Journal of Chemistry
Volume 2020 (2020), Article ID 2189743, 9 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/2189743

Research Article

Synthesis and Biological Activity of 2-Arylidene-N-(quinolin-6-yl)hydrazine-1-carboxamides

Shengxian Zhao,¹ Yin Cao,² Zhenzhen Cui,² Jiayun Zhang,¹ Zhixiang Pan,¹ and Hongyu Hu1,3

¹College of Science and Technology, Ningbo University, Cixi 315302, China
²School of Pharmaceutical Sciences and the Key Laboratory for Chemical Biology of Fujian Province, Xiamen University, South Xiang-An Road, Xiamen 361102, China
³Xingzhi College, Zhejiang Normal University, Lanxi 321100, China

Correspondence should be addressed to Hongyu Hu; huhongyu22@126.com

Received 27 May 2020; Revised 27 July 2020; Accepted 3 August 2020; Published 20 August 2020

Academic Editor: Ales Imramovsky

Copyright © 2020 Shengxian Zhao et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

A series of 2-arylidene-N-(quinolin-6-yl)hydrazine-1-carboxamides 5a–5o were synthesized and characterized. The synthesized compounds (5a–5o) were screened in vitro against three breast cancer cell lines: SKBR3, MDA-MB-231, and MCF-7 cancer cell lines by the MTT assay. According to MTT results, compounds 5k and 5l showed better antiproliferative activities over MCF-7 cell lines with IC₅₀ values of 8.50 and 12.51 μM. Colony formation assay indicated 5k/5l treatment obviously inhibited the growth of MCF-7 cells and 5k/5l-induced cell cycle was arrested in the G2-M phase. Moreover, 5k/5l significantly increased the level of cleaved PARP and induced the apoptosis in MCF-7 cells. In addition, compared to Hela cells, MCF-7 cells were more sensitive to 5k/5l treatment.

1. Introduction

Breast cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors threatening the health of females all over the world, causing 23% of the total cancer cases and 14% of the cancer deaths [1]. It has become the fastest growing cancer in China, with an average annual growth rate of more than 3% [2]. Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease that shows remarkably different biological characteristics and clinical behaviors, it can be classified into five main subtypes: luminal, basal-like, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER-2), HER-2 expression, and normal breast-like subtypes [3]. Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients have the worst prognosis and distant metastasis-free survival among all major subtypes of breast cancer [4]. The standard treatment options for breast cancer include surgery, radiation, and/or anticancer drugs. Despite a number of active agents available today, it is still a huge clinical demand to discover more effective agents [5]. Quinoline ring system is the pharmacologically important structural scaffold displaying a wide range of biological activities [6–10]. Neratinib (Figure 1) is a quinoline derivative which was approved by FDA for the treatment of HER-2 breast cancer in patients [11]. The presence of urea functionality plays an important role in a drug’s aqueous solubility and permeability due to its dual nature as a hydrogen bond donor and acceptor; it also stabilizes the binding of compounds in the pocket [12]. Sorafenib, which is a urea derivative, has been used in the treatment of various cancers. Although it has shown limited efficacy in breast cancer as a single agent, sorafenib combined with other drugs in the treatment of breast cancer could be worth looking forward to [13]. The aromatic urea-quinazolines [14] which integrate the structural features of gefitinib and sorafenib and the thiourea derivatives [15] have already showed significant antibreast cancer activities.

Figure 1: Structure of neratinib.

Recently, we investigated various urea/thiourea derivatives as potential antitumor agents [16–20]. It was found in our previous studies that indole-substituted urea derivatives showed good antitumor activity [20]. A new class of urea derivatives 5a–5o (Figure 2) was designed by replacing the parent nucleus with a quinoline ring instead of a indole ring. Target compounds 5a–5o were synthesized and evaluated for their anticancer activity on three breast cancer cell lines: SKBR3, MDA-MB-231, and MCF-7 by MTT assay. The compounds 5k and 5l exhibited remarkable activities with IC₅₀ values of 8.50 and 12.51 μM over MCF-7 cell lines. On the basis of the results, further structural optimization and research will be carried out.

Figure 2: Structures of target compounds 5a–5o.

2. Experimental

All chemicals were analytically pure and purchased from commercial sources. All melting points were determined on a WRS-1B digital melting point apparatus (uncorrected). All new compounds were characterized by ¹H NMR, ¹³C NMR, and HRMS. NMR spectra were recorded in CDCl₃ or DMSO-d₆ on a Bruker AV 600 MHz instrument. HRMS spectra were obtained on an Agilent 6230 mass spectrometer. Human breast cell lines SKBR3, MDA-MB-231, and MCF7 were purchased from Shanghai Cell Bank, Chinese Academy of Sciences.

2.1. Synthesis of 6-Aminoquinoline 2 [21]

The solution of 6-nitroquinoline (174.2 mg, 1 mmol) in methanol (10 mL) was treated with Pd/C (10%, 14.0 mg). The reaction mixture was vigorously stirred under an atmosphere of hydrogen at room temperature. The progress of the reaction was monitored by TLC. After completion of the reaction, the reaction mixture was then filtered and concentrated in vacuo to give the crude product. The crude product was purified by column (ethyl acetate : petroleum ether = 1 : 4) to afford the product 2 (131.1 mg, 91.0%) as white solid. m.p. 116.8–119.0°C. ¹H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl₃) δ: 8.64 (d, J = 4.0 Hz, 1H), 7.89 (t, J = 9.7 Hz, 2H), 7.25 (t, J = 4.8 Hz, 1H), 7.14 (dd, J = 9.0 Hz, 2.6 Hz, 1H), 6.88 (d, J = 2.5 Hz, 1H), 3.84 (brs, 2H).

2.2. Synthesis of Phenyl Quinolin-6-ylcarbamate 3

A mixture of 2 (144.2 mg, 1 mmol) and triethylamine (203.8 mg, 2 mmol) in dichloromethane (6 mL) was degassed and flushed with nitrogen. The reaction mixture was cooled down to 5°C, a dichloromethane (6 mL) solution of phenyl chloroformate (156.6 mg, 1 mmol) was added dropwise, and the reaction was stirred overnight. The reaction mixture was washed by water (20 mL) twice, dried over sodium sulfate, filtered, and evaporated. The crude product was purified by column (ethyl acetate : petroleum ether = 1 : 4) to afford the product 3 (226.3 mg, 85.6%) as off-yellow solid. 164.6–167.6°C. ¹H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ: 10.64 (brs, 1H), 8.79 (dd, J = 1.3, 4.0 Hz, 1H), 8.27 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 8.18 (brs, 1H), 8.02 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 1H), 7.85 (dd, J = 2.3, 9.0 Hz, 1H), 7.50-7.42 (m, 3H), 7.33-7.24 (m, 3H); ¹³C NMR (150 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ: 152.3, 150.9, 149.5, 145.1, 137.1, 135.8, 130.2, 129.9, 129.3, 128.8, 127.5, 126.0, 122.4, 122.3; HRMS, m/z calcd. for C₁₆H₁₂N₂O₂Na [M+Na]⁺: 287.0791; found: 287.0801.

2.3. Synthesis of N-(Quinolin-6-yl)hydrazine Carboxamide 4

A mixture of 3 (264.3 mg, 1 mmol) and hydrazine hydrate solution (80%, 76.9 mmol, 3 mL) in ethanol (95%, 10 mL) was heated to reflux. The progress of the reaction was monitored by TLC. After completion of the reaction, the reaction mixture was cooled down to room temperature, and a white solid was precipitated out. The reaction mixture was filtered and dried, affording the product 4 (187.6 mg, 92.8%) as white solid. m.p. 200.5–200.8°C. ¹H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ: 9.04 (brs, 1H), 8.74 (dd, J = 1.7, 4.2 Hz, 1H), 8.33-8.13 (m, 2H), 7.95-7.91 (m, 1H), 7.91-7.87 (m, 1H), 7.67 (brs, 1H), 7.44 (dd, J = 4.2, 8.3 Hz, 1H), 4.50 (brs, 2H); ¹³C NMR (150 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ: 157.9, 148.6, 144.5, 138.5, 135.4, 129.7, 129.0, 123.8, 122.0, 113.2; HRMS, m/z calcd. for C₁₀H₁₁N₄O [M+H]⁺: 203.0927, found: 203.0930.

General Procedure for the Synthesis of 2-Arylidene-N-(quinolin-6-yl)hydrazine-1-carboxamides 5a–5o. A mixture of 4 (202.2 mg, 1 mmol) and aldehyde (1 mmol) in absolute alcohol (15 mL) was heated to reflux. The progress of the reaction was monitored by TLC. After completion of the reaction, the reaction mixture was cooled down to room temperature, and a white solid was precipitated out. The reaction mixture was filtered and dried, affording the products 5a–5o.

2.3.1. 2-Benzylidene-N-(quinolin-6-yl)hydrazine-1-carboxamide (5a)

Product 5a was obtained as white solid, yield 87.9%. m.p. 217.22–17.5°C. ¹H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ: 10.97 (s, 1H), 9.29 (s, 1H), 8.79 (dd, J = 1.7, 4.22 Hz, 1H), 8.36 (d, J = 2.4 Hz, 1H), 8.29 (dd, J = 1.0, 8.7 Hz, 1H), 8.11 (dd, J = 2.4, 9.0 Hz, 1H), 8.04 (s, 1H), 8.00 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 1H), 7.94-7.89 (m, 2H), 7.50-7.45 (m, 3H), 7.44-7.41 (m, 1H); ¹³C NMR (150 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ: 153.7, 149.1, 145.0, 141.7, 137.7, 135.7, 134.8, 130.0, 129.5, 129.1, 128.8, 127.6, 124.9, 122.1, 115.4; HRMS, m/z calcd. for C₁₇H₁₄N₄ONa [M+Na]⁺: 313.1060; found: 313.1062.

2.3.2. 2-(2-Methylbenzylidene)-N-(quinolin-6-yl)hydrazine-1-carboxamide (5b)

Product 5b was obtained as white solid, yield 82.6%. m.p. 215.1–216.1°C. ¹H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ: 10.91 (s, 1H), 9.24 (s, 1H), 8.78 (d, J = 3.1 Hz, 1H), 8.35 (d, J = 1.5 Hz, 1H), 8.33 (s, 1H), 8.27 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 8.22-8.18 (m, 1H), 8.08 (dd, J = 1.9,9.0 Hz, 1H), 7.98 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 1H), 7.47 (dd, J = 4.1, 8.1 Hz, 1H), 7.31-7.25 (m, 2H), 7.25-7.21 (m, 1H), 2.42 (s, 3H); ¹³C NMR (150 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ:153.6, 149.1, 144.9, 140.2, 137.7, 136.7, 135.7, 132.7, 131.1, 129.7, 129.5, 128.8, 126.5, 126.5, 124.8, 122.1, 115.3, 19.4; HRMS, m/z calcd. for C₁₈H₁₆N₄ONa [M+Na]⁺: 327.1216, found: 327.1215.

2.3.3. 2-(3-Methylbenzylidene)-N-(quinolin-6-yl)hydrazine-1-carboxamide (5c)

Product 5c was obtained as white solid, yield 84.0%. m.p. 202.0–204.0°C. ¹H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ: 10.96 (s, 1H), 9.29 (s, 1H), 8.87-8.69 (m, 1H), 8.36 (brs, 1H), 8.32-8.25 (m, 1H), 8.10 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 8.02-7.92 (m, 2H), 7.72–7.64 (m, 2H), 7.53-7.45 (m, 1H), 7.32 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 7.21 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 2.36 (brs, 3H); ¹³C NMR (150 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ: 153.6, 148.9, 144.5, 141.9, 138.3, 137.8, 136.1, 134.7, 130.7, 129.2, 129.0, 128.8, 127.9, 125.1, 124.9, 122.1, 115.4, 21.4; HRMS, m/z calcd. for C₁₈H₁₇N₄O [M+H]⁺: 305.1397, found: 305.1398.

2.3.4. 2-(4-Methylbenzylidene)-N-(quinolin-6-yl)hydrazine-1-carboxamide (5d)

Product 5d was obtained as white solid, yield 74.9%. m.p. 207.5–208.7°C. ¹H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ: 10.89 (s, 1H), 9.24 (s, 1H), 8.77 (dd, J = 1.7, 4.2 Hz, 1H), 8.34 (d, J = 2.4 Hz, 1H), 8.27 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 8.09 (dd, J = 2.3, 9.1 Hz, 1H), 8.00-7.96 (m, 2H), 7.78 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H), 7.47 (dd, J = 4.0, 8.3 Hz, 1H), 7.25 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H), 2.34 (s, 3H); ¹³C NMR (150 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ:153.7, 149.1, 144.9, 141.8, 139.7, 137.7, 135.7, 132.1, 129.7, 129.5, 128.8, 127.6, 124.9, 122.1, 115.4, 21.5; HRMS, m/z calcd. for C₁₈H₁₇N₄O [M+H]⁺: 305.1397, found: 305.1401.

2.3.5. 2-(2-Hydroxybenzylidene)-N-(quinolin-6-yl)hydrazine-1-carboxamide (5e)

Product 5e was obtained as white solid, yield 80.9%. m.p. 210.5–211.6°C. ¹H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ: 11.09 (brs, 1H), 9.62 (brs, 1H), 9.02 (d, J = 4.8 Hz, 1H), 8.83 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 8.58 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 1H), 8.34 (s, 1H), 8.27 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 8.15 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 1H), 7.99 (brs, 1H), 7.83 (dd, J = 5.0, 8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.32-7.18 (m, 1H), 6.96-6.83 (m, 2H); ¹³C NMR (150 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ: 159.5, 159.2, 156.8, 153.3, 145.2, 142.1, 139.7, 138.1, 131.3, 129.6, 127.7, 124.5, 122.4, 120.6, 119.6, 116.5, 114.9; HRMS, m/z calcd. for C₁₇H₁₅N₄O₂ [M+H]⁺: 307.1190, found: 307.1193.

2.3.6. 2-(4-Hydroxybenzylidene)-N-(quinolin-6-yl)hydrazine-1-carboxamide (5f)

Product 5f was obtained as white solid, yield 85.7%. m.p. 266.9–269.7°C. ¹H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ: 10.76 (s, 1H), 9.91 (s, 1H), 9.19 (s, 1H), 8.77 (dd, J = 1.7, 4.0 Hz, 1H), 8.35 (d, J = 2.2 Hz, 1H), 8.26 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 8.09 (dd, J = 2.4, 9.0 Hz, 1H), 7.98 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 1H), 7.93 (s, 1H), 7.73 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H), 7.46 (dd, J = 4.2, 8.25 Hz, 1H), 6.86 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H); ¹³C NMR (150 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ: 159.4, 153.7, 149.0, 144.8, 142.0, 137.8, 135.7, 129.5, 129.3, 128.8, 125.9, 124.8, 122.1, 116.0, 115.1; HRMS, m/z calcd. for C₁₇H₁₅N₄O₂ [M+H]⁺: 307.1190, found: 307.1187.

2.3.7. 2-(4-(Dimethylamino)benzylidene)-N-(quinolin-6-yl)hydrazine-1-carboxamide (5g)

Product 5g was obtained as white solid, yield 83.4%. m.p. 195.1–196.9°C. ¹H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ: 10.65 (s, 1H), 9.15 (s, 1H), 8.76 (dd, J = 1.6, 4.13 Hz, 1H), 8.34 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 1H), 8.26 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 8.08 (dd, J = 2.2, 9.0 Hz, 1H), 7.96 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 1H), 7.88 (s, 1H), 7.69 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H), 7.46 (dd, J = 4.0, 8.2 Hz, 1H), 6.74 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H), 2.97 (s, 6H); ¹³C NMR (150 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ: 153.7, 151.6, 149.0, 144.8, 142.6, 137.9, 135.6, 132.0, 129.5, 128.9, 124.8, 122.3, 122.1, 114.9, 112.1, 40.3; HRMS, m/z calcd. for C₁₉H₁₉N₅ONa [M+Na]⁺: 356.1482, found: 356.1494.

2.3.8. 2-(4-Fluorobenzylidene)-N-(quinolin-6-yl)hydrazine-1-carboxamide (5h)

Product 5h was obtained as white solid, yield 80.5%. m.p. 207.0–208.5°C. ¹H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ: 10.96 (s, 1H), 9.29 (s, 1H), 8.77 (d, J = 2.6 Hz, 1H), 8.33 (d, J = 1.8 Hz, 1H), 8.27 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 8.08 (dd, J = 2.0, 9.0 Hz, 1H), 8.00 (s, 1H), 7.99-7.95 (m, 3H), 7.47 (dd, J = 4.1, 8.2 Hz, 1H), 7.29 (t, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H); ¹³C NMR (150 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ: 164.1, 162.5, 153.7, 147.0 (d, J = 321.8 Hz), 140.5, 137.7, 135.7, 131.4 (d, J = 1.5 Hz), 129.7 (d, J = 3.8 Hz), 129.5, 128.8, 124.9, 122.1, 116.1 (d, J = 10.5 Hz), 115.0; HRMS, m/z calcd. for C₁₇H₁₄FN₄O [M+H]⁺: 309.1146; found: 309.1134.

2.3.9. 2-(4-Methoxybenzylidene)-N-(quinolin-6-yl)hydrazine-1-carboxamide (5i)

Product 5i was obtained as white solid, yield 79.0%. m.p. 188.0–189.1°C. ¹H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ: 10.81 (s, 1H), 9.22 (s, 1H), 8.77 (dd, J = 1.3, 3.8 Hz, 1H), 8.33 (d, J = 1.8 Hz, 1H), 8.27 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 8.08 (dd, J = 1.9, 9.0 Hz, 1H), 7.99-7.94 (m, 2H), 7.84 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H), 7.47 (dd, J = 4.2, 8.2 Hz, 1H), 7.01 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H), 3.81 (s, 3H); ¹³C NMR (150 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ: 160.9, 153.7, 149.0, 144.9, 141.6, 137.8, 135.7, 129.5, 129.2, 128.8, 127.4, 124.8, 122.1, 115.2, 114.6, 55.7; HRMS, m/z calcd. for C₁₈H₁₇N₄O₂ [M+H]⁺: 321.1346, found 321.1349.

2.3.10. 2-(3-Bromobenzylidene)-N-(quinolin-6-yl)hydrazine-1-carboxamide (5j)

Product 5j was obtained as white solid, yield 81.2%. m.p. 237.5–239.9°C. ¹H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ: 11.21 (s, 1H), 9.34 (s, 1H), 8.78 (dd, J = 1.6, 4.1 Hz, 1H), 8.42 (dd, J = 1.5, 7.9 Hz, 1H), 8.38 (s, 1H), 8.33 (d, J = 2.4 Hz, 1H), 8.28 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 8.08 (dd, J = 2.3, 9.1 Hz, 1H), 7.98 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 1H), 7.67 (dd, J = 0.9, 8.1 Hz, 1H), 7.51-7.44 (m, 2H), 7.34 (dt, J = 1.7, 7.6 Hz, 1H); ¹³C NMR (150 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ: 153.5, 149.2, 145.0, 139.9, 137.5, 135.7, 133.5, 133.4, 131.6, 129.5, 128.8, 128.4, 128.3, 125.0, 123.5, 122.1, 115.7; HRMS, m/z calcd. for C₁₇H₁₄BrN₄O [M+H]⁺: 369.0346, found: 369.0350.

2.3.11. 2-(3,4-Dimethoxybenzylidene)-N-(quinolin-6-yl)hydrazine-1-carboxamide (5k)

Product 5k was obtained as white solid, yield 85.4%. m.p. 191.1–193.1°C. ¹H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ: 10.92 (s, 1H), 9.38 (brs, 1H), 8.83 (d, J = 2.9 Hz, 1H), 8.44 (brs, 1H), 8.40 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 8.12 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 8.03 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 1H), 7.97 (s, 1H), 7.60 (brs, 1H), 7.54 (dd, J = 4.0, 7.9 Hz, 1H), 7.27 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 6.99 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 3.89 (s, 3H), 3.80 (s, 3H); ¹³C NMR (150 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ: 153.7, 150.8, 149.5, 148.1, 143.3, 142.1, 138.2, 137.3, 129.0, 128.3, 127.6, 125.6, 122.1, 121.9, 115.1, 111.8, 109.6, 56.1, 56.0; HRMS, m/z calcd. for C₁₉H₁₈N₄O₃Na [M+Na]⁺: 373.1271; found: 373.1278.

2.3.12. 2-(2,4-Dimethoxybenzylidene)-N-(quinolin-6-yl)hydrazine-1-carboxamide (5l)

Product 5l was obtained as white solid, yield 90.1%. m.p. 195.–195.7°C. ¹H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ: 10.88 (s, 1H), 9.37 (brs, 1H), 8.92 (d, J = 3.7 Hz, 1H), 8.59 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 8.49 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 1H), 8.28 (s, 1H), 8.23 (dd, J = 1.8, 9.0 Hz, 1H), 8.18-8.13 (m, 1H), 8.07 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 1H), 7.68 (dd, J = 4.6, 8.3 Hz, 1H), 6.61 (dd, J = 2.2, 4.2 Hz, 2H), 3.85 (s, 3H), 3.82 (s, 3H); ¹³C NMR (150 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ: 162.5, 159.2, 153.6, 146.6, 140.6, 139.7, 139.0, 137.6, 129.3, 127.8, 126.7, 126.3, 122.2, 115.5, 115.0, 106.7, 98.3, 56.1, 55.8; HRMS, m/z calcd. for C₁₉H₁₈N₄O₃Na [M+Na]⁺: 373.1271; found: 373.1278.

2.3.13. 2-(Pyridin-2-ylmethylene)-N-(quinolin-6-yl)hydrazine-1-carboxamide (5m)

Product 5m was obtained as white solid, yield 78.0%. m.p. 212.5–214.3°C. ¹H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ: 11.14 (s, 1H), 9.34 (s, 1H), 9.05 (d, J = 1.7 Hz, 1H), 8.78 (dd, J = 1.7, 4.2 Hz, 1H), 8.59 (dd, J = 1.6, 4.7 Hz, 1H), 8.36 (td, J = 1.7, 8.0 Hz, 1H), 8.33 (d, J = 2.2 Hz, 1H), 8.28 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 8.08 (dd, J = 2.3, 9.0 Hz, 1H), 8.03 (s, 1H), 7.98 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 1H), 7.52-7.42 (m, 2H); ¹³C NMR (150 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ: 153.6, 150.5, 149.2, 149.1, 145.0, 138.7, 137.6, 135.7, 134.2, 130.7, 129.5, 128.7, 125.0, 124.2, 122.1, 115.7; HRMS, m/z calcd. for C₁₆H₁₄N₅O [M+H]⁺: 292.1193; found: 292.1195.

2.3.14. 2-(Furan-2-ylmethylene)-N-(quinolin-6-yl)hydrazine-1-carboxamide (5n)

Product 5n was obtained as white solid, yield 79.4%. m.p. 205.4–206.0°C. ¹H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ: 10.93 (s, 1H), 9.10 (s, 1H), 8.77 (d, J = 2.8 Hz, 1H), 8.31 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 1H), 8.26 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 8.00–8.06 (m, 1H), 7.92–7.99 (m, 2H), 7.83 (s, 1H), 7.46 (dd, J = 4.0, 8.3 Hz, 1H), 7.00 (d, J = 3.3 Hz, 1H), 6.64 (dd, J = 1.7, 3.2 Hz, 1H); ¹³C NMR (150 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ: 153.4, 150.1, 149.1, 145.0, 144.9, 137.6, 135.7, 132.0, 129.6, 128.8, 124.6, 122.1, 115.1, 112.6, 112.5; HRMS, m/z calcd. for C₁₅H₁₂N₄O₂Na [M+Na]⁺: 303.0852; found: 303.0861.

2.3.15. 2-(Thiophen-2-ylmethylene)-N-(quinolin-6-yl)hydrazine-1-carboxamide (5o)

Product 5o was obtained as white solid, yield 77.9%. m.p. 214.7–217.3°C. ¹H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ: 11.04 (s, 1H), 9.32 (brs.,1H), 9.03-8.85 (m, 1H), 8.65 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 8.46 (d, J = 1.8 Hz, 1H), 8.23 (s, 1H), 8.15 (dd, J = 2.0, 9.0 Hz, 1H), 8.08 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 1H), 7.72 (dd, J = 4.6, 8.3 Hz, 1H), 7.66 (d, J = 5.0 Hz, 1H), 7.47 (d, J = 3.3 Hz, 1H), 7.13 (dd, J = 3.8, 4.9 Hz, 1H); ¹³C NMR (150 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ: 159.5, 153.2, 146.4, 140.1, 139.3, 139.0, 137.5, 130.3, 129.3, 128.7, 128.2, 126.7, 126.1, 122.3, 114.9; HRMS, m/z calcd. for C₁₅H₁₃N₄OS [M+H]⁺: 297.0805, found: 297.0811.

2.4. Antitumor Activities

The in vitro antiproliferation activity of target compounds 5a–5o against three human breast cancer lines including SKBR3, MDA-MB-231, and MCF-7 cancer cell lines was measured by the MTT colorimetric method. In all experiments, cells in good condition and logarithmic growth phase were taken and digested by 0.25% trypsin. The adherent cells were detached and counted, a 2–410⁴ cells/mL suspension was prepared and inoculated into a 96-well cell culture plate with 180 μL a well, placed in a constant-temperature carbon dioxide incubator and cultured for 24 h, then was replaced with the dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) solution of target compound (20 μL) a well, and added 10 vol% serum culture medium (80 μL), and cultured for 48 h. MTT (20 μL) was added to each well and reacted for 4 h. The supernatant was removed and DMSO (150 μL per well) was added to dissolve MTT. The plate was shaken on a platform rocker for five minutes, and the optical density (OD) of each well was measured on an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) meter at the wavelength of 570 nm. The inhibition activity of cell proliferation was determined. Dissolvent control group was used as the negative control group, and target compounds 5a–5o were used as the positive control group. The inhibition rate of target compounds on tumor cell growth was calculated according to the following formula: inhibition rate% = (OD value of the negative control−OD value of tested compound)/OD value of the negative control×100%. The IC₅₀ value of target compounds was calculated based on the inhibition rates of different concentrations.

2.5. Colony Formation Assay

MCF-7 cells and Hela cells were cultured in a 6-well plate (200 cells/well) and treated with various compounds in 10% serum medium for 12 days and then fixed with methanol and stained with 0.1% crystal violet.

2.6. Annexin V/PI Staining

Cells were cultured in a six-well plate with about 1 × 10⁵ cells in each well and treated with 10 μM 5k and 5l for 24 h. Then, the apoptosis analysis was performed following the protocols (BD Bioscience). After stained with FITC annexin V/PI, the apoptosis status was analyzed using a Beckman Epics Altra Culter and data was analyzed with EXP032 software. The status and percentage of cells undergoing apoptosis were defined as early apoptosis (annexin V-positive and PI-negative) and late apoptosis (annexin V-positive and PI-positive).

2.7. Western Blot Analysis

To check the level of cleaved PARP1 after 5k and 5l treatment, the western blot was performed using PARP1 antibody (9542, CST, Shanghai, China); meanwhile, the GAPDH antibody (G8795, Sigma) was used as the control. After different concentrations of 5k/5l treatment for 24 h, the whole cell lysates were used for western blot analysis. Both anti-rabbit and anti-mouse IgG were purchased from Sigma.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Chemistry

The synthetic strategy to prepare target compounds is outlined in Scheme 1. The intermediate 2 was obtained from classical reduction of 6-nitroquinoline, compound 3 was prepared by acylation of intermediate 2, and derivative 4 was generated from substitution reaction between compound 3 and 80% hydrazine hydrate solution. Target products 5a–5o were synthesized from condensation of derivative 4 with aldehydes. The structures of target compounds 5a–5o were characterized by ¹H NMR,¹³C NMR, and HRMS.

Scheme 1: Synthesis of target compounds 5a–5o. (a) Pt/C, H₂, MeOH; (b) phenyl chloroformate, triethylamine, DCM; (c) 80% hydrazine hydrate, 95% ethanol; (d) aldehydes, ethanol.

3.2. Antitumor Activities

The in vitro cytotoxic activity of target compounds 5a–5o was evaluated in three human breast cancer cell lines including SKBR3, MDA-MB-231, and MCF-7 by the MTT assay, and Tamoxifen was used as the positive control. The concentration required for 50% inhibition of cell viability (IC₅₀) was calculated and is summarized in Table 1. Among the synthesized compounds (5a–5o), the cytotoxic activity order is as follows: compounds 5h–5l bearing methoxy or halogen-substituted phenyl group ≈ compounds 5m–5o bearing pyridyl, furyl, and thienyl group >compounds 5a–5g bearing nonsubstituted or other substituted phenyl group. Compound 5k with the substitution of 3,4-dimethoxyphenyl and 5l with the substitution of 2,4-dimethoxyphenyl displayed better antiproliferative activities against tested cancer cell lines than other compounds, and both of them exhibited more potential cytotoxicity on MCF-7 cell line than SKBr3 and MDA-MB-231 cell lines with IC₅₀ of 8.50 and 12.5 μM. MCF-10A cells (normal breast cell line) were used to evaluate the cytotoxicity of 5k and 5l in the normal cell line. The results showed that 5k and 5l had no antiproliferative activity on MCF-10A cells with an IC₅₀ >100 μmol/L, indicating the good selectivity of both compounds.

Table 1: The cytotoxicity of target compounds 5a–5o against SKBr3, MDA-MB-231, and MCF-7 cancer cell lines.

Compounds
Substituents
IC₅₀ (μmol/L)

R
SKBr3
MDA-MB-231
MCF-7

5a

47.89 ± 0.44
45.55 ± 0.56
34.34 ± 0.50

5b

43.80 ± 0.12
35.55 ± 0.22
37.34 ± 0.16

5c

33.82 ± 0.33
35.35 ± 0.19
35.87 ± 0.13

5d

43.22 ± 0.26
33.78 ± 0.22
34.32 ± 1.23

5e

23.12 ± 0.16
23.78 ± 0.27
27.54 ± 0.18

5f

23.45 ± 0.26
27.78 ± 0.33
24.50 ± 0.23

5g

23.10 ± 0.26
20.33 ± 0.21
27.51 ± 0.33

5h

17.10 ± 0.26
16.33 ± 0.11
13.51 ± 0.13

5i

15.16 ± 0.11
17.39 ± 0.12
13.51 ± 0.14

5j

17.10 ± 0.20
17.55 ± 0.23
14.52 ± 0.32

5k

9.16 ± 0.11
10.34 ± 0.36
8.50 ± 0.26

5l

16.10 ± 0.11
15.39 ± 0.46
12.51 ± 0.33

5m

19.20 ± 0.11
18.30 ± 0.15
16.33 ± 0.12

5n

16.11 ± 0.12
15.33 ± 0.26
16.51 ± 0.21

5o

14.18 ± 0.22
16.30 ± 0.34
13.56 ± 0.11

Tamoxifen

7.54 ± 0.16
10.68 ± 0.23
9.05 ± 0.22

3.3. The Biological Activity of 5k and 5l in MCF-7 Cells

According to the MTT assay of this series of compounds displayed in Table 1, compounds 5k and 5l significantly inhibited the proliferation of MCF-7 cells. Therefore, compounds 5k and 5l were selected for further cellular experiments. The MTT results showed that 5k and 5l had antiproliferation activities with the IC₅₀ values 8.50 and 12.51 μM; so, firstly we detected their growth inhibitory activities based on colony formation assay, which indicated 5k and 5l significantly inhibited MCF-7 cell growth at the concentration of 10 μM (Figure 3(a)). Besides, colony formation assay was conducted on HeLa cells, the results showed that compared with HeLa cells, 5k and 5l seemed to have stronger antiproliferation activities on MCF-7 cells. As acknowledged, cell cycle is essential for the normal proliferation of cells. To figure out the effects of 5k and 5l on cell cycle, flow cytometry was performed after 12 h treatment with 5k/5l at a concentration of 10 μM. The results revealed that 5k/5l induced cell cycle arrest in the G2-M phase with the ratio increasing from 6.19% to 17.40%/18.66% on MCF-7 cells, suggesting that the growth inhibitory of compounds 5k and 5l might be related to cell cycle arrest. Interestingly, when HeLa cells were treated with compounds 5k and 5l, contrasting to MCF-7 cells, no significant change of cell cycle was observed in HeLa cells. The data implied that 5k and 5l were more sensitive to breast cancer cell lines than the Hela cell line (Figure 3(b)).

(a)

(b)

Figure 3: Effects of compounds 5k and 5l on colony formation and cell cycle disruption: (a) compounds 5k and 5l inhibited cell growth on MCF-7 cells. (b) Compounds 5k and 5l induced G2-M phase arrest.

Subsequently, in order to test whether 5k and 5l could induce apoptosis on MCF-7 cells, cleaved PARP (the mark of apoptosis) was detected by western blot assay after 24 h treatment with 5k and 5l on MCF-7 cells. The results showed that the PARP cleavage increased in a dose-dependent manner (Figure 4(a)). Moreover, after the treatment with 5k and 5l for 24 h, the MCF-7 or HeLa cells were doubly stained with annexin V/PI (propidium iodide). The results suggested that both 5k and 5l could notably promote apoptosis. Consistent with the abovementioned hypothesis that 5k and 5l had less effect on Hela cells, this result further confirmed that compounds 5k and 5l had the specificity on the MCF-7 cell line (Figure 4(b)).

(a)

(b)

Figure 4: Apoptosis induction by compounds 5k and 5l. (a) Western blot analysis of PARP in MCF-7 cells treated with different concentrations of compounds 5k and 5l. (b) Annexin V/PI staining of MCF-7 cells and Hela cells treated with 10 μM 5k and 5l for 24 h.

4. Conclusions

A series of 2-arylidene-N-(quinolin-6-yl)hydrazine-1-carboxamides 5a–5o were designed and synthesized based on combination of the biological profiles of the quinoline ring and the urea group. The reaction condition was optimized and fifteen target compounds 5a–5o were achieved under best condition. The structures of target compounds 5a–5o were characterized by ¹H NMR, ¹³C NMR, and HRMS. The cytotoxic activity in vitro of compounds 5a–5o against SKBR3, MDA-MB-231, and MCF7 cell lines was evaluated by the MTT assay, and compound 5k displayed the most potential cytotoxic activity with IC₅₀ values of 9.16 μmol/L, 10.34 μmol/L, and 8.50 μmol/L against SKBR3, MDA-MB-231, and MCF-7, respectively. Additionally, compounds 5k and 5l showed better antiproliferative activities over MCF-7 cell lines with IC₅₀ values of 8.50 and 12.51 μM. Colony formation assay showed 5k/5l had a growth inhibitory effect on MCF-7 cells. Moreover, the results of western blot and flow cytometry indicated that 5k/5l could significantly induce apoptosis. Interestingly, compared to Hela cells, MCF-7 cells were more susceptible to 5k/5l treatment. On the basis of the results, further structural optimization and research will be carried out.

Data Availability

The data supporting the findings of the study are already given within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

Shengxian Zhao and Yin Cao contributed equally to this work.

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Innovative Drug Target Research (FJ-YW-2019KF01) and sponsored by K.C. Wong Magna Fund in Ningbo University and Ningbo 3315 Innovative Talents Program.

References

J. Liu, B. Ming, G.-H. Gong, D. Wang, G.-L. Bao, and L.-J. Yu, “Current research on anti-breast cancer synthetic compounds,” RSC Advances, vol. 8, no. 8, pp. 4386–4416, 2018.

W. X. Xuan, T. Guo, and F. S. Wang, “Breast cancer treatment progress,” Chinese Remedies & Clinics, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 203–205, 2015.

C. M. Perou, T. Sørlie, M. B. Eisen et al., “Molecular portraits of human breast tumours,” Nature, vol. 406, no. 6797, pp. 747–752, 2000.

M. Shen, Y.-Z. Jiang, Y. Wei et al., “Tinagl1 suppresses triple-negative breast cancer progression and metastasis by simultaneously inhibiting integrin/FAK and EGFR signaling,” Cancer Cell, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 64–80, 2019.

G. P. Nagaraju, S. Aliya, S. F. Zafar, R. Basha, R. Diaz, and B. F. El-Rayes, “The impact of curcumin on breast cancer,” Integrative Biology, vol. 4, no. 9, pp. 996–1007, 2012.

R. A. Al-Qawasmeh, B. Huthail, M. O. Sinnokrot et al., “Design, Synthesis and qualitative structure activity relationship evaluations of quinoline-based bisarylimidazoles as antibacterial motifs,” Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 563–573, 2016.

S. Cretton, S. Dorsaz, A. Azzollini et al., “Antifungal quinoline alkaloids fromWaltheria indica,” Journal of Natural Products, vol. 79, no. 2, pp. 300–307, 2016.

X.-Q. Deng, M.-X. Song, Y. Zheng, and Z.-S. Quan, “Design, synthesis and evaluation of the antidepressant and anticonvulsant activities of triazole-containing quinolinones,” European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 73, pp. 217–224, 2014.

M. Ratheesh, G. Sindhu, and A. Helen, “Anti-inflammatory effect of quinoline alkaloid skimmianine isolated from Ruta graveolens L.,” Inflammation Research, vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 367–376, 2013.

V. Sharma, D. K. Mehta, and D. Rina, “Synthetic methods of quinoline derivatives as potent anticancer agents,” Mini-Reviews in Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 17, no. 16, pp. 1557–1572, 2017.

E. D. Deeks, “Neratinib: First global approval,” Drugs, vol. 77, no. 15, pp. 1695–1704, 2017.

A. K. Ghosh and M. Brindisi, “Urea derivatives in modern drug discovery and medicinal chemistry,” Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 63, no. 6, pp. 2751–2788, 2020.

G. Bronte, D. Andreis, S. Bravaccini et al., “Sorafenib for the treatment of breast cancer,” Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 621–630, 2017.

Y. Zhao, J.-M. Gu, Q.-Y. Ma et al., “Design, synthesis and antitumor activity of aromatic urea-quinazolines,” Future Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 11, no. 21, pp. 2821–2830, 2019.

M. A. Bhat, A. Al-Dhfyan, A. A. Khan et al., “Targeting HER-2 over expressed breast cancer cells with 2-cyclohexyl-N-[(Z)-(substituted phenyl/furan-2-yl/thiophene-2-yl)methylidene]hydrazinecarbothioamide,” Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 83–87, 2015.

H. Hu, J. Wu, M. Ao et al., “Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of methylenehydrazine-1-carboxamide derivatives with (5-((4-(pyridin-3-yl)pyrimidin-2-yl)amino)-1H-indole scaffold: novel potential CDK9 inhibitors,” Bioorganic Chemistry, vol. 102, Article ID 104064, 2020.

H. Hu, J. Wu, J. Yuan et al., “Synthesis and biological activity research of 4-Substitued-1-(2-methyl-6-(pyridin-3-yl)-nicotinoyl) semicarbazides,” Chinese Journal of Organic Chemistry, vol. 39, no. 9, pp. 2507–2514, 2019.

H. Y. Hu, W. D. Zhang, J. F. Wu, X. L. Zhang, H. J. Sheng, and S. X. Zhao, “Synthesis and antitumor activities of phenylpyridine substituted semicarbazides,” Chinese Pharmaceutical Journal, vol. 54, no. 12, pp. 947–952, 2019.

H. Hu, C. Lin, M. Ao et al., “Synthesis and biological evaluation of 1-(2-(adamantane-1-yl)-1H-indol-5-yl)-3-substituted urea/thiourea derivatives as anticancer agents,” RSC Advances, vol. 7, no. 81, pp. 51640–51651, 2017.

H. Y. Hu, J. Wu, M. T. Ao et al., “Synthesis, structure–activity relationship studies and biological evaluation of novel 2,5‐disubstituted indole derivatives as anticancer agents,” Chemical Biology Drug Design, vol. 88, no. 8, pp. 766–778, 2016.

M. Somei, K. Kato, and S. Inoue, “Titanium (III) chloride for the reduction of heteroaromatic and aromatic nitro compounds,” Chemical & Pharmaceutical Bulletin, vol. 28, no. 8, pp. 2515–2518, 1980.