Core-Shell Structure in Doped Inorganic Nanoparticles : Approaches for Optimizing Luminescence Properties

Doped inorganic luminescent nanoparticles (NPs) have been widely used in both research and application fields due to their distinctive properties. However, there is an urgent demand to improve their luminescence efficiency, which is greatly reduced by surface effects. In this paper, we review recent advances in optimizing luminescence properties of doped NPs based on core-shell structure, which are basically classified into two categories: one is by use of surface coating with nonmetal materials to weaken the influence of surface effect and the other is with metal shell via metal enhanced luminescence. Different materials used to coat NPs are surveyed, and their advantages and disadvantages are both commented on.Moreover, problems in current core-shell structured luminescent NPs are pointed out and strategies furthering the optimization of luminescence properties are suggested.


Introduction
With the development of nanoscience and nanotechnology, more and more researches focus on core-shell nanostructures.A statistical data analysis is presented in Figure 1 to show an accelerated increase of published SCI papers on the theme of "core-shell nanoparticles." One motivation of using core-shell nanostructures is to achieve multiple functions.Usually, NPs have limited functions owing to the inherent property of constituted materials.Combining two or more kinds of materials into one particle, in the form of core-shell structure, is an effective way to address this issue.For instance, magnetic-luminescent bifunctional nanocomposites can be formed by coating magnetic NPs with a layer of luminescent material as a shell [1][2][3][4][5][6][7].When magnetic NPs are surface modified by a layer of catalytic material, magnetic-catalytic core-shell NPs are obtained [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16].
Another important motivation of utilizing core-shell nanostructure is to improve properties of NPs, such as luminescence efficiency.There are mainly two directions in enhancing luminescence properties of nanomaterial: inhibit the negative factors and promote the positive factors.
A great deal of studies including ours has demonstrated that luminescence efficiency and lifetime of materials will be greatly reduced compared with the bulk ones when their size is reduced to nanoscale [17][18][19][20].This is usually ascribed to large surface area of nanomaterials, unsaturated bonds on the surface or high surface energy, which are prone to quench the luminescence of emission centers on or near the surface [21][22][23][24].In view of this, surface coating in the form of a core-shell structure may efficiently eliminate these negative influences of surface effect on luminescence of doped NPs.On the other hand, radiative transition rate and excitation efficiency of luminescent species will be increased when the distance between luminescent species and noble metal is within a certain range [25,26].Therefore, luminescent properties of doped NPs can be ameliorated via metal enhanced luminescence if a metal shell is coated around NPs.
This review mainly focuses on recent development of approaches for optimizing luminescence properties of inorganic doped NPs through core-shell structures.

Core-Shell Structure to Weaken Surface Effect
For doped NPs, because of their limited sizes, sites occupied by doped ions can no more be considered as equivalent [27].
In NPs, therefore, inhomogeneous linewidth gets broader [28], originally degenerated energy levels may split [22], and selection rules may be loosened.Variations in the position of spectral lines and branching ratios can be observed with selective excitation [29].Defects and disorders related to breakage of lattice periodicity on the large surface area of nanomaterials may introduce local electronic states into band gap, acting as traps for excitation.Besides, unsaturated bonds on surface render the particle surface very active, so that light ions and radicals may be adsorbed and attached onto the surface.Ions coupled with them would have high multiphonon relaxation rate and act also as traps.In many cases, surface provides an additional quench path for the luminescence of ion centers in NPs, resulting in fast decay and low quantum efficiency (QE) [30].Wang et al. [31] presented direct evidence of surface quenching effect associated with size-dependent luminescence of upconversion (UC) NPs.The influence of surface quenching on decay curve and QE of ion centers in NPs was discussed by Huang and You [32], considering energy transfer between doped ions and surface quench centers.QE and decay curve under nonselective excitation were calculated numerically by integrating over the sample.Surface effect of nanophosphors was studied by time-resolved spectroscopy by Tian et al. [33], who suggested that surface quenching effects could be negligible when luminescence centers were more than 7 nm away from the surface.
For nondoped quantum dots (QDs), there are similar surface effects.Chou et al. [34] demonstrated that organic molecules on the surface of CdS QDs largely decreased photoluminescence (PL) quantum yield (QY) based on density function theory computation.They proposed that the interactions between capping molecules and CdS QDs might be attributed to functional groups and CdS clusters.
Core-shell structure is an effective way to weaken surface effect of NPs.According to the nature of adopted core material to that of shell material, core-shell nanostructures are approximately separated into "homogeneous" or "heterogeneous" in this review, corresponding to the same or different materials, respectively.
2.1.Heterogeneous Core-Shell Nanostructures 2.1.1.Silica Coating.For heterogeneous core-shell nanostructures, the shell can be classified into two categories: silica or nonsilica.Silica has the attributes of good biocompatibility, water solubility, and synthesis, hence, are widely used to coat NPs.Silica can withstand a high annealing temperature, which is helpful to enhance the crystalline of luminescent materials.Moreover, the thickness of silica shell can enlarge the distance between doped ions and surface quenching centers.Therefore, PL properties of doped NPs can be greatly enhanced through the decrease of nonradiative transition after silica coating.Doped QDs were silica coated by microemulsion or precipitation method [35,36].Compared to uncoated ZnS:Mn NPs, silica-coated ZnS:Mn NPs had improved PL intensity as well as good photostability.Rare-earth (RE) doped vanadate could be silica coated by Stöber method [37].A remarkable luminescence enhancement up to 2.17 times was observed in colloidal YVO 4 :Eu@SiO 2 nanocrystals (NCs), compared to that of bare YVO 4 :Eu NCs.A significant improvement of luminescence intensity was also observed in LaF 3 :Nd 3+ @SiO 2 core-shell NPs [38].The phenomenon was additionally ascribed to the change of environment of LaF 3 :Nd 3+ core imposed by the silica shell.
A series of Y 2 O 3 :Eu 3+ @SiO 2 with different silica-coating thicknesses were synthesized by Liu et al. [39].It was interesting to find that the silica shell not only changed the luminescence intensity of NPs but also led to the redistribution of 5 D 0 -7 F  branch ratios under 7 F  -5 D 2 excitation.The increased intensity ratio of 5 D 0 -7 F 2 to 5 D 0 -7 F  ( ̸ = 2) was attributed to the thickening of silica shell, which decreased excitation power density and suppressed reabsorption.The variation of the effective refractive index of the core-shell composites led to the increase of lifetime with shell thickness, while the reduced reabsorption process decreased the lifetime.Therefore, an optimum lifetime appeared as a function of shell thickness.RE-doped UC NPs is another type of important luminescent NPs largely due to their biological applications with nearinfrared (NIR) radiation [40].The developed core-shell UC NPs are attractive due to their excellent photostability, highly efficient luminescence, and low toxicity with biocompatible shell material.UC luminescence intensity of silica-coated NdF 3 was reported to about 1.6 times of bare NdF 3 NPs [41], and the effect of coating on the UC luminescence intensity in RE-doped NaYF 4 UCNCs was strongly dependent on the volume ratio of the core and shell [42,43].In another work, Lü et al. [44] presented that the UC luminescence intensity  2).According to the relative variable ratios of the UC luminescence intensities of silica-coated NPs, a competitive process between two mechanisms was proposed.One mechanism was the role conversion of RE ions on the surface of NPs from the dormant state to the activated state owing to complementary ligand fields from noncrystalline silica shells.The other mechanism was the absorption effects of the shells on incident pump light and the reabsorption effects on the UC luminescence.The role conversion of lanthanide ions was prevailing in thin shelled NPs, whereas the absorption and the reabsorption effects became predominant when a thicker silica shell is coated.
Hence, an optimal thickness of silica shell was possible to achieve the maximum UC luminescence.
Although silica has been utilized to coat a variety of doped luminescent NPs, it has an inherent shortcoming: a large lattice mismatch commonly exists between amorphous silica shell and particle core.The consequent interface defects may give rise to additional luminescence quenching.Thus, a preferable core-shell structure to inhibit surface effects should be better lattice matched.

Nonsilica
Coating.Zhu et al. [45] reported that YVO 4 :Eu 3+ @YBO 3 core-shell heteronanostructures exhibited much stronger PL than YVO 4 :Eu 3+ NCs under the same conditions.Shell ratio (SR) is the molar percentage of the shell material in the core-shell heteronanostructures, which is a critical factor in PL enhancement.The heteronanostructures exhibited the highest PL efficiency when SR = 1/7, whose PL intensity was 27% higher than that of the YVO 4 :Eu 3+ NCs.When SR < 1/7, PL intensity increased with increasing SR.This was because the surface recombination, surface defects density and surface state density of YVO 4 :Eu 3+ NCs reduced with increasing the YBO 3 coating.When SR > 1/7, PL intensity decreased with increasing molar percentage of the nonluminescent shell material.Lin et al. [46][47][48] prepared CeF 3 , CeF 3 :Tb 3+ , and CeF 3 :Tb 3+ @LaF 3 core-shell NPs which show characteristic emission of Ce 3+ (5d-4f) and Tb 3+ (ff) respectively.When the CeF 3 :Tb 3+ NPs were coated with the LaF 3 shells, the emission intensity was improved by 28% with respect to that of CeF 3 :Tb 3+ core NPs.The energyloss processes on the surface luminescence centers could be significantly decreased by the LaF 3 shell which provided a barrier for energy migration to the outer surface of the shell, and thus the luminescence intensity and lifetime of the core-shell NPs were greatly enhanced.Boyer et al. [49] synthesized NaGdF 4 :Tb 3+ ,Ce 3+ @NaYF 4 NPs that formed colloidal solutions in nonpolar organic solvents and showed green luminescence under ultraviolet (UV) excitation.Coreshell NPs demonstrated higher QY (∼30%) under UV light and greater resistance to cerium oxidation when compared to the core-only NPs.
Kömpe et al. [50] obtained CePO 4 :Tb@LaPO 4 core-shell NPs with a total QY of 80%, which was quite close to the value of the bulk material.Further recommendations of enhancing QY of NPs included optimizing the thickness of the shell and employing metal salts of extremely high purity.Another work showed that the luminescence properties of Ce 3+ and Tb 3+ ions in doped CePO 4 and LaPO 4 core and core-shell NPs did not only differ with respect to their QYs [51].The Ce 3+ emission in core NPs was red-shifted compared to core-shell particles.Energy transfer from excited states in volume sites to surface sites was responsible for this observation.
A strong linear dependence of the NaGdF 4 shell thickness on the optical response of the hexagonal NaYF 4 :Yb,Er@ NaGdF 4 core-shell UCNCs had been presented by Zhang et al. [52].During growth of the NaGdF 4 shells, surface defects of the NCs could be gradually passivated by the shell deposition process, which resulted in the obvious enhancement of the overall UC emission intensity and lifetime and more resistant to quenching by water molecules.Another work reported that NaGdF 4 :Yb,Er@ NaYF 4 core-shell NPs with narrow size distribution ( < 10%) were prepared by one pot successive layer-by-layer (SLBL) strategy [53].Shell thickness of the obtained NPs could be well controlled from 1 monolayer (ML) (∼0.36 nm) to more than 20 ML (∼8 nm) by simply tuning the amounts of shell precursors, which resulted in the significant improving on UC luminescence efficiency (up to 0.51 ± 0.08%) and stability (more resistant to quenching by water).It was important to note that nearly 30% luminescence was quenched by water even after over coated with a 16 ML (∼5.5 nm) shell.It was assumed that the high-energy stretching vibration of the water molecule could be regarded as a surface oscillator.The interaction between this oscillator and the luminescence center (lanthanide ions) might also be realized without contacting.It meant that the luminescence could be quenched by water with the noncontacting way, which was somewhat like the fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET).Chen et al. [54] reported novel -(NaYbF 4 :0.5%Tm3+ )@CaF 2 core-shell NPs with efficient NIR in -NIR out UC PL and their applications for high-contrast in vitro and deep tissue bioimaging.An epitaxial CaF 2 heteroshell increased the intensity of UC PL from -NaYbF 4 :0.5%Tm3+ NPs 35 times.The QY of NIR UC PL in the -(NaYbF 4 :0.5%Tm3+ )@CaF 2 core-shell NPs was measured to be 0.60 ± 0.1% under low-energy excitation of 0.3 W/cm 2 .
Core-shell nanostructures with improved luminescence properties have been widely applied in various fields.For more examples and detailed informations on applications of different core-shell NPs, readers are referred to some other excellent reviews by Kalele et al. [55], Selvan et al. [56], Wang et al. [40], and so forth.

Homogeneous
Core-Shell Nanostructures.Homogeneous core-shell nanostructures usually refer to doped core-shell nanostructures which adopt the same matrix material for the core and shell, containing dopant ions in the core, while the shell is pure matrix material or doped with other ions.The advantage of homogeneous core-shell nanostructure is the following.There is almost no problem of lattice mismatch between the core and shell, so that there will be fewer defects and quenching centers on the interfaces.In addition, since the shell and core have the same matrix, the shell is possible to transfer energy to the dopant ions in the vicinity of the surface of the core, and the overall absorption and emission intensity will be improved.
Quan et al. [57] observed a 30% PL intensity enhancement in ZnS:Mn@ZnS core-shell NCs comparing with bare ZnS:Mn, which was ascribed to the elimination of the surface defects.Q. Xiao and C. Xiao [58] also reported a similar phenomenon and conclusion in ZnS:Mn@ZnS coreshell NPs.Cao et al. [59] demonstrated that Mn 2+ emission at 580 nm in the ZnS:Mn@ZnS core-shell NPs was seven times stronger than that in the uncoated ZnS:Mn.Their experiment results indicated that both ZnS shell and UV light treatment (samples are exposed to the irradiation of a UV lamp [60,61]) could passivate nanoparticle surface, remove nonradiative relaxation paths, and thus enhance the overall luminescence quantum yield of uncoated ZnS:Mn.However, UV light treatment could only enhance the luminescence in the uncoated ZnS:Mn NPs but led to no luminescence enhancement in the coated ones.Some calculations indicated that Mn 2+ ions were not randomly distributed in the particle but preferred to occupy the sites close to the surface.This may be related to the "self-purification" process of nanomaterials [62], whereby Mn 2+ has a tendency to be expelled to the nanoparticle surface [63].Jiang et al. [64] studied the shell thickness dependence of luminescence intensity in core-shell ZnS:Mn@ZnS NPs.As the ZnS shell on the ZnS:Mn NPs thickened, an increase in the intensity of Mn 2+ emission followed by a steady decline could be observed.The concentration of the luminescence center gradually decreased with shell thickening, which would consequently contribute a reducing effect to the emission intensity.
Qu et al. [65] synthesized LaF 3 :Yb 3+ ,Er 3+ @LaF 3 which showed improvement in both the UC emission intensity and the lifetime.The enhancement could be attributed to the LaF 3 shell which could eliminate the nonradiative centers on the surface of LaF 3 :Yb 3+ ,Er 3+ NCs.Qian et al. [66] increased the emission intensity of NaYF 4 :Yb,Er@silica coreshell NPs by depositing an undoped NaYF 4 shell on the NaYF 4 :Yb,Er NPs before the silica coating (Figure 3).The total emission intensity of NaYF 4 :Yb,Er@NaYF 4 @silica coreshell NPs increased by 15 times compared to that without the intermediate NaYF 4 shell.The critical shell thickness of NaYF 4 was ∼3 nm, beyond which no further emission intensity enhancement was observed.
Yi et al. [67] reported a significant UC luminescence enhancement after growing YOF shell on the surface of YOF:Yb,Er core.They observed that the YOF shell enhanced the red emission band at ∼669 nm but suppressed the green emission band at ∼540 nm.The emission intensity at ∼669 nm was increased by ∼18.5 times after coating.A steady increase in the red/green emissions (R/G) ratio was observed during the growth of the NPs, which was due to host (matrix) effect of YOF.
In a sensitizer-activator UC system containing both sensitizer ions and activator ions [68], sensitizer ions could also be doped in the shell to make additional enhancement of UC luminescence.Vetrone et al. [69] demonstrated the synthesis of a novel NaGdF 4 :Yb,Er@NaGdF 4 :Yb activecore@active-shell architecture with great enhancement of UC luminescence.Yang et al. [70] also reported the synthesis of BaGdF 5 :Yb,Er@BaGdF 5 :Yb active-core@active-shell structured UCNCs with a controllable size from 3 to 10 nm.It was found that after coating, the active shell with altered concentrations of Yb 3+ ions in the shell, the luminescence intensity can be improved several hundred times.In contrast to the inert-shell-coated NPs, the main difference is that the active shell not only protects the luminescent ions from the nonradiative decay but also transfers absorbed radiation to the luminescent core.
Chen et al. [71] reported NaGdF 4 :Nd@NaGdF 4 core-shell near-infrared downconversion NPs with an average size of 15 nm and exceptionally high PL QY.The fact that both the excitation and PL of these NCs were in the biological window of optical transparency, combined with their high QE, spectral sharpness, and photostability, made them quite promising as optical biomaging probes.

The Possible Problem: Atom/Ion Diffusion in Core-Shell
Nanostructures.As we see, most of the researches of coreshell nanomaterials concentrate on the method of preparing core-shell structures and the improved luminescence properties, but little attention has been devoted to the diffusion of doped ions in the core-shell nanomaterials.Ningthoujam et al. [72] presented the possibility of Eu 3+ diffusion in YVO 4 :Eu 3+ @YVO 4 core-shell NPs.In this work, YVO 4 :Eu 3+ NPs and YVO 4 :Eu 3+ @YVO 4 core-shell NPs were prepared and heat treated from 500 to 900 ∘ C. Surface inhomogenities around Eu 3+ present on the surface of the YVO 4 :Eu 3+ core could be removed effectively by the undoped YVO 4 shell and resulted in improved luminescence from coreshell NPs compared to the core NPs.Another reason of luminescence improvement could be that a small fraction of Eu 3+ ions available on the surface of the core migrated into the YVO 4 shell and led to the increase of Eu 3+ -Eu 3+ distance and hence, reduced the extent of concentration quenching.
In view of this, the temperature of ions' diffusion and its influences on properties of core-shell nanomaterials should be investigated in order to achieve best luminescence properties.DiMaio et al. [73] studied the diffusion of Eu 3+ ions in LaF 3 :Eu 3+ @LaF 3 core-shell NPs under 650 ∘ C. At elevated temperatures, the diffusion of doped ions was significant enough to result in drastic color changes as emissions from higher-energy manifolds were no longer concentration quenched.In another work, Zheng et al. [74] observed Mn 2+ diffusion in MnS@ZnS core-shell NCs annealed at relatively lower temperatures (220-300 ∘ C).The diffusion of Mn 2+ in MnS@ZnS NCs from the MnS core to the nanocrystal surface resulted in the PL surface quenching.Therefore, highly efficient luminescent NCs could be obtained by growing a thin ZnS shell on a small-sized MnS core at low temperature, annealing the resulting NCs for effectively diffusing Mn 2+ into the ZnS shell at high temperature to form a ZnS:Mn diffusion layer, and overcoating a thicker ZnS shell as a passivating layer.
In a word, atom/ion diffusion should be concerned in the design and construction of core-shell nanostructures, especially when high temperature is required.If doped ions in particle core diffuse across shell to surface, then surface effect cannot be prevented any more and surface quenching of luminescence still remains.

Core-Shell Structure to Achieve Metal Enhanced Luminescence
The luminescence QE is given by QE =   /(  +  nr ), where   is the radiative transition rate, and  nr is the nonradiative transition rate.As aforementioned, core-shell structure can weaken the surface effect and thus reduce nonradiative transition rate, and ultimately improve the effective QE.In addition, enhancement of QE can also be expected if the radiative transition rate is increased, based on the above QE equation.
In 1960s, Strickler and Berg [75] discovered that the vibration dipole radiative decay rate increased as the increase of the refractive index of medium, and Srickler-Berg equation was given to describe the relationship of the two parameters, which indicated that placing luminescent species near the metal surface could be an effective way of improving sensitivity of luminescence detection.In the later 1970s, Drexhage approved that luminescent species distribution close to the surface of a metal such as gold and silver of their luminescent emission intensity was greatly increased compared to the free state luminescent emission intensity [76,77], and a theoretical explanation was given [78,79].The laboratory led by Professor Lakowics of the University of Maryland studied this particular phenomenon of luminescence enhanced effect from both theoretical and experimental aspects and applied it in the field of biosensing and biomedical [80][81][82][83][84]. Metal enhanced luminescence (MEL) is a through-space effect.That is, there would be enhanced luminescence only if there is a certain distance between the luminescent species to the metal surface.The energy of luminescent species under the excited state will transfer to the matrix in the form of nonradiative transition when the distance is below 5 nm.The extent of quenching effect is inversely proportional to the cube of the distance [85].The radiative transition rate of the luminescent species will rise when the distance is 5-20 nm [25].This will result in the enhancement of QY, which is more prominent in the low QY luminescent species.In this distance, the enhancement of surface local electromagnetic field activates molecules close to the metal surface and leads to promotion of excitation efficiency, which is also beneficial to enhancement of luminescence QY.Mechanisms of MEL were summarized by Geddes and Lakowicz [26].
The metal-fluorophore interactions result in an increase in the quantum yield (i.e., emission intensity) of the fluorophore and a decrease in the lifetime of fluorophores owing to two phenomena: an enhanced local electric field and an increase in the intrinsic system decay rate.The first factor provides stronger excitation rates but does not modify the fluorescence lifetime of the molecules.The second factor increases the net nanoparticle quantum yield.Excellent demonstrations of MEL was made by Aslan et al. [86][87][88], who reported that by growing a layer of silica shell with fluorophores embedded within it on the nanoparticle of Ag, the emission intensity was about 20-fold larger than that of the nanobubbles without Ag core.Zeng et al. [89] also designed Au@SiO 2 core-shell NPs to enhance the efficiency of FRET based on QDs and R-phycoerythrin (RPE) in solution.Li et al. [90] synthesized carbon dots adsorbed Ag@SiO 2 core-shell NPs and obtained a more than four-fold increase of luminescence intensity of carbon dots.
As we mentioned before, there would be enhanced luminescence only if there is a certain distance between the luminescent species to the metal surface.Thus, the thickness of the spacer between the luminescent species and the metal is a critical parameter for the achievement of MEL.Zhang et al. [91] systematically increased the silica spacer thickness to optimize Ag@SiO 2 @Y 2 O 3 :Er nanostructure UC materials, and the average PL intensity reached a maximum value of 4-fold larger than that of the pure Y 2 O 3 :Er at an optimal silica spacer thickness of 30 nm.Ge et al. [92] observed that with the increase of silica dielectric thickness, the green UC emission intensity of Au@SiO 2 @Y 2 O 3 :Yb,Er core-shell NPs increased and reached a maximum of 9.59-fold enhancement when silica thickness is ∼40 nm (Figure 4).Yuan et al. [93] synthesized NaYF 4 :Yb,Er@SiO 2 core-shell structures with Ag NPs of two different sizes (15 and 30 nm) attaching to the surface of silica shell.Optimum UC luminescence enhancement was observed over a separation distance of 10 nm, and the maximum enhancement factors of 14.4-fold and 10.8-fold were observed when 15 and 30 nm Ag NPs were respectively used.It was also noted that dependence of the luminescence intensity on the separation distance between the metal NPs and chromophores was stronger for 15 nm Ag NPs compared to 30 nm.As the separation distance increased, both radiative decay and energy transfer processes would slow down, whereas the radiative decay rate changed less rapidly with the separation distance for larger metal NPs compared to smaller NPs.
Li et al. [94] reported that the UC emission intensity of NaYF 4 :Yb,Er,Gd nanorods increased when the nanorods were coupled with gold NPs, but the UC emission intensity suppressed when the nanorods were surrounded by continuous Au shells.Since there was no spacer between the luminescent material and metal, quenching mechanism might compete with the enhancement mechanism close to the surface of nanorods.In the case of an Au shell completely surrounding the UC nanorod, the Au was allocated so compact that additional quenching prevailed.Moreover, the condensed gold shell might block the emission transmittance from the UC nanorods.

Core-Shell Structure to Further Optimize Luminescence Properties of Nanoparticles
Weakening surface effect is to inhibit the negative factors in luminescence of NPs, while metal enhancement effect can promote the positive ones.It is possible to further optimize luminescence properties of core-shell NPs by combining the two paths together and the following points should be noted in design, and preparation of core-shell NPs.
(a) The noble metal is preferably located within the core.If the metal is located outside, its density should not be too high in order to avoid blocking of transmittance.
(b) The distance between metal and luminescent species should be controlled within a certain range.
(c) Lattice mismatch between core and shell should be minimized to prevent interface defects and luminescence quenching.
(d) Annealing is commonly needed to improve crystalline of NPs and to reduce defects.
(e) Thermal diffusion of atoms/ions in the shell of NPs should be concerned.

Conclusions and Outlook
This review seeks to summarize recent developments in optimizing luminescence properties of doped inorganic NPs with core-shell structures.Core-shell nanostructures can effectively prevent the influence of surface effect and reduce the nonradiative transition rate in NPs accordingly.On the other hand, MEL based core-shell structures can increase the radiative transition rate and excitation efficiency.Therefore, it is very promising to further optimize luminescence properties by combining the above two strategies into one core-shell nanostructure, despite the fact that the engineering and synthesis of such a complex nanostructure remain challenging.In addition, some other factors should be carefully considered when synthesizing doped core-shell NPs, such as nanoscale diffusion of atom/ion.

Figure 1 :
Figure 1: Publications per year for core-shell NPs during the period 2001 to 2012.The data was collected from Web of Science Database, using the keyword "core-shell nanoparticles" in the theme.

Figure 2 :
Figure 2: Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) photographs of silica-coated Y 2 O 3 :Tm 3+ ,Yb 3+ NPs for the sintering time of 60 min and the coating time of 30 min (a), 60 min (b), 90 min (c), and 120 min (d), respectively.The upper inset (c) shows the electron diffraction (ED) pattern of noncrystalline silica shells and the lower inset is the corresponding ED pattern of crystalline Y 2 O 3 :Tm 3+ ,Yb 3+ core [44].Copyright 2008 American Institute of Physics.