Journal of Obesity
Volume 2019 (2019), Article ID 3412952, 12 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/3412952

Clinical Study

Double-Blind, Randomized, Three-Armed, Placebo-Controlled, Clinical Investigation to Evaluate the Benefit and Tolerability of Two Dosages of IQP-AE-103 in Reducing Body Weight in Overweight and Moderately Obese Subjects

Ralf Uebelhack,¹ Udo Bongartz,¹ Stephanie Seibt,² Gordana Bothe,² Pee Win Chong,³ Patricia De Costa,⁴ and Natalia Wszelaki³

¹analyze & realize GmbH, Weißenseer Weg 111, 10369 Berlin, Germany
²analyze & realize GmbH, Waldseeweg 6, 13467 Berlin, Germany
³Zaluvida Corporate Sdn Bhd, E-16 Plaza Mont Kiara, 2 Jalan Kiara, 50480 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
⁴InQpharm Group Sdn Bhd, E-16 Plaza Mont Kiara, 2 Jalan Kiara, 50480 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Correspondence should be addressed to Patricia De Costa; patricia@inqpharm.com

Received 21 November 2018; Revised 13 December 2018; Accepted 19 December 2018; Published 3 February 2019

Academic Editor: Gordon Fisher

Copyright © 2019 Ralf Uebelhack et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

Objective. This study was performed to determine the efficacy and tolerability/safety of IQP-AE-103 on body weight reduction in overweight to moderately obese adults. Methods. A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial involved one hundred and eight subjects (BMI between 25 and 35 kg/m²) that were randomly assigned to either the low-dose or the high-dose IQP-AE-103 group, or the placebo group. Following a 2-week run-in period, subjects received two capsules of investigational product after three daily main meals for 12 weeks. Subjects were instructed to maintain a nutritionally balanced hypocaloric diet according to the individual’s energy requirement. Body weight, body fat, and waist and hip circumference were measured at baseline, and after 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks. Subjects also rated their feelings of hunger and fullness using visual analogue scales, and food craving on a 5-point scale at the same time intervals. Blood samplings for safety laboratory parameters were taken before and at the end of the study. Results. After 12 weeks of intake, the high-dose IQP-AE-103 group had a significantly greater weight loss compared with the placebo (5.03 ± 2.50 kg vs. 0.98 ± 2.06 kg, respectively; ) and the low-dose group (3.01 ± 2.19 kg; ). The high-dose group experienced a decrease in body fat of 3.15 ± 2.41 kg compared with a decrease of 0.23 ± 2.74 kg for the placebo group (). High-dose IQP-AE-103 also decreased the feeling of hunger in 66% subjects. A beneficial effect of IQP-AE-103 on the lipid metabolism was also demonstrated in the subgroup of subjects with baseline total cholesterol levels above 6.2 mmol/L. No side effects related to the intake of IQP-AE-103 were reported. Conclusions. These findings indicate that IQP-AE-103 could be an effective and safe weight loss intervention. This trial is registered with NCT03058367.

1. Introduction

The growing prevalence of overweight and obesity is a persistent international problem. Overweight (BMI from 25.0 to 29.9) and obesity (BMI of 30 and higher) are defined as excessive accumulation and storage of fat in the body. Obesity is a serious chronic disease that has far-ranging negative implications on many systems in the human body. With the rise of BMI and body weight, the risks for type 2 diabetes, fatty liver, ischemic heart disease, hypertension, stroke, obstructive sleep apnea, and certain cancers such as breast and colon cancers grow significantly [1–4]. Obesity was also found to increase the risk of depression caused by disparagement of body image and negative emotional reaction to dieting [5], leading to job absenteeism, lowering productivity, and driving healthcare costs [6, 7]. In the United States alone, obesity-related diseases medical care costs up to $210 billion annually [8]. Therefore, successful and sustainable body weight management is not only crucial for human health but also for the economy. As per recently published public health guidelines of National Institute for Health and Care Excellence and a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Obesity Society, losing 3% of baseline body weight is already associated with health benefits [9–11]. Moderate weight loss of 5% was shown to decrease the plasma concentrations of some risk factors for cardiometabolic disease and obstructive sleep apnea (glucose, insulin, triglyceride, alanine transaminase, HDL cholesterol, and leptin) [10–13].

There are many factors contributing to overweight or obesity such as physical inactivity, poor diet, high calorie intake, genetics, or the way the body uses energy. Hence, reducing body weight and calorie intake, introducing balanced diet, and increasing physical activity are critical to achieve weight loss. Pharmaceutical drug therapies are indicated when lifestyle intervention alone is unsuccessful. However, the vast majority of the currently available therapies are associated with unpleasant or even serious adverse effects. Many anti-obesity drugs that have been approved by health authorities have eventually been withdrawn from the market due to serious adverse events, for example, sibutramine or rimonabant, leaving limited options, for example, orlistat. But orlistat has also a long list of side effects, such as fecal incontinence, oily spotting, diarrhea, or even more severe side effects such as serious liver injury [14–16]. Since weight loss is a long-term treatment, anti-obesity medications should have good tolerability and be free of side effects. For this reason, new strategies have to be developed to combat this complex health condition.

Plants have always been a good source of new potential and natural therapies for illnesses, including body weight management products. Litramine®, a natural fibre complex derived from Opuntia ficus-indica, enriched with soluble fibres from Acacia sp., has been shown in a number of clinical trials to safely and effectively reduce and maintain weight loss [17–20]. Litramine® has been demonstrated to reduce dietary fat absorption and increase fecal fat excretion, resulting in lower calorie absorption from diet, which leads to weight loss [20, 21].

IQP-AE-103 is a combination of dehydrated powder of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench) pods and inulin, a heterogeneous mixture of fructose polymers extracted from chicory roots. Okra pods are a widely consumed vegetable, eaten raw or cooked, used in salads, soups, and stews. In stews, okra acts also as a thickening agent, increasing the viscosity of the liquid. Research by Bakre and Jaiyeaoba demonstrated that dehydrated powder derived from okra pods has high swelling capabilities [22]. Due to this physicochemical property, okra pods can potentially induce satiety and fullness and help to control the calorie intake [22, 23]. Additionally, okra pods contain dietary fibre and proteins [23], which may play a role in fat binding, thus decreasing absorption of dietary fat and consequently leading to body weight reduction [24]. Inulin is a generic name covering all β-(2 → 1) fructans. The presence of these bonds makes inulin indigestible by the human enzymes. Inulin is, therefore, associated with low caloric value. However, these bonds are fermentable by colonic bacteria; thus, inulin can be considered a good source of prebiotics [25, 26]. The health benefits of inulin have been demonstrated in a number of clinical studies and include weight loss [27], modulation of intestinal/fecal microflora [28, 29], and improvement of bowel movements in elderly constipated subjects [29].

In addition, a combination of dehydrated okra pod powder and inulin, the active ingredients in IQP-AE-103, has been shown to be a strong fat-binding agent in an in vitro setting simulating in vivo conditions (data not shown); it also exerts high swelling capacity and significantly enhances solution viscosity. Thus, IQP-AE-103 appears to be a promising natural agent that may help to control calorie intake, decrease absorption of dietary fat, and consequently lead to body weight reduction.

In this study, we investigated the efficacy and tolerability/safety of IQP-AE-103 for reducing body weight in overweight and obese subjects.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Participants

One hundred and eight (108) generally healthy, overweight, to moderately obese (BMI ≥25 and <35 kg/m²) male and female volunteers between 18 and 65 years of age participated in the study. Other inclusion criteria were a consistent and stable body weight for 3 months prior to recruitment, being accustomed to 3 meals daily, commitment to adhere to the study’s dietary recommendation, use of contraception in women of childbearing potential, maintenance of habitual level of physical activity during the study, and avoiding other weight management products or programs. Main exclusion criteria included hypersensitivity to the ingredients, pregnancy or nursing, smoking cessation within 6 months prior to the study, abuse of drugs and alcohol, diabetes mellitus type 1, uncontrolled diabetes mellitus type 2, relevant endocrine disorders (e.g., uncontrolled thyroid disorders), eating disorders, recent history of gastrointestinal surgery, acute and chronic gastrointestinal disorders, and use of medications that may affect body weight or gastrointestinal functions. All subjects gave written informed consent voluntarily. The clinical trial was approved by the ethics committee of Charité–University Medicine Berlin and was performed in compliance with principles of the World Health Organization (Declaration of Helsinki) [30] and the EU recommendations for Good Clinical Practice (EMA/CHMP/ICH/135/95), E6 (R2) [31].

2.2. Interventions

Subjects underwent a 2-week run-in phase to assess the compliance to the study requirements and the recommended dietary regimen, before randomization for the 12-week treatment phase. Subjects were randomly allocated to either IQP-AE-103 high dose, IQP-AE-103 low dose, or the placebo group according to the randomization code provided by an independent statistician. Subjects were instructed to take two capsules of the investigational product three times daily, 15 minutes after each main meal (breakfast, lunch, and dinner), with a glass of water (250 ml). Each capsule of IQP-AE-103 high dose contained 330 mg dehydrated okra powder and 85 mg inulin, whereas low-dose capsules contained half the amount of okra powder and inulin; and placebo capsules contained standard excipients. All the capsules were identical in size and appearance. Dehydrated okra powder was obtained from whole okra pods (Abelmoschus esculentus) that were cleaned, sliced, oven-dried at 60°C, and milled to form a fine powder. Inulin was extracted from freshly sliced chicory roots using hot water, followed by filtration and purification by discoloration and decalcification. The materials were tested for microbiological activity and contaminants, and inulin was tested for purity. The daily dosage of IQP-AE-103 was determined based on data obtained from a previous animal study that has shown efficacy in preventing weight gain and in increasing fecal excretion (data not shown). Considering the mode of action of the product, that is, reducing dietary fat absorption, the daily dosage was divided into 3 equal doses to be consumed after 3 main meals.

Throughout the study, all subjects were instructed to follow a nutritionally balanced and hypocaloric diet plan, containing 30% fat, developed by a registered dietician. The daily basal energy requirement was estimated for each subject according to the Institute of Medicines’ equations taking into considerations sex, age, and actual body weight, and multiplying by a factor for physical activity level [32]. The estimated energy requirement was then reduced by 20% in order to achieve a mildly hypocaloric diet. Each subject was issued a diet plan according to individual energy requirement and given instruction to follow the diet plan. A sample of diet plan is shown in Table 1. Subjects had to record the items of the diet plan consumed, along with their calorie content, in a diary on 2 weekdays and 1 day of the weekend per week.

Table 1: Example of a diet plan consumed daily during the trial for a 1500 kcal diet.

Calories (kcal)
Meal
Food
Portion size
Quantity (g)

400
Breakfast
Toast bread
3 slices
80

Low-fat mozzarella (20% FDM)
1/2
62

Fresh tomato
3 medium
150

Olive oil
1 tsp
5

Kiwi
1
40

100
Snack
Rye-wheat bread
1/2 slice
25

Butter
1/2 tsp
2

Cottage cheese (20% FDM)
2 heaped tsp
30

500
Lunch
Pork stew
1/5 portion
100

Oil (e.g., rapeseed)
2 tsp
10

Carrot
3 medium
150

Onion
1 large
50

Potato
To be weighed on a scale
350

100
Snack
Natural low fat yoghurt (1.5% FDM)
1/3 large cups
150

Banana
1/4 medium
25

Sesame seeds
1/2 tsp
2

400
Supper
Rye-wheat bread
2 thin slices
80

Butter
1/2 tsp
10

Gouda (45% FDM)
1/2 slice
15

Turkey breast
1 slice
15

Chicory
2 medium
150

Orange
1 medium
100

Honey
1 tsp
5

tsp, teaspoon; FDM, fat in dry matter.

2.3. Measurements

Subjects were followed up through scheduled visits with investigators after 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks of interventions. Given the short intervals between the visits, no regular phone calls were scheduled; however, the subjects were free to contact the study sites as needed. Body weight was measured in barefoot subjects wearing underwear at each visit, whereas body composition was measured by bioimpedance method; both measurements were taken using validated electronic weighing scale (Tanita BC-420 MA). Subjects’ standing height was measured with a wall-mounted stadiometer. Waist circumference (cm) was measured at the level midway between the lateral lower rib margin and the iliac crest, whereas hip circumference (cm) was measured as the maximal circumference over the buttocks.

To provide initial insight into potential effects of the investigational product on appetite/satiety, subjects were asked to provide a retrospective subjective assessment of the overall feeling of hunger, fullness, and food craving for the last 3 days prior to the respective study visit. For the evaluation of hunger and fullness, a visual analogue scale (VAS) was used, respectively. VASs used (100 mm in length, with expressions for most negative and most positive ratings anchored at each end) were based on the original tools used in appetite research to measure the acute sensations following a test meal [33]. The retrospective assessment per se has not been validated but was used in previous research [34]. To assess the feeling of food craving, a 5-point rating scale (0 = “no,” 1 = “slightly,” 2 = “moderate,” 3 = “strong,” and 4 = “very strong”) was used to reply to a general single question if the subject had experienced any craving. Generally, a 5-point scale has been considered reliable [35]; however, the specific use for food craving rating has not been clinically validated.

Stool frequency was assessed based on bowel movements recorded in the subject diaries 3 days a week. Physical activity was recorded using validated International Physical Activity Questionnaire, Short Form (IPAQ-SF) [36] during all study visits from visit 2 to visit 6.

Blood lipid parameters, fasted glucose, and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) were assessed at visit 1 and visit 6.

Safety evaluation included measurement of laboratory parameters (full blood count, clinical chemistry, liver and renal functions and fat-soluble vitamins (A, D, E, and K) levels) and urine analysis at visit 1 and visit 6, as well as assessment of vital signs during each visit. Adverse events were recorded, regardless of causality at every visit. Global evaluation of tolerability by subjects and investigators was performed at the end of the study.

Compliance regarding the intake of the investigational products was evaluated by the collection of unused capsules. The overall compliance (%) was defined as (the total number of capsules taken divided by the total number of capsules to be taken) multiplied by 100. The total number of capsules to be taken was calculated per subject, taking into account the actual length of the IP consumption period.

2.4. Statistical Methods and Sample Size Determination

The primary endpoint of this study was the comparison of the mean body weight (kg) change between IQP-AE-103 high dose and placebo after 12 weeks of intervention from baseline, in overweight and moderately obese subjects. The evaluation of the efficacy of IQP-AE-103 was based on the null hypothesis that there are no statistical differences between IQP-AE-103 and placebo in mean reduction of body weight after 12 weeks of treatment. The nonparametric Mann–Whitney U test for independent samples was applied. The testing was carried out by the determination of the rank sum of individual body weight changes.

All other efficacy as well as the safety and concurrent variables were exploratively examined and were descriptively assessed. For the metric data (continuous data), the statistical characteristics were given (number, mean, standard deviation, median, extremes, quartiles, and 95% confidence interval of mean). For ordinal data (discrete data), frequency distribution was performed. All nominal data (categorical data) were summarized using frequency tables. All variables were evaluated primarily by exact nonparametric procedures:

(i)Kruskal–Wallis test for more than two independent groups (comparison of groups or subgroups)(ii)Mann–Whitney U test for independent groups (comparison of groups or subgroups)(iii)Wilcoxon test for dependent groups (comparison of pre-post within groups or subgroups)(iv)Fisher’s exact test for comparison of percentage.

For all statistical analyses, the level of significance () was assumed. Efficacy and safety data were analyzed based on full analysis set (FAS) population, which was defined as subjects who have received at least one dose of the investigational product and had a baseline and at least one postbaseline assessment. All statistical analyses were done using the SPSS statistic software, V22.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL).

The sample size estimation was determined by the Cohen’s effect size (group comparison), as well as the previously determined requirements of the significance level of 5.0% (two tailed) and power of 80%. As no clinical data were available for IQP-AE-103 at the study initiation that may be used as basis for the sample size calculation, estimation was based on a comparable clinical trial [37]. In this study, the body weight reduction after 12 weeks of the treatment with verum represented 3.8 ± 1.8 kg compared with placebo (1.4 ± 2.6 kg). The difference of 2.4 kg reflects a large effect (effect size of 1.0). This effect size was considered suitable for a sample size calculation of the present study. In consideration of the nonparametric test procedure, the necessary sample size was equal to 28 subjects per study arm. Considering the dropout rate of 20% and the block randomization with the block size of 6, a total sample size of 36 subjects per study group (total 108 subjects) was recommended. No dropout was replaced.

3. Results

This double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study was conducted between April and November 2017. One hundred and eight (108) subjects were randomized into three groups. Seven subjects were excluded from the full analysis set (FAS) and the safety population as they attended only baseline visit and did not receive any investigational product. Flowchart of the study population is given in Figure 1. The baseline characteristics of the three study groups are given in Table 2. There was no statistically significant difference between the study groups in gender distribution, age, body height, body weight, BMI, energy requirement, waist circumference, hip circumference, body fat mass, and fat-free mass. Mean subject age was 47.5 ± 12.4 years, with a higher percentage of female subjects than male subjects in each treatment group. 107 subjects were Caucasian, whereas for one subject, the ethnicity was neither Caucasian nor Asian, however not further specified. The compliance with the intake of the investigational product was assessed on subjects who completed all study visits. 99.1% () subjects were compliant in the low-dose group and 99.0% () in the high-dose group vs. 99.9% () subjects in the placebo group. There were no statistically significant differences in the intake of the investigational product related to the capsules consumed between the study groups ().

Figure 1: Flowchart of the study population. IP = investigational product, LD = low dose, HD = high dose, v = visit, FAS = full analysis set.

Table 2: Demographic and baseline characteristics.

Parameter
FAS population

IQP-AE-103 LD ()
IQP-AE-103 HD ()
Placebo ()

Gender

    Men
8 (22.9%)
9 (25.7%)
9 (29%)

    Women
27 (77.1%)
26 (74.3%)
22 (71%)

Mean age (years)
46.8 ± 12.3
48.7 ± 12.8 
46.7 ± 12.2

Age group

    18–40 years
9 (25.7%)
9 (25.7%)
11 (35.5%)

    41–65 years
26 (74.3%)
26 (74.3%)
20 (64.5%)

Height (cm)
169.5 ± 10.6
168.8 ± 8.9
168.7 ± 11.0

Body weight (kg)
84.42 ± 14.89
84.04 ± 10.56
86.77 ± 15.27

BMI (kg/m²)
29.15 ± 2.17
29.44 ± 2.31
30.25 ± 2.59

Energy requirement (kcal)
2193.7 ± 473.9
2158.7 ± 328.0
2230.2 ± 450.6

Waist circumference (cm)
102.7 ± 10.0
100.9 ± 7.5
104.7 ± 11.4

Hip circumference (cm)
107.1 ± 7.8
106.9 ± 7.1
108.5 ± 6.9

Body fat mass (kg)
30.90 ± 6.81
30.77 ± 6.51
31.44 ± 7.34

Fat-free mass (kg)
53.52 ± 11.98
53.29 ± 9.11
55.33 ± 13.27

All data are presented as mean ± s.d. No significant difference was found between groups for all variables. FAS = full analysis set; LD = low dose; HD = high dose.

At baseline, the study groups did not differ in the body weight. However, body weight significantly decreased from baseline to week 12 in the high-dose IQP-AE-103 vs. placebo group, 5.03 ± 2.50 kg vs. 0.98 ± 2.06 kg (). A significant reduction in body weight was also observed in the low-dose IQP-AE-103 group (3.01 ± 2.19 kg) compared to placebo (). The difference in body weight reduction between the high- and the low-dose groups of IQP-AE-103 is also significant (). Mean body weight changes over the study course are presented in Figure 2 (percentage relative to baseline) and Table 3 (kg loss from baseline), respectively. Mean changes in primary and secondary parameters between baseline and week 12 are summarized in Table 4. Body weight reduction for high-dose IQP-AE-103 was observed as early as at week 2 (0.87 ± 1.16 vs. 0.34 ± 0.95, for comparison with placebo, strong trend) and achieved significance versus placebo from week 4 (1.91 ± 1.39 kg vs. 0.78 ± 1.44 kg, ) and onwards. In addition, at week 12, a total of 88.6% subjects in the high-dose IQP-AE-103 group lost at least 3% body weight in contrast to only 19.4% in the placebo arm (), whereas in the low-dose IQP-AE-103 group, the responder rate was 80% ( vs. placebo). Moreover, at least 5% weight loss was observed for 60% of subjects in the high-dose IQP-AE-103 group, in comparison to 28.6% in the low-dose group () and 6.5% in the placebo group (). Responder rates are presented in Figure 3. The subgroup of overweight subjects (BMI 25 to <30 kg/m²) had a significant weight loss in both low-dose (3.33 ± 1.70 kg, ) and high-dose IQP-AE-103 groups (4.72 ± 2.33 kg, ), compared with the placebo group (0.95 ± 2.03 kg), each after 12 weeks of treatment. In moderately obese subjects (BMI 30 to <35 kg/m²), body weight was significantly reduced in comparison with placebo only in the high-dose IQP-AE-103 group (5.39 ± 2.72 kg vs. 1.01 ± 2.16 kg; ) after 12 weeks. Relative to the baseline body weight, overweight subjects in the high-dose group lost on average 5.8% of their body weight at the end of the study, whereas the low-dose group and the placebo group lost 4.3% and 1.3%, respectively. Moderately obese subjects on the other hand lost on average 6.1%, 2.5%, and 1.1% for high-dose, low-dose, and placebo groups, respectively. Subgroup analysis of body weight loss according to age groups was also performed. For subjects aged 18–40 years, high-dose IQP-AE-103 resulted in 3.71 ± 2.30 kg weight loss, compared with 1.40 ± 2.94 kg in low-dose group and 0.82 ± 2.16 kg in placebo group, after 12 weeks. Statistically significant difference in weight loss was only showed comparing high-dose and placebo groups, . On the other hand, for subjects aged 41–65 years, high-dose IQP-AE-103 resulted in 5.48 ± 2.44 kg weight loss, compared with 3.56 ± 1.57 kg in low-dose group and 1.06 ± 2.06 kg in placebo group, over the same duration. Both high- and lose-dose IQP-AE-103 groups showed a significant weight loss when compared with the placebo group ( for both comparisons).

Figure 2: Mean body weight over time in percentage relative to baseline weight. LD = low dose; HD = high dose. Error bars denote standard error of mean. (a) significant vs. placebo and (b) significant vs. IQP-AE-103 LD.

Table 3: Mean body weight changes throughout the study. Full analysis set.

Body weight (kg), mean ± s.d.
IQP-AE-103 LD ()
IQP-AE-103 HD ()
Placebo ()

Baseline
84.42 ± 14.89
84.04 ± 10.56
86.77 ± 15.27

Week 2
83.83 ± 15.12
83.18 ± 10.35
86.43 ± 15.30

Week 4
83.18 ± 15.48
82.13 ± 10.35
85.99 ± 15.29

Week 8
82.44 ± 15.61
81.04 ± 10.35
85.89 ± 15.34

Week 12
81.41 ± 15.82
79.01 ± 9.89
85.79 ± 15.46

Baseline-week 2
0.59 ± 0.95
0.87 ± 1.16
0.34 ± 0.95

Baseline-week 4
1.24 ± 1.37
1.91 ± 1.39a
0.78 ± 1.44

Baseline-week 8
1.98 ± 1.81a
3.01 ± 1.69a,b
0.88 ± 1.87

Baseline-week 12
3.01 ± 2.19a
5.03 ± 2.50a,b
0.98 ± 2.06

LD = low dose; HD = high dose; asignificant difference vs. placebo; bsignificant difference vs. IQP-AE-103 LD.

Table 4: Mean changes (reduction) in primary and secondary parameters from baseline to week 12.

Parameters
FAS population

IQP-AE-103 LD ()
IQP-AE-103 HD ()
Placebo ()

Mean ± s.d.
values, vs. placebo
Mean ± s.d.
values, vs. placebo
Mean ± s.d.

Body weight (kg)
3.01 ± 2.19
<0.001
5.03 ± 2.50
<0.001
0.98 ± 2.06

BMI (kg/m²)
1.09 ± 0.75
<0.001
1.75 ± 0.83
<0.001
0.34 ± 0.77

Waist circumference (cm)
2.5 ± 2.4
0.001
4.1 ± 3.3
<0.001
0.9 ± 1.6

Hip circumference (cm)
2.8 ± 2.5
0.001
4.0 ± 3.0
<0.001
0.9 ± 1.2

Body fat mass (kg)
2.62 ± 3.83
0.005
3.15 ± 2.41
<0.001
0.23 ± 2.74

Fat-free mass (kg)
0.39 ± 3.68
0.931
1.80 ± 2.38
0.124
0.75 ± 2.93

FAS = full analysis set; LD = low dose; HD = high dose.

Figure 3: Responder rate for subjects who lost ≥3% and ≥5% of initial body weight at v6. LD = low dose; HD = high dose. a vs. placebo; b vs. placebo; c vs. low-dose group.

The mean reduction in waist circumference was more pronounced in both IQP-AE-103 groups, compared with that in the placebo group at the end of the study. Subjects in the high-dose IQP-AE-103 arm had a mean reduction in waist circumference of 4.1 ± 3.3 cm, whereas the mean reduction in the low-dose IQP-AE-103 arm was 2.5 ± 2.4 cm, in contrast to only 0.9 ± 1.6 cm reported in the placebo group ( and versus placebo, respectively). Also, there were statistically significant differences in the percentage of subjects with reduction in hip circumference between the study groups at week 12, between high-dose IQP-AE-103 and the placebo group (91.4% vs. 54.8%; ), as well as between low-dose IQP-AE-103 and placebo groups (80% vs. 54.8%; ), however, not between low- and high-dose IQP-AE-103 groups (). No statistically significant differences in waist-to-hip ratio between the study groups were reported at week 12.

At the end of the study, significant reductions in mean BMI were seen in both high-dose (1.75 ± 0.83 kg/m², ) and low-dose (1.09 ± 0.75 kg/m², ) IQP-AE-103 subjects in comparison to the placebo group (0.34 ± 0.77 kg/m²).

There were statistically significant differences in reduction of body fat mass between the study groups at the end of the study (IQP-AE-103 high dose, vs. placebo; low dose, vs. placebo and high dose vs. low dose, ). Reduction of fat-free mass was observed over time in all the three study groups; however, there were no significant differences between the study groups.

66% of the subjects experienced a decreased feeling of hunger in the high-dose IQP-AE-103 group. Mean VAS for feeling of hunger decreased significantly from baseline to the end of the study by 9.3 ± 25.8 mm ( for pre-post change); however, the difference was not significant when compared with reduction in the placebo group (3.7 ± 22.6 mm, for pre-post change). Ratings for feeling of fullness and food cravings were not significantly changed during the course of the study in any of the study groups.

During the intervention period, no significant changes in fasting blood glucose and HbA1c levels were observed between the study groups. 67% of subjects in the IQP-AE-103 high-dose group had a reduction in triglyceride levels compared with 37% in the placebo group (). Changes in total/low-density lipoprotein (LDL)/high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol were not significant at the end of the study, but a post hoc subgroup analysis performed with subjects with baseline total cholesterol level above 6.2 mmol/L revealed pre-post reductions in total cholesterol of 1.22 ± 1.10 mmol/L (), 0.58 ± 0.90 mmol/L (), 0.13 ± 0.31 mmol/L (), and reductions in LDL cholesterol of 1.18 ± 1.06 mmol/L (), 0.49 ± 0.74 mmol/L (), and 0.23 ± 0.29 mmol/L (), in high-dose, low-dose IQP-AE-103, and placebo groups, respectively.

Furthermore, no change in physical activity was noted by analyzing data from IPAQ-SF. Mean stool frequency did not change significantly in any of the study arms throughout the study.

At the end of the study, 97.1% of the subjects in the high-dose IQP-AE-103 group and 85.3% in the low-dose group rated the benefits of the treatment as “good” or “very good” compared with 10% in the placebo group. However, investigator rated the benefit as “good” or “very good” for 94.1% and 85.3% of the subjects in high- and low-dose IQP-AE-103 groups, respectively, compared with 6.7% for placebo subjects.

No clinically significant changes in vital signs, safety laboratory parameters (Table 5), and urine analysis were observed in the study in either of the verum groups or the placebo group at week 12. A total of 12 adverse events were reported during the course of the study (6 in high-dose IQP-AE-103 group, 4 in low-dose IQP-AE-103 group, and 2 in the placebo group), which included upper respiratory tract infections, symptoms of common cold, urinary tract infection, dental root inflammation, or lumbago. None of the reported adverse events were related to the administration of IQP-AE-103. Furthermore, tolerability was rated as “good” or “very good” by 100% of subjects in the two verum groups, comparable to 96.7% by the placebo group.

Table 5: Summary of changes in laboratory measurements during the study.

Measurements
Pre- to poststudy changes

Low-dose IQP-AE-103 (mean ± s.d.)
High-dose IQP-AE-10 (mean ± s.d.)
Placebo (mean ± s.d.)
value

Hemoglobin (mmol/l)
−0.08 ± 0.48
0.09 ± 0.63
−0.04 ± 0.75
NS

Hematocrit (l/l)
−0.003 ± 0.029
−0.003 ± 0.028
−0.001 ± 0.036
NS

Erythrocytes (Tpt/l)
0.01 ± 0.31
0.02 ± 0.34 
−0.02 ± 0.38
NS

Thrombocytes (Gpt/l)
8.6 ± 40.5
2.3 ± 42.1
0.8 ± 56.7
NS

Leukocytes (Gpt/l)
0.08 ± 1.55
−0.33 ± 1.65
0.16 ± 1.63
NS

Mean cell volume (fl)
−0.5 ± 3.5
−1.2 ± 5.4
0.1 ± 3.8
NS

Mean corpuscular hemoglobin (fmol/Ery)
−0.021 ± 0.058
0.013 ± 0.082
0.001 ± 0.076
NS

Mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (mmol/l)
−0.09 ± 0.95
0.24 ± 0.87
0.03 ± 0.96
NS

Alanine aminotransferase (μkat/l)
−0.075 ± 0.168
−0.035 ± 0.204
0.004 ± 0.211
NS

Aspartate aminotransferase (μkat/l)
−0.172 ± 0.483
−0.137 ± 0.566
0.028 ± 0.174
NS

Alkaline phosphatase (μkat/l)
0.026 ± 0.194
−0.150 ± 0.522
0.055 ± 0.305
NS

γ-Glutamyl transferase (μkat/l)
−0.083 ± 0.205
−0.042 ± 0.161
0.052 ± 0.346
NS

Bilirubin (μmol/l)
0.02 ± 6.76
4.35 ± 9.15
1.19 ± 7.89
NS

Creatinine (mmol/l)
0.26 ± 13.58
3.98 ± 9.37
1.92 ± 12.17
NS

Urea (mmol/l)
−0.17 ± 1.44
0.07 ± 1.24
−0.19 ± 1.32
NS

Uric acid (μmol/l)
−1.8 ± 60.9
−6.4 ± 77.3
11.7 ± 67.2
NS

Glucose (mmol/l)
−0.01 ± 0.63
0.01 ± 0.92
−0.16 ± 0.54
NS

Vitamin A (mg/l)
−0.002 ± 0.149
0.020 ± 0.173
0.063 ± 0.142
NS

Vitamin D (ng/l)
3.51 ± 13.45
4.37 ± 10.41
3.66 ± 11.79
NS

Vitamin E (mg/l)
−0.81 ± 3.11
−0.61 ± 3.07
1.09 ± 3.78
NS

Vitamin K (μg/l)
0.013 ± 1.197
0.086 ± 0.690
0.050 ± 0.689
NS

Vitamin K2mK4 (μg/l)
−0.002 ± 0.152
−0.022 ± 0.154
−0.031 ± 0.114
NS

Vitamin K2mK7 (μg/l)
0.143 ± 0.402
−0.157 ± 1.942
−0.086 ± 0.507
NS

Total cholesterol (mmol/l)
−0.08 ± 0.84
−0.30 ± 1.12
0.18 ± 1.09
NS

High-density lipoprotein cholesterol (mmol/l)
0.00 ± 0.39
0.10 ± 0.32
0.02 ± 0.39
NS

Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (mmol/l)
−0.02 ± 0.77
−0.34 ± 1.04
0.03 ± 0.86
NS

Triglycerides (mmol/l)
0.00 ± 0.79
−0.09 ± 0.76
0.13 ± 0.39
NS

HbA1c (%)
0.14 ± 0.35
0.03 ± 0.34
0.11 ± 0.20
NS

Values from the Kruskal–Wallis test.

4. Discussion

Based on the physicochemical properties of okra pods and inulin, and the fat binding capacity shown in vitro, it was hypothesized that a product containing powdered okra pods and inulin could potentially contribute to weight loss. Hence, the primary objective of this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical study was to evaluate the weight loss potential of IQP-AE-103 over the period of 12 weeks in overweight and moderately obese subjects. In this study, it was demonstrated that in conjunction with a hypocaloric diet, IQP-AE-103 at both low dose (990 mg okra and 255 mg inulin/day) and high dose (1980 mg okra and 510 mg inulin/day) causes significant weight loss and that the effects are greater than those in the placebo. Baseline body weight was reduced by 5.03 ± 2.50 kg in the high-dose group and by 3.01 ± 2.19 kg in the low-dose group, compared with 0.98 ± 2.06 kg in the placebo group. Also, for the high-dose group, weight loss effect due to IQP-AE-103 consumption was observed as early as at 2 weeks of treatment and was sustained over the course of the 12-week intake period. More importantly, the proportion of subjects who lost at least 5% of baseline body weight was 60.0% in the high-dose IQP-AE-103 group, a proportion that is significantly higher than that in the low-dose and the placebo groups. Such weight loss due to the intake of IQP-AE-103 is considered to be of clinical relevance as European Medicines Agency associates a weight loss of 5% or more with a decrease of disease risk factors associated with overweight and obesity [38]. Subgroup analysis showed that although both IQP-AE-103 high- and low-dose consumptions led to significant weight loss in overweight subjects, for moderately obese subjects, only high dose caused a significant body weight reduction. Subgroup analysis also showed a statistically significant weight loss in both high- and low-dose IQP-AE-103 groups in subjects aged 41–65 years when compared with placebo group, whereas only the high-dose group showed a significant weight loss versus placebo in subjects aged 18–40 years.

Direct comparisons of IQP-AE-103 with other weight loss agents that affect dietary fat absorption such as chitosan, Litramine®, or orlistat are difficult for methodological reasons. Ho et al. reported that there were no significant changes from baseline in body weight after 12 weeks of treatment with chitosan [39]. A treatment with Litramine® (a proprietary fibre complex) led to 3.8 kg weight loss after 12 weeks of intake [17]. As for orlistat (gastric and pancreatic lipase inhibitor), a study by Anderson et al. reported a 3.05 kg weight loss in overweight subjects after 16 weeks of treatment at 180 mg per day [40], whereas at higher dose of 360 mg per day, it caused a body weight reduction of 8.3 kg after 12-week period in obese women [41].

In our study, BMI, body fat mass, and waist and hip circumference were also found to be decreased significantly in both IQP-AE-103 dose groups. Lowering waist circumference, a marker of abdominal fat content, indicates that the treatment with IQP-AE-103 could potentially lower the risk of diabetes, coronary heart disease, and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease [42–44]. Additionally, the changes in fat-free mass were not significantly different between the treatment groups, indicating that the weight loss effect was primarily due to body fat reduction.

No significant differences in changes of feeling of fullness and food cravings between the study arms were observed. However, feeling of hunger decreased in 66% of subjects in the high-dose group (statistically significant pre-post change). This may be related to the swelling property of okra pods reported earlier [22]. Okra constituents such as soluble fibre or polysaccharides may increase viscosity of taken meal and form a gel, thus increasing gastric distension and thereby promoting satiety [45].

Another finding of this study is that besides weight loss, IQP-AE-103 showed beneficial effects on lipid metabolism. A significantly higher proportion of subjects in the high-dose IQP-AE-103 group experienced a reduction in triglyceride levels at the end of the study compared with placebo. In subjects with higher baseline total cholesterol levels (>6.2 mmol/L), high dose of IQP-AE-103 was shown to significantly reduce total cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol (pre-post change). Therefore, current outcome suggests that long-term treatment with IQP-AE-103 could be beneficial for subjects with elevated blood lipid levels in reducing the risk of cardiovascular disease.

Our findings stand in line with results obtained by Wang et al., who demonstrated that okra intake decreased serum and hepatic total cholesterol and triglyceride levels, and enhanced fecal excretion of bile acids in mice [46]. In other study, Kahlon et al. showed that okra polysaccharides have strong bile acid binding properties [47]. Furthermore, Chen et al. reported that okra powder showed oil-binding capacities and cholesterol adsorption properties [48]. Additionally, results from animal study by Han et al. imply that inulin may also possess a fat-binding property besides its known beneficial effect as prebiotic, which contributed to a lower triglyceride and cholesterol levels in rats fed with high fat diet in the experiments [49]. Thus, the cholesterol-lowering effect of IQP-AE-103 could possibly be related to the physicochemical properties of both okra and inulin.

IQP-AE-103 demonstrated a very good tolerability profile in our study as expected since okra is typically consumed as food and inulin is widely consumed as fibre/prebiotic supplements. Additionally, okra has shown no toxicity in animals at doses up to 4000 mg/kg [50]. A safety review on inulin by Carabin and Flamm [51] has found no treatment-related toxic effects nor carcinogenicity or genotoxicity. In our study, the overall tolerability towards the IQP-AE-103 in high and low doses was comparable to that in the placebo, according to the rating by the subjects and the investigator. Observed adverse events were unrelated with the IQP-AE-103 consumption. Moreover, there were no significant differences in stool frequency. Therefore, in contrast to many available anti-obesity products that cause unpleasant and sometimes serious side effects, IQP-AE-103 could be considered as a safe, well-tolerated, and effective weight management agent.

Our study has several limitations. One limitation is that it was performed over a short period of only 12 weeks, with no follow-up conducted after the study was finished and no weight maintenance phase after the initial weight loss. As such, the study provides no information about the effects of IQP-AE-103 on long-term weight maintenance and on other obesity-related conditions such as diabetes or cardiovascular disease. In addition, the study included subjects of a wide age range. Although the distribution of different age groups was not substantially different between groups in the current study, it may be helpful to include age as a stratification factor in future study. Changes in gut microbiota composition occur with age [52], and it has been shown that altered gut microbiota may be associated with obesity [53], since IQP-AE-103 contains fibres and polysaccharides from okra pod and inulin, it is likely that the composition of the intestinal gut microbiota may be positively influenced by the consumption of IQP-AE-103. Hence, analysis of gut microbiota changes in overweight and obese subjects of different age groups may provide additional knowledge regarding the effect of IQP-AE-103. Moreover, appetite sensations in the study were assessed using VAS and rating scales, which were not validated for the specific use to measure changes in a similar study design. Last but not least, self-reporting of dietary intake by study subjects, applied for reasons of practicality, may be a limitation. It is known that factors such as gender and weight status affect subjects’ behavior in reporting energy intake; for example, females tended to underreport compared with males, and increasing weight status was associated with an increase in underreporting of energy intake [54]. As such, results obtained in the current study, primarily evaluating weight loss, on IQP-AE-103’s effect on appetite sensations remain exploratory. To evaluate a potential effect of IQP-AE-103 on food/energy intake, quantification of actual calorie intake by recording food consumption at an “ad libitum” lunch may be considered in future studies.

In the next step, the weight loss and weight maintenance efficacy of IQP-AE-103 should be evaluated in longer clinical trials. Also, it would be worthwhile to further investigate any positive effect on cardiovascular risk factors associated with obesity, particularly in subjects with elevated blood lipids. For further elucidation of mode of action, an assessment of fecal fat excretion, or postprandial blood lipid changes and potentially gut microbiome study could be considered.

5. Conclusion and Implication

In summary, the study results provide the first promising evidence that the intake of IQP-AE-103 causes weight loss in overweight and moderately obese subjects in conjunction with a mild hypocaloric diet. The 12-week treatment with IQP-AE-103 also showed very good tolerability. Taken together, IQP-AE-103 can be considered as a safe and effective strategy in fighting obesity with potential benefits in maintaining healthy blood lipids.

Data Availability

The animal and in vitro data used to support the findings of this study are currently under embargo, whereas the research findings are commercialized. Data requests will be considered by the corresponding author 12 months after publication of this article.

Conflicts of Interest

Patricia De Costa is an employee of InQpharm Group Sdn Bhd. Ralf Uebelhack, Udo Bongartz, Gordana Bothe, and Stephanie Seibt are the employees of analyze & realize GmbH. The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

Zaluvida Corporate Sdn Bhd was not involved in the conduct of the clinical study. Natalia Wszelaki and Pee Win Chong assisted in the manuscript write-up and review.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Dr. Norman Bitterlich for his valuable assistance in this study. The clinical study was funded by InQpharm Europe Ltd. and conducted by analyze and realize GmbH.

References

M. Arnold, N. Pandeya, G. Byrnes et al., “Global burden of cancer attributable to high body-mass index in 2012: a population-based study,” The Lancet Oncology, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 36–46, 2015.

H. S. Park, C. Y. Park, S. W. Oh, and H. J. Yoo, “Prevalence of obesity and metabolic syndrome in Korean adults,” Obesity Reviews, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 104–107, 2008.

National Task Force on the Prevention and Treatment of Obesity, “Overweight, obesity, and health risk,” Archives of Internal Medicine, vol. 160, no. 7, pp. 898–904, 2000.

G. S. Hamilton and S. A. Joosten, “Obstructive sleep apnoea and obesity,” Australian Family Physician, vol. 46, no. 7, pp. 460–463, 2017.

F. S. Luppino, L. M. de Wit, P. F. Bouvy et al., “Overweight, obesity, and depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies,” Archives of General Psychiatry, vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 220–229, 2010.

J. Cawley, J. A. Rizzo, and K. Haas, “Occupation-specific absenteeism costs associated with obesity and morbid obesity,” Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, vol. 49, no. 12, pp. 1317–1324, 2007.

D. M. Gates, P. Succop, B. J. Brehm, G. L. Gillespie, and B. D. Sommers, “Obesity and presenteeism: the impact of body mass index on workplace productivity,” Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 39–45, 2008.

J. Cawley and C. Meyerhoefer, “The medical care costs of obesity: an instrumental variables approach,” Journal of Health Economics, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 219–230, 2012.

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, Weight Management: Lifestyle Services for Overweight or Obese Results. Public Health Guideline, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, London, UK, May 2014.

F. Magkos, G. Fraterrigo, J. Yoshino et al., “Effects of moderate and subsequent progressive weight loss on metabolic function and adipose tissue biology in humans with obesity,” Cell Metabolism, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 591–601, 2016.

M. D. Jensen, D. H. Ryan, C. M Apovian et al., “American College of Cardiology/American heart association Task Force on Practice guidelines; obesity society. 2013 AHA/ACC/TOS guideline for the management of overweight and obesity in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American heart association Task Force on Practice guidelines and the obesity society,” Circulation, vol. 129, no. 25, pp. S102–S138, 2014.

G. Blackburn, “Effect of degree of weight loss on health benefits,” Obesity Research, vol. 3, no. S2, pp. 211s–216s, 2012.

J. D. Ard, B. Gower, G Hunter et al., “Effects of calorie restriction in obese older adults: the CROSSROADS randomized controlled trial,” Journals of Gerontology. Series A, Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 73–80, 2017.

L. L. Ioannides-Demos, J. Proietto, A. M. Tonkin, and J. J. McNeil, “Safety of drug therapies used for weight loss and treatment of obesity,” Drug Safety, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 277–302, 2006.

D. Rucker, R. Padwal, S. K. Li, C. Curioni, and D. C. W. Lau, “Long term pharmacotherapy for obesity and overweight: updated meta-analysis,” BMJ, vol. 335, no. 7631, pp. 1194–1199, 2007.

R. Padwal, D. Rucker, S. K. Li, C. Curioni, and D. C. Lau, “Long-term pharmacotherapy for obesity and overweight,” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, no. 4, Article ID CD004094, 2004.

B. Grube, P.-W. Chong, K.-Z. Lau, and H.-D. Orzechowski, “A natural fiber complex reduces body weight in the overweight and obese: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study,” Obesity, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 58–64, 2013.

B. Grube, P. W. Chong, F. Alt, and R. Uebelhack, “Weight maintenance with litramine (IQP-G-002AS): a 24-week double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study,” Journal of Obesity, vol. 2015, Article ID 953138, 6 pages, 2015.

J. K. Udani, P. W. Chong, E. Teng, and J. Gruenwald, “Effect of litramine (IQP-G-002AS) on weight loss in overweight and obese US population: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study,” Journal of Dietetics Research and Nutrition, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 1–5, 2015.

C. Bachmann, “Ein Fasernkomplex zur Gewichtsreduktion und -kontrolle,” Current Therapeutic Research, vol. 76, pp. 25–27, 2010.

R. Uebelhack, R. Busch, F. Alt, Z.-M. Beah, and P.-W. Chong, “Effects of cactus fiber on the excretion of dietary fat in healthy subjects: a double blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover clinical investigation,” Current Therapeutic Research, vol. 76, pp. 39–44, 2014.

L. G. Bakre and K. T. Jaiyeaoba, “Studies on the physicochemical properties of Abelmuscus esculentus L. (Okra) pods: a potential tablet excipient,” International Journal of Biological and Chemical Sciences, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 448–456, 2009.

I. M. Makhadmeh and K. I. Ereifej, “Geometric characteristics and chemical composition of okra (Hibiscus esculentus L.) grown under semi-arid conditions,” International Journal of Food Properties, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 83–90, 2007.

D. S. Kumar, D. E. Tony, A. P. Kumar, K. A. Kumar, D. B. S. Rao, and R. Nadendla, “A review on Abelmoschus esculentus (okra),” International Research Journal of Pharmaceutical and Applied Sciences, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 129–132, 2013.

M. Shoaib, A. Shehzad, M. Omar et al., “Inulin: properties, health benefits and food applications,” Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 147, pp. 444–454, 2016.

A. C. Apolinário, B. P. G. de Lima Damasceno, N. E. de Macêdo Beltrão, A. Pessoa, A. Converti, and J. A. da Silva, “Inulin-type fructans: a review on different aspects of biochemical and pharmaceutical technology,” Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 101, pp. 368–378, 2014.

N. D. Guess, A. Dornhorst, N. Oliver, J. D. Bell, E. L. Thomas, and G. S. Frost, “A randomized controlled trial: the effect of inulin on weight management and ectopic fat in subject with prediabetes,” Nutrition & Metabolism, vol. 12, no. 36, 2015.

T. Mitsuoka, H. Hidaka, and T. Eida, “Effect of fructo-oligosaccharides on intestinal microflora,” Food/Nahrung, vol. 31, no. 5-6, pp. 427–436, 1987.

B. Kleeseen, B. Svkura, H. J. Zunft, and M. Blaut, “Effects of inulin and lactose on faecal microflora, microbial activity, and bowel habit in elderly constipated persons,” American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 65, no. 5, pp. 1397–1402, 1997.

World Health Organization, “Declaration of Helsinki,” Bulletin of the World Health Organization, vol. 86, no. 8, pp. 577–656, 2008.

EMA/CHMP/ICH/135/1995 Guideline for Good Clinical Practice E6(R2), The European Medicines Agency, London, UK, 2016.

Institute of Medicine, Dietary Reference Intakes for Energy, Carbohydrate, Fiber, Fat, Fatty Acids, Cholesterol, Protein, and Amino Acids (Macronutrients), The National Acadamy Press, Washington, DC, USA, 2005.

A. Flint, A. Raben, J. E. Blundell, and A. Astrup, “Reproducibility, power and validity of visual analogue scales in assessment of appetite sensations in single test meal studies,” International Journal of Obesity, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 38–48, 2000.

U. Bongartz, R. Uebelhack, B. Grube, P. W. Chong, and F. Alt, “Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, bicentric clinical investigation to evaluate the benefit and tolerability of Redusure IQP-AK-102 in reducing body weight in overweight and obese subjects,” Advancement in Medicinal Plant Research, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 73–82, 2016.

C. C. Preston and A. M. Colman, “Optimal number of response categories in rating scales: reliability, validity, discriminating power, and respondent preferences,” Acta Psychologica, vol. 104, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2000.

P. Lee, D. Macfarlane, T. Lam, and S. Steward, “Validity of the international physical activity questionnaire short form (IPAQ-SF): a systematic review,” International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, vol. 8, p. 115, 2011.

B. Grube, W. F. Chong, P. W. Chong, and L. Riede, “Weight reduction and maintenance with IQP-PV-101: a 12-week randomized controlled study with a 24-week open label period,” Obesity, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 645–651, 2014.

EMA/CHMP/311805/2014 Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP), Guideline on Clinical Evaluation of Medicinal Products Used in Weight Management, CHMP, London, UK, 2016.

S. C. Ho, E. S. Tai, P. H. Eng, C. E. Tan, and A. C. Fok, “In the absence of dietary surveillance, chitosan does not reduce plasma lipids or obesity in hypercholesterolaemic obese Asian subjects,” Singapore Medical Journal, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 6–10, 2001.

J. W. Anderson, S. M. Schwartz, J Hauptman et al., “Low-dose orlistat effects on body weight of mildly to moderately overweight individuals: a 16 week, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial,” Annals of Pharmacotherapy, vol. 40, no. 10, pp. 1717–1723, 2006.

O. Ozcelik, H. Dogan, and H. Kelestimur, “Effects of a weight-reduction program with orlistat on serum leptin levels in obese women: a 12-week, randomized, placebo-controlled study,” Current Therapeutic Research, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 127–137, 2004.

A. J. Flint, K. M. Rexrode, F. B. Hu et al., “Body mass index, waist circumference, and risk of coronary heart disease: a prospective study among men and women,” Obesity Research & Clinical Practice, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. e171–e181, 2010.

A. P. Clemente, B. D. Netto, J. P de Carvalho-Ferreira et al., “Waist circumference as a marker for screening nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in obese adolescents,” Revista Paulista de Pediatria, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 47–55, 2016.

A. Gautier, R. Roussel, P. H Ducluzeau et al., “Increases in waist circumference and weight as predictors of type 2 diabetes in individuals with impaired fasting glucose: influence of baseline BMI: data from the DESIR study,” Diabetes Care, vol. 33, no. 8, pp. 1850–1852, 2010.

C. L. Hoad, P. Rayment, R. C Spiller et al., “In vivo imaging of intragastric gelation and its effect on satiety in humans,” Journal of Nutrition, vol. 134, no. 9, pp. 2293–2300, 2004.

H. Wang, G. Chen, D. Ren, and S. T. Yang, “Hypolipidemic activity of okra is mediated through inhibition of lipogenesis and upregulation of cholesterol degradation,” Phytotherapy Research, vol. 282, no. 2, pp. 268–273, 2014.

T. S. Kahlon, M. H. Chapman, and G. E. Smith, “In vitro binding of bile acids by okra, beets, asparagus, eggplant, turnips, green beans, carrots and cauliflower,” Food Chemistry, vol. 103, no. 2, pp. 676–680, 2007.

Y. Chen, B. C. Zhang, Y. H. Sun, J. G. Zhang, H. J. Sun, and Z. J. Wei, “Physicochemical properties and adsorption of cholesterol by okra (Abelmoschus esculentus) powder,” Food & Function, vol. 6, no. 12, pp. 3728–3736, 2015.

K. Han, H. Tsuchihira, Y Nakamura et al., “Inulin-type fructans with different degrees of polymerization improve lipid metabolism but not glucose metabolism in rats fed a high-fat diet under energy restriction,” Digestive Diseases and Sciences, vol. 58, no. 8, pp. 2177–2186, 2013.

S. Kumar, “Physicochemical, phytochemical and toxicity studies on gum and mucilage from plant Abelmoschus esculentus,” Journal of Phytopharmacology, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 200–203, 2014.

I. G. Carabin and W. G. Flamm, “Evaluation of safety of inulin and oligofructose as dietary fiber,” Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 268–282, 1999.

M. J. Hopkins, R. Sharp, and G. T. Macfarlane, “Variation in human intestinal microbiota with age,” Digestive and Liver Disease, vol. 34, no. S2, pp. 12–18, 2002.

F. Karlsson, V. Tremaroli, J. Nielsen, and F. Bäckhed, “Assessing the human gut microbiota in metabolic diseases,” Diabetes, vol. 62, no. 10, pp. 3341–3349, 2013.

V. Vance, S. Woodruff, L. McCargar, J. Husted, and R. Hanning, “Self-reported dietary energy intake of normal weight, overweight and obese adolescents,” Public Health Nutrition, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 222–227, 2009.