Dragon Fruit Foliage Plant-Based Coagulant for Treatment of Concentrated Latex Effluent: Comparison of Treatment with Ferric Sulfate

e effectiveness of dragon fruit foliage as a natural coagulant for treatment of concentrated latex effluent was investigated and compared with ferric sulfate, a chemical coagulant. Dragon fruit is a round and oen red-colored fruit with scales-like texture and is native to south American countries which is also cultivated and heavilymarketed in southeast Asian countries. Its foliage represents a part of its overall plant system. Latex effluent is one of the main byproduct from rubber processing factories in Malaysia. ree main parameters investigated were chemical oxygen demand (COD), suspended solids (SS), and turbidity of effluent. Coagulation experiments using jar test were performed with a �occulation system where the effects of latex effluent pH as well as coagulation dosage on coagulation effectiveness were examined. e highest recorded COD, SS, and turbidity removal percentages for foliage were observed for effluent pH 10 at 94.7, 88.9, and 99.7%, respectively. It is concluded that the foliage showed tremendous potential as a natural coagulant for water treatment purposes. e foliage could be used in the pretreatment stage of Malaysian latex effluent prior to secondary treatment.


Introduction
e Malaysian natural rubber industry has become among the most important agriculture-based industries in this country.Currently, Malaysia is the third largest natural rubber (NR) producer in the world [1] with total productions of natural rubber in 2011 of 996,210 tonnes for both dry and latex amounted to almost RM 13,278 million [2].Malaysia rubber industry's contribution to national exports from natural rubber, rubber products, hevea wood products, and other rubber in 2011 amounted RM40.42 billion equivalent to 5.82% of Malaysia's export [3].Meanwhile, world rubber production and consumption in 2011 were 26,089,000 tonnes and 25,850,000 tonnes, respectively [4].However, the effluents generated from this industry create a major impact on the natural environment.It is estimated that in average, 20 tonnes of rubber and 410 thousand litres of effluent per day are produced by rubber factory and some reported 80 million litres of untreated rubber effluent are discharged daily into streams and rivers from the rubber processing factories in Malaysia [1,[5][6][7].Untreated latex concentrate effluent comprises a large quantity of water for washing and cleaning of raw materials, small amount of uncoagulated latex, and serum (protein, carbohydrate, lipid, carotenoids, and salt) [1].Highly contaminated with serum contributed to high BOD (Table 1), therefore this effluent when discharged into water course will deplete dissolved oxygen present in the water and eventually affect aquatic life.
Biological treatments such as pond technology and aerobic and anaerobic methods are the most commonly used treatment systems.However, these treatment systems come with large area requirement, high maintenance, long retention time, and high emission hydrogen sul�de (H 2 S) which causes malodour problems associated with treatment T 1: e characteristics of concentrated latex effluent [1,[5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] and regulatory discharge standard limits [14].

Parameters
Concentrated latex effluent (mg/L) Regulatory standard discharge limit (mg/L) of concentrated latex effluent using pond systems [1].It is of high time to identify the best coagulant for coagulation processes in order to ensure the �nal discharge is well-treated.
Coagulation is an important process in the treatment of both surface water and industrial wastewater.Its application includes removal of dissolved chemical species and turbidity via addition of chemical-based coagulants such as alum (AlCl 3 ), ferric chloride (FeCl 3 ), and polyaluminium chloride (PAC).While the effectiveness of these chemicals as coagulants are well-established [15,16], there are, nonetheless, disadvantages associated with the usage of these coagulants such as relatively high procurement costs as well as detrimental effects on human health and environment.It is therefore desirable that these chemical coagulants are replaced with cost-effective natural coagulants to counteract the aforementioned disadvantages.
To date, a variety of natural substances such as bone shell extracts, bark resins, and natural mineral soils have been examined for their coagulation properties [17].Research on natural coagulants from plant-based material has been focused on Moringa oleifera [18][19][20][21] for the past two decades but more researchers are studying application of other natural plant coagulants such as cactus Latifaria and Opuntia.It is reported that cactus Latifaria has the potential for use as a natural water treatment coagulant [22] while cactus Opuntia exhibits high turbidity removal efficiency for sewage and seawater treatment [23].Opuntia spp.operates predominantly through a bridging coagulation mechanism and represents a part of point-of-use water treatment technology for producing portable water in developing communities [24].A recent study indicates that Opuntia �cus�in�ica grows in arid and semiarid regions of Mexico and other countries produces "mucilage" that contains polygalacturonic acid (biopolymer) with interesting coagulating-�occulating capabilities with 65% of the initial COD being removed at pH 10 (dose of 50 mg/L) [25].
According to Pichler et al. [26], mucilage derived from the species Opuntia �cusin�ica demonstrated high efficiency of the cactus to eliminate turbidity compared to aluminium sulfate (Al 2 (SO 4 ) 3 ).e mucilage extract increased particulatesettling rates 330% compared with aluminium sulfate, at dosage concentration of 3 mg/L, while its performance was equivalent at doses 0.3% of the required Al 2 (SO 4 ) 3 concentration.Hence, the positive outcome of studies on cactus-based wastewater coagulation justi�es further research on other natural coagulants.
Coming from the family Cactaceae, dragon fruit of Hylocereus genus or also known as pitaya is a round, juicy, and highly nutritious fruit.It is oen red-colored with scaleslike texture and is native to Mexico, central and south America [27].It is also cultivated and heavily marketed in southeast Asian countries where the fruit is highly favorable.It is well established as a new crop in Australia, China, Israel, Malaysia, Nicaragua, Taiwan, and Vietnam [28].e commercial production of dragon fruit in Israel, Malaysia, and Taiwan produces 16000-27000 kg/ha [29].e foliage of the plant represents a part of its overall system.It can be found abundantly but of no particular usage.In commercial production of the fruits, proper foliage thinning is important in achieving a good fruit size and yield [30].
We hypothesized that dragon fruit foliage can also be used for a similar purpose as cactus Latifaria and Opuntia.In our opinion, usage of natural coagulant directly contributes to the global sustainable technology initiatives since the dragon fruit plant is relatively abundant, innocuous, and biodegradable.On the basis of the above discussion, the main objective of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of dragon fruit foliage as a natural coagulant for treatment of concentrated latex effluent.Latex effluent is one of the main byproducts from rubber processing factories in Malaysia which comprises mainly of carbonaceous organic materials, nitrogen, and sulfate [31].e three main parameters investigated were chemical oxygen demand (COD), suspended solids (SS), and turbidity of effluent.e coagulation effectiveness of the foliage is compared with ferric sulfate, a chemical coagulant.

Experimental
Samples of concentrated latex effluent were obtained from MARDEX Industrial Latex in Perak, Malaysia.e effluent was collected from the process line prior to chemical �occulation and sedimentation unit operations within the plant.e samples' collection and storing were based on standard method for the examination of water and wastewater [32].pH value and temperature of latex effluent were determined using a portable pH meter (HACH model).Raw concentrated latex effluent is a white-colored suspension at average pH of 7.3 and mainly consists of water.

Preparation of Dragon Fruit
Foliage.Dragon fruit foliage was collected from Tanjung Malim smallholder in Perak, Malaysia.Its thorns were removed and the foliage was subsequently washed, cut, and dried at 80 ∘ C. It was blended into �ne powder and sieved to a particle size range of 0.45-1.25 mm.

Preparation of Ferric Sulfate.
Ferric sulfate was purchased from chemical company in Subang, Malaysia, in powder form with approximately 97% purity.Ferric sulfate solution was prepared by 51.5 g ferric sulfate dissolved in 1000 mL, 5% (v/v) distilled water solution.e solution was well stirred for jas test analysis.

Coagulation Jar Test Experiments.
Coagulation experiments using jar test were performed in laboratory with a Bioblock �occulation that comprises six-paddle rotor (24.5 mm × 63.5 mm) for 500 mL high shaped beakers which is in accordance to standards [32] and all tests were conducted at room temperature.e Jar test coagulation experiment using dragon fruit foliage and ferric sulfate was conducted separately.500 mL of latex concentrate effluent was poured into each of the 6 beakers.e desired amount of coagulant was added to the suspension and stirred at rapid mixing (120 rpm) for 1 minute.e mixing time and speed were recorded.e speed of stirrer was reduced to slow mixing (30 rpm) for 20 minutes to keep �ocs particles uniformly suspended.e paddles were then withdrawn and settling of �ocs particles was observed and recorded.e mixture was le for 1 hour and then the supernatant was collected to be used in the determination of the COD, SS, and turbidity using the standard method.e effect of pH was studied in the range of 2-11 and the effect of dosage was studied in the range from 200 mg/L to 800 mg/L.All analyses were done in triplicates and pH of wastewater samples was controlled by adding 1.0 M H 2 SO 4 or 1.0 M NaOH.

Analytical Analysis.
Turbidity test was performed using HACH Model 2100P portable turbidimeter with measurement in nephelometric turbidity unit (NTU).is turbidimeter can measure turbidity from 0.001 to 1000 NTU in automatic range mode with automatic decimal point.e measurement is based on the light-transmitting properties of water.Suspended solid was carried out with the aid of vacuum �ltration apparatus.e initial weight of �lter paper was recorded aer drying in the oven at 100 ∘ C-105 ∘ C for 1 hour.A 10 mL of the water sample was �ltered through a glass �bre �lter.e residue was dried to constant weight at 100 ∘ C-105 ∘ C for 1 hour.e �lter paper was then cooled in dessicator before weighing.e total suspended solid content was calculated by using equation below: where  is weight of disk + remaining solids (g),  is weight of empty disk (g), and  is volume of sample (mL).e COD test was performed according to HACH reactor digestion procedure, colorimetric determination method 8000 using DR 2000 HACH spectrophotometer with the COD range from 200 to 15,000 mg/L.Since the COD value of latex concentrated effluent was more than 1000 mg/L, high range (HR) COD digestion reagent was used with the concentrated latex effluent sample.Two COD digestion reagents were used for both the sample and the blank test.e COD reactor was �rst preheated at 150 ∘ C followed by placing 2 mL of wastewater sample into the vials using volumetric pipettes and deionized water was used to replaced wastewater sample for blank test.e mixtures were mixed and then placed in the preheated COD reactor for 2 hours.e reactor was then turned off and le idle for about 20 minutes prior to cooling to 120 ∘ C or less.Colorimetric determination was then read at 435 COD HR modes.
e BOD experiment was carried out using respirometric method (HACH method 10099).It was measured at 20 ∘ C under 5-day incubation.e 20 ∘ C wastewater sample of a known range and volume was poured into a BOD track sample bottle.BOD nutrient buffer pillow was added for optimum bacteria growth.Lithium hydroxide powder pillow was also added and stirred.e bottle was placed at the BOD track apparatus inside the incubator at temperature of 20 ∘ C. e BOD results were taken aer 5-day incubation.
e value of sulfate was performed using DR 2400 spectrophotometer.10 mL of treated wastewater was added into the sample cell while deionized water was used for reference.Sulfate Ver 4 reagent powder pillow was also added, stirred, and then le for 5 minutes for reaction to take place.
e value of ammonia-nitrogen was determined using DR 2400 spectrophotometer.0.1 mL of treated wastewater was added into ammonia-nitrogen reagent while deionized water was used for reference.Ammonia salicylate reagent powder pillow and ammonia cyanurate reagent powder pillow were added into each vial and mixed thoroughly.Both vials were le for 20 minutes for the reaction to take place.
Carbon (C), Hydrogen (H), and Nitrogen (N) contents in dragon fruit foliage were determined using the CHNS/O Analyzer (LECO CHNS932, USA).Approximately 2000 mg of very �ne cut of oven dried dragon fruit foliage were placed in a tin capsule and crimped.ree types of crimped capsules were analyzed; placed in the auto sampler for the CHNS/O analyzer Sulfamethazine, and dragon fruit foliage sample and blank as standard.e temperature of the analyzer oxidation was set at 1000 ∘ C. A program run the analysis automatically and the results were given in percentage.
Malvern Zetasizer 3000 was used to measure zeta potential of dragon fruit foliage coagulant.Experiments were performed at coagulant dosage of 0.01 mol/L as Fe and pH of the coagulant solutions was adjusted by adding HCL (1 mol/L) or NaOH (1 mol/L).Aer 5 minutes of gentle stirring, the samples were analyzed and the data were recorded.

Characteristics of Raw Concentrated Latex Effluent.
Table 2 shows the characteristics of concentrated latex effluent before the coagulation pretreatment.e values were within the range based on previous result [1,[5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]  pH and SS.is was due to the large amount of water used in factory operation and this can be shown by the pH at average of 7.3 during sampling.It is obvious that treatment of the effluent is required before it can be discharged into the environment since the COD concentration alone is more than 70 times higher than discharge limit.Further analysis indicated that the BOD/COD ratio is approximately 0.17 implying low biodegradability and difficulty for natural attenuation in the environment.

Characterization of Dragon Fruit
Foliage.Elemental analysis (Table 3) was conducted to provide a comparison between the elemental compositions of the foliage and that of other natural coagulants, Moringa oleifera, and cactus Opuntia.In this study, it was determined that the foliage contained 43.1% C, 3.8% N, and 2.9% H.
To investigate the reason of high efficiency and the latex concentrate treatment mechanism of dragon fruit foliage coagulant, the variation of zeta potential hydrolysis products as a function of pH was measured.In this series of experiments, the pH value was varied by addition of HCL or NaOH solution.It needs to be pointed out that the pH values in zeta experiments were the same as the pH of coagulant solution (0.5 g/L).In this study, the working solution was the distilled water.e data obtained were summarized in Figure 1.Zeta potential is a controlling parameter of charge neutralization of coagulant and can usually be used to interpret the trend of coagulation efficiency.e zeta potential of dragon fruit foliage coagulant decreased from 32.2 to 15.8 mV as the pH was increased from 4.5 to 7.5.e value of the zeta potential is practically constant in wide range of pH (from 4 to 8).e latex concentrate in water has a negative charge on its surface, so the higher the positive charge on the coagulant surface, the higher the latex concentrate removal efficiency.
A standard jar test is an important procedure to help select the most appropriate coagulant for a particular effluent treatment.It allows individual polymer to be evaluated based on criteria such as �oc formation, settling characteristics, and clarity of treated effluent.Figure 2 shows the �occules before and aer the coagulation process of concentrated latex effluent using light microscope.Denser and larger �occules clearly appeared aer the coagulation process using dragon fruit foliage.is is an early indication of the coagulative capability of the foliage.

Effect of Effluent pH on Coagulation
Effectiveness. pH of the solution during coagulation affects the chemistry of the coagulant.For example, ferric salts undergo rapid, uncontrolled hydrolysis reactions upon their addition to water, forming a series of chemical products or complexes [33].erefore, it is important to determine the in�uence of controlled latex effluent pH on coagulation effectiveness.Figure 3 shows the effect of latex effluent pH on coagulation effectiveness at coagulant dosage of 500 mg/L.Generally, the COD, SS, and turbidity removal percentages for ferric sulfate are higher than foliage at corresponding effluent pH.e highest recorded COD, SS, and turbidity removal percentages for foliage were observed for effluent pH 10 at 94.7, 88.9, and 99.7%, respectively.Ferric sulfate exhibits consistent COD, SS, and turbidity removal within the pH range of 3-10 in which percentage COD removal exceeded 90%.
e curve for foliage is rather different compared to ferric sulfate in which there were two discernible "peak" values at pH 3 and 10 for the former.Nonetheless, it can be argued that these two "peak" values also existed for the ferric sulfate COD curve albeit, they were not as apparent as the foliage curve.A similar observation is seen from the �ndings by Zhang et al. [23] where the lowest turbidity removal percentages recorded using cactus Opuntia are at pH 6 and 7 while the optimum pH is 10.It is interesting to note that this two "peak" pH phenomenon is not exclusive to this study (or natural coagulant) but also observed in other coagulation studies as well.Findings from Aziz et al. [34] on color removal from land�ll leachate using ferric sulfate indicate a similar trend in which the two "peak" pH values are 4 and 12 with lower colour removal percentages at pH 6 and 7.In their �ndings, these two "peak" pH values are far more discernible compared to our ferric sulfate study most probably due to chemicals present in latex effluent which are more amenable to the formation of �ocs and not so much so for chemicals in land�ll leachate.�e suggest that the relatively lower removal percentages at effluent pH around 7 for foliage as well as observed in the aforesaid studies are caused by solution neutrality as opposed to acidic and basic pH where the elevated concentration of either H + or OH − causes more electrostatic interactions between the coagulant and chemical species in the effluent and thus promotes coagulation.

Effect of Coagulant Dosage on Coagulation Effectiveness.
Figure 4 shows the effect of coagulant dosage on coagulation effectiveness at optimum pH values of 10 and 7 for foliage and ferric sulphate, respectively.ese pH values were selected based on our previous �ndings in this study.For ferric sulfate dosage range of 250-750 mg/L, COD and turbidity removal percentages showed marginal difference in which more than 98% removal was achieved.Similarly, foliage dosage range of 200-800 mg/L showed consistent removal of COD and turbidity (>95%).It appeared that SS removal percentages were consistently lower than that of COD and turbidity for both coagulants.It was rather obvious that both coagulants showed high removal percentages (>88%) for all the investigated parameters even though it could be argued that the foliage showed marginally lower COD removal percentages (>95%) compared to ferric sulfate (>99%).e use of natural coagulants may increase the organic load in waters [37] resulting in the possibility for undesired and increased microbial activity [24].As such, this factor may be partly responsible for the foliage not achieving COD removal percentage as high as exhibited by ferric sulfate.is is because increased microbial activity increases BOD concentration and subsequently contributes to increased COD concentration in an aqueous solution.

Comparison with Malaysian Standard Effluent Discharge
Limit.A crucial aspect of industrial wastewater treatment is to reduce contaminants concentrations of point-source effluent discharge to within regulatory permissible limits.As such, it is of interest to evaluate the extend of effectiveness of foliage in reducing the COD and SS concentrations of the latex effluent with respect to regulatory effluent discharge limit, so that suitability of the foliage as a pretreatment or allinclusive coagulant can be determined.Figure 5 analyzes the compliance of COD and SS concentrations of treated latex effluent (at optimum pH) with standard effluent discharge limits A and B stipulated by the DOE, Malaysia.Ferric sulfate is capable of reducing both the COD and SS concentrations to lower than Standard A limit (50 mg/L) at a dosage range of 300-500 mg/L.is indicates that the ferric sulfate can be used as an all-inclusive coagulant for treating Malaysia latex effluent produced by a rubber processing plant located downstream of a water supply intake point, though this aspect is greatly dependent on the initial COD concentration of the effluent (which should be lower than 7800 mg/L to be applicable).
For foliage, SS concentrations of treated effluent �uctuated around Standard B limit (100 mg/L) while its corresponding COD concentrations were clearly higher than Standard A and B for all dosages.Nonetheless, it is erroneous to construe from this observation that the foliage is an ineffective or unsuitable coagulant for latex effluent since the foliage is capable of removing more than 88% of COD concentrations as proven in previous sections.erefore, by considering the two aspects of removal percentages as well as regulatory compliance, it can be surmised that the foliage can be used in the pretreatment stage of Malaysian latex effluent prior to secondary treatment.From this study, it can be implied that dragon fruit foliage shows tremendous potential as natural coagulant for water treatment purposes.COD removal percentages of more than 88% are rather impressive as the latex effluent contains an amalgamation of organic and inorganic substrates which normally complicate coagulation treatment.We suggest that the foliage may even exhibit higher contaminant removal percentages for less complex or solute concentrated waters such as surface water (rivers and lakes).

Conclusion
Generally, the COD, SS, and turbidity removal percentages for ferric sulfate were higher than foliage at corresponding effluent pH.However, this was not a true indication of the relative coagulative effectiveness of the foliage.e lower removal percentages for foliage were probably due to increased organic load from biological components of foliage and subsequently contributed to increased BOD and COD concentrations in the solution media.e highest recorded COD, SS, and turbidity removal percentages for foliage were observed for effluent pH 10 at 94.7, 88.9, and 99.7%, respectively, which were rather impressive considering the complex chemical nature of the latex effluent.As such, it could be concluded that the foliage showed tremendous potential as natural coagulant for water treatment purposes.For this study, since the foliage showed high COD removal percentages and yet could not reduce the COD concentrations to less than Standard B limit, it is suggested that it could be used in the pretreatment stage of Malaysian latex effluent prior to secondary treatment.For future study, it is recommended that the dragon fruit foliage be used for other wastewater treatments.
for pH are expressed in mg/L.

F 1 :
Variations of the zeta potential with respect to pH for dragon fruit foliage coagulant.

T 3 :F 2 :F 3 :
Elemental analysis of dragon fruit foliage and comparison with other natural coagulants.ParametersShelled Moringa seeds[35] Nonshelled Moringa seeds[35] Cactus Opuntia[36] Floccules (a) before and (b) aer the coagulation process of concentrated latex effluent.Effect of latex effluent pH on coagulation effectiveness at coagulant dosage 500 mg/L.

F 4 :
Effect of coagulant dosage on coagulation effectiveness at optimum effluent pH.

F 5 :
Comparison analysis of COD and SS concentrations of treated latex effluent (at optimum pH of 10 for foliage and 7 for ferric sulfate) with standard effluent discharge limits A and B stipulated by the Department of the Environment, Malaysia[14].Initial COD and SS concentrations were 7857 and 1208, respectively.
except for T 2: Values of selected parameters of raw concentrated latex effluent.