Production and Characterization of Bricks from Bottom Ash and Textile Sludge Using Plastic Waste as Binding Agent

,


Introduction
Te global urbanization trend and changes in lifestyle have resulted in a signifcant increase in solid waste generation.Unfortunately, a substantial portion of this waste is not properly recycled, leading to extensive dumping and inadequate waste management practices [1].Sub-Saharan African countries, in particular, face signifcant challenges in waste management due to inadequate storage and collection systems, as well as a lack of disposal facilities, resulting in open dumping [2].Insufcient data on waste disposal exacerbate the situation, suggesting that the actual volume of waste disposed through open dumping is even higher [3].Ethiopia, for example, struggles with poor solid waste management practices [4].
Conventional waste disposal methods, such as landflling, have several disadvantages, including high transportation costs, difculty in fnding suitable landfll sites, leaching of heavy metals into the soil, and the release of harmful gases [5].Improper waste dumping near water bodies also leads to surface water pollution as toxic substances leach into the water during rainfall [6].Terefore, there is an urgent need to fnd environmentally friendly alternatives for solid waste management.
One promising approach is the utilization of municipal solid waste incinerated bottom ash (MSWIBA) and textile sludge in the brick-making industry.MSWIBA refers to the residue remaining after waste combustion in power plants, boilers, furnaces, or incinerators.Te brick-making industry has shown compatibility with various waste materials, as they can be incorporated into brick production [7].Textile sludge, containing signifcant mineral compositions similar to cement, contributes to environmental pollution due to its high concentration of toxic heavy metals [8].
By incorporating these waste materials into brick production, it is possible to create a safe, inert, and useful medium that diverts solid waste from landflls [9,10].Tis approach ofers a cost-efective building design solution while addressing the pollution concerns associated with waste disposal [11].Previous research has explored the utilization of various waste materials as partial substitutes for traditional building materials, resulting in reduced raw material requirements and lower fring temperatures for bricks [12].Furthermore, incorporating waste materials as binders in brick production has shown the potential to enhance the strength and durability of fred bricks without compromising quality [13].
Tis study focuses on the utilization of municipal waste incinerated bottom ash and textile sludge as key components in brick production.Diferent proportions of these waste materials, along with melted waste plastic as a cement substitute, were used to develop brick specimens.Te study specifcally targets the municipal solid waste generated from the Reppie waste-to-energy power plant, where wellmanaged disposal landflls are lacking, resulting in the disposal of byproducts in open landflls.Substituting conventional brick production raw materials with these waste materials presents a signifcant opportunity to protect natural resources and the environment from the adverse impacts of waste disposal.
In conclusion, this study aims to investigate the potential of utilizing municipal waste incinerated bottom ash and textile sludge in brick production as a sustainable solution to solid waste management.By incorporating these waste materials into brick production, not only can the challenges of waste disposal be addressed but also the waste can be transformed into valuable construction products.Trough the adoption of environmentally friendly practices, a more sustainable approach to waste management can be established, promoting the conservation of natural resources for future generations.

Sample Preparation and Characterization
2.1.1.Sample Collection and Preparation.Te MSWIBA sample was randomly collected from the Reppie waste-toenergy power plant in Addis Ababa, where approximately 1,400 tons are produced daily.Te TS sample was obtained from Kanoria Africa Textile Plc.located near the Addis Ababa-Adama expressway.Te low-density polyethylene (LDPE) waste plastic sample was sourced from local markets and households, considering the absence of a separate collection system.LDPE is one type of thermoplastics that have either linear or branched structures and can be amorphous or semicrystalline materials.Tese plastics can be remolded, reshaped, and reused.To do the study, segregation and sorting were necessary due to the mixed nature of household waste plastic.
Te collected MSWIBA and TS samples were air-dried for one week to eliminate excess moisture.Subsequently, they were milled to reduce the particle size, ensuring uniformity for brick production.Te LDPE waste plastic samples underwent a treatment process involving washing, sun-drying, and chopping into small pieces, facilitating the melting process as shown in Figure 1.
After the sample preparation steps, the dried MSWIBA, TS, and waste plastic samples were ready for mixing.Various proportions were determined based on the desired composition, bearing in mind the objective of the research to study the properties of produced bricks.

Characterization of Municipal Solid Waste, Incinerated
Bottom Ash, and Textile Sludge.Tis subsection describes the characterization methods employed, such as pH determination ASTM-D4972-01 [14], loss of ignition (ASTM-D7348-13) [15]; sieve analysis, X-ray difraction (XRD) for heavy metal detection, density determination GB/T 208-201 [16] and specifc gravity Xade specifc gravity of textile sludge (TS) was determined using the ASTM C128 [17] standard method, which involves the SSD (Saturated Surface Dry) method.In this method, the mass of a given volume of the sample is compared to the mass of an equal volume of water at 4 °C.
Tis study provides a concise and comprehensive overview of the sample preparation methodology for alternative brick production using MSWIBA, TS, and waste plastic, and the proximate results of the raw materials are shown in Table 1.

Preparation of Brick and Characterization.
In this study, the utilization of municipal waste, incinerated bottom ash, textile sludge, and plastic waste as substitutes for traditional bricks was investigated.Te textile sludge and municipal waste incinerated bottom ash samples were dewatered and subjected to open-air drying until their weight reached a constant value.Subsequently, the textile sludge and bottom ash samples retained on the 4.75 sieve were crushed using a 1 mm crusher to attain uniform particle sizes.
Te dried textile sludge and bottom ash were then added in predetermined ratios as shown in Table 2 (1 : 1 : 1, 2 : 1 : 1, 1 : 2 : 1, 1 : 1 : 2, and 1 : 2 : 2) along with the melted plastic waste.Te plastic waste was melted on a plate until it transformed into a liquid state.Te dried textile sludge and bottom ash were then added in accordance with the desired proportion, and the mixture was thoroughly hand-mixed for a duration of 5 to 8 minutes.
Following the mixing process, the mixture was placed into molds and allowed to dry, thereby forming bricks for further testing.Various tests were conducted on each combination of bricks, including compressive strength, water absorption, and eforescence assessment.
Overall, this study examined the preparation methodology and evaluated the properties of bricks made from a combination of municipal waste, incinerated bottom ash, textile sludge, and plastic waste.Te output of the mix design (the produced bricks) are shown in be Figure 2 below.

Water Absorption.
Te water absorption of the brick samples was determined by oven-drying them at 105 °C for 24 hours.After cooling to room temperature, the bricks were submerged in distilled water at 27 °C for 24 hours.Surface water was wiped of, and the weight of each brick was measured within 5 minutes of removal from the water bath.Te water absorption was calculated based on the weight diference before and after the submersion process [18].
where W s = wet weight of the sample and Wd = dry weight of the sample.Compressive � maximum load applied(KN) initial cross sectinal area(mm2) .

Flexural Strength Test.
Te fexural strengths of 40 × 40 × 160 mm mortar specimens were determined using the ASTM C78/C78M test method.Tree specimens were cast from the same mortar batch, cured, and placed on support blocks of a four-point loading device with a 120 mm distance between the outer loading points.Te load was applied at a constant rate to the center of each specimen until failure, recording the maximum load and corresponding defection.Flexural strength was calculated for each specimen, and the average strength of the three specimens was reported (ASTM C78/C78M).
Waste Plastic MSWIBA Textile Sludge Crushed Plastic Crushed botttom ash Crushed tetile sludge  where P is the maximum load, L is the span length between support points, b is the width of the specimen, and d is the depth of the mortar.

Leachability Test of Bricks.
Te leaching of toxic heavy metals from textile sludge-based bricks was investigated.Te bricks were immersed in water for a specifc duration, and the resulting leachate was analyzed using the FAAS analysis method to determine heavy metal concentrations.Te leaching process involved the dissolution of soluble constituents from the bricks into the contact water phase.
Assessing the concentration of leached heavy was crucial for evaluating the potential environmental impact.Te FAAS analysis method was employed to precisely quantify the heavy metal concentrations in the leachate.

Eforesce Test.
Te presence of alkalis in bricks, which can be harmful, was detected.Alkalis often result in the formation of grey or white patches on the brick surface.A fat-bottom container with sufcient distilled water was utilized.Te brick was immersed in distilled water, with an immersion depth of 25 mm, and left for a day.To prevent excessive evaporation, the container was covered with a plastic sheet.Subsequently, the brick was removed from the container and allowed to dry for the same duration, corresponding to the amount of water that evaporated from an open container without the brick or the sheet, following the standard guidelines of 3495, 2002 (part: 2)

Water absorption.
Te water absorption percentages of diferent brick ratios were determined and higher percentages of textile sludge and bottom ash resulted in increased water absorption.As illustrated in Figure 3, sample 5 with a ratio of 1 : 2 : 2 of plastic, bottom ash, and textile sludge exhibited the highest water absorption percentage of 3.4%.However, even with this higher percentage, the material still outperforms conventional bricks, which typically have around 20% water absorption.Te plastic bottom ash and textile sludge mixture demonstrated signifcantly lower water absorption, making it a desirable construction material.Previous studies by Priyadharshini [19] and Kasaw et al. [20] also observed increased water absorption with higher percentages of textile sludge.Additionally, the authors of [21] found that as the plastic percentage increased, water absorption decreased.

Compressive Strength of Brick.
Te compressive strength of the plastic bottom ash and textile sludge mixtures was found to be comparable to that of conventional bricks, which typically have a compressive strength ranging from 7 to 21 MPa.Increasing the proportion of bottom ash generally improved the compressive strength, while reducing the proportions of plastic and textile sludge.Sample 3 with a ratio of 1 : 2 : 1 exhibited the highest compressive strength of 16.4 MPa, followed by sample 2 with a ratio of 2 : 1 : 1 at 12.96 MPa.Sample 5, with the highest percentage of textile sludge and plastic and the lowest percentage of bottom ash, had a lower compressive strength of 8.527 MPa (Figure 4).It should be noted that specifc compressive strength values may vary across studies due to diferent testing methodologies and materials used in the research.For instance, the authors of [22] reported compressive strength values for textile sludge-incorporated bricks ranging from 2.73 to 30.43 MPa, with a decrease in strength  as the percentage of textile sludge increased.Similarly, the authors of [20] found that the compressive strength of incinerated textile sludge bricks decreased with higher percentages of incinerated textile sludge.Te authors of [19] observed a decrease in compressive strength with increasing textile sludge percentage in burnt bricks.

Flexural Strength Test.
Te fexural strength of the mortar specimens (40 × 40 × 160 mm) was determined using the ASTM C78/C78M test method.Tree rectangular beam specimens were cast from each mortar mixture.Te fexural strength varied depending on the percentage of plastic, bottom ash, and textile sludge used in each mixture.Specimen 3, with a ratio of 1 : 2 : 1, exhibited the highest average fexural strength of 8.9374 N/mm 2 (Figure 5).Specimen 2, with a ratio of 2 : 1 : 1, showed a relatively high average fexural strength of 8.40622 N/mm 2 .Conversely, specimen 5, with a ratio of 1 : 2 : 2, had the lowest average fexural strength of 3.983 N/mm 2 .Specimen 1 (ratio 1 : 1 : 1) and specimen 4 (ratio 1 : 1 : 2) had similar average fexural strengths of 5.132475 N/mm 2 and 7.3155 N/mm 2 , respectively.Figure 5 presents the details of the results of the fexural strength test.In summary, the fexural strength of the mortar was signifcantly infuenced by the ingredient ratios.Higher percentages of bottom ash contributed to increased fexural strength, while higher percentages of textile sludge resulted in decreased fexural strength.

XRD Raw Material Heavy Metal Content Result.
Table 3 shows that the concentrations of heavy metals in both sludge and bottom ash samples are signifcantly higher than the permissible limits set by WHO, indicating potential environmental and health hazards.Te toxic heavy metals obtained in the order of highest to lowest concentration are Fe, Zn, Pb, Cd, and Cr, and the concentrations of Fe and Zn in both sludge and bottom ash are high.Among the toxic heavy metals, chromium and cadmium are of particular concern due to their known toxicity and potential for bioaccumulation in the food chain.Te high concentration of chromium in the sludge sample is alarming, as it is a known carcinogen and poses signifcant health risks to humans and wildlife.4 provides information on the heavy metal content (in ppm) in diferent mixtures of plastic, bottom ash, and sludge and compares them with the regulatory limits set by the USEPA for these metals.

Leachability Analysis. Table
Te leachability test was conducted on two samples, one with a high amount of textile sludge and the other with a low amount of textile sludge.Tis specifc selection was made due to the high concentration of heavy metals present in textile sludge.By testing samples with both high and low concentrations, we can make generalizations about the leaching behavior of heavy metals.It observed that the heavy metal concentrations in most of the sample elements are below the regulatory limits set by the USEPA.For example, the concentrations of chromium, cadmium, and zinc in all samples are below the regulatory limits, which indicate that these metals are not a signifcant concern in the mixtures.Te lead concentration in sample 2 (2 : 1 : 1) is slightly above the regulatory limit, but it is within acceptable limits.On the other hand, the iron concentration in all samples is higher than the regulatory limit, but this is not a concern as iron is not considered a toxic heavy metal and is commonly found in soil and rocks.Similarly, the amount of these toxic heavy metals decreased signifcantly, as observed by Basheh et al. [22] and Zhan et al. [23] Kassaw [20].As illustrated in Figure 6, FAAS analysis method was employed to precisely quantify the heavy metal concentrations in the leachate.Considering eforescence in construction can have several potential implications because it can signifcantly afect the aesthetics of construction materials and surfaces.Te white, powdery deposits can make walls, bricks, concrete, or other masonry look unsightly and dirty, and also, it can afect the structural integrity even if eforescence by itself does not directly impact the structural integrity of construction materials, and it can be an indication of underlying moisture-related issues.
Te presence of eforescence suggests the migration of water and salts through the material.Over time, repeated cycles of moisture absorption and drying can potentially lead to damage, such as cracking, or deterioration of the material, which can compromise its structural stability, and it has the ability to afect the durability in long term through salts that accumulate on the surface can absorb moisture, and when this moisture evaporates, it can leave behind salt crystals.Te growth and contraction of these crystals can cause microcracks within the material, making it more susceptible to water penetration, freeze-thaw damage, and other environmental stresses.Over time, this can accelerate the aging and deterioration of the material, reducing its lifespan.So, using low eforescence material during construction can eliminate those problems.

Conclusion
In conclusion, the bricks produced from the mixture of raw materials had acceptable compressive strength, eforescence, and hardness, indicating that they could be used for construction purposes.It is a promising solution for solid waste management and environmental conservation.Te study showed that the bricks produced from the mixture of raw materials had acceptable physical and chemical properties, and their potential use as an alternative material for the production of brick blocks was demonstrated.Te use of these bricks can help reduce the environmental impact of waste disposal and contribute to sustainable development.Further research will be needed to assess the major properties and performance of bricks for long-term impact and investigate the suitable technologies that make the brickmaking process easiest and optimize the composition and ratios of the raw materials, including plastic waste, municipal solid waste incinerated bottom ash (MSWIBA), and textile sludge (TS).
Test.Te sample of produced brick was placed in the compression strength testing machine.After placing it, the load was applied to the brick without any shock.Te load was increased at a rate of 140 kg/ cm 2 per minute continuously until the specimen's resistance to the increasing load broke down, following the guidelines of the Indian Standard 3495: 2002 (method of testing of burnt clay building brick) published by the Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.Te equation (2) used to conduct the compressive test.

3. 6 .
Eforescence Test.During the eforescence test observation, slight eforescence was observed in the plastic sand brick with a ratio of 1 : 1 : 2 for plastic, bottom ash, and textile sludge.Tis minimal eforescence can be attributed to the lower presence of soluble salts in the plastic component.Te results demonstrate a signifcant reduction in eforescence for the plastic brick, indicating compliance with the Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, 2002.

Table 1 :
Proximate analysis of MSWIBA and TS.

Table 2 :
Mix design and setup.
Figure 2: Image of produced brick.