In this paper, we made improvement on the conformable fractional derivative. Compared to the original one, the improved conformable fractional derivative can be a better replacement of the classical Riemann-Liouville and Caputo fractional derivative in terms of physical meaning. We also gave the definition of the corresponding fractional integral and illustrated the applications of the improved conformable derivative to fractional differential equations by some examples.
1. Introduction
The fractional order derivative has always been an interesting research topic in the theory of functional space for many years [1–11]. Various types of fractional derivatives were introduced, among which the following Riemann-Liouville and Caputo are the most widely used ones.
Riemann-Liouville Definition. For α∈n−1,n, the α derivative of f is
(1)DαaRLft=1Γn−αdndtn∫atfxt−xα−n+1dx.
Caputo Definition. For α∈n−1,n, the α derivative of f is
(2)DαaCft=1Γn−α∫atfnxt−xα−n+1dx.
Both Riemann-Liouville definition and Caputo definition are defined via fractional integrals. Therefore, these two fractional derivatives inherit some nonlocal behaviors including historical memory and future dependence. All definitions including (1) and (2) above satisfy the property that the fractional derivative is linear. This is the only property inherited from the 1st derivative. However, the existing fractional derivatives do not satisfy the following properties which the integral derivatives have.
Most of the fractional derivatives except Caputo-type derivatives do not satisfy Dα1=0, if α is not a natural number
All fractional derivatives do not obey the familiar product rule for two functions:
(3)Dαfg=fDαg+gDαf
All fractional derivatives do not obey the familiar quotient rule for two functions:
(4)Dαfg=gDαf−fDαgg2
All fractional derivatives do not obey the chain rule:
(5)Dαfgt=fαgtDαg
Fractional derivatives do not have corresponding Rolle’s theorem
Fractional derivatives do not have a corresponding mean value theorem
In general, all fractional derivatives do not obey
(6)DαDβf=Dα+βf
The Caputo definition assumes that the function f is differentiable
To overcome some of these difficulties, Khalil et al. [12] proposed a new interesting factional derivative definition called conformable derivative that extends the familiar limit definition of the derivative of a function given by the following.
Definition 1.
Given a function f:0,+∞⟶R, then the conformable fractional derivative of f of order α is defined by
(7)Tαft=limε→0ft+εt1−α−ftε,for t>0 and α∈0,1. If f is α differentiable in some 0,a, a>0, and limt→0+Tαft exists, then define Tαf0=limt→0+Tαft. It is easy to see that if f is differentiable, then Tαft=t1−αf′t. One can find functions which are α-differentiable at a point but not differentiable at this point.
As a result of the above definition, the authors in [12] showed that the conformable derivative obeys the product rule and quotient rule and has results similar to Rolle’s theorem and the mean value theorem in classical calculus.
The conformable fractional derivative has two advantages over the classical fractional derivatives. First, the conformable fractional derivative definition is natural and it satisfies most of the properties which the classical integral derivative has such as linearity, product rule, quotient rule, power rule, chain rule, vanishing derivatives for constant functions, Rolle’s theorem, and mean value theorem. Second, the conformable derivative bring us a lot of convenience when it is applied for modelling many physical problems, because the differential equations with conformable fractional derivative are easier to solve numerically than those associated with the Riemann-Liouville or Caputo fractional derivative. In fact, many researchers have already applied conformable fractional derivative to many fields and a lot of corresponding techniques were developed [13–20].
However, there are still shortcomings or disadvantages for the conformable derivative. If we look at the Riemann-Liouville and Caputo fractional derivative definition, we have
(8)limα→0aRLDαft=limα→01Γ1−αddt∫atfxt−xαdx=ft,limα→0aCDαft=limα→01Γ1−α∫atf′xt−xαdx=ft−fa,for α∈0,1, and
(9)limα→n−1aRLDαft=limα→n−11Γn−αdndtn∫atfxt−xα−n+1dx=fn−1t,limα→n−1aCDαft=limα→n−11Γn−α∫atfnxt−xα−n+1dx=fn−1t−fn−1a,for α∈n−1,n,n=2,3,⋯, whereas
(10)limα→n−1Tαft=limα→n−1tn−αfnt=tfnt,for α∈n−1,n,n=1,2,⋯.
That means the physical meaning of the classical Riemann-Liouville and Caputo fractional derivative is quite different from that of the conformable derivative, especially when α∈n−1,n and close to n−1,n=1,2,⋯. We graph the conformable derivatives of y=sinx and y=ex in Figures 1 and 2 and make comparison with the Riemann-Liouville and Caputo fractional derivatives. We can see if the Riemann-Liouville and Caputo fractional derivatives are replaced by conformable derivative, a large error will occur. To overcome this difficulty, we propose a kind of modified conformable fractional derivative in Section 2. This modified conformable fractional derivative is a local operator on the one hand and approximates the Riemann-Liouville and Caputo fractional derivative better on the other hand. So it is a better choice to replace the classical Riemann-Liouville and Caputo fractional derivative with the improved conformable fractional derivative, especially when α∈n−1,n and close to n−1,n=1,2,⋯.
0.3th derivative of y=sinx.
0.2th derivative of y=ex.
2. Improvement on Conformable Fractional Derivative
First, we give the definition for the improved Caputo-type conformable fractional derivative aCT~αt and the improved Riemann-Liouville-type conformable fractional derivative T~αaRLt for 0≤α≤1.
Definition 2.
Given a function f:R⟶R, the improved Caputo-type conformable fractional derivative of f of order α is defined by
(11)T~αaCt=limε→01−αft−fa+αft+εt−a1−α−ftε,where −∞<a<t<+∞, a is a given number.
The improved Riemann-Liouville-type conformable fractional derivative of f of order α is defined by
(12)T~αaRLt=limε→01−αft+αft+εt−a1−α−ftε,where −∞<a<t<+∞, a is a given number.
It is easy to see
(13)limα→0aCT~αt=ft−fa=limα→0aCDαt,limα→0aRLT~αt=ft=limα→0aRLDαt.
If α=1, both T~aaCt and T~αaRLt coincide with f′t. In Definition 2, we introduce a to let T~aaRLt and T~αaRLt have a kind of historical memory as the Caputo and Riemann-Liouville fractional derivative have.
For n<α≤n+1,n=1,2,⋯, we give the following.
Definition 3.
Given a function f:R→R, the improved Caputo-type conformable fractional derivative of f of order α is defined by
(14)T~αaCt=limε→0n+1−αfnt−fna+α−nfnt+εt−an+1−α−fntε,where −∞<a<t<+∞.
The improved Riemann-Liouville-type conformable fractional derivative is defined by
(15)T~aaRLt=limε→0n+1−αfnx+α−nfnt+εt−an+1−α−fntε,where −∞<a<t<+∞.
It is easy to see
(16)limα→naCT~αt=fnt−fna=limα→naCDαt,limα→naRLT~αt=fnt=limα→naRLDαt.
If α=n+1, both T~aaCt and T~αaRLt coincide with fn+1t.
Remark 4.
As a result of Definitions 2 and 3, we can easily show that if f is 1-differentiable at t, then
(17)T~aaCft=1−αft−fa+αt−a1−αf′t,T~aaRLft=1−αft+αt−a1−αf′t,for α∈0,1. If f is n+1-differentiable at t, then
(18)T~aaCft=n+1−αfnt−fna+α−nt−an+1−αfn+1t,for α∈n,n+1,n=1,2,⋯.
In fact, compared with the conformable fractional derivative, the improved conformable fractional derivative can be a better replacement of the Caputo and Riemann-Liouville fractional derivative. One can see in Figures 3–9 that the improved conformable fractional derivative approximates the Caputo and Riemann-Liouville fractional derivative in a better way for most elementary functions especially when α is larger than and close to n and even when α is close to n+0.5,n=0,1,2,⋯.
0.2th fractional derivative of y=x2.
0.5th fractional derivative of y=x2.
0.8th fractional derivative of y=x2.
0.2th fractional derivative of y=sinx.
0.5th fractional derivative of y=sinx.
0.8th fractional derivative of y=sinx.
0.2th fractional derivative of y=ex.
Based on the results in [12], one can prove the following theorem.
Theorem 5.
We can easily show that the improved conformable fractional derivative satisfies the following properties if 0≤α≤1.
T~αaCmf+ng=maCT~αf+naCT~αg
T~αaRLmf+ng=maRLT~αf+naRLT~αg
T~αaRLfg=1−αaRLT~αfg+faRLT~αg−1−αfg
T~αaRLfgx=1−αfgx+αf′gxTαgx
Theorem 6.
We get the following improved conformable fractional derivatives of certain functions for 0≤α≤1.
T~α0Ctp=0RLT~αtp=1−αtp+αptp−α
T~α0Cλ=0,foranyconstantλ
T~α0RLλ=1−α,foranyconstantλ
T~α0Cet=1−αet−1+αt1−αet
T~α0RLet=1−αet+αt1−αet
T~α0Csint=0RLT~αsint=1−αsint+αt1−αcost
T~α0Ccost=1−αcost−1−αt1−αsint
T~α0RLcost=1−αcost−αt1−αsint
T~α0RLe1/ata
Proof.
It is very easy to verify properties (1)–(8) if we take into account the conclusions in [12]. We only prove property (9) here. From [12], we have
(19)Tαe1/ata=e1/ata.
Now, we give the following definition for α fractional integral.
Definition 7.
For α∈0,1 and continuous function f, let
(21)Iαf=1α∫0xftt1−αe1−α/α2tα−xαdt.
When α=1,I1f=∫0xftdt and coincides with the usual Riemann integral.
Theorem 8.
Suppose y0=0, we have
Iα·0RLT~αyt=0RLT~α·Iαyt=yt
Iα·0CT~αyt=0CT~α·Iαyt=yt
Proof.
We only prove (1); (2) can be proved in the same way.
(22)Iα·0RLT~αfx=1−αα∫0xftt1−αe1−α/α2tα−xαdt+∫0xf′te1−α/α2tα−xαdt=1−αα∫0xftt1−αe1−α/α2tα−xαdt+∫0xe1−α/α2tα−xαdft=fte1−α/α2tα−xα0x−1−αα∫0xftt1−αe1−α/α2tα−xαdt+1−αα∫0xftt1−αe1−α/α2tα−xαdt=fx.
Let 1−αyx+αt1−αy′x=fx; by using a variation of the constant method, we can get
(23)yx=1α∫0xftt1−αe1−α/α2tα−xαdt.
Let
(24)Iαf=1α∫0xftt1−αe1−α/α2tα−xαdt,we have 0RLT~α·Iαyt=yt.
3. Applications of Improved Conformable Fractional Derivative
We solve fractional differential equations by using the improved conformable fractional derivatives.
Example 1.
Consider the following fractional differential equation:
(25)y0.5=2Γ2.5x3/2,y0=0.
If y0.5 is understood as the Riemann-Liouville or Caputo fractional derivative, the solution to this problem is
(26)y=x2.
Now, we take y0.5 as the improved conformable fractional derivative; the problem reduces to
(27)12y+12xy′=2Γ2.5x3/2,y0=0.
We can solve this problem through the variation constant method and get the following solution:
(28)y=4Γ2.5x3/2−32x+32x−34+3Γ2.5e−2x.
If y0.5 is understood as the conformable fractional derivative, the problem reduces to
(29)xy′=2Γ2.5x3/2,y0=0,and the solution to this problem is
(30)y=1Γ2.5x2.
We compare the three solutions in Figure 10. We can see that the improved conformable fractional derivative solution is much better than the solution obtained by using the conformable fractional derivative. That means if we prefer a replacement of the Riemann-Liouville or Caputo fractional derivative, the improved conformable fractional derivative is a better choice.
Example 2.
In general, we consider the problem
(31)yα=2Γ3−αx2−α,y0=0.
We can get the following three solutions:
If yα is the Riemann-Liouville or Caputo fractional derivative, the solution is y1x=x2, and
(32)limα→0y1x=limα→0x2=x2
If yα is the conformable fractional derivative, the problem can be reduced to
(33)x1−αy′=2Γ3−αx2−α,y0=0.
The solution is
(34)y2x=1Γ3−αx2.
We can see that
(35)limα→0y2x=limα→01Γ3−α=12x2
If yα is the improved conformable fractional derivative, the problem can be reduced to
(36)1−αy+αx1−αy′=2Γ3−αx2−α,y0=0
Its solution y3x can be obtained through the variation of the constant method.
Solution to Example 1.
Since
(37)1−αy3+αx1−αy3′=2Γ3−αx2−α,we have
(38)y3=αy3−αx1−αy3′+2Γ3−αx2−α.Therefore,
(39)limα→0y3=limα→0αy3−αx1−αy3′+2Γ3−αx2−α=limα→02Γ3−αx2−α=x2=limα→0y1.
The result for the general α equation shows that the improved conformable derivative has advantages over other fractional derivatives. First, it is a good approximation to the classical Riemann-Liouville or Caputo fractional derivative so it has a similar physical meaning with the Riemann-Liouville and Caputo fractional derivative. Second, it is a local derivative operator so it is easy for numerical computing.
Example 3.
Consider the following fractional differential equation:
(40)y1.5=3Γ2.5x3/2,y0=0,y′0=0.
If y1.5 is the Caputo fractional derivative, the solution to this problem is
(41)y=x3.
If y1.5 is the conformable fractional derivative, the problem reduces to
(42)x0.5y′′=3Γ2.5x3/2,y0=0,y′0=0.
The solution to this problem is
(43)y=12Γ2.5x3.
If y1.5′ is the improved conformable fractional derivative, the problem reduces to
(44)12y′+12x0.5y′′=3Γ2.5x3/2,y0=0,y′0=0.Let y′=px, the problem further reduces to
(45)12p+12x0.5p′=3Γ2.5x3/2,p0=0.
Solve this problem by using the method of constant variation, we get
(46)p=6Γ2.5x3/2−32x+32x−34+34e−2x,(47)y=6Γ2.525x5/2−34x2+x3/2−34x−38e−2x−34xe−2x+94Γ2.5.
The solutions to Example 3 can be seen in Figure 11.
Solution of Example 3.
4. Conclusion
We propose a kind of improved conformable fractional derivative in this paper. This improved conformable fractional derivative is also local by its definition, and meanwhile, a kind of historical memory parameter is introduced to its definition. The advantage of the improved conformable derivative is that its physical behavior approximates the Riemann-Liouville and Caputo fractional derivative better than the conformable fractional derivative. So this improved conformable fractional derivative has much potential in modelling many physical problems where the Riemann-Liouville and Caputo fractional derivative is usually used.
Data Availability
Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no data sets were generated or analyzed during the current study.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
MillerK. S.1993New York, NY, USAJ. Wiley and SonsOldhamK.SpanierJ.1974Academic PressKilbasA.SrivastavaH.TrujilloJ.2006North-Holland, NY, USAMath StudiesPodlubnyI.1999Academic PressOrtigueraM. D.Tenreiro MachadoJ. A.What is a fractional derivative?201529341310.1016/j.jcp.2014.07.0192-s2.0-84939896603GeF.ChenY. Q.KouC.2018SpringerGeF.ChenY. Q.Regional output feedback stabilization of semilinear time-fractional diffusion systems in a parallelepipedon with control constraints20203093639365210.1002/rnc.4958GeF.ChenY. Q.Observer-based event-triggered control for semilinear time-fractional diffusion systems with distributed feedback20209921089110110.1007/s11071-019-05338-2GeF.ChenY. Q.Event-triggered boundary feedback control for networked reaction-subdiffusion processes with input uncertainties201947623925510.1016/j.ins.2018.10.0232-s2.0-85055130582GeF.ChenY. Q.KouC.Regional controllability analysis of fractional diffusion equations with Riemann–Liouville time fractional derivatives20177619319910.1016/j.automatica.2016.10.0182-s2.0-85001946038GeF.ChenY. Q.KouC.On the regional gradient observability of time fractional diffusion processes2016741910.1016/j.automatica.2016.07.0232-s2.0-84988914765KhalilR.Al HoraniM.YousefA.SababhehM.A new definition of fractional derivative2014264657010.1016/j.cam.2014.01.0022-s2.0-84893186929ChungW. S.Fractional newton mechanics with conformable fractional derivative201529015015810.1016/j.cam.2015.04.0492-s2.0-84930959698EslamiM.RezazadehH.The first integral method for Wu–Zhang system with conformable time-fractional derivative201653347548510.1007/s10092-015-0158-82-s2.0-84945253993EkiciM.MirzazadehM.EslamiM.ZhouQ.MoshokoaS. P.BiswasA.BelicM.Optical soliton perturbation with fractional-temporal evolution by first integral method with conformable fractional derivatives201612722106591066910.1016/j.ijleo.2016.08.0762-s2.0-84985004018AbdallaB.Oscillation of differential equations in the frame of nonlocal fractional derivatives generated by conformable derivatives20182018110.1186/s13662-018-1554-62-s2.0-85044596891RezazadehH.KumarD.SulaimanT. A.BulutH.New complex hyperbolic and trigonometric solutions for the generalized conformable fractional Gardner equation20193317, article 195019610.1142/S02179849195019632-s2.0-85066084900BouaouidM.HilalK.MellianiS.Nonlocal telegraph equation in frame of the conformable time-fractional derivative201920197752893710.1155/2019/75289372-s2.0-85063143597WangJ.BaiC.Antiperiodic boundary value problems for impulsive fractional functional differential equations via conformable derivative2018201811764312310.1155/2018/76431232-s2.0-85060177426LiS.ZhangS.LiuR.The existence of solution of diffusion equation with the general conformable derivative2020202010396526910.1155/2020/3965269