Journal of Nanomaterials

Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 851862, 7 pages

doi:10.1155/2012/851862

Research Article

Tensile Mechanical Properties and Strengthening Mechanism of Hybrid Carbon Nanotube and Silicon Carbide Nanoparticle-Reinforced Magnesium Alloy Composites

Xia Zhou,¹ Depeng Su,¹ Chengwei Wu,¹ and Liming Liu²

¹State Key Laboratory of Structural Analysis for Industrial Equipment, Department of Engineering Mechanics, Faculty of Vehicle Engineering and Mechanics, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China

²School of Materials Science and Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China

Received 1 February 2012; Revised 10 June 2012; Accepted 25 June 2012

Academic Editor: Tianxi Liu

Copyright © 2012 Xia Zhou et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

AZ91 magnesium alloy hybrid composites reinforced with different hybrid ratios of carbon nanotubes (CNTs) and silicon carbide (SiC) nanoparticulates were fabricated by semisolid stirring assisted ultrasonic cavitation. The results showed that grains of the matrix in the AZ91/(CNT + SiC) composites were obviously refined after adding hybrid CNTs and SiC nanoparticles to the AZ91 alloy, and the room-temperature mechanical properties of AZ91/(CNT + SiC) hybrid composites were improved comparing with the unreinforced AZ91 matrix. In addition, the tensile mechanical properties of the AZ91 alloy-based hybrid composites were considerably improved at the mass hybrid ratio of 7 : 3 for CNTs and SiC nanoparticles; in particular, the tensile and yield strength were increased, respectively, by about 45 and 55% after gravity permanent mould casting. The reason for an increase in the room-temperature strength of the hybrid composites should be mainly attributable to the larger hybrid ratio of CNTs and SiC nanoparticles, the coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) mismatch between matrix and hybrid reinforcements, the dispersive strengthening effects (Orowan strengthening), and the grain refining (Hall-Petch effect).

1. Introduction

Magnesium-based composites as a result of their low density and superior mechanical properties are potential candidates for applications in aerospace, automobile, transportation, and consumer industries where weight saving is of great importance [1]. Many attempts have been directed in recent years towards the development of Mg-based composites with nanoparticulates such as Al₂O₃, Y₂O₃, SiC, AlN, and/or carbon nanotubes (CNTs) [2, 3] using different methods such as powder metallurgy, casting, rapid solidification, and in situ fabrication. In addition, the investigations by many researchers [4–8] have shown that variation of strength and ductility of magnesium can be realized through the use of ceramic reinforcements at nanolength scale. AZ91 alloy system has been paid much attention because of its widespread use in engineering applications. Results of the literature research indicated that mechanical behavior of nanaometer-sized particle or fiber-reinforced metal matrix composites has been primarily investigated, whereas a relatively little amount of research is conducted to investigate mechanical behavior of nanaometer-sized particulate and fiber hybrid reinforced metal matrix composites. Investigations carried out by Deng et al. [9] illustrated that mechanical properties of AZ91 magnesium matrix composites reinforced with submicron-SiC particulates were improved significantly. Li et al. [10] produced multiwalled carbon nanotube (MWCNT) reinforced magnesium alloy composites with high compressive strength by a predispersing procedure of CNTs on Mg alloy chips followed by a strongly melt stirring technique. Thakur et al. [11] showed the improvement in yield strength, ultimate tensile strength, and strain to failure when CNT/Mg composites was hybridized with nanoparticles of alumina. Tun and Gupta [12] reported microstructure and improved tensile properties of magnesium/(yttria + nickel) hybrid composites using hybrid microwave sintering. The literature research, however, revealed that no attempt is made to assess the effect of CNTs and SiC nanoparticulates on the mechanical properties of AZ91 Mg alloy. It is still a challenging task to synthesis bulk-sized engineering materials with homogeneous distribution of hybrid nanometer-sized reinforcements and to discuss the hybrid reinforcement mechanism. The ultrasonic cavitation-based solidification processing [13] has a potential predominance for dispersing nanometer-sized particles or fibers in metal melts.

The hybrid composites in the present study were synthesized using the self-designed ultrasonic cavitation technique coupled with semisolid mechanical stirring method. Focus is placed in this study to correlate the mechanical properties with the microstructural characteristics due to copresence of SiC nanoparticle and CNT reinforcements. The tensile mechanical properties and fracture behavior of hybrid composites are compared with that of AZ91 alloy to justify their development. The enhancing mechanism of the hybrid composites is finally discussed.

2. Experimental Procedures

2.1. Materials and Processing

In this study, Bulk AZ91 magnesium alloy with a nominal composition of Mg-9.0Al-0.95Zn-0.2Mn (acquired from Shenyang Research Institute of Foundry, China) was used as the matrix material. The beta-SiC with a particulate size range of 30 nm (supplied with Jiuyuan Nano-materials Inc., Sichuan, China) and MWCNT with an average diameter of 50 nm and a length of 1–5 μm (procured from Nanotech Port Inc., Shenzhen, China) were used as the hybrid reinforcements. The TEM morphology of the hybrid reinforcements is shown in Figure 1 after they were pretreated by purification, surface modification, and ultrasonic dispersion. AZ91 Mg alloy/(CNT + SiC) hybrid composites with different hybrid ratios were synthesized using self-designed semisolid stirring assisted ultrasonic cavitation method.

Figure 1: TEM micrograph of composite powder.

Figure 2 shows the schematic experimental setup for the semisolid stirring assisted ultrasonic processing of CNT and SiC nanoparticle-reinforced magnesium matrix composites. The whole experiments were carried out with the protection of 0.5% SF₆ + N₂. The protective gas mixture of N₂ and SF₆ with a volume ratio of 1000 : 1.8 can prevent magnesium alloy from evaporation and avoid burning by the compact surface film [14] formed on molten magnesium alloy. First, about 1 kg of AZ91 alloy was melted at 720°C and then cooled to 590°C at which the matrix alloy was in semisolid condition; the pretreated CNTs and SiC nanoparticles were fed into the semisolid Mg alloy melt from a steel tube. The total mass content of CNTs and SiC nanoparticles in the AZ91/(CNT + SiC) composites was 1.0 mass % while the hybrid mass ratio of CNTs and SiC nanoparticles was different. The semisolid stirring speed and time for the AZ91/(CNT + SiC) composites were 1000 r/min and 20 min, respectively. After adequately stirring the melt, the melt was rapidly reheated to 700°C for 5 min. Then the ultrasonic probe made of titanium was dipped into the melt for about 35 mm after the stirrer was removed from the melt. The ultrasonic processing device consists of a transducer with a maximum power of 4 kW and frequency of about 18 kHz. The melt was ultrasonically processed for 20 min before the ultrasonic probe was removed. Then the melt was elevated to a pouring temperature of 720°C and cast into a steel permanent mold which was preheated to 450°C. For comparison, an AZ91 alloy sample without semisolid stirring assisted ultrasonic processing was also cast under the same conditions.

Figure 2: Schematic of the experimental setup for fabricating AZ91/(CNT + SiC) composites.

2.2. Microstructural Characterization and Tensile Mechanical Behavior

The microstructural and fracture surface characterization studies of the composites were carried out using a XJG-05 optical microscope, a JSM-5600LV SEM, and a TECNAI G2205-TWIN TEM, respectively. The tensile tests were conducted on 3354 Instron tensile testing machine using round tension test specimens of 5 mm diameter and 25 mm gauge length at a nominal strain rate of 2 × 10⁻³ s⁻¹.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Microstructure of AZ91 Hybrid Composites

The optical micrographs of the as-cast AZ91 Mg alloy and the AZ91 Mg-alloy-based hybrid composites are shown in Figure 3. It is observed that the coarse grain structure of AZ91 Mg-alloy (Figure 3(a)) is refined significantly when the hybrid content in the AZ91/(0.7% CNT + 0.3% SiC) composites increases to 1.0 mass % (Figure 3(b)). Here, AZ91/(0.7% CNT + 0.3% SiC) refers to the hybrid CNT/SiC nanoparticle mass ratio of 7 : 3 and the hybrid content of 1.0 mass% in this composite, and so on. Representative SEM images of the AZ91/(0.7% CNT + 0.3% SiC), shown in Figure 4, indicate a relatively good dispersion of SiC nanoparticles (Figure 4(a)) and CNTs (Figure 4(b)) in the matrix. Under the acoustic cavitations and acoustic stream effects produced by high intensity ultrasonic treatment, the introduction of the nanoparticles and CNTs into the matrices provides some heterogeneous nucleation sites during solidification, and as a result, the grain size of the matrix in the AZ91/(CNT + SiC) composites is obviously decreased while the distribution of CNTs and SiC nanoparticles is improved in the AZ91 Mg-alloy based hybrid composites. This can be considered as the main prerequisite for achieving good mechanical properties.

(a)

(b)

Figure 3: Optical micrographs of (a) AZ91 Mg alloy matrix and (b) AZ91/(0.7% CNT + 0.3% SiC) composites. Here, AZ91/(0.7% CNT + 0.3% SiC) refers to the hybrid CNT/SiC nanoparticle mass ratio of 7 : 3 and the hybrid content of 1.0 mass% in this composite, and so on.

(a)

(b)

Figure 4: High-magnification SEM images of (a) the SiC nanoparticles distributed in the as-cast AZ91/(0.7% CNT + 0.3% SiC) and (b) the CNTs distributed in the fractograph of the hybrid composites.

Figure 5 shows a more high magnification TEM image of the AZ91 Mg alloy based hybrid composite along with selected area diffraction patterns (SADPs) of two areas. From the TEM image of this composite shown in Figure 5, it can be seen that the nanometer-sized SiC particles and CNTs are uniformly distributed in the area observed. In the SADP from the marked A area in Figure 5, there are diffuse haloes due to the amorphous carbon film on the copper grid and sharp rings due to the MWCNTs. The D-spacing values of the first five clear rings were found to be in good agreement with those of MWCNT’s (002), (101), (004), (110), and (112), and this can also be proved by the experimental result of Belin and Epron [15]. In the SADP from the marked B area in Figure 5, with the exception of diffraction rings from the MWCNT, the corresponding diffraction pattern can be indexed as (111), (200), (220), and (311), and this matches well with the cubic β-SiC [16]. The TEM studies have showed the hybrid composite microstructure was obtained in the AZ91 Mg-based composites, manifested by the coexistence of nanaometer-sized β-SiC diffraction spots and MWCNT sharp rings with central haloes of the amorphous carbon film.

Figure 5: TEM image and SADPs of two selected areas of the AZ91 Mg-alloy-based hybrid composites showing the presence of hybrid composite structure.

3.2. Tensile Stress-Strain Curves and Tensile Properties

Tensile stress-strain curves for the pure AZ91 magnesium alloy and the CNT filled as well as nanometer-sized SiC filled composites are shown in Figure 6. It exhibits that the pure AZ91 magnesium alloy, the SiC nanoparticle filled AZ91, and CNT filled AZ91 composites show a brittle type of curves, but the addition of SiC nanoparticles or CNTs results in little increase in the yield and tensile strength. This may be related to the nonuniform distribution of nanoparticles and CNTs when their adding amounts are larger [17].

Figure 6: Stress-strain curves of AZ91 magnesium alloy, 1.0 mass % CNT reinforced AZ91 (AZ91/1.0% CNT) and 1.0 mass % SiC nanoparticle-reinforced AZ91 (AZ91/1.0% SiC) composites obtained by tensile test.

Figure 7 shows the stress-strain curves of AZ91/(CNT + SiC) hybrid composites with different hybrid ratios. It can be seen that hybrid composites also show a similar type of curves as do CNT- or SiC-reinforced composites, but the change from linear to nonlinear deformation occurs at a higher stress in the former case probably because of the coexistence of CNTs and SiC nanoparticles. The yield strength, maximum tensile stress, and elongation rate at break of the hybrid composites increased with the increase of hybrid mass ratio between CNTs and SiC nanoparticles. When the hybrid mass ratio of CNTs and SiC nanoparticles ranged between 5 : 5 and 7 : 3, the tensile mechanical properties of the hybrid composites were much better than those of the AZ91 magnesium alloy. In particular, when the mass ratio of CNTs and SiC nanoparticles was 7 : 3, the tensile strength and elongation of the hybrid composite reached the maximums at the same time. The maximum tensile strength and elongation were up to 305 MPa and 9%, respectively; they increased by 45 and 50% compared with those of the AZ91 magnesium alloy matrix. As revealed by the fractured surfaces of the tensile specimens in Figure 8, significant improvements in tensile properties were accompanied by a transition from a brittle fracture (Figure 8(a)) for as-cast AZ91 Mg-alloy to quasi-cleavage fracture state (Figure 8(b)) for AZ91/(0.7% CNT + 0.3% SiC).

Figure 7: Stress-strain curves of AZ91/(CNT + SiC) hybrid composites with different hybrid ratios.

(a)

(b)

Figure 8: Representative SEM fractographs of: (a) AZ91 Mg-alloy and (b) AZ91/(0.7% CNT + 0.3% SiC).

3.3. Strengthening Mechanisms

The improvement in the yield strength due to four factors including the load-bearing effect, coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) mismatch, Orowan strengthening, and Hall-Petch effect can be coupled together using the quadrature method [18–20] or another method given by Ramakrishnan based on the modified shear lag model [21]. However, the cases of the hybrid composites especially reinforced by both particles and fibers are not taken into account in the two above-mentioned methods. The improvement in yield strength is expressed as follows:

The load bearing effect, , is caused by the shear transfer of load from the matrix to the particles and is represented by

where is the yield stress of AZ91 matrix reinforced with CNTs considering hybrid effects, its value is obtained by experiments,  MPa.

The improvement in yield strength, , due to the generation of geometrically necessary dislocations to accommodate the CTE mismatch between the particle and matrix is given by Dai et al. [22] as follows:

where and are the volume fraction and diameter of SiC particles, respectively; is corrected as the grain size of AZ91 matrix reinforced with CNTs; is the difference in coefficients of thermal expansion between AZ91 matrix reinforced with CNTs and SiC; is the difference between the processing and the test temperatures. and are constants, is the shear modulus of AZ91 Mg alloy matrix reinforced with CNTs, and is the Burgers vector of CNT reinforced AZ91 matrix. The above mentioned data for the SiC nanoparticle and CNT-reinforced magnesium composites tested at room temperature are used , , , , , , , , and  nm.

The contributions of different strengthening mechanisms to the yield stress of the AZ91/(CNT + SiC) composite were calculated using (1)–(5). The results are summarized in Table 1, where it can be observed that a final strength improvement of 73.1 MPa is achieved. This is very close to the experimental of about 73.5 MPa determined from the stress-strain curves shown in Figures 6 and 7 for AZ91 Mg alloy and AZ91/(0.7% CNT + 0.3% SiC) hybrid composite, respectively. The main contributing factors come from the large CTE difference between the nanosized hybrid reinforcements and the AZ91 Mg alloy matrix, the small size of the reinforcements and the grain refining effect. In addition, high hybrid ratio of CNTs and SiC nanoparticles is beneficial for load transfer, uniform distribution of hybrid reinforcements and their interfacial bonding with AZ91 magnesium alloy matrix [23]. In the present study, when the mass fraction of the hybrid reinforcements is given (1.0 mass %), the higher the content of CNTs in the hybrid reinforcements is, the greater the elastic modulus and yield strength of the composites are, but when the ratio of CNT to SiC nanoparticle is higher than 7 : 3, the performance of the composites is less increased. On the other hand, SEM observations at high magnifications revealed apparently that interfacial reactions did not exist between hybrid reinforcement and the matrix due to surface pretreatment of the hybrid reinforcement. Thus, the mechanical properties of the AZ91 magnesium alloy are enhanced markedly by small amount of CNT and nanometer-sized SiC hybrid reinforcements.

Table 1: Calculated contributions of different strengthening mechanisms to the yield stress of the AZ91/(0.7% CNT + 0.3% SiC) composites.

(MPa)
(MPa)
(MPa)
(MPa)
(MPa)

10.7
70.1
17.9
0.35
73.1

4. Conclusions

(1)The addition of small amount of hybrid CNTs and SiC nanoparticles results in significant improvements in both tensile properties and toughness. The best strength properties of AZ91 Mg based composites are obtained at 1.0 mass % of CNTs and SiC nanoparticles with the mass hybrid ratio of 7 : 3. Moreover, this causes a considerable increase in the ductility of the hybrid composites relative to the monolithic materials.(2)Based on several kinds of improved strengthening mechanism model, it is shown that the yield strength of AZ91-based hybrid composites is mainly governed by the hybrid ratio of CNTs and SiC nanoparticles, the mismatch in the CTE between the matrix and nanometer-sized reinforcements, Orowan strengthening, and grain refinement effects. The overall strengthening effect is related to the hybrid ratio of CNTs and SiC nanoparticles. The larger the hybrid ratio is, the higher the strength of the hybrid composite is. The improved model shows excellent agreement with the experimental data.

Acknowledgment

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support from the Natural Science Foundation Project of Liaoning Province of China (201102040).

References

C. S. Goh, J. Wei, L. C. Lee, and M. Gupta, “Development of novel carbon nanotube reinforced magnesium nanocomposites using the powder metallurgy technique,” Nanotechnology, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 7–12, 2006.

J. Lan, Y. Yang, and X. Li, “Microstructure and microhardness of SiC nanoparticles reinforced magnesium composites fabricated by ultrasonic method,” Materials Science and Engineering A, vol. 386, no. 1-2, pp. 284–290, 2004.

G. Cao, H. Choi, J. Oportus, H. Konishi, and X. Li, “Study on tensile properties and microstructure of cast AZ91D/AlN nanocomposites,” Materials Science and Engineering A, vol. 494, no. 1-2, pp. 127–131, 2008.

S. F. Hassan and M. Gupta, “Development of high performance magnesium nano-composites using nano-Al₂O₃ as reinforcement,” Materials Science and Engineering A, vol. 392, no. 1-2, pp. 163–168, 2005.

W. L. E. Wong and M. Gupta, “Simultaneously improving strength and ductility of magnesium using nano-size SiC particulates and microwaves,” Advanced Engineering Materials, vol. 8, no. 8, pp. 735–740, 2006.

C. S. Goh, J. Wei, L. C. Lee, and M. Gupta, “Properties and deformation behaviour of Mg-Y₂O₃ nanocomposites,” Acta Materialia, vol. 55, no. 15, pp. 5115–5121, 2007.

S. F. Hassan and M. Gupta, “Development and characterization of ductile Mg/Y₂O₃ nanocomposites,” Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology, vol. 129, no. 3, pp. 462–467, 2007.

K. S. Tun and M. Gupta, “Improving mechanical properties of magnesium using nano-yttria reinforcement and microwave assisted powder metallurgy method,” Composites Science and Technology, vol. 67, no. 13, pp. 2657–2664, 2007.

K. K. Deng, K. Wu, Y. W. Wu, K. B. Nie, and M. Y. Zheng, “Effect of submicron size SiC particulates on microstructure and mechanical properties of AZ91 magnesium matrix composites,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 504, no. 2, pp. 542–547, 2010.

Q. Q. Li, A. Viereckl, C. A. Rottmair, and R. F. Singer, “Improved processing of carbon nanotube/magnesium alloy composites,” Composites Science and Technology, vol. 69, no. 7-8, pp. 1193–1199, 2009.

S. K. Thakur, T. S. Srivatsan, and M. Gupta, “Synthesis and mechanical behavior of carbon nanotube-magnesium composites hybridized with nanoparticles of alumina,” Materials Science and Engineering A, vol. 466, no. 1-2, pp. 32–37, 2007.

K. S. Tun and M. Gupta, “Development of magnesium/(yttria + nickel) hybrid nanocomposites using hybrid microwave sintering: microstructure and tensile properties,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 487, no. 1-2, pp. 76–82, 2009.

Y. Yang and X. Li, “Ultrasonic cavitation-based nanomanufacturing of bulk aluminum matrix nanocomposites,” Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, vol. 129, no. 2, pp. 252–255, 2007.

G. Pettersen, E. Øvrelid, G. Tranell, J. Fenstad, and H. Gjestland, “Characterisation of the surface films formed on molten magnesium in different protective atmospheres,” Materials Science and Engineering A, vol. 332, no. 1-2, pp. 285–294, 2002.

T. Belin and F. Epron, “Characterization methods of carbon nanotubes: a review,” Materials Science and Engineering B, vol. 119, no. 2, pp. 105–118, 2005.

J. Z. Guo, Y. Zuo, Z. J. Li, W. D. Gao, and J. L. Zhang, “Preparation of SiC nanowires with fins by chemical vapor deposition,” Physica E, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 262–266, 2007.

S. Y. Liu, W. Z. Li, X. Y. Jia, F. P. Gao, and Q. Y. Zhang, “Preparation and properties of nano-sized SiC particles reinforced AZ91D magnesium matrix composites,” Rare Metal Materials and Engineering, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 134–138, 2010 (Chinese).

B. Q. Han and D. C. Dunand, “Microstructure and mechanical properties of magnesium containing high volume fractions of yttria dispersoids,” Materials Science and Engineering A, vol. 277, no. 1-2, pp. 297–304, 2000.

F. Tang, I. E. Anderson, T. Gnaupel-Herold, and H. Prask, “Pure Al matrix composites produced by vacuum hot pressing: tensile properties and strengthening mechanisms,” Materials Science and Engineering A, vol. 383, no. 2, pp. 362–373, 2004.

Z. Zhang and D. L. Chen, “Consideration of Orowan strengthening effect in particulate-reinforced metal matrix nanocomposites: a model for predicting their yield strength,” Scripta Materialia, vol. 54, no. 7, pp. 1321–1326, 2006.

N. Ramakrishnan, “An analytical study on strengthening of particulate reinforced metal matrix composites,” Acta Materialia, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 69–77, 1996.

L. H. Dai, Z. Ling, and Y. L. Bai, “Size-dependent inelastic behavior of particle-reinforced metal-matrix composites,” Composites Science and Technology, vol. 61, no. 8, pp. 1057–1063, 2001.

S. R. Bakshi and A. Agarwal, “An analysis of the factors affecting strengthening in carbon nanotube reinforced aluminum composites,” Carbon, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 533–544, 2011.