Journal of Control Science and Engineering
Volume 2015 (2015), Article ID 349186, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/349186

Research Article

Human Simulated Intelligent Control with Double-Direction Dead-Zone Compensation for Joint Motion Control of a Large-Sized Boom System

Rongsheng Liu, Yingjie Gao, Yulin Yang, and Yanlong Liu

College of Mechanical Engineering, Yanshan University, 438 Hebei Avenue, Qinhuangdao 066004, China

Received 23 December 2014; Accepted 28 April 2015

Academic Editor: Onur Toker

Copyright © 2015 Rongsheng Liu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

Joint motion control of a 52-meter-long five-boom system driven by proportional hydraulic system is developed. It has been considered difficult due to strong nonlinearities and parametric uncertainties, the effect of which increases with the size of booms. A human simulated intelligent control scheme is developed to improve control performance by modifying control mode and control parameters. In addition, considering the negative effects caused by frequent and redundant reverse actions of the proportional valve, a double-direction compensation scheme is proposed to deal with the dead-zone nonlinearity of proportional valve. Sinusoidal motions are implemented on a real boom system. The results indicate that HSIC controller can improve control accuracy, and dead-zone nonlinearity is effectively compensated by proposed compensation scheme without introducing frequent reverse actions of proportional valve.

1. Introduction

Large-sized boom system driven by proportional hydraulic system is widely applied for material handling and earth moving in construction, mainly due to high forces to weight ratio and large working space which can be well reflected by construction machinery such as truck mounted concrete pump, telescopic handler, and crane. However, manual operation has been the main operation mode, with which not only construction quality and efficiency are limited, but additional assistance from workers is also needed, which may increase the probability of unpredictable personal injury. Therefore, automation of the large-sized boom system is required. In [1], a semiautomatic control system for hydraulic excavator is developed to simplify operation mode. With respect to truck mounted concrete pump, an automatic pouring approach is proposed for the repetitive tasks [2]. To accomplish semiautomated assembly of facade panels, an automatic control system of an upgraded telescopic handler is proposed [3].

Joint motion control is the basis for accomplishing automation of the boom system. Unfortunately, various nonlinearities and parametric uncertainties induced by mechanical structures and hydraulic components may deteriorate control performance seriously. Therefore, joint motion control becomes more difficult due to these factors. In [4], the adaptive robust control (ARC) is proposed for hydraulic robot arms with taking uncertain nonlinearities and strong coupling among various hydraulic actuators into account. A fixed cascade controller with an adaptive dead-zone compensation scheme to overcome nonlinearities is proposed [5, 6]. Time-delay control with a compensator is adopted to achieve a straight-line motion of a real heavy-duty excavator under working speed conditions [7]. A discontinuous projection based adaptive robust controller is proposed for the motion control of single-rod hydraulic actuators regulated by proportional directional control valve in [8]. In [9], a new control approach called adaptive switching learning PD control is proposed for trajectory tracking of robot manipulators with faster convergence rate.

In addition, the severity of these problems appears to increase with the size of booms. In this work, joint motion control of a 52-meter-long five-boom system of truck mounted concrete pump is studied, but fewer research works have been focused on. In [10], a closed-loop detection and open-loop control strategy is proposed for single joint control to avoid exciting vibration, and it is evaluated through computer simulation. Real-time, simple and effective control strategy is essentially required for joint motion control in practice. Human-simulated intelligent control (HSIC) as an intelligent control strategy has been used to solve complex control problems. In [11, 12], HSIC has been applied to accomplish the swinging-up and handstand control of cart double pendulum system. To attenuate unwanted vibration of magneto rheological suspension system of a passenger car, HSIC controller is designed according to the expert’s experience [13]. In this work, motion control level and self-turning level are developed for joint motion control of the large-sized boom system.

Dead-zone in proportional valve due to spool overlap is a hard nonlinearity which can lead to performance degradation of the controller and instability in the closed-loop system. To overcome the negative effects of the dead-zone nonlinearity, many works based on modern techniques have been published. Direct dead-zone inverse is used to compensate the negative effects of the dead-zone nonlinearity in [3, 6, 8, 14–17], but discontinuous control law will be established by adopting this scheme. In [18], a soft compensation scheme to avoid the discontinuity is proposed, but an error will be introduced in compensation process. In [19], a smooth inverse dead-zone approach is adopted in adaptive control for nonlinear systems. An adaptive fuzzy sliding mode controller is developed for an electrohydraulic system subject to an unknown dead-zone input [20, 21]. In this work, a compact double-direction compensation approach is developed for the unknown dead-zone of the hydraulic proportional valve, which avoids redundant and frequent reverse actions of the valve which lead to vibration and instability. Moreover, lower computation cost is required for implementation.

2. Electrohydraulic Control System

In this work, electrohydraulic proportional control system for each joint works according to the proportional flow rate regulation principle, in which the flow rate through proportional valve is controlled by appropriate control signal setting. The electrohydraulic control system is divided into six identical groups. Figure 1 shows the control principle of one joint including the so-called load-independent valve, which indicates that the output flow rate has no relation to external load but is just proportional to spool displacement. In this figure, and are the incoming flow rate within each chamber, and are the pressures inside the two chambers of the cylinder, and are the effective areas of the two chambers and , is the total mass of piston and load referred to piston, is the piston displacement, is the measured joint angle, and is the external force.

Figure 1: Electrohydraulic control principle.

Neglecting external leakage and deformation of the fluid inside the chamber, the flow rate continuity equation can be derived as

in which is the internal leakage coefficient.

The balance of forces on the piston leads to the equation of motion when the piston extends:

in which is the combined viscous coefficient.

Defining the pressure drop across the load as and neglecting the relatively small friction force, (2) can be rewritten as

The continuity flow rate equations of the two orifices inside the proportional valve can be expressed, respectively:

in which is the discharge coefficient, is the valve orifice area gradient, is the effective displacement of the spool without taking the dead-zone nonlinearity into account, is the supply pressure of pump, and is the density of hydraulic oil.

Considering that the internal leakage is much less compared with the input or output flow rate of the chamber, it can be approximately deduced that

Therefore, and are solved according to (5) and the definition of :

Defining , according to the characteristic of load-independent valve it can be deduced that is a constant, and has been determined by maker. Since the dynamics of the valve are fast enough, the spool of proportional valve can be approximately expressed as follows:

in which represents the effective control signal and is the amplification gain. Combining (1), (3), (4), (6), and (7) together and taking the definition of into account, can be expressed as

in which .

3. Design of Control System

Figure 2 shows the control block diagram of joint motion control. In this work, the feed-forward control term shown in this figure is applied to reduce the steady state error, and control signal corresponding to the desired joint trajectory can be calculated according to (8), in which the piston displacement is uniquely determined according to (9) which has already been given in [13]

in which and represent the length between the joint and two endpoints of the cylinder, respectively.

Figure 2: Block diagram of joint motion control.

3.1. HSIC Controller

In view of strong nonlinearities and parametric uncertainties, an HSIC controller is formulated and implemented for joint motion control. The basic idea of HSIC is to imitate people’s behavior and is composed of three levels including direct control level, parameter correction level, and task adjustment level. In this work, the first two levels are adopted. The direct control level is to determine the appropriate control mode according to the dynamic characteristics, and the parameter correction level is to adaptively adjust the control parameters by imitating the expert’s experience. represents the error between the desired angle and the actual angle . Figure 3 shows the characteristic models based on the error state, and special dynamic behavior shown in the box corresponds to a quadrant. In the figure, , , and are the threshold values of error, and and are the threshold values of the derivation of error. The details are illustrated in the following.

Figure 3: Characteristic models based on the error state.

3.1.1. Direct Control Level

Characteristic models are constructed in direction control level according to the error state:

in which : and ; : without including ; : ; : . Function means the absolute value of the variable in bracket.

Correspondingly, the control modes in direction control level are set as

in which is zero output mode; is derivation control mode; is proportional plus derivation control mode; maintains output mode.

Production system is applied to describe the structure of each level in HSIC controller. The reference rules in direction control level are expressed as

in which : IF , THEN ; : IF , THEN ; : IF , THEN ; : IF , THEN .

3.1.2. Parameter Correction Level

In this level, the characteristic models are chosen as follows:

in which : and ; : and ; : and ; : and ; : and ; : and .

According to the control modes aforementioned, parametric correction law is mainly designed for proportional coefficient and differential coefficient , and it is given more carefully in the following:

in which : , : , : , : , : , : , : , and : . Coefficients , , , , , , , , , , , , and are all positive constants.

The corresponding reference rules about parametric correction are given as

in which : IF or , THEN and ; : IF and ( or ), THEN and ; : IF and , THEN and ; : IF and ( or ), THEN and ; : IF and , THEN and ; : IF and ( or ), THEN and ; : IF and , THEN and ; : IF and , THEN and ; : IF and , THEN and ; : IF and , THEN and .

3.2. Dead-Zone Compensation

Figure 4 shows the nonsymmetric dead-zone nonlinearity of the proportional valve, in which represents the actual control signal outputting to the valve, and represent the slopes, and and represent the breakpoint values.

Figure 4: Characteristic of nonsymmetric dead-zone.

According to (7), the mathematic model of dead-zone can be expressed as

in which represents the sum of control signals generated by feed-forward controller and HSIC controller, respectively.

Actually, the accurate breakpoints cannot be acquired in time by the adopted algorithms including fuzzy logic, neural network, and adaptive control because of the parametric uncertainty and external environment. Assume that the ranges of and are known: and . To offset the deleterious effect of the dead-zone nonlinearity in closed-loop control, a direct dead-zone inverse compensation approach shown in Figure 5 is generally adopted when rigor control performance is not required. In this figure, and represent the estimates of and , respectively.

Figure 5: Direct dead-zone inverse compensation.

In practice, redundant and frequent reverse actions of proportional valve are inevitably introduced by adopting direct dead-zone inverse compensation scheme, which may deteriorate control performance and even lead to severe vibration. In order to offset the adverse effect, we proposed a double-direction compensation scheme shown in Figure 6. In this figure, the dead-zone compensation is composed of two parts which represent different implementation direction and are shown by dotted line and solid line, respectively, and the same compensation principle is applied in each part which is composed of three sections. In the following, the first part represented by dotted line is taken for illustration.

Figure 6: Double-direction dead-zone compensation.

In section one, when , the direct dead-zone inverse approach aforementioned is adopted for compensation.

In section two, a variable named “depth” is defined and determined according to (17). By adding the depth , the reverse action of the valve will be delayed as decreases. Quadratic function is established to describe the relationship between and in this section. In this manner, it can be guaranteed that the orifice is completely closed gradually before reverse action is implemented, so that vibration can hardly be excited:

In section three, reverse action is implemented at first. Then, a quick compensation mode is implemented to avoid introducing or enlarging the system error, in which the integral function with respect to is applied to track the trajectory of direct dead-zone inverse approach quickly but without introducing discontinuity.

According to the description above, the mathematical expression of this part is given as follows:

in which .

In the second part, another depth can be determined according to

The mathematical expression of the dead-zone compensation for the second part can also be given in the same way:

in which .

4. Control Results and Discussion

To evaluate control performances of proposed control schemes, joint motion control is implemented on a real 52-meter-long five-boom system shown in Figure 7. The proposed control schemes are implemented on the original 16-bit controller without assistance from any other equipment in real time. Joint angle is measured by means of two space angle sensors mounted on the neighboring booms, respectively, and the measured angles are stored in a PC via a CAN-bus recorder. The sampling period is set to 20 ms in practice.

Figure 7: The experimental setup.

Sinusoid expressed as (21) is taken as the target trajectory for evaluation, and two sinusoidal motions with different period are implemented in experiments. Moreover, conventional PID control is also adopted for comparison, which is widely used in industrial process for its satisfactory performance and simple structure, and its control coefficients are optimized by using the standard Ziegler-Nichols closed-loop tuning approach. And the proposed double-direction dead-zone compensation scheme is applied to deal with dead-zone nonlinearity of proportional valve. We take the first joint for illustration, the results of which are shown in Figure 8. According to Figure 8(a), the error obtained by HSIC controller is almost within ±0.15 degrees, and its maximum is reduced to 43% of the maximum error obtained by PID control. In Figure 8(b), the maximum error obtained by HSIC controller is also reduced to 52% compared with PID control. These results indicate that, by modifying control action to adapt to the dynamic behavior of the boom system, the joint control accuracy can be improved, so that HSIC is verified to be effective for joint motion control of such a large-sized boom system. Because of the advantage of the openness of HSIC, more excellent control schemes or correction strategies can be included in HSIC to modify control action further:

(a)

(b)

Figure 8: Experimental results of the sinusoidal trajectory. (a)  s and (b)  s.

Figure 9 shows control signal and corresponding actual control output obtained by double-direction dead-zone compensation module. According to this figure, dead-zone nonlinearity is offset in the moment of reverse action, and frequent reverse actions of the valve in regions indicated by the red boxes are obviously avoided, which will be introduced by adopting direct dead-zone inverse compensation and lead to vibration and instability. Therefore, it is stated that double-direct dead-zone compensation not only overcomes the negative effect of dead-zone nonlinearity but also improves the capacity of resisting disturbance and stability of the control system without introducing redundant reverse actions, so that this scheme is suitable for dead-zone compensation of proportional valve. And the compensation performance lies on the parameters and . If they are set too large, the control accuracy may be compromised, and the capacity of resisting disturbance will be reduced if the smaller values are determined. So these parameters need to be determined according to characteristics of the control object and control requirements established.

Figure 9: Effect of the double-direct dead-zone compensation.

5. Conclusions

In this work, the joint motion control of a 52-meter-long five-boom system is studied, which is the basis of achieving automation of the boom system. Because of the strong nonlinearities and parametric uncertainties, it becomes more difficult. Feed-forward control is adopted to reduce the steady state error. A human simulated intelligent controller is developed to improve the adaptive ability of the system by modifying control mode and parameters. For the dead-zone nonlinearity of proportional valve, a double-direction dead-zone compensation scheme is proposed to avoid vibration and instability caused by frequent reverse actions of the valve. Experiments are implemented on a real boom system to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed control schemes. Tracking results indicate that HSIC can improve control accuracy, and the effective reverse actions are guaranteed by proposed compensation scheme without introducing redundant and frequent ones, so that the capacity of resisting disturbance of the control system is also improved.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgment

This work is supported by Jiangsu Xuzhou Construction Machinery Research Institute in China.

References

H. Araya and M. Kagoshima, “Semi-automatic control system for hydraulic shovel,” Automation in construction, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 477–486, 2001.

S. Zhou and S. Zhang, “Co-simulation on automatic pouring of truck mounted concrete boom pump,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Automation and Logistics (ICAL '07), pp. 928–932, IEEE, Jinan, China, August 2007.

J. Činkelj, R. Kamnik, P. Čepon, M. Mihelj, and M. Munih, “Closed-loop control of hydraulic telescopic handler,” Automation in Construction, vol. 19, no. 7, pp. 954–963, 2010.

F. Bu and B. Yao, “Nonlinear model based coordinated adaptive robust control of electro-hydraulic robotic manipulators: Methods and comparative studies,” in Proceedings of the ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, pp. 1603–1611, ASME, New York, NY, USA, November 2001.

M. A. B. Cunha and R. Guenther, “Adaptive cascade control of a hydraulic actuator with an adaptive dead-zone compensation,” in Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Mechanical Engineering, pp. 385–392, Ouro Preto, Brazil, November 2005.

L. D. S. Coelho and M. A. B. Cunha, “Adaptive cascade control of a hydraulic actuator with an adaptive dead-zone compensation and optimization based on evolutionary algorithms,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 38, no. 10, pp. 12262–12269, 2011.

P. H. Chang and S.-J. Lee, “A straight-line motion tracking control of hydraulic excavator system,” Mechatronics, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 119–138, 2002.

F. Bu and B. Yao, “Nonlinear adaptive robust control of hydraulic actuators regulated by proportional directional control valves with deadband and nonlinear flow gains,” in Proceedings of the American Control Conference, pp. 4129–4133, Chicaga, Ill, USA, June 2000.

P. R. Ouyang, W. J. Zhang, and M. M. Gupta, “An adaptive switching learning control method for trajectory tracking of robot manipulators,” Mechatronics, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 51–61, 2006.

X. Sun, H. Ye, and S. Fei, “A closed-loop detection and open-loop control strategy for booms of truck-mounted concrete pump,” Automation in Construction, vol. 31, pp. 265–273, 2013.

Z. Li, Y. Wang, Z. Tan, H. Zhang, and Y. Wen, “Swinging-up and handstand-control of cart-double-pendulum system and experiment analysis,” in Proceedings of the 5th World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation, pp. 2360–2364, Hangzhou, China, June 2004.

Z. Li and D. Liang, “Human simulated intelligent controller with fuzzy online self-tuning of parameters and its application to a cart-double pendulum,” Journal of Computers, vol. 3, no. 9, pp. 67–76, 2008.

M. Yu, X. M. Dong, S. B. Choi, and C. R. Liao, “Human simulated intelligent control of vehicle suspension system with MR dampers,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, vol. 319, no. 3–5, pp. 753–767, 2009.

J.-Z. Kim, J.-H. Park, S.-W. Lee, and E. K. P. Chong, “Two-layered fuzzy logic controller for systems with deadzones,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 155–162, 1994.

S.-Y. Oh and D.-J. Park, “Design of new adaptive fuzzy logic controller for nonlinear plants with unknown or time-varying dead zones,” IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 482–491, 1998.

R. R. Selmic and F. L. Lewis, “Deadzone compensation in motion control systems using neural networks,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 602–613, 2000.

F. L. Lewis, W. K. Tim, L.-Z. Wang, and Z. X. Li, “Deadzone compensation in motion control systems using adaptive fuzzy logic control,” IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 731–742, 1999.

G. Tao and P. V. Kokotovic, “Adaptive control of plants with unknown dead-zones,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 59–68, 1994.

J. Zhou, C. Wen, and Y. Zhang, “Adaptive output control of nonlinear systems with uncertain dead-zone nonlinearity,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 504–511, 2006.

W. M. Bessa, M. S. Dutra, and E. Kreuzer, “Sliding mode control with adaptive fuzzy dead-zone compensation of an electro-hydraulic servo-system,” Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems: Theory and Applications, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 3–16, 2010.

W. M. Bessa, A. S. de Paula, and M. A. Savi, “Sliding mode control with adaptive fuzzy dead-zone compensation for uncertain chaotic systems,” Nonlinear Dynamics, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 1989–2001, 2012.