Journal of Nanotechnology

Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 472132, 5 pages

http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/472132

Research Article

Properties of Electrospun TiO₂ Nanofibers

Bianca Caratão,¹ Edgar Carneiro,¹ Pedro Sá,² Bernardo Almeida,² and Sandra Carvalho1,3

¹GRF-CFUM, University of Minho, Campus of Azurém, 4800-058 Guimarães, Portugal

²CFUM, University of Minho, Campus of Gualtar, 4700-057 Braga, Portugal

³SEG-CEMUC Mechanical Engineering Department, University of Coimbra, 3030-788 Coimbra, Portugal

Received 6 February 2014; Accepted 19 May 2014; Published 3 June 2014

Academic Editor: Valery Khabashesku

Copyright © 2014 Bianca Caratão et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

Titanium oxide filled polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) composite nanofibers have been prepared via a simple electrospinning technique. The combination of good TiO₂ properties with its high surface area leads these nanofibers into having a vast applicability such as cosmetics, scaffolds for tissue engineering, catalytic devices, sensors, solar cells, and optoelectronic devices. The structural and chemical properties of the prepared samples have been studied. The presence of the TiO₂ phase on the nanofibers was confirmed. An anatase to rutile transformation was observed at 600°C. Regarding the thermogravimetric and differential thermal analysis (TGA/DTA), the TIP decomposition and the PVP evaporation at 225°C were verified.

1. Introduction

Electrospinning is a simple and versatile technique that is capable of producing nanofibers with diameters ranging from 50 to 500 nm [1]. This nanofiber preparation method has the advantages of easy deposition and versatile in the manufacture of polymeric materials, composites, and ceramics. The interest of this technique for producing ceramic nanofibers has grown exponentially since 2002 [1].

The electrospinning process involves a high voltage source connected to a needle and a metallic collector where the fibers are deposited [2]. The needle is attached to injection pump, where is the polymer solution or melt, and consists of the positive electrode. The collector is connected to the negative electrode, thus creating a potential difference. In this way the electric field created, stretches the drop that forms on the needle tip, which is then deformed into a conical shape (Taylor cone) [3]. When the applied electric field exceeds the surface tension of the drop, the solution is ejected in the form of an electrically charged jet, reaching the negative electrode which is the collector [4]. During this process, the solvent is evaporated resulting in the deposition of nanofibers over the collector. The diameter of the fibers can be adjusted by varying the rheological properties of the solution and turning the processing parameters [1, 5, 6].

The importance and applicability of nanofibers have been a common theme in the field of nanotechnology. These materials, due to their nanosize, enjoy a range of attractive properties compared to known materials, such as high ratio area/volume, flexibility of structures, and mechanical performance (stiffness and tensile strength) [5].

Titanium dioxide (TiO₂) or titania can be found in three different crystalline forms: anatase, rutile, and brookite. However, the rutile phase is thermodynamically more stable. TiO₂ is a semiconductor with interesting properties, such as transparency to visible light, a high refraction index, and a low absorption coefficient [6].

The formation of the nanofibers with TiO₂ is the only form of combining their elevated surface area and the TiO₂ intrinsic semiconductor properties, thereby opening an enormous potential of this material, for applications. The anatase is a more photoactive phase due to its low velocity recombination of photogenerated charges in its structure, thus, this TiO₂ phase has a vast applicability such as sensors, solar cells [7], optoelectronic devices, and catalytic devices [6, 8] that have an important role in disinfection applications or air and water cleaning [6]. The rutile phase, due to their low intrinsic photocatalytic activity, can be used in cosmetic field [9]. The nanofibers of rutile phase can also be applied in the medical area as scaffolds for tissue engineering [10, 11].

This study aims at producing titanium dioxide nanofibers to combine the advantages of this material with the simplicity and versatility of the electrospinning technique. Furthermore, it has the objective of studying the behavior of the TiO₂ nanofibers at elevated temperatures. This study is different from the known articles due to high temperatures. The main aim of this research is to study the influence of the concentration of the Ti(IV)-isopropoxide (TIP) in the production of TiO₂ nanofibers. And the second aim of this study is to understand what happens to the TiO₂ at different temperatures for optimizing functionality depending on the required application.

2. Materials and Methods

The solution comprises Ti(IV)-isopropoxide precursor, which is subsequently added to a solvent and acetic acid. For a better control of the rheological properties of the solution, it will be added to a polymer matrix, of polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP), forming a solution. This matrix was chosen due to its high molecular weight 1300000 g/mol, which ensures that even at low concentrations the solution presents pairing of chains, enough for its stretching through the action of the electric field [6, 12]. The polymer is solved in ethanol, which evaporates during deposition, along with the other solvents involved. This leaves a dry PVP/TIP set of nanofibers in the collector.

In order to determine the optimal solution for the production of titanium dioxide nanofibers, three solutions were prepared (Table 1). The production of A and B solutions was produced with the same quantity of polymeric matrix (PVP); however, the precursor (TIP) was reduced to half the quantity in order to find out if it was possible to reduce the cost of the solution without altering its efficiency. Knowing that the concentration of PVP in ethanol can be increased to 0.1 g/mL [13], solution C was made, with the same quantity of precursor as in solution A.

Table 1: Variations and different amounts of precursor and polymeric matrix.

Solutions
TIP + acetic acid
PVP + ethanol

A
1,5 mL + 3 mL
0,45 g + 10 mL

B
0,75 mL + 1,5 mL
0,45 g + 10 mL

C
1,5 mL + 3 mL
0,5 g + 5 mL

Each solution was mixed with the aid of a magnetic stirrer at room temperature until a homogeneous solution is reached.

The solutions were then inserted into the injection pump, containing a needle (stainless steel 0.5 mm in diameter) and a vertically attached electrospinning device. The needle was connected to a high voltage and the solution was deposited at a rate of 0.1 to 0.5 mm/h. A fan-shaped foil was used as a collector for better visualization of the nanofibers produced. The needle collector distance was 12 cm. The electric field created between the needle and the collector was 8 kV. The samples were deposited for 10 minutes at room temperature.

The nanofibers were calcinated at maximum temperature of 1400°C, in a Wire Wound Tube Furnace. To reach the calcination temperature a heating rate of 5°C/min was used. The isothermal plateau was maintained for 60 minutes and subsequent cooling was at the natural rate.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. The Effect of the Different Solutions Concentration

An EDS analysis of the nanofibers obtained each solution was carried out and showed the presence of TiO₂ (Table 2).

Table 2: Quantitative and qualitative analysis obtained by EDS.

Element

nanofibers of solution
TiK
OK

Wt%
At%
Wt%
At%

A
67,78
41,27
32,22
58,73

B
66,26
39,61
33,74
60,39

C
71,79
45,94
28,21
54,06

The scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analyses for the different solutions before and after calcination at 1200°C are shown in Figure 1. Calcination was carried out at this temperature with the objective of discovering if the nanofiber structure changes with the increase in temperature. Figure 1 illustrates a decrease in the nanofibers size from solution A to solution B after annealing. This behavior is explained by the decrease of the TIP precursor. The increase of the average diameter of the nanofiber mat from A to C is due to the higher concentration of polymer increasing the viscosity of the solution that leads to increased loads which initiate the fiber formation that may not be sufficient to stretch the solution to the fiber diameters as thin as desired (from 200 to 400 nm); these dimensions required for the nanofibers have good properties, such as high ratio area/volume, flexibility of structures, and mechanical performance [14].

Figure 1: SEM analysis of solutions (A), (B), and (C) before (1) and after calcining (2).

Changes in morphology before and after calcination are related with drastic change in the crystal structure [15–17]. One can also see that after annealing there is a reduction in the size of nanofibers, due to the PVP polymer evaporation and the TiO₂ crystallization [15].

Analyzing the nanofibers after annealing corresponding to precursor solutions of different concentrations, it was found that the sample corresponding to solution C contains nanofibers with 888 nm average diameter. This diameter is not within the envisaged interval from 200 to 400 nm. The fiber mat from solution A contains more defects than one formed from solution B. As such, it was concluded that the nanofibers corresponding to solution B were chosen for the subsequent analysis and tests. Through the analysis in Figure 1, it can be verified that with the increase in temperature the nanofiber structure does not alter; however, it causes an increase in TiO₂ crystals.

3.2. Effect of Temperature on TiO₂ Nanofibers

The nanofibers produced with solution B were calcined at different temperatures. Figure 2 represents the X-ray diffraction (XRD) spectra for the sample with different annealing temperatures. Also are the peak positions (vertical lines) corresponding to the anatase (ICDD 00-021-1272) and rutile (ICDD 00-021-1276) phases expected for TiO₂.

Figure 2: Graph representing the XRD of solution B TiO₂ nanofibers.

According to the XRD results (Figure 2) it appears that nanofibers calcinated at 400°C, temperature at which anatase crystals begin to form, have a nanocrystalline structure. At 600°C rutile starts to become more evident. However, the predominant phase is still anatase. With increasing temperature the rutile phase grows so that at 800°C it becomes the one that has a higher percentage in the samples, as expected [12, 15, 18].

With increasing temperature the grain size also increases; this increase in the grain size is due to the sudden increase of temperature. The grain size shown in Table 3 was determined by the Scherrer equation.

Table 3: Grain size and phase with changes of temperature.

Temperature (°C)
Crystallographic plane
Phase
Grain size (nm)

400
(011)
Amorphous
5.0

500
(011)
Anatase
8.4

600
(011)
15.7

700
(110)
Rutile
38.4

800
(110)
48.1

1000
(110)
64.2

1200
(110)
71.0

1400
(110)
613.0

The increase in grain size causes an increase in its thickness, thus, the atoms’ levels of energy will increase resulting in the reduction of its bandgap. Besides the bandgap, the grain size will affect the area’s surface; for a constant volume, the bigger the particle is, the less its surface area will be [19]. For anatase phase, the TiO₂ photovoltaic efficiency is improved with the decrease of the grain size; this is due to the increase in the photons absorption and improved interfacial characteristics [20]. For rutile phase with the decrease of grain size, their ability to dispersion visible light is reduced; however they maintain a high UV-scattering ability [21].

The differential thermal analysis (DTA) curve of heat flow, shown in Figure 3, indicates two transformations with increasing temperature. The first exothermic peak at 450.03°C corresponds to the anatase phase of TiO₂ while the second exothermic peak occurs at 788.03°C and corresponds to the transformation of the rutile phase. These results are in accordance with the X-ray diffraction and the literature [15, 22, 23].

Figure 3: Graph representing TiO₂ nanofibers’ DTA and TGA of solution B.

From the obtained TGA curves (Figure 3), the existence of three losses was verified. The first loss occurs at 72.40°C and is related to moisture and solvent loss (ethanol and acetic acid). The loss at 225.19°C is due to TIP decomposition in conjunction with the degradation of PVP dehydration through a polymer side chain. The loss at 424.41°C occurs due to the formation of anatase crystals. These transformations are in agreement with the literature [15, 22, 23].

4. Conclusion

TiO₂ nanofibers with average diameter of 206 mm were successfully produced through the electrospinning technique. It was found that the best TiO₂ nanofibers are obtained from solution B that contains 0.75 mL TIP (in 1.5 mL acetic acid) and 0.45 g PVP (in 10 mL ethanol). The scanning electron microscope allowed for the nanofibers absorption before and after calcination; this proved that its structure is maintained with the increase in temperature, all that occurs is the increase in TiO₂ crystal size. The structural transformation from anatase to rutile occurs in the range 600°C and 800°C. These results were confirmed through DSC studies. For applications that require an anatase phase, the TiO₂ will have to be annealed at a temperature equal or lower than 600°C. Regarding the TGA study, the TIP decomposition and PVP evaporation through dehydration in the polymer lateral chain were verified at 225°C.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests regarding to the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

This research is sponsored by FEDER funds through the program COMPETE—“Programa Operacional Factores de Competitividade”—and by national funds through FCT—“Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia”—in the framework of the Strategic Projects PEST-C/FIS/UI607/2011 and the project Matepro—Optimizing Materials and Processes, ref. NORTE-07-0124-FEDER-000037, and it is also cofunded by the “Programa Operacional Regional do Norte” (ON.2—O Novo Norte), under the “Quadro de Referência Estratégico Nacional” (QREN), through the “Fundo Europeu de Desenvolvimento 8 Regional” (FEDER).

References

I. S. Chronakis, “Novel nanocomposites and nanoceramics based on polymer nanofibers using electrospinning process—a review,” Journal of Materials Processing Technology, vol. 167, no. 2-3, pp. 283–293, 2005.

W. E. Teo and S. Ramakrishna, “A review on electrospinning design and nanofibre assemblies,” Nanotechnology, vol. 17, no. 14, pp. R89–R106, 2006.

P. K. Panda and S. Ramakrishna, “Electrospinning of alumina nanofibers using different precursors,” Journal of Materials Science, vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 2189–2193, 2007.

N. M. Thoppey, J. R. Bochinski, L. I. Clarke, and R. E. Gorga, “Edge electrospinning for high throughput production of quality nanofibers,” Nanotechnology, vol. 22, no. 34, Article ID 345301, 2011.

R. Ramaseshan, S. Sundarrajan, R. Jose, and S. Ramakrishna, “Nanostructured ceramics by electrospinning,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 102, no. 11, Article ID 111101, 2007.

J. Watthanaarun, V. Pavarajarn, and P. Supaphol, “Titanium (IV) oxide nanofibers by combined sol-gel and electrospinning techniques: preliminary report on effects of preparation conditions and secondary metal dopant,” Science and Technology of Advanced Materials, vol. 6, no. 3-4, pp. 240–245, 2005.

K. Fujihara, A. Kumar, R. Jose, S. Ramakrishna, and S. Uchida, “Spray deposition of electrospun TiO₂ nanorods for dye-sensitized solar cell,” Nanotechnology, vol. 18, no. 36, Article ID 365709, pp. 1–5, 2007.

K. Nakata and A. Fujishima, “TiO₂ photocatalysis: design and applications,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology C: Photochemistry Reviews, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 169–189, 2012.

T. Picatonotto, D. Vione, and M. Eugenia Carlotti, “Effect of some additives used in the cosmetic field on the photocatalytic activity of rutile,” Journal of Dispersion Science and Technology, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 845–852, 2002.

A. R. Boccaccini, J. J. Blaker, V. Maquet, W. Chung, R. Jérôme, and S. N. Nazhat, “Poly(D,L-lactide) (PDLLA) foams with TiO₂ nanoparticles and PDLLA/TiO₂-Bioglass foam composites for tissue engineering scaffolds,” Journal of Materials Science, vol. 41, no. 13, pp. 3999–4008, 2006.

Z. Ma, M. Kotaki, R. Inai, and S. Ramakrishna, “Potential of nanofiber matrix as tissue-engineering scaffolds,” Tissue Engineering, vol. 11, no. 1-2, pp. 101–109, 2005.

D. Reyes-Coronado, G. Rodríguez-Gattorno, M. E. Espinosa-Pesqueira, C. Cab, R. de Coss, and G. Oskam, “Phase-pure TiO₂ nanoparticles: anatase, brookite and rutile,” Nanotechnology, vol. 19, no. 14, Article ID 145605, 2008.

M. Sangmanee and S. Maensiri, “Nanostructures and magnetic properties of cobalt ferrite (CoFe₂O₄) fabricated by electrospinning,” Applied Physics A, vol. 97, no. 1, pp. 167–177, 2009.

S. Tungprapa, T. Puangparn, M. Weerasombut et al., “Electrospun cellulose acetate fibers: effect of solvent system on morphology and fiber diameter,” Cellulose, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 563–575, 2007.

W. Nuansing, S. Ninmuang, W. Jarernboon, S. Maensiri, and S. Seraphin, “Structural characterization and morphology of electrospun TiO₂ nanofibers,” Materials Science and Engineering B, vol. 131, no. 1–3, pp. 147–155, 2006.

P. Viswanathamurthi, N. Bhattarai, H. Y. Kim, and D. R. Lee, “Vanadium pentoxide nanofibers by electrospinning,” Scripta Materialia, vol. 49, no. 6, pp. 577–581, 2003.

S. Maensiri and W. Nuansing, “Thermoelectric oxide NaCo₂O₄ nanofibers fabricated by electrospinning,” Materials Chemistry and Physics, vol. 99, no. 1, pp. 104–108, 2006.

J.-A. Park, J. Moon, S.-J. Lee, S. H. Kim, T. Zyung, and H. Y. Chu, “Structural, electrical and gas sensing properties of eletrospun TiO₂ nanofibers,” Thin Solid Films, vol. 518, no. 22, pp. 6642–6645, 2010.

H. S. Lee, C. S. Woo, B. K. Youn et al., “Bandgap modulation of TiO₂ and its effect on the activity in photocatalytic oxidation of 2-isopropyl-6-methyl-4-pyrimidinol,” Topics in Catalysis, vol. 35, no. 3-4, pp. 255–260, 2005.

N. Xu, Z. Shi, Y. Fan, J. Dong, J. Shi, and M. Z.-C. Hu, “Effects of particle size of TiO₂ on photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue in aqueous suspensions,” Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 373–379, 1999.

S. Wiechers, P. Biehl, C. Luven et al., “Titanium dioxide particle size vs. sun protection performance,” Cosmetics & Toiletries, vol. 128, no. 5, pp. 2–6, 2013.

C. Tekmen, A. Suslu, and U. Cocen, “Titania nanofibers prepared by electrospinning,” Materials Letters, vol. 62, no. 29, pp. 4470–4472, 2008.

I. Cacciotti, A. Bianco, G. Pezzotti, and G. Gusmano, “Synthesis, thermal behaviour and luminescence properties of rare earth-doped titania nanofibers,” Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 166, no. 2, pp. 751–764, 2011.