Influence of Incorporating Silver Nanoparticles in Protease Treatment on Fiber Friction , Antistatic , and Antibacterial Properties of Wool Fibers

Donghua University Center for Civil Aviation Composites, Donghua University, 2999 North Renmin Road, Shanghai 201620, China Key Laboratory of Textile Science & Technology, Ministry of Education, College of Textiles, Donghua University, 2999 North Renmin Road, Shanghai 201620, China College of Textiles, Donghua University, 2999 North Renmin Road, Shanghai 2011620, China School of Textiles and Design, Heriot-Watt University, Galashiels TD1 3HF, UK College of Chemistry, Chemical Engineering, and Biotechnology, Donghua University, Shanghai 201620, China


Introduction
Despite many available synthetic fibers today, the natural fibers are still highly demanded and preferred to be used.Among other natural fibers, wool fiber is also being chosen by most of the consumers as one of the significant natural fibers.e livestock industry is not only established for meat and milk, but they also provide wool or hair fibers and thus affect positively the income of any country or state [1].Regardless of high market demand, wool fiber is unsuccessful for being used as topmost fiber due to its dearth [2].Pristine wool fiber comes with more or less major deficiencies, i.e., natural hydrophobicity of the outer surface due to the fatty acid layer, surface roughness due to its structure of cuticle, and a good media for the growth and propagation of bacteria under appropriate temperature and humidity.For the former two, several techniques have been applied to decompose the fatty surface layer [3][4][5] and/or coating or fabricating the hydrophilic materials over the layer of fatty acids on the surface wool fibers [6][7][8].However, such treatments often cause some losses in mechanical properties and/or compromise on its natural feel and comfort.
e natural hydrophobicity of wool fiber causes the static charge build-up on the fiber surface.Antistatic treatments of wool textiles lower the electrical resistivity and facilitate the charge dissipation on the fiber and thus diminish the high potential electrical discharges.Moreover, by lowering the surface resistivity of wool textile materials, better soil release, electroconducting, and electromagnetic and thermal shielding properties can be achieved, as well.Ki et al. [9] maintained that the antistatic efficacy of the finished wool fabrics with AgNPs on their surface increased marginally up to 50 ppm, then, it was found to be decreased on further adding of AgNPs.Recently, a novel way of producing antistatic wool textiles by in situ polypyrrole (PPy) synthesis and its treatments on the wool textile surface has been studied [10].Furthermore, Wang et al. [11] pretreated polyester fabrics then coated single-walled carbon nanotube (SWCNT) by coating-drying-curing under various plasma conditions and found that the appropriate conditions should be used to optimize the antistatic property of polyester fabrics.
Not only on the wool, but also on other textile media, some studies have been made to make the fiber antimicrobial.Dubas et al. [12] immobilized the antimicrobial silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) on nylon and silk fibers by following a sequential dipping in dilute solutions of AgNPs capped with poly (methacrylic acid) and poly (diallyl dimethyl ammonium chloride) by using the layer-by-layer deposition method.
ey maintained that 80% bacteria reduction for the silk fiber and 50% for the nylon fiber was achieved by the formation of a colored thin film.Khalil-Abad and Yazdanshenas [13] produced silver particles on cotton fibers by treatment with aqueous KOH and AgNO 3 , followed by surface hydrophobization.e modified cotton textiles were capable of killing both Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria on the textile surface.
Yu et al. [14] synthesized silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) by natural Dolcetto grape leaves and fabricated them with alginate fibers using the wet spinning method and confirmed the antibacterial properties of alginate fibers against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogenic bacteria.Xue et al. [15] produced AgNPs on cotton fibers by in situ reductions of [Ag(NH 3 ) 2 ] + with glucose, then the treated textiles were modified by alkylsilane with a long chain and claimed higher antibacterial activity against the Escherichia coli.Liu et al. [16] synthesized silver nanoparticles using solar irradiation and Nageia Nagi extract following the green chemistry and sustainable approach and assessed their antibacterial activity.Moreover, synthesis of AgNPs is being reported using variant natural leaves, for instance, bamboo [17], Chinese Holly [18], Gui Hua (Osmanthus Fragrans) [19], etc. e nanoparticles offer multifunctionalities to the textiles are being sustained after repeated washing [20][21][22].
e nanoparticles are being used for a large variety of applications; besides their plenty of benefits, there are some shortcomings and health issues related to nanoparticles, as reviewed and reported recently [23].However, silver has been reported as one of the safe antibacterial agents and nontoxic to the human body, which can kill harmful microorganisms [24].e aim of this paper is to present the characterization of antibacterial, mothproofing, and electrical properties of wool textiles by the application of nanosilver colloid.Here, we have analyzed the commercially available silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) for their antibacterial and antistatic performance mainly.e wool textiles were pretreated by an enzyme protease in order to make the wool fiber surface welcoming to silver nanoparticles.Wool fiber or fabric samples were placed at a standard temperature (i.e., 20 ± 2 °C) and humidity (i.e., 65 ± 2%) environment before all experiments for 24 hours to be moisture balanced.All the samples were kept in a dry bag.All fiber samples had a unit mass of 15 g. e fabric samples were cut according to the test requirements.Liquor ratio of 1 : 30 was used in the experiment.

Coating of H 2 O 2 /Protease with AgNPs.
e percentage of enzyme protease was varied (i.e., 3%, 6%, and 9%) in surface treatment before incorporating silver nanoparticles, and the pH value was varied at the silver incorporation stage; pH 4 and pH 7 were used.e experiment was conducted as illustrated in Figure 1.

Characterization of Nanocoatings.
e surface morphology of the fibers after treatment with protease and silver nanoparticles was determined by Scanning Electron Microscope (TM3000) with a magnification range of 20-30000X from Hitachi, Japan.e SEM micrographs taken at a magnification of 2000X are presented.
e woolen samples treated with protease and silver nanoparticles were tested using the infrared spectra using the Nicolet 6700 Fourier Transform Infrared Spectrometer by US ermo Fisher.e spectra were in the range of 4000 cm −1 to 400 cm −1 .e change of the functional groups in the fiber before and after the wool fibers treatment was analyzed by the changes of the peaks and valleys in the spectrum.

Characterization of Electrical
Properties.Fiber electricalspecific resistances of antistatic finish-treated fiber were determined by the fiber-specific resistance tester (XR-1A) from Changzhou Textile Instrument Ltd., China, with the resistance of 10 6 -10 13 Ω.
e average volume resistivity (Ω•cm) of a sample size of 15 g, 10 sets, was measured.e testing of the samples was performed at standard conditions of 20 ± 2 °C and 65 ± 3% relative humidity.
e fabric half-life and static voltage were measured by textile induction (fabric-induced) electrostatic tester (YG401) 10 kV 100000 s from Ningbo Textile Instrument Factory, China, according to the Chinese standards FZ/T01042-1996 "Determination of electrostatic half-life of electrostatic properties of textile materials."e test conditions used were temperature 20 °C and relative humidity, 30%-40%.

Characterization of Washing Fastness.
e washing fastness of silver nanocoated wool fibers was determined by following GB/T 3921.3-1997Textiles-tests for color fastness-color fastness to washing.Nanocoated wool fibers were washed at 60 °C in the washing liquor prepared by 2 g/L of Tween 20 (a nonionic detergent) for 5 min under mild stirring of the washing machine.
is was followed by rinsing wool fibers in cold water and then oven-dried at 80 °C.e nanocoated wool fibers were washed 20 times.e washing fastness of AgNPs on the nanocoated woolen fiber was evaluated by comparing the electrical properties AgNPs before and after washes.

Characterization of Antibacterial Property.
e antimicrobial performance of wool specimens was quantitatively evaluated against Gram-negative bacterium Klebsiella pneumoniae (K.pneumoniae; ATCC 4352) and Grampositive bacterium Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus; ATCC 6538) according to the test method AATCC 100-1999.Both K. pneumoniae and S aureus were subcultured on agar.e agar was prepared according to the method described in our previous paper [22].e wool specimens were placed on germ-containing agar plates, inoculated with S. aureus and K. pneumoniae.e wool samples were wetted with inoculum solution by using ∼0.5% of Tween 20, a commercial nonionic agent.Antibacterial performance of wool specimens was calculated after 24 hours of contact time in terms of percent reduction of bacteria (R%); mathematically, it can be expressed by the following equation: where R% is the percent reduction of bacteria, A is the number of bacterial colonies formed by untreated wool fiber, and B is the number of bacterial colonies formed by treated wool fiber.

Characterization of Fiber
Friction.e friction property of single fiber was tested by fiber friction coefficient tester (XCF-1A) with the precision of ±1 from Shanghai Institute, China.
e static friction coefficient and kinetic friction coefficient of each fiber were recorded at the standard testing conditions (i.e., 20 °C and 60% RH). e statistical data of the coefficient of kinetic friction were obtained and used in this study.

Effect on Surface Morphology of Wool Fibers.
e surface morphology and the effect of treatment on the wool fibers were observed using the scanning electron microscopy (SEM) at 2000X magnification (30 μm).e micrographs of the untreated samples are presented in Figure 2. From the micrographs, it can be observed that the untreated surface of the wool fibers is covered with tile-like arranged and intact scales.e edges of the scales are clearly visible.
Figure 2(a) shows the untreated fiber.Figures 2(b)-2(d) are wool treated with different percentages of protease incorporated with the same 8% o.w.f. of silver nanoparticles, all at pH 4. Figure 2(e) shows the wool fiber treated with 6% protease and 8% o.w.f.silver nanoparticles at pH 7.After the protease/treatment, it can be seen that the scale structures varied with the percentage of protease used, in which the scale protrusion and aggregation are decreased as protease used is decreased and they become less profound.e discontinuity of the scales is increased although the scales are not completely stripped but more profound on the fiber scale layers of the sample treated with 9% protease.Its scales are Journal of Chemistry degraded and fiber thinning is visible.It can be seen that it will form a layer of continuous hydrophilic film on the scale layer after coating antistatic agent, making the scale lines blurred and the whole body smooth, and only the local scales are not completely covered.e fibers treated at a higher pH (i.e., 7) reveal particles deposited onto the fiber surface, and the scales are further damaged.erefore, raising pH can affect the fiber surface properties.Moreover, it can also clearly be seen that the amount of silver absorbed at lower pH is higher.
Wool fiber at pH higher than isoelectric point has a negative surface charge.is charge would act as an initial restrictive agent to sorption of anionic species.At a lower pH, a significant proportion of internal amino groups are protonated, causing neutralization of this surface charge and absorption of the higher amount of AgNPs.It is also apparent that an increase in temperature leads to a higher load of silver on the fabrics due to the increase in kinetic energy.In alkaline conditions, silver ions seem to catalyze the degradation of cysteine, subsequently releasing H 2 S and thus forming additional thiol groups, which are later converted into mercaptides.

Analysis of Infrared Spectra of Wool Fibers after
Treatment.
e Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy technique was used to analyze the wool fiber before and after treatment, in order to investigate the changes in the fiber structure.e results are shown in Figure 3. e band frequencies of 1071 cm −1 and 1040 cm −1 were assigned for cysteic acid -SO 3 -and cysteine monoxide -SO − -, respectively, and the changes in their transmittances were observed.e eminence and the intensity of the SO 3 -vibrational bands at 1040 cm −1 were strong indications that the disulfide bonds S-S had been cleaved and subsequently oxidized to cysteic acid residues by hydrogen peroxide during the pretreatment process.It should also be noted that the increase in the percentage of protease (at same pH i.e., 4) causes further changes to occur, which has converted cysteic acid into cysteine monoxides and thus shifted vibrational bands at 1073 cm −1 and 1075 cm −1 for 6% and 9%, respectively.is indicates that sulfur and sulfur compounds play a key role in the surface treatment of wool fiber, and therefore, wool fibers from sulfur-deficient sheep may require mild processing.
Further investigations were done to assess the changes due to wool fiber treatment in the fiber structure by increasing the pH from 4 to 7. e infrared spectra of the fiber before and after fiber treatment were studied by using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy.
e results are shown in Figure 4.It can be seen that by increasing the pH, the transmittance value was also increased, which suggests possible degradation of sulfur and sulfur-based radicals on the surface of the wool fiber.Both the band frequencies of 1073 cm −1 and 1040 cm −1 were increased in terms of transmittance, suggesting the fiber surficial degradation.

Antibacterial Performance.
e antibacterial performance of nanocoated fabrics was associated with the interaction in between nanoparticles and the proteins, especially at thiol (sulfhydryl, -SH) groups.Since this moiety helps proteins to be entangled with it, likewise, this moiety have helped the enzyme to be adhered with it.On the adhesion, the cellular metabolism would have been inhibited causing the death of the microorganisms.An excellent antibacterial activity was achieved by wool fibers, as shown in Table 1.
It was manifested that the fabric sample coated with 6% Pro./AgNPs at pH 7 offered the poorer antibacterial property as compared to other samples.Although this antibacterial is a bit lesser than the antibacterial performance obtained by other samples at a pH of 4, yet it is also considerable.

Effect on Volume Resistivity of Wool Fibers.
Normally, a fiber with the resistance of 1 × 10 10 Ω•cm at RH 65% and 20 °C conditions can be considered as antistatic.e specific resistance of the synthetic fiber is more than 1 × 10 13 Ω•cm, and for wool fiber, it is about 1 × 10 11 Ω•cm.e specific test results are shown in Figure 5.
e volume resistivity of the samples treated with 3% protease/silver nanoparticles at pH 4 had the lowest resistance, while the samples treated with 6% protease/silver nanoparticles at high pH 7 had higher resistivity compared to others. is indicates that raising the pH can lead to low resistivity due to the effect of wool surface properties that are affected by high a pH.e damage of the cuticle cells may expose the inner parts of the fiber thus affecting its properties such as ion association on the fiber.As early stated, the amount of silver absorbed at a lower pH is higher, thus the lower resistance at a lower pH is obvious.

Effect on Half-Life Period of Wool
Fibers.Specific static half-life test results are shown in Figure 6.
e antistatic characteristics of the treated samples revealed that the electrostatic half-life was short in the samples treated using 3% protease.is is due to the quick dissipation of accumulated charges facilitated by more silver nanoparticles.e electrostatic half-life of the other samples also reduced significantly compared with 3% protease indicating that surface modification by scale stripping and treatment at high pH can affect antistatic properties of wool.
e effect of the scales on the loading of silver nanoparticles is that due to the scale layer composition which is made up of cysteine which helps bind the silver nanoparticles on the surface.It can be seen that the stripping of the scale layer reduces the electrostatic half-life of the fabric to a certain extent.It was observed that if the treated samples were washed with soap twenty times, the half-life will rise slightly although the treatment had a durable antistatic effect.

Effect on Interaction Voltage of Wool Fibers.
e antistatic treatment of friction-induced electrostatic voltage test is shown in Figure 7.
It can be seen that by using 3%, 6%, and 9% protease are all effective enough to reduce friction on the wool surface and even using less protease (i.e., 3%) incorporated with silver nanoparticles can significantly improve antistatic properties of wool.At higher pH, the wool surface can be affected and its antistatic properties are compromised.e electrostatic voltage dropped from 7000 V to 1400 V and even as low as 200 V. Incorporating silver nanoparticles and scale stripping can make wool fiber to have good antistatic properties even after washing in soap twenty times.

Effect on the Friction Coefficient.
e surface of the wool fibers is normally covered with scales, and these scales can degenerate to different degrees or levels by varying the percentage of protease used in scale stripping.After the treatment using a high percentage of protease, the outer layer of the scales was almost completely stripped and the surface became smoother.erefore, the surfaces of fibers with less stripped scales had higher friction but were still much improved as compared with the untreated fibers.e wool fiber friction coefficient test results are shown in Figure 8.
It can be also noted that scale stripping can achieve good frictional effects.
ese are indicated by the value of the difference of the coefficient of friction along the scale direction and/or against scales direction, which is greatly reduced.For that reason, incorporating silver nanoparticles in protease treatment of wool fibers was better at a lower percentage of protease and at a lower pH used.Scale stripping affects the S-S bonds and side groups on the wool cuticle that are essential in the loading of silver nanoparticles on wool.

Conclusions
e disulfide bond S-S is oxidized to cysteic acid residues by hydrogen peroxide, and increasing percentage of protease causes further changes to occur which converts cysteic acid Half-life and electrical voltage were all improved after treatment.e surface of the wool fibers is normally covered with scales, and these scales can degenerate to different degrees or levels by varying the percentage of protease used in scale stripping.After the treatment using a high percentage of protease, the outer layer of the scales was almost completely stripped and the surface became smoother.
erefore, the surfaces of fibers with less stripped scales had higher friction but were still much improved as compared with the untreated fibers.It can be also noted that scale stripping can achieve good frictional effects.ese are indicated by the value of the difference of the coefficient of friction along the scale direction or against scales direction, which is greatly reduced.erefore, incorporating silver nanoparticles in protease treatment of wool fibers was better at a lower pH and a lower percentage of protease used.Scale stripping affects the S-S bonds and side groups on the wool cuticle that are essential in the loading of silver nanoparticles on wool.µ kinetic against fiber scale direction µ kinetic in direction of fiber scale µ static against fiber scale direction µ static in direction of fiber scale Journal of Chemistry

Figure 3 :Figure 4 :
Figure 3: e Infrared Spectra of wool fibers after treatment with protease/silver NPs.
Figure 1: H 2 O 2 /protease and silver NPs process with varying percentage of protease and with varying pH.

Table 1 :
e antibacterial performance of wool fibers.Figure and 1075 cm −1 for 6% and 9% protease all at pH 4. is points out that sulfur and sulfur compounds play a key role in the surface treatment of wool fiber, and therefore, wool fibers from sulfur-deficient sheep may require mild processing.e volume resistivity is affected by the pH.High pH caused too high resistivity, while low pH had good conductivity; therefore, silver nanoparticles give better results if incorporated at pH 4.
6: e half-life period of wool after treatment.6Journal of Chemistry into cysteine monoxides of vibrational bands at 1073 cm −1