Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 2019 (2019), Article ID 5743109, 14 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/5743109

Review Article

Cellular Signaling in Müller Glia: Progenitor Cells for Regenerative and Neuroprotective Responses in Pharmacological Models of Retinal Degeneration

Yang Liu, Chenguang Wang, and Guanfang Su

Eye Center, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, 218 Ziqiang Street, Changchun, Jilin 130021, China

Correspondence should be addressed to Guanfang Su; sugf2012@163.com

Received 30 November 2018; Accepted 28 February 2019; Published 19 March 2019

Academic Editor: Biju B. Thomas

Copyright © 2019 Yang Liu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

Retinal degenerative diseases are a leading cause of visual impairment or blindness. There are many therapies for delaying the progression of vision loss but no curative strategies currently. Stimulating intrinsic neuronal regeneration is a potential approach to therapy in retinal degenerative diseases. In contrast to stem cells, as embryonic/pluripotent stem cell-derived retinal progenitor cell or mesenchymal stem cells, Müller glia provided an endogenous cellular source for regenerative therapy in the retina. Müller glia are a major component of the retina and considerable evidence suggested these cells can be induced to produce the lost neurons in several species. Understanding the specific characteristic of Müller glia to generate lost neurons will inspire an attractive and alternative therapeutic strategy for treating visual impairment with regenerative research. This review briefly provides the different signal transduction mechanisms which are underlying Müller cell-mediated neuroprotection and neuron regeneration and discusses recent advances about regeneration from Müller glia-derived progenitors.

1. Introduction

Diseases of retinal degeneration affecting retinal ganglion cells (RGCs), photoreceptors, and the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) are important causes of poor vision and can be caused by disturbances within neural cells or disruption of the functions of supporting cells, such as the RPE. As the disease progresses, permanent visual impairment results from irreversible death or dysfunction of retinal neurons (particularly RGCs and photoreceptors) or RPE cells. There are many types of retinal degenerative diseases, including glaucoma [1], retinitis pigmentosa (RP) [2], age-related macular degeneration (AMD) [3], and diabetic retinopathy (DR) [4]. This heterogeneous group of diseases is associated with various underlying molecular mechanisms and morphological changes, which cause damage to the intact circuit of the retina both in terms of function and structure. The etiology and genetic patterns of these conditions vary; however, the end result is vision loss. Thus, these conditions lead to a significant decline in the quality of life of many people worldwide and have major socioeconomic implications.

Despite extensive studies on retinal degeneration, the mechanisms affecting the development of retinal degeneration remain unclear. In some studies, researchers have used animal models to study disease progression and to facilitate the development of appropriate treatments. Spontaneous and genetic retinal degeneration models exist; however, most models exhibit early postnatal degeneration. Due to the anatomical features of the laboratory animal’s eye (e.g., the size of the eye in mice, opening of the eyes on days 13–15 after birth), surgical procedures and functional assessments of treatment effects are often difficult. In addition, animal models of retinal degeneration based on genetic mutations are expensive and labor-intensive to maintain. Furthermore, we cannot arbitrarily regulate the initiation and severity of the induced damage, which would be not preferable when using animals of different ages for the experiments. Thus, toxins or chemicals have been used in the field of ophthalmology to specifically induce retinopathy in various retinal cell types. The emergence of pharmacologically induced animal models not only allows us to better understand the etiology of retinal degeneration at a molecular level in a controlled manner, but also meets the need for drug-screening tools. Pharmacologically induced models of retinal degeneration have many advantages, including the ability to induce degeneration in animals of different species and/or strains. Therefore, we can adjust the earliest onset and progression of retinal lesions according to the needs of our research. Additionally, the toxins are easier to apply, the most common injection method being single/multiple or local/systemic to induce dosage- and time-dependent injury to select cell types.

Because the mammalian retina, including that in humans, does not have significant regenerative capacity, photoreceptor loss in RP or AMD is still permanent, leading to vision impairment and ultimately blindness. Recent studies have shown that glial cells may have the ability of neural regeneration. Additionally, radial glia can differentiate into neurons and glia during the development of the mammalian central nervous system. There are three main types of glial cells that maintain homeostasis in the retina: microglia, astrocytes, and Müller cells. Müller cells are the main glia of the neural retina and display intimate contact with other neurons and retinal blood vessels as the only cells across the entire layer of the retina. Due to this arrangement, Müller cells play significant roles in supporting neuronal function in the healthy retina. When the retina is damaged, Müller cells can dedifferentiate and proliferate, generated neuronal progenitor cells, migrate to the injured retinal regions, and differentiate into lost neuronal types. Thus, it is important to elucidate whether endogenous progenitors can proliferate and differentiate in response to injuries and eventually repair the damaged retina. Although a variety of treatments are currently being investigated, there is no effective cure to date. The mechanism responsible for the limited survival and proliferation of mammalian Müller glia is still unknown. Therefore, examination of these signaling pathways and how their activation relates to retinal regeneration in fish, birds, and mammals is important to elucidate the mechanisms contributing to differential injury. Moreover, a proper understanding of the signaling mechanisms alterations involved in reactive of Müller cells is critical for developing effective treatments for pharmacological models of retinal degeneration, including glaucoma, RP, AMD, and DR.

In this review, we summarize of the neuroregenerative and neuroprotective effects of Müller glial progenitor cells (MGPCs), with discussion of the cellular signal transduction pathway underlying in Müller cell-mediated neuroprotection and regeneration of neural progenitor cells. Exploring the cellular events and molecular mechanisms involved in Müller cell activities in different species endowed with regenerative capacities could provide knowledge to unlock the restricted potential of their mammalian counterparts. In this context, the bulk of review provides an overview of Müller cell responses to degenerative injuries across nonmammal and mammal model systems and summarizes recent advancement in the field of regenerative medicine.

2. Regenerative and Neuroprotective Mechanisms in Glaucoma Induced by Methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA)

2.1. Glaucoma and NMDA

Glutamate is an important neurotransmitter in the central nervous system and functions to mediate excitatory synaptic transmission. Excessive glutamate between synapses results in neuronal damage or death, referred to as the excitotoxicity of glutamate, which is considered an important cause of pathological changes in many neurological diseases. Among the ionotropic glutamate receptors, the NMDA receptor (NMDAR) is a major contributor to excitotoxicity [5, 6]. NMDARs exist in a variety of subtype structures and have distinct functions [7–9]. Because of the diversity of the molecular (subunit) compositions of NMDARs, their biophysical and pharmacological properties, subcellular localization, and interaction partners are also diverse. NMDAR dysfunctions are involved in various neurological and psychiatric disorders, including Parkinsons’s disease [10, 11], Alzheimer’s disease [12–14], major depression [15, 16], traumatic brain injury [17–19], and pathological pain [20, 21]. In the brain, recent identification of NMDAR as a significant factor contributes to the process of pathophysiology in neuronal and vascular cells. Multiple receptors and channels enriching astrocyte endfeet confer on astrocytes the ability to link neuronal activity to regional cerebral blood flow. The complex interactions among multiple cell types including neuronal and vascular cells and astrocytes are important for sustaining adequate cerebral blood flow that is necessary for normal brain function and survival [22]. In injured brain, neural activity induced reduction in astrocyte endfoot Ca²⁺ and this phenomenon was accompanied by an increase arteriole tone [23].

The phenomenon of glutamate excitotoxicity was first described in the retina [24] (Table 1). Glutamate is involved in the transmission of neurosynaptic information during retinal photoreceptor processes, such as transmission between photoreceptors and bipolar cells and between bipolar cells and ganglion cells. Excitotoxicity is a pathophysiological mechanism that causes various neurological diseases, including ophthalmic diseases affecting the retina and optic nerve [74–81]. One of example such pathophysiology is glaucoma, in which RGCs undergo apoptosis due to excessive accumulation of glutamate in the glaucomatous vitreous [82]. The limitation of NMDA administration refered that there are different susceptibilities to NMDA toxicity among different types of RGCs [83]. Therefore, the present model of NMDA is not enough for exploring the mechanism of all glaucoma types. Moreover, further experiments are needed to show whether there are other retinal responses except NMDA decreased cholinergic activity of retinal amacrine cells [84, 85].

Table 1: Overview of pharmacological models for retinal degeneration.

Substance
Disease
Affected cell types
Cell death
Animal mode

NMDA
Glaucoma
RGC
Apoptosis
Chick [25, 26], carp [27, 28], mudpuppy [29, 30], avian [31], turtle [32, 33], mouse, rat [34, 35], rabbit [36, 37], cat [38], bovine [39], and zebrafish [40, 41]

MNU
Retinitis pigmentosa
Photoreceptor
Apoptosis
Apoptosis/necrosis
Mouse [42–44], rat [45–47], hamsters [48], rabbit [49], pig [50], cat [51], shrew [52], and monkey [53]

NAIO₃
AMD
RPE (primary)
photoreceptor (secondary)
Apoptosis
Mice [42, 54], rat [55, 56], cat [57], rabbit [58, 59], sheep [60], pig [61], and monkey [62]

STZ
DR
Perithelial cell
Necrosis
Mice [63, 64], rat [65, 66], zebrafish [67, 68], rabbit [69], dog [70], monkey [71], and pig [72, 73]

2.2. Molecular Consequences of Cell Death Induced by NMDA

Based on the present study, the degeneration of NMDA-mediated excitotoxicity of RGCs was accompanied by Ca²⁺ overload, which led to neurotoxic signaling cascades active, such as the formation of nitric oxide (NO) and activation of Ca²⁺-activated proteolytic enzymes and DNA [86]. Chiu observed that μ-calpain upregulation occurs prior to major apoptotic changes, suggesting a significant role in retina cell death. Moreover, inhibition of μ-calpain protects retinal neurons against NMDA-induced excitotoxicity [87]. NMDA also causes apoptosis-specific activation of caspase-3. Excessive extracellular glutamate in glaucoma stimulates NMDARs, which are involved in retinal neuronal cell death via induction of fragmentation in internucleosomal retinal neuron DNA [88].

2.3. Mechanisms of Progenitor Cell Generation from Müller Glia

2.3.1. Müller Glia in Avian and Chicken

The diversity of signaling pathways retinal degeneration communicating with Müller glia in the NMDA-mediated retina damaged (Figure 1 and Table 2) suggests that injuries activate multiple signaling transduction cascades. Studies of retinal regeneration in the injured retina have also focused on Müller glial cells. Exploration of the specific mechanisms contributing to retinal regeneration will facilitate the development of strategies to enhance endogenous repair capacity in different model systems.

Figure 1: Signaling pathways regulating Müller glia cell dedifferentiation and proliferation following retinal injury induced by NMDA: pro, proliferation; dedi, dedifferentiation; neuro, neuroprotective.

Table 2: Signaling cascades contributing to MGPC formation in pharmacological models.

Substance
Signal pathway
Müller glia state
Animal tested
MGPC function

NMDA
Jak/Stat
Upregulation
Pro and dedi
Chicken
Regenerative [89]

Upregulation
Pro and dedi
Mouse
Regenerative [90]

mTor
Upregulation
Pro and dedi
Chicken
Regenerative [91]

Downregulation
—
Rat
Neuroprotective [92, 93]

Upregulation
Pro and dedi
Mouse
Regenerative [90]

ERK
Upregulation
Dedifferentiation
Chicken
Regenerative [94]

Activate
—
Rat
Neuroprotective [92, 95]

Upregulation
Pro and dedi
Mouse
Regenerative [90]

Wnt-catenin
Upregulation
Pro and dedi
Chicken
Regenerative [96]

Upregulation
Pro and dedi
Rat
Regenerative [97]

Notch
Upregulation
Pro and dedi
Avian
Regenerative [98]

Upregulation
Pro and dedi
Chinken
Regenerative [99]

Upregulation
Pro and dedi
Rat
Regenerative [97]

Downregulation
Pro
Fish
Regenerative [100]

Glutamate
Activate
Pro and dedi
Rat
Regenerative [101, 102]

Retinoic acid
Upregulation
Pro and dedi
Avian
Regenerative [103]

BMP4/7
Upregulation
Proliferation
Chicken
Neuroprotective [104]

BMP4/Smad1/5/8
Upregulation
Dedifferentiation
Chicken
Regenerative [105]

TGFβ/P-smad2/3
Downregulation
Dedifferentiation
Chicken
Regenerative [105]

MNU
TGFβ/P-smad3
Downregulation
Proliferation
Zerafish
Regenerative [106]

P53/P21-cyclin1
Upregulation
Dedifferentiation
Rat
Regenerative [107, 108]

SHH
Activate
Pro and dedi
Rat
Regenerative [109]

NAIO₃
Notch
Downregulation
Dedifferentiation
Rat
Regenerative [110]

NTs
Overproduce
Proliferation
Mouse
Neuroprotective [111]

STZ
VEGFR2-AKT
VEGFR2-AKT
(knockout-activate)
Apoptosis
Mice
Apoptosis [112]

P-ERK1/2
Activate
Activate
Rat
Neuroprotective [113]

Pro: proliferation; dedi: dedifferentiation.

A large network of cell-signaling molecules is activated to regulate the reprogramming of Müller glia into stem cells in the retinas of fish and chicks. Fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF2)/mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling plays a key role in Müller glia-stem cell formation in the chicken and avian retinas and has been shown to interact with Janus kinase (JAK)/signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT), extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK), Notch, Wnt, retinoic acid (RA), and bone morphogenic protein (BMP)/Smad signaling pathways. JAK/STAT3 signaling plays critical roles in the network of pathways that drives the reprogramming of mature Müller glia into proliferating, where activation of JAK/STAT3 is sufficient to stimulate neural regeneration from Müller glia-stem cells [89]. The MAPK pathway plays neuroprotective roles against excitotoxic damage and stimulates Müller glia proliferation further to acquire neuroprotective capacity and the progenitor phenotype [114]. Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling is transiently upregulated in Müller glia following NMDA-induced retinal damage; activation of mTOR is necessary but insufficient to stimulate the reentry of Müller glia into the cell cycle and formation of MGPCs [91]. Crosstalk between mTOR and FGF/MAPK or other signaling pathways may explain the correlation between mTOR and the number of proliferating MGPCs. ERK signaling is activated and modulates the dedifferentiation of Müller cells, expression of retinal progenitor cell genes, as demonstrated by in vivo and ex vivo analyses [94]. Canonical Wnt signaling not only compensates for inhibition of MAPK kinase to facilitate the formation of proliferating MGPCs, activated downstream of MAPK signaling in damaged retinas, but is also required for the dedifferentiation and proliferation of Müller cells [96]. The upregulation of Notch signals may directly control glial injury responses to modulate the fate of Müller glia (e.g., differentiate or proliferate) [98]. Notch signaling has been shown to activate the proliferation of Müller glia, mediated by upstream FGF2/MAPK signaling, and inhibition of Notch signaling in Müller glia suppresses neuroprotection in ganglion cells [99]. Additionally, activation of RA signaling following NMDA injection enhances the proliferative and neurogenic capacities of MGPCs in the avian retina [103]. Crosstalk between FGF/MAPK and RA signaling has recently been reported during neural regeneration, where these signaling pathways drive the proliferation and differentiation of progenitor cells [103]. Additional studies are required to elucidate the specific mechanisms through which MAPK signaling interacts with RA signaling during the formation of MGPCs. Retinal regeneration processes are promoted not only by the activation of signaling cascades that stimulate MGPCs formation but also by inhibition of pathways that drive Müller glia proliferation and differentiation. BMP4 and BMP7 prevent the proliferation of progenitor-like cells derived from Müller glia cells within damaged retina when these factors are applied before NMDA intraocular injections [104]. In contrast to earlier reports, recent studies have shown that inhibition of BMP signaling suppresses the proliferation of Müller glia-derived stem cells in NMDA-damaged retinas, whereas inhibition of transforming growth factorβ (TGF-β)/Smad2 signaling promotes the proliferation of Müller cells [105].

2.3.2. Müller Glia in Mice/Rats

In vertebrate retinas, Müller glial cells are quiescent supportive cells for neurons. However, recent studies have shown that Müller cells have neural regeneration potential in response to NMDA [115, 116]. Müller cells can respond to excessive NMDA administration indirectly through a various extracellular molecules released from NMDA-damaged neurons. In addition, Müller cells can also express NMDARs directly in response to NMDA-induced damage. Therefore, the proliferative response of Müller cells may be caused by multiple pathways following NMDA treatment.

Karl and colleagues showed, for the first time, that the mammalian retina has the capacity to regenerate neurons, as recognized by the proliferation and dedifferentiation of Müller glia; a subpopulation of these cells subsequently transdifferentiated into amacrine cells [117]. Although the interactions between mTOR and ERK signaling remain unclear, inhibition of mTOR can reduce apoptotic cell death resulting from NMDA and is involved in the endogenous neuroprotective system via activation of the ERK pathway in Müller cells [92, 93, 95]. Moreover, Fischer and colleagues also showed that mTOR and ERK signaling were involved in multiple networks of signaling pathways contributing to MGPCs formation in the mouse retina [90]. The activities of Notch and Wnt pathways are enhanced in neurotoxin-treated retinas, exhibiting extensive crosstalk to modulate the stem cell properties of Müller cells through upregulation of cyclin A and cyclin D1 transcripts. These pathways regulate the maintenance of stem cells in Müller cells. Additionally, the stem cell features of Müller cells are sensitive to perturbation of these pathways [97]. Another study showed that glutamate induces postnatal MGPCs proliferation and CREB phosphorylation both in vitro and in vivo; these molecular mechanisms may be involved in progenitor self-renewal [101]. In addition, glutamate induces dedifferentiation signals in primary cultures of Müller glial cells from postnatal rats, suggesting that NMDAR activation and global DNA demethylation are retained during these processes [102]. Recent reports have shown that Apobec1 likely participates but may not be sufficient to initiate DNA methylation and demethylation, which regulate Müller cell dedifferentiation and Nestin expression [118]. Kaori showed that p53 is rapidly upregulated and histones are phosphorylated in Müller cells in neurotoxin-treated retinas, but not in zebrafish Müller glia [107].

The TGF-β pathway is thought to play an important role in neuronal and endothelial cell damage induced by NMDA. The neuroprotective effects of TGF-β inhibitors on the injured retina have been demonstrated; that is, disruption of the TGF-β signaling pathway successfully prevents RGC loss and subsequent capillary degeneration in NMDA-treated retinas [119]. Subsequent research has shown that this neuroprotection is independent of Müller glia. In the Müller glia of the mammalian retina, TGF-β signaling may not be an essential factor inducing Müller glia cell proliferation and subsequent transdifferentiation into retinal neurons. Additionally, inhibition of the TGF-β pathway does not induce Müller cell-dependent protection of retinal neurons from excitotoxic damage [120].

In both nonmammals and mammals, these pathways exhibit extensive crosstalk and converge through the MAPK/ERK, mTOR, and JAK/STAT signaling cascades to affect Stat3 and Ascl1 gene regulation and convert Müller glia through proliferation, dedifferentiation, and trandifferentiation [121, 122]. More particularly, several studies have highlighted the significance in overexpression of Ascl1 in reprograming Müller glia into neurogenic retinal progenitors. Overload of Ascl1 in dissociated mouse Müller glia cultures and intact retinal explants confer on Müller glia differentiate into cells that resemble neurons in morphology and gene expression and their responses to neurotransmitters [123]. Ascl1 can promote either neural differentiation or proliferation of Müller glia respond to injury induced by NMDA were tested in vivo [100, 124]. Ascl1 combined with other factor enhance survival of proliferating MG and allow reprogramming to multipotency to participate in neuron regeneration.

3. Regenerative Mechanisms in Retinitis Pigmentosa (RP) Induced by N-Methyl-N-nitrosourea (MNU)

3.1. RP and MNU

RP is a group of photoreceptor cells dystrophy characterized by the progressive cause of vision loss from adolescence to later adulthood worldwide [125]. Although causative genetics are tightly implicated with the apoptosis of rod photoreceptors, the reason for most retinal degenerations is still unidentified. Clinical manifestations of RP commonly include in night blindness, constriction of visual fields, and eventually vision loss, particularly in patients who develop RP in adolescence or infancy. Therefore, visual acuity impairment occurs in the early period of RP, leading to significantly higher medical costs and disability-adjusted life for these patients [126]. The cell-disrupting agent of MNU-induced photoreceptor apoptosis and retinal degeneration is a valuable and reliable method to investigate injury mechanisms and neuroprotective function on RP owing to similarities in the mechanisms of cell death with human RP.

3.2. Molecular Consequences of Cell Death Induced by MNU

MNU is a tumorigenic agent that directly interacts with the DNA by causing guanine methylation [127]. In ophthalmic research, the MNU model induces the formation of cataracts via generation of DNA adducts in the lens epithelial cell nuclei. This process results in cell apoptosis and cataract formation through downregulation of Bcl-2, upregulation of Bax, and activation of caspase-3 [128]. Attention should be paid to the occurrence of complications while applying MNU. In the retina, MNU selectively damages photoreceptor cells, and no other cells are damaged. Based on the signaling pathway of MNU-induced photoreceptor cell apoptosis, significant increases in the activation of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase, calpain, and caspase are involved in the release of apoptosis-inducing factor and cause neuronal cell death [129–134].

3.3. Mechanisms of Progenitor Cell Generation from Müller Glia

The traditional concept of Müller glial cells as passive support cells for the retina has been challenged by the new discoveries in which zebrafish Müller glial cells display neurogenic features. Photoreceptor degeneration is an important trigger for the activation of Müller glia, even if only a few rod cells death. Thus, when retinal damage occurs, Müller cells in the inner layer are activated and have the capacity to differentiate into rod photoreceptors [40].

TGF-β is an important ligand affecting cellular behaviors, modulating cell migration, proliferation, and death during development and tissue repair [135]. After activation TGF-β ligands, Smad2/3 are translocated to the nucleus, resulting in activation of transcription factors associated with the regulation of cell cycle proteins and the production of growth factors. The TGF-β pathway has been shown to play a crucial role in fin regeneration in adult zebrafish [136]. Moreover, regenerating photoreceptors are produced by proliferating Müller glia in zebrafish model received MNU injection, in which extensive photoreceptor cell death was examined within 1 week after MNU application [41]. In recent studies, visual acuity measurements have shown decreasing visual function until day 3, followed by complete restoration of visual acuity on day 30. This is consistent with the histological degenerative and regenerative changes observed after MNU administration, with maximum apoptosis occurring on day 3 [137]. Notably, significant advancement has been achieved in elucidating the cell signal transmission mechanism that promotes the transition of Müller glia into MGPCs. In the retina, TGF-β signaling has been implicated in driving the generation of MGPCs in an MNU-induced chemical model of rod photoreceptor degeneration and regeneration in adult zebrafish. Furthermore, inhibition of the TGF-β signaling pathway results in accelerated recovery from retinal degeneration [106].

Extracellular signaling pathways control the proliferation of mammalian cells primarily in the G₁ stage of the cell cycle. During this stage, growth of stimulatory or inhibitory signals transition from the extracellular environment influence the cell cycle clock in the nucleus. The cell cycle clock includes cyclins and associated cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs), through which the cells can be selectively introduced into the autonomic cell division program or exit from the cell cycle into a quiescent G₀ phase. Once the specific cyclins and CDKs complexes are formed and activated in G₁, cell cycle progression is triggered by phosphorylation of key cellular substrate proteins. In the normal mature retina, cyclin D1 and cyclin D3 are expressed in Müller cells [138, 139]. Notably, in the adult rat retina following MNU administration, photoreceptor apoptosis can drive Müller glia to transdifferentiate into neurons expressing rhodopsin and integrate into retinal circuits accompanied by upregulation of cyclin D1 and cyclin D3 proteins [108]. Accordingly, Müller cell reentry into the cell cycle is triggered from the quiescent G₀ state; the cells then progress to the G₁/S checkpoint and undergo proliferation through cyclin D1-and cyclin D3-related signaling mechanisms. Furthermore, Kaori suggested that accumulation of the histone variantγ-H2AX as well as p53 and p21, which are key regulators inducing cell cycle arrest, modulates cell cycle proteins, including cyclin D1 and cyclin D3, to mediate the proliferative and regenerative potential of Müller glia in the mammalian retina [107]. In addition, activation of the sonic hedgehog pathway by specific agonists efficiently enhances the endogenous neurogenic capacity of retinal Müller cells and promotes the transdifferentiation of Müller glial cells to photoreceptors both in primary cultures of Müller glial cells and in rat retinal cells [109].

4. Regenerative and Neuroprotective Mechanisms in AMD Induced by Sodium Iodate (NAIO₃)

4.1. AMD and NAIO₃

AMD is a disease causing irreversible blindness among individuals over 65 years of age [140]. Clinical studies have shown that AMD results from a confluence of stressors, such as age, genetic susceptibility, and oxidative stress; these stressors act on the outer retina (RPE and photoreceptors) and disrupt normal cellular homeostasis [141–143]. In epidemiologic studies, age is the most important risk factor for AMD. Cigarette smoking, a strongly modifiable risk factor that induces systemic oxidative stress, has been established as a significant risk factor for AMD [144–146].

NaIO₃ models are commonly used to mimic retinal degeneration by inducing a disease-associated increase in oxidative stress and consistent and selective damage to the RPE [147]. However, in the past few decades, this model has failed to show repeatability with regard to the generation of significantly different lesions in the predetermined and anticipated areas and clear boundaries between the relatively the healthy and atrophic retina, as observed in patients with AMD with circumscribed atrophy. Recently, significant progress has been made to establish a model that replicates all of the characteristics of AMD observed in humans. Mones and colleagues developed a swine model of controlled areas of geographic atrophy with damage selectively restricted in outer layers and with a healthy retina field remaining in the vicinity as features of AMD observed in humans [148]. The residual or remaining healthy host tissues may be convenient for application in regenerative medicine, and this model was found to be closer to the human disease.

4.2. Retinal Damage Induced by NaIO₃

When NaIO₃ is used intravenously in mice, the extent of RPE damage is dependent on the concentration of NaIO₃ and the time elapsed after injection [149]. Furthermore, different injection protocols for NaIO₃ (e.g., intraperitoneal, intravenous, or retro-orbital injection) may also account for significant discrepancies in results between different reports. NaIO₃ selectively damages the retina, and this damage is observed as apoptosis or necroptosis in the RPE in the central retina followed by preferential apoptosis of cones photoreceptors adjacent to the region [150, 151]. Exposure to NaIO₃ results in patchy loss of the RPE followed by subsequent degeneration of photoreceptors, similar to the features of advanced atrophic AMD [152].

4.3. Mechanisms of Progenitor Cell Generation from Müller Glia

Zebrafish provide an essential model system for regenerative medicine research and the prediction of compound toxicity. NaIO₃-induced retinal damage has been studied in many species, including mice [42, 54], rats [55, 56], cat [57], rabbits [58, 59], sheep [60], pig [61], and monkeys [62]. However, no histopathological changes have been observed in the retinas of larval and juvenile, and visual dysfunction appears absent in adult zebrafish, regardless of the dose or time of NaIO₃ exposure [153]. Therefore, zebrafish exhibit different reactivity patterns from mammals in response to the retinal toxicant NaIO₃.

NaIO₃-based models of retinal degeneration were reported as early as 1953 by Noell [154]. Since then, NaIO₃-induced retinal damage has been widely used in mammals. Mammalian retinal glial cells have limited capacity for transient proliferation and generation of neural stem cells after NaIO₃ exposure. Notch signaling is a critical component of Müller glia specification during development, and its activation may be vital for driving Müller glia to reenter the cell cycle and regenerate neurons in adults [155]. The regulatory effects of Notch on reentry of the cell cycle may be mediated, at least in part, by its effector p27Kip1, a cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor [156]. Müller cells in mature retinas are thought to activate and reenter the cell cycle to proliferate in response to nerve growth factor signaling and downregulation of p27Kip1. Additionally, downregulation of the Notch pathway enhances the differentiation of MGPCs into retinal neurons expressing photoreceptor markers after NaIO₃ injection in rats [110].

Recent studies have shown that Müller cells are essential for neural retina regeneration and exhibit neuroprotective properties, thereby enhancing neuronal survival. Injection of moderate concentrations of NaIO₃ intravenously appears to be important to promote RPE cell proliferation and regeneration in rodents [149, 157]. Moreover, Müller cells produce neurotrophic growth factors and relevant receptors, which play crucial roles in promoting endogenous regeneration of the damaged RPE following administration of low-dose NaIO₃¹¹⁸. Müller glial cells proliferate, migrate from their primary location toward the damaged site, and stimulate removal of cell debris by phagocyte, including both Müller glia and macrophages, and the remainder healthy retinal cells enter into regenerate. Furthermore, their study implied that some Müller cells express the transcription factor of RPE in the nucleus to promote migration of Müller glia toward the injured RPE.

5. Neuroprotective Mechanisms in DR Induced by Streptozotocin (STZ)

5.1. DR and STZ

DR is an important cause of blindness in working-age individuals in developed countries and has traditionally been considered to represent a dysfunction of the blood-retinal barrier (BRB). However, the cellular and molecular mechanisms of retinal neuronal alterations and survival signaling in DR remain unclear.

There are three main types of mouse models for studying DR; the first two models use pharmacological induction of DR or diabetic mice carrying endogenous mutations [158–160], whereas the third type primarily targets pathological angiogenesis induced in transgenic animals or by experimental procedures in mice without diabetes [161]. Type 1 diabetes can be developed in mice by administration of chemicals; for example, STZ can destroy beta cells in islets. Accordingly, STZ treatment has been routinely used to induce DR in model rodents for various mechanistic studies and therapeutic drug tests.

5.2. Pathogenesis of DR Induced by STZ

The STZ-induced diabetic rats displays retinal changes similar to those observed in the early stages of human DR. Cellular and molecular changes in STZ-induced DR are involved in breakdown of the BRB [162], decreases in pericytes and endothelial cells [163], and thickening of the basement membrane [70]. Oxidative stress is a key regulator of diabetic complications [164, 165]. Retinal neuronal cells are influenced by reactive oxygen species (ROS) via various mechanisms. The overproduction of local ROS and subsequent activation of ERK in the diabetic retina have been observed as modulators of synaptophysin protein expression and the electroretinogram amplitude [164]. Moreover, oxidative stress downregulates brain-derived neurotrophic factor, which regulates synaptic activity, neuronal apoptosis, and visual function [166, 167].

Crosstalk between angiotensin II and ROS signals has also been shown to have major roles in the pathogenesis of DR [168, 169]. In the context of diabetes-induced degeneration of neural tissues, ROS generated downstream of angiotensin II receptor also upregulates multiple inflammatory cytokines, including interferon-γ, interleukin-1β, and tumor necrosis factor-α, which further produce ROS production [169].

5.3. Mechanisms of Progenitor Cell Generation from Müller Glia

Recent studies have demonstrated a strong association between Müller glia and DR. Indeed, in DR, Müller cells exhibit a specific and complex reactive phenotype characterized by the induction of proinflammation related factors and acute-phase responses proteins; thus, Müller cells have been identified as major contributors to DR [170]. Müller glia are believed to be a source of various neurotrophic factors, which have positive effects on retinal homeostasis and neuron survival. In DR, Müller cells, which are characterized by their unique physiological arrangement across the whole retina, play active roles in regulating BRB function, promoting chronic inflammation, and modulating neovascularization.

Müller glia are a major cellular source of regulating survival signals for retinal neurons under diabetic conditions [171–174]. Although vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) produced by Müller cell contributes to BRB breakdown, neovascularization, and other pathological changes in DR [175], the primary role of this factor in diabetic retinas is to protect retinal neurons from diabetic insults. Disrupting Müller glia cell-derived VEGF using conditional VEGF-knockout mice significantly alleviated retinal vessel leakage and inflammation lesions in DR [172]. Therefore, Müller glia cell-derived VEGF is an essential pathogenic factor for retinal vascular leakage and inflammation action in DR. However, recent studies have also shown that disruption of VEGF receptor-2 (VEGFR2) in Müller glia accelerates the impairment of retina function and causes gradual loss of ganglion cells, photoreceptors, and inner nuclear layer neurons under diabetic conditions, probably by directly or indirectly suppressing trophic factor release [112]. Thus, the VEGFR2-mediated pathway in Müller glia in DR may provide neuroprotection through modulation of the release of neurotrophic factors or through other essential glial functions under diabetic conditions.

The ERK1/2 signaling pathway is required for Müller cells in early stage diabetes and primary Müller cells in vitro under the condition of high-glucose stimulation [176]. Müller glial activation is associated with neuroprotective activity when the retina is exposed to high-glucose-induced neurotoxicity in vivo and in vitro, and phosphorylated ERK1/2 in Müller cells has been shown to activate prosurvival pathways in retinal neurons [113]. Müller cells also exert neuroprotective effects in damaged RGCs through the interaction between the sonic hedgehog and ERK1/2 pathways in a rat diabetes model [177].

6. Conclusions and Future Perspectives

In this review, we described how chemical-induced retinal degeneration triggers a sequence of signaling pathway events in Müller glia to support the self-regeneration and neuroprotection of injured retinal tissue. Endogenous approaches using Müller glial-stem cells for repair have various advantages and avoid many of the problems associated with cell transplantation and prosthetic devices. In particular, endogenous regeneration does not require cell infiltration and does not stimulate an immune reaction. Although Müller glial cell-dependent regeneration stimulated by MNU, NAIO₃, and STZ is limited in mammals compared with NMDA-induced degeneration in chicken retinas, as summarized above, discovering the molecular mechanisms and cellular events underlying Müller cell behavior in species with different regenerative and neuroprotective capacities is an active field of investigation.

Based on the information presented in this review, we concluded that the same pathway cascades have different effects on Müller cells in different species, e.g., neuroregeneration or neuroprotection. Moreover, differences in the upregulation or downregulation of pathways that induce or execute regeneration or protection in Müller cells have been observed in various injury paradigms. The crosstalk between different pathways is complex (e.g., mTOR/ERK or Notch/Wnt signaling converge in the same model), suggesting that activation of these pathways plays an important role in retina regeneration.

Despite these extensive studies, several aspects of retina regeneration are still unclear. Accordingly, additional studies are needed to evaluate intrinsic differences, extrinsic inhibitors, epigenetic constraints, immune mechanisms, and other factors affecting Müller cell-dependent regeneration in mammals. Moreover, future research should examine why MGPCs exit the cell cycle when new neurons are generated to accurately replace those that are lost in the injured retina. The pathways exhibiting neuroregeneration or neuroprotection in response to injury in different models should also be evaluated, and the mechanisms through which these signals cooperate with others to affect Müller glia reprogramming and MGPC formation are not fully understood. Addressing these gaps in knowledge should contribute to the progress of approaches for stimulating retinal regeneration by MGPCs and for the therapy of retina-related diseases.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the project “Therapeutic effect of stem cells on retina degenerative diseases” (grant number 3D516D663429).

References

F. A. Medeiros, R. Lisboa, R. N. Weinreb, J. M. Liebmann, C. Girkin, and L. M. Zangwill, “Retinal ganglion cell count estimates associated with early development of visual field defects in glaucoma,” Ophthalmology, vol. 120, no. 4, pp. 736–744, 2013.

A. V. Cideciyan, R. Sudharsan, V. L. Dufour et al., “Mutation-independent rhodopsin gene therapy by knockdown and replacement with a single AAV vector,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 115, no. 36, pp. E8547–E8556, 2018.

J. B. Jonas, “Global prevalence of age-related macular degeneration,” The Lancet Global Health, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. e65–e66, 2014.

H. Liu, J. Tang, Y. Du et al., “Photoreceptor cells influence retinal vascular degeneration in mouse models of retinal degeneration and diabetes,” Investigative Opthalmology and Visual Science, vol. 57, no. 10, pp. 4272–4281, 2016.

J. S. Hahn, E. Aizenman, and S. A. Lipton, “Central mammalian neurons normally resistant to glutamate toxicity are made sensitive by elevated extracellular Ca2+: toxicity is blocked by the N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist MK-801,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 85, no. 17, pp. 6556–6560, 1988.

N. Sucher, E. Aizenman, and S. Lipton, “N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonists prevent kainate neurotoxicity in rat retinal ganglion cells in vitro,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 966–971, 1991.

12-4-Role of distinct NMDA receptor subtypes at central synapses.pdf.

S. F. Traynelis, L. P. Wollmuth, C. J. McBain et al., “Glutamate receptor ion channels: structure, regulation, and function,” Pharmacological Reviews, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 405–496, 2010.

P. Paoletti, “Molecular basis of NMDA receptor functional diversity,” European Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 33, no. 8, pp. 1351–1365, 2011.

D. Aarsland, C. Ballard, Z. Walker et al., “Memantine in patients with Parkinson’s disease dementia or dementia with Lewy bodies: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial,” The Lancet Neurology, vol. 8, no. 7, pp. 613–618, 2009.

P. Hallett and D. G. Standaert, “Rationale for and use of NMDA receptor antagonists in Parkinson’s disease,” Pharmacology and Therapeutics, vol. 102, no. 2, pp. 155–174, 2004.

B. Reisberg, R. Doody, A. Stöffler et al., “Memantine in moderate-to-severe Alzheimer’s disease,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 348, no. 14, pp. 1333–1341, 2003.

P. N. Tariot, “Contemporary issues in the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease: tangible benefits of current therapies,” Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 15–22, 2006.

B. Winblad, R. W. Jones, Y. Wirth, A. Stöffler, and H. J. Möbius, “Memantine in moderate to severe Alzheimer’s disease: a meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials,” Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 20–27, 2007.

I. A. Paul and P. Skolnick, “Glutamate and depression,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 1003, no. 1, pp. 250–272, 2003.

P. Skolnick, P. Popik, and R. Trullas, “Glutamate-based antidepressants: 20 years on,” Trends in Pharmacological Sciences, vol. 30, no. 11, pp. 563–569, 2009.

G. Hocking and M. J. Cousins, “Ketamine in chronic pain management: an evidence-based review,” Anesthesia and Analgesia, vol. 97, no. 6, pp. 1730–1739, 2003.

E. Visser and S. A. Schug, “The role of ketamine in pain management,” Biomedicine and Pharmacotherapy, vol. 60, no. 7, pp. 341–348, 2006.

R. F. Bell, “Ketamine for chronic non-cancer pain,” Pain, vol. 141, no. 3, pp. 210–214, 2009.

C. J. Woolf and M. W. Salter, “Neuronal plasticity: increasing the gain in pain,” Science, vol. 288, no. 5472, pp. 1765–1768, 2000.

C. J. Woolf and S. W. N. Thompson, “The induction and maintenance of central sensitization is dependent on N-methyl-D-aspartic acid receptor activation; implications for the treatment of post-injury pain hypersensitivity states,” Pain, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 293–299, 1991.

G. C. Petzold and V. N. Murthy, “Role of astrocytes in neurovascular coupling,” Neuron, vol. 71, no. 5, pp. 782–797, 2011.

E. M. F. Mehina, C. Murphy-Royal, and G. R. Gordon, “Steady-state free Ca2+ in astrocytes is decreased by experience and impacts arteriole tone,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 37, no. 34, pp. 8150–8165, 2017.

D. R. Lucas and J. P. Newhouse, “The toxic effect of sodium L-glutamate on the inner layers of the retina,” Archives of Ophthalmology, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 193–201, 1957.

B. L. Gibson and L. Reif-Lehrer, “Mg2+ reduces N-methyl-D-aspartate neurotoxicity in embryonic chick neural retina in vitro,” Neuroscience Letters, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 13–18, 1985.

J. Sattayasai and D. Ehrlioh, “Folic acid protects chick retinal neurons against the neurotoxic action of excitatory amino acids,” Experimental Eye Research, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 523–535, 1987.

M. Ariel, S. C. Mangel, and J. E. Dowling, “N-methyld-aspartate acts as an antagonist of the photoreceptor transmitter in the carp retina,” Brain Research, vol. 372, no. 1, pp. 143–148, 1986.

M. Ariel, E. M. Lasater, S. C. Mangel, and J. E. Dowling, “On the sensitivity of H1 horizontal cells of the carp retina to glutamate, aspartate and their agonists,” Brain Research, vol. 295, no. 1, pp. 179–183, 1984.

P. Coleman and R. Miller, “Do N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors mediate synaptic responses in the mudpuppy retina?” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 8, no. 12, pp. 4728–4733, 1988.

P. D. Lukasiewicz and J. S. McReynolds, “Synaptic transmission at N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors in the proximal retina of the mudpuppy,” Journal of Physiology, vol. 367, no. 1, pp. 99–115, 1985.

R. Kubrusly, M. C. de Mello, and F. G. de Mello, “Aspartate as a selective NMDA receptor agonist in cultured cells from the avian retina,” Neurochemistry International, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 47–52, 1998.

I. Perlman, R. A. Normann, and P. J. Anderton, “The effects of prolonged superfusions with acidic amino acids and their agonists on field potentials and horizontal cell photoresponses in the turtle retina,” Journal of Neurophysiology, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 1022–1032, 1987.

E.-i. Miyachi and M. Murakami, “Coexistence of NMDA and non-NMDA receptors on turtle horizontal cells revealed using isolated retina preparations,” Vision Research, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 385–388, 1989.

C. W. Kamp and W. W. Morgan, “Effects of excitatory amino acids on dopamine synthesis in the rat retina,” European Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 92, no. 1-2, pp. 139–142, 1983.

A. Karschin, E. Aizenman, and S. Lipton, “The interaction of agonists and noncompetitive antagonists at the excitatory amino acid receptors in rat retinal ganglion cells in vitro,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 8, no. 8, pp. 2895–2906, 1988.

S. C. Massey and R. F. Miller, “N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors of ganglion cells in rabbit retina,” Journal of Neurophysiology, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 16–30, 1990.

S. C. Massey and R. F. Miller, “Glutamate receptors of ganglion cells in the rabbit retina: evidence for glutamate as a bipolar cell transmitter,” Journal of Physiology, vol. 405, no. 1, pp. 635–655, 1988.

H. Ikeda, C. D. Kay, and J. Robbins, “Properties of excitatory amino acid receptors on sustained ganglion cells in the cat retina,” Neuroscience, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 27–38, 1989.

C. K. Mitchell and D. A. Redburn, “2-Amino-4-phosphonobutyric acid and N-methyl-d-aspartate differentiate between [3H]glutamate and [3H]aspartate binding sites in bovine retina,” Neuroscience Letters, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 241–246, 1982.

C. Tappeiner, J. Balmer, M. Iglicki et al., “Characteristics of rod regeneration in a novel zebrafish retinal degeneration model using N-methyl-N-nitrosourea (MNU),” PLoS One, vol. 8, no. 8, p. e71064, 2013.

K. Ogai, S. Hisano, K. Sugitani, Y. Koriyama, and S. Kato, “Cell fate of müller cells during photoreceptor regeneration in an N-methyl-N-nitrosourea-Induced retinal degeneration model of zebrafish,” Retinal Degenerative Diseases, vol. 854, pp. 685–692, 2016.

C. Dysli, M. Dysli, M. S. Zinkernagel, and V. Enzmann, “Effect of pharmacologically induced retinal degeneration on retinal autofluorescence lifetimes in mice,” Experimental Eye Research, vol. 153, pp. 178–185, 2016.

Y.-y. Chen, S.-l. Liu, D.-p. Hu, Y.-q. Xing, and Y. Shen, “N -methyl- N -nitrosourea-induced retinal degeneration in mice,” Experimental Eye Research, vol. 121, pp. 102–113, 2014.

Y. Tao, Z. Ma, B. Liu et al., “Hemin supports the survival of photoreceptors injured by N-Methyl-N-nitrosourea: the contributory role of neuroglobin in photoreceptor degeneration,” Brain Research, vol. 1678, pp. 47–55, 2018.

Y. Tao, T. Chen, B. Liu et al., “The neurotoxic effects of N-methyl-N-nitrosourea on the electrophysiological property and visual signal transmission of rat’s retina,” Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, vol. 286, no. 1, pp. 44–52, 2015.

J. L. Lin, Y. D. Wang, Y Ma et al., “Protective effects of naringenin eye drops on N-methyl-N-nitrosourea-induced photoreceptor cell death in rats,” International Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 391–396, 2014.

S.-S. Paik, E. Jeong, S. W. Jung et al., “Anthocyanins from the seed coat of black soybean reduce retinal degeneration induced by N-methyl-N-nitrosourea,” Experimental Eye Research, vol. 97, no. 1, pp. 55–62, 2012.

M. Taomoto, H. Nambu, H. Senzaki et al., “Retinal degeneration induced by N -methyl- N- nitrosourea in Syrian golden hamsters,” Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, vol. 236, no. 9, pp. 688–695, 1998.

S. Rösch, C. Werner, F. Müller, and P. Walter, “Photoreceptor degeneration by intravitreal injection of N-methyl-N-nitrosourea (MNU) in rabbits: a pilot study,” Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, vol. 255, no. 2, pp. 317–331, 2017.

L. Taylor, K. Arnér, and F. Ghosh, “N-methyl-N-nitrosourea-induced neuronal cell death in a large animal model of retinal degeneration in vitro,” Experimental Eye Research, vol. 148, pp. 55–64, 2016.

J. P. Schaller, M. Wyman, S. E. Weisbrode, and R. G. Olsen, “Induction of retinal degeneration in cats by methylnitrosourea and ketamine hydrochloride,” Veterinary Pathology, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 239–247, 1981.

K. Yoshizawa and A. Tsubura, “Characteristics of N-methyl-N-nitrosourea-induced retinal degeneration in animals and application for the therapy of human retinitis pigmentosa,” Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi, vol. 109, no. 6, pp. 327–337, 2005.

J. Kinoshita, N. Iwata, T. Maejima, M. Imaoka, T. Kimotsuki, and M. Yasuda, “N-Methyl-N-Nitrosourea-Induced acute alteration of retinal function and morphology in monkeys,” Investigative Opthalmology and Visual Science, vol. 56, no. 12, pp. 7146–7158, 2015.

G. Chowers, M. Cohen, D. Marks-Ohana et al., “Course of sodium iodate-induced retinal degeneration in albino and pigmented mice,” Investigative Opthalmology and Visual Science, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 2239–2249, 2017.

Y. Yang, T. K. Ng, C. Ye et al., “Assessing sodium iodate-induced outer retinal changes in rats using confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy and optical coherence tomography,” Investigative Opthalmology and Visual Science, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 1696–1705, 2014.

Y. Yang, Y. J. Qin, Y. W. Yip et al., “Green tea catechins are potent anti-oxidants that ameliorate sodium iodate-induced retinal degeneration in rats,” Scientific Reports, vol. 6, Article ID 29546, 2016.

J. Kiryu, F. Yamamoto, and Y. Honda, “Effects of sodium iodate on the electroretinogram c-wave in the cat,” Vision Research, vol. 32, no. 12, pp. 2221–2227, 1992.

B.-J. Cho, J.-M. Seo, H. G. Yu, and H. Chung, “Monocular retinal degeneration induced by intravitreal injection of sodium iodate in rabbit eyes,” Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 226–237, 2016.

R. Obata, Y. Yanagi, Y. Tamaki, K. Hozumi, M. Mutoh, and Y. Tanaka, “Retinal degeneration is delayed by tissue factor pathway inhibitor-2 in RCS rats and a sodium-iodate-induced model in rabbits,” Eye, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 464–468, 2005.

S. E. Nilsson, B. Knave, and H. E. Persson, “Changes in ultrastructure and function of the sheep pigment epithelium and retina induced by sodium iodate. II. Early effects,” Acta Ophthalmologica, vol. 55, no. 6, pp. 1007–1026, 1977.

J. Monés, M. Leiva, T. Peña et al., “A swine model of selective geographic atrophy of outer retinal layers mimicking atrophic AMD: a phase I escalating dose of subretinal sodium iodate,” Investigative Opthalmology and Visual Science, vol. 57, no. 10, pp. 3974–3983, 2016.

C.-N. Liu, Q. Peng, D. W. Yates, W. Huang, H. Devantier, and S. A. Aguirre, “Ocular safety assessment of sodium iodate in cynomolgus monkeys,” Toxicology Research and Application, vol. 1, p. 239784731769637, 2017.

R. A. Feit-Leichman, R. Kinouchi, M. Takeda et al., “Vascular damage in a mouse model of diabetic retinopathy: relation to neuronal and glial changes,” Investigative Opthalmology and Visual Science, vol. 46, no. 11, pp. 4281–4287, 2005.

W. Yang, X. Yu, Q. Zhang et al., “Attenuation of streptozotocin-induced diabetic retinopathy with low molecular weight fucoidan via inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor,” Experimental Eye Research, vol. 115, pp. 96–105, 2013.

B. Kumar, S. K. Gupta, T. C. Nag et al., “Retinal neuroprotective effects of quercetin in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats,” Experimental Eye Research, vol. 125, pp. 193–202, 2014.

W. Sun, P. J. Oates, J. B. Coutcher, C. Gerhardinger, and M. Lorenzi, “A selective aldose reductase inhibitor of a new structural class prevents or reverses early retinal abnormalities in experimental diabetic retinopathy,” Diabetes, vol. 55, no. 10, pp. 2757–2762, 2006.

A. S. Olsen, M. P. Sarras Jr., and R. V. Intine, “Limb regeneration is impaired in an adult zebrafish model of diabetes mellitus,” Wound Repair and Regeneration, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 532–542, 2010.

R. V. Intine, A. S. Olsen, and M. P. Sarras Jr, “A zebrafish model of diabetes mellitus and metabolic memory,” Journal of Visualized Experiments, no. 72, Article ID e50232, 2013.

F. Drago, C. La Manna, I. Emmi, and A. Marino, “Effects of sulfinpyrazone on retinal damage induced by experimental diabetes mellitus in rabbits,” Pharmacological Research, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 97–100, 1998.

H. R. Anderson, A. W. Stitt, T. A. Gardiner, S. J. Lloyd, and D. B. Archer, “Induction of alloxan/streptozotocin diabetes in dogs: a revised experimental technique,” Laboratory Animals, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 281–285, 1993.

M. O. Tso, A. Kurosawa, E. Benhamou, A. Bauman, J. Jeffrey, and O. Jonasson, “Microangiopathic retinopathy in experimental diabetic monkeys,” Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society, vol. 86, pp. 389–421, 1988.

S. E. Lee, W. Ma, E. M. Rattigan et al., “Ultrastructural features of retinal capillary basement membrane thickening in diabetic swine,” Ultrastructural Pathology, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 35–41, 2010.

N. K. Acharya, X. Qi, E. L. Goldwaser et al., “Retinal pathology is associated with increased blood-retina barrier permeability in a diabetic and hypercholesterolaemic pig model: beneficial effects of the LpPLA2 inhibitor Darapladib,” Diabetes and Vascular Disease Research, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 200–213, 2017.

D. Choi, “Glutamate neurotoxicity and diseases of the nervous system,” Neuron, vol. 1, no. 8, pp. 623–634, 1988.

F. H. Epstein, S. A. Lipton, and P. A. Rosenberg, “Excitatory amino acids as a final common pathway for neurologic disorders,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 330, no. 9, pp. 613–622, 1994.

J. Ambati, K. V. Chalam, D. K. Chawla et al., “Elevated γ-aminobutyric acid, glutamate, and vascular endothelial growth factor levels in the vitreous of patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy,” Archives of Ophthalmology, vol. 115, no. 9, pp. 1161–1166, 1997.

E. Lieth, A. J. Barber, B. Xu et al., “Glial reactivity and impaired glutamate metabolism in short-term experimental diabetic retinopathy. Penn State Retina Research Group,” Diabetes, vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 815–820, 1998.

E. Yoles and M. Schwartz, “Elevation of intraocular glutamate levels in rats with partial lesion of the optic nerve,” Archives of Ophthalmology, vol. 116, no. 7, pp. 906–910, 1998.

E. B. Dreyer and S. A. Lipton, “New perspectives on glaucoma,” JAMA, vol. 281, no. 4, pp. 306–308, 1999.

S. A. Lipton, “Possible role for memantine in protecting retinal ganglion cells from glaucomatous damage,” Survey of Ophthalmology, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. S38–S46, 2003.

Y. Wakabayashi, T. Yagihashi, J. Kezuka, D. Muramatsu, M. Usui, and T. Iwasaki, “Glutamate levels in aqueous humor of patients with retinal artery occlusion,” Retina, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 432–436, 2006.

H. A. Quigley, “Neuronal death in glaucoma,” Progress in Retinal and Eye Research, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 39–57, 1999.

T. Nakazawa, M. Watanabe, H. Kudo, K. Nishida, and M. Tamai, “Susceptibility to N-methyl-D-aspartate toxicity in morphological and functional types of cat retinal ganglion cells,” Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 156–162, 2010.

D. Linn and S. Massey, “Acetylcholine release from the rabbit retina mediated by NMDA receptors,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 123–133, 1991.

R. Siliprandi, R. Canella, G. Carmignoto et al., “N-methyl-D-aspartate-induced neurotoxicity in the adult rat retina,” Visual Neuroscience, vol. 8, no. 06, pp. 567–573, 1992.

R. Sattler and M. Tymianski, “Molecular mechanisms of glutamate receptor-mediated excitotoxic neuronal cell death,” Molecular Neurobiology, vol. 24, no. 1–3, pp. 107–129, 2001.

K. Chiu, T. T. Lam, Li W. W. Ying, J. Caprioli, and J. M. Kwong Kwong, “Calpain and N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA)-induced excitotoxicity in rat retinas,” Brain Research, vol. 1046, no. 1-2, pp. 207–215, 2005.

N. Bai, T. Aida, M. Yanagisawa et al., “NMDA receptor subunits have different roles in NMDA-induced neurotoxicity in the retina,” Molecular Brain, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 34, 2013.

L. Todd, N. Squires, L. Suarez, and A. J. Fischer, “Jak/Stat signaling regulates the proliferation and neurogenic potential of Muller glia-derived progenitor cells in the avian retina,” Scientific Reports, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 35703, 2016.

L. Todd, L. I. Volkov, C. Zelinka, N. Squires, and A. J. Fischer, “Heparin-binding EGF-like growth factor (HB-EGF) stimulates the proliferation of Müller glia-derived progenitor cells in avian and murine retinas,” Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience, vol. 69, pp. 54–64, 2015.

C. P. Zelinka, L. Volkov, Z. A. Goodman et al., “mTor signaling is required for the formation of proliferating Müller glia-derived progenitor cells in the chick retina,” Development, vol. 143, no. 11, pp. 1859–1873, 2016.

I. Hayashi, Y. Aoki, D. Asano et al., “Protective effects of everolimus against N-Methyl-D-aspartic acid-induced retinal damage in rats,” Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, vol. 38, no. 11, pp. 1765–1771, 2015.

A. Ichikawa, T. Nakahara, Y. Kurauchi, A. Mori, K. Sakamoto, and K. Ishii, “Rapamycin preventsN-methyl-D-aspartate-induced retinal damage through an ERK-dependent mechanism in rats,” Journal of Neuroscience Research, vol. 92, no. 6, pp. 692–702, 2014.

M. Harun-Or-Rashid, M. Díaz-DelCastillo, C. Galindo-Romero, and F. Hallböök, “Alpha2-Adrenergic-Agonist brimonidine stimulates negative feedback and attenuates injury-induced phospho-ERK and dedifferentiation of chicken müller cells,” Investigative Opthalmology and Visual Science, vol. 56, no. 10, pp. 5933–5945, 2015.

T. Nakazawa, M. Shimura, M. Ryu et al., “ERK1 plays a critical protective role againstN-methyl-D-aspartate-induced retinal injury,” Journal of Neuroscience Research, vol. 86, no. 1, pp. 136–144, 2008.

D. Gallina, I. Palazzo, L. Steffenson, L. Todd, and A. J. Fischer, “Wnt/β-catenin-signaling and the formation of Müller glia-derived progenitors in the chick retina,” Developmental Neurobiology, vol. 76, no. 9, pp. 983–1002, 2016.

A. V. Das, K. B. Mallya, X. Zhao et al., “Neural stem cell properties of Müller glia in the mammalian retina: regulation by Notch and Wnt signaling,” Developmental Biology, vol. 299, no. 1, pp. 283–302, 2006.

S. Hayes, B. R. Nelson, B. Buckingham, and T. A. Reh, “Notch signaling regulates regeneration in the avian retina,” Developmental Biology, vol. 312, no. 1, pp. 300–311, 2007.

K. Ghai, C. Zelinka, and A. J. Fischer, “Notch signaling influences neuroprotective and proliferative properties of mature Muller glia,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 30, no. 8, pp. 3101–3112, 2010.

F. Elsaeidi, P. Macpherson, E. A. Mills, J. Jui, J. G. Flannery, and D. Goldman, “Notch suppression collaborates with Ascl1 and Lin28 to unleash a regenerative response in fish retina, but not in mice,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 38, no. 9, pp. 2246–2261, 2018.

M. Ramírez and M. Lamas, “NMDA receptor mediates proliferation and CREB phosphorylation in postnatal Müller glia-derived retinal progenitors,” Molecular Vision, vol. 15, pp. 713–721, 2009.

L. I. Reyes-Aguirre, S. Ferraro, H. Quintero, S. L. Sánchez-Serrano, A. Gómez-Montalvo, and M. Lamas, “Glutamate-induced epigenetic and morphological changes allow rat Müller cell dedifferentiation but not further acquisition of a photoreceptor phenotype,” Neuroscience, vol. 254, pp. 347–360, 2013.

L. Todd, L. Suarez, C. Quinn, and A. J. Fischer, “Retinoic acid-signaling regulates the proliferative and neurogenic capacity of müller glia-derived progenitor cells in the avian retina,” Stem Cells, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 392–405, 2018.

A. J. Fischer, M. Schmidt, G. Omar, and T. A. Reh, “BMP4 and CNTF are neuroprotective and suppress damage-induced proliferation of Müller glia in the retina,” Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 531–542, 2004.

L. Todd, I. Palazzo, N. Squires, N. Mendonca, and A. J. Fischer, “BMP- and TGFβ-signaling regulate the formation of Müller glia-derived progenitor cells in the avian retina,” Glia, vol. 65, no. 10, pp. 1640–1655, 2017.

C. Tappeiner, E. Maurer, P. Sallin, T. Bise, V. Enzmann, and M. Tschopp, “Inhibition of the TGFβ pathway enhances retinal regeneration in adult zebrafish,” PLoS One, vol. 11, no. 11, p. e0167073, 2016.

K. Nomura-Komoike, F. Saitoh, Y. Komoike, and H. Fujieda, “DNA damage response in proliferating müller glia in the mammalian retina,” Investigative Opthalmology and Visual Science, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 1169–1182, 2016.

J. Wan, H. Zheng, Z.-L. Chen, H.-L. Xiao, Z.-J. Shen, and G.-M. Zhou, “Preferential regeneration of photoreceptor from Müller glia after retinal degeneration in adult rat,” Vision Research, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 223–234, 2008.

D. Gu, S. Wang, S. Zhang, P. Zhang, and G. Zhou, “Directed transdifferentiation of Müller glial cells to photoreceptors using the sonic hedgehog signaling pathway agonist purmorphamine,” Molecular Medicine Reports, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 7993–8002, 2017.

Q. Jian, Z. Tao, Y. Li, and Z. Q. Yin, “Acute retinal injury and the relationship between nerve growth factor, Notch1 transcription and short-lived dedifferentiation transient changes of mammalian Müller cells,” Vision Research, vol. 110, no. Pt A, pp. 107–117, 2015.

A. Machalinska, M. P. Kawa, E. Pius-Sadowska et al., “Endogenous regeneration of damaged retinal pigment epithelium following low dose sodium iodate administration: an insight into the role of glial cells in retinal repair,” Experimental Eye Research, vol. 112, pp. 68–78, 2013.

S. Fu, S. Dong, M. Zhu et al., “Müller glia are a major cellular source of survival signals for retinal neurons in diabetes,” Diabetes, vol. 64, no. 10, pp. 3554–3563, 2015.

A. Matteucci, L. Gaddini, M. Villa et al., “Neuroprotection by rat Müller glia against high glucose-induced neurodegeneration through a mechanism involving ERK1/2 activation,” Experimental Eye Research, vol. 125, pp. 20–29, 2014.

A. J. Fischer, M. A. Scott, E. R. Ritchey, and P. Sherwood, “Mitogen-activated protein kinase-signaling regulates the ability of Müller glia to proliferate and protect retinal neurons against excitotoxicity,” Glia, vol. 57, no. 14, pp. 1538–1552, 2009.

S. Ooto, T. Akagi, R. Kageyama et al., “Potential for neural regeneration after neurotoxic injury in the adult mammalian retina,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 101, no. 37, pp. 13654–13659, 2004.

A. J. Fischer and G. Omar, “Transitin, a nestin-related intermediate filament, is expressed by neural progenitors and can be induced in Müller glia in the chicken retina,” Journal of Comparative Neurology, vol. 484, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2005.

M. O. Karl, S. Hayes, B. R. Nelson, K. Tan, B. Buckingham, and T. A. Reh, “Stimulation of neural regeneration in the mouse retina,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 105, no. 49, pp. 19508–19513, 2008.

J. Xiao, X. Li, L. Chen et al., “Apobec1 promotes neurotoxicity-induced dedifferentiation of müller glial cells,” Neurochemical Research, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 1151–1164, 2017.

K. Ueda, T. Nakahara, A. Mori, K. Sakamoto, and K. Ishii, “Protective effects of TGF-beta inhibitors in a rat model of NMDA-induced retinal degeneration,” European Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 699, no. 1–3, pp. 188–193, 2013.

M. Kugler, A. Schlecht, R. Fuchshofer et al., “Heterozygous modulation of TGF-β signaling does not influence Müller glia cell reactivity or proliferation following NMDA-induced damage,” Histochemistry and Cell Biology, vol. 144, no. 5, pp. 443–455, 2015.

A. J. Fischer and T. A. Reh, “Müller glia are a potential source of neural regeneration in the postnatal chicken retina,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 247–252, 2001.

B. V. Fausett, J. D. Gumerson, and D. Goldman, “The proneural basic helix-loop-helix gene ascl1a is required for retina regeneration,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 1109–1117, 2008.

J. Pollak, M. S. Wilken, Y. Ueki et al., “ASCL1 reprograms mouse Muller glia into neurogenic retinal progenitors,” Development, vol. 140, no. 12, pp. 2619–2631, 2013.

N. L. Jorstad, M. S. Wilken, W. N. Grimes et al., “Stimulation of functional neuronal regeneration from Müller glia in adult mice,” Nature, vol. 548, no. 7665, pp. 103–107, 2017.

A. Warwick and A. Lotery, “Genetics and genetic testing for age-related macular degeneration,” Eye, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 849–857, 2018.

A. Zheng, Y. Li, and S. H. Tsang, “Personalized therapeutic strategies for patients with retinitis pigmentosa,” Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 391–402, 2015.

K. Jobst, “Teratogenous changes and tumors in rats following treatment with methylnitroso-urea (MNU),” Neoplasma, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 435-436, 1967.

K. Yoshizawa, Y. Oishi, H. Nambu et al., “Cataractogenesis in neonatal Sprague-Dawley rats by N-methyl-N-nitrosourea,” Toxicologic Pathology, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 555–564, 2000.

P. S. Vosler, D. Sun, S. Wang et al., “Calcium dysregulation induces apoptosis-inducing factor release: cross-talk between PARP-1- and calpain- signaling pathways,” Experimental Neurology, vol. 218, no. 2, pp. 213–220, 2009.

P. A. R. Ekstrom, M. Ueffing, E. Zrenner, and F. Paquet-Durand, “Novel in situ activity assays for the quantitative molecular analysis of neurodegenerative processes in the retina,” Current Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 21, no. 30, pp. 3478–3493, 2014.

Y. Xiong, H.-p. Ji, W.-t. Song et al., “N-methyl-N-nitrosourea induces retinal degeneration in the rat via the inhibition of NF-κB activation,” Cell Biochemistry and Function, vol. 34, no. 8, pp. 588–596, 2016.

K. Miki, K. Yoshizawa, N. Uehara, T. Yuri, Y. Matsuoka, and A. Tsubura, “PARP inhibitors accelerate N-methyl-N-nitrosourea-induced cataractogenesis in Sprague-Dawley rats,” In Vivo, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 739–744, 2007.

Y. Gao, X.-g. Deng, Q.-n. Sun, and Z.-q. Zhong, “Ganoderma spore lipid inhibits N-methyl-N-nitrosourea-induced retinal photoreceptor apoptosis in vivo,” Experimental Eye Research, vol. 90, no. 3, pp. 397–404, 2010.

Y. Tao, T. Chen, W. Fang et al., “The temporal topography of the N-Methyl- N-nitrosourea induced photoreceptor degeneration in mouse retina,” Scientific Reports, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 18612, 2015.

S. Saika, “TGFβ pathobiology in the eye,” Laboratory Investigation, vol. 86, no. 2, pp. 106–115, 2006.

A. Jazwinska, R. Badakov, and M. T. Keating, “Activin-betaA signaling is required for zebrafish fin regeneration,” Current Biology, vol. 17, no. 16, pp. 1390–1395, 2007.

E. Maurer, M. Tschopp, C. Tappeiner, P. Sallin, A. Jazwinska, and V. Enzmann, “Methylnitrosourea (MNU)-induced retinal degeneration and regeneration in the zebrafish: histological and functional characteristics,” Journal of Visualized Experiments, vol. 92, Article ID e51909, 2014.

H. Kohno, T. Sakai, and K. Kitahara, “Induction of nestin, Ki-67, and cyclin D1 expression in Müller cells after laser injury in adult rat retina,” Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, vol. 244, no. 1, pp. 90–95, 2006.

K. Yoshida, S. Kase, K. Nakayama et al., “Distribution of p27(KIP1), cyclin D1, and proliferating cell nuclear antigen after retinal detachment,” Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, vol. 242, no. 5, pp. 437–441, 2004.

R. D. Jager, W. F. Mieler, and J. W. Miller, “Age-related macular degeneration,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 358, no. 24, pp. 2606–2617, 2008.

J. Ambati and B. J. Fowler, “Mechanisms of age-related macular degeneration,” Neuron, vol. 75, no. 1, pp. 26–39, 2012.

X. Cai and J. F. McGinnis, “Oxidative stress: the achilles’ heel of neurodegenerative diseases of the retina,” Frontiers in Bioscience, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 1976–1995, 2012.

G. Age-Related Eye Disease Study 2 Research, “Lutein + zeaxanthin and omega-3 fatty acids for age-related macular degeneration: the Age-Related Eye Disease Study 2 (AREDS2) randomized clinical trial,” JAMA, vol. 309, no. 19, pp. 2005–2015, 2013.

W. Smith, J. Assink, R. Klein et al., “Risk factors for age-related macular degeneration,” Ophthalmology, vol. 108, no. 4, pp. 697–704, 2001.

S. C. Tomany, J. J. Wang, R. Van Leeuwen et al., “Risk factors for incident age-related macular degeneration,” Ophthalmology, vol. 111, no. 7, pp. 1280–1287, 2004.

J. C. Khan, D. A. Thurlby, H. Shahid et al., “Smoking and age related macular degeneration: the number of pack years of cigarette smoking is a major determinant of risk for both geographic atrophy and choroidal neovascularisation,” British Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 90, no. 1, pp. 75–80, 2006.

S. Hariri, A. A. Moayed, V. Choh, and K. Bizheva, “In vivo assessment of thickness and reflectivity in a rat outer retinal degeneration model with ultrahigh resolution optical coherence tomography,” Investigative Opthalmology and Visual Science, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 1982–1989, 2012.

A swine model of selective geographic atrophy of outer retinal layers mimicking atrophic AMD a phase I escalating dose of subretinal sodium Iodat.pdf.

L. M. Franco, R. Zulliger, U. E. K. Wolf-Schnurrbusch et al., “Decreased visual function after patchy loss of retinal pigment epithelium induced by low-dose sodium iodate,” Investigative Opthalmology and Visual Science, vol. 50, no. 8, pp. 4004–4010, 2009.

J. Hanus, C. Anderson, D. Sarraf, J. Ma, and S. Wang, “Retinal pigment epithelial cell necroptosis in response to sodium iodate,” Cell Death Discovery, vol. 2, no. 1, p. 16054, 2016.

W. Wang, J. Noel, H. J. Kaplan, and D. C. Dean, “Circulating reactive oxidant causes apoptosis of retinal pigment epithelium and cone photoreceptors in the mouse central retina,” Ophthalmology and Eye Diseases, vol. 3, pp. 45–54, 2011.

A. Machalinska, W. Lubinski, P. Klos et al., “Sodium iodate selectively injuries the posterior pole of the retina in a dose-dependent manner: morphological and electrophysiological study,” Neurochemical Research, vol. 35, no. 11, pp. 1819–1827, 2010.

K. Sadamoto, Y. Yamagiwa, H. Sakaki, and M. Kurata, “Absence of histopathological changes in the retina of zebrafish treated with sodium iodate,” Journal of Veterinary Medical Science, vol. 80, no. 6, pp. 901–908, 2018.

W. K. Noell, “Experimentally induced toxic effects on structure and function of visual cells and pigment epithelium,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 103–116, 1953.

E. A. Mills and D. Goldman, “The regulation of Notch signaling in retinal development and regeneration,” Current Pathobiology Reports, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 323–331, 2017.

C. B. Del Debbio, Q. Mir, S. Parameswaran et al., “Notch signaling activates stem cell properties of müller glia through transcriptional regulation and skp2-mediated degradation of p27Kip1,” PLoS One, vol. 11, no. 3, p. e0152025, 2016.

H. Xia, M. P. Krebs, S. Kaushal, and E. W. Scott, “Enhanced retinal pigment epithelium regeneration after injury in MRL/MpJ mice,” Experimental Eye Research, vol. 93, no. 6, pp. 862–872, 2011.

H. Sun, P. Lee, C. Yan et al., “Inhibition of soluble epoxide hydrolase 2 ameliorates diabetic keratopathy and impaired wound healing in mouse corneas,” Diabetes, vol. 67, no. 6, pp. 1162–1172, 2018.

R. H. Wallis, K. Wang, L Marandi et al., “Type 1 diabetes in the BB rat: a polygenic disease,” Diabetes, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 1007–1017, 2009.

M. Fukuda, Y. Nakanishi, M. Fuse et al., “Altered expression of aquaporins 1 and 4 coincides with neurodegenerative events in retinas of spontaneously diabetic Torii rats,” Exp Eye Res, vol. 90, no. 1, pp. 17–25, 2010.

Z. Han, J. Guo, S. M. Conley, and M. I. Naash, “Retinal angiogenesis in the Ins2(Akita) mouse model of diabetic retinopathy,” Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 574–584, 2013.

J. Zhang, Y. Wu, Y. Jin et al., “Intravitreal injection of erythropoietin protects both retinal vascular and neuronal cells in early diabetes,” Investigative Opthalmology and Visual Science, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 732–742, 2008.

L. Li, Y.-l. Li, Y.-f. Zhou et al., “Jiangtang Xiaozhi Recipe (降糖消脂方) prevents diabetic retinopathy in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats,” Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 425–432, 2017.

M. Sasaki, Y. Ozawa, T. Kurihara et al., “Neurodegenerative influence of oxidative stress in the retina of a murine model of diabetes,” Diabetologia, vol. 53, no. 5, pp. 971–979, 2010.

T. Kurihara, Y. Ozawa, K. Shinoda et al., “Neuroprotective effects of angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R) blocker, telmisartan, via modulating AT1R and AT2R signaling in retinal inflammation,” Investigative Opthalmology and Visual Science, vol. 47, no. 12, pp. 5545–5552, 2006.

C. Cunha, R. Brambilla, and K. L. Thomas, “A simple role for BDNF in learning and memory?” Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, vol. 3, p. 1, 2010.

M. Seki, T. Tanaka, H. Nawa et al., “Involvement of brain-derived neurotrophic factor in early retinal neuropathy of streptozotocin-induced diabetes in rats: therapeutic potential of brain-derived neurotrophic factor for dopaminergic amacrine cells,” Diabetes, vol. 53, no. 9, pp. 2412–2419, 2004.

V. J. Dzau, “Tissue angiotensin and pathobiology of vascular disease,” Hypertension, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 1047–1052, 2001.

M. Sata and D. Fukuda, “Crucial role of renin-angiotensin system in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis,” Journal of Medical Investigation, vol. 57, no. 1-2, pp. 12–25, 2010.

C. Gerhardinger, M. B. s. Costa, M. C. Coulombe, I. Toth, T. Hoehn, and P. Grosu, “Expression of acute-phase response proteins in retinal Müller cells in diabetes,” Investigative Opthalmology and Visual Science, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 349–357, 2005.

Y. Bai, J.-x. Ma, J. Guo et al., “Müller cell-derived VEGF is a significant contributor to retinal neovascularization,” Journal of Pathology, vol. 219, no. 4, pp. 446–454, 2009.

J. Wang, X. Xu, M. H. Elliott, M. Zhu, and Y.-Z. Le, “Muller cell-derived VEGF is essential for diabetes-induced retinal inflammation and vascular leakage,” Diabetes, vol. 59, no. 9, pp. 2297–2305, 2010.

M. Dai, X.-B. Xia, and S.-Q. Xiong, “BDNF regulates GLAST and glutamine synthetase in mouse retinal Müller cells,” Journal of Cellular Physiology, vol. 227, no. 2, pp. 596–603, 2012.

T. Saito, T. Abe, R. Wakusawa et al., “TrkB-T1 receptors on Muller cells play critical role in brain-derived neurotrophic factor-mediated photoreceptor protection against phototoxicity,” Current Eye Research, vol. 34, no. 7, pp. 580–588, 2009.

K. K. Zhou, S. Benyajati, Y. Le, R. Cheng, W. Zhang, and J.-x. Ma, “Interruption of Wnt signaling in müller cells ameliorates ischemia-induced retinal neovascularization,” PLoS One, vol. 9, no. 10, p. e108454, 2014.

X. Ye, H. Ren, M. Zhang, Z. Sun, A. C. Jiang, and G. Xu, “ERK1/2 signaling pathway in the release of VEGF from müller cells in diabetes,” Investigative Opthalmology and Visual Science, vol. 53, no. 7, pp. 3481–3489, 2012.

X. Zhao, Y. Li, S. Lin et al., “The effects of sonic hedgehog on retinal müller cells under high-glucose stress,” Investigative Opthalmology and Visual Science, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 2773–2782, 2015.