Journal of Immunology Research
Volume 2018 (2018), Article ID 3491269, 13 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3491269

Review Article

TNIP1 in Autoimmune Diseases: Regulation of Toll-like Receptor Signaling

Rambon Shamilov1,2 and Brian J. Aneskievich1,3

¹Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269-3092, USA
²Graduate Program in Pharmacology & Toxicology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269-3092, USA
³Stem Cell Institute, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269-3092, USA

Correspondence should be addressed to Brian J. Aneskievich; brian.aneskievich@uconn.edu

Received 8 June 2018; Accepted 17 September 2018; Published 3 October 2018

Academic Editor: Cinzia Ciccacci

Copyright © 2018 Rambon Shamilov and Brian J. Aneskievich. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

TNIP1 protein is increasingly being recognized as a key repressor of inflammatory signaling and a potential factor in multiple autoimmune diseases. In addition to earlier foundational reports of TNIP1 SNPs in human autoimmune diseases and TNIP1 protein-protein interaction with receptor regulating proteins, more recent studies have identified new potential interaction partners and signaling pathways likely modulated by TNIP1. Subdomains within the TNIP1 protein as well as how they interact with ubiquitin have not only been mapped but inflammatory cell- and tissue-specific consequences subsequent to their defective function are being recognized and related to human disease states such as lupus, scleroderma, and psoriasis. In this review, we emphasize receptor signaling complexes and regulation of cytoplasmic signaling steps downstream of TLR given their association with some of the same autoimmune diseases where TNIP1 has been implicated. TNIP1 dysfunction or deficiency may predispose healthy cells to the inflammatory response to otherwise innocuous TLR ligand exposure. The recognition of the anti-inflammatory roles of TNIP1 and improved integrated understanding of its physical and functional association with other signaling pathway proteins may position TNIP1 as a candidate target for the design and/or testing of next-generation anti-inflammatory therapeutics.

1. Introduction

Autoimmune diseases are chronic, relapsing disorders characterized by immune dysregulation featuring loss of tolerance, generation of autoreactive T and B cells, circulating autoantibodies, and chronic inflammation. For those pathologies with genetic variant or expression level differences in the anti-inflammatory protein TNIP1 (TNFα-induced protein 3- (TNFAIP3-) interacting protein 1), this can be associated with increased immune cell activation and infiltration leading to tissue-specific defects including but not limited to loss of serum protein to the urine (lupus nephritis), failure of the epidermal barrier (psoriasis), or diminished lung function (systemic sclerosis). These cases occur in the larger cohort of autoimmune diseases. When considered together, these include about 30 diseases with an estimated prevalence of ~9% which in turn is modulated by gender, age, and ethnicity [1, 2]. Compounding these numbers, the incidence of autoimmune disease in westernized countries appears to be increasing [3, 4]. Costing over 100 billion dollars in healthcare expenses and as a leading cause of morbidity especially in women under sixty-five [5], autoimmune diseases are devastating to patients. While major histocompatibility complex (MHC) genes [6] are central to many of these diseases, environmental factors including diet, UV irradiation, drug exposure, and infectious agents [3, 7] as well as numerous non-MHC susceptibility loci [8] are being recognized as players in the complex etiology of autoimmune diseases. Treatment for autoimmune disease has revolved around managing immune-mediated hyperactivity by dampening inflammatory responses and immune cell proliferation. However, this approach leaves patients vulnerable to opportunistic infections which can be life-threatening [9]. Thus, there is a continuous need to discover and define potential inflammatory signal suppressors, some of which are present in those disease-associated non-MHC loci, whose deficiency or dysfunction could contribute to autoimmune disease. There is significant building evidence that TNIP1 (also known as ABIN-1, Naf1, and VAN) [10–12] fits this description. As a suppressor of inflammatory signaling downstream of Toll-like receptors (TLRs), TNIP1 could play a pivotal role in specific autoimmune diseases. TNIP1 genetic association with certain autoimmune diseases and its negative regulation of inflammatory signaling will be explored in this review. Mechanistic understanding of signaling regulators such as TNIP1 could lead to them becoming therapeutic targets.

2. TNIP1 (TNFAIP3-Interacting Protein 1)

2.1. Genome-Wide Association and Expression-Regulating Studies: Implications in Inflammatory Disease

Over the last decade, TNIP1 has been reported among the highest scoring non-MHC genes across multiple genome-wide association studies (GWAS), spanning multiple populations and diseases including psoriatic arthritis [13–16], systemic sclerosis [17, 18], systemic lupus erythematosus [19–24], and psoriasis [25–27]. TNIP1 sequence variations (single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs)) in these populations implicate it in what are nevertheless diseases with likely multiple genetic and environmental factors. However, even with the identification of the heritability of autoimmune disease through twin and familial studies [28, 29], no single gene has been established as the culprit. In common with other disease-associated SNPs [30], those identified for TNIP1 are more likely intergenic and intronic [16, 18, 23, 26]. In general, such nucleotide changes may lessen transcription factor binding at a gene promoter, mRNA processing efficiency, and/or mRNA half-life, leading to decreased protein [31]. Additionally, two microRNAs, miR-517a/c, targeting TNIP1 message, significantly decrease TNIP1 protein levels when transfected in HEK293 cells [32]. In contrast, an apparently phenotypically silent SNP in the TNIP1 mRNA 3’UTR can reduce the negative effect of miR-517a/c. Together, these studies suggest multiple processing and turnover events that contribute to TNIP1 message abundance where those leading to decreased steady-state levels would allow for greater activation of NF-B and hyperresponsiveness to TLR stimuli. While such laboratory investigations functionally link TNIP1 protein levels to the regulation of inflammatory pathway signaling, more study is required to determine what expression steps (mRNA processing, mRNA and protein half-life) are normally or pathologically contributing to these levels.

Parallel to genetic studies, expression microarray experiments have implicated TNIP1 in disease pathogenesis although seemingly paradoxically as its increased transcription was reported for the inflammatory diseases of rheumatoid arthritis and psoriasis [26, 33]. Increased TNIP1 transcription also occurs in B cells following the occupation of cell surface CD40 [34]. These results are actually consistent with positive regulation of TNIP1 expression by NF-κB and its corresponding binding sites in the human TNIP1 gene promoter [35, 36] and the activation of B cell NF-κB post CD40 occupation [37]. However, such mRNA increases are not universally predictive of disease state protein levels as Chen et al. showed decreased TNIP1 protein in psoriatic plaques [38] consistent with loss of its repressive effect and promotion of inflammatory skin disease. In complementary studies, we showed overexpression [39] of TNIP1 protein in HaCaT keratinocytes that led to decreased expression of multiple inflammation-associated genes including interleukin (IL)-6 while TNIP1 reduction [40] promoted expression of numerous cytokine and chemokine genes. Together, these studies demonstrate TNIP1 as an important inflammatory signal response and regulator gene in diverse cell types. It also corroborates the spontaneous systemic autoimmunity observed with TNIP1 deficiency or loss-of-function mutations characterized in part by increased NF-κB activation [41, 42].

2.2. Cellular Location and Role in Cell Activation

TNIP1 is found ubiquitously throughout the body in both the nuclear and cytoplasmic compartments of cells [43] where it has been implicated as a mediator of multiple pathways. For example, it functions in the nucleus where it can act as a corepressor of ligand-bound retinoic acid receptors (RARs) [44] and peroxisome proliferator acid receptors (PPARs) [45]. TNIP1 is found in the cytoplasm as well where it is able to interact with HIV-encoded proteins nef [11] and matrix [12], modulate signaling downstream of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) via interactions with ERK2 [46], and interact with the ubiquitin-editing protein TNFAIP3 (alias A20 with roles in inflammation and autoimmunity that have been reviewed elsewhere [47]). The interaction between A20 and TNIP1, mediated by the ABIN-homology domain 1 (AHD1) domain of TNIP1 [48], promotes negative regulation of MAPK activation as well as NF-κB-mediated gene transcription downstream of TNFR and TLRs [10, 42]. TNIP1 function as a negative modulator downstream of select cell membrane receptors and its loss or dysfunction could lead to initiation and perpetuation of an autoimmune phenotype.

2.3. Identification of Ubiquitin-Sensing Domain: Importance in Mediating Inflammation

TNIP1 does not possess enzymatic activity and is thought to influence intracellular signaling through association with its binding partner ubiquitin-editing enzyme A20 (alias TNFAIP3) [49, 50]. The TNIP1-A20 complex then utilizes the ubiquitin-binding domain of ABIN and NEMO (UBAN, alias AHD2) within TNIP1 for the recognition of linear (Met1) and K62-linked polyubiquitin chains [48]. The homologous UBAN domains also occur in TNIP2, TNIP3, and optineurin with a presumed similar role in the control of cytoplasmic signaling. Expected UBAN functionality stems from earlier reports that polyubiquitin binding by NEMO was a key to NF-κB-mediated transcription downstream of TNFα [51–53]. Current understanding of polyubiquitin in signaling downstream of TLRs (among other receptors) describes two roles of polyubiquitin. Firstly, polyubiquitin acts as an activator of kinases by inducing conformational changes in those enzymes when bound (e.g., TAB2/TAB3 binding K63-ubiquitin then activating TAK1 within the TAB2/3/TAK1 complex). Secondly, polyubiquitin may act as a scaffold for colocalization of different complexes associated with TLR activation (e.g., TAB2/TAB3/TAK1 complex activation of the NEMO/IKKα/β complex through K63/Met1 hybrid polyubiquitin chains) [54] (Figure 1(a)). These interactions promote eventual phosphorylation of targets including MAPKs and the inhibitor of NF-kappa Bα (IκBα) [55]. Initial studies described TNIP1 as capable of increasing the rate of A20-mediated removal of polyubiquitin; with decreased expression of TNIP1 via siRNA knockdown, the rate of A20-mediated de-ubiquitination of NEMO was decreased [56]. However, more recently it has been shown that knock-in mice with A20 mutants featuring no de-ubiquitinase activity presented phenotypically normal and showed normal responsiveness to both TLR (LPS) and TNFR (TNF) ligands [57]. TNIP1 has also been shown to function in signal repression even in the absence of A20 [41, 58]. In the latter study, floxed alleles of A20 and TNIP1 (ABIN-1) in a villin-ER/Cre + mouse system were used to examine intestinal epithelial cell responses to tamoxifen-induced TNIP1 and/or A20 deletion. With the loss of A20 alone, TNIP1 seems to function independently and provide some compensatory response limiting the extensive mortality observed with the dual A20/TNIP1 knockout. As those investigators concluded, there appears to be a “synergistic, though asymmetric, relationship” between A20 and TNIP1 (ABIN-1) [58]. This points to TNIP1 promoting repression of signaling not only due to increased A20 ubiquitin-editing activity but also due to a potential mechanism where TNIP1 disrupts scaffold formation dependent on polyubiquitination and complex formation through binding and prevention of protein-protein interactions (Figures 1(b) and 1(c)).

(a)

(b)

(c)

Figure 1: Toll-like receptor signaling—regulation by TNIP1. (a) With TLR dimerization and recruitment of adaptor proteins at the membrane level, ubiquitination of target proteins promotes activation of kinase activity and complex formation. Diverse consequences occur depending on the TLR activated. In the case of TLR3-TRAF3-TRIF, TBK1 becomes ubiquitinated and, in combination with IKKε, promotes phosphorylation of transcription factors (IRF3) upstream of interferon secretion. TLR3 activation may also promote RIP1 ubiquitination, which allows for RIP1 to interact with TAK1/TAB2/3 or NEMO, resulting in gene transcription events regulating inflammation and apoptosis. IRAK1 becomes ubiquitinated followed by TAK1 activation with TAB2/3 binding K-63 linked ubiquitin which forms a hybrid complex with linear (Met1-linked) ubiquitin on NEMO allowing for TAK1 to phosphorylate IKKβ. This eventually results in the release of NF-κB subunits from IκBα. TNIP1 regulation of these events is believed to occur by (b) removal of K63-linked ubiquitin chains via TNIP1/A20 binding and A20 de-ubiquitinase activity and/or (c) inhibition of complex formation by competition for polyubiquitin binding.

Aside from NEMO, other targets of polyubiquitin downstream of TLR activation have been described as negatively regulated by TNIP1 including TANK-binding kinase 1 (TBK1) [59], receptor-interacting serine/threonine kinase 1 (RIP1 or RIPK1) [41], and interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase 1 (IRAK1) [42]. Association of TNIP1 with IRAK1 was abolished with a loss of function mutation in its UBAN domain despite the presence of TLR4 agonist LPS. Loss of UBAN function promoted increased IRF3-mediated transcription downstream of K63 ubiquitin target TBK1 in the presence of TLR3 agonist. RIP1, another TNIP1 interaction partner, participates in signaling downstream of both TLR and TNF receptors, mediating inflammatory responses [60] and cell-death signals [61]. Loss of TNIP1 UBAN functionality (QQ477EE mutation) prevents this interaction and associated regulation of programmed cell death (PCD) [41]. More recently, RIP1 regulation by TNIP1 has been determined to be dependent on both Met1 ubiquitination and K63 ubiquitination, ultimately promoting de-ubiquitination of RIP1 by a more stable A20 [62]. The importance and widespread effects of TNIP1 repression on inflammatory pathways are clearly based on diverse targets of TNIP1-mediated regulation described above. Beyond inflammatory signaling pathways, polyubiquitination affects structure, function, and stability of almost innumerable proteins and thus the related biological consequences of those proteins [63]. We suggest that future studies of TNIP1 interacting with these ubiquitinated proteins are likely to reveal the new and wide-reaching significance of the TNIP1 protein.

3. Toll-like Receptors (TLR)

3.1. Structure and Role in Cell Activation

Following exposure to microbes, cellular mechanisms are activated to recognize these foreign pathogens and eliminate them. These mechanisms rely on both innate and adaptive immunity through recognition by antigen-specific and nonspecific receptors. During innate immunity, foreign pathogens are recognized by pattern-recognition receptors (PRRs) which include Toll-like receptors, a family of type 1 transmembrane receptors capable of forming hetero- or homodimers on the cell membrane (TLR1, 2, 4, 5, and 6) and intracellularly (TLR3, 7, 8, and 9) within endosomes, lysosomes, or the endoplasmic reticulum [64]. TLRs are commonly expressed on sentinel inflammatory cells such as macrophages and dendritic cells as well as on nonimmune cells such as fibroblasts and epithelial cells [65]. As a component of the innate immune system, TLRs allow for a rapid response to environmental triggers in defense against microbial infections [66]. These receptors are capable of recognizing environmental cues, known as pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs), associated with foreign pathogens (bacteria, fungi, parasites, and viruses). TLRs are also capable of recognizing host-derived endogenous ligands referred to as damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) which include free fatty acids, oxidized lipids as well as heat-shock proteins (HSP60 and HSP70) and extracellular membrane (ECM) components released during cell injury and apoptosis [64, 67]. PAMPs recognized by TLRs can be separated into two types based on whether they are sensed externally (e.g., bacterial lipids and lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and flagellin) or within intracellular compartments (e.g., nucleic acids including viral dsRNA, ssRNA, and CpG-DNA).

3.2. Key Components and Divergent Pathways

Common to TLR is an extracellular domain featuring leucine-rich repeats (LRRs), which allow for diversity in recognizing agonists, and a cytoplasmic Toll/IL-1 receptor (TIR) domain involved in adaptor protein recruitment associated with receptor activation/dimerization [68]. With binding of PAMP or DAMP by the LRR domain, downstream consequences include secretion of chemokines, proinflammatory cytokines, and/or type I/II interferons. This is mediated by a number of recruited TIR domain-containing proteins (Figure 1(a)) including myeloid differentiation primary-response protein 88 (MyD88), TIR-domain-containing adaptor protein inducing β interferon (TRIF), TIR-domain-containing adaptor molecule (TIRAP), or TIR-domain-containing adaptor molecule (TRAM). Excluding TLR3, all other TLR initiate signaling by recruiting MyD88 (with TLR1, 2, 4, and 6 recruiting intermediate adaptor protein TIRAP along with MyD88) [69]. TLR3 acts through recruitment of TRIF, with TLR3 requiring secondary adaptor protein TRAM. Although shared signaling events such as phosphorylation and ubiquitination occur, there is a divergence in the use of receptor adaptor protein MyD88.

3.2.1. MyD88-Dependent Signaling Pathway

Loss of MyD88 expression has been associated with decreased ability to mount an immunological response to certain types of infections in mice and humans [70–72]. MyD88 acts as a key bridge between the death domain (DD) containing IL-1R-associated kinase (IRAK) 4 and the TIR domain of TLRs. IRAK-4, a serine/threonine kinase, drives signaling by promoting the activation of two other IRAK proteins, IRAK-1 and IRAK-2, forming what is called the Myddosome [73]. Due to its importance in signaling, efforts have been ongoing to target IRAK-4 therapeutically [74]. With activation of IRAK-1 and IRAK-2, the IRAK proteins dissociate and form a complex TNFR-associated factor 6 (TRAF6) which acts as an E3 ligase in concert with E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme complex UBC13 and UEV1A, promoting auto-K63-linked ubiquitination and activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase 7 (TAK1). TAK1 plays a central role in the activation of both canonical pathways resulting in NF-κB-mediated transcription and noncanonical pathways leading to AP-1-mediated transcription via ERK/JNK/P38 [69]. TAK1 activation is believed to occur following TAK1 complex formation with TAK1-binding protein 1 (TAB1), TAB2, and TAB3. This complex formation (Figure 1(a)) is dependent on TAB2/3 interaction with K63-linked polyubiquitin [75]. Activation of TAK1 promotes further activation of the IκB kinase (IKKβ) and MAP kinase kinase 6. IKKβ is associated with IKKα and NEMO (known as IKKγ) and leads to phosphorylation, K48-linked ubiquitination of NF-κB inhibitor alpha (IκBα), and proteasomal degradation freeing NF-κB subunits to translocate into the nucleus. NEMO association with linear polyubiquitin via the linear ubiquitin chain assembly complex (LUBAC) is a key to the eventual IκBα degradation via the IKK complex (IKKα, IKKβ, NEMO) [76]. Compartmentalized TLR7 and 9 are distinct from other MyD88-dependent TLRs in that they can promote interferon secretion (mainly IFNα), making them powerful tools against invading microbe-associated nucleic acids. This occurs through IRF7 activation by IRAK-1 phosphorylation in a MyD88, IRAK-1, TRAF3, IKKα, and IRK7 complex [77].

3.2.2. Non-MyD88-Dependent Signaling Pathway

TLR3 signaling was reported as one of the two TLRs sensitive to TRIF-deficiency in mice [78]. MyD88 deficiency in bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDM) promoted increased TLR3-mediated cytokine secretion [79]. Through TRIF, TLR3 is capable of inducing TRAF6-mediated gene expression, as in MyD88-dependent signaling, by promoting K63-linked ubiquitination of RIP1 (Figure 1(a)), with pellino1 being a key in the activation of RIP1 [80]. RIP1 can then promote activation of the TAK1 complex and subsequent events leading to IκBα degradation. TRAF3, an E3 ligase like TRAF6, promotes TRAF6-independent [81] IRF3 phosphorylation by ubiquitination of TANK-binding kinase 1 (TBK1) and formation of IKKε/TBK1 complex. Activated IRF3 forms a dimer and enters the nucleus where it promotes type I IFNs secretion.

4. TNIP1 in Inflammation and Disease

With all the unknown factors remaining in regard to the initiation of autoimmune or hyperinflammatory conditions, it is clear that there are multiple simultaneous factors contributing to these diseases. One such factor is a genetic component such as DNA sequence variants found in association with specific disease states. As presented below, TNIP1 is an oft-cited gene in GWAS studies with SNPs in certain populations suffering from systemic lupus erythematosus, psoriasis, and systemic sclerosis [13–16]. For recent consideration of possible genetic association of TNIP1 with other autoimmune diseases such as Sjögren syndrome and psoriatic arthritis, the reader is directed to [82, 83].

4.1. Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

In SLE, the loss of immune tolerance and with it, triggering of autoreactive T and B cells appears as a key to the development and progression of the disease state which is compounded by genetic predispositions and exposure to environmental risk factors. Plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs) are antigen presenting cells (APC) capable of sensing ssRNA and unmethylated CpG DNA sequences through endosomal TLR7 and 9, respectively [84]. When activated by these ligands, pDCs produce high levels of type I interferons (IFNα/β) (Figure 2). IFNα has been implicated in many clinical manifestations of SLE [85] and, interestingly, when used therapeutically, IFNα has been shown to induce a SLE-like phenotype [86]. pDC activation by host DAMPs is avoided as these cells can distinguish between microbial and self-nucleic acids [87]. However, such tolerance is believed to be compromised with generation and accumulation of increased protein and nucleic acid associated DAMPs from apoptosis-associated proteases and nucleases. Circulating pDCs internalize these new DAMPS with complexes formed with IgG leading to potent activation of endosomal TLR7 and 9 [88, 89] and increased IFNα production [90–92]. TLR7 null mice were partially protected from similar effects due to decreased pDC responsiveness and in-turn reduced IFNα and IL-6 expression [93]. Conversely, increased expression of TLR7 in transgenic mice overexpressing TLR7 spontaneously developed fatal and acute immune dysregulation and autoimmunity [94]. With these observations in human SLE patients and mice experiments, the importance of TLR activation in the progression of the SLE phenotype becomes clear.

Figure 2: IL-23/Th17 axis of psoriasis. Proposed paracrine signaling with TNIP1 regulation in psoriasis where nonimmune cells are keratinocytes [111]. We would suggest that variations of this could be relevant for SLE and SSc, where the nonimmune cells are a podocyte or fibroblast, respectively. For instance, following TLR7 or 9 activation of APCs in SLE, paracrine signaling would include type I interferons.

The GWAS correlation of TNIP1 sequence variants to several autoimmune diseases [17–19, 22, 26], for example, and evidence of NF-κB signaling possibly under TNIP1 control post-TLR signaling [10, 19, 26, 50, 95] provided rationale for investigating SLE-like characteristics in knockout or mutant knock-in mouse models, respectively, with missing or dysfunctional TNIP1 protein. Such mouse experimental systems set the stage to study TNIP1 functional differences underlying likely contribution to phenotypes of the whole animal activated immune systems.

To address the high proportion of late embryonic Tnip1 −/− lethality seen earlier [41], Zhou and colleagues crossed 129S2 ES-cell-derived Tnip1 +/− mice to a C57BL/6 background [96]. Although the influence of mouse genetic strain remains unresolved, there is an increase in phenotypically normal live-born pups; however, by four months of age, these mice develop a wasting syndrome along with leukocyte infiltration of kidneys, liver, and lungs. Echoing a SLE phenotype, there are increased levels of autoreactive antibodies against dsDNA and development of significant glomerulonephritis which are not rescued by a TNFR null background. In contrast to the expected NF-κB-mediated transcriptional increases, CpG occupation of TLR9 in Tnip1 −/− bone marrow-derived macrophages [96], strikingly activates C/EBPβ-regulated promoters including that of proinflammatory SLE severity-correlating S100A8 [97]. Strikingly, knock-in mice engineered with a Tnip1 mutant [D485N] [42] defective in binding both K63-linked and linear polyubiquitin chains (see UBAN section above), and therefore with predicted increased TNFα sensitivity, are born at the same size and frequency of Tnip1 +/+ mice. These Tnip1 [D485N] mice show age-associated autoimmunity marked by enlarged spleens and circulating levels of antinuclear and anti-DNA antibodies, the latter consistent with the development of severe glomerulonephritis [42]. For cultured cells, Tnip1 [D485N] MEF do not display TNFα-enhanced activation of MAPKs but do show exaggerated responses via activation of JNK, p38, and NF-κB in B cells and BMDC exposed to several TLR ligands including LPS (TLR4), lipoteichoic acid (TLR2/6), and R848 (TLR7). Along these lines, when challenged with TNFα, human immortalized kidney podocyte cells recombinantly expressing the human ubiquitin-binding deficient homologue mutant [D472N] but not human wildtype TNIP1 [98] have increased expression of numerous chemokine genes echoing increased NF-κB-regulated inflammatory signaling in SLE and glomerulonephritis patient kidney samples. Further complementary studies of both receptors’ cytoplasmic activation steps should help determine the full range of TNIP1 protein suppressive capabilities. For instance, in Tnip1 [D485N] mice, a lupus nephritis-like presentation is prevented when crossed to backgrounds with catalytically inactive signaling proteins downstream of TLRs such as IRAK-1 or IRAK-4 [99].

The range and sometimes divergence of TNIP1 effects on postreceptor signaling interpreted from overexpression studies, whole animal null or knock-in, and cell-specific deletion [100–103] may be reflecting its as yet uncharacterized quantitative and/or qualitative characteristics. These may arise from mouse strain influences, varying expression levels of TNIP1 protein and/or its varying interacting partners in different cells [11, 43, 104, 105] and cell- or organ-specific sensitivity to various cytokine and PAMP/DAMP receptor agonists. Further study in these complementary systems will help to advance our understanding of a role for TNIP1 in SLE pathology. Reconciling such differences will be central to considering any possible therapeutic targeting of TNIP1’s repression of the multiple signaling pathways downstream of distinct membrane receptors.

4.2. Psoriasis

Psoriasis is a chronic skin disorder affecting about 2% of people in the United States, most commonly manifested as plaque psoriasis (psoriasis vulgaris) and accounting for about 90% of all cases. Psoriasis is an immune-mediated disorder that manifests in the skin or joints, which is influenced by both environmental and genetic components [106]and characterized by aberrations in the skin epithelium specifically hyperproliferation in the epidermis and hyperactive keratinocytes with increased mitotic rates. This increased replication of keratinocytes results in poor maturation leading to incomplete cornification observed clinically as poor barrier function and histologically as retained nuclei in the stratum corneum (parakeratosis) and thickening of the epidermis (acanthosis) with elongated rete ridges. Immune infiltration is a hallmark of psoriasis featuring increased dendritic cells (DCs) and macrophages in the dermis and neutrophils in the epidermis. T cells are found in increased numbers in both with higher numbers of Th1, Th17, and Th22-polarized T cells [107]. Family-based linkage studies have established the strongest genetic links to psoriasis with the class 1 region of the MHC cluster near the HLA-Cw6 allele. These studies are consistent with GWAS studies which have identified the same HLA region as well as other genes including IL-23R, IL-12β (p40), and TNIP1 [26, 108, 109].

Differential TNIP1 expression in psoriatic patients versus healthy controls has been described previously [26] with observed increases in mRNA expression coupled with a 2-fold decrease in protein expression in the patients [38]. To establish models of TNIP1 loss in psoriasis, various cell culture models and in vivo approaches have been taken. Chen et al. used TNIP1 shRNA injection to promote local TNIP1 deficiency in a region of the skin followed by topical exposure to the TLR7 agonist imiquimod (IMQ), which is a compound used frequently to promote psoriasis-like phenotype in mice [110]. In these mice, tissue with reduced TNIP1 had a significantly higher overall psoriasis disease score, as compared to wild-type IMQ treated. This included increased raised, scaly, erythematous plaques marked by epidermal thickening, hyperkeratosis, and parakeratosis. These characteristics closely mimic the presentation of psoriasis in human patients. Using a TNIP1 null line challenged with IMQ, Ippagunta et al. demonstrated that skin inflammation has more characteristic of psoriasis than atopic eczema via comparison with microarray analysis of corresponding human disease samples [111]. These mouse models suggest that human disease may be a combination of genetic predisposition (TNIP1 SNPs) coupled with environmental assault (TLR ligands).

Psoriasis is believed to be a disease of both epithelial cell dysfunction coupled with immune cell over-activation. This mechanism centers around T Helper (Th) 17 cells which secrete IL-17α and IL-22, potent inducers of keratinocyte activation and proliferation [112]. Interestingly, cultured cells experimentally exposed to IL-17a showed increased rates of TNIP1 protein degradation [113]. IL-23 secreted by activated DCs promotes the expansion of already differentiated Th17 cells (from naive CD4+ T cells in the presence of TGFβ, IL-1β, and IL-6) [114, 115]. Increased keratinocyte activation promotes increased chemokine, cytokine, and antimicrobial peptide secretion resulting in increased DC activation leading to increased IL-23 which promotes Th17 proliferation leading to subsequent keratinocyte activation and completing the cycle (Figure 2) [112, 116]. Most of the mechanistic understanding of psoriasis is in the propagation and worsening of the disease state. Still lacking is an understanding of what promotes initiation of the disease. One proposed mechanism for initiation begins with external stimuli such as microbial infections or physical trauma leading to RNA/DNA-LL-37 (antimicrobial peptide) complex formation and internalization by circulating pDCs, where it acts as an agonist for endosomal TLRs 7 and 9, resulting in IFNα secretion. IFNα expression promotes DC activation which would allow for antigen presentation, T cell differentiation, etc. [106]. Under normal conditions, this would lead to an appropriate immune response and activation. Under conditions with genetic polymorphisms in PSORS1, IL-23R, A20, TNIP1, and/or other genes implicated in association studies, this response may become exaggerated. Our group and others have shown that TNIP1 reduction alone does not promote a chronic hyperinflammatory state [38, 40]. However, when coupled with an external stimulus, there is a clear exaggerated response [38, 40]. Thus, keratinocytes deficient for TNIP1 may contribute to hyperactivation of local immune responses when exposed to TLR environment- or skin cell-derived agonists.

For studies of cell signaling in a psoriasis-relevant model, Callahan et al. used CD11c-Cre LoxP system to engineer a TNIP1 DC-specific knockout [103]. When exposed to TLR ligands, these mice developed splenomegaly and lymphadenopathy with an accumulation of myeloid cells suggesting a systemic activation of the immune system, as previously observed in the whole mouse TNIP1 knockout [41, 96]. Topical exposure to IMQ, a TLR7 ligand, instigated a higher overall psoriasis phenotype score (higher levels of epidermal hyperplasia, hypogranulosis, hyperparakeratosis, and epidermal neutrophil infiltration) compared to control animals. BMDC from these mice when treated with TLR ligands (IMQ, LPS) showed increased secretion of immune cytokines including IL-23, an interleukin considered critical in psoriasis development due to its ability to induce Th17 cell proliferation. Ippagunta et al., confirmed this finding using BMDC from TNIP1 knockout mice. They also demonstrated the importance of TNIP-mediated regulation of TLRs in T cell and nonimmune cell (keratinocytes, fibroblasts) mediated immunity [111]. Using keratinocyte-specific TNIP1 knockout mice, these investigators demonstrated that keratinocyte-initiated immune signaling, through the IMQ-induced expression of numerous cytokines, antimicrobial peptides, and chemokines, can induce psoriasis-like disease. Thus, for several immune and nonimmune cell types, these studies demonstrate the importance of TNIP1 control over internal signaling pathways and also external paracrine interactions among them (Figure 2).

4.3. Systemic Sclerosis (Scleroderma)

The etiology, clinical pathology, and cell biology of systemic sclerosis (SSc) lead to multicell signaling interactions coming together to trigger micro-vascular damage, inflammatory signal production, and cardiac, pulmonary, and dermal fibrotic responses [117]. Prevalence of SSc cases (~14 per 100,000 persons) can vary significantly as there appear to be significant disease subtype, gender, age, race, and ethnic group qualifiers [118, 119]. While thickening, hardening, and tightening of the skin are classic and common in most presentations, it is a decline in internal organ function, such as the lungs and gastrointestinal tract from local vasculopathy and excess extracellular matrix deposition that most significantly promotes disease morbidity and mortality [120–122].

Familial and epidemiologic studies provide clear genetic associations between SSc and HLA [117, 123–125] and non-HLA loci which are often in-common for other autoimmune pathologies [126]. Three separate reports have added TNIP1 to these non-HLA loci [17, 18, 127]. Like many pathology-associated SNPs, TNIP1 sequence variations associated with SSc to date are in noncoding sequences (intronic and potential genetic expression-regulatory regions). Interestingly, three other proteins with proven physical interaction with and/or signaling regulatory control by TNIP1 are implicated in SSc by GWAS reports suggesting their mutual contribution to relevant pathways. A PPARγ SNP [128, 129] is associated with SSc, and we previously established TNIP1 as a nuclear corepressor of PPARα and γ activity [45]. At least three SNPs of the TNIP1 cytoplasmic binding partner TNFAIP3 (A20) carry an increase for susceptibility to SSc [117, 130–132]. Additionally, the SNP resulting in an amino acid substitution (Pro631His) in TLR2 is associated with increased progression of SSc-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension [133, 134]. Thus, even when not a genetic variant itself, signal control/initiation node (s) (TNFAIP3, TLR, and PPAR) impacted by TNIP1 may be contributory to SSc.

In addition to genetic sequence variants for the TNIP1 pathway-associated proteins TLR and TNFAIP3, several functional and expression levels studies have linked their normal counterparts to SSc. In part because of the relative clinical accessibility of cutaneous biopsies compared to internal organ sampling, these studies may be biased to dermal fibroblast characteristics. Nevertheless, several studies have found expression of TLR9 [135] and TLR4 as well as endogenous ligands for the latter [136–138] increased in SSc lesion specimens. Fibroblasts cultured from SSc skin biopsy explants displayed a degree of TLR3 expression induction by interferon greater than control cells. Additionally, SSc lesion-derived dermal fibroblasts, under otherwise standard culture, demonstrated a sensitivity to the TLR3 synthetic ligand poly (I:C) greater than control fibroblasts [139]. The full spectrum of TLR in multiple cell types and their demonstrated or possible involvement in SSc has been comprehensively reviewed by Fullard, Bhattacharyya, and colleagues [136, 140]. Thus, deficiency or dysfunction in TNIP1-adjacent proteins such as its functional partner TNFAIP3 (A20) or excess upstream signaling initiated by sensors of innate immune system activity such as TLR may overwhelm the signaling-dampening abilities of TNIP1 [134, 141].

Intriguingly, following up on TNIP1 SSc SNPs [18], Allanore and colleagues reported that compared to skin samples derived from age- and sex-matched healthy controls, the TNIP1 protein was decreased in SSc lesional skin. Separate expression array studies [142] support reduced TNIP1 in lesional skin compared to patient uninvolved skin. Cultured SSc patient dermal fibroblasts [18] have reduced TNIP1 mRNA and protein. These SSc fibroblasts produced elevated levels of collagen in response to cytokine challenge (TNF). Strikingly, this could be abrogated by extracellular TNIP1 protein. This effect would have had to be through an unknown mechanism versus characterized intracellular signaling repression by TNIP1. There is no known or predicted cell-penetrating peptide-like region for cellular reentry of TNIP1. Other reports and our publications established cytoplasmic and nuclear compartmentalization for TNIP1 from endogenous and transfected cDNA expression studies [12, 43]. Nevertheless, the studies establishing the TNIP1-SSc genetic association and/or the reduced TNIP1 expression levels in SSc samples [17, 18, 127, 142] are consistent with and supportive of TNIP1 as a key suppressor of pathways driving a fibrotic signaling whether intrinsic to the fibroblast or in a paracrine fashion where TNIP1 deficiency or defective function in associated epithelial cell (e.g., skin keratinocytes) could make these otherwise protective cells a source of fibroblast-activating cytokines.

5. TNIP1 in Autoimmunity: Summary

Based on the studies of TNIP1 deficiency across a broad spectrum of cell types, including immune cells (DCs, B cells, and T cells) and nonimmune cells (keratinocytes and fibroblasts), it is clear that the loss of TNIP1 expression through knockout or knock-in functional mutations leads to a predisposition for development of autoimmunity. GWAS studies predict this predisposition in human populations through multiple recognized SNPs in TNIP1 genes in patients with autoimmune diseases. Not only does TNIP1 loss or deficiency promotes a hyperinflammatory state, this phenotype closely mimics autoimmune diseases present in human populations. Because of this, manipulation of TNIP1 expression or function can be a useful tool in modeling autoimmunity in mice for the development of drugs and therapies. One fundamental question remaining in autoimmune disease pathogenesis is the cause and initiation of the disease. Through the TNIP1 autoimmune models, it is clear that the potential for TLR stimulation via microbial invasion, cell damage due to wounding, etc. is the first step in pathogenesis. More specifically, this step is described by an exaggerated stimulation of TLRs due to the loss of negative regulation by TNIP1 downstream of receptor activation. With its key regulatory control over multiple signal initiators or pathways, further research on TNIP1 could advance it from association with several autoimmune diseases to a mechanistic contributor to the pathology, and possibly, ultimately, a therapeutic target.

6. Conclusions and Future Directions

(i)The vast majority of autoimmune diseases does not stem from single gene defects and are likely influenced by multiple genes [143] and environmental factors [144] that can promote body-wide and/or tissue-specific autoinflammatory reactions. From human genetic studies, animal models, and in vitro experiments, it would appear that loss, reduction, or dysfunction TNIP1 has the potential to be one of these defects.(ii)With significant negative side-effects of current autoimmune disease therapies, there is a pressing need to develop safer treatments through research into mechanisms underlying these disorders. As highlighted in this review, TNIP1 protein function, as a repressor of signaling downstream from TLR implicated in several autoimmune diseases, could be a pharmacologic target of new therapies.(iii)While likely relevant to hyperactive inflammatory signaling in several autoimmune diseases, the experimental loss or reduction of TNIP1 presents as its own phenotype and does not fully recapitulate any one specific pathology. Nevertheless, the predisposition towards hyperinflammatory reactions of multiple cell types with defective TNIP1 function is likely to provide advantageous insights to further study of tissue-specific and whole animal autoimmune disease models as well as testing of new anti-inflammatory therapies.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest for this article.

Authors’ Contributions

RS and BJA conceived the review topic and both participated in the literature retrieval, data analysis, and review writing. Both authors read and approved the final content.

Acknowledgments

Cited published work of the authors was supported in part by prior Pfizer ASPIRE Investigator-Initiated Research and NIH (AR048660) grants (BJA) and Department of Pharmaceutical Science Graduate Student Assistantship (RS). The authors appreciate their discussions with Dr. S. Rudraiah regarding cell-specific signaling. RS is grateful to Dr. A. Hubbard for constructive comments on early writing that contributed to this document.

References

G. S. Cooper, M. L. K. Bynum, and E. C. Somers, “Recent insights in the epidemiology of autoimmune diseases: improved prevalence estimates and understanding of clustering of diseases,” Journal of Autoimmunity, vol. 33, no. 3-4, pp. 197–207, 2009.

A. Marson, W. J. Housley, and D. A. Hafler, “Genetic basis of autoimmunity,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 125, no. 6, pp. 2234–2241, 2015.

US Department of Health and Human Services, NIH progress in autoimmune diseases research, National Institutes of Health, 2005, Publication No. 05-514.

A. Lerner, P. Jeremias, and T. Matthias, “The world incidence and prevalence of autoimmune diseases is increasing,” International Journal of Celiac Disease, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 151–155, 2015.

S. J. Walsh and L. M. Rau, “Autoimmune diseases: a leading cause of death among young and middle-aged women in the United States,” American Journal of Public Health, vol. 90, no. 9, pp. 1463–1466, 2000.

P. S. Ramos, L. A. Criswell, K. L. Moser et al., “A comprehensive analysis of shared loci between systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and sixteen autoimmune diseases reveals limited genetic overlap,” PLoS Genetics, vol. 7, no. 12, article e1002406, 2011.

S. Jorg, D. A. Grohme, M. Erzler et al., “Environmental factors in autoimmune diseases and their role in multiple sclerosis,” Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, vol. 73, no. 24, pp. 4611–4622, 2016.

M. Gutierrez-Arcelus, S. S. Rich, and S. Raychaudhuri, “Autoimmune diseases–connecting risk alleles with molecular traits of the immune system,” Nature Reviews Genetics, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 160–174, 2016.

M. D. Rosenblum, I. K. Gratz, J. S. Paw, and A. K. Abbas, “Treating human autoimmunity: current practice and future prospects,” Science Translational Medicine, vol. 4, no. 125, article 125sr1, 2012.

K. Heyninck, D. de Valck, W. V. Berghe et al., “The zinc finger protein A20 inhibits TNF-induced NF-κB–dependent gene expression by interfering with an RIP- or TRAF2-mediated transactivation signal and directly binds to a novel NF-κB–inhibiting protein ABIN,” The Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 145, no. 7, pp. 1471–1482, 1999.

M. Fukushi, J. Dixon, T. Kimura, N. Tsurutani, M. J. Dixon, and N. Yamamoto, “Identification and cloning of a novel cellular protein Naf 1, Nef-associated factor 1, that increases cell surface CD4 expression,” FEBS Letters, vol. 442, no. 1, pp. 83–88, 1999.

K. Gupta, D. Ott, T. J. Hope, R. F. Siliciano, and J. D. Boeke, “A human nuclear shuttling protein that interacts with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 matrix is packaged into virions,” Journal of Virology, vol. 74, no. 24, pp. 11811–11824, 2000.

V. Chandran, “The genetics of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis,” Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 149–156, 2013.

Q. Yang, H. Liu, L. Qu et al., “Investigation of 20 non-HLA (human leucocyte antigen) psoriasis susceptibility loci in Chinese patients with psoriatic arthritis and psoriasis vulgaris,” The British Journal of Dermatology, vol. 168, no. 5, pp. 1060–1065, 2013.

E. Ellinghaus, P. E. Stuart, D. Ellinghaus et al., “Genome-wide meta-analysis of psoriatic arthritis identifies susceptibility locus at REL,” The Journal of Investigative Dermatology, vol. 132, no. 4, pp. 1133–1140, 2012.

J. Bowes, G. Orozco, E. Flynn et al., “Confirmation of TNIP1 and IL23A as susceptibility loci for psoriatic arthritis,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 70, no. 9, pp. 1641–1644, 2011.

L. Bossini-Castillo, J. E. Martin, J. Broen et al., “Confirmation of TNIP1 but not RHOB and PSORS1C1 as systemic sclerosis risk factors in a large independent replication study,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 72, no. 4, pp. 602–607, 2013.

Y. Allanore, M. Saad, P. Dieudé et al., “Genome-wide scan identifies TNIP1, PSORS1C1, and RHOB as novel risk loci for systemic sclerosis,” PLoS Genetics, vol. 7, no. 7, article e1002091, 2011.

V. Gateva, J. K. Sandling, G. Hom et al., “A large-scale replication study identifies TNIP1, PRDM1, JAZF1, UHRF1BP1 and IL10 as risk loci for systemic lupus erythematosus,” Nature Genetics, vol. 41, no. 11, pp. 1228–1233, 2009.

J. W. Han, H. F. Zheng, Y. Cui et al., “Genome-wide association study in a Chinese Han population identifies nine new susceptibility loci for systemic lupus erythematosus,” Nature Genetics, vol. 41, no. 11, pp. 1234–1237, 2009.

H. Cen, M. Zhou, R. X. Leng et al., “Genetic interaction between genes involved in NF-κB signaling pathway in systemic lupus erythematosus,” Molecular Immunology, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 643–648, 2013.

C. F. He, Y. S. Liu, Y. L. Cheng et al., “TNIP1, SLC15A4, ETS1, RasGRP3 and IKZF1 are associated with clinical features of systemic lupus erythematosus in a Chinese Han population,” Lupus, vol. 19, no. 10, pp. 1181–1186, 2010.

A. Kawasaki, S. Ito, H. Furukawa et al., “Association of TNFAIP3 interacting protein 1, TNIP1 with systemic lupus erythematosus in a Japanese population: a case-control association study,” Arthritis Research & Therapy, vol. 12, no. 5, p. R174, 2010.

I. Adrianto, S. Wang, G. B. Wiley et al., “Association of two independent functional risk haplotypes in TNIP1 with systemic lupus erythematosus,” Arthritis & Rheumatism, vol. 64, no. 11, pp. 3695–3705, 2012.

L. D. Sun, H. Cheng, Z. X. Wang et al., “Association analyses identify six new psoriasis susceptibility loci in the Chinese population,” Nature Genetics, vol. 42, no. 11, pp. 1005–1009, 2010.

R. P. Nair, K. C. Duffin, C. Helms et al., “Genome-wide scan reveals association of psoriasis with IL-23 and NF-κB pathways,” Nature Genetics, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 199–204, 2009.

L. C. Tsoi, S. L. Spain, J. Knight et al., “Identification of 15 new psoriasis susceptibility loci highlights the role of innate immunity,” Nature Genetics, vol. 44, no. 12, pp. 1341–1348, 2012.

C. F. Kuo, M. J. Grainge, A. M. Valdes et al., “Familial aggregation of systemic lupus erythematosus and coaggregation of autoimmune diseases in affected families,” JAMA Internal Medicine, vol. 175, no. 9, pp. 1518–1526, 2015.

E. M. Farber and L. Nall, “The natural history of psoriasis in 5,600 patients,” Dermatologica, vol. 148, no. 1, pp. 1–18, 1974.

L. A. Hindorff, P. Sethupathy, H. A. Junkins et al., “Potential etiologic and functional implications of genome-wide association loci for human diseases and traits,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 106, no. 23, pp. 9362–9367, 2009.

R. Hunt, Z. E. Sauna, S. V. Ambudkar, M. M. Gottesman, and C. Kimchi-Sarfaty, “Silent (synonymous) SNPs: should we care about them?” Methods in Molecular Biology, vol. 578, pp. 23–39, 2009.

A. O. Olarerin-George, L. Anton, Y. C. Hwang, M. A. Elovitz, and J. B. Hogenesch, “A functional genomics screen for microRNA regulators of NF-kappaB signaling,” BMC Biology, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 19, 2013.

J. Gallagher, J. Howlin, C. McCarthy et al., “Identification of Naf1/ABIN-1 among TNF-α-induced expressed genes in human synoviocytes using oligonucleotide microarrays,” FEBS Letters, vol. 551, no. 1–3, pp. 8–12, 2003.

M. Imbeault, M. Ouellet, K. Giguere et al., “Acquisition of host-derived CD40L by HIV-1 in vivo and its functional consequences in the B-cell compartment,” Journal of Virology, vol. 85, no. 5, pp. 2189–2200, 2011.

I. Gurevich, C. Zhang, P. C. Encarnacao, C. P. Struzynski, S. E. Livings, and B. J. Aneskievich, “PPARγ and NF-κB regulate the gene promoter activity of their shared repressor, TNIP1,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Gene Regulatory Mechanisms, vol. 1819, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2012.

B. Tian, D. E. Nowak, M. Jamaluddin, S. Wang, and A. R. Brasier, “Identification of direct genomic targets downstream of the nuclear factor-κB transcription factor mediating tumor necrosis factor signaling,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 280, no. 17, pp. 17435–17448, 2005.

G. Martin, J. Roy, C. Barat, M. Ouellet, C. Gilbert, and M. J. Tremblay, “Human immunodeficiency virus type 1-associated CD40 ligand transactivates B lymphocytes and promotes infection of CD4+ T cells,” Journal of Virology, vol. 81, no. 11, pp. 5872–5881, 2007.

Y. Chen, H. Yan, Z. Song et al., “Downregulation of TNIP1 expression leads to increased proliferation of human keratinocytes and severer psoriasis-like conditions in an imiquimod-induced mouse model of dermatitis,” PloS One, vol. 10, no. 6, article e0127957, 2015.

V. P. Ramirez, W. Krueger, and B. J. Aneskievich, “TNIP1 reduction of HSPA6 gene expression occurs in promoter regions lacking binding sites for known TNIP1-repressed transcription factors,” Gene, vol. 555, no. 2, pp. 430–437, 2015.

S. Rudraiah, R. Shamilov, and B. J. Aneskievich, “TNIP1 reduction sensitizes keratinocytes to post-receptor signalling following exposure to TLR agonists,” Cellular Signalling, vol. 45, pp. 81–92, 2018.

S. Oshima, E. E. Turer, J. A. Callahan et al., “ABIN-1 is a ubiquitin sensor that restricts cell death and sustains embryonic development,” Nature, vol. 458, no. 7237, pp. 538–909, 2009.

S. K. Nanda, R. K. C. Venigalla, A. Ordureau et al., “Polyubiquitin binding to ABIN1 is required to prevent autoimmunity,” The Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 208, no. 6, pp. 1215–1228, 2011.

I. Gurevich, C. Zhang, N. Francis, and B. J. Aneskievich, “TNIP1, a retinoic acid receptor corepressor and A20-binding inhibitor of NF-κB, distributes to both nuclear and cytoplasmic locations,” Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry, vol. 59, no. 12, pp. 1101–1112, 2011.

I. Gurevich and B. J. Aneskievich, “Liganded RARalpha and RARgamma interact with but are repressed by TNIP1,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 389, no. 3, pp. 409–414, 2009.

A. M. Flores, I. Gurevich, C. Zhang, V. P. Ramirez, T. R. Devens, and B. J. Aneskievich, “TNIP1 is a corepressor of agonist-bound PPARs,” Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, vol. 516, no. 1, pp. 58–66, 2011.

L. Huang, L. Verstrepen, K. Heyninck et al., “ABINs inhibit EGF receptor-mediated NF-κB activation and growth of EGF receptor-overexpressing tumour cells,” Oncogene, vol. 27, no. 47, pp. 6131–6140, 2008.

L. Catrysse, L. Vereecke, R. Beyaert, and G. van Loo, “A20 in inflammation and autoimmunity,” Trends in Immunology, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 22–31, 2014.

K. Heyninck, M. M. Kreike, and R. Beyaert, “Structure-function analysis of the A20-binding inhibitor of NF-kappa B activation, ABIN-1,” FEBS Letters, vol. 536, no. 1–3, pp. 135–140, 2003.

P. C. Evans, H. Ovaa, M. Hamon et al., “Zinc-finger protein A20, a regulator of inflammation and cell survival, has de-ubiquitinating activity,” The Biochemical Journal, vol. 378, no. 3, pp. 727–734, 2004.

D. L. Boone, E. E. Turer, E. G. Lee et al., “The ubiquitin-modifying enzyme A20 is required for termination of Toll-like receptor responses,” Nature Immunology, vol. 5, no. 10, pp. 1052–1060, 2004.

C. J. Wu, D. B. Conze, T. Li, S. M. Srinivasula, and J. D. Ashwell, “Sensing of Lys 63-linked polyubiquitination by NEMO is a key event in NF-κB activation,” Nature Cell Biology, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 398–406, 2006.

S. Rahighi, F. Ikeda, M. Kawasaki et al., “Specific recognition of linear ubiquitin chains by NEMO is important for NF-κB activation,” Cell, vol. 136, no. 6, pp. 1098–1109, 2009.

H. Zhou, I. Wertz, K. O'Rourke et al., “Bcl10 activates the NF-κB pathway through ubiquitination of NEMO,” Nature, vol. 427, no. 6970, pp. 167–171, 2004.

C. H. Emmerich, A. Ordureau, S. Strickson et al., “Activation of the canonical IKK complex by K63/M1-linked hybrid ubiquitin chains,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 110, no. 38, pp. 15247–15252, 2013.

A. Richmond, “Nf-kappa B, chemokine gene transcription and tumour growth,” Nature Reviews Immunology, vol. 2, no. 9, pp. 664–674, 2002.

C. Mauro, F. Pacifico, A. Lavorgna et al., “ABIN-1 Binds to NEMO/IKKγ and co-operates with A20 in Inhibiting NF-κB,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 281, no. 27, pp. 18482–18488, 2006.

A. De, T. Dainichi, C. V. Rathinam, and S. Ghosh, “The deubiquitinase activity of A20 is dispensable for NF-κB signaling,” EMBO Reports, vol. 15, no. 7, pp. 775–783, 2014.

M. G. Kattah, L. Shao, Y. Y. Rosli et al., “A20 and ABIN-1 synergistically preserve intestinal epithelial cell survival,” The Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 215, no. 7, pp. 1839–1852, 2018.

L. Gao, H. Coope, S. Grant, A. Ma, S. C. Ley, and E. W. Harhaj, “ABIN1 protein cooperates with TAX1BP1 and A20 proteins to inhibit antiviral signaling,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 286, no. 42, pp. 36592–36602, 2011.

E. Meylan, K. Burns, K. Hofmann et al., “RIP1 is an essential mediator of Toll-like receptor 3-induced NF-kappa B activation,” Nature Immunology, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 503–507, 2004.

M. A. O'Donnell, D. Legarda-Addison, P. Skountzos, W. C. Yeh, and A. T. Ting, “Ubiquitination of RIP1 regulates an NF-κB-independent cell-death switch in TNF signaling,” Current Biology: CB, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 418–424, 2007.

S. A. Dziedzic, Z. Su, V. Jean Barrett et al., “ABIN-1 regulates RIPK1 activation by linking Met 1 ubiquitylation with Lys 63 deubiquitylation in TNF-RSC,” Nature Cell Biology, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 58–68, 2018.

D. Komander and M. Rape, “The ubiquitin code,” Annual Review of Biochemistry, vol. 81, no. 1, pp. 203–229, 2012.

S. Akira, S. Uematsu, and O. Takeuchi, “Pathogen recognition and innate immunity,” Cell, vol. 124, no. 4, pp. 783–801, 2006.

C. Yao, J. H. Oh, D. H. Lee et al., “Toll-like receptor family members in skin fibroblasts are functional and have a higher expression compared to skin keratinocytes,” International Journal of Molecular Medicine, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 1443–1450, 2015.

C. A. Janeway Jr. and R. Medzhitov, “Innate immune recognition,” Annual Review of Immunology, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 197–216, 2002.

D. Tang, R. Kang, C. B. Coyne, H. J. Zeh, and M. T. Lotze, “PAMPs and DAMPs: signal 0s that spur autophagy and immunity,” Immunological Reviews, vol. 249, no. 1, pp. 158–175, 2012.

I. Botos, D. M. Segal, and D. R. Davies, “The structural biology of Toll-like receptors,” Structure, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 447–459, 2011.

H. Kumar, T. Kawai, and S. Akira, “Toll-like receptors and innate immunity,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 388, no. 4, pp. 621–625, 2009.

C. A. Scanga, J. Aliberti, D. Jankovic et al., “Cutting edge: MyD88 is required for resistance to Toxoplasma gondii infection and regulates parasite-induced IL-12 production by dendritic cells,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 168, no. 12, pp. 5997–6001, 2002.

O. Takeuchi, K. Hoshino, and S. Akira, “Cutting edge: TLR2-deficient and MyD88-deficient mice are highly susceptible to Staphylococcus aureus infection,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 165, no. 10, pp. 5392–5396, 2000.

H. von Bernuth, C. Picard, Z. Jin et al., “Pyogenic bacterial infections in humans with MyD88 deficiency,” Science, vol. 321, no. 5889, pp. 691–696, 2008.

S. C. Lin, Y. C. Lo, and H. Wu, “Helical assembly in the MyD88-IRAK4-IRAK2 complex in TLR/IL-1R signalling,” Nature, vol. 465, no. 7300, pp. 885–890, 2010.

D. Chaudhary, S. Robinson, and D. L. Romero, “Recent advances in the discovery of small molecule inhibitors of interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase 4 (IRAK4) as a therapeutic target for inflammation and oncology disorders,” Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 96–110, 2015.

A. Kanayama, R. B. Seth, L. Sun et al., “TAB2 and TAB3 activate the NF-κB pathway through binding to polyubiquitin chains,” Molecular Cell, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 535–548, 2004.

F. Tokunaga, S. I. Sakata, Y. Saeki et al., “Involvement of linear polyubiquitylation of NEMO in NF-κB activation,” Nature Cell Biology, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 123–132, 2009.

M. Bao and Y. J. Liu, “Regulation of TLR7/9 signaling in plasmacytoid dendritic cells,” Protein & Cell, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 40–52, 2013.

M. Yamamoto, S. Sato, H. Hemmi et al., “Role of adaptor TRIF in the MyD88-independent toll-like receptor signaling pathway,” Science, vol. 301, no. 5633, pp. 640–643, 2003.

J. Siednienko, T. Gajanayake, K. A. Fitzgerald, P. Moynagh, and S. M. Miggin, “Absence of MyD88 results in enhanced TLR3-dependent phosphorylation of IRF3 and increased IFN-β and RANTES production,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 186, no. 4, pp. 2514–2522, 2011.

A. Witt and D. Vucic, “Diverse ubiquitin linkages regulate RIP kinases-mediated inflammatory and cell death signaling,” Cell Death and Differentiation, vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 1160–1171, 2017.

Z. Jiang, T. W. Mak, G. Sen, and X. Li, “Toll-like receptor 3-mediated activation of NF-κB and IRF3 diverges at Toll-IL-1 receptor domain-containing adapter inducing IFN-β,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 101, no. 10, pp. 3533–3538, 2004.

T. R. Reksten, C. J. Lessard, and K. L. Sivils, “Genetics in Sjögren syndrome,” Rheumatic Diseases Clinics of North America, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 435–447, 2016.

A. Sukhov, I. E. Adamopoulos, and E. Maverakis, “Interactions of the immune system with skin and bone tissue in psoriatic arthritis: a comprehensive review,” Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 87–99, 2016.

N. Kadowaki, S. Ho, S. Antonenko et al., “Subsets of human dendritic cell precursors express different toll-like receptors and respond to different microbial antigens,” The Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 194, no. 6, pp. 863–870, 2001.

J. J. Hooks, G. W. Jordan, T. Cupps, H. M. Moutsopoulos, A. S. Fauci, and A. L. Notkins, “Multiple interferons in the circulation of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and vasculitis,” Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 396–400, 1982.

C. Gota and L. Calabrese, “Induction of clinical autoimmune disease by therapeutic interferon-α,” Autoimmunity, vol. 36, no. 8, pp. 511–518, 2003.

S. Akira and H. Hemmi, “Recognition of pathogen-associated molecular patterns by TLR family,” Immunology Letters, vol. 85, no. 2, pp. 85–95, 2003.

B. A. Cocca, A. M. Cline, and M. Z. Radic, “Blebs and apoptotic bodies are B cell autoantigens,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 169, no. 1, pp. 159–166, 2002.

W. G. J. Degen, G. J. M. Pruijn, J. M. H. Raats, and W. J. van Venrooij, “Caspase-dependent cleavage of nucleic acids,” Cell Death & Differentiation, vol. 7, no. 7, pp. 616–627, 2000.

M. W. Boule, C. Broughton, F. Mackay, S. Akira, A. Marshak-Rothstein, and I. R. Rifkin, “Toll-like receptor 9-dependent and -independent dendritic cell activation by chromatin-immunoglobulin G complexes,” The Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 199, no. 12, pp. 1631–1640, 2004.

T. Lovgren, M. L. Eloranta, U. Bave, G. V. Alm, and L. Ronnblom, “Induction of interferon-alpha production in plasmacytoid dendritic cells by immune complexes containing nucleic acid released by necrotic or late apoptotic cells and lupus IgG,” Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 1861–1872, 2004.

P. Decker, H. Singh-Jasuja, S. Haager, I. Kotter, and H. G. Rammensee, “Nucleosome, the main autoantigen in systemic lupus erythematosus, induces direct dendritic cell activation via a MyD88-independent pathway: consequences on inflammation,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 174, no. 6, pp. 3326–3334, 2005.

E. Savarese, O. W. Chae, S. Trowitzsch et al., “U1 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein immune complexes induce type I interferon in plasmacytoid dendritic cells through TLR7,” Blood, vol. 107, no. 8, pp. 3229–3234, 2006.

J. A. Deane, P. Pisitkun, R. S. Barrett et al., “Control of toll-like receptor 7 expression is essential to restrict autoimmunity and dendritic cell proliferation,” Immunity, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 801–810, 2007.

D. L. Thibault Flesher, X. Sun, T. W. Behrens, R. R. Graham, and L. A. Criswell, “Recent advances in the genetics of systemic lupus erythematosus,” Expert Review of Clinical Immunology, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 461–479, 2014.

J. Zhou, R. Wu, A. A. High et al., “A20-binding inhibitor of NF-κB (ABIN1) controls Toll-like receptor-mediated CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein β activation and protects from inflammatory disease,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 108, no. 44, pp. E998–1006, 2011.

C. Lood, H. Tyden, B. Gullstrand et al., “Platelet-derived S100A8/A9 and cardiovascular disease in systemic lupus erythematosus,” Arthritis & Rheumatology, vol. 68, no. 8, pp. 1970–1980, 2016.

E. A. Korte, D. J. Caster, M. T. Barati et al., “ABIN1 determines severity of glomerulonephritis via activation of intrinsic glomerular inflammation,” The American Journal of Pathology, vol. 187, no. 12, pp. 2799–2810, 2017.

S. K. Nanda, M. Lopez-Pelaez, J. S. C. Arthur, F. Marchesi, and P. Cohen, “Suppression of IRAK1 or IRAK4 catalytic activity, but not type 1 IFN signaling, prevents lupus nephritis in mice expressing a ubiquitin binding–defective mutant of ABIN1,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 197, no. 11, pp. 4266–4273, 2016.

R. T. G'Sell, P. M. Gaffney, and D. W. Powell, “Review: A20-binding inhibitor of NF-κB activation 1 is a physiologic inhibitor of NF-κB: a molecular switch for inflammation and autoimmunity,” Arthritis & Rheumatology, vol. 67, no. 9, pp. 2292–2302, 2015.

V. P. Ramirez, I. Gurevich, and B. J. Aneskievich, “Emerging roles for TNIP1 in regulating post-receptor signaling,” Cytokine & Growth Factor Reviews, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 109–118, 2012.

L. Verstrepen, I. Carpentier, and R. Beyaert, “The biology of A20-binding inhibitors of NF-kappaB activation (ABINs),” Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol. 809, pp. 13–31, 2014.

J. A. Callahan, G. E. Hammer, A. Agelides et al., “Cutting edge: ABIN-1 protects against psoriasis by restricting MyD88 signals in dendritic cells,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 191, no. 2, pp. 535–539, 2013.

C. Y. Lu, P. D. Winterberg, J. Chen, and J. R. Hartono, “Acute kidney injury: a conspiracy of Toll-like receptor 4 on endothelia, leukocytes, and tubules,” Pediatric Nephrology, vol. 27, no. 10, pp. 1847–1854, 2012.

T. Doetschman, “Influence of genetic background on genetically engineered mouse phenotypes,” in Gene Knockout Protocols, W. Wurst and R. Kühn, Eds., vol. 530 of Methods in Molecular Biology, pp. 423–433, 2009.

F. O. Nestle, D. H. Kaplan, and J. Barker, “Psoriasis,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 361, no. 5, pp. 496–509, 2009.

S. Kagami, H. L. Rizzo, J. J. Lee, Y. Koguchi, and A. Blauvelt, “Circulating Th17, Th22, and Th1 cells are increased in psoriasis,” The Journal of Investigative Dermatology, vol. 130, no. 5, pp. 1373–1383, 2010.

F. Capon, P. Di Meglio, J. Szaub et al., “Sequence variants in the genes for the interleukin-23 receptor (IL23R) and its ligand (IL12B) confer protection against psoriasis,” Human Genetics, vol. 122, no. 2, pp. 201–206, 2007.

M. Cargill, S. J. Schrodi, M. Chang et al., “A large-scale genetic association study confirms IL12B and leads to the identification of IL23R as psoriasis-risk genes,” American Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 80, no. 2, pp. 273–290, 2007.

L. van der Fits, S. Mourits, J. S. A. Voerman et al., “Imiquimod-induced psoriasis-like skin inflammation in mice is mediated via the IL-23/IL-17 axis,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 182, no. 9, pp. 5836–5845, 2009.

S. K. Ippagunta, R. Gangwar, D. Finkelstein et al., “Keratinocytes contribute intrinsically to psoriasis upon loss of Tnip 1 function,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 113, no. 41, pp. E6162–E6171, 2016.

A. Di Cesare, P. Di Meglio, and F. O. Nestle, “The IL-23/Th17 axis in the immunopathogenesis of psoriasis,” The Journal of Investigative Dermatology, vol. 129, no. 6, pp. 1339–1350, 2009.

J. A. Cruz, E. E. Childs, N. Amatya et al., “IL-17 signaling triggers degradation of the constitutive NF-κB inhibitor ABIN-1,” ImmunoHorizons, vol. 1, no. 7, pp. 133–141, 2017.

C. L. Langrish, Y. Chen, W. M. Blumenschein et al., “IL-23 drives a pathogenic T cell population that induces autoimmune inflammation,” The Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 201, no. 2, pp. 233–240, 2005.

L. Grine, L. Dejager, C. Libert, and R. E. Vandenbroucke, “An inflammatory triangle in psoriasis: TNF, type I IFNs and IL-17,” Cytokine & Growth Factor Reviews, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 25–33, 2015.

M. Pasparakis, I. Haase, and F. O. Nestle, “Mechanisms regulating skin immunity and inflammation,” Nature Reviews Immunology, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 289–301, 2014.

D. Pattanaik, M. Brown, B. C. Postlethwaite, and A. E. Postlethwaite, “Pathogenesis of systemic sclerosis,” Frontiers in Immunology, vol. 6, p. 272, 2015.

S. Bernatsky, L. Joseph, C. A. Pineau, P. Belisle, M. Hudson, and A. E. Clarke, “Scleroderma prevalence: demographic variations in a population-based sample,” Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 400–404, 2009.

L. K. Andersen and M. D. P. Davis, “Prevalence of skin and skin-related diseases in the Rochester Epidemiology Project and a comparison with other published prevalence studies,” Dermatology, vol. 232, no. 3, pp. 344–352, 2016.

C. P. Denton and D. Khanna, “Systemic sclerosis,” The Lancet, vol. 390, no. 10103, pp. 1685–1699, 2017.

D. Khanna, J. Seibold, J. Goldin, D. P. Tashkin, D. E. Furst, and A. Wells, “Interstitial lung disease points to consider for clinical trials in systemic sclerosis,” Rheumatology, vol. 56, Supplement_5, pp. v27–v32, 2017.

R. Giacomelli, V. Liakouli, O. Berardicurti et al., “Interstitial lung disease in systemic sclerosis: current and future treatment,” Rheumatology International, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 853–863, 2017.

Y. Luo, Y. Wang, Q. Wang, R. Xiao, and Q. Lu, “Systemic sclerosis: genetics and epigenetics,” Journal of Autoimmunity, vol. 41, pp. 161–167, 2013.

J. E. Martin, L. Bossini-Castillo, and J. Martin, “Unraveling the genetic component of systemic sclerosis,” Human Genetics, vol. 131, no. 7, pp. 1023–1037, 2012.

B. D. Korman and L. A. Criswell, “Recent advances in the genetics of systemic sclerosis: toward biological and clinical significance,” Current Rheumatology Reports, vol. 17, no. 3, p. 21, 2015.

S. Bhattacharyya, K. S. Midwood, H. Yin, and J. Varga, “Toll-like receptor-4 signaling drives persistent fibroblast activation and prevents fibrosis resolution in scleroderma,” Advances in Wound Care, vol. 6, no. 10, pp. 356–369, 2017.

X. Li, E. J. Ampleford, T. D. Howard et al., “Genome-wide association studies of asthma indicate opposite immunopathogenesis direction from autoimmune diseases,” Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, vol. 130, no. 4, pp. 861–868.e7, 2012.

E. López-Isac, L. Bossini-Castillo, C. P. Simeon et al., “A genome-wide association study follow-up suggests a possible role for PPARG in systemic sclerosis susceptibility,” Arthritis Research & Therapy, vol. 16, no. 1, p. R6, 2014.

R. G. Marangoni, B. D. Korman, Y. Allanore et al., “A candidate gene study reveals association between a variant of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPAR-γ) gene and systemic sclerosis,” Arthritis Research & Therapy, vol. 17, no. 1, p. 128, 2015.

J. E. Martin, J. C. Broen, F. D. Carmona et al., “Identification of CSK as a systemic sclerosis genetic risk factor through genome wide association study follow-up,” Human Molecular Genetics, vol. 21, no. 12, pp. 2825–2835, 2012.

E. Koumakis, M. Giraud, P. Dieude et al., “Brief report: candidate gene study in systemic sclerosis identifies a rare and functional variant of the TNFAIP3 locus as a risk factor for polyautoimmunity,” Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 64, no. 8, pp. 2746–2752, 2012.

P. Dieude, M. Guedj, J. Wipff et al., “Association of the TNFAIP3 rs 5029939 variant with systemic sclerosis in the European Caucasian population,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 69, no. 11, pp. 1958–1964, 2010.

J. C. A. Broen, L. Bossini-Castillo, L. van Bon et al., “A rare polymorphism in the gene for Toll-like receptor 2 is associated with systemic sclerosis phenotype and increases the production of inflammatory mediators,” Arthritis & Rheumatism, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 264–271, 2012.

S. Bhattacharyya and J. Varga, “Endogenous ligands of TLR4 promote unresolving tissue fibrosis: implications for systemic sclerosis and its targeted therapy,” Immunology Letters, vol. 195, pp. 9–17, 2018.

F. Fang, R. G. Marangoni, X. Zhou et al., “Toll-like receptor 9 signaling is augmented in systemic sclerosis and elicits transforming growth factor β-dependent fibroblast activation,” Arthritis & Rheumatology, vol. 68, no. 8, pp. 1989–2002, 2016.

S. Bhattacharyya and J. Varga, “Emerging roles of innate immune signaling and toll-like receptors in fibrosis and systemic sclerosis,” Current Rheumatology Reports, vol. 17, no. 1, 2015.

S. Bhattacharyya, K. Kelley, D. S. Melichian et al., “Toll-like receptor 4 signaling augments transforming growth factor-β responses: a novel mechanism for maintaining and amplifying fibrosis in scleroderma,” The American Journal of Pathology, vol. 182, no. 1, pp. 192–205, 2013.

S. Bhattacharyya, Z. Tamaki, W. Wang et al., “FibronectinEDA promotes chronic cutaneous fibrosis through Toll-like receptor signaling,” Science Translational Medicine, vol. 6, no. 232, article 232ra50, 2014.

S. K. Agarwal, M. Wu, C. K. Livingston et al., “Toll-like receptor 3 upregulation by type I interferon in healthy and scleroderma dermal fibroblasts,” Arthritis Research & Therapy, vol. 13, no. 1, p. R3, 2011.

N. Fullard and S. O’Reilly, “Role of innate immune system in systemic sclerosis,” Seminars in Immunopathology, vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 511–517, 2015.

S. Bhattacharyya, W. Wang, L. V. D. Graham, and J. Varga, “A20 suppresses canonical Smad-dependent fibroblast activation: novel function for an endogenous inflammatory modulator,” Arthritis Research & Therapy, vol. 18, no. 1, p. 216, 2016.

A. Milano, S. A. Pendergrass, J. L. Sargent et al., “Molecular subsets in the gene expression signatures of scleroderma skin,” PLoS One, vol. 3, no. 7, article e2696, 2008.

B. Grimbacher, K. Warnatz, P. F. K. Yong, A. S. Korganow, and H. H. Peter, “The crossroads of autoimmunity and immunodeficiency: lessons from polygenic traits and monogenic defects,” Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, vol. 137, no. 1, pp. 3–17, 2016.

A. Vojdani, K. M. Pollard, and A. W. Campbell, “Environmental triggers and autoimmunity,” Autoimmune Diseases, vol. 2014, Article ID 798029, 2 pages, 2014.