Journal of Environmental and Public Health
Volume 2017 (2017), Article ID 2517207, 7 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/2517207

Research Article

Epidemic of Vitamin D Deficiency and Its Management: Awareness among Indian Medical Undergraduates

Yangshen Lhamo,¹ Preeta Kaur Chugh,² Sandhya R. Gautam,² and C. D. Tripathi²

¹Department of Pharmacology, North DMC Medical College & Hindu Rao Hospital, New Delhi, India
²Department of Pharmacology, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College & Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India

Correspondence should be addressed to Preeta Kaur Chugh; docpreeta@yahoo.com

Received 27 December 2016; Accepted 28 March 2017; Published 3 April 2017

Academic Editor: Sina Dobaradaran

Copyright © 2017 Yangshen Lhamo et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

Vitamin D deficiency is prevalent across all age groups in epidemic proportions. The purpose of this study was to acquire a baseline assessment and create awareness among medical students regarding vitamin D. A cross-sectional, voluntary survey was conducted among undergraduate medical students. Data were collected using a questionnaire which assessed the level of knowledge students had with regard to where vitamin D comes from, what it does for health, how much is recommended, factors that affect its levels, and deficiency management. Majority of students were unaware that vitamin D deficiency has attained epidemic proportions. Though bone and skeletal disorders as a complication of vitamin D deficiency were known, a large number were unaware of systemic consequences (diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular diseases, and cancers). Only one-third of respondents were aware of duration and timing of sun exposure required for adequate serum vitamin D levels. However, we observed lack of awareness among students regarding the various biochemical forms, dose, and duration of vitamin D supplementation for treatment of nutritional deficiency. Our study highlighted a lack of knowledge about the importance of vitamin D, worldwide prevalence of vitamin D deficiency, and its management among medical students. Promoting vitamin D health awareness, if replicated across populations, could lead to positive health outcomes globally.

1. Introduction

Vitamin D deficiency is a worldwide epidemic and yet, it is a problem that is largely unknown by majority of population [1]. Widespread prevalence in all age groups including toddlers, school children, men, women, elderly, pregnant women, and their neonates in both rural and urban areas has been documented [2]. Young adults are also potentially at high-risk for vitamin D deficiency. During childhood, this deficiency can cause growth retardation and skeletal deformities, while in adults, muscle weakness and fractures may ensue [3, 4]. In addition to its importance for bone health, recent evidence suggests that vitamin D is also useful in promoting cardiovascular health and preventing chronic diseases (diabetes mellitus, autoimmune disorders, and various cancers) [5, 6].

One of the major reasons for the worldwide spread of this nutritional disorder has been lack of awareness about the importance of vitamin D, its health benefits, and prevention of deficient states across populations [7–9]. It has been suggested that awareness and educational campaigns about vitamin D at the community level targeting both general and high-risk populations could help prevent long-term health consequences [10]. Primary education targeting younger populations is known to increase the likelihood of positive health behaviour that persists throughout and protect from disease development and progression later in life [11, 12]. Apart from targeting young adults at the community level, young medical students also need to be a focus for group interventions, as staggeringly low rates of awareness have been reported among them [13]. Selection of young medical students in this study provides a twofold opportunity of targeting a section of the general population that would also be future health providers of the community. Medical students are an integral part of future health-related progress of the community at large and should therefore be the target for inducing such long-term changes [12]. This next generation of professionals could influence the progression of future health education programs, policy development, and formation of social norms and beliefs about health and health promoting behaviours [14]. It is crucial to have a thorough understanding of student’s motivation, knowledge, and attitudes towards a health behaviour before being able to create effective and targeted health promotion programs [15, 16]. Gaining a baseline understanding of medical students’ current vitamin D related knowledge may be first step in programme development and is the purpose of this study. The findings from this assessment will provide important information to determine what next steps will be necessary to promote sufficient levels of vitamin D among medical students and health professionals. Thus, this study is an attempt for sensitization of medical undergraduates early in their training regarding vitamin D and prevention and treatment of its deficiency.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design and Settings

Our study was conducted among the MBBS undergraduate students about one and half year after enrolment in medical school, at the Department of Pharmacology, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College (VMMC) and associated Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India. This research was conducted as a cross-sectional, voluntary survey over a period of one and a half year. The study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India.

2.2. Data Collection and Questionnaire

The questionnaire was given to 300 undergraduate medical students. Before filling the questionnaire, necessary information was given by the researchers. The participants were allowed to get their doubts cleared. Data were collected using a questionnaire composed of two parts. First part included questions on age and gender and second half focused on vitamin D. The main objective of the study was to assess vitamin D knowledge among medical students. The 16-question, predominantly multiple-choice survey took approximately 15 minutes or less to complete. The survey questions assessed the level of knowledge students had with regard to where vitamin D comes from, what it does for health, how much is recommended, factors that affect vitamin D levels, and the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency. In our study, apart from questions on vitamin D deficiency and its management, two questions focused on sun exposure (duration and timing) in New Delhi, India, wherein the study was conducted (Table 1).

Table 1: Vitamin D: percentage of student’s response awareness of vitamin D.

Question
(%)

Status of vitamin D deficiency in India

    Only in high risk groups
60 (23.8)

    Urban population
119 (47.2)

    Epidemic proportions
45 (17.8)

    Rare
21 (8.3)

High risk groups for vitamin D deficiency

    Infants, pregnant, and lactating women
192 (76.1)

    Elderly
15 (5.9)

    Patients with diabetes mellitus
6 (2.3)

    People with naturally fair skin
23 (9.1)

    None of the above
16 (6.3)

Problems associated with vitamin D deficiency

    Bone and skeletal disorders
238 (94.4)

    Diabetes mellitus
2 (0.7)

    Cardiovascular disease
1 (0.3)

    Cancer
1 (1.1)

    Autoimmune disorders
4 (1.5)

    None of the above
2 (0.7)

Sources of vitamin D

    Green leafy vegetables
43 (17.0)

    Sunlight that passed through glass
83 (48.0)

    Milk
57 (22.6)

    Egg yolk
21 (8.3)

    None of the above
10 (3.9)

Adequate sun exposure to achieve sufficient vitamin D levels in New Delhi

    Sun exposure (10 am–2 pm) on exposed arms and legs
107 (42.4)

    Sunlight passed through glass (10 am–2 pm) on exposed arms and legs
46 (18.2)

    Sunlight exposure through glass (2–4 pm) on exposed arms and legs
9 (3.5)

    Sun exposure (7 am–10 am) on exposed arms and legs
79 (31.3)

    None of the above
11 (4.3)

Minimum amount of sun exposure required for synthesis of vitamin D in New Delhi

    1 hour/day
87 (34.5)

    30 min/twice a week
81 (32.1)

    2 hours a day
51 (20.2)

    4 hour/twice a week
24 (8.7)

    None of the above
11 (4.3)

RDA of vitamin D

    600 IU
62 (24.6)

    800 IU
84 (33.3)

    1000 IU
55 (21.8)

    2000 IU
13 (5.1)

Ever taken vitamin D supplement

    No
58 (23)

    Yes, with estimation of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels
61 (24.2)

    Yes, without estimation of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels
132 (52.3)

Recommended form of vitamin D supplement for nutritional deficiency

    Alfacalcidol
19 (7.5)

    Cholecalciferol
101 (40.0)

    Calcitriol
105 (41.6)

    Either of the above
22 (8.7)

    None of the above
5 (1.9)

Active biochemical form of vitamin D

    Alfacalcidol
2 (0.7)

    Calcitriol
133 (52)

    Cholecalciferol
99 (39.2)

    Ergocalciferol
7 (2.7)

    None of the above
18 (7.1)

Vitamin D serum levels in an adult indicate

    Insufficiency at 20–29 ng/mL; deficiency ≤20 ng/mL
46 (18)

    Insufficiency at 10–19 ng/mL; deficiency ≤15 ng/mL
50 (19.8)

    Insufficiency at 20–29 ng/mL; deficiency at ≤30 ng/mL
56 (22.2)

    Insufficiency at 20–29 ng/mL; deficiency at ≤10 ng/mL
35 (13.8)

    None of the above
65 (25.7)

Dose regime of vitamin D3 recommended for treatment of vitamin D deficiency

    50,000 IU of vitamin D3 once a week for 6–8 weeks
69 (27.3)

    60,000 IU once a week for 8 weeks
29 (11.5)

    5000 IU once a week for 10 weeks
86 (34.1)

    8000 IU/day for 6 months
22 (8.7)

    None of the above
46 (18.2)

Biochemical form of vitamin D most commonly associated with hypercalcemia and hypervitaminosis

    Calcitriol
84 (33.3)

    Alfacalcidol
37 (14.6)

    Cholecalciferol
105 (41.6)

    None of the above
37 (14.6)

Are calcium supplements required for all in treatment of vitamin D deficiency

    Yes
164 (65)

    No
88 (34.9)

Validation of questionnaire to assess reproducibility and suitability was assessed using a small pretest in 10 subjects. The pretest participants were then contacted for their feedback and understanding with respect to the questionnaire. The Cronbach alpha was estimated to be 0.7, suggesting good internal consistency and an overall reliability. All student data were collected anonymously and deidentified by a member of staff not involved in the assessment of this cohort. After completion of the questionnaire, the students were taught about vitamin D, its importance, vitamin D deficiency, and its management in a lecture to create knowledge base.

2.3. Data Analysis

Statistical analysis was carried out using SPSS. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the population and to identify the frequencies of participant’s knowledge of vitamin D deficiency. A was considered significant.

3. Results

3.1. Knowledge of Importance of Vitamin D and Its Deficiency

Only 17.8% of participants correctly identified that vitamin D deficiency has achieved epidemic proportions, while less than half of the students believed that it is prevalent only in urban population (47.2%) or limited to high-risk groups (23.8%). Majority of the participants (76.1%) correctly identified infants, pregnant, and lactating women as high-risk groups. However, they were not aware (92%) that elderly and diabetics were also at a greater risk to develop vitamin D deficiency than the general population. Though bone and skeletal disorders as a complication of deficiency were known (94.4%), majority were unaware of the other systemic consequences (diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular diseases, and cancers) (Table 1).

3.2. Sources of Vitamin D

Approximately 48% of participants incorrectly identified that sunlight that passed through glass is a source of vitamin D. Milk/dairy products (22.6%) and eggs (8.33%) were recognised as vitamin D rich foods by few students. Although many were able to identify at least one correct source (30.9%), 17% of respondents also believed that green leafy vegetables are rich in vitamin D. Adequate sunlight exposure (10 am to 2 pm with arms and leg exposed), an important source of vitamin D, was recognised by 42.4% of participants. As for adequate duration of sun exposure required for vitamin D synthesis in Indian population, only one-third (32%) of respondents were aware of it.

3.3. RDA and Vitamin D Supplements

About a quarter of our study population (24.6%) was aware of the recommended daily allowance (RDA) of vitamin D (600 IU) for adult men and women. Among the undergraduate students, majority (77%) had taken vitamin D supplements at some point of their life, though only few of them (24.2%) had been diagnosed with vitamin D deficiency (estimation of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels) before administration.

3.4. Treatment of Vitamin D Deficiency

About half of the participants (52%) correctly identified calcitriol as the active form of vitamin D for biochemical functioning in the body. Cholecalciferol was thought to be the active vitamin D by 39.2% participants. More than 80% of the students were unaware of the serum levels of vitamin D indicating insufficiency/deficiency that mandates treatment. With regard to the recommended forms of vitamin D for treatment of vitamin D deficiency, a similar number of participants identified cholecalciferol (40%) and calcitriol (41.6%). Only a quarter (27.3%) of students selected correct dosage regimen (50000 IU once a week for 6–8 weeks). Many students incorrectly associated cholecalciferol (41.6%) with hypercalcemia. Also, 34.9% of the participants were aware that calcium supplementation is important in treatment of vitamin D deficiency in cases of low dietary intakes of calcium.

4. Discussion

The present study demonstrates gaps in basic knowledge about vitamin D, its benefits, and management of vitamin D deficiency among medical undergraduate students. Majority of the students believed that vitamin D deficiency is prevalent only in high-risk groups confined to urban areas. They were unaware that vitamin D deficiency has attained epidemic proportions across the world irrespective of age groups, populations, and geographical regions [2].

With regard to the importance of vitamin D, it is a key factor for maintenance of calcium and phosphate metabolism and bone homeostasis. In line with previous studies, majority of students (94%) correctly reported that vitamin D deficiency could lead to bone and skeletal disorders [13]. However, other population groups like office workers in Australia and women in China have been reported to be unaware of this fact, which could be attributed to their nonmedical background [17, 18]. Recent observational studies have found higher prevalence of cardiovascular diseases, type 2 diabetes mellitus, autoimmune disorders, cancer, mental disorders, and infectious diseases in vitamin D deficient states [1, 19]. However, our participants were not cognizant of these systemic associations of long-term vitamin D deficient state as reported previously in literature [20–22].

Apart from adequate sun exposure, fortified milk and other food products (salmon, cod liver oil, sundried mushrooms, and egg yolk) are rich in vitamin D. We observed that students need to have knowledge about natural, dietary, and fortified sources and that these dietary sources alone are insufficient in treatment of deficient states. In our population, as in previous studies [13, 20–23], knowledge regarding vitamin D dietary sources was insufficient. Vitamin D deficiency may be overlooked in Asian countries including India, perhaps on the assumption that vitamin D deficiency is unlikely to occur in regions that receive ample sunshine throughout the year [24–26]. Sun exposure is one of the best natural sources for prevention and treatment of vitamin D deficiency. Various sociocultural and dietary factors, limited outdoor activity due to urbanization, air pollutants, and negative attitudes towards sunlight with extensive use of sunscreens for “fairer” skin all attribute to high prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in our country [19, 20, 25–27]. In addition, it is known that sunlight that passes through glass is not suitable to build vitamin D levels [24]. Unfortunately, most medical students were unaware of this important fact. In addition, adequate sun exposure varies according to time of the day and latitude and duration of exposure in different parts of the world. In New Delhi, India, where the study was conducted, it is recommended that exposure of arms and legs to sunlight between 10 am to 2 pm for 10 min to half an hour twice a week is sufficient to achieve adequate vitamin D production in Indian skin type [24]. In line with previous studies (Vu et al.), more than 50% of our students believed that substantially greater duration of exposure (>1 to 4 hours) irrespective of the time of the day is required for vitamin D synthesis. Thus, there is a need to sensitize students to the fact that sunlight is one of the most important sources of vitamin D and stimulates the production of vitamin D3 in the skin, depending on hour of the day, duration of exposure, age, skin pigmentation, clothing style, and sunscreen use [24–26, 28, 29].

With regard to the amount of dietary intake of vitamin D, only one-third of respondents correctly identified the RDA of vitamin D. Institute of Medicine (IOM), USA, recommends RDA of 600 IU daily for adult male and females to optimise bone health. However, in absence of adequate vitamin D intake, insufficiency or deficiency may result. US Endocrine Society Classification guidelines suggest that vitamin D (25-hydroxycholecalciferol) serum levels in an adult indicate insufficiency at 20–29 ng/mL and deficiency at <20 ng/mL (Table 2). Apart from RDA for normal healthy adult, students should be made aware of how it varies according to age, sex, special states (elderly and pregnancy), and other disease conditions (renal and liver diseases). Serum vitamin D levels that indicate sufficiency and insufficiency also need to be emphasized [30, 31].

Table 2: Vitamin D status in relation to 25 (OH) levels [30, 31].

IOM (Institute of Medicine)

Severe deficiency
<5 ng/mL

Deficiency
<15 ng/mL

Sufficiency
>20 ng/mL

Risk of toxicity
>50 ng/mL

US Endocrine Society Classification

Deficiency
<20 ng/mL

Insufficiency
21–29 ng/mL

Sufficiency
>30 ng/mL

Toxicity
>150 ng/mL

(OH)D = 25-hydroxycholecalciferol.

Treatment in the right form of vitamin D supplement, adequate dose, and duration is imperative to prevent long-term health consequences of vitamin D deficiency or toxicity [30–33]. It is recommended that vitamin D (ergocalciferol or cholecalciferol) should be administered in a dose of 50,000 IU per week for 8 weeks in addition to bimonthly supplements to maintain adequate vitamin D levels [34]. It is important to understand that any dosing schedule (preferably dosing on a daily basis) should allow a stable circulating concentration of vitamin D to ensure an optimal autocrine environment for vitamin D metabolism in nonbony tissues [35]. Calcitriol (1,25-dihydroxycholecalciferol) and alfacalcidol (1 alpha hydroxycholecalciferol) are not recommended as they may be associated with hypervitaminosis and hypercalcemia; requiring monitoring of serum calcium when initiated on these supplements [30, 32, 33]. Thus, these are not recommended for treatment of nutritional deficiency [33]. However, we observed a lack of awareness among students regarding the various biochemical forms, dose, and duration of vitamin D supplementation for treatment of nutritional deficiency. It is known that prolonged self-medication with high doses of vitamin D supplements, without biochemical confirmation of deficient serum levels (estimation of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D), could pose a serious health hazard [36]. Though vitamin D toxicity is one of the rarest medical conditions, students need to be aware that adverse effects of treatment can be considerable, as nearly 52% of them had self-administered supplements without a confirmatory diagnosis of vitamin D deficiency [36].

Results of the current study are largely consistent with those conducted in other countries when it comes to identifying a knowledge deficit [13, 17, 18, 20–23]. Despite widespread attention about vitamin D deficiency, considerable gaps in knowledge of vitamin D, its sources, required intake, factors affecting levels, and associated health benefits were evident. Though students at this stage of their training understand the physiological and biochemical roles of vitamin D, its metabolism, and occurrence of deficient states in children and adults; their knowledge gap could be attributed to lack of emphasis on knowledge empowerment (educated as a part of their curriculum training on the importance of sensible sunlight exposure and dairy and nondairy products fortification) and opportunities to transfer what they have learnt to a real life practice setting. In addition, limited health awareness campaigns at the level of physicians, high-risk, and general populations [37] mandate the need for policy and public health recommendations of the government and its agencies on easily accessible reliable information for the public about vitamin D and sun exposure [20, 38, 39]. This lack of initiative is evidenced by absence of any national health policies or programmes to improve vitamin D related health (fortification of food products with vitamin D, guidelines for evaluation, treatment, and prevention of vitamin D deficiency) in our population [40]. In addition, an expert group of the Indian Government that gathered to revise and update the human nutrient requirements and the daily recommended dietary allowance for Indians concluded that outdoor physical activity is a means of not only achieving adequate vitamin D but also controlling overweight and obesity in Indian population. They felt that the recommendations (by international agencies) for obtaining vitamin D from fortification of diet and supplementation were essential only in advanced countries where exposure to sunlight is limited. Thus, only under situations of minimal exposure to sunlight, a daily supplement of 400 IU (10 μg) was recommended [26, 40].

This research evidence has reinforced the need for sensitization of medical undergraduates early in their training regarding vitamin D, its importance, and prevention and treatment of deficiency. Awareness about vitamin D at this stage of medical profession would not only benefit their own health but also instill a health-related behaviour change and increased awareness and knowledge as future medical practitioners [41]. Well-aware health professionals are more likely to be vigilant about this disorder and identify and take corrective measures at the earliest to prevent long-term health consequences in the vulnerable population. Furthermore, evidence supports the importance of physician mediated knowledge translation, as people report higher rates of intention to use vitamin D when they have been informed of the benefits via physician [42]. In addition, the findings from this assessment will provide important information to determine what next steps will be necessary to promote awareness of vitamin D among medical students. It could provide baseline data to design modules for training of medical professionals that would help them in identification, prevention, and treatment of vitamin D deficiency.

Results of this study, if extrapolated to general population, could indicate a gross lack of knowledge about this worldwide pandemic and how to prevent it at an individual level. In order to facilitate health-related behaviour change, program planners need to start with an exploration of the target population’s needs, which includes understanding of their knowledge about the specific issue of interest (i.e., vitamin D) [43]. It is unlikely that people would identify with and take corrective measures to resolve an issue they are unaware of. Thus, community levels awareness is essential to stop this silent outbreak. Future health promotion programmes with effective educational campaigns are needed to increase awareness about vitamin D so that they will inform and encourage people to adopt health-related behaviours (adequate intake) to decrease rates of insufficiency, especially in at-risk groups, thereby improving overall health [15, 16, 44].

The key strengths of this study include an important research question, the outcome of which could not only affect the study population, that is, medical students but indirectly also impact the general population/patients that they would treat as future medical practitioners. The results of this study will make an important contribution by defining and providing an evidence base for the existing knowledge deficit and instituting corrective measures at a crucial step of medical training. However, results may not be generalizable to all student populations as our sample was derived from a single superspeciality tertiary health care centre in India. The cross-sectional nature of our study limited subsequent assessment and translation of the imparted knowledge into practice. In addition, the questionnaire was primary developed for this study and was not used or validated beyond the context of the present study.

5. Conclusion

Our study highlighted a lack of awareness about the importance of vitamin D, worldwide prevalence of vitamin D deficiency, and its management among medical students. This knowledge deficit could provide baseline data to design training modules for medical professionals that would help them in identification, prevention, and treatment of vitamin D deficiency. Increased awareness at an early stage of medical training could instill adoption of health-related behaviours at personal and professional level. Effective educational campaigns targeted to specific populations would increase awareness about adequate intake of vitamin D, thereby improving overall health.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of the paper.

References

M. F. Holick and T. C. Chen, “Vitamin D deficiency: a worldwide problem with health consequences,” The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 87, pp. 1080S–1086S, 2008.

M. F. Holick, “Medical progress: vitamin D deficiency,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 357, no. 3, pp. 266–281, 2007.

J. M. Pettifor, “Vitamin D Deficiency and nutritional rickets in children in vitamin D,” in Vitamin D, D. Feldman, J. W. Pike, and F. H. Glorieux, Eds., pp. 1065–1084, Elsevier Academic Press, Boston, Mass, USA, 2nd edition, 2005.

R. K. Marwaha, N. Tandon, D. R. H. K. Reddy et al., “Vitamin D and bone mineral density status of healthy schoolchildren in northern India,” American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 82, no. 2, pp. 477–482, 2005.

R. P. Heaney, “Bone health,” The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 85, pp. 300S–333S, 2007.

M. F. Holick, “High prevalence of vitamin D inadequacy and implications for health,” Mayo Clinic Proceedings, vol. 81, no. 3, pp. 353–373, 2006.

A. Mithal, D. A. Wahl, J.-P. Bonjour et al., “Global vitamin D status and determinants of hypovitaminosis D,” Osteoporosis International, vol. 20, no. 11, pp. 1807–1820, 2009.

J. M. Pettifor, “Vitamin D &/or calcium deficiency rickets in infants & children: a global perspective,” Indian Journal of Medical Research, vol. 127, no. 3, pp. 245–249, 2008.

T. Hagenau, R. Vest, T. N. Gissel et al., “Global vitamin D levels in relation to age, gender, skin pigmentation and latitude: an ecologic meta-regression analysis,” Osteoporosis International, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 133–140, 2009.

M. I. K. von Bothmer and B. Fridlund, “Gender differences in health habits and in motivation for a healthy lifestyle among Swedish university students,” Nursing and Health Sciences, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 107–118, 2005.

E. T. Edmonds, Osteoporosis knowledge, beliefs, and behaviours of college students: utilization of the health belief model [dissertation], Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Science, vol. 70, pp. 2908, 2009.

D. Von Ah, S. Ebert, A. Ngamvitroj, N. Park, and D.-H. Kang, “Predictors of health behaviours in college students,” Journal of Advanced Nursing, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 463–474, 2004.

S. Boland, “A baseline assessment of university students' vitamin D knowledge,” Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository, Paper 1504, 2013.

A. Haase, A. Steptoe, J. F. Sallis, and J. Wardle, “Leisure-time physical activity in university students from 23 countries: associations with health beliefs, risk awareness, and national economic development,” Preventive Medicine, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 182–190, 2004.

L. W. Green and M. W. Kreuter, Health Program Planning: An Educational and Ecological Approach, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, USA, 4th edition, 2005.

J. F. McKenzie, B. L. Neiger, and R. Thackeray, Planning, Implementing and Evaluating Health Promotion Programs, Pearson Benjamin Cummings, San Francisco, Calif, USA, 5th edition, 2009.

L. H. Vu, J. C. Van der Pols, D. C. Whiteman, M. G. Kimlin, and R. E. Neale, “Knowledge and attitudes about vitamin D and impact on sun protection practices among urban office workers in Brisbane, Australia,” Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention, vol. 19, no. 7, pp. 1784–1789, 2010.

A. W. C. Kung and K.-K. Lee, “Knowledge of vitamin D and perceptions and attitudes toward sunlight among Chinese middle-aged and elderly women: a population survey in Hong Kong,” BMC Public Health, vol. 6, article 226, 2006.

E. D. Gorham, C. F. Garland, F. C. Garland et al., “Vitamin D and prevention of colorectal cancer,” Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, vol. 97, no. 1-2, pp. 179–194, 2005.

M. Deschasaux, J. C. Souberbielle, V. Partula et al., “What do people know and believe about vitamin D?” Nutrients, vol. 8, no. 11, p. 718, 2016.

S. Kotta, D. Gadhvi, N. Jakeways et al., “Test me and treat me—attitudes to vitamin D deficiency and supplementation: a qualitative study,” BMJ Open, vol. 5, no. 7, Article ID e007401, 2015.

P. H. Youl, M. Janda, and M. Kimlin, “Vitamin D and sun protection: the impact of mixed public health messages in Australia,” International Journal of Cancer, vol. 124, no. 8, pp. 1963–1970, 2009.

R. Uddin, N. H. Huda, Y. M. Jhanker, T. Jesmeen, M. Z. Imam, and S. Akter, “Awareness regarding the importance of calcium and vitamin D among the undergraduate pharmacy students in Bangladesh,” BMC Research Notes, vol. 6, no. 1, article 134, 2013.

C. V. Harinarayan, M. F. Holick, U. V. Prasad, P. S. Vani, and G. Himabindu, “Vitamin D status and sun exposure in India,” Dermato-Endocrinology, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 130–141, 2013.

G. Ritu and A. Gupta, “Vitamin D deficiency in India: prevalence, causalities and interventions,” Nutrients, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 729–775, 2014.

P. M. Srinivasan and C. V. Harinarayan, “Vitamin D deficiency in India: fortify or let the sun shine in?” Journal of Clinical and Scientific Research, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 220–226, 2015.

K. S. Agarwal, J. M. Puliyel, M. Z. Mughal, P. Upadhyay, J. L. Berry, and E. B. Mawer, “The impact of atmospheric pollution on vitamin D status of infants and toddlers in Delhi, India,” Archives of Disease in Childhood, vol. 87, no. 2, pp. 111–113, 2002.

V. Arya, R. Bhambri, M. M. Godbole, and A. Mithal, “Vitamin D status and its relationship with bone mineral density in healthy Asian Indians,” Osteoporosis International, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 56–61, 2004.

H. Nimitphong and M. F. Holick, “Vitamin D status and sun exposure in Southeast Asia,” Dermato-Endocrinology, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 34–37, 2013.

Institute of Medicine, Dietary Reference Intakes for Calcium and Vitamin D, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA, 2011.

A. C. Ross, J. E. Manson, S. A. Abrams et al., “The 2011 report on dietary reference intakes for calcium and vitamin D from the Institute of Medicine: what clinicians need to know,” Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 96, no. 1, pp. 53–58, 2011.

P. K. Chugh and Y. Lhamo, “An assessment of vitamin supplements in the indian market,” Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol. 74, no. 5, pp. 469–473, 2012.

Y. Lhamo, P. K. Chugh, and C. D. Tripathi, “Vitamin D supplements in the Indian Market,” Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol. 78, no. 1, pp. 41–47, 2016.

S. M. Pietras, B. K. Obayan, M. H. Cai, and M. F. Holick, “Vitamin D2 treatment for vitamin D deficiency and insufficiency for up to 6 years,” Archives of Internal Medicine, vol. 169, no. 19, pp. 1806–1808, 2009.

B. W. Hollis and C. L. Wagner, “The role of the parent compound vitamin d with respect to metabolism and function: why clinical dose intervals can affect clinical outcomes,” Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 98, no. 12, pp. 4619–4628, 2013.

M. F. Holick, “Vitamin d is not as toxic as was once thought: a historical and an up-to-date perspective,” Mayo Clinic Proceedings, vol. 90, no. 5, pp. 561–564, 2015.

IMA Campaigns for Vitamin D Awareness, http://www.webpressclub.org/2016/06/ima-campaigns-for-vitamin-d-awareness.html.

O. Gillie, “Sunlight robbery: a critique of public health policy on vitamin D in the UK,” Molecular Nutrition and Food Research, vol. 54, no. 8, pp. 1148–1163, 2010.

M. F. Holick, “A Vitamin D Treatment Guidelines-The Association of Physicians of India,” http://www.apiindia.org/medicine_update_2013/chap136.pdf.

Nutrient requirements and recommended dietary allowances for—ICMR, http://icmr.nic.in/final/rda-2010.pdf.

M. Nilsson, C. Ohlsson, A. Odén, D. Mellström, and M. Lorentzon, “Increased physical activity is associated with enhanced development of peak bone mass in men: a five-year longitudinal study,” Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 1206–1214, 2012.

Y. Engels, P. Van Assema, E. Dorant, and L. Lechner, “Factors associated with the intention to use vitamin D supplements: quantitative study among a sample of elderly people in a medium-sized town in the Netherlands,” Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 134–142, 2001.

C. A. Brand, H. Y. Abi, D. E. Couch, A. Vindigni, and J. D. Wark, “Vitamin D deficiency: a study of community beliefs among dark skinned and veiled people,” International Journal of Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 15–23, 2008.

A. C. Burns, “The expanded health belief model as a basis for enlightened preventive health care practice and research,” Journal of Health Care Marketing, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 32–45, 1992.