Synthesis , Characterization , and Thermokinetic Analysis of New Epoxy Sugar Derivative

The synthesis of 5,6-O-isopropylidene-1,2-O-(R)-trichloroethylidene-α-D-glucofuranose (compound 1) and 5,6-O-isopropylidene1,2-O-(R)-trichloroethylidene-3-O-(2,3-epoxypropan-1-yl)-α-D-glucofuranose (compound 2) was carried out. The synthesized compounds 1 and 2were characterized by nuclearmagnetic resonance (H-NMR), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and thermogravimetric analysis (TG).The FTIR and HNMR spectra showed that the epoxy group in compound 2was attached by means of a nucleophilic substitution reaction.The activation energies for thermal degradation of compounds 1 and 2were calculated from their TG data by using the Kissinger-Akahira-Sunose (KAS) and Tang methods.


Introduction
Epoxides are versatile intermediates in organic synthesis.Not only are these compounds easily prepared from a variety of starting materials, but also the inherent polarity and strain of their three-membered ring make them susceptible to reaction with a large number of reagents: electrophiles, nucleophiles, acids, bases, reducing agents, and some oxidizing agents [1].
Chiral oxiranes are very important building blocks for the synthesis of enantiomerically pure complex molecules of biologically active compounds [1][2][3].Carbohydrates contain several functional groups and stereogenic centres in one molecular unit, which allows the use of carbohydrates as tools in stereochemical differentiations, as starting materials in exchiral pool syntheses of interesting enantiopure compounds [4], as chiral templates in asymmetric transformations [5], and as chiral auxiliaries in stereoselective synthesis [6,7].
Oxiranes are key intermediates in the asymmetric synthesis of chiral 1,2-difunctionalized compounds of biological and pharmacological interest, such as -hydroxy--amino acids derived from isoserine, which are important members of the -amino acid family.Isoserine derivatives constitute an essential fragment in natural products of high therapeutic value [3], such as Taxol (an anticancer agent), whose side chain is N-acyl-(2R,3S)-phenylisoserine; bestatin (a dipeptide modifier of the immune response), in which one of the amino acids is (2S,3R)-2-hydroxy-3-amino-3-phenylbutyric acid, and the kinostatins (potent inhibitors of the HIV-1 protease), in which one of the constituent amino acids is (2S,3S)-2-hydroxy-3-amino-3-phenylbutyric acid.
The aim of this study was to investigate the possibility of producing sugar compound (2) which might be used as a monomer for the synthesis of certain polymers.Glucose is an abundant and sustainable natural product.The chloralose derivative of glucose is also prepared easily with choral and acid catalysts such as H 2 SO 4 [8].It is not possible to make an epoxy derivative of -chloralose without using the protecting group (5,6-O-isopropylidene). 1,2-O-(R)-Trichloroethylidene--D-glucofuranose was further acetalized with 2,2-dimethoxypropane (2,2-DMP) to give the 5,6-O-isopropylidene derivative (compound 1) [9].This sugar derivative has only one free hydroxyl group which can be etherified.After inserting a leaving group, it can also be used in a substitution reaction.Etherification of the C-3 hydroxyl group is not easy because of the low reactivity, due to steric effects of the protecting groups.Reaction with epichlorohydrin was carried out with 5,6-O-isopropyliden-1,2-O-(R)-trichloroethylidene--D-glucofuranose (1)Figure 5.This derivative was used as a starting material which has a free C-3 hydroxyl group to react with epichlorohydrin at room temperature under basic conditions.Tetrabutylammonium bromide was used as a phase-transfer catalyst in this reaction.The structures and the stereochemistry of all of the compounds (1 and 2) were determined using spectroscopic techniques.[10][11][12].Thermogravimetric analysis can be used for determining the degradation kinetics of a lot of compounds.In general, the thermal degradation reaction of a solid compound can be shown as

Kinetic Analysis
where A is the starting material and B solid and C gas are the solid residue and the gaseous products, respectively.The thermal degradation kinetics of the compounds is generally expressed by the following typical kinetic equation: where  is the absolute temperature (K);  is the conversion per unit time (); and () is the conversion function which represents the reaction model.The degree of conversion () is calculated by (3), where   ,   , and   are the weights of sample before degradation at time  and after complete degradation, respectively: is the reaction constant which can be expressed by the Arrhenius equation: where  is called the preexponential factor,  is the activation energy, and  is the gas constant.By combining ( 2) and ( 4), the following equation is obtained: According to the kinetic theory for the nonisothermal decomposition reactions, the fractional conversion  is expressed as a function of temperature which depends on the time of heating.Thus, the heating rate () can be described as As a result, ( 5) can be modified as follows: Equations ( 5) and ( 7) are the basis for the many equations derived to evaluate thermal analysis data.
1.2.Kissinger-Akahira-Sunose (KAS) Method [13,14].The KAS method is based on the following equation: where the plots of ln(/ 2 ) versus 1000/ for the several  values give straight lines with the slope of −/ which give the corresponding  values.[15].The Tang method is based on the following equation:

Tang Method
Here, the plot of ln(/ 1.894661 ) versus 1000/ can give  from the slope.

Results and Discussion
The FTIR spectra of compounds 1 and 2 are shown in Figure 1.
The peak assignments in the FTIR spectrum of compound 1 are as follows: C-H in CH 3 and C-H in CH 2 at 2800-3000 cm −1 ; C(CH 3 ) 3 in isopropylidene protective group at 1374 cm −1 ; C-O-C peak in the sugar ring at 1150 cm −1 ; and C-Cl peaks of trichloroethylidene protective group at 827 and 811 cm −1 .Finally, the absorption band at 3473 cm −1 corresponds to the presence of the C-3 OH group.
The FTIR spectrum of compound 2 was as follows: C-H in CH 3 and C-H in CH 2 at 2800-3000 cm −1 ; C(CH 3 ) 3 in isopropylidene protective group at 1372 cm −1 ; C-O-C peak in the sugar ring at 1100 cm −1 ; and C-Cl peaks of trichloroethylidene protective group at 832 and 812 cm −1 .Instead of the hydroxyl peak observed in the FTIR spectrum of compound 1, an ether (C-O-C) peak at 1068 cm −1 is observed in the FTIR spectrum of compound 2.
In the 1 H NMR spectra of compound 2, the anomeric H-1 proton usually appears at a low field and is a very characteristic and distinct signal.Two doublets are observed in this 1 H NMR spectrum.One is the H-1 doublet at  6.05 and another is the H-2 doublet at  4.74.The coupling constant between H-1 and H-2 is 4.0 Hz which is typical for an -D-furanose derivative.Due to the twisted conformation of the furanose rings, the dihedral angle between the H-2 and H-3 protons is usually 90 ∘ and, hence, in the spectra of compound 2, the coupling constant between H-2 and H-3 is 0 Hz.The H-5 proton gives a complex multiplet at  4.65.One of the epoxy group signals is H-1  which is resolved into a double doublet (dd) at  3.92 with a coupling constant between H-1  and H-2  of 6.4 Hz.H-2  signal is observed as a multiplet at  3.13.The H-3  signals are resolved giving a dd signal at  2.80 with a coupling constant between H-1  and H-2  of 11.6 Hz.The isopropylidene methyl groups resonate at  1.39 and 1.33.Finally, the trichloroethylidene acetal proton (HCCl 3 ) gives a signal at  5.28.

Thermogravimetric Analysis of the Compounds (1 and 2).
Figures 2(a) and 2(b) show the TG and DTG thermograms of compound 1 and compound 2 under nitrogen atmosphere over a temperature range from 30 to 600 ∘ C with a heating rate of 10 ∘ C min −1 , respectively.The derivative of the thermogram with respect to temperature, also known as a differential thermogram or a DTG, shows the maximum rate of compound decomposition ( max ).The initial (  ) and maximum ( max ) degradation temperatures related to the thermograms are summarized in Table 1.
As far as thermal degradation of compounds is concerned, only one degradation stage was observed.The  max of compound 1 was about 276 ∘ C while that of compound 2 was 248 ∘ C. Thus, these results show that the thermal stability of compound 1 was approximately 28 ∘ C higher than that of compound 2. Obviously, it is the epoxy unit, the critical component of the compound, which decreases the thermal stability.In order to obtain detailed information related to the thermal stability of the compounds, the activation energy of the degradation was calculated using the KAS and Tang methods.The KAS and Tang methods were used to analyze the TG data of the compounds because they were independent of any thermal degradation mechanism.

Thermal Degradation Kinetics of the Compounds (1 and 2)
. Compounds 1 and 2 were heated thermogravimetrically under various heating rates such as 5, 10, 15, and 20 ∘ C min −1 in a temperature range of 30 to 600 ∘ C to determine their thermal degradation activation energies.The TG curves obtained for compounds 1 and 2 are shown in Figures 3(a) and 3(b), respectively.The individual degradation behavior of each compound was analogous at all heating rates as seen from the figure.The activation energies for the compounds were estimated by the KAS and Tang methods.The average activation energies for compounds 1 and 2 were found to be 96 and 69 kJ mol −1 , respectively, by means of the KAS method.By comparison, the average activation energies when calculated by the Tang method for compounds 1 and 2 were 113 and 87 kJ mol −1 , respectively.The activation energies determined by the KAS and Tang methods indicate that the thermal stability of compound 1 has a significantly higher  value than that of compound 2. Thus, it is shown that the addition of the epoxy group to the structure decreases the thermal stability.The plot of  versus the degree of conversion is commonly used to indicate the degradation mechanism, that is, whether it is one-step or more.As shown in Figure 4(a) (using the KAS method), the mechanism was almost constant up to  = 0.8;  is deduced to be between 81 and 103 kJ mol −1 for compound 1 and between 75 and 65 kJ mol −1 for compound 2, which means that the compounds have only one degradation mechanism.The activation energies calculated through the Tang method for the compounds as a function of the degree of conversion (Figure 4(b)) also showed that the  values were almost constant up to 80% and then increased.Thus, it can be concluded that thethermal degradation mechanisms of compound 1 and compound 2 exhibit similar behavior.Secondly, the increase in the  values as a function of  may be attributed essentially to thermally more stable structures because of secondary reactions which had occurred during the progress of thermal degradation [16].

Instrumentation.
The structures of the synthesized compounds were determined by means of 1 H NMR (nuclear magnetic resonance) spectra of the compounds dissolved in deuterated chloroform using a Varian 400 MHz NMR Spectrometer.
The FTIR (Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy) spectra of the compounds were obtained using a Perkin Elmer 100 FT-IR Spectrometer and the KBr pellet technique.
The TG (thermogravimetric analysis) curves were recorded using Perkin Elmer, Diamond TG/DTA.The samples were heated under N 2 atmosphere over a temperature range of 30 to 600 ∘ C with a heating rate of 10 ∘ C min −1 .The weight loss (TG curve) and its first derivative according to the temperature (DTG curve) were recorded simultaneously.

5,6-O-Isopropylidene-1,2-O-(R)-trichloro-ethylidene-𝛼-Dglucofuranose (1).
A solution of 1,2-()-trichloroethylidene--D-glucofuranose (-chloralose) (5.0 g, 16.2 mmol), 2,2dimethoxypropane (4 mL, 32.4 mmol), and PTSA (5 mg) in DMF (50 mL) was stirred for 24 h at room temperature.The mixture was neutralized with a 5% solution of NaHCO 3 and the solution was removed.The syrupy residue was crystallized from methanol (4.72    (dd,   The thermal degradation of compounds 1 and 2 in nitrogen is a one-stage reaction according to thermogram.The thermal degradation kinetics of the compounds were evaluated using the KAS and Tang methods.The average activation energies calculated by the KAS method were found to be 96 kJ mol −1 for compound 1 and 69 kJ mol −1 for compound 2, respectively, while they were found to be 113 kJ mol −1 for compound 1 and 87 kJ mol −1 for compound 2 by the Tang method.Thus, it is concluded that thethermal degradation of compound 2 is found to be more favorable in comparison to that of compound 1.

Figure 4 :
Figure 4: (a) The plot of activation energy () versus the degree of conversion () for KAS method of compounds 1 and 2. (b) The plot of activation energy () versus the degree of conversion () for Tang method of compounds 1 and 2.

Table 1 :
Initial (  ) and maximum ( max ) degradation temperatures for the thermal degradation of the compounds.