Journal of Healthcare Engineering
Volume 2018 (2018), Article ID 2389268, 7 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/2389268

Research Article

Knowledge and Attitude of Health Professionals toward Telemedicine in Resource-Limited Settings: A Cross-Sectional Study in North West Ethiopia

Kirubel Biruk¹ and Eden Abetu²

¹Debre Markos University, College of Medicine and Health Science, Department of Health Informatics, Debre Marqos, Ethiopia
²University of Gondar, College of Medicine and Health Science, Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Gondar, Ethiopia

Correspondence should be addressed to Kirubel Biruk; birukkirubel@gmail.com

Received 21 June 2018; Revised 3 August 2018; Accepted 30 August 2018; Published 18 November 2018

Academic Editor: Stefano Capolongo

Copyright © 2018 Kirubel Biruk and Eden Abetu. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

Background. In resource-limited environments, such as those categorized as underdeveloped countries, telemedicine becomes viewed as effective channel for utilizing the scarce medical resources and infrastructures. The aim of this study was to assess knowledge and attitude toward telemedicine among cross section of health professionals’ working in three hospitals in North West Ethiopia. Methods. An institution-based cross-sectional study was conducted among 312 health professionals working in three different hospitals of North Gondar Administrative Zone during November 13 to December 10, 2017. Data were collected using structured self-administered questionnaires. Data entry and analysis were done using SPSS version 20. The mean, percentage, and standard deviation were calculated to describe the characteristics of respondents. The chi-square test was used as appropriate, to evaluate the statistical significance of the differences between the responses of the participants. A value of < 0.05 was considered significant. Result. A total of 312 study subjects were approached and included in the study from November 13 to December 10, and the response rate was 95.5%. The majority of respondents (195 (65.4%)) were male, and the majority of the respondents (66.1%) were in the age group of 21–29 years. A large number of respondents (224 (75%)) were bachelor’s degree holders. Only 37.6% of the respondents had demonstrated good knowledge of telemedicine, of which 74.1% were male, 65.2% of them were in the age group of 20–29 years, and 63.4% of them had >5 years of work experience. 191 (64.0%) respondents had good attitude toward telemedicine. Conclusion. The findings of the study suggest that although the respondents’ knowledge of telemedicine is limited, most of them have good attitude toward telemedicine. This study underlined the need of giving training on telemedicine in order to fill the knowledge gap.

1. Introduction

Innovative technological advancement has caused various changes in every sector. Medical science is not an exception, and new technologies have affected both the advancement of the medicine and the way to deliver medical services [1]. This has caused a new area of health care in which medical practitioners, hospitals, health centers, and financial and medical insurance experts cooperate together in a digital environment in order to improve fairness in distribution of medical services and the quality of these services as well as reducing the costs of services. The use of information technologies in the medical and health care fields shows great potential for improving the quality and effectiveness of work done by medical organizations [2–4]. Allowing the flow of expert medical knowledge from medical, research, and teaching institutions to distant remote locations where knowledge is needed but lacking medical experts, cost, and accessibility issues are the reasons why telemedicine has been identified as possible solution to medical problems evident in underdeveloped countries [5, 6]. Despite the great promise of telemedicine, to date, its implementation in Ethiopia and other developing countries has achieved little success with low utilization [5, 7, 8]. There are possible reasons discussed in literatures that why implementation of e-health systems continues to be challenging [9–11]. As the expansion and scale-up of the telemedicine system is still ongoing in sub-Saharan Africa, a key concern of the implementation team’s efforts was that physicians’ and health professionals' reactions to the telemedicine system would impact implementation success. [12] The success of any new technology depends on many factors including the knowledge and understanding of the concept, skills, acquired attitude, and working environment by the concerned professionals. This is applicable for any technology-supported medical service providing methods such as telemedicine where it is important to train the new concept and assess how far they are professionally ready to accept and provide telemedicine services. Since telemedicine is an emerging technology in the health sector of Ethiopia, to facilitate the adoption, it prominently requires information about the knowledge and attitude toward telemedicine among health professionals [13–15]. This study is, therefore, aimed at assessing knowledge and attitude of health professionals regarding telemedicine.

2. Methods

2.1. Study Design and Setting

An institution-based cross-sectional study was conducted to assess the knowledge and attitude of health professionals among hospitals of North Gondar Administrative Zone, North West Ethiopia, from November 13 to December 10. North Gondar Zone has two district hospitals and one referral hospital serving a population of more than six million. During the study period, Debark hospital, University of Gondar specialized referral hospital, and Metema Hospital has 102, 833, and 136 health professionals, respectively. All health professionals who were on internship, unwilling health professionals to take part in this study, and those who were absent in the study place at the time of study were excluded.

2.2. Sample Size and Procedure

The sample for this study was calculated by using a single population proportion formula, with finite population correction, [16] with 95% confidence interval (CI) and a proportion of telemedicine knowledge and attitude of 50%, since there is no previous study done in the same population with a relative precision to be 5%, and 10% nonresponse rate. Accordingly, the total sample size was 312.

where = sample size with finite population correction, = population size, = statistic for a level of confidence (), = expected proportion (in proportion of one) (), and = precision (in proportion of one) ().

anticipated nonrespondent rate 10% = 29, and total sample size = 283 + 29 = 312.

Proportionate stratified simple random sampling technique was performed to select study participants from those public hospitals in North Gondar Administrative Zone. The Human Resource list of health professionals in each hospital was used as a sampling frame to identify potential study participants. We assumed that all health care providers working in the same hospital were homogenous regarding knowledge and attitude toward telemedicine. Study participants were then selected randomly using record identification numbers retrieved from the sampling frame. Lottery method was used to randomly select a set of health care providers as respondents of this study.

2.3. Data Acquisition Instrument and Analysis

Data were collected by using structured self-administered questionnaire designed for the study, pretested on 35 health professionals of Felege Hiwot Hospital before it was distributed to research participants. The questionnaire was prepared by reviewing previous related studies [12, 17–21] and was translated to local language (Amharic) and then back to English in order to ensure that the translated version gives the proper meaning. The questionnaire consists of three main parts. Part 1 includes sociodemographic information of the participants (six items), part 2 is related to the health professionals’ knowledge of telemedicine (ten items), and part 3 investigates health professionals’ attitude of the relative advantages of telemedicine (seven items), compatibility of telemedicine (four items), complexity of deploying telemedicine (five items), trial ability of telemedicine application’s ease of use (four items), and observability of telemedicine (three items) (see supplementary materials section for detail).

Respondents’ level of knowledge of telemedicine was assessed by questions to be answered in either “Yes” or “No.” A score of “1” will be given for “Yes” and “0” for “No.” One can score a minimum of 0 and a maximum of 10 in this section. In this study, the average score of 5 (50%) from the ten questions was used as a cutoff point to determine the level of knowledge of telemedicine. The mean knowledge score less than 5 (50%) was labeled as poor knowledge of telemedicine, and more than average score of 5 (50%) was labeled as good knowledge of telemedicine.

The perceived telemedicine attributes of relative advantage, compatibility, complexity, trial ability, and observability were rated on a 5-point Likert scale that ranged from “1 = strongly disagree” to “5 = strongly agree,” except for complexity attribute questions which were reversely scored (1 = strongly agree and 5 = strongly disagree). Scores for all statements for each perceived telemedicine attribute were be averaged to create the specific mean score. In this study, mean score of less than 2.5 (50%) is labeled as poor attitude, 2.6 (51%)–3.0 (60%) as moderate, and greater than 3.0 (60%) is labeled as good attitude.

One-day training on the objective and relevance of the study, confidentiality of data, respondents’ rights, informed consent, and data collection techniques was given to three individuals who were recruited to collect the data from study participants and one supervisor who conducted supportive supervision of the data collection process by the study investigators.

After collection was done, the data were checked, cleaned, edited, and analyzed by using SPSS version 20. The means and percentages were calculated to describe the profile of the respondents. The chi-square test was used as appropriate, to evaluate the statistical significance of the differences between the responses of the participants. A value of <0.05 was considered significant and presented.

2.4. Operational Definitions

In this study, telemedicine was defined as “the delivery of healthcare services, where distance is a critical factor, by all healthcare professionals using information and communication technologies for the exchange of valid information for diagnosis, treatment and prevention of disease and injuries, research and evaluation and for the continuing education of healthcare providers, all in the interests of advancing the health of individuals and their communities” [4]. Health professionals were defined as those employees with at least a diploma certificate in the health professions who are practicing clinical service in the study settings. Good knowledge of telemedicine was defined as a score of the second part of the questionnaire more than 50%. It involves knowing the medical applications of telemedicine, knowing telemedicine infrastructure, knowing telemedicine tools (such as telesurgery and teleconsultation), and knowing the effect of telemedicine on quality of care, cost, and time. Good health professionals’ attitude of telemedicine was defined as more than 50% score of the perceived relative advantage, compatibility, complexity, trial ability, and observability of telemedicine.

2.5. Ethical Consideration

In conducting the study, ethical clearance was secured from Department of Health Informatics, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Debre Markos University Ethical Review Committee. Additional permissions to access participants were obtained from the offices of Hospital Directors, and verbal informed consent from the respondents was also attained.

3. Result

A total of 312 study subjects were approached and included in the study from November 13 to December 10, and the response rate was 95.5%. The majority of respondents (195 (65.4%)) were male, and the majority age group was between 20 and 29 years (66.1%). A large number of respondents were bachelor’s degree holders (224 (75%)). Most of the study participants were nurses (158 (53.0%)), and regarding work experience, employees having less than 5 years’ work experience (221 (74.2%)) were the majorities. 127 (42.6%) respondents were employees earning monthly salary of 1500–3500 Ethiopian Birr. Responses by each hospitals and respondents' sociodemographic characteristics are presented in Tables 1 and 2, respectively.

Table 1: Responses by hospital.

Hospitals
Actual no.
Received no.
Received (%)

Debark
30
27
90

Metema
39
35
89.7

Gondar university
243
236
97.1

Total response
312
298
95.5

Table 2: Sociodemographic characteristics of study participants.

Sociodemographic status
Number
Percent

Gender

Male
195
65.4

Female
103
34.6

Age

20–29
197
66.1

30–39
62
20.8

>39
39
13.1

Educational status

Diploma
44
14.8

Degree
224
75.1

Masters
22
7.4

Others
8
2.7

Type of profession

Physician
11
3.7

Nurse
158
53.0

Health officer
13
4.4

Medical laboratory technician
38
12.8

Pharmacist
29
9.7

Midwifery
32
10.7

Others
17
5.7

Year of experience

<5
221
74.2

5–10
53
17.8

>10
24
8.0

Salary

<1500
22
7.4

1500–3500
127
42.6

3500–5500
84
28.2

>5500
65
21.8

Certificate and PhD. Physiotherapist, psychiatrist, anesthetists, radiologist, and optometrist.

Health professionals’ knowledge about telemedicine was observed from the study that 37.6% of the respondents had good knowledge of telemedicine, of which 74.1% were men, 65.2% of them were in the age group of 20–29, and 63.4% of them had >5 years of work experience. Only 22.1% (66) of the respondents have seen a telemedicine system. Most of the information sources (57.4%) about telemedicine were from colleagues of the respondents. Among physicians, 54.5% of them have good knowledge of telemedicine. Among the health professionals who were considered having good knowledge of telemedicine, 82.1% were bachelor's degree holders (Table 3 for details).

Table 3: Health professionals with good knowledge of telemedicine.

Sociodemographic
Total count
Percent
value

Gender

Male
83
74.1
0.000
X² = 23.181

Female
29
25.9

Age

20–29
73
65.2
0.069 (ns)
X² = 5.351

30–39
26
23.2

>39
13
11.6

Educational status

Diploma
9
8.0
0.000
X² = 18.140

Degree
92
82.1

Masters
8
7.1

Others
3
2.7

Type of profession

Physician
6
5.4
0.000
X² = 29.411

Nurse
65
58.0

Health officer
4
3.6

Medical laboratory technician
6
5.4

Pharmacist
12
10.7

Midwifery
8
7.1

Others
11
9.8

Year of experience

<5
71
63.4
0.008
X² = 9.576

5–10
34
30.3

>10
7
6.3

Salary

<1500
4
3.6
0.008
X² = 11.731

1500–3500
42
37.5

3500–5500
39
34.8

>5500
27
24.1

Certificate and PhD. Physiotherapist, psychiatrist, anesthetists, radiologist, and optometrist.

This finding indicated that health care professionals had good attitude toward telemedicine with a “relative advantage” mean of 4.1, “compatibility” mean of 3.4, and “trialability” mean of 3.8 and had poor attitude regarding the complexity and observability of telemedicine (2.4 and 2.3, respectively) as summarized in Table 4.

Table 4: Attitude of health professionals toward telemedicine.

Attributes of telemedicine attitude
Strongly disagree (%)
Disagree (%)
Neutral (%)
Agree (%)
Strongly agree (%)
Mean score

Relative advantage

Reduce medical errors
7.0
9.4
14.1
36.9
32.6
3.8

Facilitate diagnosis and treatment
2.0
3.7
2.7
60.1
31.5
4.2

Increase communication among health care providers
1.3
2.7
4.7
56.4
34.9
4.2

Telemedicine can reduce the number of visits to health care centers
6.0
7.4
10.4
42.3
33.9
3.9

Enables me accomplish my task more quickly
3.4
7.4
16.3
37.1
35.8
3.9

Improve clinical decisions
1.0
3.0
9.4
32.6
54.0
4.4

Provide more comprehensive health care services
0.7
1.3
7.4
37.9
52.7
4.4

Total mean score
4.1

Compatibility

In my opinion, telemedicine is compatible with all aspects of my work
8.7
14.4
10.7
41
25.2
3.6

Telemedicine is completely compatible with my current situation
10.4
11.1
11.8
38.9
27.8
3.6

I think telemedicine fits well with the way I like to work
12.1
18.1
13.4
29.6
26.8
3.4

Using telemedicine fits well into my work style
18.5
22.5
26.2
20.8
12.0
2.9

Total mean score
3.4

Complexity

I believe using telemedicine requires a lots of mental effort
10.7
9.4
3.7
46.3
29.9
2.2

Learning to operate telemedicine is hard for me
12.8
18.7
7.9
42.1
18.5
2.7

I think telemedicine increases staff work load
11.1
13.0
10.1
34.9
30.9
2.4

I think telemedicine creates new responsibilities for staff
9.4
12.7
9.7
39.3
28.9
2.3

In my opinion, telemedicine threatens information confidentiality and patient privacy
9.1
11.1
13.8
28.7
37.3
2.3

Total mean score
2.4

Trial ability

I believe to try telemedicine applications is a great opportunity
2.0
3.0
1.7
52.0
41.3
4.3

I do not have to take very much effort to try out telemedicine
11.4
16.1
22.1
27.9
22.5
3.3

I believe, using telemedicine on a trial basis is enough to see what it could do
16.1
15.8
13.1
34.5
20.5
3.3

I would like to try out telemedicine applications before using it
6.1
7.0
5.0
36.6
45.3
4.1

Total mean score
3.8

Observability

I have seen what other hospital staffs do with telemedicine technologies
32.9
28.2
5.7
17.1
16.1
2.6

Telemedicine technology is very visible in the hospital where I work
36.2
40.0
5.0
16.1
11.7
2.4

In the hospital, I see telemedicine technology being used for many tasks
38.0
42.6
3.7
9.7
6
2.0

Total mean score
2.3

Overall attitude mean score
3.2

Reverse scored.

Among the total of 298 health professionals, 191 (64.0%) respondents had good attitude toward telemedicine. 111 (54.0%) respondents strongly agreed that telemedicine improves the quality of clinical decision, whereas 197 (66.0%) respondents agreed and strongly agreed that telemedicine threatens information confidentiality and patient privacy. 61% of health care professionals in this study appeared to know the benefit of telemedicine in saving time, and 56.4% of them knew that it reduced unnecessary transportation cost. According to the finding of this study, most health professionals (155 (52%)) thought that telemedicine is complex with 229 (76.2%) respondents opinion that telemedicine requires lots of mental effort. Sociodemographic status and health professionals’ attitude toward telemedicine are shown in Table 5.

Table 5: Health professionals with good attitude toward telemedicine.

Characteristics
Number
Percent
value

Gender

Male
109
57.1
0.000
X² = 17.921

Female
82
42.9

Age

20–29
106
55.5
0.000
X² = 29.826

30–39
48
25.1

>39
37
19.4

Educational status

Diploma
16
8.4
0.000
X² = 77.512

Degree
149
78.0

Masters
18
9.4

Others
8
4.2

Type of profession

Physician
11
5.8
0.000
X² = 60.931

Nurse
87
45.5

Health officer
9
4.7

Medical laboratory technician
25
13.1

Pharmacist
24
12.6

Midwifery
21
11.0

Others
14
7.3

Year of experience

<5
134
70.1
0.000
X² = 44.959

5–10
42
22.0

>10
15
7.9

Salary

<1500
9
4.7
0.000
X² = 34.214

1500–3500
81
42.4

3500–5500
67
35.1

>5500
34
17.8

Certificate and PhD. Physiotherapist, psychiatrist, anesthetists, radiologist, and optometrist.

4. Discussion

The use of information technology in health care system is influenced by many issues. Among others, human-related components such as users’ knowledge and attitude toward technology are of high importance. A survey in Michigan State University, USA, and other similar studies show that attitude and perception is an important and key research question to explain how telemedicine is viewed and conceived by health professionals [17, 18, 22–25]. To deal with these issues, targeted strategies need to be taken into consideration to facilitate the deployment of the technology.

The purpose of this study was to measure the level of knowledge and attitude of health professionals among three hospitals in North West Ethiopia. The results suggest that most of respondents had poor knowledge of various aspects of telemedicine, and even fewer had ever heard of telemedicine (36.2%), which is by far less than the number of health professionals from the study of European regions, which is 84% [26]. From those who have heard about telemedicine, the proportion of health professionals’ source of information about the technology was mostly from their colleagues with 57.4%, which is as same as the study in Iran with 51.4% information source being colleagues [19]. The participants of this study had generally positive attitude toward telemedicine, but they also had significant concerns on its complexity and observability that 65.8% of them agreed and strongly agreed that telemedicine increases staff work load and 68.2% of them thought that telemedicine creates new responsibilities for the staff. These findings indicate that much work is needed to be done to educate health care professionals about telemedicine in order to lay the groundwork for successful and sustainable adoption of the technology in the country.

The proportion of respondents in this survey who have good knowledge of telemedicine (37.6%) was similar to the proportion of respondents of a cross-sectional study in India, which is about 41% [18] and slightly lower than the proportion of medical students in Sir Lanka (43%) from a survey of final-year medical students studying at the Faculty of Medicine, Sri Jayewardenepura University (SJU), Sri Lanka [27].

A study in Mashhad, Iran, in selected teaching hospitals also showed that health professionals have low knowledge about telemedicine with total awareness of health professionals with 13 ± 5.5 out of 35, which signified as low, and from those health professionals participated in the study, most of them have positive attitude toward telemedicine with total score of 63.42 ± 9.5 out of 95 (65%), which indicates a total positive attitude [19] that is almost similar with the result of this study.

Another finding in Isfahan, Iran, that 48.4% of the participants have good awareness and 63.3% of the participants have favorable attitude regarding telemedicine somehow conforms to this study [20].

Finally, this finding revealed that the majority of health professional’s knowledge was low, and their attitude toward telemedicine was found to be good, which is in line with the previous results of similar studies.

5. Conclusion

As telemedicine is a new concept in health care service in Ethiopia, its implementation has not been as much satisfactory and successful. However, the respondents of this study confirmed positive attitude toward telemedicine. According to these findings, there is an opportunity for telemedicine to be fully integrated in the health care system in Northern Ethiopia if appropriate training and education is provided for the health care professionals. Therefore, before the deployment of this technology, it is very important to consider improving users’ knowledge of the technology and demonstrate its competencies and benefits because ample knowledge and affirmative opinions of the technology are key factors to reassure users to use the technology in the future.

6. Limitation of the Study

The major limitation of this study was the small sample size, which was due to limited resource issue, and it was conducted among health professionals working in North Gondar Administrative Zone hospitals which were only three. Due to this reason, results may not be attributed to the whole health professional population. It would be more useful and generalizable if this study was conducted in the whole country to determine the knowledge and attitude of a larger sample of health professionals in more facilities and regions than we were able to cover.

Data Availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this article and its supplementary information files.

Ethical Approval

Ethical clearance was secured from Department of Health Informatics, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Debre Markos University Ethical Review Committee. Additional permissions to access participants were obtained from the offices of Hospital Directors, and verbal informed consent from the respondents was also attained.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

KB made substantial contributions to conception and design and acquisition of data, data collection supervision, data analysis, interpretation of data, and preparation of the manuscript. EA agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. Both were involved in drafting and revising the manuscript and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank all health professionals for their time and effort spent during the data collection period.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary materials include the questioner used for data collection with 6 items related to sociodemographic characteristics of participants, 10 items related to telemedicine knowledge, and 22 items related to attitude toward telemedicine. (Supplementary Materials)

References

R. L. Bashshur, G. W. Shannon, E. A. Krupinski et al., “National telemedicine initiatives: essential to healthcare reform,” Telemedicine and e-Health, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 600–610, 2009.

J. H. Thrall and G. Boland, “Telemedicine in practice,” Seminars in Nuclear Medicine, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 145–157, 1998.

A. Wiborg and B. Widder, “Teleneurology to improve stroke care in rural areas. The telemedicine in stroke in swabia,” Stroke, vol. 34, no. 12, pp. 2951–2956, 2003.

S. Ryu, “Telemedicine: opportunities and developments in member states: report on the second global survey on eHealth 2009 (global observatory for eHealth series, volume 2),” Healthcare Informatics Research, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 153–155, 2012.

D. Wamala and K. Augustine, “A meta-analysis of telemedicine success in Africa,” Journal of Pathology Informatics, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 6, 2013.

A. Dasgupta and S. Deb, “Telemedicine: a new horizon in public health in India,” Indian Journal of Community Medicine Official Publication of Indian Association of Preventive and Social Medicine, vol. 33, no. 1, p. 3, 2008.

M. Kifle, F. C. Payton, V. Mbarika, and P. Meso, “Transfer and adoption of advanced information technology solutions in resource-poor environments: the case of telemedicine systems adoption in Ethiopia,” Telemedicine and e-Health, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 327–343, 2010.

K. Mengistu, V. W. A. Mbarika, and V. R. Bradley, “Global diffusion of the internet X: the diffusion of telemedicine in Ethiopia: potential benefits, present challenges, and potential factors,” Communications of the Association for Information Systems, vol. 18, no. 30, pp. 612–640, 2006.

T. H. Broens, R. M. Huis in’t Veld, M. M. Vollenbroek-Hutten, H. J. Hermens, A. T. van Halteren, and L. J. Nieuwenhuis, “Determinants of successful telemedicine implementations: a literature study,” Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 303–309, 2007.

T. R. F. Postema, J. M. Peeters, and R. D. Friele, “Key factors influencing the implementation success of a home telecare application,” International Journal of Medical Informatics, vol. 81, no. 6, pp. 415–423, 2012.

M. Nazviya and S. Kodukula, “Evaluation of critical success factors for telemedicine implementation,” International Journal of Computer Applications, vol. 12, no. 10, pp. 29–36, 2011.

G. T. Olok, W. O. Yagos, and E. Ovuga, “Knowledge and attitudes of doctors towards e-health use in healthcare delivery in government and private hospitals in Northern Uganda: a cross-sectional study,” BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, vol. 15, no. 1, p. 87, 2015.

D. S. Edirippulige, A. C. Smith, J. Young, and R. Wootton, “Knowledge, perceptions and expectations of nurses in e-health: results of a survey in a children's hospital,” Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 35–38, 2006.

D. Jayasinghe, R. M. Crowder, and G. Wills, “Model for the adoption of telemedicine in Sri Lanka,” SAGE Open, vol. 6, no. 3, Article ID 2158244016668565, 2016.

N. Demartines, O. Freiermuth, D. Mutter, M. Heberer, and F. Harder, “Knowledge and acceptance of telemedicine in surgery: a survey,” Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 125–131, 2000.

L. Naing and B. N. Rusli, “Practical issues in calculating the sample size for prevalence studies,” Archives of Orofacial Sciences, vol. 1, pp. 9–14, 2006.

H. Ayatollahi, S. F. Z. P. Sabari, and M. Langarizadeh, “Clinicians’ knowledge and perception of telemedicine technology,” Perspectives in Health Information Management, vol. 12, p. 1, 2015.

Z. Zayapragassarazan and S. Kumar, “Awareness, knowledge, attitude and skills of telemedicine among health professional faculty working in teaching hospitals,” Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research: JCDR, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 1–4, 2016.

A. Sheikhtaheri, M. Sarbaz, K. Kimiafar, M. Ghayour, and S. Rahmani, “Awareness, attitude and readiness of clinical staff towards telemedicine: a study in Mashhad, Iran,” Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, vol. 228, pp. 142–146, 2016.

H. Keshvari, A. Haddadpoor, B. Taheri, and M. Nasri, “Determining the awareness and attitude of employees in Deputy of Health of Isfahan University of Medical Science toward telemedicine and its advantages,” Acta Informatica Medica, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 97–101, 2015.

R. Parvin and M. Shahjahan, “Knowledge, attitude and practice on ehealth among doctors working at selected private hospitals in Dhaka, Bangladesh,” Journal of International Society for Telemedicine and eHealth, vol. 4, 2016.

P. Whitten, B. Holtz, and L. Nguyen, “Keys to a successful and sustainable telemedicine program,” International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 211–216, 2010.

R. Ward, C. Stevens, P. Brentnall, and J. Briddon, “The attitudes of health care staff to information technology: a comprehensive review of the research literature,” Health Information and Libraries Journal, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 81–97, 2008.

C. Dockweiler and C. Hornberg, “Knowledge and attitudes as influencing factors for adopting health care technology among medical students in Germany,” Journal of International Society for Telemedicine and eHealth, vol. 2, no. 1, p. 7, 2014.

F. Shiferaw and M. Zolfo, “The role of information communication technology (ICT) towards universal health coverage: the first steps of a telemedicine project in Ethiopia,” Global Health Action, vol. 5, no. 1, Article ID 15638, 2012.

T. Mairinger, C. Gabl, P. Derwan, G. Mikuz, and O. Ferrer-Roca, “What do physicians think of telemedicine? A survey in different European regions,” Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 50–56, 1996.

S. Edirippulige, R. B. Marasinghe, A. C. Smith et al., “Medical students’ knowledge and perceptions of e-health: results of a study in Sri Lanka,” Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, vol. 129, no. 2, pp. 1406–1409, 2007.