Journal of NanomaterialsVolume 2011 (2011), Article ID 190391, 4 pagesdoi:10.1155/2011/190391

Research Article

Poole-Frenkel Conduction in Cu/Nano-SnO₂/Cu Arrangement

Hossein Mahmoudi Chenari,² Hassan Sedghi,¹ Mohammad Talebian,¹  Mir Maqsoud Golzan,¹ and Ali Hassanzadeh³

¹Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran²Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Maraghe University, Maraghe, Iran³Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran

Received 31 December 2010; Revised 6 May 2011; Accepted 23 May 2011

Academic Editor: Shaogang Hao

Copyright © 2011 Hossein Mahmoudi Chenari et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

It is well known that metal/Tin-dioxide/metal sandwich structures exhibit a field-assisted lowering of the potential barrier between donor-like center and the conduction band edge, known as the Poole-Frenkel effect. This behavior is indicated by a linear dependence of Iog  on , where is the current density, and is the applied voltage. In this study, the electrical properties of Cu/nano-SnO₂/Cu sandwich structures were investigated through current-voltage measurements at room temperature. Also, an attempt to explore the governing current flow mechanism was tried. Our results indicate that noticeable feature appearing clearly in the current-voltage characterization is the Poole-Frenkel and space-charge-limited conduction mechanisms.

1. Introduction

Nanocrystalline materials with average grain size of less than 50 nm have attracted considerable scientific interest because of their unusual physical and chemical properties [1]. The microstructure of nanocrystalline materials depends upon the method of preparation. Tin dioxide (SnO₂), a wide band gap (3.6 eV) n-type semiconductor, is one of the most important materials for gas sensors [2]. It is well known for its application in gas sensors and dye-based solar cells [3]. Because of their relatively low operating temperature and as oxidizing gases, SnO₂ nanoparticles have been extremely studied [4]. As a transparent conducting oxide (TCO), it has been widely used as optoelectronic devices such as flat panel displays and thin film solar energy cells [5]. As an n-type semiconductor, tin dioxide has been actively explored as the functional component in detecting combustible gases such as CO, H₂, and CH₄ [6]. Most of these studies concentrated on devices, which were fabricated with polycrystalline films as the sensing units [7]. Nanostructures of SnO₂ could also be employed to detect various gases [8, 9].

In some of these applications, the mechanism of electronic conduction strongly affects the device characteristics. Therefore, one needs to understand conduction mechanism. The type of electronic conduction mechanism depends on several factors, in particular, the nature of the metallic contact to the semiconductor (either ohmic or blocking), the level of voltage applied across the sample, surface roughness, and grain size and its temperature. Metal-semiconductor (MS) structures (or Schottky diodes) have been studied extensively because of the very importance and critical components in integrated circuit technology. Moreover, it is a very attractive tool for the characterization of semiconductor materials [10–13].

In the present work, We examine the mechanisms, which control carrier transport in Cu/nano-SnO₂/Cu sandwich structures. These include the study of gate voltage dependence of device leakage current.

2. Experimental Details

SnO₂ nanoparticles were synthesized by a simple sol-gel method which its details reported elsewhere [14]. SnO₂ nanopowder Pellets were made by applying a uniaxial pressure of 312.92 atmospheres on the powder sample. Polarization measurements were performed on the Cu/nano-SnO₂/Cu sequence system using a computer-controlled AUTOLAB potentiostat and galvanostat.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Polarization Study

A typical forward bias semilogarithmic versus characteristic of Cu/nano-SnO₂/Cu sandwich structures is shown in Figure 1. The leakage current can be affected by the surface roughness and grain size. The smaller grain size produces more grain boundaries and causes more leakage current [15]. Hence, it is suggested that the decrease of the leakage current of specimens can be attributed to the reduction of the surface roughness. The characteristics show also no double blocking behavior (see Figure 1). We assume that the copper electrode as a back contact does not block the current in reverse direction, which is especially the case for very low barriers. So the current transport through the Cu contact dominates the characteristic for positive voltages. Schottky emission, Poole-Frenkel, space-charge-limited conduction (SCLC), and so forth, are the possible conduction mechanisms in the studied junctions [16]. The governing conduction mechanism in Cu/nano-SnO₂/Cu Schottky diodes at hand can be figured out from the power of  curve. Power of the curve greater than 2 () indicates SCLC mechanism whereas being equal to 1 () imply ohmic character. When the power lies between 1 and 2 imposing either Schottky or Poole-Frenkel conduction mechanism. The linear sections of the curve could be interpreted in terms of either the Schottky emission or Poole-Frenkel emission. For the Schottky emission, the current density is expressed as follows [17]: where is the effective Richardson constant, is the Schottky barrier height at the electrode contact, and is the Schottky field lowering constant. For Pool-Frenkel emission, the current density is given by where is the Pool-Frenkel coefficient. The theoretical values of these coefficients are given by For Schottky diodes, thermionic emission (TE) model suggests the following relationship: where and are the applied voltage, Boltzman constant, temperature, ideality factor, and saturation current density, respectively. The saturation current density is given by where , , and are the Richardson constant, barrier height, and electron charge, respectively. The parameters and for SnO₂ nanoparticles with a grain size of 17.6 nm were calculated  A and 0.6015 eV, and for SnO₂ nanoparticles with a grain size of 52.4 nm were obtained 0.0312 A and 0.5073 eV, respectively, using the above equations.

Figure 1: versus characteristic of nano-SnO₂ with different grain sizes.

As shown in Figure 2, three linear regions are eventual in the characteristic of the Cu/nano-SnO₂/Cu sandwich structure. One of them is in the lower-voltage region (), where the power is equal to 1.2, imposing either Schottky or Poole-Frenkel conduction mechanism. In the second region, with increasing voltage, more electrons injected from electrode into the film and current density originates from the SCLC mechanism, where the power is equal to 2.7. Abrupt increment of the current density is characteristic of the SCLC mechanism due to the trapped carriers. As the applied voltage is increased further, strong injection of electrons takes place and causes an increase in the density of filled trapping sites and leading to an increase of film conduction. An abrupt increase in leakage current appeared which follows a trap-filled limited law. For this conduction, the increasing slop indicates that the correlations are determined by another distributed trap type [18].

Figure 2: Forward bias plot of the Cu/nano-SnO₂/Cu arrangement with a grain size of 17.6 nm.

In the higher voltage region (Section 3), less slope is observable and the “quasisaturation” of the current may be caused by the charge trapping. Consequently, an internal electric field is created, which is opposed to the external electric field, limiting the carriers flow. As can be seen in the Figure 3, similar analysis is carried out for nanostructure SnO₂ with a grain size of 52.4 nm.

Figure 3: Forward bias plot of the Cu/nano-SnO₂/Cu arrangement with a grain size of 52.4 nm.

The other possibility for the nonlinear characteristics is bulk-limited Poole-Frenkel emission. Figure 4 shows the plot of versus for Cu/nano-SnO₂/Cu arrangement with a grain size of 17.6 nm, which clearly yields a linear section of the curve, could be interpreted in terms of either Schottky emission or Pool-Frenkel emission. Corresponding experimental value of β calculated from the slope of the linear region of Figure 4 was found to be  eV m1/2 V−1/2. The experimental value of β for SnO₂ nanoparticles with a grain size of 52.4 nm, derived from the slope of the linear section of Figure 5, was found to be 3.42×10⁻⁵ eV m1/2 V−1/2. Theoretical values of and were found to be  eV m1/2 V−1/2 and  eV m1/2 V−1/2, respectively. Experimental value for in the both nanoparticle is nearly agreement with the theoretically calculated value of . Hence, we can conclude that the conduction mechanism in our nanocrystalline film is controled by the Poole-Frenkel effect and the Schottky effect is probably masked by the Poole-Frenkel emission from some shallow traps at grain boundaries. The adsorbed oxygen atoms at the grain boundary produce defect states which trap carriers and create a potential barrier. By applying an applied field, the barrier height is diminished and electrons can flow from interfacial states, thus it can be reason of the existence of the Poole-Frenkel mechanism [19].

Figure 4: Log plot of the Cu/nano-SnO₂/Cu arrangement with a grain size of 17.6 nm.

Figure 5: Log plot of the Cu/nano-SnO₂/Cu arrangement with a grain size of 52.4 nm.

4. Conclusion

The tetragonal tin dioxide nanoparticles were obtained by using sol-gel technique with thermal treatments. Possible mechanism for leakage current conduction in the Cu/nano-SnO₂/Cu sequence system showed characteristics of typical Schottky-barrier devices. The Poole-Frenkel effect has been observed in nanotin oxide thick film. This effect depends on the electron transport phenomenon through grain boundaries. Nanostructured SnO₂ films with a large number of grain boundaries contain a considerable number of trap states.

References

H. Gleiter, “Nanocrystalline materials,” Progress in Materials Science, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 223–315, 1989.

M. R. Yang, S. Y. Chu, and R. C. Chang, “Synthesis and study of the SnO₂ nanowires growth,” Sensors and Actuators, B, vol. 122, no. 1, pp. 269–273, 2007.

S. Ferrere, A. Zaban, and B. A. Gregg, “Dye sensitization of nanocrystalline tin oxide by perylene derivatives,” Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 101, no. 23, pp. 4490–4493, 1997.

A. R. Babar, S. S. Shinde, A. V. Moholkar, and K. Y. Rajpure, “Electrical and dielectric properties of co-precipitated nanocrystalline tin oxide,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 505, no. 2, pp. 743–749, 2010.

N. Amin, T. Isaka, A. Yamada, and M. Konagai, “Highly efficient 1 μm thick CdTe solar cells with textured TCOs,” Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, vol. 67, no. 1–4, pp. 195–201, 2001.

J. Kappler, A. Tomescu, N. Barsan, and V. Weimar, “CO consumption of Pd doped SnO₂ based sensors,” Thin Solid Films, vol. 391, no. 2, pp. 186–191, 2001.

R. Scott, S. Yang, D. Williams, and G. Ozin, “Electronically addressable SnO₂ inverted opal gas sensors fabricated on interdigitated gold microelectrodes,” Chemical Communications, no. 6, pp. 688–689, 2003.

A. Kolmakov, Y. Zhang, G. Cheng, and M. Moskovits, “Detection of CO and O₂ using tin oxide nanowire sensors,” Advanced Materials, vol. 15, no. 12, pp. 997–1000, 2003.

A. Maiti, J. A. Rodriguez, M. Law, P. Kung, J. R. Mckinney, and P. Yang, “SnO₂ nanoribbons as NO₂ sensors: insights from first principles calculations,” Nano Letters, vol. 3, no. 8, pp. 1025–1028, 2003.

M. A. Cowley and M. S. Sze, “Surface states and barrier height of metal-semiconductor systems,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 36, no. 10, pp. 3212–3220, 1965.

M. O. Nielsen, “Influence of semiconductor barrier tunneling on the current-voltage characteristics of tunnel metal-oxide-semiconductor diodes,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 54, no. 10, pp. 5880–5886, 1983.

C. H. Card and H. E. Rhoderick, “Studies of tunnel MOS diodes I. Interface effects in silicon Schottky diodes,” Journal of Physics D, vol. 4, no. 10, pp. 1589–1601, 1971.

A. Tataroglu and X. S. Altındal, “Characterization of current-voltage (I-V) and capacitance-voltage-frequency (C-V-f) features of Al/SiO₂/p-Si (MIS) Schottky diodes,” Microelectronic Engineering, vol. 83, no. 3, pp. 582–588, 2006.

A. Hassanzadeh, B. Moazzez, H. Haghgooie, M. Nasseri, M. M. Golzan, and H. Sedghi, “Synthesis of SnO₂ nanopowders by a sol-gel process using propanol-isopropanol mixture,” The Central European Journal of Chemistry, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 651–656, 2008.

M. S. Tsai, S. C. Sun, and T. Y. Tseng, “Effect of oxygen to argon ratio on properties of (Ba,Sr)TiO₃ thin films prepared by radio-frequency magnetron sputtering,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 82, no. 7, p. 3428, 1997.

M. S. Sze and K. K. Ng, Physics of Semiconductor Devices, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2007.

A. Wilson and R. A. Collins, “Electrical characteristics of planar phthalocyanine thin film gas sensors,” Sensors and Actuators, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 389–403, 1987.

L. Zhang, J. Zhai, W. Mo, and X. Yao, “The dielectric and leakage current behavior of CoFe₂O₄-BaTiO₃ composite films prepared by combining method of sol-gel and electrophoretic deposition,” Solid State Sciences, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 509–514, 2010.

A. N. Banerjee, R. Maity, S. Kundoo, and K. K. Chattopadhyay, “Poole-Frenkel effect in nanocrystalline SnO₂:F thin films prepared by a sol-gel dip-coating technique,” Physica Status Solidi A, vol. 201, no. 5, pp. 983–989, 2004.