Inverse Numerical Iterative Technique for Finding all Roots of Nonlinear Equations with Engineering Applications

We introduce here a new two-step derivate-free inverse simultaneous iterative method for estimating all roots of nonlinear equation. It is proved that convergence order of the newly constructed method is four. Lower bound of the convergence order is determined using Mathematica and verified with theoretical local convergence order of the method introduced. Some nonlinear models which are taken from physical and engineering sciences as numerical test examples to demonstrate the performance and efficiency of the newly constructed modified inverse simultaneous methods as compared to classical methods existing in literature are presented. Dynamical planes and residual graphs are drawn using MATLAB to elaborate efficiency, robustness, and authentication in its domain.


Introduction
A wide range of problems in physical and engineering sciences can be formulated as a nonlinear equation: e most ancient and popular iterative technique for approximating single roots of (1) is Newton's method [1] which has local quadratic convergence: f ′ r (k) , (k � 0, 1, . . .). (2) Nedzibove et al., in [2], presented the inverse method of the same order corresponding to method (2): r (k) f ′ r (k) + f r (k) .
In the last few years, lot of work has been carried out on numerical iterative methods which approximate single root at a time of (1).

Construction of Family of Simultaneous Method for Distinct Roots
We modify the Weierstrass method (4) as follows: where )) and denote it by WDK2. Let us now convert method (7) into inverse iterative method as follows: where us, method (8) is a two-step inverse method abbreviated as IWM2.

Convergence Analysis.
We prove here that convergence order of the IWM2 method is four.
Using eorem 1, we have the following.
us, IWM2 has at least fourth-order convergence.
For simplicity, we omit iteration index k. From first step of IWM2, we have us, we obtain Using the expression n j≠i j�1 If we assume all errors are of the same order, i.e.,

Journal of Mathematics 3
From second-step of IWM2, we have us, we obtain As from the above argument n j≠i j�1 If we assume all errors are of the same order, i.e., Hence, the theorem is proved.

. Using CAS for Verification of Convergence
Order. Consider and the first component of Γ 1 (r) iterative schemes to find zeros of (25), r (k+1) � Γ(r (k) ), simultaneously. In order to verify eorem 2 conditions, we have to express the differential of an operator Γ(r) in terms of their partial derivate of its component as Γ i (r): and so on. e lower bound of the convergence obtained until the first nonzero element of the row is found. e Mathematica code is given for each of the consider methods as follows.
Weierstrass-Dochive Method (WDK): Modified Inverse Weierstrass Method: In [3]: � Simplify D Γ 1 r 1 , r 2 , r 3 , r 1 , r 1 r 1 ⟶ θ, r 2 ⟶ ϕ, r 3 ⟶ φ , WDK2 Method: where u � r − (f(r))/ n j�1 j≠i (r i − r j )), IWM2 Method: Journal of Mathematics where u � (r) n j�1 j≠i In [14] ≔ Simplify D Γ 1 r 1 , r 2 , r 3 , r 1 , r 1 , r 1 , r 1 , (1) Basins of Attraction. To provoke the basins of attraction of iterative schemes WDK, IWDK, WDK2, and IWM2 for the root of nonlinear equation, we execute the real and imaginary parts of the starting approximation as two axes over a mesh of 250 × 250 in complex plane. Using |r (k+1) − r (k) | < 10 − 3 as a stopping criteria and maximum number of iterations as 25. We allow different colors to mark to which root the iterative scheme converges and black in other case. Color brightness in basins shows less number of iterations. For the generation of basins, we consider the following four nonlinear functions, i.e., f 1 (r) � log r + e r + 1 and f 2 (r) � sin((r − 1)/2)cos((r − 3)/2) + 1. e elapsed time from Table 1 and brightness in color in Figure 1(d)-2(d) shows the dominance behavior of IWM2 over WDK, IWDK, and WDK2, respectively. e elapsed time from Table 1 and brightness in color in Figure 2(d) show the dominance behavior of IWM2 over WDK, IWDK, and WDK2, respectively.

Numerical Results
Some nonlinear models from engineering and physical sciences are considered to illustrate the performance and efficiency of WDK2 and IWM2 using CAS Maple 18 with 64 digits floating point arithmetic for all computer calculations. We approximate the roots of (1) rather than the exact roots which depend on computer precision ∈, and the following stopping criteria are used to terminate the computer program: where e i represents the absolute error. We take ∈ � 10 − 30 . In Tables 2-5, CO represents convergence order of iterative schemes WDK2 and IWM2, respectively.

Applications in Engineering.
In this section, we discuss some applications in engineering.
As expression described in [25,26], is the fractional conversion of nitrogen, hydrogen feed at 250 atm. and 227 k. e exact roots of (34) are e initial calculated values of (34) have been taken as follows: Example 2 (see [6]). Van der Waal's Fluid Model.
A Van der Waals fluid is the one which satisfies the equation of state: where R, a, and b are positive constants, P is the pressure, θ is the absolute temperature, and v volume. We obtain a nonlinear equation by setting P � (27b 2 p/a), T � (27Rbθ/8a), and r � (v/3b) Taking P � 6 and T � 2 in (37), we have (40) e exact roots of (40) are (41) e initial calculated values of (40) have been taken as follows: Table 3 clearly shows the dominance behavior of IWM2 over the WDK2 iterative method in terms of CPU time in     Example 3 (see [27]). Continuous Stirred Tank Reactor (CSTR). An isothermal stirred tank reactor (CSTR) is considered here. Items A and R are fed to the reactor at rates of Q and q-Q, respectively. Complex reaction developed in the reactor is given as follows: For a simple feedback control system, this problem was first tested by Douglas (see [28] H c being the gain of the proportional controller. is transfer function yields the following nonlinear equation by taking H c � 0: f 5 (r) � r 4 + 11.50t 3 + 47.49r 2 + 83.06325r + 51.23266875 � 0.
(45) e transfer function has the four negative real roots, i.e., r 1 � − 1.45, r 2 � − 2.85, r 3 � − 2.85, and r 4 � − 4.45 e initial calculated values of (45) have been taken as follows: (46) Table 4 clearly shows the dominance behavior of IWM2 over the WDK2 iterative method in terms of CPU time in seconds and absolute error on same number of iterations k for nonlinear function f 5 (r).
Consider the Predator-Prey model in which the predation rate is denoted by where r is the number of aphids as preys [6] and lady bugs as a predator. Obeying the Mathusian Model, the growth rate of aphids is defined as G(r) � r * 1 r, r * 1 > 0. To find the solution of the problem, we take the aphid density for which P(r) � G(r) implies Taking k � 30 (aphids eaten rate), a � 20 (number of aphids), and r * 1 � 2 (− 1/3) (rate per hour) in (48), we obtain e initial estimates for f 6 (r) has been taken as follows: Table 5 clearly shows the dominance behavior of IWM2 over WDK2 iterative method in terms of CPU time in seconds and absolute error on the same number of iterations k for nonlinear function f 6 (r).

Conclusion
In this work, new two-step derivative-free inverse iterative methods of convergence order 4 for the simultaneous approximations of all roots of a nonlinear equation (1) are introduced and discussed. Dynamical planes and basins of attraction are presented to show the global convergence behavior of inverse simultaneous iterative methods and twostep classical Weierstrass method. Brightness in color in the dynamical planes of IWM2 shows less number of iteration steps as compared to classical simultaneous methods WDK2 for finding all roots of (1).
e results of numerical test examples from Tables 2-5, CPU time from Figure 3, and residual error from Figures 4-7, corroborate with theoretical analysis and illustrate the effectiveness and rapid convergence of our proposed derivative-free inverse simultaneous iterative method as compared to the WDK2.

Data Availability
No data were used to support this study.

Conflicts of Interest
e authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this article.