stop at the station.
Te third type (Station 127): Station 127 is divided into a separate category because the passenger fow in Station 127 is the largest; the ofce index is the highest among all stations, and the residence index is low, indicating that most of    Journal of Advanced Transportation the land around such stations is ofce land.Tere is a large commuter fow, and there is a certain number of other types of passenger fow, so such stations must be stopping stations.
Based on the analysis of the passenger fow and clustering results, the potential stop stations and preliminary stopping plan are determined as follows: running express trains in the upward direction and running local trains in the downward direction.To sum up, the stopping scheme of fast and slow trains is determined as shown in Figure 9.
In the NSGA-II algorithm, the population size is 100, crossover probability � 0.8, mutation probability � 0.1, and the maximum number of iterations is 300.Te model parameter values are given in Table 10.Te schematic diagram of the Pareto solution set is shown in Figure 10.Four representative solutions selected from the Pareto solution set for comparison from the point of view of total travel time and operating costs, as shown in Table 11.0 represents running slow train only, and the value in parentheses is the objective function value under the single data source: OD matrix.Te timetable is given in Table 12, and the stopping scheme and the train diagram are shown in Figures 11  and 12.
Te optimization results are analyzed as follows: (1) Pareto solution 1. Tis scheme has the lowest number of stops, the lowest operating cost of the enterprise, and the highest total travel time of passengers, indicating that among the four schemes, this scheme has the lowest level of passenger service.If decision-makers give more importance to saving the operating cost of the enterprise, this scheme would be chosen.
(2) Pareto solution 2. In this scheme, the total travel time of passengers is the least, indicating that this scheme        is more conducive to improving service quality of passengers.However, due to the large number of stops of express trains and the high operating cost of enterprises, this scheme would be chosen when decision-makers give more importance to the travel experience of passengers.(3) Pareto solution 3. Compared with solutions 1 and 2, the scheme with the highest degree of overlap between the previous stopping sequence and the potential stopping scheme has a total passenger travel time greater than solution 2 and less than solution 1, and its operating cost is also between the two.Terefore, when decision-makers give more importance to the passenger service level, enterprise cost, and passenger travel experience, this scheme is more appropriate.(4) Pareto solution 4. Similar to the solution 3 stopping scheme, this scheme is more appropriate when decision-makers value both passenger service level and enterprise cost, but value enterprise cost more.

Conclusion
In this paper, based on the multisource data of rail transit, we propose to optimize the design of the train stopping scheme and solve it by the NAGA-II algorithm, which improves the Tis paper studies the parking scheme of fast and local trains in peak hours, assuming that the passenger fow obeys uniform distribution, and the peak coefcient of the passenger fow can be considered in further research.Besides, the integration of connected bus lines and passenger fow data as well as update frequency of data source can also be considered.

P1:
Te origin and destination are both express stations A, and both the express stations are adjacent.P2: Te origin and destination are both express stations A, and both the express stations are not adjacent.P3: Passengers start at express station A and arrive at local station B. P4: Te pickup station is local station B, and the dropof station is express station A. P5: Passengers start and arrive at local station B.

( 2 )
Passengers between local stations choose local trains directly.(3) Te arrival of passengers is evenly distributed, and there are no stranded passengers at the station.(4) Te pairs of trains remain unchanged, and the formation of express and local trains is the same.3.3.1.Objective 1. Minimum total passenger travel time cost Total passenger travel time cost is the product of unit time value and passenger travel time min C T � C 0 • T.(

4. 1 .
Background.Te total length of Changchun Metro Line 1 is 18.1 km, with 15 stations numbered 121 to 135.Stations 121 and 128 are transfer stations; Station 121 can transfer to Line 8, Station 128 can transfer to Line 2, Station 132 can transfer to Line 3, and there are external transportation hubs nearby: Changchun Expressway passenger station.Station 125 can transfer to Line 3, and Station 124 can transfer to Line 4 (transfer outside the station); the two stations are very close to each other and are connected to a large external transportation hub: Changchun Station.Te specifc geographical location of the route is shown in Figure 2.

Figure 6 :
Figure 6: Morning peak passenger fow at each station.
accuracy and real-time performance of the stopping scheme based on the existing research in this area.Te model results are analyzed and compared from two aspects: passenger travel time and enterprise cost.A Pareto solution set is obtained for the best number of fast and slow trains and stopping schemes.(1) Potential stop stations are determined based on land use nature, and the spatial weight function is introduced to obtain the land use index refecting the characteristics of passenger fow.Te stop plan could be adjusted according to land use planning and land development mode along the metro line in the future.(2) Te proposed model and algorithm can provide efective ideas for the preparation of rail transit train operation plans and guide passengers to travel reasonably; it has certain practical signifcance for the rail transit research.

Table 2 :
Passenger fow OD matrix in peak hours.

Table 3 :
POI data and real estate website data.After fusion, the residence index and ofce index of each station are output.Te Gaussian kernel function is used to calculate the indices of various types of land use around the site.Te residence index ω ilive of site i is given as follows:

Table 6 :
Notation for decision variables.

Table 7 :
Te proportion of long-haul passengers.

Table 11 :
Pareto solution set comparison table.